Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Transient domains of ordered water induced by divalent ions lead to lipid membrane curvature fluctuations

Abstract

Cell membranes are composed of a hydrated lipid bilayer that is molecularly complex and diverse, and the link between molecular hydration structure and membrane macroscopic properties is not well understood, due to a lack of technology that can probe and relate molecular level hydration information to micro- and macroscopic properties. Here, we demonstrate a direct link between lipid hydration structure and macroscopic dynamic curvature fluctuations. Using high-throughput wide-field second harmonic (SH) microscopy, we observe the formation of transient domains of ordered water at the interface of freestanding lipid membranes. These domains are induced by the binding of divalent ions and their structure is ion specific. Using nonlinear optical theory, we convert the spatiotemporal SH intensity into maps of membrane potential, surface charge density, and binding free energy. Using an electromechanical theory of membrane bending, we show that transient electric field gradients across the membrane induce spatiotemporal membrane curvature fluctuations.

Introduction

Cell membranes are in a constant state of structural flux1,2. Lipid bilayer membranes provide a rich environment for the formation of diverse structures and environments. Membrane structuring is commonly described in terms of lipid segregation and measured by probing the hydrophobic core of a membrane3,4,5, or tagged lipids6,7,8,9,10. While this provides information about lipid–lipid interactions, tagging may also modify the membrane. Both methods also largely ignore the role of water, electrostatic and hydrogen bonding interactions, and the influence of the electric double layer. These interactions play an important role in the membrane function11,12 but have not been quantified in living cells, nor in realistic bilayer systems, such as liposomes or freestanding lipid bilayers. As an example, ion-specific effects that involve the complex interaction between cations, surface charges, polar, and hydrophobic groups are important in signaling through ion-specific channels in synapses13,14,15,16, the folding of proteins17,18, the formation of secondary structures19,20, and the induction of cell death by the presence of charged phosphatidylserine lipids21. How these processes work on a molecular level is presently not understood. Although molecular level experiments on model planar air/lipid/water monolayer systems22,23,24,25, and supported bilayer—protein systems19,26, have revealed ingredients of the already complex molecular behavior that consists of different types of interactions between ion, lipids, proteins, and water molecules, they do not take into account the length scale, and the spatial and temporal dynamic behavior that is clearly important for the bilayer membranes of cells. Additionally, several molecular dynamics simulations have hinted on the importance of local and transient nature of model bilayer systems22,27,28,29,30,31,32. An important question, therefore, is whether the behavior of membranes and membrane hydration in particular can be captured, by averaging spatial and temporal fluctuations in the system33. Such averaging invokes assumptions that are necessarily made by the technical limitations that result in the application of mean-field model descriptions.

Here, we probe the interactions of divalent cations (Ca2+, Ba2+, and Mg2+ at physiologically relevant concentrations), with water and negatively charged freestanding lipid bilayers using high-throughput wide-field second harmonic (SH) microscopy. We find that divalent cation–membrane interactions result in the formation of short-lived (<500 ms), ~1.5 micron-sized domains of orientationally ordered water. The SH intensity is converted into membrane potential (Φ0), surface charge density (σ0), membrane hydration free energy (ΔG), and ion binding dissociation constant (KD) maps. The ion-induced changes follow the order Ca2+ > Ba2+ > Mg2+ for all four quantities. The dissociation constant (KD) of the domains reach values up to 2.7 × 10−12 M, deviating up to four orders of magnitude from dissociation constant based on a mean-field interpretation. Using an electromechanical theory of membrane bending, we show that transient electric field gradients across the membrane lead to transient curvature fluctuations, resulting in the temporal and spatial fluctuations in membrane mechanical properties.

Results and discussion

Spatiotemporal ion-specific effects

Freestanding horizontal planar lipid membranes were formed following the Montal-Müller method34,35. Two separate lipid monolayers at the air/water interface were apposed in an 80–120-µm-sized circular aperture in a 25-µm thick Teflon film. The horizontally mounted membrane was imaged with a medium repetition rate, wide-field nonlinear SH microscope. Two counter-propagating 190 fs, 1032 nm, 200 kHz pulsed beams with an opening angle of 45 deg illuminate the membrane interface, such that phase-matched SH photons are emitted and recorded along the membrane surface normal (Fig. 1a, see refs. 36,37). Figure 1b shows a SH image recorded of a symmetric lipid bilayer of identical leaflets composed of 70:30 mol% 1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPhPC) and 1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (DPhPA). Figure 1c shows a SH image recorded of an asymmetric lipid bilayer composed of a DPhPC leaflet (bottom leaflet) and a 70:30 mole% mixture of DPhPC:DPhPA (top leaflet). No coherent SH photons are generated by the symmetric bilayer while the asymmetric bilayer does generate a SH response. As we showed in ref. 37, the SH response arises from the charge–dipole interaction between the charged head groups and the dipolar water molecules, which creates a non-random orientational distribution of water dipoles along the surface normal. Figure 1d–f shows SH images of the same symmetric DPhPC:DPhPA bilayer system as in Fig. 1b, but instead of using an aqueous KCl solution in contact with both leaflets, we replaced the solution adjacent to the top leaflet with (CaCl2)aq, (BaCl2)aq, and (MgCl2)aq solutions of the same ionic strength (150 µM).

Fig. 1: Divalent cations induce transient domains of ordered interfacial water.
figure1

a Two counter-propagating beams (190 fs, 1030 nm, ω, red arrows) overlap in space and time to illuminate the lipid bilayer membrane. SH photons (2ω, green arrow) are collected (magnification: 50×, NA = 0.65) in the phase-matched direction. SH images of b a symmetric membrane composed of 70:30 mol% DPhPC:DPhPA and c an asymmetric membrane composed of 70:30 mol% DPhPC:DPhPA (top leaflet), and DPhPC (bottom leaflet) in contact with a 150 µM pH neutral KCl solution. df SH images of a symmetric membrane composed of 70:30 mol% DPhPC:DPhPA with the bottom leaflet in contact with a 150 µM pH neutral KCl solution, and the top leaflet in contact with a pH neutral CaCl2 d, BaCl2 e, and MgCl2 f at 150 µM ionic strength. The images were collected with all beams P-polarized, and represent 20 × 560 ms frame averages. The scale bar (10 µm) is the same for all images. The SH image of a 150-μM KCl solution was subtracted from the images to remove the hyper-Rayleigh scattering contribution.

Adding Ca2+, Ba2+, or Mg2+ to the aqueous phase results in a spatially fragmented SH response. Ca2+, Ba2+, and Mg2+ are known to interact specifically with negatively charged lipid head groups22,23,31,38,39 forming lipid–cation complexes. The water in contact with such neutral cation–lipid clusters has a negligible orientational ordering along the interfacial normal40. Membrane water in contact with free head group charges, on the other hand, does exhibit an orientational order along the interfacial normal. When both structures are present on opposite sides of the membrane, centrosymmetry is broken, resulting in domains of bright SH intensity. The degree to which the centrosymmetry is broken depends on the strength of interaction between the divalent ion and the negatively charged head groups. Figure 1 shows that the number of domains and the relative intensity decreases in the order Ca2+ > Ba2+ > Mg2+. This implies that the interaction of Ca2+ with the negatively charged head groups is stronger when compared to Ba2+ and Mg2+.

To analyze the properties of these domains in more detail, we turn to single frame analysis (560 ms/frame) and analyze the normalized spatial (Fig. 2a, b) and temporal (Fig. 2c) correlations between the domains in a single leaflet, and the coupling between domains in both leaflets (Fig. 2d). The full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the spatial correlation function reports on the characteristic radius of the domains, whereas the FWHM of the temporal autocorrelation function reports on the characteristic lifetime of the domains. The spatiotemporal evolution of the domains on a single leaflet is shown in Fig. 2a, where three consecutive time frames are shown (raw data), each recorded with a 560 ms integration time. Figure 2b shows the normalized spatial autocorrelation function (SACF) for the consecutive time frames of Fig. 2a. The gray curves are SACFs of the individual frames, the black data points are the average SACFs of the 20 frames fitted with a Gaussian curve. The average radius of the domains, derived from the FWHM of Fig. 2b is 1.5 µm. Figure 2c shows the normalized temporal autocorrelation function (TACF) for the consecutive time frames of Fig. 2a. Applying the same analysis to a series of single frame images of Ba2+ and Mg2+, we obtained the same average radius and temporal decay of their spatiotemporal correlations (Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 1). Because the temporal correlation function decays faster than the recording time, the characteristic time of each domain is, therefore, shorter than the recording time. Thus, there is no correlation between the domains on the time scale of acquisition.

Fig. 2: Spatiotemporal dynamics of ion-induced ordered water domains.
figure2

a Time series of SH images (560 ms each) of a symmetric membrane composed of 70:30 mol% DPhPC:DPhPA with the top leaflet in contact with (CaCl2)aq and the bottom leaflet in contact with (KCl)aq. b Normalized spatial autocorrelation functions (SACF) of the single frame images in a. The gray curves represent the SACF of the individual frames (20 frames total) and the black data points are the average SACF values of all the gray curves fitted with a Gaussian curve. c Normalized TACF of the images in a showing no temporal correlation between frames. d SH image (average of 20 frames, 560 ms) of a symmetric membrane composed of 70:30 mol% DPhPC:DPhPA where both leaflets are in contact with (CaCl2)aq with the same 150 µM ionic strength. This SH image was corrected for hyper-Rayleigh scattering by subtracting a 150-μM KCl solution SH image. All images were collected with all beams P-polarized. The scale bar (10 µm) is the same for all images.

To understand the coupling between the SH domains on each leaflet, we recorded SH images of a 70:30 mole% DPhPC:DPhPA symmetric bilayer with CaCl2 added to both leaflets at 150 µM ionic strength. The 20 frame (10.4 s) average result is shown in Fig. 2d. The image shows a SH contrast that has a comparable intensity to the response of the asymmetric lipid bilayer in Fig. 1c, but less intensity compared to the response of a symmetric bilayer in Fig. 1d where only one leaflet is in contact with CaCl2. Addition of Ca2+ to both leaflets should lead to a vanishing SH response if neutral ion-lipid complexes are formed. This is especially true if the domains on opposing leaflets are in registry, i.e., the leaflets are strongly coupled41. However, if the leaflets are not in registry, i.e., not strongly coupled, then a non-vanishing SH response is expected. The non-vanishing SH response in Fig. 2d suggests that the domains in the opposing leaflets are not strongly coupled.

Quantifying membrane potential and free energy changes

Figures 1 and 2 show that divalent cations induce transient structural heterogeneities of ordered water in freestanding lipid bilayer membranes. The hydration shells of both leaflets are only partially correlated, and specific ion effects are important. To obtain more insight into the physicochemical behavior, we next quantify the spatiotemporal membrane potential, surface charge distribution, and free energy landscape. Theory and experiments42,43 have shown that the SH intensity of an interface depends quadratically on the surface potential (Φ0) and for lipid bilayers with two oppositely oriented membrane interfaces we have37:

$$I\left( {2\omega ,x,y} \right)\sim I\left( {\omega ,x,y} \right)^2\left| {\chi _{{\mathrm{s}}1}^{\left( 2 \right)}\left( {x,y} \right) - \chi _{{\mathrm{s}}2}^{\left( 2 \right)}\left( {x,y} \right) + f_3\chi ^{{\mathrm{(}}3{\mathrm{)}}\prime }({\mathrm{\Phi }}_{0,1}(x,y) - {\mathrm{\Phi }}_{0,2}(x,y))} \right|^2$$
(1)

where \(\chi _{{\mathrm{s}},1}^{\left( 2 \right)}/\chi _{{\mathrm{s}},2}^{\left( 2 \right)}\) and Φ0,10,2 are the surface second-order susceptibilities and the surface potentials of each leaflet, respectively, and χ(3)′ is an effective third-order susceptibility of the aqueous phase44. The subscripts 1 and 2 refer to the top/bottom leaflets of the bilayer, x and y are the spatial coordinates, ω is the frequency of the fundamental beam, and f3 is an interference term, where f3 → 1 for transmission experiments37,44,45. For symmetric bilayers, \(\chi _{{\mathrm{s}}1}^{\left( 2 \right)} = \chi _{{\mathrm{s}}2}^{\left( 2 \right)}\), and Eq. (1) is reduced to \(I\left( {2\omega ,x,y} \right) \propto \left| {\chi ^{(3)\prime }({\mathrm{\Phi }}_{0,1}(x,y) - {\mathrm{\Phi }}_{0,2}(x,y))} \right|^2\). With identical surface potentials the coherent SH intensity vanishes (Fig. 1b). By recording SH images of an asymmetric charged leaflet as a function of external electric bias, we showed that it is possible to convert the SH intensity scale into a membrane potential scale, \(\Delta {\mathrm{\Phi }}_0 = {\mathrm{\Phi }}_{0,1}\left( {x,y} \right) - {\mathrm{\Phi }}_{0,2}(x,y)\) (Supplementary Note 4). From ΔΦ0, the change in electrostatic free energy (ΔG) is found as ΔG = 2eΔΦ0, and the ion–lipid dissociation constant (KD) is given by ΔG = −RTln(KD) where T is the temperature and R is the gas constant46. Furthermore, the surface charge density (Δσ0) was modeled with a parallel plate capacitor in contact with aqueous solution47, appropriate for divalent ion negatively charged interface interactions22,31, where \(\Delta \sigma _0 = C \times \Delta {\mathrm{\Phi }}_0\), with \(C = \varepsilon _0{\it{\epsilon }}/d\), \({\it{\epsilon }} = 2.1\), and d = 4 nm, the dielectric constant, and thickness of the hydrophobic core respectively35.

Figure 3 shows the measured intensity values (Fig. 3a; corrected for hyper-Rayleigh scattering (HRS) by image subtraction), extracted values for the membrane potential (ΔΦ0) and the surface charge density (Δσ0; Fig. 3b), the electrostatic free energy change (ΔG) and the binding dissociation constant (KD; Fig. 3c) for the different divalent cations SH imaged in Fig. 1d–f. The average quantities are displayed on each panel. Table 1 lists the image stack averaged values of (ΔΦ0, Δσ0, ΔG, and KD and the values for the domains (corrected for HRS; Supplementary Note 2, Supplementary Note 3, Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). Our average values are in good agreement with (the limited) literature on binding constants48,49,50,51. However, Figs. 13 and Table 1 show a very interesting unexpected aspect: instead of a uniformly distributed divalent cation–lipid binding, there are transient structures. Examining these domains, much larger values are found for ΔΦ0, Δσ0, ΔG, and KD, resulting in actual binding dissociation constants that are up to four orders of magnitude larger than the total spatially averaged value. In addition, there are places on the image where virtually no binding occurs, and the chemical structures where binding occurs are short lived and continuously redistribute across the membrane.

Fig. 3: Quantifying the free energy landscape of membranes.
figure3

a Average SH intensity 〈I〉, b the change in membrane potential 〈ΔΦ0〉, and surface charge density 〈Δσ0〉 (assuming a parallel plate capacitor model), c free energy of binding 〈ΔG〉 and ion–lipid dissociation constant 〈ΔKD〉 for symmetric membranes composed of 70:30 mol% DPhPC:DPhPA where the top leaflet is in contact with divalent cations: Ca2+, Ba2+, and Mg2+, and the bottom leaflet is in contact with KCl ions with the same ionic strength (150 µM). Units are provided with the color scale to the right. The scale bar (10 µm) is the same for all images.

Table 1 Image-averaged and single-domain values of membrane potential (ΔΦ0), surface charge density (Δσ0), electrostatic free energy of binding (ΔG), and ion–lipid dissociation constant (KD).

From transient membrane structure to curvature

The transient structural domains (Fig. 3) exhibit membrane potential fluctuations of up to −386 mV (with ΔG = 28.6 kT). Although the molecular level interactions are complex, our findings can be rationalized qualitatively as follows (Fig. 4): the addition of divalent ions leads to an electrostatic field gradient (Fig. 4b) that induces strain in the membrane via a surface pressure gradient across the membrane and steric pressure along the membrane52,53. A homogeneous distribution of ions results in high local strain due to the electromechanical coupling with membrane fluctuations. However, the local clustering of ions can potentially relax high strains when these clusters are spread out over larger distances54,55 (Fig. 4c). Using a mean-field liquid crystal membrane approximation to calculate the curvature as a function of an applied electric field56,57, and using again the approximation of an electric capacitor, we estimated the curvature H for the three cations. The total curvature of the membrane in response to an applied electric field (E) is given by \(H = \frac{{fE}}{{2\kappa }} = \frac{{f\Delta {\mathrm{\Phi }}_0}}{{2\kappa d}}\), with f the flexocoefficient of the membrane, and κ the bending modulus. Using 10 kT < κ < 20 kT and 10−21 < f < 10−18 C11, we find 3.6 × 10−4 < H < 0.98 nm−1. The small value of curvature corresponds to a membrane with a large bending modulus and with a low flexoelastic coefficient, while the large curvature values correspond to a membrane with a small bending modulus and a large flexoelastic coefficient. This model ignores thermal fluctuations, cation penetration into the headgroup22,27,28,29,30, and other electromechanical effects that should be taken account for quantitative analysis of curvature fluctuations. Nevertheless, it shows that the measured transient fluctuations in Fig. 3 can lead to transient curvature fluctuations. This, in turn, will result in surface tension fluctuations58,59. Figure 4d shows topographic maps of membrane deformation generated from the center of the images of Fig. 3b, showing that different electric fields can induce different extents of transient curvatures for Ca2+, Ba2+, and Mg2+ ions, following the trend of the Hofmeister series. The large and dense potential fluctuations induced by Ca2+ should thus result in a larger variation in the height profile of the membrane. The smaller and more spread out fluctuations for Mg2+ (and Ba2+) result in smaller curvature deviations and thus in smaller height profile fluctuations.

Fig. 4: Specific ion-induced transient curvature.
figure4

a Schematic of a symmetric negatively charged membrane in solution. b The binding of Ca2+ to a symmetric negatively charged membrane induces an asymmetric electric field gradient, which is different for a homogeneous (top) or clustered (bottom) distribution of cations, leading to different pressure profiles, and c consequently different membrane curvatures. d Topographic maps of membrane deformation of the membranes of Fig. 3, showing more pronounced transient curvature fluctuations for Ca2+ > Ba2+ > Mg2+ (using f = 5 × 10−19 C, κ = 15 kT, and d = 4 nm). The scale bar is 10 µm.

In summary, we demonstrate that at physiological concentrations Ca2+, Ba2+, and Mg2+ induce short-lived (<500 ms) ~1.5 micron-sized domains of ordered interfacial water. Converting the SH intensity into membrane potential, surface charge density, membrane hydration free energy, and binding dissociation constant maps, we obtain trends in the order Ca2+ > Ba2+ > Mg2+, for all four quantities and reach domain values of −368 mV, −1.7 mC/m2, 28.6 kT, and 2.7 × 10−12 M that deviate up to four orders of magnitude from current reaction constant values that are based on a mean-field interpretation. Additionally, the transient electric field gradients across the membrane lead to transient curvature, resulting in temporal and spatial variations in the mechanical properties for the membrane. Although we used a mean-field model as a first approximation for curvature estimation, there have been many molecular dynamics simulations of cation interaction with phospholipid bilayers22. These simulations have shown that the cations can form large scale clusters that can dehydrate and neutralize anionic lipid bilayers22, strongly adsorb onto the lipid bilayer22,27,28,29,30, and compress the lipid bilayer laterally22. Additionally, calcium ions are known to penetrate deeply into the lipid bilayer in a concentration-dependent manner22. Here, we show that the interactions of cations with the membrane also induce curvature of the membrane. Thus, aside from having a local-specific interaction with lipids as has been previously known22,23,24,25, divalent ions also influence the spatiotemporal chemical, electric and mechanical membrane properties, leading to a diversification of membrane environments, and a new mechanism for coupling local chemical interactions with macroscopic behavior. Such an effect potentially plays an important role in membrane protein interactions, important for structuring, signaling, and transport.

Methods

Chemicals

DPhPC and DPhPA in powder form (>99%, Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabama, USA), hexadecane (C16H34, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich), hexane (C6H14, >99%, Sigma-Aldrich), chloroform (>99.8%, Merck), hydrogen peroxide (30%, Reactolab SA), sulfuric acid (95–97%, ISO, Merck), KCl (99.999%, Aros), CaCl2 (99.999%), MgCl2 (99.99%), and BaCl2 (99.999%, Sigma-Aldrich) were used as received. All aqueous solutions were made with ultra-pure water (H2O, Milli-Q UF plus, Millipore, Inc., electrical resistance of 18.2 MΩ cm). All aqueous solutions were filtered with 0.1 μM Millex filters. The coverslips used in the imaging were pre-cleaned with piranha solution (1:3–30% H2O2: 95–97% H2SO4) and thoroughly rinsed with ultra-pure water.

Formation of freestanding horizontal planar lipid bilayers

Freestanding horizontal planar lipid bilayers were formed following the procedure of Montal-Müller34,60. Two separated lipid monolayers on an air/water interface were combined in a ~80–120-µm aperture in 25-µm thick Teflon film. The presence of a bilayer was confirmed with white light imaging and electrical recordings with specific capacitance, Cm > 0.7 µF/cm2, specific resistance, Rm ~ 108 Ω cm2 (refs. 61,62). The composition of the leaflets and the aqueous solution where the bilayer leaflets reside are controllable in situ. Unless stated, all measurements were performed at pH neutral conditions.

Electrical characterization of freestanding lipid membranes

Ag/AgCl pellet electrodes were placed on each side of the bilayer and electrical measurements were recorded through the HEKA patch clamp amplifiers. Capacitance and resistance measurements were made with HEKA’s built-in software-based lock-in amplifier63. For more details, see ref. 37.

SH imaging

The imaging setup has been characterized in detail in refs. 36,37,64 based on principles of SH scattering65. Two counter-propagating beams from a Yb:KGW femtosecond laser (Light Conversion Ltd) delivering 190 fs pulses, 1028 nm with a 200 kHz repetition rate were incident at 45° with respect to the membrane. Each beam was loosely focused using an f = 20 cm doublet lens (B coating, Thorlabs), and polarization controlled using a linear polarizer (Glan-Taylor polarizer, GT10-B, Thorlabs) and a zero-order λ/2 wave plates (WPH05M-1030, Thorlabs). The average power for each arm was set to ~110 mW. The phase-matched SH photons were collected with a 50× objective lens (Mitutoyo Plan Apo NIR HR Infinity-Corrected Objective, 0.65 NA in combination with a tube lens (Mitutoyo MT-L), a 900 nm short pass filter (FES0900, Thorlabs), a 515 nm band-pass filter (FL514.5-10), and an intensified electronically amplified CCD camera (IE-CCD, PiMax4, Princeton Instruments). A 400 mm meniscus lens was placed behind the objective lens to remove spherical aberrations induced by the coverslip. The transverse resolution, and thus the pixel width was 430 nm. All images were recorded with the beams polarized parallel to the plane of incidence (P). The acquisition time of the images was 560 ms.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Simons, K. & Ikonen, E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387, 569–572 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Baumgart, T., Hess, S. T. & Webb, W. W. Imaging coexisting fluid domains in biomembrane models coupling curvature and line tension. Nature 425, 821 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    de Wit, G., Danial, J. S. H., Kukura, P. & Wallace, M. I. Dynamic label-free imaging of lipid nanodomains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12299–12303 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Engel, A. & Muller, D. J. Observing single biomolecules at work with the atomic force microscope. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 715–718 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Richter, R. P. & Brisson, A. R. Following the formation of supported lipid bilayers on mica: a study combining AFM, QCM-D, and ellipsometry. Biophysical J. 88, 3422–3433 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cicuta, P., Keller, S. L. & Veatch, S. L. Diffusion of liquid domains in lipid bilayer membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 3328–3331 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Baumgart, T., Hunt, G., Farkas, E. R., Webb, W. W. & Feigenson, G. W. Fluorescence probe partitioning between Lo/Ld phases in lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1768, 2182–2194 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Collins, M. D. & Keller, S. L. Tuning lipid mixtures to induce or suppress domain formation across leaflets of unsupported asymmetric bilayers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 124–128 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Veatch, S. L. & Keller, S. L. Seeing spots: complex phase behavior in simple membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1746, 172–185 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Veatch, S. L., Polozov, I. V., Gawrisch, K. & Keller, S. L. Liquid domains in vesicles investigated by NMR and fluorescence microscopy. Biophysical J. 86, 2910–2922 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ahmadpoor, F. & Sharma, P. Flexoelectricity in two-dimensional crystalline and biological membranes. Nanoscale 7, 16555–16570 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ray, S., Kassan, A., Busija, A. R., Rangamani, P. & Patel, H. H. The plasma membrane as a capacitor for energy and metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 310, C181–C192 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Horner, A., Siligan, C., Cornean, A. & Pohl, P. Positively charged residues at the channel mouth boost single-file water flow. Faraday Discuss. 209, 55–65 (2018).

  14. 14.

    Peterka, D. S., Takahashi, H. & Yuste, R. Imaging voltage in neurons. Neuron 69, 9–21 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Smetters, D., Majewska, A. & Yuste, R. Detecting action potentials in neuronal populations with calcium imaging. Methods 18, 215–221 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Horner, A. et al. The mobility of single-file water molecules is governed by the number of H-bonds they may form with channel-lining residues. Science Advances 1, e1400083 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Kiskis, J., Horvath, I., Wittung-Stafshede, P. & Rocha, S. Unraveling amyloid formation paths of Parkinson’s disease protein α-synuclein triggered by anionic vesicles. Q. Rev. Biophys. 50, e3 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Liu, W. et al. Two dimensional crowding effects on protein folding at interfaces observed by chiral vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 22421–22426 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yan, E. C. Y., Wang, Z. & Fu, L. Proteins at interfaces probed by chiral vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 2769–2785 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Perets, E. A. & Yan, E. C. Y. The H2O helix: the chiral water superstructure surrounding DNA. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 683–685 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fadok, V. A. & Henson, P. M. Apoptosis: getting rid of the bodies. Curr. Biol. 8, R693–R695 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Melcrová, A. et al. The complex nature of calcium cation interactions with phospholipid bilayers. Sci. Rep. 6, 38035 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sovago, M., Wurpel, G. W. H., Smits, M., Müller, M. & Bonn, M. Calcium-induced phospholipid ordering depends on surface pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 11079–11084 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Covert, P. A. & Hore, D. K. Geochemical insight from nonlinear optical studies of mineral–water interfaces. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 67, 233–257 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gopalakrishnan, S., Liu, D., Allen, H. C., Kuo, M. & Shultz, M. J. Vibrational spectroscopic studies of aqueous interfaces: salts, acids, bases, and nanodrops. Chem. Rev. 106, 1155–1175 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mashaghi, A. et al. Label-free characterization of biomembranes: from structure to dynamics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 887–900 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rodríguez, Y., Mezei, M. & Osman, R. Association free energy of dipalmitoylphosphatidylserines in a mixed dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine membrane. Biophysical J. 92, 3071–3080 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Javanainen, M. et al. Two cations, two mechanisms: interactions of sodium and calcium with zwitterionic lipid membranes. Chem. Commun. 53, 5380–5383 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Uhríková, D., Kucerka, N., Teixeira, J., Gordeliy, V. & Balgavý, P. Structural changes in dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer promoted by Ca2+ ions: a small-angle neutron scattering study. Chem. Phys. Lipids 155, 80–89 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tsai, H.-H. G. et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of cation–phospholipid clustering in phospholipid bilayers: possible role in stalk formation during membrane fusion. Biochimi. Biophysi. Acta 1818, 2742–2755 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Magarkar, A., Jurkiewicz, P., Allolio, C., Hof, M. & Jungwirth, P. Increased binding of calcium ions at positively curved phospholipid membranes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 518–523 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pedersen, U. R., Leidy, C., Westh, P. & Peters, G. H. The effect of calcium on the properties of charged phospholipid bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1758, 573–582 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Okur, H. I., Tarun, O. B. & Roke, S. Chemistry of lipid membranes from models to living systems: a perspective of hydration, surface potential, curvature, confinement and heterogeneity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12168–12181 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Montal, M. & Mueller, P. Formation of bimolecular membranes from lipid monolayers and a study of their electrical properties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 69, 3561–3566 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    White, S. H., Petersen, D. C., Simon, S. & Yafuso, M. Formation of planar bilayer membranes from lipid monolayers. A critique. Biophysical J. 16, 481–489 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Macias-Romero, C. et al. High throughput second harmonic imaging for label-free biological applications. Opt. Express 22, 31102–31112 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tarun, O. B., Hannesschläger, C., Pohl, P. & Roke, S. Label-free and charge-sensitive dynamic imaging of lipid membrane hydration on millisecond time scales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4081 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wang, Y.-H. et al. Divalent cation-induced cluster formation by polyphosphoinositides in model membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 3387–3395 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    El Kirat, K., Besson, F., Prigent, A.-F., Chauvet, J.-P. & Roux, B. Role of calcium and membrane organization on phospholipase d localization and activity: competition between a soluble and an insolublesubstrate. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 21231–21236 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Smolentsev, N., Lütgebaucks, C., Okur, H. I., de Beer, A. G. F. & Roke, S. Intermolecular headgroup interaction and hydration as driving forces for lipid transmembrane asymmetry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 4053–4060 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Williamson, J. J. & Olmsted, P. D. Registered and antiregistered phase separation of mixed amphiphilic bilayers. Biophys. J. 108, 1963–1976 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lee, C. H., Chang, R. K. & Bloembergen, N. Nonlinear electroreflectance in silicon and silver. Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 167–170 (1967).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ong, S., Zhao, X. & Eisenthal, K. Polarization of water molecules at a charged interface: second harmonic studies of the silica/water interface. Chem. Phys. Lett. 191, 327–335 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Gonella, G., Lütgebaucks, C., de Beer, A. G. F. & Roke, S. Second harmonic and sum-frequency generation from aqueous interfaces is modulated by interference. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 9165–9173 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lütgebaucks, C., Gonella, G. & Roke, S. Optical label-free and model-free probe of the surface potential of nanoscale and microscopic objects in aqueous solution. Phys. Rev. B 94, 195410 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hunter, R. J. Foundations of Colloid Science. (Oxford University Press, 2001).

  47. 47.

    Oshima, H. Theory of Colloid and Interfacial Phenomena (Academic Press, Tokyo, Japan, 2006).

  48. 48.

    Faraudo, J. & Travesset, A. Phosphatidic acid domains in membranes: effect of divalent counterions. Biophysical J. 92, 2806–2818 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Papahadjopoulos, D. & Poste, G. Calcium-induced phase separation and fusion in phospholipid membranes. Biophysical J. 15, 945–948 (1975).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Papahadjopoulos, D., Vail, W. J., Pangborn, W. A. & Poste, G. Studies on membrane fusion. II. Induction of fusion in pure phospholipid membranes by calcium ions and other divalent metals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 448, 265–283 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ito, T. & Ohnishi, S.-I. Ca2+−induced lateral phase separations in phosphatidic acid-phosphatidylcholine membranes. Biochimi. Biophys Acta 352, 29–37 (1974).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Stachowiak, J. C., Brodsky, F. M. & Miller, E. A. A cost-benefit analysis of the physical mechanisms of membrane curvature. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1019–1027 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Marsh, D. Lateral pressure profile, spontaneous curvature frustration, and the incorporation and conformation of proteins in membranes. Biophys. J. 93, 3884–3899 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Bivas, I. Electrostatic and mechanical properties of a flat lipid bilayer containing ionic lipids: Possibility for formation of domains with different surface charges. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 282–283, 423–434 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Steigmann, D. & Agrawal, A. Electromechanics of polarized lipid bilayers. Math. Mech. Complex Syst. 4, 31–54 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Petrov, A. G. Flexoelectricity of model and living membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1561, 1–25 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bivas, I. & Kozlov, M. M. Effect of flexoelectricity on the curvature elasticity of the membrane. Liq. Cryst. 8, 813–817 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Rangamani, P., Agrawal, A., Mandadapu, K. K., Oster, G. & Steigmann, D. J. Interaction between surface shape and intra-surface viscous flow on lipid membranes. Biomech. Modeling Mechanobiol. 12, 833–845 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lipowsky, R. Spontaneous tubulation of membranes and vesicles reveals membrane tension generated by spontaneous curvature. Faraday Discuss. 161, 305–331 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Alvarez, O. & Latorre, R. Voltage-dependent capacitance in lipid bilayers made from monolayers. Biophysical J. 21, 1–17 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Horner, A., Akimov, S. A. & Pohl, P. Long and short lipid molecules experience the same interleaflet drag in lipid bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 268101 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Gutsmann, T., Heimburg, T., Keyser, U., Mahendran, K. R. & Winterhalter, M. Protein reconstitution into freestanding planar lipid membranes for electrophysiological characterization. Nat. Protoc. 10, 188–198 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    HEKA Elektronik. Patchmaster Tutorial. (HEKA Elektronik Dr. Schulze GmbH, 2013). https://www.heka.com/support/support_main.html#tutorials.

  64. 64.

    Tarun, O. B., Eremchev, M. Y. & Roke, S. Interaction of oil and lipids in freestanding lipid bilayer membranes studied with label-free high-throughput wide-field second-harmonic microscopy. Langmuir 34, 11305–11310 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Gomopoulos, N., Lütgebaucks, C., Sun, Q., Macias-Romero, C. & Roke, S. Label-free second harmonic and hyper Rayleigh scattering with high efficiency. Opt. Express 21, 815–821 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank N. Levinger, G. Pabst, P. Wittung-Stafshed, P. Pohl, and E. Yan for useful discussions. This work is supported by the Julia Jacobi Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 200021-140472), and the European Research Council grant 616305.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

O.B.T. performed the experiments, O.B.T. performed the analysis, O.B.T., H.I.O., P.R, and S.R wrote the manuscript. S.R. supervised and conceived the project. O.B.T., H.I.O., and S.R designed the experiments, and P.R. conducted the modeling analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Roke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarun, O.B., Okur, H.I., Rangamani, P. et al. Transient domains of ordered water induced by divalent ions lead to lipid membrane curvature fluctuations. Commun Chem 3, 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-020-0263-8

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing