Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Germanium-enriched double-four-membered-ring units inducing zeolite-confined subnanometric Pt clusters for efficient propane dehydrogenation

Abstract

It is a great challenge to regulate the precise placement of confined metal species and assemble specific structures at the atomic level. Here we report the design and synthesis of a durable supported-metal-cluster catalyst, Pt@Ge-UTL, that features subnanometric Pt clusters encapsulated inside the extra-large pores of a stabilized UTL-type germanosilicate. Integrated differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy, in situ X-ray absorption fine structure, 19F magic-angle-spinning NMR, full-range synchrotron pair distribution function G(r) analysis and density functional theory calculations revealed that Pt clusters with an average of four atoms are firmly segregated within 14-membered-ring channels. This is achieved by selectively and directionally anchoring Pt, via Pt–O–Ge bonding, to the UTL zeolite’s unique secondary building units that feature a double-four-membered-ring (d4r) configuration and a Ge-enriched composition. The host–guest bimetallic structure (Pt4-Ge2-d4r@UTL) promotes propane dehydrogenation with high activity, high propylene selectivity and long-term stability. This research demonstrates the use of germanosilicates in the designed synthesis of high-performance propane dehydrogenation catalysts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Dispersity of Pt species in a series of UTL zeolites with different Si/Ge ratios.
Fig. 2: Catalytic performance for the PDH reaction.
Fig. 3: Location of subnanometric Pt species within the channels of UTL topology.
Fig. 4: Characterization of the chemical states and coordination environments of Pt and Ge.
Fig. 5: Positions of Ge atoms in the support and Pt-confined catalyst.
Fig. 6: Calculation results for constructing the theoretical structure.
Fig. 7: Validation of the Pt4-Ge2-d4r@UTL structure model.
Fig. 8: Calculation results for the theoretical PDH process.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data needed to support the plots and evaluate the conclusions of this study are present within the Article and the Supplementary Information or are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Sattler, J. J. et al. Catalytic dehydrogenation of light alkanes on metals and metal oxides. Chem. Rev. 114, 10613–10653 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Xi, J. et al. Synthesis strategies, catalytic applications, and performance regulation of single-atom catalysts. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2008318 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, W. L. et al. Direct observation of a long-lived single-atom catalyst chiseling atomic structures in graphene. Nano Lett. 14, 450–455 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shi, Y. et al. Single-atom catalysis in mesoporous photovoltaics: the principle of utility maximization. Adv. Mater. 26, 8147–8153 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, L. et al. Evolution of isolated atoms and clusters in catalysis. Trends Chem. 2, 383–400 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun, G. et al. Breaking the scaling relationship via thermally stable Pt/Cu single atom alloys for catalytic dehydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 9, 4454 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiong, H. et al. Thermally stable and regenerable platinum–tin clusters for propane dehydrogenation prepared by atom trapping on ceria. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 8986–8991 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goel, S. et al. Encapsulation of metal clusters within MFI via interzeolite transformations and direct hydrothermal syntheses and catalytic consequences of their confinement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15280–15290 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, N. et al. In situ confinement of ultrasmall Pd clusters within nanosized silicalite-1 zeolite for highly efficient catalysis of hydrogen generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 7484–7487 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, J. et al. Sinter-resistant metal nanoparticle catalysts achieved by immobilization within zeolite crystals via seed-directed growth. Nat. Catal. 1, 540–546 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, Q. et al. Synergetic effect of ultrasmall metal clusters and zeolites promoting hydrogen generation. Adv. Sci. 6, 1802350 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, Q. et al. Zeolite-encaged single-atom rhodium catalysts: highly-efficient hydrogen generation and shape-selective tandem hydrogenation of nitroarenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 18570–18576 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, L. et al. Regioselective generation and reactivity control of subnanometric platinum clusters in zeolites for high-temperature catalysis. Nat. Mater. 18, 866–873 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu, J. et al. Ultrafast encapsulation of metal nanoclusters into MFI zeolite in the course of its crystallization: catalytic application for propane dehydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19669–19674 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, Q. et al. Subnanometer bimetallic platinum–zinc clusters in zeolites for propane dehydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19450–19459 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y. et al. Ultrasmall PtZn bimetallic nanoclusters encapsulated in silicalite-1 zeolite with superior performance for propane dehydrogenation. J. Catal. 385, 61–69 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Searles, K. et al. Highly productive propane dehydrogenation catalyst using silica-supported Ga–Pt nanoparticles generated from single-sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 11674–11679 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, Z. et al. Changes in catalytic and adsorptive properties of 2 nm Pt3Mn nanoparticles by subsurface atoms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 14870–14877 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, L. et al. Structural modulation and direct measurement of subnanometric bimetallic PtSn clusters confined in zeolites. Nat. Catal. 3, 628–638 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Uemura, Y. et al. In situ time-resolved XAFS study on the structural transformation and phase separation of Pt3Sn and PtSn alloy nanoparticles on carbon in the oxidation process. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 15833–15844 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramallo-López, J. M. et al. XPS and XAFS Pt L2,3-edge studies of dispersed metallic Pt and PtSn clusters on SiO2 obtained by organometallic synthesis: structural and electronic characteristics. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 11441–11451 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deng, L. et al. Elucidating strong metal–support interactions in Pt–Sn/SiO2 catalyst and its consequences for dehydrogenation of lower alkanes. J. Catal. 365, 277–291 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, Z. et al. Propane dehydrogenation over Pt clusters localized at the Sn single-site in zeolite framework. ACS Catal. 10, 818–828 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma, Y. et al. Skeleton-Sn anchoring isolated Pt site to confine subnanometric clusters within *BEA topology. J. Catal. 397, 44–57 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Paillaud, J. et al. Extra-large-pore zeolites with two-dimensional channels formed by 14 and 12 rings. Science 304, 990–992 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Corma, A. et al. ITQ-15: the first ultralarge pore zeolite with a bi-directional pore system formed by intersecting 14- and 12-ring channels, and its catalytic implications. Chem. Commun. 1356–1357 (2004).

  27. Roth, W. et al. Postsynthesis transformation of three-dimensional framework into a lamellar zeolite with modifiable architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 6130–6133 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roth, W. et al. A family of zeolites with controlled pore size prepared using a top-down method. Nat. Chem. 5, 628–633 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morris, S. et al. In situ solid-state NMR and XRD studies of the ADOR process and the unusual structure of zeolite IPC-6. Nat. Chem. 9, 1012–1018 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wheatley, P. et al. Zeolites with continuously tuneable porosity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 13210–13214 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mazur, M. et al. Synthesis of ‘unfeasible’ zeolites. Nat. Chem. 8, 58–62 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, Y. et al. Encapsulation of Pt nanoparticles into IPC-2 and IPC-4 zeolites using the ADOR approach. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 279, 364–370 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sajad, M. et al. Direct dehydrogenation of propane over Pd nanoparticles encapsulated within IPC zeolites with tunable pore sizes. Appl. Mater. Today 29, 101644 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li, A. et al. Encapsulating metal nanoparticles into a layered zeolite precursor with surface silanol nests enhances sintering resistance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202213361 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, L. et al. Generation of subnanometric platinum with high stability during transformation of a 2D zeolite into 3D. Nat. Mater. 16, 132–138 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu, H. et al. Post-synthesis treatment gives highly stable siliceous zeolites through the isomorphous substitution of silicon for germanium in germanosilicates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1355–1359 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. De La Cruz, C. et al. An exploration of the surfaces of some Pt/SiO2 catalysts using CO as an infrared spectroscopic probe. Spectrochim. Acta A 50, 271–285 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stakheev, A. Y. et al. Electronic state and location of Pt metal clusters in KL zeolite: FTIR study of CO chemisorption. Catal. Lett. 32, 147–158 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Klünker, C. et al. CO stretching vibrations on Pt(111) and Pt(110) studied by sumfrequency generation. Surf. Sci. 360, 104–111 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lazić, I. et al. Phase contrast STEM for thin samples: integrated differential phase contrast. Ultramicroscopy 160, 265–280 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yücelen, E. et al. Phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy imaging of light and heavy atoms at the limit of contrast and resolution. Sci. Rep. 8, 2676 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Odoh, S. O. et al. Preferential location of germanium in the UTL and IPC-2a zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. C. 118, 26939–26946 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kamakoti, P. et al. Role of germanium in the formation of double four rings in zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. C. 111, 3575–3583 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sastre, G. et al. Preferential location of Ge atoms in polymorph C of beta zeolite (ITQ-17) and their structure-directing effect: a computational, XRD, and NMR spectroscopic study. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 4722–4726 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Blasco, T. et al. Preferential Location of Ge in the double four-membered ring units of ITQ-7 zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 2634–2642 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu, X. et al. Fluoride removal from double four-membered ring (D4R) units in as-synthesized Ge-containing zeolites. Chem. Mater. 23, 5052–5057 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang, M.-L. et al. First-principles calculations of propane dehydrogenation over PtSn catalysts. ACS Catal. 2, 1247–1258 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zha, S. et al. Identification of Pt-based catalysts for propane dehydrogenation via a probability analysis. Chem. Sci. 9, 3925–3931 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Fricke, C. et al. Propane dehydrogenation on platinum catalysts: identifying the active sites through Bayesian analysis. ACS Catal. 12, 2487–2498 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 21872052, 21972044, 22172050 and 22105028), the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA1501401), ‘Grassland Talents’ of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (NJYT23030), ‘Steed plan High level Talents’ of Inner Mongolia University, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number 2022CDJXY-003). We gratefully acknowledge the BL17B beamline of the National Facility for Protein Science (NFPS), Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) Shanghai, China for providing the beam time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.W. conceived the project and directed the study. Y.M. carried out the synthesis, structural characterizations and catalytic measurements and wrote the manuscript. H.X. and Y.G. contributed to the experimental design and data interpretation. J.J. carried out the 19F MAS NMR measurements. L.Z. carried out the infrared CO-adsorption experiments. C.L., Y.Z. and X.W. assisted in the preparation method of the catalyst. L.L. and Y.H. carried out the Cs-corrected HAADF-STEM and iDPC-STEM measurements and images. J.Z. contributed to the collection and analysis of XAFS and PDF data in the BL17b beamline of the National Facility for Protein Science (NFPS), Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF). S.S. and W.S. carried out the theoretical calculations. All the authors discussed the results and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao Xu, Yejun Guan, Weiyu Song, Yu Han, Jiangwei Zhang or Peng Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Catalysis thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Notes 1–3, Figs. 1–44, Tables 1–11 and refs. 1–8.

Supplementary Data

Atomic coordinates of the computational models.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 8

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Song, S., Liu, C. et al. Germanium-enriched double-four-membered-ring units inducing zeolite-confined subnanometric Pt clusters for efficient propane dehydrogenation. Nat Catal 6, 506–518 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-023-00968-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-023-00968-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing