Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

We're hiring! Check out the job ad for more info. Apply by Nov 1st!

De novo necroptosis creates an inflammatory environment mediating tumor susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapies using monoclonal antibodies to block inhibitory checkpoints are showing durable remissions in many types of cancer patients, although the majority of breast cancer patients acquire little benefit. Human melanoma and lung cancer patient studies suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors are often potent in patients that already have intratumoral T cell infiltrate; although it remains unknown what types of interventions can result in an intratumoral T cell infiltrate in breast cancer. Using non-T cell-inflamed mammary tumors, we assessed what biological processes and downstream inflammation can overcome the barriers to spontaneous T cell priming. Here we show a specific type of combination therapy, consisting of oncolytic virus and chemotherapy, activates necroptosis and limits tumor growth in autochthonous tumors. Combination therapy activates proinflammatory cytokines; intratumoral influx of myeloid cells and cytotoxic T cell infiltrate in locally treated and distant autochthonous tumors to render them susceptible to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Introduction

The immune system maintains homeostasis through antigen-specific elimination of tumor cells and preventing tumor growth1. Successful generation of T-cell-mediated immunity involves tumor antigen presentation, a process fine-tuned by co-stimulatory/inhibitory signals and cytokines that regulate the activation of tumor-specific naive T cells to become effector T cells2. Various types of immunotherapies were developed through the modulation of immune regulatory mechanisms governing antitumor T cells. Of particular interest, the use of monoclonal antibodies to block inhibitory T-cell receptor signaling, collectively called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), are integrated into patient standard of care to treat multiple cancer types3,4,5,6. However, the overall proportion of patients that respond to ICI is remarkably low owing to numerous adaptive resistance mechanisms orchestrated by tumors to defeat intrinsically developed antitumor immunity7,8. There is no definitive biomarker of ICI yet, although correlates such as, neoantigen load9,10, expression of inhibitory checkpoint ligands, interferon11 and proinflammatory signatures12, were showed to predict efficacy of ICI.

Certain types of cell death modalities emit proinflammatory signals to stimulate tumor antigen presentation and intratumoral T-cell infiltration. Cell death stimuli initiated by anthracyclines13, photodynamic therapy14, and oncolytic viruses15,16,17 elicit premortem tumor cell endoplasmic reticulum stress leading to calreticulin exposure18 along with release of ATP19,20,21 and high mobility group box 120,21, resulting in potent antigen presentation22 and adaptive immunity. Although cell death inducers were extensively studied in immune-responsive transplanted tumors13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22, it remains largely unknown what types of combination therapies, cell death modalities, and downstream inflammatory signals can heat-up cold and immunosuppressive tumor types such as breast cancer23,24.

Genetically engineered mouse models of breast cancer have assisted the functional characterization of biological processes implicated in human breast cancers although they have not been extensively used to develop breast cancer immunotherapies25,26. Autochthonous tumors driven by overexpression of the rat oncogene Neu (NeuT) in BALB-NeuT mice are highly immunosuppressive and fail to spontaneously prime T cells or after immunogenic chemotherapy23. Consistent with previous reports25,26, here we report that monotherapies of chemotherapy and oncolytic virus had significant anticancer activity. The list of ICD-inducing agents is expanding although their immunomodulatory effects when applied in combination are understudied. A combined administration of oHSV-1 and Mitomycin-C extends survival of autochthonous tumor-bearing mice. This immunogenic combination therapy relies on necroptosis to activate immune-dependent anticancer effect during therapy and prophylactic vaccination. Ablation of necrosome formation in the context of therapy and dying tumor cell vaccination results in loss of efficacy. Further characterization of the tumor immune landscape shows that immunogenic therapy activates desirable inflammation and cytokine/chemokine secretion to elicit intracellular T-cell infiltration thereby rendering non-immunogenic tumors susceptible to ICI.

Results

A combination of oncolytic virus and chemotherapy extends survival of autochthonous tumor-bearing mice

We previously used TUBO cells (originally isolated from a spontaneous mammary tumor of BALB-NeuT mice25) in transplantation experiments to show that oHSV-1 induces markers of ICD and prolongs survival in 50% of tumor-bearing mice27,28. To further evaluate the systemic antitumor effects of locally applied ICD-inducing agents (oHSV-1 and chemotherapeutics) in autochthonous tumors we utilized mouse models of breast carcinogenesis driven by overexpression of the rat oncogene Neu (NeuT)25,26. Female mice that express NeuT oncogene acquire highly aggressive mammary tumors25,26. In all of the studies, we treated the first palpable tumor and monitored the total tumor burden arising in all of the mammary glands. Although Mitomycin-C (Mito) and Mitoxantrone (MTX) monotherapies slowed tumor growth (Fig. 1b), no monotherapy had significant tumor controlling or survival benefit on their own (Fig. 1a–c). We previously showed that in transplantable TUBO tumors combination therapy of oHSV-1 and MTX results in 69% survival of tumor-bearing mice29. Thus, we hypothesized that the combined administration of oHSV-1 with chemotherapeutics would provide multiple danger and pathogen signals for enhanced antitumor effect27,29,30,31,32,33. We combined oHSV-1 with ICD-inducing (MTX or Doxorubicin; Dox) or a non-ICD-inducing chemotherapy (Mitomycin-C). Administration of oHSV-1 in combination with MTX or Dox had no significant tumor controlling effect (Fig. 1d) or survival benefit (Fig. 1e). Rather the combined application of oHSV-1 with Mito had a statistically significant tumor controlling effect in BALB-NeuT mice (Fig. 1e, f).

Fig. 1: ICD-inducing monotherapies fail to limit tumor growth while combination therapy of Mito-C+oHSV-1 extends survival.
figure1

a Outline of treatment regimens for chemotherapy and oHSV-1 in autochthonous tumors of BALB-NeuT mice. b, c Treatment with ICD-inducing monotherapies (MTX, Dox, oHSV-1) and non-ICD-inducing (Mito) neither limit tumor growth nor extend survival of tumor-bearing mice. d, e Among the various combinations of oHSV-1 and chemotherapy, Mito+oHSV-1 limits tumor growth and extends survival of tumor-bearing BALB-neuT mice. f Individual mice total tumor volumes as a proxy for tumor burden of BALB-NeuT mice treated with various combination therapies. Quantitative data are mean±standard deviation of total tumor volumes (Kruskal–Wallis test) b, d and Kaplan–Meier survival (Log-rank, Mantel–Cox test) c, e. All the data presented in this figure are pooled from at least two independent experiments done at different times.

Necroptosis is essential for the therapeutic effect of immunogenic therapy

To investigate the mechanism by which Mito+oHSV-1 exerts anticancer effect, day 6 tumors were harvested and stained for markers of virus replication, endothelial cell damage, and cell death. Monotherapies of Dox and Mito had insignificant cell death and endothelial cell damage (Fig. 2a–d). Compared with oHSV-1 and Dox+oHSV-1, Mito+oHSV-1 showed a higher level of intratumoral virus replication (Fig. 2a, b) despite in vitro addition of Mito or Dox reducing oHSV-1 replication (Supplementary fig. 1). Mito+oHSV-1 did not alter CD31 levels within tumors (Fig. 2a, c). All the monotherapies (oHSV-1, Dox, Mito) did not affect the level of apoptosis as measured by cleaved caspase 3 (Fig. 2a, d) and necroptosis as assessed by the level of p-MLKL (Fig. 3a). However, Mito+oHSV-1 therapy showed significantly higher apoptosis (Fig. 2a, d) and necroptosis (Fig. 3b, Supplementary fig. 2a, b).

Fig. 2: Mitomycin+oHSV-1 combination increases virus replication and tumor cell death.
figure2

a Visualization of oHSV-1 replication (using a polyclonal antibody that detects major HSV-1 structural proteins), vascular damage (using endothelial cell marker CD31), apoptotic cell death (using cleaved caspase 3) on day 6 after start of treatment. bd Immunohistochemistry positive signal were quantified and plotted. Quantitative data are mean±standard deviation of fold changes of positive signal relative to PBS control group. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison as a post hoc test was used to test statistical significance.

Fig. 3: Therapeutic efficacy of immunogenic combination therapy relies on necroptosis.
figure3

a, b Immunoblots of protein harvested from tumors at 96 h after start of Mito+oHSV-1 treatment show higher normalized p-MLKL and cleaved caspase 3 fluorescence intensity (n = 3 per treatment, labeled 1–3). Uncropped images are displayed in Supplementary Fig. 3. c Average total tumor volume of mice treated with Mito+oHSV-1 along with daily intraperitoneal administration of Nec-1s or Pan-Caspase inhibitor (ZVad-FMK) from day 1 to day 5. Quantitative data are mean±standard deviation from n = 5 mice per treatment group. d Average tumor burden 16 days after vaccination of naïve BALB-NeuT mice with in vitro killed TUBO cells (a cell line isolated from BALB-NeuT spontaneous tumors) (by freeze/thawing (n = 10) or 24 h after treatment with Mito+oHSV-1 (n = 12) or Dox+oHSV-1 (n = 9)). Dying TUBO cells were used to vaccinate 110 days old BALB-neuT mice with small palpable tumors. Quantitative data are mean±standard deviation. e Total tumor volume of BALB-NeuT mice 16 days after vaccination with dying wild type TUBO cells 24 h after Mito+oHSV-1 (n = 7), Mito+oHSV-1+Nec-1s (n = 9), and Nec-1s treatment (n = 4). Alternatively TUBO cells lacking MLKL (Supplementary fig. 4) were used for vaccination either 24 h after treatment with Mito+oHSV-1 (n = 9) or freeze/thawing (n = 5). Quantitative data are mean±standard deviation. Statistical significance of mean tumor volumes were tested using Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison as a post hoc test.

Next, we evaluated which type of cell death is essential for the therapeutic effect of Mito+oHSV-1. Inhibition of caspases using a pan-caspase inhibitor partially offset the therapeutic benefit (Fig. 3c), whereas inhibition of necrosome formation using systemic Nec-1s administration34 significantly abolished the anticancer effect of Mito+oHSV-1 (Fig. 3c). Nec-1s+Mito+oHSV-1 treatment did not exert a statistically significant change in total lymphocyte numbers (CD4+ and CD8+) in the periphery compared with PBS control and Mito+oHSV-1 treatments (Supplementary fig. 3a, b). An established method for evaluating immune stimulating and antitumor effects of an ICD inducer is to administer in vitro killed cells as a vaccine35,36. TUBO cells were previously characterized murine tumor cell line established from spontaneous mammary tumors of BALB-NeuT mice25. BALB/NeuT mice vaccinated with dying TUBO cells treated with Mito+HSV-1, but not Dox+oHSV-1, showed significant delay in the growth of spontaneous tumors (Fig. 3d). Moreover, Nec-1s treatment or deletion of MLKL (via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout; supplementary fig. S4) abrogates the antitumor effects of the vaccine (Fig. 3e). Overall, these results suggest that necroptosis is an integral part of Mito+oHSV-1 mediated immunotherapeutic effect.

Combination therapy displays a proinflammatory cytokine signature and T-cell-mediated anticancer effect

To evaluate the cytokine/chemokine milieu during therapy, we analyzed the level of 31 cytokines/chemokines in tumor homogenates in treated and control mice. Untreated BALB-NeuT tumors display higher levels of immunosuppressive cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10) that are significantly downregulated after oHSV-1, Dox+oHSV-1, and Mito+oHSV-1 treatment (Supplementary fig. 5a). Other cytokines commonly upregulated by multiple therapies include Eotaxin, IL-6, and IL-15 (Supplementary fig. 5b). Cytokines/chemokines that did not show significant change include GCSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF), IL-1b, IL-2, IL-3, IL-7, IL-9, IL-12, IP-10, CXCL-1, MIG, and VEGF (Supplementary fig. 5c). Proinflammatory cytokines (RANTES, TNF-alpha, IL-1a, IL-13, IL-17, LIF, MCSF) and chemokines (Macrophage inhibitory protein 1a (MIP1a) (CCL3), MIP1b (CCL4), Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) (Fig. 4a) were differentially up-regulated in Mito+oHSV-1 treated tumors. Consistent with the chemokine signature, Mito+oHSV-1 treated tumors showed higher Ly6G+ (Fig. 4b, c) and F4/80+ (Fig. 4d, e) immune cell influx 96 h after start of treatment. When Nec-1s is administered along with Mito+oHSV-1, the Ly6G+ population is significantly reduced (Fig. 4b, c). Moreover, both Mito+oHSV-1 treated and untreated control tumors did not show intratumoral Treg infiltration (Supplementary fig. 6). Overall, these studies show that de novo necroptosis activation results in intratumoral myeloid cell infiltrate.

Fig. 4: Mito+oHSV-1 shows necrosome-dependent proinflammatory signature.
figure4

a Mito+oHSV-1 treated mammary tumors were harvested 96 h post start of treatment and tumor homogenates assayed for expression of 31 cytokines and chemokines. be Therapy-induced inflammation during Mito+oHSV-1 shows necrosome-dependent Ly6G+ infiltration. Autochthonous tumors of BALB-NeuT mice treated with Mito+oHSV-1 and/or Nec-1s were harvested 96 h post start of treatment and stained for Ly6G b, c and F4/80 d, e. Quantitative data are mean±standard deviation. Statistical significance was tested with one-way ANOVA or non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison as a post hoc test a, c, e. All the experiments in this figure are generated from five mice per treatment group.

Given the inflammatory cytokine milieu and the influx of myeloid cells during Mito+oHSV-1, we hypothesized that these early events may contribute to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte infiltration within tumor lesions. To evaluate the intratumoral infiltration of CD8+ T cells, we isolated day 10 treated and untreated tumors (within the same mouse) for immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of CD3/CD8 surface markers. While untreated tumors of BALB-NeuT mice lack T-cell infiltration, Mito+oHSV-1 treated and distant untreated tumors within the same mouse show higher levels of CD3+CD8+ T-cell infiltration (Fig. 5a, b). Quantification of the IHC signal shows that distant tumors are significantly infiltrated with CD3+CD8+ T cells. However, Mito+oHSV-1-treated tumors by day 10 show mostly dying tumor cells and loss of tumor architecture. As a result, the IHC quantification did not show significant T-cell infiltration in treated tumors. Inhibiting necrosome formation during Mito+oHSV-1 results in significant reduction of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte infiltration in distantly located untreated tumors (Fig. 5a, b). The abscopal effects of Mito+oHSV-1 is not an outcome of virus replication in untreated tumors, as there is no detectable virus replication in distant tumors following in vivo imaging of virus replication and IHC staining for HSV-1 structural proteins27 (Supplementary fig. 7).

Fig. 5: Immunogenic Mito+oHSV-1 therapy CD8+ T-cell infiltration in distant tumor lesions.
figure5

a, b Ten days after Mito+oHSV-1 treatment treated and distant untreated tumor lesions were processed for IHC staining using CD3 and CD8 antibodies. Fold change in positive signal was calculated relative to the PBS controls. Quantitative data are mean±standard deviation from each treatment group (n = 5) (Statistical significance was tested with one-way ANOVA or non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison as a post hoc test). c BALB-neuT mice were treated with Mito+oHSV-1 along with monoclonal antibodies to deplete T cells (CD4 and CD8) or isotype control antibody. Quantitative data are Kaplan–Meier survival (Log-rank, Mantel–Cox test).

To evaluate the importance of T lymphocytes in the therapeutic outcome of Mito+oHSV-1, we conducted survival studies in the presence or absence of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Depletion of T cells (CD4+ and CD8+) using monoclonal antibodies reduces the efficacy of Mito+oHSV-1 indicating that the therapeutic efficacy of Mito+oHSV-1 is T-cell mediated (Fig. 5c).

Therapy-induced necroptosis renders autochthonous tumors susceptible to ICIs

The extent of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T-cell density is significantly associated with improved clinical outcome37, although tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells isolated from patient tumors often display exhausted phenotypes characterized by an impaired ability to secrete effector cytokines, high expression of inhibitory receptors and altered signaling pathways33. Immunological interventions to block inhibitory receptors at the priming (anti-CTLA-4) and effector (anti-PD-1) stages are able to reinvigorate exhausted T cells, leading to significant therapeutic benefit in multiple human cancer types3,4,38,39,40. Human studies have found that patients harboring non-T-cell-inflamed tumors fare worse during ICI. Moreover, combined anti-CTLA-4+anti-PD-1 therapy has enhanced efficacy that exceeded either of the anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 monotherapies in melanoma patients4. Overall, breast cancer has low mutational load and it has not been intensively investigated for its susceptibility to clinical immunotherapies41. ICI using anti-CTLA-4+anti-PDL-1 is undergoing clinical evaluation in breast cancer patients42. ICD-inducing agents have a potential to be combined with ICI to treat immunologically cold breast cancer tumors.

As Mito+oHSV-1-mediated necroptosis induce systemic intratumoral cytotoxic T-lymphocyte infiltration, we hypothesized that this treatment may synergize with clinically used anti-CTLA-4+anti-PDL-1 ICI therapy4. Untreated tumors of BALB-NeuT mice lack intratumoral cytotoxic T lymphocytes and thus do not benefit from ICI (anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-L1). Moreover, Dox+oHSV-1+ICI does not show significant survival or tumor control (Fig. 6a–c, e). However, administration of ICI with Mito+oHSV-1 shows significant anticancer effect evidenced by lower tumor volume (Fig. 6a), tumor multiplicity (Fig. 6b) and prolonged survival of tumor-bearing Balb-NeuT mice (Fig. 6c). Individual mouse tumor plots of Mito+oHSV-1+ICI-treated mice show that a fraction of mice were tumor free for 40 days before relapse (Fig. 6e). Consistent with the essential role of necrosome in Mito+oHSV-1 anticancer immunity, administration of Nec-1s during the triple combination therapy abrogates the survival benefit of Mito+oHSV-1+ICI (Fig. 6d).

Fig. 6: Immunogenic Mito+oHSV-1 therapy renders tumors susceptible to immune checkpoint inhibitors in necrosome-dependent manner.
figure6

BALB-neuT mice treated with Mito-C+oHSV-1/Dox+oHSV-1 were concurrently treated with antibodies targeting CTLA-4 and PDL-1 (immune checkpoint inhibitor; ICI). Antitumor effect was evaluated by tumor volume reduction a, multiplicity of autochthonous mammary tumors b as well as prolonged Kaplan–Meier survival c. The statistical significance of tumor volume differences and multiplicity of tumors were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test. d Inhibition of necrosome using Nec-1s abrogates the efficacy of Mito+oHSV-1+ICI. Quantitative data are Kaplan–Meier survival (Log-rank, Mantel–Cox test). The statistical significance of the survival differences in c and d was analyzed using Log-rank (Mantel–Cox). e Individual mice total tumor volumes as a proxy for tumor burden of BALB-NeuT mice after therapy. All the data presented are pooled from at least two independent experiments done at different times.

Discussion

Tumors hide from immune recognition and subsequent attack by evading immune-stimulatory cell death43, downregulating MHC expression and secreting suppressive chemokines and cytokines44. As a result, cell death insults that activate premortem stress and subsequent expression of immunomodulatory molecules can be one of the ways to reinstate immunosurveillance by promoting tumor antigen uptake and presentation45. Using autochthonous tumors, our study demonstrates that (1) combining different classes of “bona fide” ICD-inducing agents (oncolytic virus and chemotherapy) provides a rational combinatorial therapy that activates antitumor immune response in necroptosis dependent fashion (2) immunogenic Mito+oHSV-1 therapy activates an inflammatory immune contexture associated with proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine signature and influx of myeloid cells and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte infiltrate in distant tumors, and (3) therapy-induced necroptosis is an essential aspect of Mito+oHSV-1 therapy to render tumors susceptible to ICIs.

Autochthonous tumors are highly immune suppressive and lack an intratumoral T-cell infiltrate and thus often monotherapies fail to show immunotherapeutic effect. We found out that locally administered monotherapies of Dox, Mitoxantrone, Mitomycin-C13, and oHSV-127 fail to extend survival of autochthonous tumor-bearing mice. In support of this, a previous study showed that the anticancer effect of chemotherapies in autochthonous tumors of BALB-NeuT and conditional K14cre; Cdh1flox/flox; Trp53flox/flox mice operates independent of the adaptive immune system23. However, both of the chemotherapies were able to show intratumoral CD3+ T-cell infiltrate, although the absence of lymphocytes in Rag−/− mice did not change the outcome of mammary tumorigenesis. Among the three combination therapies we tested, only Mito+oHSV-1 treatment showed adaptive immune response in a therapeutic and prophylactic vaccination setting. In support of this findings, a systemic immunogenic combination chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide–oxaliplatin) in KrasLSL-G12D/+; Trp53flox/flox lung adenocarcinoma tumors leads to ICD-dependent CD8+ T-cell infiltration and synergy with ICI45. Collectively, these findings suggest that certain combinations of ICD-inducing therapies can exert immune-mediated anticancer effects in autochthonous tumors.

Compared with transplanted TUBO tumors29, autochthonous BALB-NeuT tumors are highly resistant to therapy. The median survival days and percentage of tumor-free mice after combination therapy are higher in transplanted tumors29 compared with autochthonous tumors in this study. These differences can be attributed to the tumor cell’s ability to sense cell death stimuli and release immunomodulatory molecules30, and the tumor immune landscape prior to therapy46. Moreover, tumor intrinsic oncogenic events may also dictate the differences in therapeutic efficacy by modulating tumor cell death signaling47 and influencing the tumor immune microenvironment48.

Depending on the models used necroptosis has immune-stimulatory21,49,50 as well as immunosuppressive effects51. During oHSV-1 monotherapy, we did not observe intratumoral necroptosis at multiple time points, although HSV-1 activates necroptosis in mouse cells while it uses its viral protein ICP6 to block necroptosis in human cells52,53. Our findings support that ICD-inducing properties arising from necroptosis correlates with efficacy of Mito+oHSV-1 treatment. Using Nec-1s to inhibit RIPK1-mediated necrosome formation in the context of Mito+oHSV-1 treatment leads to the loss of immunotherapeutic effect. Although Nec-1s is the preferred inhibitor of RIPK1 for in vivo use54, there are limitations associated with the systemic use of RIPK1 inhibitors owing to pleotropic effects of a related inhibitor Nec-1 in multiple inflammatory pathways and T-cell metabolism54,55. To complement experiments involving systemic Nec-1s administration, we vaccinated with dying tumor cells lacking MLKL and show that immunogenic effects of Mito+oHSV-1 treated dying cells are lost. Overall, our finding is in accordance with studies that showed antitumor immune effects of dying necroptotic cells against immunogenic tumors21,49,50.

Despite heterogeneity of breast cancer, targeted therapies provide durable responses with the exception of metastatic and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)56. In general, breast cancer is not well infiltrated by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) compared with immunogenic lung and melanoma tumors. However, TNBC can display substantial immune infiltrate and patients that harbor tumors with enhanced immunomodulatory genes and/or intratumoral antitumor lymphocytes have a better prognosis57,58,59. A significant proportion of TNBC patient tumors have higher PD-L1 levels. As a result, treatment of TNBC patients with PD-1 blockade antibody (pembrolizumab) shows an overall response rate of 18.5%60. Use of ICI with inflammation-inducing chemotherapy and oncolytic viruses61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68 has gained conceptual popularity in preclinical and clinical studies69. This is evidenced by FDA’s recent approval of atezolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1, plus chemotherapy (abraxane; nab-paclitaxel) for the treatment of adults with PD-L1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic TNBC69. Moreover, different types of oncolytic viruses display additive/synergistic therapeutic efficacy when combined with ICI61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68 although mechanisms of synergy are not clearly identified.

Intratumoral administration of talimogene laherparepvec, a genetically engineered HSV-1 expressing GMCSF, showed higher levels of systemic and intratumoral cytotoxic T-lymphocyte infiltrate along with high PD-L1 expression in treated melanoma patient tumors70. Consequently, a combination of anti-PD-1 and talimogene laherparepvec therapy shows synergy to achieve 33% complete response in metastatic melanoma patients70. Although human trials have showed monotherapies of ICD-inducing agents can synergize with ICI69,70, the proportion of patients with a complete response remain quite low. It remains unknown if combining different classes of ICD inducers can be harnessed to turn on cold human tumors. Moreover, the biological processes that predict therapeutic outcome in combinatorial therapy are currently lacking. Our study provides preclinical insight that a combination of chemotherapy and oncolytic virus activates necroptosis to convert TIL-autochthonous mammary tumors into TIL+tumors that become susceptible to ICI.

In immune-responsive transplanted tumors, necroptotic fibroblasts provide adjuvant signals to facilitate immune-mediated anticancer effects49,50,71. Although the feasibility of vaccinating human cancer patients with necroptotic cells is not yet clear21,49, utilizing the immunological benefits of therapy-induced necroptosis along with ICIs may have a translational potential. In line with this, several clinically used small molecules, natural compounds and engineered oncolytic viruses that selectively induce necroptosis have a potential for synergy with ICIs72. Future studies should aim to characterize the immunotherapeutic potential of therapy-induced necroptosis in human breast cancer patients.

Methods

Study design

The aim of this study was to understand the immune-stimulatory effects of oncolytic virotherapy and various chemotherapeutics in treatment of spontaneously arising mammary tumors. We adopted an autochthonous mouse model that recapitulates a tumor model that fails to undergo spontaneous T-cell priming. We used this model to administer treatments locally at one of the tumor sites and measure systemic effect by measuring tumor volumes arising from all the 10 mammary glands.

For in vivo anticancer studies, the primary endpoint is tumor size. We have conducted several previous studies using transplantable and autochthonous tumors and determined that n = 5–10 is an appropriate sample size per treatment group. There were no samples or animals excluded from the analysis. For most of the experiments reported in this manuscript the efficacy of the treatments were assessed in tumor volume as a proxy for tumor growth. As a result, before animals are allocated to any treatment group their tumor volume was measured and mice were randomized to achieve equal tumor volume per treatment group.

Cells culture

Human osteosarcoma cells (U2OS; American Type Culture Collection; ATCC, Manassas, VA) were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). TUBO is a cell line generated from a spontaneous mammary gland tumor of a BALB-neuT mouse25. TUBO cells are a generous gift of Dr. Guido Forni, who developed them originally. All the cell lines were mycoplasma tested and they were free of mycoplasma during the study period. TUBO cells were maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS. All media contained 2 mmol/l l-glutamine, 100U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco). All cell lines were grown at 37 °C under humidified conditions.

Oncolytic HSV-1

The oHSV-1 has a deletion of the entire ICP0-coding region and has been previously described27. Viruses were propagated and tittered on U2OS cells in the presence of 3 mmol/l hexamethylene bisacetamide (Sigma; St. Louis, MO). Virus purification and concentration were done using sucrose cushion ultracentrifugation27.

Western blotting

Protein samples were harvested after lysing cells in radioimmunoprecipitation buffer (10 mM phosphate pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma; St. Louis, MO) and phosphatase inhibitors cocktail II and III (Sigma; St. Louis, MO). Protein extracts were resolved in 10–15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Blots were blocked in Odessey blocking buffer (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska). Western blotting detection was done after incubation with primary antibodies (anti-p-MLKL antibody, Cat#ab196436, Abcam; anti-total-MLKL, Cat#AP14272B, Abcepta; anti-cleaved caspase 3 antibody, Cat#9661, Cell Signaling Technology; and anti-beta-actin antibody, Cat#4967, Cell Signaling Technology) infrared dye-conjugated secondary antibody (Donkey-anti-Rabbit IgG-800CW conjugated, Cat#92632213, LI-COR Biosciences) using Odssey Scanner (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska).

CRISPR knockout cell line

Design and cloning of sgRNAs targeting mouse MLKL were done as previously described73. In brief, the sgRNAs sequences targeting MLKL (Forward 5′-GCACACGGTTTCCTAGACGC-3′, Reverse 5′-GCGTCTAGGAAACCGTGTGC-3′) were cloned into BsmbI digested LentiCRISPR v2 plasmid (Addgene, Cambridge, MA). Single guide RNAs-Cas9 cassettes were introduced to TUBO cells by using lentivirus-mediated gene transfer. Lentivirus transduced cells were selected using 1 μg/ml Puromycin for at least 2 weeks and depletion of the protein was verified by immunoblotting.

Treatment with chemotherapeutics and oHSV-1

Mice were maintained at the McMaster University Central Animal Facility and all procedures were performed in full compliance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care and approved by the Animal Research Ethics Board of McMaster University. Weaned mice were genotyped for the presence of the transgenes. Transgenic mice (BALB-NeuT, Gp/PyMT, FVB-NeuT) were allowed to age for 110 days or until the mammary glands start to develop palpable tumors. In the entire study, tumor measurements and treatments were initiated once the first tumor reached palpable size. Chemotherapeutics were administered once and in the combination setting, chemotherapeutics were administered 1 day prior to intratumoral oncolytic virus treatment (three doses of 2 × 107 pfu27). Chemotherapeutic doses were 860 mM (1.25 mg/Kg) Dox hydrochloride (Sigma; St. Louis, MO), 6 mM Mito-C (4 mg/Kg) (Sigma; St. Louis, MO) or 5 μM MTX (Sigma; St. Louis, MO) (6.5 mg/Kg)13,74, administered intratumorally in 50 μl volume. The RIPK1 inhibitor (Nec-1s) (BioVision, Milpitas, CA) was administered at a dose of 6 mg/kg. The pan-caspase inhibitor ZVAD-FMK (Minneapolis, MN) was used at a dose of 10 mg/kg. Inhibitors or the 5% dimethyl sulphoxide vehicle control were administered intraperitoneally every day for 4 days of Mito+oHSV-1 treatment. All tumors arising from the 10 mammary glands were measured every three days until mice reach endpoint. Mice having a total tumor volume above 525 mm3 were classified as endpoint and sacrificed29.

Vaccination with dying TUBO cells

BALB-NeuT mice were vaccinated with dying TUBO cells. The control group was vaccinated with TUBO cells that were freeze-thawed. TUBO cells were infected with HSV-1 dICP0 at MOI of 3 for 1 h and then add back media with 25 μM Dox or 30 μM Mito-C was applied29. Nec-1s was used in the context of Mito+oHSV-1 treatment at 100 μM. Cells were incubated for 24 hr before scrapping to pellet the cells for vaccination. Each mouse was vaccinated with three million dying cells. Mammary glands were palpated and measured every 3 days.

Immunohistochemistry

Treated and control mammary tumors were fixed in 10% formalin for 48 h and then transferred to 70% ethanol until histological processing. Tumor sections were processed for Hematoxyilin–Eosin staining or immunohistochemistry using antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 1. All the antibodies used in this study were validated by the supplier as well as independent publications from academic laboratories. However, before we use any of the antibodies, we have validated their suitability by titrating the amount of antibody and running positive and negative controls. All antibodies were stained on the Leica Bond RX Automated Stainer with either Epitope Retrieval Buffer 1 (ER1), Epitope Retrieval Buffer 2 (ER2), or with Enzyme 1 (Leica). All antibodies were diluted in Power Vision Super blocker (Leica). The IHC slides were scanned using Aperio ScanScope slide scanner (Aperio Technologies, CA), and the images were analyzed using Positivity Pixel Count 9.0 algorithm within ImageScope software (Aperio Technologies, CA) as described previously75.

Tumor protein isolation

Mice were anaesthetized and euthanized before resection of the tumors. Tumors were cut into small pieces and homogenized in the presence of tissue extraction solution (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA 2 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, 20 mM Na4P2O7, 1 mM beta-glycerophosphate, 1% NP-40). Homogenized tumors were incubated on ice for 30 min. Whole-tumor lysates were clarified by two sequential centrifugations at 13,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Twenty to eighty micrograms of total protein was used for western blot analysis.

Cytokine analysis

Cytokine analysis was carried out on tumor homogenates harvested using tissue extraction buffer. Tumor homogenates with equal amounts of protein concentration were shipped to Eve Technologies (Calgary, Alberta, Canada) for 31-Plex murine cytokine/chemokine analysis.

Antibodies

The immune checkpoint blockade antibodies anti-CTLA-4 (clone 9H10, BioXcell), and anti-PDL-1 (clone 10 F.9G2, BioXcell) were used alone or in combination with HSV-1+Mito-C. For ICI treatments, mice with palpable tumors volume below 100 mm3 were injected with 200 μg of the antibodies every 3 days. In the combination treatments ICI antibodies were applied at the same day as the start of HSV-1 treatment. Treatments were continued until mice reached end point. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD4 (clone GK1.5, BioXcell) and CD8 (Clone 2.43, BioXcell) T cells were administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 250 μg starting 2 days before treatment and applied every other day for the first two weeks and once a week thereafter. Depletion of cells after antibody administration was verified by flow cytometry.

Statistics and reproducibility

BALB-NeuT female mice tumors take a minimum of 110 days to become palpable and the incidence of macroscopic tumors is a stochastic event making larger experiments difficult to be synchronized. As a result, we conducted experiments with less than five mice per treatment group (while including multiple treatment and controls groups) and pooled experimental results collected from multiple independent experiments.

For each statistical analysis used, normality of the distributions and equality of variance assumptions were tested before running the statistical analyses. One-way analysis of variance, non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test and t test were used to determine the statistical significance of the differences in means. For analyzing the statistical significance of the difference in Kaplan–Meier survival between treatments, the Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test was used. All the tests were two-sided. The null hypothesis was rejected for p values <0.05. All data analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA, USA).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The source data behind the graphs in this paper are available in Supplementary Data 1. All other data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Shankaran, V. et al. IFNγ and lymphocytes prevent primary tumour development and shape tumour immunogenicity. Nature 410, 1107–1111 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sanmamed, M. F. & Chen, L. A paradigm shift in cancer immunotherapy: from enhancement to normalization. Cell 175, 313–326 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hodi, F. S. et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 711–723 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wolchok, J. D. et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 122–133 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Antonia, S. J. et al. Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage iii non–small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1919–1929 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Motzer, R. J. et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1803–1813 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Topalian, S. L. et al. Immunotherapy: the path to win the war on cancer? Cell 161, 185–186 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fares C. M., Allen E. M. V., Drake C. G., Allison J. P., Hu-Lieskovan S. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade: why does checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy not work for all patients? American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, 147–164 (2019).

  9. 9.

    Snyder, A. et al. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2189–2199 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Le, D. T. et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2509–2520 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zaretsky, J. M. et al. Mutations associated with acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 819–829 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zemek, R. M. et al. Sensitization to immune checkpoint blockade through activation of a STAT1/NK axis in the tumor microenvironment. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaav7816 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Casares, N. et al. Caspase-dependent immunogenicity of doxorubicin-induced tumor cell death. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1691–1701 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mroz, P., Hashmi, J. T., Huang, Y. Y., Lange, N. & Hamblin, M. R. Stimulation of anti-tumor immunity by photodynamic therapy. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 7, 75–91 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lemay, C. G. et al. Harnessing oncolytic virus-mediated antitumor immunity in an infected cell vaccine. Mol. Ther. 20, 1791–1799 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Errington, F. et al. Inflammatory tumour cell killing by oncolytic reovirus for the treatment of melanoma. Gene Ther. 15, 1257–1270 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Guo, Z. S., Liu, Z. & Bartlett, D. L. Oncolytic immunotherapy: dying the right way is a key to eliciting potent antitumor immunity. Front. Oncol. 4, 74 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Obeid, M. et al. Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death. Nat. Med. 13, 54–61 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Michaud, M. et al. Autophagy-dependent anticancer immune responses induced by chemotherapeutic agents in mice. Science 334, 1573–1577 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yang, H. et al. Contribution of RIP3 and MLKL to immunogenic cell death signaling in cancer chemotherapy. Oncoimmunology 5, e1149673 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yatim, N. et al. RIPK1 and NF-kappaB signaling in dying cells determines cross-priming of CD8(+) T cells. Science 350, 328–334 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ma, Y. et al. Anticancer chemotherapy-induced intratumoral recruitment and differentiation of antigen-presenting cells. Immunity 38, 729–741 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ciampricotti M., Hau C. S., Doornebal C. W., Jonkers J., de Visser K. E. Chemotherapy response of spontaneous mammary tumors is independent of the adaptive immune system. Nat. Med. 18, 344–346 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Ciampricotti, M. et al. Development of metastatic HER2(+) breast cancer is independent of the adaptive immune system. J. Pathol. 224, 56–66 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rovero, S. et al. DNA vaccination against rat her-2/Neu p185 more effectively inhibits carcinogenesis than transplantable carcinomas in transgenic BALB/c mice. J. Immunol. 165, 5133–5142 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rahbar, R. et al. B7-H4 expression by nonhematopoietic cells in the tumor microenvironment promotes antitumor immunity. Cancer Immunol. Res. 3, 184–195 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Workenhe, S. T. et al. Immunogenic HSV mediated oncolysis shapes the antitumor immune response and contributes to therapeutic efficacy. Mol. Ther. 22, 123–131 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chan, T. A., Wolchok, J. D. & Snyder, A. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1984 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Workenhe, S. T., Pol, J. G., Lichty, B., Cummings, D. & Mossman, K. L. Combining oncolytic HSV-1 with immunogenic cell death-inducing drug mitoxantrone breaks cancer immune tolerance and improves therapeutic efficacy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 1, 309–319 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    van Vloten, J. P., Workenhe, S. T., Wootton, S. K., Mossman, K. L. & Bridle, B. W. Critical interactions between immunogenic cancer cell death, oncolytic viruses, and the immune system define the rational design of combination immunotherapies. J. Immunol. 200, 450 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Workenhe, S. T. & Mossman, K. L. Rewiring cancer cell death to enhance oncolytic viro-immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2, e27138 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Workenhe, S. T. & Mossman, K. L. Oncolytic virotherapy and immunogenic cancer cell death: sharpening the sword for improved cancer treatment strategies. Mol. Ther. 22, 251–256 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Workenhe, S. T., Verschoor, M. L. & Mossman, K. L. The role of oncolytic virus immunotherapies to subvert cancer immune evasion. Future Oncol. 11, 675–689 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Takahashi, N. et al. Necrostatin-1 analogues: critical issues on the specificity, activity and in vivo use in experimental disease models. Cell Death Dis. 3, e437–e437 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kepp, O. et al. Consensus guidelines for the detection of immunogenic cell death. Oncoimmunology 3, e955691 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pol, J. G. et al. Maraba virus as a potent oncolytic vaccine vector. Mol. Ther. 22, 420–429 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    DeNardo, D. G. et al. Leukocyte complexity predicts breast cancer survival and functionally regulates response to chemotherapy. Cancer Discov. 1, 54–67 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Forde, P. M. et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 1976–1986 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gandhi, L. et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 2078–2092 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hellmann, M. D. et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 2093–2104 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kroemer, G., Senovilla, L., Galluzzi, L., Andre, F. & Zitvogel, L. Natural and therapy-induced immunosurveillance in breast cancer. Nat. Med 21, 1128–1138 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wang, H. et al. In silico simulation of a clinical trial with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-L1 immunotherapies in metastatic breast cancer using a systems pharmacology model. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190366–190366 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Najafov, A. et al. BRAF and AXL oncogenes drive RIPK3 expression loss in cancer. PLOS Biol. 16, e2005756 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Smyth, M. J., Dunn, G. P. & Schreiber, R. D. Cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting: the roles of immunity in suppressing tumor development and shaping tumor immunogenicity. Adv. Immunol. 90, 1–50 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pfirschke, C. et al. Immunogenic chemotherapy sensitizes tumors to checkpoint blockade therapy. Immunity 44, 343–354 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kroemer, G., Galluzzi, L., Kepp, O. & Zitvogel, L. Immunogenic cell death in cancer therapy. Annu Rev. Immunol. 31, 51–72 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Galluzzi, L. et al. Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression. EMBO J. 34, 856–880 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Spranger, S. & Gajewski, T. F. Impact of oncogenic pathways on evasion of antitumour immune responses. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 139 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Aaes, T. L. et al. Vaccination with necroptotic cancer cells induces efficient anti-tumor immunity. Cell Rep. 15, 274–287 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Snyder, A. G. et al. Intratumoral activation of the necroptotic pathway components RIPK1 and RIPK3 potentiates antitumor immunity. Sci. Immunol. 4, eaaw2004 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Seifert, L. et al. The necrosome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via CXCL1 and Mincle-induced immune suppression. Nature 532, 245–249 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Huang, Z. et al. RIP1/RIP3 binding to HSV-1 ICP6 initiates necroptosis to restrict virus propagation in mice. Cell Host Microbe 17, 229–242 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Yu, X. et al. Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 mediate species-specific modulations of programmed necrosis through the viral ribonucleotide reductase large subunit R1. J. Virol. 90, 1088–1095 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Takahashi, N. et al. Necrostatin-1 analogues: critical issues on the specificity, activity and in vivo use in experimental disease models. Cell Death Dis. 3, e437 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Cho, Y., McQuade, T., Zhang, H., Zhang, J. & Chan, F. K.-M. RIP1-dependent and independent effects of necrostatin-1 in necrosis and T cell activation. PLoS ONE 6, e23209 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Stagg, J. & Allard, B. Immunotherapeutic approaches in triple-negative breast cancer: latest research and clinical prospects. Ther. Adv. Med Oncol. 5, 169–181 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Desmedt, C. et al. Biological processes associated with breast cancer clinical outcome depend on the molecular subtypes. Clin. Cancer Res 14, 5158–5165 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Loi, S. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, breast cancer subtypes and therapeutic efficacy. Oncoimmunology 2, e24720 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Loi, S. et al. Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in node-positive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02-98. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 860–867 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Nanda, R. et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 2460–2467 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Zamarin, D. et al. Localized oncolytic virotherapy overcomes systemic tumor resistance to immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 226ra232 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Saha, D., Martuza, R. L. & Rabkin, S. D. Oncolytic herpes simplex virus immunovirotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint blockade to treat glioblastoma. Immunotherapy 10, 779–786 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Vijayakumar, G., Palese, P. & Goff, P. H. Oncolytic Newcastle disease virus expressing a checkpoint inhibitor as a radioenhancing agent for murine melanoma. EBioMedicine 49, 96–105 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Bourgeois-Daigneault M. C., et al. Neoadjuvant oncolytic virotherapy before surgery sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer to immune checkpoint therapy. Science translational medicine 10, (2018).

  65. 65.

    Samson A., et al. Intravenous delivery of oncolytic reovirus to brain tumor patients immunologically primes for subsequent checkpoint blockade. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaao1641 (2018).

  66. 66.

    Passaro, C. et al. Arming an oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 with a single-chain fragment variable antibody against pd-1 for experimental glioblastoma therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 290–299 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Zhu, Y. et al. Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of a novel oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 2 encoding an antibody against programmed cell death 1. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 15, 201–213 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Rajani, K. et al. Combination therapy with reovirus and anti-pd-1 blockade controls tumor growth through innate and adaptive immune responses. Mol. Ther. 24, 166–174 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Schmid, P. et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2108–2121 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Ribas, A. et al. Oncolytic virotherapy promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration and improves Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Cell 174, 1031–1032 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Yatim, N. et al. RIPK1 and NF-κB signaling in dying cells determines cross-priming of CD8+ T cells. Science 350, 328–334 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Lalaoui, N. & Brumatti, G. Relevance of necroptosis in cancer. Immunol. Cell Biol. 95, 137–145 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Workenhe S. T., Ketela T., Moffat J., Cuddington B. P., Mossman K. L. Genome-wide lentiviral shRNA screen identifies serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 2 as a determinant of oncolytic virus activity in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 35, 2465–2474 (2015).

  74. 74.

    Workenhe, S. T., Pol, J. G., Lichty, B. D., Cummings, D. T. & Mossman, K. L. Combining oncolytic HSV-1 with immunogenic cell death-inducing drug mitoxantrone breaks cancer immune tolerance and improves therapeutic efficacy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 1, 309–319 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Bakhshinyan, D. et al. BMI1 is a therapeutic target in recurrent medulloblastoma. Oncogene 38, 1702–1716 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Derek Cummings for help with establishing the BALB-NeuT colony in our laboratory. We thank Mary Smith and Mary Bruni of John Mayberry Core Histology Facility, McMaster University for immunohistochemistry staining. Funding support is from Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (to K.L.M.), Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (to K.L.M., and the Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Fellowship Program (to S.T.W.).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.T.W., A.N., Y.W., J.L.B, and K.L.M. conceived the study and designed experiments. S.T.W, A.N., A.V, N.E, A.N., D.N.H., J.W., A.O., Kelly L.M., D.N.H. developed the methodologies, conducted the experiments. S.T.W, K.L.M, A.N, A.O., J.A.N, A.G.M. S.K.S, D.B. analyzed and interpreted the experimental results. S.T.W, A.O., Y.W, J.L.B, and K.L.M. wrote and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Samuel T. Workenhe or Karen L. Mossman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Workenhe, S.T., Nguyen, A., Bakhshinyan, D. et al. De novo necroptosis creates an inflammatory environment mediating tumor susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Commun Biol 3, 645 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01362-w

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing