Abstract
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a severe disease that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although recognized as an immune-mediated condition, the pathogenesis remains unresolved. Furthermore, the absence of a diagnostic test can lead to delayed immunotherapy. Using state-of-the-art mass-spectrometry proteomics, assisted by artificial intelligence (AI), we aimed to identify a diagnostic signature for MIS-C and to gain insights into disease mechanisms. We identified a highly specific 4-protein diagnostic signature in children with MIS-C. Furthermore, we identified seven clusters that differed between MIS-C and controls, indicating an interplay between apolipoproteins, immune response proteins, coagulation factors, platelet function, and the complement cascade. These intricate protein patterns indicated MIS-C as an immunometabolic condition with global hypercoagulability. Our findings emphasize the potential of AI-assisted proteomics as a powerful and unbiased tool for assessing disease pathogenesis and suggesting avenues for future interventions and impact on pediatric disease trajectories through early diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a severe, life-threatening, immunological condition that occurs weeks after infection with SARS-CoV-21,2. Although MIS-C is established as an immunological dysregulation leading to cytokine storm3, the underlying pathogenesis remains unresolved4. The incidence of MIS-C was approximately one in 3000 children infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the pre-Omicron waves, while the incidence decreased substantially as the Omicron variants became dominating5,6,7. This decrease has been attributed to a reduced ability of Omicron to trigger hyperinflammation, as the Omicron variant is phylogenetically distinct from the pre-Omicron variants with enhanced immune escape8. Further, vaccination has been shown to decrease the incidence of MIS-C9,10. Still, sporadic MIS-C cases occur, and resurgence of MIS-C is possible with waning vaccine-induced immunity and novel variants of SARS-CoV-2.
Children with MIS-C present with fever and multiorgan involvement, including mucocutaneous, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular involvement, often accompanied by circulatory shock1,2,6. The condition can be misinterpreted as sepsis, abdominal emergencies, and Kawasaki disease11,12. Thus, the lack of a diagnostic test for MIS-C can lead to delayed lifesaving immunomodulating therapy and prolonged unnecessary courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics.
To address this diagnostic challenge host-specific innovative omics methodologies have been suggested4. Proteomics can provide a comprehensive unbiased approach that investigates hundreds of plasma proteins simultaneously13. Proteomics has the potential to identify plasma proteins useful as diagnostic markers and explore disease mechanisms as circulating plasma proteins are markers of whole-body metabolic processes14. Due to recent technological improvements in proteomics pipelines, a comprehensive system-wide approach has become feasible15. However, a limitation of utilizing novel omics approaches is the interpretation of large amounts of complex data and the translation of this information into clinical medicine. This limitation may be surpassed by employing artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques, which offer a powerful avenue for analyzing comprehensive unbiased proteomic data.
We employed AI-assisted proteomics to develop a unique diagnostic signature for children with MIS-C and to gain insight into the underlying disease mechanisms.
Results
We enrolled 94 children, including 27 cases with MIS-C and 67 febrile controls consisting of 28 children with bacterial infection, 22 with viral infection, 7 with Kawasaki disease, and 10 with severe sepsis (Table 1, Fig. 1A). Children with MIS-C all had PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection including 15 (56%) with the Alpha variant, 11 (41%) with the Delta variant, and one (4%) with the Omicron variant. None had comorbidities. Twenty-one of 27 (78%) presented with shock. Twenty-four (89%) were admitted to intensive care unit or semi-intensive care unit, and 9 (33%) received inotropes. Their blood samples for proteomics were collected before or within 24 h of treatment initiation. In nine of 27 (33%) patients, therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin was initiated before the blood sample was collected. Seven patients with MIS-C had additional samples for proteomics collected on days 2–4 after treatment initiation, and nine had additional samples collected when fully recovered a median of 39 days (19–76) following the diagnosis of MIS-C. All bacterial febrile controls had urinary tract infection confirmed by positive urine dipstick and urine culture with Escherichia coli. Viral controls had fever, proven viral detection in nasopharyngeal specimen, and C-reactive protein below 25 mg/L (Table 1). There were no deaths in any of the groups.
Plasma proteins in children with MIS-C compared to controls
The data set used to identify differences in protein levels included patients with MIS-C, febrile controls with viral and bacterial infections, Kawasaki disease, and severe sepsis (Fig. 1a). We identified 450 plasma proteins across all plasma samples in the initial proteomic analysis (Fig. 1b, c). Three samples were excluded due to low numbers of measurable proteins, all from children with sepsis (Fig. 1d). After data quality assessment, 245 proteins were selected for further analysis. Further, 66 proteins related to therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin were excluded resulting in a total of 179 proteins in the final dataset (source data file: Supplementary Data 1). Overall, proteomic data separated disease categories as visualized by the uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot (Fig. 2a) and the unsupervised heatmap (Fig. 2b), which both revealed a high correlation in children with MIS-C. A total of 105 proteins were significantly different in children with MIS-C compared to febrile controls, Kawasaki disease, and severe sepsis (Fig. 2c; Table 2). Figure 2d displays the overlap between significant proteins findings in MIS-C patients compared to the control groups combined or to each of the control groups separately (Supplementary Data 2).
Most proteins with significantly different levels between children with MIS-C and controls could be categorized into four groups: (1) Immunological response, (2) coagulation, (3) cell death and cell growth, and (4) lipid profile (Table 2). Immunological response: Plasma proteins involved in the immunological response included elevated lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 and Fc Gamma Receptor IIIa, both involved in adaptive immune response, as well as several elevated acute phase reactants including alpha-1-antichymotrypsin. Further, proteins playing a role in the innate immune response were significantly different in children with MIS-C, such as decreased levels of peptidoglycan recognition protein 2, and increased levels of several complement factors (Table 2). Coagulation: Numerous coagulation-related proteins differed significantly in children with MIS-C with reduced coagulation factors XII and XIII, increased procoagulants fibrinogen and Von Willebrand Factor, and reduced anticoagulants, among others antithrombin, protein C, and platelet factor 4. Children with MIS-C also had different levels of proteins related to the recruitment and activation of platelets. Cell death and growth: The levels of actin B, extracellular matrix protein 1, fibronectin, and other proteins implicated in cell and tissue remodeling were affected in MIS-C. Lipid profile: Finally, the lipid profile in children with MIS-C was different from febrile controls with reduced apolipoproteins A, C, and H, and elevated apolipoproteins E and F.
Unsupervised protein-protein co-expression network analyses, guided by machine learning, revealed eight clusters of proteins (Fig. 2e). These co-expression clusters elucidated interactions between apolipoproteins and proteins involved in the immune response (clusters 0, 1, and 2), proteins participating in the complement cascade (cluster 3), proteins involved in coagulation (cluster 4), proteins playing a role in oxygen transport (cluster 6), and proteins impacting platelet function (cluster 7). Cluster 5 was composed of heterogeneous proteins related to coagulation, inflammation, and liver function. The proteins that differed significantly in children with MIS-C were explored by unbiased pathway enrichment analyses and revealed 15 biological pathways, also primarily involving (1) immunological responses, (2) coagulation, (3) cell death and cell growth, and (4) platelet activation (Fig. 2f).
Diagnostic classifier for MIS-C using machine learning
The data set used to develop a diagnostic signature for MIS-C included children with MIS-C and febrile controls with viral and bacterial infections (Fig. 3a). All 12 machine-learning algorithms, except one, had Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) and area under the curve (AUC) between 0.77-1 (Fig. 3b). We continued the subsequent analysis with the support vector classification (SVC) model that had an AUC and MCC of 100% and 1, respectively (Fig. 3b). Recursive feature elimination revealed that only four proteins were necessary to obtain a high predictive performance (Fig. 3c). The four selected proteins were lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1, Fc Gamma Receptor IIIa, alpha-1-antichymotrypsin and butyrylcholinesterase (Table 2; Fig. 3e, Supplementary Data 3).
Validation of the 4-protein diagnostic signature
When the 4-protein diagnostic signature was applied to the test set, an AUC of 100% was achieved (Fig. 3f). The median prediction probability was 83.0% (IQR 11.8) for the patients with MIS-C at the acute stage, 9.1% (IQR 6.0) for viral infections, and 12.2% (IQR 7.1) for bacterial infections (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Data 4). When applying the 4-protein diagnostic signature on the internal validation cohorts, including MIS-C patients on days 2–4 of treatment initiation, fully recovered MIS-C patients, Kawasaki disease and severe sepsis, the combined AUC was 93.4% (95% CI 92.1–94.7). Children with MIS-C, who had received immunomodulating therapy for 2–4 days, had a median prediction probability of 87.7% (IQR 9.3), while children who had recovered fully after MIS-C had a median MIS-C prediction probability of 7.3% (IQR 1.5) (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Data 4). Children with severe sepsis and Kawasaki disease had a median prediction probability of 20.7% (IQR 13.1) and 55.8% (IQR 43.7), respectively.
To evaluate the generalizability of AI-based proteomic prediction of MIS-C, an external U.S. validation cohort of 25 children with MIS-C and 34 healthy controls was investigated (Fig. 3a). As the proteins used in our 4-protein signature were not measured in the external cohort, the 28 plasma proteins measured in both studies were used to assess the validity of our AI-based approach for MIS-C diagnostics. The new support vector classification model including the 28 proteins had a high prediction performance with an AUC of 86.7% (95% CI 79.7-93.7) (Fig. 3f).
Discussion
In this study, we employed AI to complex proteomics data to develop a diagnostic signature for children with MIS-C and explore the underlying biological mechanisms of the disease. The performance of multiple machine learning algorithms revealed that MIS-C could be discriminated from children with bacterial and viral infections as we identified a highly accurate diagnostic signature with an AUC of 100% based on only four proteins. The 4-protein diagnostic signature holds promising avenues for developing a rapid, and low-cost, diagnostic bedside test with important implications for early recognition and targeted treatment. Further, we found proteomics to be a powerful and unbiased tool for assessing disease pathogenesis in children with MIS-C. AI could extract intricate protein patterns, beyond the reach of traditional methods, which indicated MIS-C as a condition with immune dysregulation closely linked to changes in apolipoproteins, global hypercoagulability, and high cell and tissue remodeling.
The diagnosis of MIS-C is based on clinical manifestations and elevated acute phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein, which are often indistinguishable from a wide range of other diseases11,12. The lack of a diagnostic test has resulted in delays with targeted immunomodulating treatment and unnecessary courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The diagnostic signature found in this study was based on only four plasma proteins, of which three were involved in the immune response. Applying the machine learning technique, recursive feature selection, revealed that these four plasma proteins, among a total of 179, were sufficient to differentiate MIS-C from other febrile conditions. Few patients with septic shock and Kawasaki disease were overlapping, reflecting the possible shared pathophysiological features between these conditions. The 4-protein diagnostic signature had high accuracy in children with MIS-C 2–4 days following initiation of immunomodulating therapy. This demonstrates its robustness to delayed sample collection and partial clinical recovery. While we could not validate our 4-protein signature on the external U.S. validation cohort (as those four proteins were not part of their protein panel), we successfully demonstrated the validity of our AI-based approach for MIS-C diagnostics, as the new support vector classification model, using different proteins, also achieved a high diagnostic accuracy of MIS-C. During our algorithm selection, we also found that several models, including different proteins, had high AUCs. This supports that several proteins may be used for an MIS-C signature and emphasizes proteomics as a very powerful tool for MIS-C diagnostics.
Previously, a 3-protein signature has been shown to distinguish MIS-C patients from other disease controls with an AUC of 86% in a study investigating seven host proteins16. Additionally a diagnostic signature based on a 5-gene blood RNA expression signature for MIS-C has been reported17. It was validated with an RT-qPCR assay and revealed a high diagnostic accuracy. Collectively, these results suggest that MIS-C has distinct host responses detectable by both transcriptomics and proteomics, which may be suitable for innovative diagnostic tests. However, a diagnostic test based on few plasma proteins may reveal a faster result and may be cheaper to implement in clinical medicine as a routine laboratory analysis.
The pathogenesis of MIS-C was explored using the extensive proteome dataset obtained by unbiased mass spectrometry, which revealed global changes in mechanisms and pathways involved in the pathogenesis of MIS-C. Immune dysregulation was indicated by the increased levels of proteins in multiple pathways leading to hyperinflammation, including both the innate and adaptive immune response, as described in previous studies18,19,20. Consistently, three of the four proteins in the identified 4-protein signature, were involved in immune dysregulation: Alpha-1-antichymotrypsin is involved in complement activation, while Fc Gamma Receptor IIIa is involved in antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. Further, lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1, which was elevated, indicated activation of T-cells, supporting the hypothesis of a super-antigen-mediated polyclonal T-cell activation21. The last protein in the 4-protein signature was butyrylcholinesterase, which hydrolyzes choline esters and was reduced. The significance of this protein in the pathogenesis of MIS-C is unknown.
We found profound changes in lipid metabolism, consistent with previous studies22,23 Lipid mediators have been described to be involved in vasodilation and increased vascular permeability24, a frequent and severe clinical manifestation of MIS-C6. Further, the unsupervised protein-protein co-expression network analyses conducted by machine learning indicated an intricate connection between apolipoproteins and immune dysregulation, which may be due to the function of lipids as proinflammatory mediators, as described in other conditions25. It suggests MIS-C as an immunometabolic condition26. Alterations in numerous coagulation factors with elevated procoagulants, reduced anticoagulants, and impaired fibrinolysis point towards a global hypercoagulability and may explain the risk of thrombosis in children with MIS-C27. Overall, our results align with those of a previous study, which also reported upregulated Fc Gamma Receptor IIIa, immune and complement activation and reduced lipid transport and clearance mechanisms28. Furthermore, our results were consistent with studies exploring single coagulation factors or coagulation profiles29,30. The significant alterations in proteins related to cell growth, cell death, and/or cell remodeling in children with MIS-C are unprecedented but align with the profound dysregulation of cellular and immunological processes and the multiorgan nature of the disease3,6. These results serve as a proof-of-concept of AI-assisted proteomics in exploring disease mechanisms of new diseases, or complex diseases not yet fully comprehended.
This study has several limitations. First, while the quality and size of the dataset were sufficient to develop a diagnostic signature, the size of our validation cohort was too small to identify significant protein changes between children with MIS-C and Kawasaki disease. Second, there is a possibility of spurious findings, unrelated to MIS-C, in our large proteome dataset, as we were unable to explain the function of all significantly altered proteins. As AI techniques model complex data patterns, understanding the precise features influencing the predictions can be challenging. Nevertheless, the disease mechanisms we discovered are supported by clinical correlations and the existing knowledge of the disease pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Third, we were unable to validate the 4-protein signature from external validation cohorts, as studies including those four proteins have not been published. Further, the decline in the incidence of MIS-C during the Omicron era refrained us from validating the accuracy of the 4-protein signature in a prospective MIS-C cohort. Finally, the MIS-C decline could challenge the relevance of our findings. However, as a resurgence of MIS-C remains possible with new variants and waning vaccine-induced immunity, we find that continuous investigation of this severe and potentially life-threatening disease is important.
In conclusion, we harnessed the power of AI to explore complex proteomic data from children with MIS-C, a condition that remains elusive. The study demonstrated the potential of proteomics to impact pediatric disease trajectories through early diagnosis as we identified a 4-protein diagnostic signature that was accurate in distinguishing MIS-C from children with phenotypically similar diseases. We provided a global characterization of proteomic changes in the pathogenesis of MIS-C, emphasizing AI-assisted proteomics as a powerful and unbiased tool for assessing disease pathogenesis and potentially paving the way for more efficient future interventions.
Methods
This nationwide population-based study prospectively included patients aged 0–17 years with MIS-C from all 18 Danish pediatric departments from April 1, 2020 to March 15, 20226,10. Patients met the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MIS-C case definition. Febrile controls consisted of children with viral and bacterial infections. Patients with Kawasaki, and severe sepsis were enrolled from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic. Children with Kawasaki disease met American Heart Association criteria for complete or incomplete disease. Two pediatric infectious disease specialists adjudicated the final diagnosis for all patients when testing results and clinical outcomes were known.
Sample size calculations were not performed due to the exploratory nature of the study.
Patients were recruited under approval by the research ethics committees of the Ethics Committee of Capital Region of Denmark (H-20028631) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2019-29). Informed oral and written parental consent was provided before participation. All ethical regulations relevant to human research participants were followed. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05334134.
Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry data analysis
Venous blood samples were collected into EDTA-containing tubes, spun at 3000 g for 10 min at 4 °C within 2 h, and stored at -80 °C. Sample preparation for proteomic analysis was performed as previously published31. Samples were analyzed using an Exploris 480 Thermo Fischer Scientific system by Evosep One (Evosep Biosystem, Denmark) and proteomic data were acquired in a data-independent acquisition mode. Proteins related to therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin, including heavy-chains, light-chains, j-chains and variable regions, were excluded32. The mass spectrometry raw files were processed with Spectronaut version 17 (Biognosys, Zurich, Switzerland). A previously generated plasma spectral library containing 2137 protein groups and 16,254 peptides was used.
Statistics and reproducibility
Data was processed using the Clinical Knowledge Graph and Jupyter Notebook33. In short, protein intensities were log-transformed, a stringent filter for missingness was applied (>70% completeness across all samples and at least 50% within each group), and missing values were imputed based on a downshifted normal distribution. Sample quality was assessed as described previously34. Batch correction was performed with Clinical Knowledge Graph (pyCombat) to ensure that the plate a sample was run on would not affect downstream results. Unpaired t-tests were used to identify proteins with significantly different levels between the cohorts. Multiple hypothesis correction was applied using the Benjamini-Hochberg method, with adjusted P-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
UMAP was performed to illustrate the underlying structure of the data. The UMAP plot reduces the multidimensional proteomic data into two dimensions, thereby allowing the separation of patient group by visual interpretation. Hierarchical clustering using Pearson correlation distance was used to compute a sample correlation heatmap. Both the UMAP and heatmap of Pearson correlations were unsupervised, meaning that the grouping of individuals was based on the proteomic data alone and not informed by disease grouping. Volcano plots were used to visualize plasma proteins that differed significantly between MIS-C and controls. Gene Ontology Biological Process enrichment analysis was performed to identify the enrichment of biological processes based on a set of significantly different proteins. Protein-protein co-expression clusters were identified with Clinical Knowledge Graph by Spearman correlation analysis, followed by Louvain network clustering. The clusters were visualized using Cytoscape35.
Supervised machine learning analysis was performed to investigate the feasibility of a diagnostic signature for MIS-C. Our dataset including children with MIS-C and febrile controls with viral and bacterial infections was divided into a training set (80%) for model development and a test set (20%) for model validation in a 5-fold cross-validation scheme. Each set had the same ratio of MIS-C and febrile control samples. Z-scored data (mean 0 and standard deviation 1 within each sample) was used as input. MIS-C diagnosis (yes/no) was used as the classification target. Twelve different machine-learning algorithms were investigated. A final model was based on a hyperparameter search (random grid search specific to each algorithm) and recursive feature elimination (only for models with a feature importance attribute) combined with 5-fold cross-validation to identify the balance point between a minimal combination of proteins and a high predictive performance. Model selection was based on the highest prediction performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC and MCC. Prediction probabilities were calibrated for the final model. Machine learning analyses and model calibration were performed using Python (3.7.9) in combination with the scikit-learn (sklearn) library36. Analyses were performed using the scikit-learn (sklearn) Python library.
The performance of the developed model was tested on both the test set and internal validation cohorts including Kawasaki disease, severe sepsis, and children with MIS-C, both during partial and full recovery. The model was also tested on an external validation cohort from the Proteomics Identifications Database (PRIDE) consisting of 22 children with MIS-C and 25 healthy controls (PXD029375)37. Data were z-scored (sample-wise) and only proteins found in both cohorts were used as features in the model. We used the same algorithm type and hyperparameters as the previous model, but the model was refitted with the new input consisting of the protein overlap between the two cohorts. The model was trained on our training set and applied to the test set and the external validation cohort.
The performance metrics used included the MCC, AUC, ROC curves, the distribution of prediction probabilities, and confusion matrices.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Code availability
The jupyter notebooks are available at https://github.com/nicwin98/MIS-C.
References
Feldstein et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in U.S. children and adolescents. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 334–346 (2020).
Dufort, E. M. et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children in New York state. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 347–358 (2020).
Consiglio, C. R. et al. The immunology of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children with COVID-19. Cell 183, 968–981.e7 (2020).
Burns, J. C. MIS-C: myths have been debunked, but mysteries remain. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 19, 70–71 (2023).
Holm, M. et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children occurred in one of four thousand children with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Acta Paediatr. 110, 2581–2583 (2021).
Nygaard, U. et al. Incidence and clinical phenotype of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant by vaccination status: a danish nationwide prospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 6, 459–465 (2022).
Bybeck Nielsen, A. et al. Clinical manifestations in children with staphylococcal bacteremia positive for panton-valentine leucocidin: a nationwide survey in a low methicillin-resistance setting. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 39, e274–e276 (2020).
Garcia-Beltran, W. F. et al. mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine boosters induce neutralizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant. Cell 185, 457–466.e4 (2022).
Levy, M. et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children by COVID-19 vaccination status of adolescents in France. JAMA 327, 281–283 (2022).
Holm, M. et al. Risk and phenotype of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in vaccinated and unvaccinated Danish children before and during the omicron wave. JAMA Pediatr. 176, 821–823 (2022).
Noval Rivas, M., Porritt, R. A., Cheng, M. H., Bahar, I. & Arditi, M. COVID-19-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C): a novel disease that mimics toxic shock syndrome-the superantigen hypothesis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 147, 57–59 (2021).
Otar Yener, G. et al. Differences and similarities of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, Kawasaki disease and macrophage activating syndrome due to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a comparative study. Rheumatol. Int 42, 879–889 (2022).
McArdle, A. J. & Menikou, S. What is proteomics? Arch. Dis. Child Educ. Pr. Ed. 106, 178–181 (2021).
Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature 537, 347–355 (2016).
Geyer, P. E., Holdt, L. M., Teupser, D. & Mann, M. Revisiting biomarker discovery by plasma proteomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 942 (2017).
Yeoh, S. et al. Plasma Protein Biomarkers Distinguish Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children From Other Pediatric Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 43, 444–453 (2024).
Jackson, H. R. et al. Diagnosis of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children by a whole-blood transcriptional signature. J. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. Soc. 12, 322–331 (2023).
Sacco, K. et al. Immunopathological signatures in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and pediatric COVID-19. Nat. Med. 28, 1050–1062 (2022).
Ramaswamy, A. et al. Immune dysregulation and autoreactivity correlate with disease severity in SARS-CoV-2-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Immunity 54, 1083–1095.e7 (2021).
Syrimi, E. et al. The immune landscape of SARS-CoV-2-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) from acute disease to recovery. iScience 24, 103215 (2021).
Porritt, R. A. et al. HLA class I-associated expansion of TRBV11-2 T cells in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. J. Clin. Invest 131, e146614 (2021).
Mietus-Snyder, M. et al. Changes in HDL cholesterol, particles, and function associate with pediatric COVID-19 severity. Front Cardiovasc. Med. 9, 1033660 (2022).
Verduci, E. et al. Blood fatty acids profile in MIS-C children. Metabolites 11, 721 (2021).
Medzhitov, R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 454, 428–435 (2008).
Cioccari, L., Luethi, N. & Masoodi, M. Lipid mediators in critically Ill patients: a step towards precision medicine. Front Immunol. 11, 599853 (2020).
Pucino, V. & Guma, M. Editorial: The role of immunometabolism in autoimmune mediated and autoinflammatory disorders. Front Immunol. 13, 969939 (2022).
Kumar, R., Rivkin, M. J. & Raffini, L. Thrombotic complications in children with coronavirus disease 2019 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome of childhood. J. Thromb. Haemost. 21, 2313–2326 (2023).
Porritt, R.A. et al. The autoimmune signature of hyperinflammatory multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. J Clin Invest. 131, e151520 (2021).
Boucher, A. A. et al. Prolonged elevations of factor VIII and von willebrand factor antigen after multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 45, e427–e432 (2023).
Ankola, A. A. et al. Coagulation profiles and viscoelastic testing in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 68, e29355 (2021).
Geyer, P. E. et al. Plasma proteome profiling to assess human health and disease. Cell Syst. 2, 185–195 (2016).
Barahona Afonso, A. F. & João, C. M. P. The production processes and biological effects of intravenous immunoglobulin. Biomolecules 6, 15 (2016).
Santos, A. et al. A knowledge graph to interpret clinical proteomics data. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 692–702 (2022).
Geyer, P. E. et al. Plasma proteome profiling to detect and avoid sample-related biases in biomarker studies. EMBO Mol. Med. 11, e10427 (2019).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Diorio, C. et al. Proteomic profiling of MIS-C patients indicates heterogeneity relating to interferon gamma dysregulation and vascular endothelial dysfunction. Nat. Commun. 12, 7222 (2021).
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D543–D552 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We thank Christine Rasmussen (Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg) for her time planning, preparing and the proteomic analysis and we also acknowledge the Clinical Proteomic Group at the NNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen. Funding was received from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant NNF19OC0055001) to Nicolai Jacob Wewer Albrechtsen supporting LD, MO, and CR, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research is supported financially by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (Grant agreement NNF14CC0001). Funding was received from the National Ministry of Higher Education and Science (grant 0237–00004B), Innovation Fund Denmark (0176–00020B), Greater Copenhagen Health Science Partners (CAG CHILD) to Kjeld Schmiegelow, Ulrikka Nygaard, and Nadja Hawwa Vissing supporting KHSD, LSS, and MH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
UN, Annelaura Bach Nielsen (ABN), KHSD, LD, MH, Allan Nielsen (AN), JPG, LSS, DC, IMJ, KS, NHV and NJWA conceptualized this nationwide study. UN, KS, NHV, MM and NJWA obtained funding for the study. UN, KHSD, MH, AN, JPG, NHV and LSS obtained clinical details for patients with MIS-C through electronic medical records. UN, ABN, LD, KHSD, NHV and NJWA had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis. UN, ABN, LD, MEO, THM, KHSD, NHV and NJWA analyzed data. UN, ABN, KHSD, NHV and NJWA drafted the first version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the data interpretation. All authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors finally approved the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks Shea Hamilton and other anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Mark Collins and Joao Valente. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nygaard, U., Nielsen, A.B., Dungu, K.H.S. et al. Proteomic profiling reveals diagnostic signatures and pathogenic insights in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Commun Biol 7, 688 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06370-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06370-8
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.