Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Loss of β-cell identity and diabetic phenotype in mice caused by disruption of CNOT3-dependent mRNA deadenylation

Abstract

Pancreatic β-cells are responsible for production and secretion of insulin in response to increasing blood glucose levels. Defects in β-cell function lead to hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus. Here, we show that CNOT3, a CCR4–NOT deadenylase complex subunit, is dysregulated in islets in diabetic db/db mice, and that it is essential for murine β cell maturation and identity. Mice with β cell-specific Cnot3 deletion (Cnot3βKO) exhibit impaired glucose tolerance, decreased β cell mass, and they gradually develop diabetes. Cnot3βKO islets display decreased expression of key regulators of β cell maturation and function. Moreover, they show an increase of progenitor cell markers, β cell-disallowed genes, and genes relevant to altered β cell function. Cnot3βKO islets exhibit altered deadenylation and increased mRNA stability, partly accounting for the increased expression of those genes. Together, these data reveal that CNOT3-mediated mRNA deadenylation and decay constitute previously unsuspected post-transcriptional mechanisms essential for β cell identity.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that is ultimately caused by the loss of functional pancreatic β cells1. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) involves immune-mediated β-cell destruction1, but dedifferentiation and dysfunction, rather than β-cell loss per se, are implicated in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D)2. A fuller understanding of molecular mechanisms that govern β-cell differentiation, maturation, and dedifferentiation in T2D will likely prove crucial for developing novel prevention and treatment strategies.

Pancreatic β cells are functionally defined by their capacity for insulin secretion, stimulated by glucose and other nutrients3. Underlying this unique function is a molecular identity defined by expression of genes that drive β-cell maturation, insulin gene expression, insulin granule formation, and exocytosis. Although extensive research has focused on transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of β-cell maturation and function, whether and how post-transcriptional mechanisms influence β-cell gene expression program have been little explored. Nonetheless, from pre-existing mRNAs, glucose stimulates biosynthesis of insulin and other β-cell proteins, particularly those involved in insulin granule biogenesis4. Furthermore, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and micro-RNAs (miRNAs) act as important modulators of pancreatic β-cell gene expression and function5,6,7.

Most eukaryotic mRNAs are polyadenylated at the 3′ end, and poly(A) tail lengths are important for post-transcriptional gene regulation8. Importantly, mRNA deadenylation is the rate-limiting step in mRNA decay9. Deadenylation shortens poly(A) tail lengths, reducing the binding of cytoplasmic polyadenosine-binding protein 1. This decreases mRNA stability, slowing translation8. The CCR4–NOT complex constitutes the major deadenylase complex in eukaryotes10,11. CCR4–NOT is a multimeric complex containing two catalytic subunits with deadenylase activity (CNOT6 or CNOT6L, and CNOT7 or CNOT8) and six non-catalytic subunits (CNOT1, CNOT2, CNOT3, CNOT9, CNOT10, and CNOT11)11. Although the exact functions of the non-catalytic subunits remain elusive, they may regulate stability and activity of the catalytic subunits and may participate in recruitment of the CCR4–NOT complex to specific target mRNAs12. Two targeting mechanisms have been proposed to ensure specificity. First, sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) bring the CCR4–NOT complex to sequence elements in the 3′ untranslated region of the target mRNA, and second, the miRNA machinery recruits the CCR4–NOT complex to its target mRNA13,14,15. Earlier studies have revealed the involvement of the CCR4–NOT complex in development of metabolic disorders such as obesity, diabetes, and lipodystrophy;16,17,18 however, its role in maintaining normal β-cell function has not been investigated.

In this study, we examined whether and how mRNA deadenylation regulates β-cell function by analyzing the physiological role of the CCR4–NOT complex in pancreatic β cells. We focused on the CNOT3 subunit and we present evidence that CNOT3-dependent deadenylation is pivotal for normal β-cell function. We show that β-cell-specific knockout (KO) of Cnot3 results in impaired glucose tolerance and ultimately the development of overt diabetes. This might be attributable to a lack of β-cell identity. Our data suggest that the observed β-cell dysfunction can be partly explained by a loss of CNOT3-dependent control of the decay of Aldob, Slc5a10, Wnt5b, and several other mRNAs that are normally suppressed in β cells19,20,21. Thus, we propose that CNOT3 is involved in degrading mRNAs from these genes to maintain normal β-cell function. Our findings show that the CCR4–NOT complex is deregulated in pancreatic islets in diabetes, thus suggesting that the CCR4–NOT complex serves as a therapeutic target to treat diabetes.

Results

CNOT3 decreases in diabetic and gluco/lipo-toxic conditions

We first asked whether CCR4–NOT complex subunit expression is altered in the diabetic state. Accordingly, we isolated islets from db/db mice, which lack the leptin receptor and develop severe obesity associated with diabetes22. Immunoblot analysis revealed a decrease in CCR4–NOT complex subunits, CNOT1, CNOT2, and CNOT3 (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a, 2a) in diabetic islets. Among these subunits, CNOT3 consistently showed a marginally significant decrease in all samples examined (Supplementary Fig. 1a and 2a). Since CNOT3 is an important subunit of the CCR4–NOT complex17, these data suggest impaired CCR4–NOT complex function in diabetic islets. To investigate whether CCR4–NOT is a possible early effector in the pathogenesis of diabetes, we examined CCR4–NOT complex subunit expression in the prediabetic state using 20-week-old mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for 3 months. We observed a significant increase of CNOT8 (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1b, 2b). In order to determine whether these effects on CCR4–NOT complex subunits were the result of gluco/lipotoxicity, we analyzed CCR4–NOT subunit expression in MIN6 cells after chronic exposure (1 week) to high glucose (50 mM), with or without palmitic acid (500 µM). CNOT3 significantly decreased with high glucose and palmitic acid treatments (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 1c, 2c). CNOT8 increased with palmitic acid treatment in all samples examined, although the extent of the increase varied among samples (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 1c, 2c).

Fig. 1: CCR4–NOT complex subunits are deregulated in mouse models of diabetes and obesity.
figure1

ac Immunoblot analysis of CCR4–NOT complex subunits in: a islet lysates from 16-week-old +/db control and db/db mice. b islet lysates from 20-week-old mice fed a normal diet (ND) or a high-fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks. c MIN6 cells under low/high-glucose conditions (LG/HG) with or without palmitic acid (PA) treatment. Each blot is a representative of three different blots.

Impaired insulin secretion in Cnot3βKO mice

In light of the above findings, we next investigated roles of the CCR4–NOT complex in pancreatic β cells. We generated a mouse model lacking the Cnot3 gene in β cells (Cnot3βKO mice). Successful suppression of CNOT3 in β cells was confirmed by immunoblot analysis and immunohistochemistry (Fig. 2a, b). Immunohistochemistry revealed CNOT3 suppression in centrally located β cells, while other islet cells located peripherally retained CNOT3 expression in Cnot3βKO islets. In mice, β cells make up the core of the islets23, suggesting that CNOT3-expressing cells in Cnot3βKO islets are non-β cells. Indeed, cells that did not undergo Cre-mediated recombination, expressed glucagon (GLUC), somatostatin (SST), and pancreatic polypeptide (PPT), but not insulin, as shown in Fig. 3g. Consistent with CNOT3 suppression in other tissues24,25,26, the abundance of other complex subunits, such as CNOT1 and CNOT2, decreased in Cnot3βKO islets (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). Moreover, bulk poly(A) tail analysis showed that the population of mRNAs with poly(A) tail lengths longer than 50 nucleotides increased in Cnot3βKO islets, compared with controls (Fig. 2c, d), indicating impairment of deadenylase activity.

Fig. 2: The loss of CNOT3 in β cells impairs glucose tolerance and causes diabetes.
figure2

a Immunoblot analysis of CNOT3 in islet lysates from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice. This blot is a representative of three different blots. b Immunofluorescence of CNOT3 (green) in islets from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). A scale bar represents 50 µm. c Poly(A) tail lengths of global mRNAs by bulk poly (A) assay in control and Cnot3βKO islets (n = 1, each sample was pooled from four mice). d Densitograms of poly(A) tail lengths shown in (c). Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests in: e 4- and f 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice (n = 6–9). g Fasting blood glucose in 12-week-old control (n = 5) and Cnot3βKO mice (n = 4). h Body weight comparisons between control and Cnot3βKO mice at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of age (n = 6). i Blood glucose in 8-week-old control (n = 6) and Cnot3βKO (n = 13) mice fed with ND. j Serum insulin in 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice after 16 h fasting (0 min) and 15 min after glucose injection (2 g/kg body weight) (n = 4). k Insulin released by islets from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice in response to low 3 mM glucose (3G) and high 17 mM glucose (17G) stimulation for 1 h. This experiment is a representative of three independent experiments using three different biological replicates (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t test. l Cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+] cyt) responses in control (n = 20) and Cnot3βKO (n = 18) islets from three 8-week-old mice from each genotype in response to low (3G), high (17G) glucose or 20 mM KCl. m AUC of glucose-evoked Ca2+ traces. AUC was calculated using different baseline values for each group (0.95 for control and 1.03 for Cnot3βKO). n AUC of depolarizing stimulus, KCl, response. AUC was calculated using different baseline values for each group (1.15 for control and 0.95 for Cnot3βKO). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Mann–Whitney test.

Fig. 3: The lack of CNOT3 in β cells reduces insulin expression.
figure3

a qPCR analysis of insulin mRNA isoforms (Ins1 and Ins2), normalized to the Gapdh mRNA level, in control and Cnot3βKO islets (n = 7). b Co-immunofluorescence staining of EGFP (green), insulin (magenta) and DAPI (blue) in pancreatic sections from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice. A scale bar represents 25 µm. Representative results from three 8-week-old mice from each genotype are shown. c Quantification data of immunofluorescence analysis presented in Fig. 3b. Each data point represents %EGFP+ in Insulin+ β cells in control and Cnot3βKO islets (n = 12) from three 8-week-old mice from each genotype. d Insulin content of islets from 8-week-old control (n = 4) and Cnot3βKO (n = 5) mice. e β-cell mass measurement in pancreatic sections from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice (n = 4). f Islet number per pancreas area in pancreatic sections from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice (n = 4). g Co-immunofluorescence staining of EGFP (green), insulin (magenta), GLUC (blue), SST (blue) and PPT (blue) in pancreatic sections from 8-week-old mTmG reporter: “control (Cnot3+,+; +/Ins1-Cre) and Cnot3βKO” mice. A scale bar represents 25 µm. h Co-immunofluorescence staining of EGFP (green), insulin (magenta) and SYP (blue) in pancreatic sections from 8-week-old mTmG reporter: “control (Cnot3+,+; +/Ins1-Cre) and Cnot3βKO” mice. A scale bar represents 25 µm. Representative results from three 8-week-old mice from each genotype are shown. il Transmission electron microscopy performed on islets isolated from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice (n = 3), including quantification of j vesicle density, k vesicle diameter and l the percentage of mature (black bar) and immature vesicles (white bar). A scale bar represents 1 µm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t test.

To determine whether CNOT3 depletion affects β-cell function, we conducted glucose tolerance tests (GTT) on control and Cnot3βKO mice. We used 4- and 8-week-old mice. Four-week-old Cnot3βKO mice showed glucose tolerance and fasting blood glucose levels comparable to those of control mice (Fig. 2e). While fasting blood glucose levels were still similar between 8-week-old controls and Cnot3βKO mice, Cnot3βKO mice showed impaired glucose tolerance (Fig. 2f). By the time Cnot3βKO mice reached 12 weeks of age, they had developed overt diabetes, as indicated by significant elevation of fasting blood glucose levels (Fig. 2g). With development of overt diabetes, 12-week-old Cnot3βKO mice displayed general deterioration of health and clinical signs of diabetes, including polyuria, polydipsia, and weight loss (Fig. 2h). These results suggest that metabolic impairment worsened with age, supporting progressive loss of β-cell function in Cnot3βKO mice. Indeed, blood glucose levels in 8-week-old Cnot3βKO mice were significantly elevated above those of control mice under normal feeding conditions (Fig. 2i). Furthermore, we measured fasting serum insulin levels and serum insulin levels after glucose administration in 8-week-old mice. There was no significant difference in fasting serum insulin levels between Cnot3βKO mice and controls. However, Cnot3βKO mice had significantly lower serum insulin levels 15 min after glucose administration, compared with controls (Fig. 2j). To evaluate β-cell function, we performed a glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) assay on islets isolated from 8-week-old Cnot3βKO mice and controls. Cnot3βKO islets displayed normal basal insulin secretion at 3 mM glucose, but significantly decreased insulin secretion upon stimulation with high (17 mM) glucose, compared with control islets (Fig. 2k). This provides evidence for functional impairment of Cnot3βKO islets. Results of this ex vivo assay also agree with observed normal fasting serum insulin levels in Cnot3βKO mice and decreased serum insulin after in vivo glucose stimulation (Fig. 2j). Correspondingly, Cnot3βKO islets displayed defective glucose-stimulated cytosolic Ca2+ dynamics, with a markedly more rapid return of cytosolic Ca2+ to pre-stimulatory levels in Cnot3βKO than in control islets (Fig. 2l, m). In contrast, the fluorescent response of Cnot3βKO islets to depolarization with KCl was marginally augmented from that of control islets, consistent with the idea that observed β-cell dysfunction is largely due to defects in glucose metabolism (Fig. 2n). Intercellular β–β cell connectivity, adopting the Pearson correlation (R) analysis27 was not altered by Cnot3 deletion, when perfused with either high glucose (17 mM) or KCl. Nevertheless, at low (3 mM) glucose, the number of possible β cell–β cell connections decreased in Cnot3βKO compared with control islets (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). No differences in connectivity strength between groups were observed in response to high glucose or KCl (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d).

Evaluation of 8-week-old Cnot3βKO mouse islet morphology with H&E staining revealed pale nuclear staining with many islets showing abnormal shapes. At 12 weeks of age, almost all Cnot3βKO islets displayed abnormal shapes and neovascularization. At 20 weeks of age, Cnot3βKO islets had reduced numbers of cells in individual islets in a manner similar to that observed in diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats28 (Supplementary Fig. 4e).

Reduced number of insulin-producing cells in Cnot3βKO mice

β-cell-specific depletion of Cnot3 led to a significant reduction in expression of murine insulin gene isoforms (Ins1 and Ins2) (Fig. 3a). In order to trace Cnot3 depletion in β cells, we used Ins1-Cre mTmG reporter mice, in which successfully recombined cells show green fluorescence from expression of membrane-targeted EGFP (mG), whereas unrecombined cells show red fluorescence of membrane-targeted tdTomato (mT). Paraformaldehyde (PFA) fixation masks mTmG fluorescence, so in order to trace successfully recombined cells we performed immunofluorescence staining of EGFP. Immunofluorescence staining of insulin and EGFP in control mice expressing Cre recombinase (Control; +/Ins1-Cre) revealed successful labeling of β cells with EGFP. Many EGFP-stained cells were insulin-negative, revealing a loss of insulin expression in many β cells in Cnot3βKO islets (Fig. 3b, c). This was associated with a significant reduction in insulin content in Cnot3βKO islets compared with control islets (Fig. 3d). β-cell mass was reduced in Cnot3βKO mice by nearly 50% (Fig. 3e). This was associated with smaller islets, but not with a significant difference in islet number in Cnot3βKO mice, compared with control mice (Fig. 3f). These findings prompted us to determine whether decreased pancreatic insulin content and reduced β-cell mass were driven by increased β-cell death. We examined β-cell apoptosis by TUNEL assay. Cnot3βKO islets did not show extensive TUNEL staining compared with control islets (Supplementary Fig. 5).

In 8-week-old Cnot3βKO islets, many EGFP-stained cells that were insulin-negative did not stain with anti-GLUC, anti-SST, or anti-PPT antibodies, indicating that β cells did not transform into other types of islet cells (Fig. 3g). Furthermore, EGFP-stained cells in Cnot3βKO islets stained for the pan-endocrine marker, synaptophysin (SYP), indicating that these hormone-negative cells are viable and retain their endocrine phenotype (Fig. 3h).

We further examined Cnot3βKO islets using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to detect any ultrastructural alterations in β cells. Control islets possessed β cells with typical insulin granules, manifesting characteristic electron-dense crystal cores, and with β cell–β cell contacts displaying tight junctions essential for normal insulin secretion29. In contrast, β cells from Cnot3βKO islets were rather heterogeneous in appearance, with few having typical insulin granules (Fig. 3i). Many were degranulated with few, or abnormally small, insulin granules (Fig. 3j, l). Also observed in Cnot3βKO islets were β cells with atypical rod-shaped insulin granules, or with irregular plasma membranes (Fig. 3i). We did not observe a significant difference in numbers of mitochondria in control and Cnot3βKO islets (Supplementary Fig. 6). The above findings suggest that diabetes in Cnot3βKO mice is caused by both lack of β-cell identity, and possibly by failure to achieve a fully differentiated state.

CNOT3 is essential for β-cell maturation and identity

Considering the above observations, we performed quantitative PCR (qPCR) to measure expression of dedifferentiation/progenitor cell markers. We observed significant upregulation of β-cell dedifferentiation/progenitor cell markers, including Ngn3, Aldh1a3, Myt1, Dcx, and Tnfrsf11b mRNAs (Fig. 4a). ALDH1A3 was recently recognized as a marker of β-cell dedifferentiation in diabetes30,31. Immunoblot analysis of ALDH1A3 revealed its significant upregulation in islets isolated from Cnot3βKO mice, compared with control islets (Fig. 4b, c, Supplementary Fig. 7). This suggests that β cells in Cnot3βKO mice exhibit a progenitor-like state.

Fig. 4: CNOT3 is essential for β-cell maturation and identity.
figure4

a qPCR analysis of progenitor cells/dedifferentiation markers, normalized to the Gapdh mRNA level, in control and Cnot3βKO islets (n = 4–6). b Immunoblot analysis of ALDH1A3 in islet lysates from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice. This blot is a representative of three different blots. c Band quantification of an immunoblot of ALDH1A3 (n = 3) in Fig. 4b. d qPCR analysis of β-cell-specific functional mRNAs expression categorized as β-cell-specific transcription factors, glycolytic pathway, insulin granule maturation, and insulin secretion mRNAs, normalized to the Gapdh mRNA level, in control and Cnot3βKO islets (n = 3–7). e Co-immunofluorescence staining of MAFA (green), GLUT2 (green), and insulin (magenta) in pancreatic sections from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice. A scale bar represents 25 µm. Representative results from four 8-week-old mice from each genotype are shown. f qPCR analysis of immature β-cell markers, normalized to the Gapdh mRNA level, in control and Cnot3βKO islets (n = 5–7). g Immunoblot analysis of MCT1 and LDHA in islet lysates from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice. This blot is a representative of three different blots. h Band quantification of immunoblot of MCT1 and LDHA (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t test.

In addition, we checked expression of a number of genes critical for β-cell function. Among mRNAs encoding the transcription factors important for β-cell function and insulin transcription that we tested (Mafa, Nkx2.2, Nkx6.1, Neurod1 and Pdx1), only Mafa mRNA was significantly reduced (Fig. 4d). Mafa, is a key β-cell transcription factor and a driver of β-cell maturation32 that was sharply reduced at the protein level as well (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. 8a). Consistent with decreased GSIS, mass spectrometry (MS) analysis revealed significant reductions in proteins involved in glucose sensing, insulin secretory granule formation, and insulin secretion (Table 1). Some affected proteins manifest no change in mRNA levels, while others were reduced, but not significantly (Fig. 4d). We observed decreased expression of glucose transporter-2 (GLUT2), in Cnot3βKO pancreata (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. 8b). GLUT2, encoded by the Slc2a2 gene, is a transmembrane protein involved in glucose uptake by β cells, the first step of GSIS. In support of defective maturation of CNOT3-depleted β cells, we found that urocortin 3 (Ucn3), a marker of β-cell maturation, which is also important in GSIS33, was unchanged at the mRNA level, but was strongly decreased at the protein level (Fig. 4d, Table 1). Moreover, Cnot3βKO mice displayed a post-transcriptional defect in insulin biosynthesis where Cnot3βKO islets displayed significantly decreased expression of mRNAs encoding proteins involved in insulin biosynthesis, such as T2D-associated zinc transporter Slc30a8, proinsulin-to-insulin convertase (Pcsk2), and carboxypeptidase (Cpe)34,35 (Fig. 4d and Table 1). These proteins have established roles in insulin processing and/or maturation of insulin secretory granules; thus, these data reveal loss of β-cell maturation markers and defects in insulin biosynthesis.

Table 1 Categories of proteins affected by Cnot3 KO in β cells obtained from MS analysis of Cnot3βKO islets.

In normal mature β cells, insulin secretion is regulated by coupling glucose metabolism to insulin secretion36. Multiple genes involved in glycolysis are upregulated in diabetes and interfere with normal insulin secretion37. This prompted us to investigate glycolytic enzyme mRNAs (Ldha, Hk1, and Hk2) with other mRNAs that are normally repressed in mature β cells (Slc16a1/Mct1, Rest and Pdgfra). Loss of their repression may result in impaired β-cell function38. We observed significant upregulation of Slc16a1, Ldha, and Hk2 mRNAs that belong to the so-called β-cell-disallowed genes. Hk1, Rest, and Pdgfra mRNAs were upregulated, but the increases were not statistically significant (Fig. 4f). We confirmed the upregulation of MCT1, LDHA, and HK1 at the protein level as well (Fig. 4g, h, Supplementary Fig. 9, Table 1). These data support a metabolic phenotype resembling that of immature/fetal β cells.

Transcriptome- and proteome-wide changes in Cnot3βKO islets

To understand how loss of Cnot3 affects global gene expression in β cells, we performed massive parallel RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of control and Cnot3βKO islets. Comparison of gene expression profiles between control and Cnot3βKO islets revealed 3847 differentially expressed (DE) genes (adjusted P < 0.05), of which 2234 genes were upregulated and 1613 genes were downregulated (Fig. 5a). To define the biological processes affected by Cnot3 depletion, we performed gene ontology (GO) analysis of DE genes using the DAVID gene annotation tool (Fig. 5b). Consistent with the diabetic phenotype, GO analysis showed that genes upregulated after Cnot3 depletion are highly enriched for those involved in “immune system process”, “lipid metabolic processes”, and “oxidation/reduction processes”, while downregulated genes are highly enriched for those involved in “regulation of insulin secretion” and “vesicle mediated transport.” To gain more insight into the effect of Cnot3 depletion on the pattern of gene expression in β cells, we applied a stricter threshold by comparing the number of significantly upregulated to downregulated genes that were DE by more than twofold. Consistent with the molecular function of CNOT3 as a positive modulator of CCR4–NOT-mediated mRNA decay, most genes that exhibited more than twofold differential expression were upregulated (Fig. 5c). We next examined whether changes in Cnot3βKO islet transcriptomes are reflected in the corresponding proteomes. We compared transcriptomic with proteomic data from Cnot3βKO islets. There was a significant strong correlation between DE genes and proteins in Cnot3βKO islets (R2 = 0.64, P < 2.2e−16), suggesting that most changes in the transcriptome are mirrored in the proteome (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 5: Global gene expression changes in Cnot3βKO islets.
figure5

a 3847 genes were differentially expressed (DE) in islets following CNOT3 depletion in β cells. The graph indicates the percentage distribution of genes differentially expressed (P < 0.05) in Cnot3βKO compared with control islets (n = 3, each sample was pooled from two mice). Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot is presented in Supplementary Fig. 10. b GO analysis of mRNAs significantly upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) in Cnot3βKO islets. Bar charts of GO terms (Biological Process) ranked by FDR (<0.05) are shown. Gene lists included in each GO term are summarized in Supplementary Data 1. c Volcano plot of DE genes indicating the percentage distribution of DE (P < 0.05) genes by more than twofold upregulation (red) or downregulation (blue). d Pearson correlation analysis between differentially expressed genes and proteins identified by RNA-seq analysis and MS analysis of control and Cnot3βKO islets. e Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly upregulated (red) and stabilized (green) mRNAs in Cnot3βKO compared with control islets. f qPCR analysis of three top upregulated and stabilized mRNAs (Aldob, Slc5a10 and Wnt5b), normalized to the Gapdh mRNA level, in control and Cnot3βKO islets (n = 3–6). g Immunoblot analysis of ALDOB in islet lysates from 8-week-old control and Cnot3βKO mice (n = 3). This blot is a representative of three different blots. h Band quantification of immunoblot of ALDOB (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t test.

Steady-state mRNA abundance is mainly determined by rates of RNA transcription and decay39. We used transcriptomic data to infer mRNA stability in Cnot3βKO islets. While exonic read counts in RNA-seq data correspond to steady-state mRNA abundance, changes in abundance of intronic reads can be used to estimate changes in transcription rate. We used this approach to infer global mRNA stability from RNA-seq data. We estimated the change in mRNA half-life as the difference of the logarithm of the fold change in exonic reads and the logarithm of the fold change in intronic reads (∆exon–∆intron)40. Because CNOT3 is involved in mRNA deadenylation and subsequent mRNA decay, we considered a transcript to be a target of CNOT3 if that transcript was upregulated and stabilized, as inferred from RNA-seq data. We found that 80% of mRNAs (254 of 317) that show increased ∆exon–∆intron in Cnot3βKO compared with control islets were among the significantly upregulated mRNAs, suggesting that post-transcriptional mechanisms, including mRNA stabilization, effectively contributed to an increase of mRNAs in Cnot3βKO islets. In contrast, decreased intron reads in Cnot3βKO islets were not relevant to any significant increase of 63 mRNAs, despite increased ∆exon–∆intron (Fig. 5e). We compared upregulated, stabilized mRNAs in Cnot3βKO islets to published RNA-seq data from db/db islets41 and found 73 upregulated, stabilized mRNAs to be upregulated in db/db islets, suggesting that CNOT3 is involved in suppressing diabetes-related genes (Supplementary Table 1). Interestingly, transcriptome analysis revealed Aldob to be the most upregulated (almost 1000-fold) stabilized mRNA. ALDOB is a glycolytic enzyme that is normally silenced in mature β cells42,43. It was dramatically upregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 5f–h, Supplementary Fig. 11a). This dramatic upregulation of Aldob mRNA is also possibly due to its increased transcription, as inferred from its increased pre-mRNA levels (Supplementary Fig. 11b). In addition, the fructose/glucose transporter, Slc5a10, and Wnt5b were among the most stabilized mRNAs, and they were upregulated (Fig. 5f).

Increase of β cell-disallowed genes in Cnot3βKO islets

β cell-disallowed genes are a group of genes that are normally abundantly expressed in most tissues, but selectively repressed in β cells21,44. Two previous studies identified 68 of such genes using microarray analysis45,46. More recently, a novel study identified a new list of β-cell-disallowed genes, based on RNA-seq data of islets, β cells, and α cells19. We performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of 61 β-cell-disallowed genes identified by the latter study, which revealed enrichment of these β-cell-disallowed genes in our transcriptome dataset (Fig. 6a, b).

Fig. 6: Derepression of β cell-disallowed genes and their mRNA stabilization in Cnot3βKO islets.
figure6

a GSEA of β-cell-disallowed genes, identified in Pullen et al.19, in Cnot3βKO islets. b Heatmap of 30 disallowed genes showing mRNA expression obtained from RNA-seq analysis of control and Cnot3βKO islets. c Decay curves of the indicated mRNAs. Total RNA was prepared from control and Cnot3βKO islets treated with Act D for 0, 4, or 8 h. Relative mRNA levels were determined by qPCR and normalized to the Gapdh mRNA level. mRNA levels without Act D treatment (0 h) were set to 100% (n = 3). d RIP-qPCR in MIN6 cells using normal anti-mouse and anti-CNOT3 antibodies revealing the interaction of CNOT3 with the indicated mRNAs that adversely affect β cell function (n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t test.

We inferred the mRNA stability of some of these disallowed genes together with Aldob, Slc5a10, and Wnt5b from transcriptome analysis (Fig. 5e). Some mRNAs were filtered out in the statistical analysis, due to the low expression values that hindered assessment of their stability. We validated this stability analysis by treatment of control and Cnot3βKO islets with Act D and determined their relative abundances at 4-h intervals. Aldob, Wnt5b, Cat, and Abtb2 mRNAs were significantly stabilized (Fig. 6c). On the other hand, other upregulated mRNAs: Hk1, Rest, and Yap1 were not stabilized, indicating that some mRNAs increased independent of mRNA stabilization (Fig. 6c). We could not assess the stability of Slc5a10, Slc16a1, Ldha, and Pdgfra experimentally. Yet, based on statistical evaluation of exon and intron counts, we found that among these mRNAs, Slc5a10 (logFC = 4.76, FDR = 1.7e−17) was stabilized.

To exclude the possibility that the observed immature phenotype is merely caused by hyperglycemia, we performed experiments on euglycemic 4-week-old Cnot3βKO mice. We observed significant downregulation of Mafa, Ins1, and Ins2 mRNAs, and significant upregulation of Aldob, Slc5a10, Wnt5b, Hk1, and Tnfrsf11b mRNAs, suggesting that the molecular defect results directly from the loss of Cnot3, rather than to hyperglycemia (Supplementary Fig. 12).

To further understand the mechanism by which CNOT3 alters mRNA stability, we asked whether affected genes interact with CNOT3. To answer this question, we carried out RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) using MIN6 cell line lysates with an antibody specific for CNOT3 and negative control immunoglobulin G (IgG). RNA from total extracts (Input), IgG, and CNOT3-immunoprecipitated samples were analyzed by qPCR. Among β cell-disallowed genes analyzed, Slc16a1, Ldha, Cat, Abtb2, Fgf1, Igfbp4, Acot7, and Cxcl12 mRNAs were significantly enriched in CNOT3-immunoprecipitated samples, compared with IgG immunoprecipitated samples (Fig. 6d). These data suggest that the above genes interact with CNOT3. Interestingly, Yap1 is a β cell-disallowed gene that did not interact with CNOT3 (Fig. 6d) and its mRNA decay rate was not affected in Cnot3βKO mice (Fig. 6c). This observation implies that Yap1 upregulation after Cnot3 deletion is an indirect effect (possibly on transcription) rather than a result of reduced decay. In summary, our data suggest that Cnot3 depletion resulted in decreased mRNA decay rates and increased protein synthesis of target transcripts.

Discussion

The loss of β-cell identity and dedifferentiation are increasingly recognized as contributors to impaired β-cell function in T2D2. β-cell maturation involves increased expression of β-cell-specific genes as well as repression of genes that would interfere with normal β-cell function, so-called β-cell “disallowed” genes3,45,46,47. Involvement of post-transcriptional control in regulation of those genes will provide novel insights into β-cell functional maturation and pathogenesis of diabetes. Our findings suggested that CCR4–NOT complex-dependent mRNA deadenylation is crucial for regulation of β-cell-specific genes and disallowed genes, and consequently for β-cell maturation (Fig. 7). Consistent with this, a disruption of the CCR4–NOT complex might be pathogenic in diabetes.

Fig. 7: A schematic model of role of CCR4–NOT complex-mediated deadenylation in β-cell maturation.
figure7

CNOT3, one key subunit of the CCR4–NOT complex, is required for proper function of the CCR4–NOT complex. CNOT3 (Green oval) regulates expression of some β-cell-disallowed/immature genes, possibly through CCR4–NOT complex-mediated mRNA decay. Therefore, Cnot3 KO in β cells impairs β-cell maturation due to failure to repress β-cell-disallowed/immature genes.

The process of GSIS in mature β cells is regulated primarily by levels of extracellular glucose. Unlike immature β cells, which secrete insulin under low-glucose conditions, mature β cells secrete insulin in response to increases in blood glucose, thus maintaining normal glucose homeostasis without causing hypoglycemia42. Here, we show that both GSIS and glucose-stimulated cytosolic Ca2+ dynamics were impaired in Cnot3βKO mice, suggesting impaired glucose metabolism. Impaired glucose metabolism could be due to decreased GLUT2 expression and defects in maturity. Expression of glycolytic genes, such as Hk1, Hk2, and Ldha, is sharply downregulated during β-cell maturation42,48. We observed increased expression of these glycolytic genes and other markers of immature β cells (Slc16a1, Rest, and Pdgfra). Ectopic expression of Hk1, Slc16a1, and Ldha reportedly impairs glucose metabolism and GSIS38,49,50. Moreover, decreased expression of Pdgfra during maturation results in decreased proliferation of mature β cells, necessary for normal GSIS51.

β-cell-disallowed genes are selectively silenced in functional β cells. Their repression, which ensures normal GSIS44, is an element of β-cell identity, acquired during postnatal maturation. The molecular mechanisms involved in repressing these genes are largely unknown; thus, it is currently unclear whether there is a single silencing mechanism for all disallowed genes, or whether several molecular mechanisms are involved. Previous report suggested that epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation are involved in repressing several disallowed genes (Pdgfra, Acot7, Igfbp4 and Fgf1)43. Significantly, DNA methylation is generally essential for β-cell maturation and contributes to repression of immature genes, including Aldob, Hk1, Hk2, and Ldha42. Histone methylation may also be involved where trimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27me3), was found in the promoter regions of Slc16a1, Cxcl12, Acot7, Nfib, Mgst1, and Maf44,52. Importantly, miRNAs downregulate Slc16a1, Acot7, Fcgrt, Igfbp4, Maf, Oat, and Pdgfra, implicating post-transcriptional mechanisms in regulation of disallowed genes7,53,54. The CCR4–NOT complex uses miRNAs to recognize target mRNAs13,14. It is conceivable that the CCR4–NOT complex is involved in miRNA-dependent regulation of β-cell-disallowed genes.

Nearly all processed eukaryotic mRNAs possess poly (A) tails at their 3′ ends. Generally, mRNAs with longer poly (A) tails are more stable than mRNAs with shorter poly (A) tails8. Suppression of any CCR4–NOT complex subunit in tissues results in stabilization of its target mRNAs, due to elongated poly (A) tails24,25,55. In our study, insufficient deadenylation observed in Cnot3βKO islets (Fig. 2c, d), is coincident with upregulation and stabilization of mRNAs, including Aldob, Slc5a10, and Wnt5b (Fig. 5f). Increased expression of Aldob and Slc5a10 is associated with decreased insulin secretion37,56, suggesting their contribution to impaired GSIS. Importantly, upregulation of Aldob, Slc5a10, and Wnt5b mRNAs is correlated with diabetes37,56,57,58. These results agree with our previous findings that the CCR4–NOT complex is involved in regulation of energy metabolism genes15,16,17,18. This study provides evidence that the CCR4–NOT complex is involved in repressing Aldob, Slc5a10, Wnt5b, and several disallowed genes through both direct and indirect mechanisms. We showed that Cnot3 KO results in upregulation and increased stability of Aldob, Slc5a10, Wnt5b, Cat, and Abtb2 mRNAs (Fig. 6c). The finding that CNOT3 directly interacts with Wnt5b, Cat, and Abtb2 mRNAs (Fig. 6d) suggests direct repression of these genes by the CCR4–NOT complex.

On the other hand, suppression of CNOT3 is likely to have indirect effects on gene expression partly through expression changes in key transcription factors. We and others have recently reported that Mafa, Pax6, Rfx6, and Nkx2.2 act as repressors of several disallowed genes, and changes in any of these factors may be involved in upregulation of disallowed genes32,59,60,61. Among these repressors, Mafa was significantly decreased in Cnot3βKO islets (Fig. 4d, e). Therefore, it is possible that decreased Mafa in Cnot3βKO islets contributes to increased expression of disallowed genes. Downregulation of Mafa could also explain upregulation of endocrine progenitor cell markers observed in Cnot3βKO. Upregulation of these progenitor markers, as a result of Mafa downregulation, indicates a failure to attain a fully differentiated state in β cells and upregulates β-cell-disallowed genes32. Indeed, Slc16a1 was upregulated, but not stabilized. Thus, we propose that Slc16a1 is upregulated indirectly by CNOT3 through Mafa repression. This agrees with its upregulation observed in dedifferentiated β cells of Mafa KO mice32. The Mafa suppression mechanism was not determined in this study. Taken together, our data and those of others suggest that repression of disallowed genes is achieved by multiple mechanisms.

Our findings raise the possibility that disruption of the CCR4–NOT complex could be involved in the loss of β-cell identity in diabetes, possibly through de-repression of β-cell immature and disallowed genes. We observed decreased expression of CNOT3 in db/db mice islets. Moreover, glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity significantly reduced CNOT3 levels in MIN6 cells. This agrees with proteomic analysis of human islets that revealed significant reduction of CNOT3 during high-glucose treatment62. In addition, enrichment of immune-related mRNAs among the upregulated mRNAs in Cnot3βKO islets suggests an involvement of enhanced immune response in impaired β cells. It should be noted that enhanced immune response is observed in mouse tissues lacking CCR4–NOT complex function, such as liver and adipose tissues16,18,55,63. In our model, we cannot determine whether the increased immune response in Cnot3βKO mice is a cause or a consequence of β-cell dysfunction. Nevertheless, our findings suggest possible relationship between CCR4–NOT complex dysfunction and diabetes (both T1D and T2D). This requires further study including participation of human diabetes patients.

Several lines of evidence have shown that the loss of CCR4–NOT complex subunits results in serious abnormalities in embryonic development and tissue function10. Importantly, the CCR4–NOT complex contributes to maintenance of both pluripotency of embryonic stem cells and tissue function/identity via mRNA deadenylation. The CCR4–NOT complex promotes the decay of mRNAs that are relevant to immature tissue state, cell death, and proliferation to ensure differentiation or normal tissue development16,24,55. In contrast, the CCR4–NOT complex decreases mRNAs responsible for differentiation to maintain pluripotency64,65,66. Therefore, the CCR4–NOT complex contributes to proper mRNA expression by decreasing unnecessary mRNAs depending on the context. The difference in mRNA-binding proteins that recruit the CCR4–NOT complex to target mRNAs could explain its diverse functions. It is also possible that tissue-specific RBPs compete with the interaction of the CCR4–NOT complex with particular mRNAs, as in the case of HuR and miRNA-induced silencing complex67. Global understanding of target mRNA recognition of the CCR4–NOT complex depending on the context will help to delineate the molecular basis of tissue-specific CCR4–NOT complex function.

In conclusion, our work identifies CNOT3 as an important post-transcriptional regulator of β-cell identity and function, and raises the possibility that alterations in CNOT3 expression and/or dysregulation of the CCR4–NOT complex contribute to β-cell failure in diabetes. It further raises the possibility that CNOT3 might offer a promising therapeutic target to protect β-cell function or to generate β cells for treatment of diabetes.

Methods

Mice

To suppress Cnot3 expression in β cells, we crossed mice carrying Cnot3 floxed alleles (Cnot3flox/flox)16,26 with Ins1-Cre mice (Riken Bioresource Center, # RBRC09525), in which Cre recombinase is knocked in at the Ins1 locus68. Recombination is expected to be restricted largely to β cells, and to be minimal at other sites, including the brain, where Ins1 is not expressed69. mTmG reporter mice (Jackson Laboratory, # 007676) were used to trace β cells in which Ins1-Cre-mediated recombination was induced. Primers used for genotyping are listed in Supplementary Table 2. β-cell-specific Cnot3 KO mice (Cnot3βKO) were used for experiments, and their littermates (Cnot3flox/flox) were used as controls, unless otherwise stated (Ins1-Cre mice were used as controls for Cnot3βKO expressing mTmG reporter gene). All experiments were performed on 8–10-week-old male mice, unless stated otherwise. db/db mice were used as a model of T2D22 and compared with +/db mice, purchased from CLEA Japan. We maintained mice on a 12-h light/dark cycle in a temperature-controlled (22 °C) barrier facility with free access to water and either a normal chow diet (NCD, CA-1, CLEA Japan) or a HFD (HFD32, CLEA Japan). All mouse experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.

Islet isolation

Pancreata were perfused with Collagenase P (Sigma) by injection in the common hepatic bile duct at a concentration of 1 mg/mL in Hank’s buffered salt solution (HBSS) medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin, BSA (Roche). Pancreata were then removed and dissociated in a 37 °C water bath for 16 min. Dissociated pancreata were passed through a metal sieve to remove undigested tissue chunks, followed by washing in HBSS supplemented with 0.1% BSA. Islets were then separated onto a gradient of Histopaque 1077 (Sigma) overlaid with RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (10,000 U/mL, Gibco). Afterward, islets were collected from the boundary of Histopaque 1077 and RPMI 1640 and passed through a 70-μm cell strainer into a cell culture dish with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin, from which islets were hand-picked for experiments to avoid contamination with exocrine tissue.

Cell lines

MIN6 (mouse insulinoma-6) β-cell line, a well-established model for the study of β-cell function, was used for some in vitro investigations70. MIN6 cells were obtained from Dr. Susumu Seino, Kobe University Graduate School of medicine. MIN6 cells were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Wako) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. For induction of glucotoxic stress, the glucose concentration was increased to 50 mM by dissolving glucose in culture medium followed by sterile filtration.

Fatty acid solution preparation and MIN6 cell line treatment

Palmitate stock solution was prepared by dissolving palmitate (Sigma P9767) in 50% ethanol at 70 °C to a final concentration of 100 mM. The stock solution was then diluted in culture medium with 0.5% BSA to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. Palmitate was allowed to complex with BSA for 30 min at 37 °C before being added to the cells. Cells not treated with palmitate were treated in the same manner, but palmitate stock solution was replaced with vehicle (50% ethanol).

Immunoblot analysis

Pancreatic islets and MIN6 cells were lysed using TNE lysis buffer (1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris–HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 10 mM NaF). All immunoblot analyses were done following SDS-PAGE standard protocols except for MCT1 and LDHA. We could not detect them by conventional western blotting and used automated Simple Wes system (ProteinSimple) for their detection.

We used an automated Simple Wes system, according to the manufacturer’s instructions with a 12–230 kDa Separation Module (ProteinSimple SM-W004) and the Anti-Rabbit Detection Module. Four microliters of islet lysate was combined with 1 µL Fluorescent Master Mix and heated at 95 °C for 5 min. The biotinylated ladder, samples, antibody diluent, primary antibodies (in antibody diluent), HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies, and chemiluminescent substrate were pipetted into the plate (part of the Separation Module). Instrument default settings were used: stacking and separation at 375 V for 25 min; blocking reagent for 5 min, primary and secondary antibody both for 30 min; Luminol/peroxide chemiluminescence detection for ~15 min. Details of primary and secondary antibodies used are listed in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4, respectively.

Glucose tolerance tests

Mice were fasted for 16 h, followed by fasting blood glucose measurement using blood samples taken from the tail vein. Mice were then injected intraperitoneally with glucose (2 g/kg body weight) and blood glucose was measured in tail vein blood samples at 15, 30, 60, and 90 min using the Glutest Pro glucometer (Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Japan).

GSIS assay in vivo

Mice were fasted for 16 h, followed by blood sample collection from a facial vein to evaluate serum insulin levels under no glucose stimulation. Mice were then injected intraperitoneally with glucose (2 g/kg body weight) and blood samples were collected from the facial vein 15 min post-glucose injection. Blood samples were allowed to clot in vacutainer tubes (BD Japan) at room temperature followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 4000 rpm and separation of serum. Serum insulin levels were measured using an ultrasensitive mouse insulin ELISA kit (Takara).

GSIS assay on islets ex vivo

Ten islets were pre-cultured in 450 µL Krebs Ringer buffer (KRB) (140 mM NaCl, 3.6 mM KCl, 0.5 mM NaH2PO4, 2 mM NaHCO3, 1.5 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgSO4, 10 mM HEPES, 0.25% BSA), pH = 7.4, containing 3 mM glucose for 1 h in open Eppendorf tubes. Supernatants were discarded and replaced with 450 µL KRB containing either 3 mM or 17 mM glucose for 1 h. Supernatants were collected after 1 h. Finally, islets were treated with 1 mL 1.5% HCl in ethanol and homogenized by sonication three times (30 s on/off). Acid/ethanol lysates were then centrifuged. Supernatants were collected to measure insulin content and residual islet fragments were used for DNA extraction. Insulin in KRB supernatant (released insulin) and islet lysates (islet insulin content) was measured using an ultrasensitive mouse insulin ELISA kit (Takara). Both released insulin and islets insulin content were normalized to islet DNA content.

Measurement of intracellular free calcium (Ca2+)

Functional multicellular Ca2+-imaging was performed on isolated islets previously incubated with Cal-520 acetoxymethyl (AM; 2 µM; Stratech) for 45 min at 37 °C in KRB supplemented with 3 mM glucose. Fluorescent imaging was performed using a Zeiss Axiovert microscope equipped with a 10–20×/0.3–0.5 NA objective, a Hamamatsu image-EM camera coupled to a Nipkow spinning disk head (Yokogawa CSU-10). Volocity software (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) provided the interface. Islets were kept at 37 °C and constantly perfused with KRB-containing 3 mM, 17 mM glucose or 20 mM KCl. For each experiment, ~20 islets were used, isolated from 3 animals per genotype. Imaging data were analyzed with ImageJ software using an in-house macro (available upon request). Fluorescent traces (F) were normalized to baseline recorded under 3 mM glucose (Fmin). The AUC at 17 mM glucose was calculated using different fluorescence baseline values (prior perfusion with high glucose) for each genotype group. The same approach was adopted to measure the AUC during KCl imaging, where baseline values prior to stimulation with KCl were used.

Pearson (R)-based connectivity and correlation analyses

Correlation analyses between the Ca2+ signal time series for all cell pairs of an imaged islet were performed in MATLAB using a modified custom-made script from the one previously described27. Briefly, a noise reduction function (effectively a rolling average) was applied to smooth noisy data and all traces were normalized to minimum (basal) fluorescence (Fmin). The correlation function R between all possible (smoothed) cell-pair combinations (excluding the autocorrelation) was assessed using the Pearson’s correlation. Data are displayed as heatmap matrices, indicating individual cell-pair connections on each axis (min. = 0; max. = 1). Cartesian co-ordinates of imaged cells were then taken into account, while constructing connectivity line maps. Cell pairs were connected with a straight line, the color of which represented the correlation strength, based on a color-coded light–dark ramp (R = 0.1–0.25 [blue], R = 0.26–0.5 [green], R = 0.51–0.75 [yellow], R = 0.76–1.0 [red]). Positive R values (excluding auto-correlated cells) and the percentage of cells that were significantly connected to one another were averaged and compared between groups.

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

All immunohistochemistry was performed on pancreatic sections from control and Cnot3βKO mice, except for CNOT3 immunofluorescence staining, which was performed on control and Cnot3βKO islets.

Pancreatic section preparation and Immunohistochemistry: Pancreata were fixed overnight in 4% PFA phosphate-buffered solution (Wako) at room temperature. They were then transferred to 70% ethanol and subsequently embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 3 μm. Some sections were stained with H&E. Other sections were used for immunofluorescence. All sections for immunofluorescence underwent dewaxing with xylene and rehydration with ethanol (100%, 95%, 70%, and 50%) by incubation for 3 min at room temperature. Antigen retrieval was performed using 10 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH = 6, at 120 °C in a pressure cooker for 10 min. Once sections cooled to room temperature, tissue samples were blocked with blocking buffer (2% BSA solution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 0.05% Tween) for 30 min to 1 h at room temperature. Samples were then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. On the following day, samples were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1–2 h in the dark at room temperature. A TUNEL assay was performed using an In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR red (Roche), following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Immunofluorescence staining of CNOT3: Islets were fixed in 4% PFA phosphate-buffered solution (Wako) for 10 min at room temperature. Then samples were washed twice in PBS for 5 min. Residual PFA was quenched by incubation with 100 mM glycine for 10 min at room temperature, followed by two washes with PBS. Islets were then permeabilized in 0.5% Triton-X-100 for 5 min at room temperature and rinsed twice with PBS. Islets were blocked with blocking buffer and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies in the same manner as described for pancreatic sections. Finally, samples were incubated with Ultra Cruz hard-set mounting medium with DAPI (Santa Cruz). Details of primary and secondary antibodies used are listed in Supplementary Tables 5 and 6, respectively.

Morphometric image analysis

All immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence images were acquired using a Leica confocal microscope (TCS SP8 Leica). All images were processed using Fiji (www.fiji.sc) and Imaris (v.2.9) softwares. To calculate β-cell mass, pancreatic sections were stained with insulin (β-cell area). Then, β-cell area was divided by total pancreatic area and multiplied by pancreatic weight (mg).

Transmission electron microscopy

We fixed islets in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 30 min at room temperature. After three washes with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, islets were fixed in 1% cacodylate-buffered osmium tetroxide for 1 h at room temperature, then dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections (50 nm) of islets were cut with a diamond knife, placed on copper grids, and stained with 4% uranium acetate for 30 min and then with Sato’s lead staining solution. Samples were examined using a JEOL JEM-1230R TEM.

RNA extraction and quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from islets or MIN6 cells with Isogen II, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Nippon Gene). RNA purity and concentration were evaluated by spectrophotometry using a NanoDrop ND-2000 (Thermo Fisher). The quality of RNA was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer microfluidics-based platform (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). To measure mRNA stability, islets were treated with Act D (5 μg/mL), a transcription inhibitor, and total RNA was extracted at the indicated time points and subjected to qPCR. Total RNA (1 μg) was used for reverse transcription with oligo(dT)12–18primer (Invitrogen) using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). qPCR reactions were carried out using TB Green Premix Ex Taq (Takara) and the ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Gapdh mRNA levels were used for normalization. Relative mRNA expression was determined by ∆∆CT method. Primers used for qPCR reactions are listed in Supplementary Table 7.

Bulk poly(A) tail assay

Bulk poly(A) tail assay was conducted as previously described. Total RNA (2 µg) was labeled with [5′-32P] pCp (cytidine 3′,5′-bis[phosphate]) (0.11 pmol/μL in a total reaction volume of 30 μL) (PerkinElmer; NEG019A) using T4 RNA ligase 1 (NEB, M0204S) at 16 °C overnight. Labeled RNAs were incubated at 85 °C for 5 min and placed on ice. Then, labeled RNAs were digested with Ribonuclease A (50 ng/μL, Sigma) and Ribonuclease T1 (1.25 U/μL, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C for 2 h in digestion buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl [pH 7.5], 3 M NaCl, 0.5 μg/mL yeast tRNA). Reactions were stopped by adding 5× stop solution (10 mg/mL Proteinase K, 0.125 M EDTA, 2.5% SDS) and subsequently incubating at 37 °C for 30 min. After adding 400 μL of RNA precipitation buffer (0.5 M NH4OAc, 10 mM EDTA), digested RNA samples were purified by phenol–chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. Final products (10 μL) were mixed with RNA Gel loading Dye (NEB, R0641) and incubated at 95 °C for 2 min. Samples were fractionated on an 8 M urea-10% polyacrylamide denaturing gel (0.8 mm thick). Marker (Prestain Marker for small RNA Plus, BioDynamics Laboratory DM253) was also loaded. The gel was analyzed with a Typhoon FLA 9500 Fluorescence Imager (GE Healthcare). Band intensity was quantified using ImageJ.

RNA sequencing

RNA-seq was performed by the next-generation sequencing section at OIST Graduate University. Hundred nanograms of total RNA was used for RNA-seq library preparation with a TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Prep Kit for NeoPrep (NP-202-1001; Illumina) that allows polyA-oligo(dT)-based purification of mRNA. The manufacturer’s protocol was employed with minor modification and optimization as follows. Custom dual index adapters were ligated at the 5′ and 3′-end of libraries, and PCR was performed for 11 cycles. One hundred fifty-base-pair paired-end read RNA-seq was performed with a Hiseq 3000/4000 PE Cluster Kit (PE-410-1001; Illumina) and a Hiseq 3000/4000 SBS Kit (300 Cycles) (FC-410-1003; Illumina) on a Hiseq4000 (Illumina), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Bioinformatic processing of RNA-seq data

Paired-end RNA-seq data were mapped to the Mus musculus reference strain mm10 UCSC using StrandNGS, next-generation sequencing analysis software. Counts for each sample were imported into the R statistical environment. Genes without an expression level of at least one read per million mapped reads in at least three samples were removed before differential-gene expression testing between control, and Cnot3βKO islet RNA replicates, using the edgeR function in the Bioconductor package edgeR. Genes that were DE with an FDR adjusted P value (padj) <0.05 were considered statistically significant and included in enrichment testing. We identified GO terms enriched among significantly upregulated and downregulated genes using the DAVID annotation tool (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/). GO terms were considered significantly enriched if they had an FDR value < 0.05.

Sample preparation for proteomic analysis

Samples were prepared for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) using the phase-transfer surfactant method, with minor modifications. First, proteins were extracted from islets and solubilized using buffer containing 12 mM sodium deoxycholate, 12 mM sodium N-dodecanoylsarcosinate, and 100 mM Tris pH 9.0, with EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Switzerland). Islet samples were sonicated for 10 min using a Bioruptor (Cosmo Bio, Japan) on high power with 1-min on/1-min off cycles. Cell debris was removed after centrifugation at 18,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. Protein concentrations were adjusted to a uniform concentration for a set of samples (0.5–1.0 μg/μL), and between 5 and 20 μg protein was used for peptide preparation. Cysteine–cysteine disulfide bonds were reduced with 10 mM dithiothreitol at 50 °C for 30 min. Free thiol groups were alkylated with 40 mM iodoacetamide in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. Alkylation reactions were quenched with 55 mM cysteine at room temperature for 10 min. Samples were diluted with 2.76 volumes of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Lysyl endopeptidase (Wako, Japan) and trypsin (Promega, USA) were added at a 50:1 ratio of sample protein:enzyme (w/w) and samples were digested for 14 h at 37 °C. Afterward, 1.77 volumes ethyl acetate were added, and samples were acidified with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), which was added to 0.46% (v/v). Following centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature, samples separated into two phases. The upper organic phase containing sodium deoxycholate was removed, and the lower aqueous phase containing digested tryptic peptides was dried using a centrifugal vacuum concentrator. Digested peptides were dissolved in 300 µL of 0.1% (v/v) TFA in 3% acetonitrile (v/v) and samples were desalted using MonoSpin C18 columns (GL Sciences Inc., Japan). Peptides were eluted from C18 columns using 0.1% TFA in 50% acetonitrile and dried in a vacuum concentrator. Tryptic peptides were dissolved in 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in 3% (v/v) acetonitrile for MS analysis.

MS measurement

Samples were measured using a Q-Exactive Plus Orbitrap LC–MS/MS System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), equipped with a Nanospray Flex ion source. The same amount of peptide was injected for each sample in a given set of samples, which was typically 300–600 ng in a volume of 2 to 5 µL. Peptides were separated on a 3-µm particle, 75-µm inner diameter, 12-cm filling length C18 column (Nikkyo Technos Co., Ltd, Japan). A flow rate of 300 nL/min was used with a 2-h gradient (1–34% solvent B in 108 min, 34–95% solvent B in 2 min, with a final wash at 95% solvent B for 10 min, where solvent A was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in LC/MS grade water and solvent B was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in 80% (v/v) acetonitrile). The mass spectrometer ion transfer tube temperature was 250 °C and 2.0 kV spray voltage was applied during sample measurement.

For data-dependent acquisition (DDA), full MS spectra were acquired from 380 to 1500 m/z at a resolution of 70,000. The AGC target was set to 3e6 with a maximum injection time (IT) of 100 ms. MS2 scans were recorded for the top 20 precursors at 17,500 resolution with an AGC of 1e5 and a maximum IT of 60 ms. The first mass was fixed at 150 m/z. The default charge state for the MS2 was set to 2. HCD fragmentation was set to normalized collision energy of 27%. The intensity threshold was set to 1.3e4, charge states 2–5 were included, and dynamic exclusion was set to 20 s.

For data-independent acquisition (DIA), data were acquired with 1 full MS and 32 overlapping isolation windows constructed covering the precursor mass range of 400–1200 m/z. For full MS, resolution was set to 70,000. The AGC target was set to 5e6 and maximum IT was set to 120 ms. DIA segments were acquired at 35,000 resolution with an AGC target of 3e5 and an automatic maximum IT. The first mass was fixed at 150 m/z. HCD fragmentation was set to normalized collision energy of 27%.

Protein identification and quantification

Raw files from DDA measurements were searched against the Uniprot mouse database using Proteome Discoverer v2.2 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Digestion enzyme specificity was set to Trypsin/P. Precursor and fragment mass tolerance were set to 10 ppm and 0.02 Da, respectively. Modification included carbamidomethylation of cysteine as a fixed modification, with oxidation of methionine and acetyl (protein N-terminus) as variable modifications. Up to two missed cleavages were allowed. A decoy database was included to calculate the FDR. Search results were filtered with FDR 0.01 at both peptide and protein levels. Filtered output was used to generate a sample-specific spectral library using Spectronaut software (Biognosys, Switzerland). Raw files from DIA measurements were used for quantitative data extraction with the generated spectral library. FDR was estimated with the mProphet approach71 and set to 0.01 at both peptide precursor level and protein level72. Data were filtered with FDR < 0.01 in at least half of the samples.

RNA immunoprecipitation

RIP was done on MIN6 cells using anti-CNOT3 antibody (generated by immunizing mice in cooperation with Bio Matrix Research Incorporation). MIN6 cells, 80% confluent in 10-cm dishes were lysed with 1 mL TNE buffer per dish. MIN6 cell lysates were then incubated with 1 µg of either anti-CNOT3 or control IgG antibody in an upside-down tumbling manner for 1 h at 4 °C, and then incubated with 40 μL of protein G Dynabeads (Invitrogen) in an upside-down tumbling manner for 2 h at 4 °C. Later, beads were separated using a magnetic rack and washed five times with TNE buffer. RNAs in immune complexes were isolated using Isogen II, and cDNA was generated with SuperScript Reverse Transcriptase III followed by qPCR. Abundance of each mRNA is quantified as % of input mRNA. Then mRNA bound to anti-CNOT3 antibody was presented as fold change relative to mRNA bound to control IgG antibody.

Statistics and reproducibility

Differences between groups were examined for statistical significance using the Student’s t test (two-tailed distribution with two-sample equal variance), Mann–Whitney test, or One-way ANOVA. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software v.8.0), RStudio (v.1.1.453) and GSEA (v.4.0.1) developed by Broad Institute (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp). A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sample sizes and number of replicates are indicated in figure legends.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All source data underlying the graphs and charts presented in the main and supplementary figures are presented in Supplementary Data 1. Raw transcriptomic data sets described in the current study are available through ArrayExpress under accession number E-MTAB-8729. Mass spectrometric proteomics data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD018403.

Code availability

The scripts used for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data and mRNA stability analysis are provided in the Supplementary Information file. The script used for mRNA stability analysis was previously published in ref. 40 and can be accessed via this link: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fnbt.3269/MediaObjects/41587_2015_BFnbt3269_MOESM34_ESM.tar. We also deposited all the scripts we used and their data files in GitHub: https://github.com/Dina-Mostafa/Scripts-for-differential-gene-expression-analysis.

References

  1. 1.

    Ashcroft, FrancesM. & Rorsman, P. Diabetes mellitus and the β cell: the last ten years. Cell 148, 1160–1171 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Talchai, C. et al. Pancreatic β cell dedifferentiation as a mechanism of diabetic β cell failure. Cell 150, 1223–1234 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rutter, GuyA., Pullen, TimothyJ., Hodson, DavidJ. & Martinez-Sanchez, A. Pancreatic β-cell identity, glucose sensing and the control of insulin secretion. Biochem. J. 466, 203–218 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wicksteed, B., Alarcon, C., Briaud, I., Lingohr, M. K. & Rhodes, C. J. Glucose-induced translational control of proinsulin biosynthesis is proportional to preproinsulin mRNA levels in islet beta-cells but not regulated via a positive feedback of secreted insulin. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 42080–42090 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Guay, C. et al. Emerging roles of non-coding RNAs in pancreatic β-cell function and dysfunction. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 14, 12–21 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Martinez-Sanchez, A., Rutter, G. A. & Latreille, M. MiRNAs in β-cell development, identity, and disease. Front. Genet. 7, 226 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Martinez-Sanchez, A., Nguyen-Tu, M.-S. & Rutter, G. A. DICER inactivation identifies pancreatic β-cell disallowed genes targeted by MicroRNAs. Mol. Endocrinol. 29, 1067–1079 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Eckmann, C. R., Rammelt, C. & Wahle, E. Control of poly(A) tail length. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2, 348–361 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Garneau, N. L., Wilusz, J. & Wilusz, C. J. The highways and byways of mRNA decay. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 113–126 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shirai, Y. T., Suzuki, T., Morita, M., Takahashi, A. & Yamamoto, T. Multifunctional roles of the mammalian CCR4–NOT complex in physiological phenomena. Front. Genet. 5, 286 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Collart, M. A. The Ccr4-Not complex is a key regulator of eukaryotic gene expression. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 7, 438–454 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Raisch, T. et al. Reconstitution of recombinant human CCR4–NOT reveals molecular insights into regulated deadenylation. Nat. Commun. 10, 3173 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chekulaeva, M. et al. miRNA repression involves GW182-mediated recruitment of CCR4–NOT through conserved W-containing motifs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2166 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Fabian, M. R. et al. miRNA-mediated deadenylation is orchestrated by GW182 through two conserved motifs that interact with CCR4–NOT. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1211–1217 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Takahashi, A. et al. Post-transcriptional stabilization of Ucp1 mRNA protects mice from diet-induced obesity. Cell Rep. 13, 2756–2767 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li, X. et al. Adipocyte-specific disruption of mouse Cnot3 causes lipodystrophy. FEBS Lett. 591, 358–368 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Morita, M. et al. Obesity resistance and increased hepatic expression of catabolism-related mRNAs in Cnot3+/- mice. EMBO J. 30, 4678–4691 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Takahashi, A. et al. The CCR4–NOT deadenylase complex maintains adipocyte identity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5274 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pullen, T. J., Huising, M. O. & Rutter, G. A. Analysis of purified pancreatic islet beta and alpha cell transcriptomes reveals 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (Hsd11b1) as a novel disallowed gene. Front. Genet. 8, 41 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lemaire, K. et al. How stable is repression of disallowed genes in pancreatic islets in response to metabolic stress? PLoS ONE 12, e0181651 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lemaire, K., Thorrez, L. & Schuit, F. Disallowed and allowed gene expression: two faces of mature islet beta cells. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 36, 45–71 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kobayashi, K. et al. The db/db mouse, a model for diabetic dyslipidemia: Molecular characterization and effects of western diet feeding. Metabolism 49, 22–31 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    MacDonald, P. E. & Rorsman, P. Oscillations, intercellular coupling, and insulin secretion in pancreatic β cells. PLoS Biol. 4, e49 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yamaguchi, T. et al. The CCR4–NOT deadenylase complex controls Atg7-dependent cell death and heart function. Sci. Signal. 11, eaan3638 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Inoue, T. et al. CNOT3 contributes to early B cell development by controlling Igh rearrangement and p53 mRNA stability. J. Exp. Med. 212, 1465–1479 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Suzuki, T. et al. CNOT3 suppression promotes necroptosis by stabilizing mRNAs for cell death-inducing proteins. Sci. Rep. 5, 14779 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Salem, V. et al. Leader β-cells coordinate Ca2+ dynamics across pancreatic islets in vivo. Nat. Metab. 1, 615–629 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Momose, K. et al. Immunohistochemical and electron-microscopic observation of beta-cells in pancreatic islets of spontaneously diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats. Med. Mol. Morph. 39, 146–153 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Benninger, R. K. & Piston, D. W. Cellular communication and heterogeneity in pancreatic islet insulin secretion dynamics. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 25, 399–406 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kim-Muller, J. Y. et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1a3 defines a subset of failing pancreatic β cells in diabetic mice. Nat. Commun. 7, 12631 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cinti, F. et al. Evidence of beta-cell dedifferentiation in human type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 101, 1044–1054 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nishimura, W., Takahashi, S. & Yasuda, K. MafA is critical for maintenance of the mature beta cell phenotype in mice. Diabetologia 58, 566–574 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    van der Meulen, T. & Huising, M. O. Maturation of stem cell-derived beta-cells guided by the expression of urocortin 3. Rev. Diabet. Stud. 11, 115–132 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bellomo, E. A., Meur, G. & Rutter, G. A. Glucose regulates free cytosolic Zn2+ concentration, Slc39 (ZiP), and metallothionein gene expression in primary pancreatic islet β-Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 25778–25789 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zito, E., Chin, K.-T., Blais, J., Harding, H. P. & Ron, D. ERO1-β, a pancreas-specific disulfide oxidase, promotes insulin biogenesis and glucose homeostasis. J. Cell Biol. 188, 821–832 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Prentki, M., Matschinsky, F. M. & Madiraju, S. R. Metabolic signaling in fuel-induced insulin secretion. Cell Metab. 18, 162–185 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Haythorne, E. et al. Diabetes causes marked inhibition of mitochondrial metabolism in pancreatic β-cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 2474 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pullen, T. J. et al. Overexpression of monocarboxylate transporter-1 (SLC16A1) in mouse pancreatic beta-cells leads to relative hyperinsulinism during exercise. Diabetes 61, 1719–1725 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chen, C.-Y. A., Ezzeddine, N. & Shyu, A.-B. Messenger RNA half-life measurements in mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol. 448, 335–357 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gaidatzis, D., Burger, L., Florescu, M. & Stadler, M. B. Analysis of intronic and exonic reads in RNA-seq data characterizes transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 722–729 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Neelankal John, A., Ram, R. & Jiang, F. X. RNA-seq analysis of islets to characterise the dedifferentiation in type 2 diabetes model mice db/db. Endocr. Pathol. 29, 207–221 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Dhawan, S. et al. DNA methylation directs functional maturation of pancreatic β cells. J. Clin. Investig. 125, 2851–2860 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ni, Q. et al. Raptor regulates functional maturation of murine beta cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 15755–15755 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Pullen, T. J. & Rutter, G. A. When less is more: the forbidden fruits of gene repression in the adult β-cell. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 15, 503–512 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pullen, T. J. et al. Identification of genes selectively disallowed in the pancreatic islet. Islets 2, 89–95 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Thorrez, L. et al. Tissue-specific disallowance of housekeeping genes: the other face of cell differentiation. Genome Res. 21, 95–105 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Blum, B. et al. Functional beta-cell maturation is marked by an increased glucose threshold and by expression of urocortin 3. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 261 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Liu, J. S. E. & Hebrok, M. All mixed up: defining roles for β-cell subtypes in mature islets. Genes Dev. 31, 228–240 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhao, C. & Rutter, G. A. Overexpression of lactate dehydrogenase A attenuates glucose-induced insulin secretion in stable MIN-6 β-cell lines. FEBS Lett. 430, 213–216 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Becker, T. C., BeltrandelRio, H., Noel, R. J., Johnson, J. H. & Newgard, C. B. Overexpression of hexokinase I in isolated islets of Langerhans via recombinant adenovirus. Enhancement of glucose metabolism and insulin secretion at basal but not stimulatory glucose levels. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21234–21238 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Chen, H. et al. PDGF signalling controls age-dependent proliferation in pancreatic β-cells. Nature 478, 349–355 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    van Arensbergen, J. et al. Derepression of Polycomb targets during pancreatic organogenesis allows insulin-producing beta-cells to adopt a neural gene activity program. Genome Res. 20, 722–732 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Martinez-Sanchez, A. et al. Disallowance of Acot7 in β-cells is required for normal glucose tolerance and insulin secretion. Diabetes 65, 1268–1282 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Pullen, T. J., da Silva Xavier, G., Kelsey, G. & Rutter, G. A. miR-29a and miR-29b contribute to pancreatic beta-cell-specific silencing of monocarboxylate transporter 1 (Mct1). Mol. Cel. Biol. 31, 3182–3194 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Suzuki, T. et al. Postnatal liver functional maturation requires Cnot complex-mediated decay of mRNAs encoding cell cycle and immature liver genes. Development 146, dev168146 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gerst, F. et al. The expression of aldolase B in islets is negatively associated with insulin secretion in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 103, 4373–4383 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Solimena, M. et al. Systems biology of the IMIDIA biobank from organ donors and pancreatectomised patients defines a novel transcriptomic signature of islets from individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 61, 641–657 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kanazawa, A. et al. Association of the gene encoding wingless-type mammary tumor virus integration-site family member 5B (WNT5B) with type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75, 832–843 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Swisa, A. et al. PAX6 maintains β cell identity by repressing genes of alternative islet cell types. J. Clin. Investig. 127, 230–243 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Piccand, J. et al. Rfx6 maintains the functional identity of adult pancreatic beta cells. Cell Rep. 9, 2219–2232 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Gutierrez, G. D. et al. Pancreatic beta cell identity requires continual repression of non-beta cell programs. J. Clin. Investig. 127, 244–259 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Schrimpe-Rutledge, A. C. et al. Discovery of novel glucose-regulated proteins in isolated human pancreatic islets using LC-MS/MS-based proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 11, 3520–3532 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Takahashi, A. et al. The CCR4–NOT complex maintains liver homeostasis through mRNA deadenylation. Life Sci. Alliance 3, e201900494 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zhou, B. et al. Cnot3 enhances human embryonic cardiomyocyte proliferation by promoting cell cycle inhibitor mRNA degradation. Sci. Rep. 7, 1500 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zheng, X. et al. CNOT3-dependent mRNA deadenylation safeguards the pluripotent state. Stem Cell Rep. 7, 897–910 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zheng, X. et al. Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 maintain mouse and human ESC identity and inhibit extraembryonic differentiation. Stem Cells 30, 910–922 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Gardiner, A. S., Twiss, J. L. & Perrone-Bizzozero, N. I. Competing interactions of RNA-binding proteins, microRNAs, and their targets control neuronal development and function. Biomolecules 5, 2903–2918 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hasegawa, Y. et al. Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated bicistronic knock-in Ins1-cre driver mice. Exp. Anim. 65, 319–327 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Thorens, B. et al. Ins1(Cre) knock-in mice for beta cell-specific gene recombination. Diabetologia 58, 558–565 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Minami, K. et al. Insulin secretion and differential gene expression in glucose-responsive and -unresponsive MIN6 sublines. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 279, E773–E781 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Reiter, L. et al. mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments. Nat. Methods 8, 430–435 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Rosenberger, G. et al. Statistical control of peptide and protein error rates in large-scale targeted data-independent acquisition analyses. Nat. Methods 14, 921–927 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding of the Cell Signal Unit at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) Graduate University. We thank the next-generation sequencing section at OIST Graduate University for performing library preparations and RNA-seq. A.Y. was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (18K06975) from the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. G.A.R. was supported by a Wellcome Investigator (212625/Z/18/Z) Award, MRC Programme grants (MR/R022259/1, MR/J0003042/1, MR/L020149/1), MRC (MR/N00275X/1), and Diabetes UK (BDA/11/0004210, BDA/15/0005275, BDA 16/0005485) project grants. This work has received support from the EU/EFPIA/Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (RHAPSODY grant no 115881) to G.A.R. We thank Patrick Stoney, Akinori Takahashi and Shohei Takaoka (Cell Signal Unit, OIST) for the helpful comments and advice. We are grateful to Toshio Sasaki (Imaging section, OIST) for helping with islet sample preparation for TEM and imaging. We also thank Julie Chouinard (Neurobiology Research Unit, OIST) for helping D.M. use Imaris software.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.M. and T.Y. designed and directed the study. D.M. conducted all the experiments. A.Y. performed the bulk poly(A) tail analysis experiment, some immunohistochemistry and provided GSIS and immunohistochemistry protocols. E.G. and G.A.R. performed islet Ca2+ imaging. Y.W. conducted the proteomic analysis. E.G. and T. Stylianides generated and used the Matlab scripts for the connectivity maps and heatmaps. A.Y. and T. Suzuki provided critical comments and suggestions and edited the figures. D.M., A.Y., G.A.R., T. Suzuki, and T.Y. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Toru Suzuki or Tadashi Yamamoto.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mostafa, D., Yanagiya, A., Georgiadou, E. et al. Loss of β-cell identity and diabetic phenotype in mice caused by disruption of CNOT3-dependent mRNA deadenylation. Commun Biol 3, 476 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01201-y

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing