High-throughput screening for discovery of benchtop separations systems for selected rare earth elements

Abstract

Rare earth (RE) elements (scandium, yttrium, and the lanthanides) are critical for their role in sustainable energy technologies. Problems with their supply chain have motivated research to improve separations methods to recycle these elements from end of life technology. Toward this goal, we report the synthesis and characterization of the ligand tris[(1-hydroxy-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamido)ethyl]amine, H31·TFA (TFA = trifluoroacetic acid), and complexes 1·RE (RE = La, Nd, Dy). A high-throughput experimentation (HTE) screen was developed to quantitatively determine the precipitation of 1·RE as a function of pH as well as equivalents of H31·TFA. This method rapidly determines optimal conditions for the separation of RE mixtures, while minimizing materials consumption. The HTE-predicted conditions are used to achieve the lab-scale separation of Nd/Dy (SFNd/Dy = 213 ± 34) and La/Nd (SFLa/Nd = 16.2 ± 0.2) mixtures in acidic aqueous media.

Introduction

Clean energy technology is increasingly reliant on rare earth elements (RE: Sc, Y, and La–Lu). For example, rare earth (RE) elements are critical components of hybrid car batteries, lighting phosphors, and permanent magnets1,2,3. For these applications, precise blends of individual REs are often required. In recent years, volatility in the global RE market4,5,6 has directed attention toward new methods to recycle REs from waste electronic and electrical equipment (WEEE), since recycling represents only a small fraction of the supply chain for these elements2,7,8,9.

RE separations are performed industrially using countercurrent solvent extraction. This method requires large volumes of solvents due to relatively dilute operating conditions (20 ppm ~ 0.1 M RE)10,11,12. Opportunities remain to improve selectivity for individual rare earths over a single extraction and stripping step. Toward these goals, researchers have developed novel ligands13, ionic liquids14,15, and extractants16,17,18. These findings are potentially compatible with existing countercurrent solvent extraction technology. However, the investment required for countercurrent extraction is a barrier to recycling REs from WEEE, and is only economically viable if the price of rare earth oxides remains high19. There is thus a clear need for alternative RE recycling methods to countercurrent solvent extraction. Selective precipitation of individual REs from mixtures, isolated with a simple filtration step, could meet this need. Such goals are especially pertinent to the binary mixtures of rare earths used in technology. Mixtures of La/Nd are present in nickel metal hydride batteries, and Nd/Dy mixtures are used in permanent magnets7. Recent advances in separating RE mixtures have been accomplished through photochemical reduction20, selective crystallization21,22, chromatographic separations23,24, and the use of supported liquid membranes25,26.

High-throughput experimentation (HTE) refers to running multiple reactions in parallel27. Such methods have been used extensively in catalysis to rapidly screen reaction conditions (e.g., metal ion, ligand, solvent) and require a fraction of the time and materials resources necessary for lab-scale methods28,29,30. HTE methods have been used to assess drug and protein solubility in aqueous media31,32, and to determine conditions for precipitation or protein crystallization33,34. However, HTE methods have not been used to screen RE separations conditions.

Our group previously reported a chelating tris-hydroxylamine proligand tris(2-tert-butylhydroxylamine)benzylamine (H3TriNOx), which demonstrated high separation factors over a single leaching step for pairs of REs (SFNd/Dy ~300, SFLa/Nd ~10)35,36,37,38. From a practical standpoint, the hydroxylamine moieties required the use of strong bases—incompatible with water—to coordinate the RE ions. Another issue was the human and environmental toxicity of the organic solvents used (benzene, toluene, or n-hexane) in that system. To address these limitations, we set out to develop a water-soluble and -stable ligand framework that would deliver comparable separations performance to H3TriNOx. Taking inspiration from the Raymond group’s use of the hydroxypyridone motif (HOPO, Fig. 1) due to its high affinity for REs in aqueous conditions39,40,41,42 and potential biomedical applications43,44,45,46, we synthesized the novel proligand tris[(1-hydroxy-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamido)-ethyl]amine, H3tren-1,2,3-HOPO·TFA (H31·TFA). We hypothesized that exchanging the positions of the hydroxyl and carbonyl moieties would maintain the high affinity of HOPO-derivates for REs while allowing for bridging interactions that were critical for the separations selectivity of our H3TriNOx system35,36,37,38.

Fig. 1: Ligand frameworks.
figure1

H3TriNOx ligand developed by the Schelter group36, HOPO-based ligand developed by the Raymond group40, and ligand developed in this work.

We herein describe the synthesis and characterization of H31·TFA, its related RE complexes (RE = La, Nd, Dy), and its application in the separation of binary mixtures of REs via selective precipitation from aqueous media. To aid in this effort, we have developed a HTE screen to optimize precipitation-based RE separations.

Results

Synthesis of ligand and complexes

The new proligand H3tren-1,2,3-HOPO (H31·TFA), was synthesized in good yield (56%) from 1-hydroxy-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxylic acid and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (tren) and isolated as a trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) salt (Fig. 2, see Supplementary Methods for full synthetic details). Importantly, H31·TFA was synthesized without any protection/deprotection steps commonly used in the synthesis of HOPO-based ligands, which improved atom economy and minimized the total number of steps required47. The ligand H31·TFA has limited stability in saturated aqueous Na2CO3 solution (<24 h), but is stable for >4 months as a solution in 2 M HCl, and indefinitely as a solid.

Fig. 2: Preparation of H31·TFA and 1·RE.
figure2

Synthesis of H31·TFA from 1-hydroxy-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxylic acid and formation of 1·RE (RE = La, Nd, Dy).

The complexes, 1·RE (RE = La, Nd, Dy), were synthesized by stirring a solution of RECl3·nH2O with one equivalent of H31·TFA in H2O for 3 h without addition of base. The 1H NMR spectra in d6-DMSO demonstrated the complexes to be C3v-symmetric in solution. X-ray diffraction analysis of crystals grown by vapor diffusion of H2O into concentrated dimethylformamide (DMF) solutions revealed nearly isostructural motifs for the three RE complexes. The lanthanide cations were 8-coordinate and bound to all 6 oxygen atoms of the hydroxypyridone rings. The coordination sphere included an apical DMF molecule and an equatorial water molecule (Fig. 3). The crystal packing revealed the formation of 1-D chains through the water molecules H-bonding network (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: Solid state structures of H31·TFA and 1·RE.
figure3

Thermal ellipsoid plots of H31·TFA (a), 1·La(DMF)(H2O) (b), 1·Nd(DMF)(H2O) (c), and 1·Dy(DMF)(H2O) (d).

While the solid-state speciation of all 1·RE complexes was similar, we noticed a marked dependence on the solution pH for the precipitations of the individual complexes, which may be due to differences in the pKa values of the ligand among the RE complexes. For example, precipitation from 1 M HCl could be achieved for RE = Nd, Dy, but not La. This prompted investigation into use of H31·TFA as a material for the separation of RE mixtures in acidic media.

High-throughput experimentation

HTE methods allow for the rapid screening of multiple reaction variables while minimizing resource consumption. Here, we were interested in developing an assay to quantify the precipitation of 1·RE as a function of pH. We were particularly interested in determining the conditions with the largest difference in precipitation among REs. These conditions would theoretically yield the greatest separation of RE mixtures.

Precipitation experiments were performed in 96-well plates at 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 1.50, 2.00 M HCl with 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 equivalents of H31·TFA to RECl3 (RE = La, Nd, Dy) (Fig. 4). The effect of chloride concentration was also investigated using 1.0 equivalent of H31·TFA with 1.00 M KCl(aq) as a solvent (see Supplementary Methods for details). Combined, this provided 19 different reaction conditions for each RE. The reaction mixtures were agitated in well plates for 24 h, then filtered in parallel using filter plates. The filtrates were analyzed for RE-content using inductively-coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), and yields calculated from these values (see Supplementary Eq. 1 for yield calculation). The results of the assay are summarized in Fig. 4c.

Fig. 4: HTE screening.
figure4

a General schematic for the HTE precipitation screen. b Image of the precipitation screen. c Results from the HTE precipitation screen. Error bars represent the standard deviation between three trials.

The amount of RE precipitated decreased with increasing HCl concentration from 0.10 M to 2.00 M. Using 1.00 M KCl(aq) as solvent resulted in similar precipitation results as 0.10 M HCl. These results suggested that precipitation is inhibited by increasing proton concentration in solution, and that the chloride anion does not significantly inhibit 1·RE formation and precipitation. Increased yields of extracted RE in the solid portion were observed with increasing equivalents of H31·TFA.

Surprising here was the notable difference in precipitation behavior among the three RE complexes. 1·La ceased to precipitate from solution starting at 0.25 M HCl, as evidenced by a yield ~0%, where 1·Nd and 1·Dy continued to precipitate from solution through 1.00 M HCl and 2.00 M HCl, respectively. These data suggested it should be possible to selectively precipitate a single RE from a mixture of REs by controlling the pH, through complexation with the ligand.

Separations experiments based on HTE

According to the HTE data, the largest difference in RE precipitation for Nd and Dy occurred at 1.50 M HCl using 2.0 equivalents H31·TFA. To validate these conditions for lab scale separations experiments, we first examined the separation of 1:1 Nd/Dy mixtures using one equivalent of H31·TFA. Allowing the reaction mixture to stir in neutral water for 1 h prior to filtration through a fine porosity sintered glass frit resulted in SFNd/Dy = 28.1 ± 0.8 (Table 1, Entry 1). Repeating the experiment with 1.0 M HCl as the solvent resulted in SFNd/Dy = 28.9 ± 3.2 (Table 1, Entry 2), which is consistent within error. However, the enrichment factor of the solid portion for 1.0 M HCl is double that of neutral water as solvent. This result suggested that less 1·Nd precipitated from solution—as predicted by the HTE data—resulting in a more pure solid phase. Using two equivalents of H31·TFA improved the separations achieved in 1.0 M HCl to SFNd/Dy = 46.9 ± 4.9 (Table 1, Entry 3). Two equivalents of H31·TFA in 1.5 M HCl further improved the separation factor from 1:1 Nd/Dy mixtures to SFNd/Dy = 71.4 ± 8.0 (Table 1, Entry 4). Together, these preparatory-scale results validated the HTE-predicted optimal conditions for separations of 1:1 mixtures of Nd/Dy.

Table 1 Optimization of rare earth separations conditions using H31·TFA.

To further optimize the Nd/Dy separations, we investigated the effect of reaction time and metal concentration. Extending the reaction time to 3 or 24 h resulted in SFNd/Dy = 100 ± 6 and 128 ± 21, respectively (Table 1, Entries 5, 7). The 3 h experiment was repeated at double the RE concentration in solution—achieved by eliminating half of the volume of acid—resulting in SFNd/Dy =  138 ± 29 (Table 1, Entry 6). The 24 h and concentrated 3 h separations results were identical, within error. While the separation factors were equivalent, it is worth noting that the enrichment factors of the solid (EFs) was halved and the enrichment factor of the filtrate (EFf) was doubled for the shorter, more concentrated experiment as compared to the 24 h experiment. Increasing the concentration and allowing the experiment to run for 24 h resulted in the highest separations factor achieved, SFNd/Dy = 213 ± 34 (Table 1, Entry 8). From these experiments, 78% of 1·Dy was recovered in the solid portion, and 88% of the Nd-enriched filtrate could be recovered, revealing there to be minimal loss of material during the filtration process. This result demonstrated the achievement of an effective, efficient separation of neodymium and dysprosium with minimal quantities of dilute acid followed by only a quick rinse using minimal quantities of water. By comparison, the commercially relevant 2-ethylhexyl-mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester phosphonic acid (HEHEHP) and CYANEX® 572 deliver calculated separations of SFNd/Dy = 50 and 69.5, respectively (Table 2)48. Under the conditions reported, these extractants require more than double the volume of solvent, as well as an organic phase to achieve SFNd/Dy values less than one third of that achieved using H31·TFA. However, it is worth noting that performance of phosphorous-based extractants is highly dependent on the diluents used, with some reports achieving comparable separations to H31·TFA10,11,12.

Table 2 Comparison of HEHEHP and CYANEX® 572 with H31·TFA.

To test the utility of these conditions in application to relevant mixtures in electronic waste, we made a 5% Dy mixture in Nd, and added 2 equivalents of H31·TFA per Dy. Surprisingly, no precipitation was observed within 24 h. Slowly adjusting the acid concentration with 1.0 M NaOH to ~1.25 M HCl eventually resulted in the formation of a precipitate. The solid was enriched to 24.7 ± 2.9% in dysprosium—a fivefold increase from the starting mixture in one step (Table 1, Entry 9). The filtrate did not exhibit significant enrichment in neodymium.

The optimized Nd/Dy separation conditions were applied to La/Nd mixtures. The largest difference in precipitation from the high-throughput screen was achieved using 0.25 M HCl as the solvent and 2 equivalents H31·TFA. This resulted in SFLa/Nd = 16.2 ± 0.2 (Table 1, Entry 10). This value is greater than the separations achieved by HEHEHP and CYANEX® 572, SFLa/Nd = 9.0 and 14.6, respectively, require the use of an organic diluent, and greater quantities of extractant (Table 2). Using H31·TFA, the enrichment of the solid was low, EFs = 1.57 ± 0.11, while the enrichment of the filtrate was much greater, EFf = 10.4 ± 0.7 (Table 1, Entry 10). Evidently, a significant portion of lanthanum precipitated, which lowered EFs and resulted in a good EFf. Optimization of reaction times and metal concentrations will further improve the performance of H31·TFA for the separation of La/Nd mixtures.

Ligand recovery

Mirroring ligand-stripping practices commonly employed in solvent extraction, we were interested in recovering H31 from the purified RE salts for reuse in additional separations. We found that ~20 mg 1·Dy could be dissolved in 0.4 mL 12 M HCl, presumably forming H31·HCl and DyCl3·nH2O in solution. Addition of 2.0 mL EtOH resulted in the formation of a precipitate, which was determined to be H31 with a residual ~12% 1·Dy by 1H NMR analysis (see Supplementary Methods for experimental details). Considering the ligand could be reused for additional Nd/Dy separations, this minor impurity does not pose an operational issue. This stripping step was able to recover 84% of the ligand and 86% DyCl3 while using minimal solvent volumes.

Discussion

H31·TFA and its related complexes, 1·RE (RE = La, Nd, Dy), were synthesized in good yields and characterized in solution by 1H NMR spectroscopy and in the solid state using single crystal X-ray analysis. H31·TFA exhibits high stability under acidic conditions required for solubilizing RE oxides. We have demonstrated the effect of acid concentration and equivalents of H31·TFA on the precipitation of 1·RE from solution using HTE screening. From this screen, we found that La and Nd did not precipitate from solutions at 0.25 M and 1.50 M HCl, respectively, whereas Dy precipitated from up to 2.00 M HCl solutions. These results provided optimal reaction conditions for the separation of 1:1 RE mixtures in a single complexation/separation step. This resulted in SFNd/Dy = 213 ± 34 and SFLa/Nd = 16.2 ± 0.2. This method was also applied to 5% Dy in Nd mixtures, and enriched the solid to ~25% Dy in a single step. The ligand could be recovered in 84% yield with only minor residual 1·Dy under mild conditions. Our system was found to be comparable to and in some cases outperform currently relevant industrial countercurrent solvent extractants HEHEHP and CYANEX® 572 in terms of separations achieved in a single step, and total solvent usage. The origin of the selectivity of this system is potentially due to differences in the pKa values of the ligand among the different REs, which results in the formation of species with differing solubility at varying pHs. Preliminary results suggest that the filtrate from the optimized Nd/Dy separations mixture comprised a more complicated speciation than simple chloride salts; evident in the infrared spectra of the solid and filtrate portions obtained from the separations experiments (Supplementary Figs. 14 and 15). Expanded work to identify the origin of selectivity of this system are on-going.

The HTE methodology can easily be applied to other water-soluble ligands to rapidly screen conditions for the separation of RE mixtures creating minimal waste, an area of ongoing interest in our group.

Methods

High throughput precipitation screening

High throughput precipitation screening experiments were performed in 96-well reaction plates with a maximum volume of 2.00 mL per well. Experimental wells (EW) were loaded with 250 μL of the appropriate individual RECl3 (66 mM, RE = La, Nd, Dy) solution followed by 600 μL of the appropriate ligand solution for a total volume of 850 μL ([RE]initial = 19.4 mM). Each set of experimental conditions were replicated in triplicate. Positive control (PC) wells were loaded with 250 μL of all three RECl3 (RE = La, Nd, Dy) solutions and 100 μL solvent for a total volume of 850 μL and were placed after every nine experimental wells. The well plate was covered with an adhesive aluminum foil cover to prevent solvent evaporation and cross-contamination between wells, then placed on an innova2180 platform shaker moving at 330 RPM for 24 hours. The reaction plate was centrifuged at 2000 RPM on a GeneVac EZ-2 Personal Evaporator for 1 h. The supernatant was transferred to a 96-well filter plate with a maximum volume of 1.00 mL per well. Dynamic vacuum was applied, and the filtrate collected in a 96-well collection plate with a maximum volume of 2.00 mL per well. The filtrate was analyzed for metal content by ICP-OES. See Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Table 1 for ICP-OES details. See Supplementary Eq. 1 for yield calculation.

General procedure for separation of rare earth mixtures

To a stirring solution of H31·TFA (1–2 equivalents) in the appropriate solvent (3.00 mL) was added a solution of RE1Cl3·nH2O (0.083 mmol) and RE2Cl3·nH2O (0.083 mmol) in the same solvent (1.25 mL). At the end of the reaction time (1–24 h), the mixture was filtered through a fine porosity sintered glass frit, and the solid washed twice with H2O (0.5–1.0 mL), and once with acetone (0.5 mL, optional wash). The solid was dried on the frit, and the filtrate evaporated. The RE content of the solid and filtrate portions was analyzed by ICP-OES. All separation experiments were performed in triplicate. See ESI for calculation of enrichment and separations factors.

Data availability

Data to support the conclusions in this paper are available in the main text or the supplementary materials (NMR spectra, Supplemental Figs. 213; FT-IR spectra, Supplemental Figs. 14 and 15) and are available from the authors upon reasonable request. The X-ray crystallographic coordinates for structures reported in this study have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), under deposition numbers 1906140-1906143. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

References

  1. 1.

    Charalampides, G., Vatalis, K. I., Apostoplos, B. & Ploutarch-Nikolas, B. Rare earth elements: industrial applications and economic dependency of Europe. Proc. Econ. Finan. 24, 126–135 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    King, A. H., Eggert, R. G. & Gschneidner, K. A. Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, Vol. 50, 19–46 (Elsevier, 2016).

  3. 3.

    Nelson, J. J. M. & Schelter, E. J. Sustainable inorganic chemistry: metal separations for recycling. Inorg. Chem. 58, 979–990 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Golev, A., Scott, M., Erskine, P. D., Ali, S. H. & Ballantyne, G. R. Rare earths supply chains: Current status, constraints and opportunities. Resour. Policy 41, 52–59 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fernandez, V. Rare-earth elements market: a historical and financial perspective. Resour. Policy 53, 26–45 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hou, W., Liu, H., Wang, H. & Wu, F. Structure and patterns of the international rare earths trade: a complex network analysis. Resour. Policy 55, 133–142 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Binnemans, K. et al. Recycling of rare earths: a critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 51, 1–22 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cheisson, T. & Schelter, E. J. Rare earth elements: Mendeleev's bane, modern marvels. Science 363, 489–493 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tanaka, M., Oki, T., Koyama, K., Narita, H. & Oishi, T. Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, Vol. 43, 159–211 (Elsevier, 2013).

  10. 10.

    Philip Horwitz, E., McAlister, D. R. & Dietz, M. L. Extraction chromatography versus solvent extraction: how similar are they? Sep. Sci. Technol. 41, 2163–2182 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Peppard, D. F., Mason, G. W., Maier, J. L. & Driscoll, W. J. Fractional extraction of the lanthanides as their di-alkyl orthophosphates. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 4, 334–343 (1957).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kubota, F., Goto, M. & Nakashio, F. Extraction of rare earth metals with 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester in the presence of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid in aqueous phase. Solvent Extraction Ion-. Exch. 11, 437–453 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tyumentsev, M. S. et al. The solvent extraction of rare earth elements from nitrate media with novel polyamides containing malonamide groups. Hydrometallurgy 164, 24–30 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Riaño, S. & Binnemans, K. Extraction and separation of neodymium and dysprosium from used NdFeB magnets: an application of ionic liquids in solvent extraction towards the recycling of magnets. Green. Chem. 17, 2931–2942 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Boyd, R. et al. Ionic liquids tethered to a preorganised 1,2-diamide motif for extraction of lanthanides. Green Chem21, 2583–2588 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sun, X. & Waters, K. E. Synergistic effect between bifunctional ionic liquids and a molecular extractant for lanthanide separation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2, 2758–2764 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Schaeffer, N., Grimes, S. & Cheeseman, C. Interactions between trivalent rare earth oxides and mixed [Hbet][Tf2N]:H2O systems in the development of a one-step process for the separation of light from heavy rare earth elements. Inorg. Chim. Acta 439, 55–60 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kuang, S. & Liao, W. Progress in the extraction and separation of rare earths and related metals with novel extractants: a review. Sci. China.: Technol. Sci. 61, 1319–1328 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Favot, M. & Massarutto, A. Rare-earth elements in the circular economy: the case of yttrium. J. Environ. Manag. 240, 504–510 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Van den Bogaert, B., Havaux, D., Binnemans, K. & Van Gerven, T. Photochemical recycling of europium from Eu/Y mixtures in red lamp phosphor waste streams. Green. Chem. 17, 2180–2187 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yin, X. et al. Rare earth separations by selective borate crystallization. Nat. Commun. 8, 14438 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tasaki-Handa, Y. et al. Selective crystallization of phosphoester coordination polymer for the separation of neodymium and dysprosium: a thermodynamic approach. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 12730–12735 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bertelsen, E. R. et al. Microcolumn lanthanide separation using bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid functionalized ordered mesoporous carbon materials. J. Chromatogr. A 1595, 248–256 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Avdibegović, D., Regadío, M. & Binnemans, K. Efficient separation of rare earths recovered by a supported ionic liquid from bauxite residue leachate. RSC Adv. 8, 11886–11893 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rathore, N. S., Sastre, A. M. & Pabby, A. K. Membrane assisted liquid extraction of actinides and remediation of nuclear waste: a review. J. Membr. Sci. Res 2, 2–13 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kim, D. et al. Selective extraction of rare earth elements from permanent magnet scraps with membrane solvent extraction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 9452–9459 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mennen, S. M. et al. The evolution of high-throughput experimentation in pharmaceutical development and perspectives on the future. Org. Process Res. Dev. 23, 1213–1242 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shevlin, M. Practical high-throughput experimentation for chemists. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 601–607 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Krska, S. W., DiRocco, D. A., Dreher, S. D. & Shevlin, M. The evolution of chemical high-throughput experimentation to address challenging problems in pharmaceutical synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2976–2985 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Allen, C. L., Leitch, D. C., Anson, M. S. & Zajac, M. A. The power and accessibility of high-throughput methods for catalysis research. Nat. Catal. 2, 2–4 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gibson, T. J. et al. Application of a high-throughput screening procedure with PEG-induced precipitation to compare relative protein solubility during formulation development with IgG1 monoclonal antibodies. J. Pharm. Sci. 100, 1009–1021 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Colclough, N. et al. High throughput solubility determination with application to selection of compounds for fragment screening. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16, 6611–6616 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Knevelman, C., Davies, J., Allen, L. & Titchener-Hooker, N. J. High-throughput screening techniques for rapid PEG-based precipitation of IgG4 mAb from clarified cell culture supernatant. Biotechnol. Prog. 26, 697–705 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jones, H. G. et al. Iterative screen optimization maximizes the efficiency of macromolecular crystallization. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. F: Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 75, 123–131 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bogart, J. A. et al. Accomplishing simple, solubility-based separations of rare earth elements with complexes bearing size-sensitive molecular apertures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14887–14892 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bogart, J. A., Lippincott, C. A., Carroll, P. J. & Schelter, E. J. An operationally simple method for separating the rare-earth elements neodymium and dysprosium. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 8222–8225 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cheisson, T., Cole, B. E., Manor, B. C., Carroll, P. J. & Schelter, E. J. Phosphoryl-ligand adducts of rare earth-trinox complexes: systematic studies and implications for separations chemistry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 4993–5001 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cole, B. E. et al. A molecular basis to rare earth separations for recycling: tuning the TriNOx ligand properties for improved performance. Chem. Commun. 54, 10276–10279 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Xu, J., Franklin, S. J., Whisenhunt, D. W. & Raymond, K. N. Gadolinium complex of tris[(3-hydroxy-1-methyl- 2-oxo-1,2-didehydropyridine-4-carboxamido)ethyl]-amine: a new class of gadolinium magnetic resonance relaxation agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 7245–7246 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jocher, C. J. et al. 1,2-Hydroxypyridonates as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: TREN-1,2-HOPO. Inorg. Chem. 46, 9182–9191 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Datta, A. & Raymond, K. N. Gd-hydroxypyridinone (HOPO)-based high-relaxivity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 938–947 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Götzke, L. et al. Coordination chemistry of f-block metal ions with ligands bearing bio-relevant functional groups. Coord. Chem. Rev. 386, 267–309 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Abergel, R. J. et al. Biomimetic actinide chelators: an update on the preclinical development of the orally active hydroxypyridonate decorporation agents 3,4,3-LI(1,2-HOPO) and 5-LIO(Me-3,2-HOPO). Health Phys. 99, 401–407 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rees, J. A. et al. Evaluating the potential of chelation therapy to prevent and treat gadolinium deposition from MRI contrast agents. Sci. Rep. 8, 4419 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Dai, L. et al. Breaking the 1,2-HOPO barrier with a cyclen backbone for more efficient sensitization of Eu(iii) luminescence and unprecedented two-photon excitation properties. Chem. Sci. 10, 4550–4559 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Younes, A. et al. Is hydroxypyridonate 3,4,3-LI(1,2-HOPO) a good competitor of fetuin for uranyl metabolism? Metallomics 11, 496–507 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cilibrizzi, A. et al. Hydroxypyridinone journey into metal chelation. Chem. Rev. 118, 7657–7701 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Solvay. CYANEX® 572 Product Data Sheet.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the University of Pennsylvania and the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Separation Science program under Award DE-SC0017259. We acknowledge the Center for Actinide Science and Technology (CAST), an Energy Frontier Research Center (EFRC) funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (DE-SC0016568) for support of T.C.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.J.M.N., T.C. and E.J.S. conceived the project and designed the experiments. J.J.M.N. and H.J.R. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. M.R.G. and P.J.C. performed X-ray crystallography. J.J.M.N., T.C. and E.J.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and approved of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Schelter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

There authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelson, J.J.M., Cheisson, T., Rugh, H.J. et al. High-throughput screening for discovery of benchtop separations systems for selected rare earth elements. Commun Chem 3, 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-019-0253-x

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing