Resurrection of efficient Precambrian endoglucanases for lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis

Abstract

Cellulases catalyze the hydrolysis of cellulose. Improving their catalytic efficiency is a long-standing goal in biotechnology given the interest in lignocellulosic biomass decomposition. Although methods based on sequence alteration exist, improving cellulases is still a challenge. Here we show that Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction can “resurrect” efficient cellulases. This technique reconstructs enzymes from extinct organisms that lived in the harsh environments of ancient Earth. We obtain ancestral bacterial endoglucanases from the late Archean eon that efficiently work in a broad range of temperatures (30–90 °C), pH values (4–10). The oldest enzyme (~2800 million years) processes different lignocellulosic substrates, showing processive activity and doubling the activity of modern enzymes in some conditions. We solve its crystal structure to 1.45 Å which, together with molecular dynamics simulations, uncovers key features underlying its activity. This ancestral endoglucanase shows good synergy in combination with other lignocellulosic enzymes as well as when integrated into a bacterial cellulosome.

Introduction

Cellulose is one of the major components in plant cell walls and is the most abundant organic polymer on the planet1. This widespread substrate offers a great opportunity to generate bioproducts, such as biofuels and nanocellulose. There is an enormous variety of raw materials rich in cellulose, such as agricultural, industrial, and urban wastes that can be used as sources for cellulose2,3. However, generating bioproducts from cellulose is still complex and expensive. Cellulose is a highly recalcitrant substrate difficult to obtain from plant cell walls, because it is protected by hemicellulose and lignin. In many processes, cellulases must withstand the harsh conditions of the industrial bioconversion process, such as high temperature, generally above 50 °C, and low or high pH4,5. The lower efficiency of the enzymes under these conditions makes the saccharification process a critical bottleneck in the bioconversion of cellulose. Increasing the thermal operability and activity of cellulases is perhaps the most investigated aspect for their industrial implementation6,7.

In order to improve cellulases, several strategies ranging from rational and computational design to de novo enzyme design and directed evolution have been implemented, aimed at obtaining biocatalysts with improved performance5,8,9. Despite these advances, the limitations of engineered cellulases under the highly demanding industrial conditions (in terms of pH, temperatures, the presence of nonconventional media, and more) are still a barrier that must be overcome. The natural trade-off between activity and stability of proteins makes extremely complicated to enhance, for instance, the temperature and pH operability, the expression level or the activity of enzymes, all or at least some of them at once. The development of a strategy capable of finding more suitable blueprints, whereby improving the catalytic properties of enzymes in a cost-efficient manner, may revolutionize the biotechnology and chemical industries.

In the past decade or so, the so-called ancestral sequence resurrection technique (ASR) has been used to study the evolution of genes and proteins10,11,12. ASR utilizes sequences of proteins or genes from different species to create phylogenetic relationships, from which the sequences of their ancestors can be predicted and reconstructed in the laboratory13. Using a diverse combination of sequences, it is even possible to reconstruct Precambrian proteins belonging to organisms that lived shortly after the origin of life10,11. Reconstructed ancestral proteins have displayed enhanced thermal or mechanical stability, better pH response, improved activity and expression level, chemical promiscuity, and in some cases, all of these at once10,11,12,14. These traits are thought to reflect the conditions in which these ancestral proteins lived. Nevertheless, the molecular bases behind the high efficiency of ancestral enzymes are not fully understood. In addition, ancestral enzymes have been suggested to work like a “Swiss army knife” due to their versatility, provided that primitive cells likely relied on a limited but efficient set of enzymes that worked as generalists rather than as specialists15. Precambrian enzymes from the Hadean and Archean eons (older than 2500 million years) were adapted to work under temperature, pH, and environmental conditions that often resemble those of industrial settings11. Following this assumption, we propose ASR as a paleoenzymology method to generate efficient enzymes beyond the evolutionary implications.

In this work, we test the ability of ASR to generate efficient enzymes by reconstructing ancestral endoglucanases (EG) from ~1.7- to 2.8-billion-year-old bacterial species. The ancestral EGs showed higher activity than those of contemporary EGs under a broad range of temperatures and pH. The oldest enzyme works well with various substrates even displaying processive endoglucanase and exoglucanase activity. The ancestral EG enzyme also displays higher efficiency when integrated into a bacterial cellulosome, a macromolecular machine for cellulose degradation16, which has been also proposed for industrial implementation8,17. To investigate the determinants of its activity, we solve the crystal structure to 1.45 Å, demonstrating that the fold is highly conserved. Interestingly, using the solved structure, we perform atomistic molecular dynamics simulations (MD) in the presence of substrate, which suggest that the balance between accessibility and dynamics of the substrate on the enzyme active site seems to play an important role on the high efficiency of the ancestral endoglucanase. Surprisingly, we determine that an efficient bioconversion can be potentially achieved by reconstructing very few enzymes as compared with other methodologies, where hundreds of variants need to be tested. This work represents a proof of concept, which may open new avenues toward efficient enzyme improvement in a single step.

Results

Ancestral sequence reconstruction of bacterial EG

To generate ancestral sequences of bacterial EG enzymes, we use 32 EG Cel5A sequences from extant bacteria (see the ID list of extant sequences in Supplementary Note 1), which are obtained from the UniProt database (www.uniprot.org), using the sequence form Bacillus subtilis (Bs_EG) as query. We target EG from family Cel5A because of their interest in biotechnology industry. EG enzymes are present in different bacterial phyla, such as Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria, which diverged more than 3 billion years ago (~3000 million years ago), indicating that these enzymes are ancient and were present in organisms that lived in the Archean eon. We select sequences from these three phyla. A sequence alignment is generated, and the catalytic domains of all the sequences are well resolved, forming a block with no major gaps or unstructured portions. In contrast, the carbohydrate-binding module (CBM), a smaller subunit responsible for cellulose binding, does not align well, as some sequences had the CBM at the C terminus, while others have it at the N terminus, and there are numerous gaps. In addition, not all the sequences contain a CBM. As the CBM is poorly aligned, we conclude that this module is heterogeneous and poorly conserved within the family 5 of cellulases. Therefore, we focus on the catalytic region.

Using the block of catalytic domains, we construct a phylogenetic chronogram using Bayesian inference18, in which the three bacterial phyla are well resolved (Fig. 1). We date the phylogenetic tree using data from the Time Tree of Life (TTOL)19. Using the alignment and tree, we reconstruct the most likely ancestral sequence for each node. We select three nodes, the oldest node belonging to the last Firmicutes common ancestor (LFCA) that lived ~2.8 billion years ago. We speculate that this may have been one of the earliest cellulase enzymes. This is consistent with the idea that the earliest cellulose producers were likely bacteria before the endosymbiotic transfer of cellulose synthase to eukaryotic plant cells20. The second node belongs to the last Clostridia common ancestor (LCCA), which is ~2.1 billion years old; the third one from the last Actinobacteria common ancestor (LACA), ~1.7 billion years old. The ancestral reconstruction utilizes a maximum-likelihood assignment at each site for the residue, with the highest posterior probability. The posterior probabilities of all 297 sites are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1. The average posterior probability values are 0.91–0.99, which ensures reliability of the reconstruction. Overall, the ancestral sequences display between 50% and 73% identity with respect to the modern Bs-EG. The mutations in the ancestral sequences with respect to the modern Bs_EG are distributed all over the sequence (Supplementary Fig. 2). To reconstruct the ancestral EGs, the gene sequences of the domains are synthesized and cloned into an expression vector and expressed in the E. coli strain BL21 (DE3). The ancestral EG enzymes demonstrate a high level of expression, as shown by SDS/PAGE for LFCA_EG (Supplementary Fig. 3). The reason behind this high expression level is unknown, but it seems to be a common feature among ancestral proteins.

Fig. 1
figure1

Uncorrelated relaxed clock chronogram for bacterial endoglucanases Cel5A. A total of 32 sequences were used from three different phyla, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes. The different species are indicated. UniProt identification codes can be found in Supplementary Table 3. Divergence times were estimated using Bayesian inference and information from the Time Tree of Life19. Geological scale and times are indicated in the upper bar. The internal node corresponding to the last Firmicutes common ancestor (LFCA), last Clostridia common ancestor (LCCA), and the last Actinobacteria common ancestor (LACA) was selected for reconstruction and laboratory testing

Endoglucanase activity measurements

To test the performance of the ancestral enzymes, we carry out activity assays under different conditions. We first test enzyme activity in the temperature range 30–90 °C and compare the activity of the reconstructed enzymes with those of contemporary enzymes from Thermotoga maritima (Tm_EG) and Bs_EG, at the same temperatures. Both enzymes belong to the Glycoside Hydrolase Family 5 (GH5). Tm_EG is interesting because T. maritima is a hyperthermophilic organism that lives at temperatures up to 90 °C; T. maritima is one of the most extremophile bacteria known today. The thermal range tested is broader that the typical testing range, which normally covers from 40 to 70 °C. We first use a standard soluble substrate such as carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), using the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay to assess the release of reducing sugars by EGs21. The oldest ancestral LFCA_EG and LCCA_EG shows higher activity than the modern enzymes, with soluble CMC at all temperatures until 70 °C. At 80 and 90 °C, the activity of these enzymes is similar to that of the hyperthermophile Tm_EG (Fig. 2a). Interestingly, such high operational temperature has only been achieved by contemporary archaeal cellulases7.

Fig. 2
figure2

Activity assays for endoglucanase enzymes. a Endoglucanase activity as a function of temperature for LFCA_EG, LCCA_EG, LACA_EG, T. maritima (Tm_EG), and B. subtilis (Bs_EG) at pH 4.8. Enzyme dosage used was 5 mg/g of glucan. The activity was determined using the CMC/DNS method. b Endoglucanase activity as a function of pH for the same endocellulases at 70 °C. Experiments were carried out using different buffer solutions depending on pH range (see the “Methods” section). c Relative activity of the ancestral enzymes and Bs_EG measured at 50 °C plotted vs. evolutionary time. Dashed line is intended to guide the eye. In the right axis, seawater paleotemperature trend as inferred from δ18O isotopes in seawater cherts vs. time. d Kinetics of enzyme catalysis fitted to Michaelis–Menten equation for parameter determination. The resulting kinetic parameters are reported in Table 1. The ancestral EG displays the highest relation kcat/Km indicating higher efficiency. e Pre-incubation experiments at different temperatures conducted for 30 min. Residual activity was determined on CMC for 30 min at 60 °C using DNS. Relative activity is determined for each individual enzyme. Each enzyme was pre-incubated at its best performing pH. f Ratios of soluble to insoluble reducing sugars generated using PASC as a substrate by LFCA_EG, Tm_EG, and Bs_EG, respectively. For each data point, three to five replicates were collected. The average ± S.D. values are shown for each measurement

Another important factor in cellulose hydrolysis is the pH at which the reaction is carried out. The pretreatment of lignocellulosic material can be performed at low or high pH values22. Therefore, improving cellulase activity in a broad range of pH values is of interest from an industrial point of view, as it would minimize the need for neutralization and the associated cost. We determine the activity of the reconstructed cellulases from pH 4 to 10 at 50 °C using CMC. LFCA_EG and LCCA_EG show the highest activities (Fig. 2b). We find that the younger LACA_EG performs like Tm_EG.

From the temperature profiles in Fig. 2a, we wonder whether any evolutionary trend can be devised. We plot the relative activity of the ancestral enzymes plus Bs_Eg against the evolutionary time and a clear decreasing trend can be observed (Fig. 2c). We do this at 50 °C, but the same is true for most temperatures. Surprisingly, this trend runs parallel to the cooling trend of seawater temperature over the past 3.5 By, as determined from δ18O in marine cherts23, which suggests that enzyme stability, activity, and environmental temperature are all linked. This trend seems to be general in ancestral protein stability24,25, but we prove it here for activity.

From the three ancestral enzymes, we take the most efficient one, i.e., LFCA_EG, for further experimental testing. We study the kinetics of the enzymatic reaction for the studied cellulases by applying the Michaelis–Menten model. From the experimental data in Fig. 2c, we determine that the KM, a measure of affinity, is quite similar for the three enzymes although slightly lower for LFCA_EG (1.25 mg mL−1). The highest turnover rate, kcat, corresponds to the ancestral LFCA_EG (0.04 s−1). Similarly, the highest catalytic efficiency, kcat/KM, is also achieved by LFCA_EG (0.032 mL mg−1 s−1), doubling the value of the modern enzymes. The kinetic parameters determined from the plot are shown in Table 1. Overall, these parameters indicate that LFCA_EG shows a higher substrate affinity, is faster, and more efficient that the modern enzymes.

Table 1 Kinetic parameters of the cellulases determined from the Michaelis–Menten plot in Fig. 2c

We also evaluate how stable to temperature incubation is the ancestral EG, compared with Tm_EG and Bs_EG. We determine the T50 value (defined as the temperature at which the enzyme loses half of its activity after 30 min of incubation). T50 values of 85, 79, and 68 °C are obtained for Tm_EG, LFCA_EG, and Bs_EG, respectively. The activity is determined at 60 °C after the incubation (Fig. 2d). The ancestral EG was performed short behind the extremophile Tm_EG, highlighting its thermophilic nature.

Apart from their resistance to temperature and pH, ancestral enzymes have been suggested to show chemical promiscuity, which might be reflected in the ability to operate over more than one substrate or in the ability to display more than one mechanism of action14. An interesting promiscuous behavior in EG is to display processive activity, that is, to show both endoglucanase and exoglucanase activity. This is typical for EG from family GH9. We decide to test our LFCA_EG for such processive activity by measuring the relation between soluble and insoluble sugars in the reaction. Surprisingly, LFCA_EG shows a higher ratio of soluble to insoluble sugars after 30 min of incubation, as compared with Tm_EG and Bs_EG that remain nearly constant at all times (Fig. 2e). The measured ratio for LFCA_EG is similar to that of other natural or designed EG with processive activity26. Although some hydrolases from family GH5 have been shown to be processive27, they have not been included in our phylogeny, which makes the processivity of the ancestral LFCA_EG a surprising feature.

Besides bacterial cellulase, we also test our LFCA_EG against a fungal EG, given that fungal EG is much widely used than bacterial ones in biotechnological applications. We compare LFCA_EG with endoglucanase from Trichoderma reesei from family Cel5A (Tr_EG). From the activity experiments, we still observe that the ancestral LFCA_EG shows better performance in most conditions tested (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 1). This result shows that designer bacterial EGs might be a good alternative to fungal ones, due to their diversity, complexity, thermal and pH operability, and even higher activity, as well as the high growth rate of bacteria8.

However, the high performance of LFCA_EG is not only limited to a soluble laboratory substrate such as CMC. In industry, the actual interest resides on the hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose28. For this reason, we compare the activity of the EG enzymes using a microcrystalline substrate such as Avicel. Avicel requires long digestion times. We perform the assay at different times ranging from 4 to 72 h. For the assay, we use LFCA_EG in two forms, only the catalytic domain and the catalytic domain incorporating a CBM from Clostridium thermocellum, since an ancestral CBM cannot be reconstructed, as we have discussed. From Fig. 3a, we can observe that the maximum conversion percentage corresponds to the LFCA_EG form incorporating the CBM, but it is also surprising that the LFCA_EG catalytic domain by itself also displays remarkable activity against Avicel. The conversion at 70 h of hydrolysis reaches 60% for LFCA_EG with CBM, 45% for LFCA_EG, and around 25% for Tm_EG and Bs_EG, at equal enzyme load.

Fig. 3
figure3

Hydrolysis of crystalline and lignocellulosic substrates. a Hydrolysis of crystalline substrate Avicel for LFCA_EG with or without CBM, Tm_EG, and Bs_EG. The ancestral LFCA_EG incorporating the CBM clearly shows a high efficiency for long-time digestion of crystalline Avicel. Enzyme dosage was 15 mg/g of glucan. b Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrate cardboard, c newspaper, and d pine softwood. Experiments were carried out with EG enzymes alone or in combination with the evolved laccase variant from M. thermophila and xylanase from T. viride. Hydrolysis was carried out for 1 h at 50 °C and pH 4.8 in a total volume of 500 µL. EG enzyme dosage was 14 mg/g of glucan for cardboard and 15 mg/g of glucan for newspaper and cardboard. For each data point, three replicates were collected. The average ± S.D. values are shown for each measurement

Importantly, for industrial applications, cellulases must be able to hydrolyze cellulose in lignocellulosic materials, such as agricultural, industrial, or the organic fraction of city waste, in which cellulose in crystalline and amorphous forms together with lignin and hemicellulose is present. The digestion occurs in synergy with other enzymes, such as laccase and hemicellulases that given the recalcitrant nature of the biomass, helps by breaking down lignin and hemicellulose, making cellulase accessible for hydrolysis. This is important, for instance, for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass, using enzymes for biofuel production. To test this aspect, we use cardboard, newspaper, and softwood from pine tree as a source of cellulose. These three materials have different contents of cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose. While cardboard contains around 60% cellulose and around 15% of lignin and hemicellulose, newspaper and pine softwood contain less cellulose, 50% or less29,30, and more lignin, ~22% and ~30%, respectively, and ~18% and ~25% of hemicellulose, respectively. We perform activity assays using isolated LFCA_EG and in combination with an evolved laccase mutant from Myceliophthora thermophila31 and xylanase from Trichoderma viride (endo-1,4-β-xylanase M1), enzymes that can help to break down lignin and hemicellulose, respectively. We determine the percentage of cellulose hydrolyzed in a 50 mg sample of lignocellulosic material29,30, within 1 h at 50 °C and pH 4.8. In the case of cardboard, the three EG enzymes degrade very small amounts of cellulose on their own, no more than ~19% (Fig. 3b), suggesting that cellulose is not easily accessible. LFCA_EG worked best when used synergistically with laccase and xylanase, hydrolyzing close to 40% of the cellulose present in the sample, as compared with Bs_EG, which degraded ~27% and Tm_EG, which degraded ~14%. In the case of newspaper and softwood, similar efficiency of cellulose degradation than cardboard is obtained, although still LFCA_EG shows higher conversion (Fig. 3c, d). These results highlight not only the potential of LFCA_EG to work with lignocellulosic substrates, but also the advantage of using multienzyme cocktails containing cellulases, laccases, xylanases, and other enzymes for efficient enzymatic pretreatment of raw materials and subsequent hydrolysis of cellulose. Similar measurements are carried out comparing LFCA_EG with Tr_EG, in which LFCA_EG also demonstrates better performance (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Introduction of the LFCA_EG in a cellulosome

Another attempt to increase the activity of LFCA_EG is to incorporate it into scaffoldin, a non-catalytic scaffolding protein from a cellulosome, which is a macromolecular complex containing several lignocellulose-degrading enzymes anchored via dockerin protein domains. Anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria such as C. thermocellum utilize the cellulosome to degrade cellulose very efficiently, and its use has been suggested for industrial applications, due to the increased cellulolytic activity observed when compared with the free enzymes32. We make different constructs fusing EG enzymes to dockerin domains present in this cellulosome to convert LFCA_EG into the cellulosomal mode. We fuse dockerin at the C terminus of the ancestral EG (LFCA-Dock) to allow its incorporation into a mini-scaffoldin containing a single (Scaf1) or two tandem (Scaf2) cohesin modules (Fig. 4a). As controls, we use LFCA EG (LFCA-Dock) fused to a cellulose-binding module (LFCA-CBM) and C. thermocellum Cel8A EG (CtCel8A), a major EG in its cellulosome33. LFCA-Dock incorporation into two mini-scaffoldins occurs at molar ratios of 1.1:1 (LFCA-Dock:Scaf1) and 2:1 (LFCA-Dock:Scaf2), which is close to the expected ratio since cohesin–dockerin-binding occurs in a 1:1 ratio32, indicating precise complex formation (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, LFCA-Dock incorporated into the cellulosome and LFCA_EG-CBM is capable of binding microcrystalline cellulose Avicel (Supplementary Fig. 6), while the other proteins fail. This indicates that, as expected, only when a CBM is present, specific microcrystalline cellulose binding can occur.

Fig. 4
figure4

Cellulosome assembly and activity assays. a Schematic representation of the incorporation of ancestral endoglucanase (LFCA_EG) into a mini-cellulosome. The different molecular elements assembled are represented and indicated by the symbols in the legend. b Native-PAGE shows that a new band appears upon incubation of LFCA_EG-Dockerin and a mini-scaffoldin, indicating complex formation. Activity of the free and mini-cellulosome-bound LFCA_EG on c Avicel, d PASC, and e CMC substrates compared with Cel8A_EG from C. thermocellum. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate and the average ± S.D. values are shown

To study the effect of the incorporation of LFCA_EG into the cellulosome, we first perform activity assays with Avicel, which is targeted by the CBM used (Fig. 4c). According to the thermal stability measurements, we perform these assays at 70 °C, a temperature at which no major loss of activity is expected to occur during the long incubation time needed. Free LFCA_EG shows higher activity with this substrate than native CtCel8A (4.3 ± 0.2 vs. 2.9 ± 0.13 mmol sugars mmol−1 enzyme min−1, respectively). Dockerin incorporation into LFCA_EG results in a lower activity (3.41 ± 0.03 mmol sugars mmol−1 enzyme min−1) than that of the original LFCA_EG, which is still slightly higher than that of CtCel8A (Fig. 4c). Importantly, when LFCA_EG-Dock is incorporated into Scaf1, the resulting activity is remarkably enhanced, 6.2 ± 0.7 mmol sugars mmol−1 enzyme min−1, with a high degree of synergy of 1.8 ± 0.2 (defined as the ratio of the activity of the bound enzyme over that of the free one). In the case of CtCel8A, the activity measured is 4.2 ± 0.7 mmol sugars mmol−1 enzyme min−1 in the presence of Scaf1 and a degree of synergy of 1.4 ± 0.3 was found.

The complex LFCA_EG-CBM shows a similar activity than that of LFCA-Dock, 7.0 ± 0.3 mmol sugars mmol−1 enzyme min−1, supporting the idea that this enhancement is due to a substrate-targeting effect. Incorporation into Scaf2, whereby two tandem identical cohesins allow for the formation of a cellulosome with two enzymes, does not provide further activity enhancement in either case, 4.4 ± 1.8 for LFCA_EG and 4.3 ± 0.6 mmol sugars mmol−1 enzyme min−1 for CtCel8A. Nevertheless, this result does not preclude the possibility of further synergy, if different enzymes are used in the future, together with LFCA_EG. Similar results are observed at all of the tested pH values (Supplementary Fig. 7) and at lower temperatures (Supplementary Fig. 8). However, at temperatures above 80 °C, the situation is reversed and CtCel8A shows higher activities (Supplementary Fig. 8), perhaps due to the long reaction times.

The activity of the different proteins and complexes is then tested for different substrates to investigate the origin of the enhanced activity upon cellulosomal incorporation. First, we use PASC (Fig. 4d), an amorphous cellulose substrate. The results obtained are similar to those presented for Avicel, where LFCA_EG shows higher activity than CtCel8A when studied free in solution. Incorporation of both enzymes into Scaf1 resulted in an increased activity, which is higher for LFCA-containing mini-cellulosomes than in CtCel8A ones. However, when tested on CMC, to which the CBM used in this study does not bind, neither the fusion with dockerin or the CBM fusion, nor the integration into a mini-cellulosome, significantly alters the activity of LFCA_EG or CtCel8A (Fig. 4e). Since the CBM used in this study is expected to bind PASC but not CMC, the results obtained also support the idea that scaffoldin CBM is capable of further enhancing the activity of LFCA_EG on certain substrates. Importantly, the activity of LFCA_EG is found to be greater than that of CtCel8A in all substrates, although these results seem to depend on the particular conditions of the assay, especially above 70 °C (Supplementary Fig. 8). Taken together, these results indicate that the incorporation of LFCA_EG into a mini-cellulosome enhances its activity, especially for substrates that are difficult to degrade, which are the most interesting ones for biotechnological applications.

Comparison of the crystal structures of the EG

The experiments described above show that the ancestral EG is more active than the modern enzymes in almost any condition. To shed light into the structural basis of this high efficiency, we solve the crystal structure of LFCA_EG to 1.45 Å resolution (PDB ID: 6GJF) from data collected at a synchrotron source. The crystal belongs to the P21 space group (Supplementary Table 2) with six polypeptide chains in the asymmetric unit and a water content of 45.5%. All chains present the conserved EG canonical fold typical for enzymes from the GH5 family, composed of an internal β-barrel surrounded by an array of α-helices, (β/α)8-barrel (Fig. 5a, b). The maximum root mean square deviation (RMSD) is of 0.34 and 0.28 Å between chains A and C for the Cα and all atoms, respectively.

Fig. 5
figure5

Crystal structure of ancestral LFCA_EG and comparison with extant EG forms from B. subtilis and T. maritima. a Ribbon representation of LFCA_EG showing secondary structural elements and b rotated 90°. c Structural overlay of LFCA_EG (dark gray) with Bs_EG (PDB: 3PZT, blue) and d overlay with Tm_EG (PDB: 3MMU, red). A zoom perspective of the active site highlighting the conserved residues E136, E224, W210, and W258 is shown in e for LFCA_EG and Bs_EG and f for LFCA_EG and Tm_EG. The residues refer to positions in LFCA_EG that overlap with the corresponding residues in Bs_EG (E169, E257) and Tm_EG (E136, E253)

To investigate any substantial structural change, we compare the structure of LFCA_EG with that of Bs_EG (PDB ID: 3PZT), sharing 73% of their sequence, also used as a query model for the molecular replacement phasing procedure. From the superposition of both structures (Fig. 5c), we see that all major structural elements are equivalent with an all-atom RMSD of 0.5 Å. We do not observe any major difference other than a small displacement, lower than 2.5 Å, in several loops. A structural alignment of the two enzymes also reveals the location of the conserved and mutated residues (Supplementary Fig. 9). Mutations mainly occur in α-helices and loops.

We also compare the structure of LFCA_EG with that of Tm_EG (PDB ID: 3MMU). The all-atom RMSD is of 2.6 Å, in the best of the cases, which is not surprising since sequence identity between Tm_EG and our ancestral enzyme is only ~20%. Although all three structural models have similar fold, relevant differences are observed between the ancestral and Tm_EG structures with significant movement of some secondary elements (Fig. 5d). The internal β-barrel is quite conserved, whereas the outer α-helices show structural changes. There is also relevant displacement in several loops accumulating the higher sequence discrepancy between both enzymes, with important deletions in the ancestral reconstructed one. Nevertheless, the residues E136 and E224 of LFCA_EG, essential for the catalytic reaction, are in a similar position than those in Bs_EG and Tm_EG. Also, W174 and W258, that serve for substrate recognition and stacking, are conserved and equivalent to those of Bs_EG and Tm_EG (Fig. 5e, f). Whether the small structural differences observed can explain the difference in activity is hard to tell.

Computer simulations for the EG

Computer simulations with atomistic detail can shed light on the origin of the outstanding activity of the ancestral enzyme, particularly for understanding enzyme–substrate interactions. Crystallizing a cellulase enzyme bind to its glucosidic substrate, without mutating the active site to freeze the substrate, is virtually impossible due to the hydrolyzing activity of the enzyme. Hence, MD simulations are a good alternative to study the positioning and dynamics of the substrate in the active site prior to the hydrolysis reaction. We use the experimental structures for the cellulases from Tm_EG, Bs_EG, and LFCA_EG in the presence of a tetrasaccharide (Fig. 6a). Since the experimental structures lack the ligand, we insert it by fitting each experimental structure onto that of a cellotetraose-bound mutant of Cel5 from Thermotoga maritima (PDB ID: 3AZT) and carefully replacing the substrate for a cellotetraose (see further details in the “Methods” section). Two independent equilibrium MD simulations are prepared for each complex, with the total simulation data for each enzyme adding up to 1 ms (the results of one set of simulations are reported in Fig. 6b, while those for the other set are shown in Supplementary Fig. 10). This simulation timescale allows for probing the dynamics of the ligand within the active site cavity.

Fig. 6
figure6

Computational analysis of enzyme–substrate interaction. a Structure of Tm_EG, Bs_EG, and LFCA_EG with cellotetraose substrate computationally fitted into the active site. b Time-series simulations of the active site nucleophile residue distance (dnuc) to a glycosidic bond in a substrate and acid–base catalytic donor distance (dAB). We run two MD simulations summing a total of 1 ms with similar qualitative results. c Structure and interaction of cellotetraose substrate bound to catalytically relevant residues in the active site of Tm_EG (red) and LFCA_EG (gray)

Although we cannot recover exhaustive sampling with only two runs, our results show important qualitative differences in terms of protein–substrate interactions for the three enzymes. On the one end, we find that the Tm_EG keeps the substrate closest to the catalysis-competent position, where the nucleophile (E253) and proton donor (E136) are closest to the glycosidic oxygen, dnuc and dAB in Fig. 6b plots, respectively (see also Supplementary Fig. 10). This is facilitated by a long loop that forms a clamp for the substrate (via a tryptophane residue, W210), which is possibly required for efficient binding at the high temperatures where this thermophile grows. In the two simulation runs of the Bs_EG enzyme with the sugar, we find that the substrate escapes from the binding site, as monitored by the distances of the glycosidic oxygen to the donor and nucleophile glutamic residues (E169 and E257) (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 10), suggesting a lower affinity in good accordance with experiment. In what appears an intermediate situation between Tm_EG and Bs_EG, the ancestral enzyme LFCA_EG is able to retain the substrate close to the position compatible with catalysis during the full duration of our simulations, albeit with stronger fluctuations than in the case of Tm_EG.

The picture that we recover from the MD simulations is that of a greater retention of the substrate for the Tm_EG enzyme and lower affinity for Bs_EG, with the ancestral enzyme (LFCA_EG) being somewhere in-between. The greater retention of the substrate in Tm_EG is consistent with its higher degree of active site burial. We show a representation of the active site cavities for each protein, derived from the CASTp3.0 server34, in Supplementary Fig. 11. Clearly, the Tm_EG has a greater surface area than that of Bs_EG and LFCA_EG, due to the longer loop encompassing tryptophan W210. This loop may be involved in large-amplitude motions that modulate the access of the substrate and release of the product. Unfortunately, the MD simulations we perform are too short relative to the timescales in which these movements may occur. For this reason, we derive an elastic network model (ENM), which can efficiently predict conformational fluctuations related to ligand binding35 (see Supplementary Information). The slow modes from the ENM for Tm_EG predict opening and closing motions that are highly localized in the loop region (Supplementary Fig. 12). These slow dynamics may hinder ligand binding compared with the very easy access of the substrate to the active site in Bs_EG and LFCA_EG. We speculate that, for LFCA_EG, the greater ability to retain the substrate relative to Bs_EG together with the easy access to the active site in the opened cavity may contribute to the increased activity observed in the experiments, providing a “best of both worlds” situation relative to its extant counterparts. In addition, these results provide a clue for the structural origin of substrate promiscuity.

Discussion

Numerous ancestral proteins and enzymes have been reconstructed in the past few years, but most of them mainly aim to prove evolutionary hypotheses. Although the possibility of using ancestral enzymes in biotechnology has been pointed out before14,15,24, such a goal still remained unexplored. Here, we use ASR to improve an example of an enzyme relevant in biotechnology, and we focus on most of the aspects that are of interest in a possible industrial setting, i.e., thermostability, pH tolerance, broad substrate usage, chemical promiscuity, and synergy with other enzymes.

In this work, we show that an ancient reconstructed endo-β-glucanase displays high activity over a broad range of temperatures, pH values, and substrates, both as a free enzyme, and in combination with other lignocellulosic enzymes, as well as part of a cellulosome complex. This enzyme also shows processive endoglucanase activity, which is remarkable given that its modern counterparts from family GH5 do not display exoglucanase activity. Overall, the ancestral enzyme displays chemical properties that make it an interesting catalyst for possible biotechnological and protein engineering applications. From the crystal structure, we can infer that the ancestral EG maintains the same fold as modern cellulases. Simulating a complete enzymatic reaction would require complex quantum mechanical calculations that are beyond the scope of this work. However, using the crystal structure, it is possible to run classical MD that can shed light into the structural rearrangement between the enzyme and the substrate prior to the reaction itself. These simulations show that the ancestral enzyme seems to share features with the other two enzymes studied, on the one hand accommodating the substrate for the whole duration of the simulations (like in the simulations of Tm_EG), and on the other hand, allowing for greater dynamics in the more opened active site (as is the case of Bs_EG). We speculate that the greater dynamics and the opened cavity in the active site may contribute to the promiscuity of substrates that is a characteristic feature of ancestral enzymes.

A relevant aspect of this new ancestral enzyme is its elevated activity even at high temperature. Typically, ancestral enzymes are not necessarily more stable than those from modern extremophiles11. Enzymes present in the Hadean and Archean eons, when the temperature of the oceans was estimated to be 60–70 °C10, were thermophiles11,25,36. This thermophilic phenotype is captured by ASR and exhibited by our ancestral EG. However, our LFCA_EG goes beyond the thermophilic range, working at 30–90 °C. This range covers a good portion of temperatures from mesothermophiles to hyperthermophiles. However, ancestral enzymes display other properties, such as broad pH usability, higher expression yields, or substrate and catalytic promiscuity11,14, which makes them stand up vs. extant enzymes, including extremophiles. These features make ancestral enzymes an interesting alternative for industry. In general, ancestral enzymes are considered to be generalists having a broader range of applicability than contemporary enzymes, which are considered specialists37, including extremophiles, for which the evolution to substrate and organismal specificity may limit their efficiency outside their natural environment. Thus, ASR emerges as a potential methodology for protein engineering with multiple applications in biotechnology38,39, beyond its possible evolutionary implications. Also, it is remarkable that our resurrected EG enzyme works well at 30 °C. This temperature is interesting for future applications in processes, such as consolidated bioprocessing of biomass, which is carried out to obtain bioethanol in a single step combining saccharification and fermentation40.

A single EG enzyme is needed to achieve high activity under different conditions and substrates, which is difficult for any other protein engineering technique currently available. Certainly, our result could be a valuable departure point for further EG engineering through directed evolution, which typically starts from modern enzymes of limited evolvability, given that they have been already specialized by natural selection toward a given function. Indeed, the first successful example of laboratory evolution of a Precambrian enzyme has been reported, opening an unexplored path for more challenging objectives41. Among them, improving the thermal stability of an enzyme while maintaining its catalytic activity unchanged is a milestone for protein engineers, given the complex interrelation between structure and function in proteins42. Furthermore, while our ancestral EG is both thermoactive and thermostable, it also shows a noticeable catalytic efficiency. Finally, the ancestral EG also shows very good synergy with other lignocellulosic enzymes, such as laccase and xylanase, and its activity can be further enhanced by incorporation into the cellulosomal mode. We anticipate that other lignocellulosic enzymes, including fungal cellulases and ligninases, could benefit from ancestral reconstruction, which could also help to generate very efficient cocktails for the saccharification step of cellulosic substrates. This would provide a long-awaited improvement that could be used in numerous industrial applications.

Methods

Phylogenetic analysis and ancestral sequence reconstruction

We downloaded 32 endoglucanase sequences from different species divided in three bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes) from UniProt database. All sequences belong to the family Cel5A and are classified as 1,4-(1,3:1,4)-β-d-glucan-4-glucano-hydrolases (EC 3.2.1.4). All sequence ID numbers are listed in the Supplementary Information. The sequences were aligned using MUSCLE43 software and further edited manually. The alignment was tested for best model of protein evolution using ProTest44, resulting in the Jones–Taylor–Thornton (JTT), with gamma distribution model as the best evolution model. The phylogeny was performed using Bayesian inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We used BEAST v1.8.4 package software18 incorporating the BEAGLE library for parallel processing. We set monophyletic groups for Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes. We set the JTT model with eight gamma categories and invariant distribution, Yule model for speciation, and length chain of 25 million generations, sampling every 1000 generations. We estimated divergence times using the uncorrelated log-normal clock model (UCLN), using molecular information from the TTOL19. Birth and death rates were set to default. Calculations were run for 2 days in a 12-core iMac computer. We discarded the initial 25% of trees as burn-in using the LogCombiner utility from BEAST. The MCMC log file was verified using Tracer, with all parameters showing effective sample size (ESS)>100. Tree Annotator was used to estimate maximum clade credibility. All nodes were supported by posterior probabilities above 0.69, with most of them nearly 1. FigTree v1.4.2 was used for tree representation and editing. Ancestral sequence reconstruction was performed by maximum likelihood using PAML 4.845, incorporating a gamma distribution for variable replacement rates across sites and the JTT model. Posterior probabilities were calculated for all 20 amino acids. In each site, the residue with the highest posterior probability was selected. Three internal nodes LFCA, LCCA, and LACA were selected for laboratory resurrection.

Protein expression and purification

Ancestral LFCA_EG, LCCA_EG, LACA_EG, extant Tm_EG (ID: Q9X273), and Bs_EG (ID: P23549) proteins encoding genes were synthesized and codon-optimized for expression in E. coli cells. They were cloned into pQE80L vector (Qiagen) and transformed onto E. coli BL21 (DE3) (Life Technologies). Cells were incubated in LB medium at 37 °C, and after reaching OD600 of 0.6, IPTG was added to a final solution of 1 mM to induce protein expression overnight. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 rpm. Cell pellets were resuspended in extraction buffer containing 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7, 300 mM NaCl, and lysed using a French press. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 40,000 rpm for 40 min. For purification, His6-tagged proteins were loaded onto His GraviTrap affinity column (GE Healthcare) and eluted in 50 mM sodium-phosphate buffer, pH 7, 300 mM NaCl, and 150 mM imidazole. Finally, proteins were further purified by size-exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200HR column (GE Healthcare) and eluted in 50 mM citrate buffer at pH 4.8. For the verification of purified proteins, sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) was used on 12% gels. The protein concentration was estimated by measuring absorbance at 280 nm using a Nanodrop 2000C. Tr_EG is a commercial preparation and two different batches were used for the experiments: one as lyophilized powder (Sigma reference C8546 from T. reesei ATCC 26921) and a second one as enzyme solution from Sigma-Aldrich (C2730), both sold as 1,4-(1,3:1,4)-β-d-glucan-4-glucano-hydrolase (EC 3.2.1.4). The determination of the protein concentration in the solution (C2730) was first made by the dry-weight method46 for protein content determination. Size-exclusion chromatography was used with a Superdex 200HR column and eluted in water. Then the sample was frozen, dried, and weighted. Protein concentration was also determined by the BCA assay (PierceTM, Thermo Fisher 23227) using a BSA standard supplied with the kit and also our ancestral LFCA_EG. A total protein concentration of about 125 mg mL−1 was determined with both methodologies. Using Tr_ EG in the powder or solution form provided nearly identical results at the same concentration. An evolved laccase (KyLO mutant) from M. thermophila was heterologously produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as reported elsewhere31.

Enzymatic activity assays

Cellulolytic activity of ancestral EG was tested in 50 mM citrate buffer, pH 4.8, containing 2% CMC (Sigma-Aldrich reference 21902) for 30 min at various incubation temperatures and a final volume of 500 µL. Cellulases from Tm_EG and Tr_EG (from Sigma-Aldrich, reference C8546 for lyophilized powder and C2730 for enzyme solution) were used as controls. Enzyme dosage 5 mg per gram of glucan. Enzymatic reactions were terminated by placing the tubes into an ice-water bath. Enzymatic activity was determined quantitatively by measuring soluble reducing sugars released from the cellulosic substrate by the DNS method21. All assays were performed in 5% glycerol that is used as a stabilizer. A volume of 1.5 mL of the DNS solution was added to each sample, and after boiling the reaction mixture for 5 min, absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a NanoDrop 2000C. A glucose standard curve was used to determine the concentration of the released reducing sugars. All assays were performed in triplicate and the average value with standard deviation was determined. On determination of the pH dependence, purified enzymes were diluted in 50 mM citrate buffer at different pH values between 4 and 10; citrate buffer for pH 4 and 5, phosphate buffer for pH 6, 7, and 8, and carbonate buffer for pH 9 and 10. Activities were measured with 2% CMC at 70 °C for 30 min. The amount of reducing sugars was measured and quantified by the DNS and BCA methods. Avicel (Sigma-Aldrich Ref S3504) was used for the determination of the enzymatic activity in crystalline substrates. A volume of 0.4 mL of enzyme solution was placed together with 1.6 mL of 1.25% Avicel solution. Enzyme dosage 15 mg/g of glucan. Substrate and enzymes blanks were also prepared. Enzymatic reactions were stopped by placing the tubes into an ice-water bath, and the tubes were then centrifuged for 2 min at 14,000 rpm at room temperature. Enzymatic activity was determined quantitatively by measuring soluble reducing sugars released from the cellulosic substrate by the DNS. A volume of 1.50 mL of the DNS solution was added to 1 mL of sample (supernatant fluids), and after boiling the reaction mixture for 5 min, absorbance at 540 nm was measured.

Kinetic parameters determination

To determine the kinetics parameters of the cellulases, KM and Vmax, numerous substrate concentrations were used in the range of 1–20 mg mL−1 of CMC for measurement of endoglucanase activity. The KM and Vmax were determined directly from the linearized fitting of the Michaelis–Menten model, generated using Phyton in-house written script. kcat was determined from the relation Vmax/Et, where Et is the total enzyme concentration in μmol mL−147. The parameters are reported in the main text and Table 1.

Processivity assay

In order to determine the processivity26 of the cellulases, there was a ratio of soluble to insoluble reducing sugar from PASC. The reaction was carried out at 45 °C with 0.5% of PASC, and a sample was removed from the mixture at different time points. After centrifugation, the quantity of the released reducing sugars in the supernatant and in the remaining PASC fraction was determined by the DNS method.

Lignocellulosic substrates hydrolysis

We used 50 mg of milled lignocellulosic material (cardboard, newspaper, and pine softwood) in 50 mM citrate buffer at pH 4.8. Enzyme hydrolysis was performed for 1 h at 50 °C. Endoglucanase alone or in combination with laccase and xylanase was used for hydrolysis of the lignocellulosic material. Three different enzyme combinations were used differing in the endoglucanase used: LFCA_EG, Tm_EG, Bs_EG, and Tr_EG. EG enzyme dosage was 14 mg/g of cellulose in the case of cardboard and 15 mg/g of cellulose in the case of newspaper and softwood, 50 µL of a solution of ~4 U mL−1 of laccase, and 5 µL of a solution of ~1700 U mL−1 of xylanase (endo-1,4-β-xylanase M1 from Trichoderma viride, Megazyme) in a total volume of 500 µL. Released sugars are quantified with the DNS method. Cellulose hydrolysis yield was determined as described elsewhere48,49.

Cellulosome constructs

Two mini-scaffoldins were designed in this study consisting of components from C. thermocellum CipA scaffoldin. In particular, the X-module and type II dockerin dyad and the CBM were amplified from pET28-XDock and pET28-CBM, respectively. Cohesin 7 was amplified from pAFM-c7A50. First, XDock was amplified with primers incorporating NdeI, NheI, KpnI, and SpeI sites at the 5′ end and two STOP codons and a XhoI site at the 3′ end. The resulting fragment was cloned into a pET28 vector using NdeI and XhoI sites. Then the CBM was amplified and cloned into the previous vector using NdeI and NheI sites. Next, cohesin 7 sequence was cloned using KpnI and SpeI sites to generate pET28-Scaf1. A second copy of cohesin 7 was then cloned into this vector in the SpeI site to generate pETScaf2, containing two tandem cohesins. Both mini-scaffoldins carried a His6 tag at the N terminus.

Integration of the LFCA_EG into the mini-cellulosome was accomplished by cloning the LFCA_EG sequence into a pET28a vector between the NcoI and EcoRI sites. Then, the sequence of C. thermocellum Cel8A dockerin (and N-terminal linker) was PCR amplified and cloned at the C terminus of the LFCA_EG sequence between EcoRI and XhoI sites, thus generating pET28-LFCA_EG-Dockerin that carries a C-terminal hexa-histidine tag. LFCA_EG-CBM was generated by replacing the Cel8A dockerin with a sequence containing the linker between Cel8A catalytic domain and dockerin, followed by the CipA CBM. Both mini-scaffoldins and LFCA_EG fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21 star (DE3). Expression of mini-scaffoldins was carried out at 16 °C with 0.1 mM IPTG overnight, while LFCA_EG fusions and Cel8A were expressed at 37 °C for 3 h in 1 mM IPTG. Cultures were lysed by enzymatic digestion in 1 mg mL−1 lysozyme, 1% Triton X-100, 5 µg mL−1 DNAseI, and 5 µg mL−1 RNAse A and centrifuged to remove cell debris. Clarified samples were incubated at 55 °C for 20 min, cooled in ice, and centrifuged to eliminate aggregated proteins. Affinity purification was then carried out using HisTrap columns in an ÅKTA Purifier FPLC (GE Healthcare). Sample purity was evaluated by SDS–PAGE and proteins were concentrated in Tris 50 mM, NaCl 300 mM, and CaCl2 1 mM, pH 7, quantified by absorbance at 280 nm with a NanoDrop (ThermoScientific) and stored in 50% glycerol. Mini-cellulosome assembly assays were performed by native PAGE. Different relations of proteins were incubated in 50 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, and 1 mM CaCl2, pH 7 at 37 °C for 1 h before running the gel. SdbA cohesin was also added to block XDock in the scaffoldin. The true enzyme–scaffoldin ratio was determined from this analysis and according to that ratio, no free protein was found in excess. This ratio was used in the following experiments.

Microcrystalline cellulose binding was assayed as described previously32. Briefly, 10 µg of protein was incubated with 10 mg of Avicel (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4 °C for 1 h with gentle agitation. Samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was stored as the unbound fraction. The pellet was washed three times and used as the bound fraction. Both samples were then analyzed by SDS–PAGE and BSA was used as a control.

Cellulosome activity assays

Proteins were incubated in acetate buffer, pH 5.5 containing 100 mM NaCl, 12 mM CaCl2, and 2 mM EDTA for 1 h at 37 °C to allow complex formation. Enzymes were used at 0.5 µM for Avicel and PASC analyses, and at 0.35 µM for CMC assays. Scaffoldins were added at equimolar concentration according to native-PAGE analysis. BSA was added in all samples to minimize unspecific enzyme–substrate interactions. Avicel assays were conducted for 24 h in an orbital shaker in 2-mL tubes containing a wing magnet to improve stirring, so that this insoluble substrate did not precipitate. PASC was prepared as described elsewhere51. Assays with this substrate were conducted in similar tubes but in a heating block for 30 min. After incubation time, samples were centrifuged and the soluble sugars present in solution in the supernatant were determined by the DNS assay. Absorbance was measured in a 96-well plate using a FLUOstar fluorimeter (BMG Labtech, Germany) in the absorbance mode. CMC assays were conducted in a heating block using azo-CMC (Megazyme) as a substrate. The activity was determined according to the manufacturer’s indications.

Crystallization data collection and structure determination

Protein, at an initial concentration of 8.0 mg mL−1 in 50 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 4.8, was incubated with CMC at double concentration for 30 min. The excess of ligand was removed by washing with the same buffer with centrifugation, using 0.5 ml concentration units (Amicon). The final protein concentration was 17.0 mg mL−1, as determined spectrophotometrically. An initial crystallization screening was done using the vapor-diffusion technique in its hanging-drop configuration. Crystallization experiments were set up in 24-well crystallization plates VDX (Hampton Research), using the 100-conditions kit from the Hampton Research Screen I&II. Hanging droplets were prepared by mixing protein solution (1 µL) with reservoir solution (1 µL) on a 22 mm siliconized round coverslip inverted over a 500 µL reservoir. Crystals were obtained in conditions C22 (0.2 M sodium acetate trihydrate, 0.1 M Tris hydrochloride, pH 8.5, and 30% w/v PEG 4 K) and C32 (0.1 M MES monohydrate, pH 6.5, 12% w/v PEG 20 K) of rod and hexagonal plate shapes, respectively. For data collection, crystals were cryoprotected in the mother liquid containing 15% (v/v) glycerol, cryocooled in liquid nitrogen, and stored until data collection. Crystals were tested at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (beam line ID30B). Data were indexed and integrated with XDS52, and scaled and reduced with AIMLESS53 of the CCP4 program suite54. The structure was determined by molecular replacement, using the coordinates of the endoglucanase from B. subtilis (PDB:3PZV) as the search model as suggested from Phyre255. The molecular replacement solution was found using Phaser56 locating the six monomers in the asymmetric unit. Several cycles of manual building steps, Coot57, and structure refinement, phenix.refine58, were done followed by continuous model check with MolProbity59, as implemented within the Phenix suite58. Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank repository with accession code 6GJF. Figures were prepared with Pymol (Schrodinger, LLC, 2010). Details of data collection and processing, refinement statistics, and quality indicators of the final model are summarized in Supplementary Table 2.

Computational structural characterization

We have run atomistic MD of Bs_EG, Tm_EG, and LFCA_EG, in the presence of a cellulosic substrate starting from the experimental structures (PDB IDs: 3AMC, 3PTZ, and 6GJF, respectively). None of these structures were resolved in the presence of an oligosaccharide, and for this reason, we had to introduce it manually using the following procedure. First, we fitted the structure of a tetrasaccharide formed by four units of d-glucose linked by β (1 → 4)-glycosidic bonds on the corresponding atoms of the cellotetraose-bound Tm_EG E253A mutant (pdb 3PZT), so that the four glucose monomers corresponded to subsites −3, −2, −1, and +1, resulting in a conformation that is compatible with catalysis. Having the tetrasaccharide well positioned, then we used the MultiSeq plugin60 available in the VMD software to fit each of the three enzyme structures of interest on that of the Tm_EG mutant based on their structural alignment. The coordinates of sugar and enzyme were then combined, solvated, and energy minimized. Simulations were run using an identical protocol for all three enzymes, involving a short NVT run with position restraints on the enzyme and the sugar, followed by removal of restrains on the enzyme, a 20 ps NPT run to equilibrate the box volume and a production run at 300 K in the NVT ensemble, using a stochastic dynamics integrator with 2 fs time steps. The particle mesh Ewald method61 was used for the electrostatics and the distances for all the hydrogen-heavy atom bonds were constrained using LINCS. All the simulations were run using the Gromacs 2018 software package62. We used the optimized Amber03* force field63 for the protein with the TIP3P water model64. The doglycans tool65 was used to generate parameters for the oligosaccharide, so that they can be read by the Gromacs software package. We chose the GLYCAM parameter set that is compatible with the Amber force field family66. Specifically, we used the prepreader.py script to prepare the parameters for the carbohydrate chain.

Elastic network models

To gain further insight on the slow conformational dynamics of the proteins of interest, we resort to ENMs. ENMs are based on the assumption that the dynamic properties of proteins are dictated by the topology of native contacts67. This type of model, combined with normal mode analysis, has been very useful for a variety of applications related to the study of protein dynamics, including the identification of functional conformational changes in enzymes and the comparison of ensembles of experimental structures35,67. Here, we limit our study to the simplest and most broadly used type of ENM, the anisotropic network model (ANM).

We have used the Python package ProDy68 (http://prody.csb.pitt.edu/) to generate ANMs of Tm_EG, Bs_EG, and LFCA_AG, using the same PDB files as for the MD simulations. The ANM is built using the Cα trace of the protein, whose atoms are connected by harmonic springs, resulting in an energy function

$$E_{{\mathrm{Network}}} = \frac{1}{2}\mathop {\sum }\limits_{ij} \gamma \left( {r_{ij} - r_{ij}^0} \right)^2$$
(1)

where the sum runs over pairs ij of residues under a cutoff distance (rcut), the terms rij and rij0 correspond to the distances between pairs of Cα atoms in instantaneous and reference configurations, respectively, and γi are the force constants67. Here, we use the default parameters in ProDy for both cutoff distances (rc = 15 Å) and force constants (γ = 1). The analysis of the Hessian of the potential returns the normal modes of the system. The lowest frequency normal modes are of greatest interest because they contain information about the large-amplitude motions in the biomolecule.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank repository with accession code 6GJF.

References

  1. 1.

    Bayer, E. A., Chanzy, H., Lamed, R. & Shoham, Y. Cellulose, cellulases and cellulosomes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 548–557 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Farrell, A. E. et al. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311, 506–508 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Limayem, A. & Ricke, S. C. Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 38, 449–467 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kumar, P., Barrett, D. M., Delwiche, M. J. & Stroeve, P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 3713–3729 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Anbar, M., Gul, O., Lamed, R., Sezerman, U. O. & Bayer, E. A. Improved thermostability of Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase Cel8A by using consensus-guided mutagenesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 3458–3464 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chang, C. J. et al. Exploring the mechanism responsible for cellulase thermostability by structure-guided recombination. PLoS ONE 11, e0147485 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Graham, J. E. et al. Identification and characterization of a multidomain hyperthermophilic cellulase from an archaeal enrichment. Nat. Commun. 2, 375 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Maki, M., Leung, K. T. & Qin, W. The prospects of cellulase-producing bacteria for the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Int J. Biol. Sci. 5, 500–516 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Molina-Espeja, P. et al. Beyond the outer limits of nature by directed evolution. Biotechnol. Adv. 34, 754–767 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gaucher, E. A., Govindarajan, S. & Ganesh, O. K. Palaeotemperature trend for Precambrian life inferred from resurrected proteins. Nature 451, 704–707 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Perez-Jimenez, R. et al. Single-molecule paleoenzymology probes the chemistry of resurrected enzymes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 592–596 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Manteca, A. et al. Mechanochemical evolution of the giant muscle protein titin as inferred from resurrected proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 652–657 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Merkl, R. & Sterner, R. Ancestral protein reconstruction: techniques and applications. Biol. Chem. 397, 1–21 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Risso, V. A., Gavira, J. A., Mejia-Carmona, D. F., Gaucher, E. A. & Sanchez-Ruiz, J. M. Hyperstability and substrate promiscuity in laboratory resurrections of Precambrian beta-lactamases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 2899–2902 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Alcalde, M. When directed evolution met ancestral enzyme resurrection. Microb. Biotechnol. 10, 22–24 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bayer, E. A., Shimon, L. J., Shoham, Y. & Lamed, R. Cellulosomes-structure and ultrastructure. J. Struct. Biol. 124, 221–234 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nordon, R. E., Craig, S. J. & Foong, F. C. Molecular engineering of the cellulosome complex for affinity and bioenergy applications. Biotechnol. Lett. 31, 465–476 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. & Rambaut, A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1969–1973 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hedges, S. B., Marin, J., Suleski, M., Paymer, M. & Kumar, S. Tree of life reveals clock-like speciation and diversification. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 835–845 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nobles, D. R., Romanovicz, D. K. & Brown, R. M. Cellulose in cyanobacteria. origin of vascular plant cellulose synthase? Plant Physiol. 127, 529–542 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    GL, M. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 31, 426–428 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Galbe, M. & Zacchi, G. Pretreatment: the key to efficient utilization of lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenergy 46, 70–78 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Robert, F. & Chaussidon, M. A palaeotemperature curve for the Precambrian oceans based on silicon isotopes in cherts. Nature 443, 969–972 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Risso, V. A., Gavira, J. A. & Sanchez-Ruiz, J. M. Thermostable and promiscuous Precambrian proteins. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 1485–1489 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Garcia, A. K., Schopf, J. W., Yokobori, S. I., Akanuma, S. & Yamagishi, A. Reconstructed ancestral enzymes suggest long-term cooling of Earth’s photic zone since the Archean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4619–4624 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wu, B. et al. Processivity and enzymatic mechanism of a multifunctional family 5 endoglucanase from Bacillus subtilis BS-5 with potential applications in the saccharification of cellulosic substrates. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11, 20 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zheng, F. & Ding, S. Processivity and enzymatic mode of a glycoside hydrolase family 5 endoglucanase from Volvariella volvacea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 989–996 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ling, Z., Chen, S., Zhang, X., Takabe, K. & Xu, F. Unraveling variations of crystalline cellulose induced by ionic liquid and their effects on enzymatic hydrolysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 10230 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    David Pot, G. C. et al. Genetic control of pulp and timber properties in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Ann. For. Sci. 59, 563–575 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kinnarinen, T. & Hakkinen, A. Influence of enzyme loading on enzymatic hydrolysis of cardboard waste and size distribution of the resulting fiber residue. Bioresour. Technol. 159, 136–142 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Vicente, A. I. et al. Evolved alkaline fungal laccase secreted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae as useful tool for the synthesis of C–N heteropolymeric dye. J. Mol. Catal. B 134, 323–330 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Vazana, Y., Morais, S., Barak, Y., Lamed, R. & Bayer, E. A. Designer cellulosomes for enhanced hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. Methods Enzym. 510, 429–452 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zverlov, V. V., Kellermann, J. & Schwarz, W. H. Functional subgenomics of Clostridium thermocellum cellulosomal genes: identification of the major catalytic components in the extracellular complex and detection of three new enzymes. Proteomics 5, 3646–3653 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chen, C., Tian, W., Lei, X., Liang, J. & Zhao, J. CASTp 3.0: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W363–W367 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bakan, A. & Bahar, I. The intrinsic dynamics of enzymes plays a dominant role in determining the structural changes induced upon inhibitor binding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14349–14354 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Romero-Romero, M. L. et al. Selection for protein kinetic stability connects denaturation temperatures to organismal temperatures and provides clues to Archaean life. PLoS ONE 11, e0156657 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zou, T., Risso, V. A., Gavira, J. A., Sanchez-Ruiz, J. M. & Ozkan, S. B. Evolution of conformational dynamics determines the conversion of a promiscuous generalist into a specialist enzyme. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 132–143 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kratzer, J. T. et al. Evolutionary history and metabolic insights of ancient mammalian uricases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3763–3768 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zakas, P. M. et al. Enhancing the pharmaceutical properties of protein drugs by ancestral sequence reconstruction. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 35–37 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Shahab, R. L., Luterbacher, J. S., Brethauer, S. & Studer, M. H. Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic biomass to lactic acid by a synthetic fungal-bacterial consortium. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 115, 1207 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gomez-Fernandez, B. J. et al. Directed -in vitro- evolution of Precambrian and extant Rubiscos. Sci. Rep. 8, 5532 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pucci, F., Bourgeas, R. & Rooman, M. Predicting protein thermal stability changes upon point mutations using statistical potentials: introducing HoTMuSiC. Sci. Rep. 6, 23257 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Abascal, F., Zardoya, R. & Posada, D. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21, 2104–2105 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Yang, Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Nozaki, Y. Determination of the concentration of protein by dry weight a comparison with spectrophotometric methods. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 249, 437–446 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Teugjas, H. & Valjamae, P. Selecting beta-glucosidases to support cellulases in cellulose saccharification. Biotechnol. Biofuels 6, 105 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    van Wyk, J. P. H., Sibiya, J. B. M. & Dhlamini, R. B. Saccharification and change of incubation pH during the bioconversion of various waste paper materials with cellulase from Aspergillus niger. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 3, 12–20 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Van Dyk, J. S. P. B.I A review of lignocellulose bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergistic cooperation between enzymes—factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy. Biotechnol. Adv. 30, 1458–1480 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Valbuena, A. et al. On the remarkable mechanostability of scaffoldins and the mechanical clamp motif. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13791–13796 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lamed, R., Kenig, R., Setter, E. & Bayer, E. A. Major characteristics of the cellulolytic system of Clostridium thermocellum coincide with those of the purified cellulosome. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 7, 37–41 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kabsch, W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Evans, P. R. & Murshudov, G. N. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 69, 1204–1214 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Collaborative, Computational Project, The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D 50, 760–763 (1994). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15299374

  55. 55.

    Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845–858 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Bunkoczi, G. et al. Phaser.MRage: automated molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 69, 2276–2286 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 66, 213–221 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 66, 12–21 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Roberts, E., Eargle, J., Wright, D. & Luthey-Schulten, Z. MultiSeq: unifying sequence and structure data for evolutionary analysis. BMC Bioinforma. 7, 382 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An Nlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1-2, 19–25 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Best, R. B. & Hummer, G. Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix−coil transition of polypeptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 9004–9015 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Danne, R. et al. doGlycans—tools for preparing carbohydrate structures for atomistic simulations of glycoproteins, glycolipids, and carbohydrate polymers for GROMACS. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 57, 2401–2406 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kirschner, K. N. et al. GLYCAM06: a generalizable biomolecular force field. Carbohydrates. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 622–655 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Bahar, I., Lezon, T. R., Yang, L.-W. & Eyal, E. Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39, 23–42 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Bakan, A., Bahar, I. & Meireles, L. M. ProDy: protein dynamics inferred from theory and experiments. Bioinformatics 27, 1575–1577 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Ed Bayer’s group for kindly providing the plasmids used in the mini-cellulosome constructs. Research was supported by the Basque Government grant ELKARTEK to R.P.-J, and also partly by Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) grant BIO2016-77390-R, BFU2015-71964 to R.P.-J., BIO2016-74875-P to J.A.G., and CTQ2015-65320-R and RYC-2016-19590 to D.D.S.; European Commission grant CIG Marie Curie Reintegration program FP7-PEOPLE-2014 to R.P.-J, and European Commission grant NMP-FP7 604530-2 (CellulosomePlus), and the ERA-IB EIB.12.022 grant (FiberFuel) funded by the MINECO (PCIN-2013-011-C02-01) to M.C.-V. We also thank Fundación Repsol and Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia for financial support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.P.-J. conceived the project. R.P.-J., D.D.S., A.G.-P., and M.C.-V. designed research. N.B. and R.P.-J. performed phylogenetic analysis. N.B., B.A.-L., A.G.-P., N.J., L.B., L.A., Ma.A., and Mi.A. carried out protein expression, purification, sample preparation, quantification, and activity assays. N.B., A.G.-P., D.D.S., M.C.-V., and R.P.-J. performed data analysis. D.D.S. prepared and ran the computational calculations. J.A.G. crystallized, analyzed, and solved the structure. All authors contributed to writing, revising, completing, and editing the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raul Perez-Jimenez.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barruetabeña, N., Alonso-Lerma, B., Galera-Prat, A. et al. Resurrection of efficient Precambrian endoglucanases for lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis. Commun Chem 2, 76 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-019-0176-6

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.