Understanding hydrocarbon generation in the zeolite-catalysed conversions of methanol and methyl chloride requires advanced spectroscopic approaches to distinguish the complex mechanisms governing C–C bond formation, chain growth and the deposition of carbonaceous species. Here operando photoelectron photoion coincidence (PEPICO) spectroscopy enables the isomer-selective identification of pathways to hydrocarbons of up to C14 in size, providing direct experimental evidence of methyl radicals in both reactions and ketene in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction. Both routes converge to C5 molecules that transform into aromatics. Operando PEPICO highlights distinctions in the prevalence of coke precursors, which is supported by electron paramagnetic resonance measurements, providing evidence of differences in the representative molecular structure, density and distribution of accumulated carbonaceous species. Radical-driven pathways in the methyl chloride-to-hydrocarbons reaction(s) accelerate the formation of extended aromatic systems, leading to fast deactivation. By contrast, the generation of alkylated species through oxygenate-driven pathways in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction extends the catalyst lifetime. The findings demonstrate the potential of the presented methods to provide valuable mechanistic insights into complex reaction networks.
Monosubstituted methanes, including methanol and methyl chloride (CH3X, X = OH and Cl, respectively), are attractive building blocks for sustainable fuels and chemicals1,2,3,4,5,6,7. These C1 molecules are the main products of syngas conversion, carbon dioxide hydrogenation and halogen-mediated alkane functionalization, and can be readily converted into valuable hydrocarbons over zeolite catalysts8,9,10,11,12,13. However, uncontrolled chain growth typically results in broad product distributions and the deposition of heavy carbonaceous species, leading to suboptimal catalyst selectivity and stability. Towards improving productivity, extensive experimental and theoretical efforts have been devoted to understanding the mechanism of C–C bond formation and its propagation to higher hydrocarbons in the commercially applied methanol-to-hydrocarbons (MTH) reaction1,14,15,16,17,18. Detailed kinetic studies, often combined with isotopic labelling and spectroscopic experiments, evidenced the autocatalytic nature of the process, provided the basis for the widely accepted dual aromatic–olefin cycles and identified several intermediates expected to play crucial roles in the early stages and steady-state operation of the reaction (Supplementary Note 1)19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31. Despite these advances, several questions about the mechanism remain strongly debated, including the existence and role of radical species, the mechanism of the first C–C bond formation and subsequent paths to the early aromatic hydrocarbon pool (HCP) species. Furthermore, archetypical dissolution–extraction experiments and spectroscopic measurements have provided limited insight into the specific structures of the coke precursors and their evolution into carbonaceous species deposited within the zeolite catalyst (Supplementary Note 1).
Comparatively, mechanistic understanding of the methyl chloride-to-hydrocarbons (MCTH) reaction is less developed. Previous studies have focused on kinetic aspects, showing broadly similar product distributions to the MTH process, attributed to similar confinement effects within the zeolite pore networks on HCP development11,12,32,33,34. Nevertheless, the absence of oxygenates and the faster catalyst deactivation reported in the MCTH process suggest that important mechanistic distinctions exist. A systematic comparison of the pathways for the activation and subsequent transformation of CH3Cl and CH3OH could help decouple direct C–C bond formation routes from oxygenate-driven chain growth. However, the direct observation of short-lived active intermediates, such as ketene and methyl radicals, under operando conditions remains highly challenging because of the difficulty in discriminating them from stable spectator species due to the limited sensitivity of established methods. Advanced time-resolved spectroscopic techniques that can distinguish compounds present in low concentrations and distinct isomeric forms could provide new insights to help resolve some of the long-standing debates.
Herein, we analyse hydrocarbons desorbed from a representative H-ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst during MTH and MCTH processes using operando PEPICO spectroscopy under relevant reaction conditions. This technique has shed light on complex reaction networks35,36,37 and enables the quantitative, isomer-selective identification of all short- and long-lived species up to approximately C14 in size. By performing temperature-dependent studies, operando PEPICO enables the discrimination of primary and secondary intermediates and tertiary products. A complementary study of the used catalysts via electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)38,39 revealed distinctions in the representative molecular structure, density and distribution of the carbonaceous species deposited in the zeolite pore network. In combination with kinetic analysis, the adopted approach (Fig. 1) provides high molecular resolution of the species formed, enabling experimental verification of several open questions about the reaction mechanisms.
Evaluation of the reaction kinetics
Preliminary insights into the similarities and differences between MTH and MCTH processes were gained by studying the steady-state kinetics of the reactions over an H-ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst with a nominal Si/Al ratio of 40 under equivalent conditions (Fig. 2; Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). The reactivity was assessed by calculating the conversion (X(CH3X)) based on the concentration of CH3X at the reactor inlet and outlet. According to common practice, the reactivity in the MTH process was also evaluated considering both CH3OH and dimethyl ether ((CH3)2O) as reactants since an equilibrium is typically established between the two1. Since no (CH3)2O was observed at 100% conversion, recalculation of the conversion and product distribution does not alter the conclusions below (Fig. 2; Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). Both reactions showed a strong temperature dependence, and their light-off curves were found to be comparable, particularly when considering (CH3)2O as a reactant (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Fig. 2a). This points to similar kinetic behaviour of the MTH and MCTH reactions over H-ZSM-5, which contrasts with previous findings obtained over H-SAPO-34 zeolite catalysts11. In this study by Olsbye et al., lower conversions for the MCTH reaction were attributed to the rapid rupture of Si–O–Al bonds due to interaction with HCl. The similar conversions shown in our study suggest that the MFI-type framework of H-ZSM-5 offers higher stability11,33 and that the leaving group does not severely influence the intrinsic kinetics of MTH and MCTH. The products are reported in five main groups: CH4, C2–C4 olefins, C2–C4 alkanes, benzene–toluene–xylene (BTX) and other species, including C5+ hydrocarbons. At 673 K, while the generation of CH4, olefins and alkanes was similar, the formation of BTX was found more favoured in the MCTH process (52% selectivity) compared with MTH (38% selectivity). An opposite trend was observed for C5+ hydrocarbons, with selectivities of 4% and 12% for MCTH and MTH, respectively. Contrariwise, a rise in the reaction temperature (T) led to an increase in the formation of olefins at the expense of BTX in the MCTH process and especially in the MTH reaction (Supplementary Fig. 1a), which is consistent with other studies12,32. A stronger rise in CH4 generation was observed in MCTH compared with the MTH process, which suggests that a lower rate of trans-hydrogenation reactions in MCTH than in MTH is favoured by the presence of (CH3)2O (ref. 40). In line with the literature32, (CH3)2O, formed by the reversible dehydration of CH3OH, was not observed in the MTH reaction at 100% conversion. To extract additional kinetic information, the product distribution was also compared at approximately 65% CH3X conversion, which was achieved by adjusting the space velocity (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Under these conditions, a considerable amount of (CH3)2O was observed in the MTH process (27% selectivity). In addition, the formation of olefins and C5+ hydrocarbons was favoured at 65% conversion compared with full CH3X conversion at 673 K (olefin selectivity: 45% versus 26% for MTH, 40% versus 24% for MCTH; other selectivity: 14% versus 12% for MTH, 11% versus 4% for MCTH) at the expense of BTX (5% versus 38% for MTH, 35% versus 52% for MCTH). These common trends agree with the expected comparable mechanism of chain growth in the MTH and MCTH processes, in which olefins and C5+ hydrocarbons act as precursors for the formation of aromatic compounds.
Comparison of the time-dependent reactivity showed that full CH3X conversion could be maintained for 120 h in the MTH process (Fig. 2a,b). The product distribution remained virtually unaffected for the first 60 h on stream, although olefins increased from approximately 26% to 40% after 120 h in the MTH reaction at the expense of BTX (32% versus 28%) and C5+ hydrocarbons (30% versus 16%). By contrast, CH3Cl conversion gradually decreased to approximately 80% over the first 60 h before dropping more sharply to less than 20% after 120 h on stream. The product distribution also remained stable during the first 60 h, before BTX production decreased, ultimately reaching negligible production at the end of the run, while that of olefins increased. The used catalysts were characterized after selected times on stream in the MTH and MCTH processes to quantify the amount and location of carbonaceous coke species deposited and to confirm the effects of the reaction on the crystallinity and acidic properties of the H-ZSM-5 zeolite. Consistent with previous reports that have shown coking as a deactivation pathway in both reactions34,41,42, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) provided evidence of the accumulation of substantial carbonaceous deposits (up to 15 wt%) (Fig. 2c). Notably, coke accumulation was faster in the early stages of the MCTH process compared with MTH, which is in line with the higher tendency of this C1 platform molecule to generate BTX. However, the rate of coke deposition subsequently slowed and, after 120 h on stream, the coke content was slightly lower than in the catalyst used in the MTH reaction. This reduction in coking rate is consistent with the strong decrease in the production of BTX and C5+ hydrocarbons observed during the long-term test for the MCTH reaction (Fig. 2a,c), which have been identified as important classes of coke precursors41,42. A linear inverse correlation between the micropore volume and coke content was found (Fig. 2d). This indicates that carbonaceous species evolve and accumulate similarly within the pore network, despite the different rate of deposition, which is in line with the results from EPR (vide infra). X-ray diffraction patterns of the used zeolite catalysts after the oxidative removal of coke species showed no alteration of the crystal structure after either reaction (Supplementary Fig. 3). By contrast, the infrared spectroscopy study of adsorbed pyridine highlighted substantial changes in the acidic properties after the MCTH reaction, indicating decreased concentrations of Brønsted acid sites and increased concentrations of Lewis acid sites (Supplementary Table 1). These observations agree with previous reports on the impact of treatment with gaseous HCl-containing streams, a by-product formed in equimolar amounts in the MCTH process, on the zeolite properties33,34.
Paths for hydrocarbon formation
Operando PEPICO analysis enables us to obtain detailed insight into the intermediates and products formed in the reactions over H-ZSM-5 at relevant conditions (T ≤ 773 K, P ≤ 0.5 bar), showing a wide range of hydrocarbons (C1–C14) in the MTH and MCTH processes and of oxygenates (C1–C4) exclusively in the MTH reaction (Figs. 3–5; Supplementary Figs. 4–23). As detailed in the Supplementary Methods, the reactants and intermediates or products desorbed from the catalyst are detected via photoionization with monochromatic vacuum ultraviolet light. The photoions and photoelectrons generated are detected in coincidence, revealing their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) and their isomeric identity based on the photoion mass-selected threshold photoelectron (ms-TPE) spectrum. Two types of experiment were conducted for both reactions37. The first type used a packed bed of zeolite catalyst that permitted operation under near-ambient conditions (P = 0.5 bar) (Figs. 3 and 4; Supplementary Figs. 4–7, 14 and 17), whereas the second experiment used a zeolite-coated microreactor for low-pressure measurements (P = 0.05 bar) (Supplementary Figs. 8–11 and 15–17). Conversion estimates were obtained by normalizing the feed signals to a xenon (Xe) internal standard and comparing them with those obtained in blank experiments at the same temperature (90 and 65% for MTH or 50 and 35% for MCTH at near-ambient or low pressure, respectively). They confirmed the similar conditions in the operando PEPICO experiments to the kinetic tests, closing the gap between standard testing and operando measurements. Consistently, no significant deactivation was observed during the measurements. Blank measurements conducted using an empty reactor confirmed the absence of products in both reactions (Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13).
The near-ambient-pressure measurements confirmed the expected formation of major product groups, such as ethylene (C2H4), propylene (C3H6), BTX and other C4+ hydrocarbons, including C4H8 (m/z 56), C5H6 (m/z 66), C5H8 (m/z 68), C5H10 (m/z 70), C6H8 (m/z 80) and C7H10 (m/z 94) (Fig. 3; Supplementary Figs. 4–11). Extraction of the ms-TPE spectra showed that each of these compounds was present as a complex mixture of isomers, with varying degrees of branching and cyclization (Fig. 4; Supplementary Figs. 19 and 20). Oxygenates, including dimethyl ether ((CH3)2O; m/z 46), formaldehyde (CH2O; m/z 30) and acetaldehyde (CH3CHO; m/z 44) were detected in the MTH process (Figs. 3 and 4; Supplementary Figs. 5, 9 and 17). The most notable distinction in low-pressure experiments was the detection of a readily identifiable signal associated with methyl radicals (CH3•; m/z 15) and of their characteristic vibrational fingerprints in the corresponding ms-TPE spectra (Fig. 3; Supplementary Figs. 9, 11 and 16). The reduced pressure suppresses the quenching of this highly reactive species, enabling its observation. This experimentally confirms the presence of CH3• species in both MTH and MCTH reactions. The detection of CH3• radicals also at near-ambient pressure demonstrates that these species are reactive intermediates under realistic conditions rather than just minor desorption by-products from surface methoxy species or mere spectators (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. 18).
Signal integration at suitable photon energies enabled quantification of the relative abundance of distinct species as a function of temperature (Fig. 3; Supplementary Figs. 14–17). The increased generation of (CH3)2O in the MTH reaction and the higher olefin/BTX ratio in both reactions with decreasing conversion agrees well with the kinetic experiments. While BTX increased in the investigated temperature window in the near-ambient pressure experiments, the C3H6, C4H8 and C5H10 signal intensities reached a maximum at approximately 673 K, and the evolution of C5H8, C5H6, C6H8 and C7H10 peaked at around 723 K in both the MTH and MCTH reactions (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. 14). These observations support the presence of a consecutive mechanism in both reactions, where C5 compounds are central for chain growth, in line with previous hypotheses31. Conversely, the (CH3)2O signal decreased sharply with increasing temperature in the MTH process, while that of CH3CHO followed a volcano behaviour (Fig. 3). These results confirm the generation of (CH3)2O in the early stages of the MTH process via CH3OH dehydration, whereas CH3CHO is probably involved consecutively in the formation of the first C–C bond. By contrast, the formation of CH2O rose continuously with temperature. The same trend was observed in the low-pressure experiments in the MTH reaction, although the amount of CH2O generated was considerably higher (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. 17). This suggests that CH2O is predominantly involved in the first steps of the hydrocarbon evolution and not in the generation of coke precursors, in agreement with recent studies19,20.
On the basis of these findings, two main reaction pathways appear to be responsible for the first C–C bond formation and the subsequent chain growth to C5 compounds. The first involves the evolution of oxygenates, such as (CH3)2O and CH3CHO, and is only relevant in the MTH process (Fig. 4a), whereas the second encompasses olefins and occurs in both MTH and MCTH processes (Fig. 4b). In the oxygenate-driven mechanism, CH3OH probably initially undergoes dehydration to generate (CH3)2O. Calculations have shown that both CH3OH and (CH3)2O can react to CH2O, releasing H2 and CH4, respectively17,43,44. CH2O can be oxidized to carbon monoxide (CO) as demonstrated experimentally and theoretically15,17. Consistent with previous literature reports, carbon monoxide can react with adsorbed CH3OH, (CH3)2O or CH2O via Koch carbonylation to yield the ketene ethenone (C2H2O; m/z 42)25, which is assigned by its ionization transition at 9.6 eV in the m/z 42 ms-TPE spectrum (Fig. 4a). Although this intermediate had been previously predicted45, our data provide the experimental evidence of its formation and role in forming the first C–C bond in the MTH reaction. Its detection is highly challenging due to its high reactivity and the low activation barrier (≤17 kJ mol−1) for its coordination with Brønsted acid sites, generating readily observable surface-bound acetate or methyl acetate species1,19,23,45. In addition, C2H2O has the same integer mass as C3H6, which convolutes its identification solely via m/z analysis. The detection of gas-phase ketene strongly exemplifies the ability of operando PEPICO to discriminate reactive intermediates, either formed or released in the gas phase, from strongly bound species detected using conventional spectroscopic approaches, which are more likely to be spectators in the reaction mechanism. Reproportionation of C2H2O with CH3OH could yield CH3CHO and further CH2O, whose ionization transitions were detected via photoelectron analysis (Fig. 4a). CH3CHO may undergo aldol condensation to form crotonaldehyde (C4H6O; m/z 70), which has been discussed in the literature21. The unambiguous assignment of the crotonaldehyde vibrational fingerprints was not possible in this case, because it has the same integer mass as C5H10, an abundant and isomer-complex C5 species. Upon methylation and dehydration, this aldehyde may generate 1,3-pentadiene (C5H8; m/z 68) (Fig. 4a). Notably, CH2O can also react with CH3• to form CH3CHO. This represents another pathway to C–C bond formation, which is thermodynamically favoured compared with reported methane–formaldehyde (CH4–CH2O) mechanisms1.
In the second pathway, CH3X can dissociatively adsorb to form a CH3• radical and a coordinated leaving group, X* = Cl* or OH* (Fig. 4b). The creation of the first C–C bond then occurs via the reaction of two CH3• radicals to yield C2H4 upon dehydrogenation, analogous to the proposed direct coupling of surface methoxy species to form this olefin1. Chain growth proceeds via the addition of CH3• radicals, resulting in a distribution of C3H6, C4H8 and C5H10 isomers (Fig. 4b), explaining the complex ms-TPE spectra observed for C4H8 and C5H10 (Supplementary Fig. 19). Interestingly, the signals of isomerized and non-primary olefins were found to be stronger, which is in line with their higher thermodynamic stability compared with primary olefins. CH4 is formed via the hydrogenation of CH3•, whereas the CH3• radical–radical reaction results in C2H6, both products of the MTH and MCTH processes.
The different C5H8 isomers, which form either via the ketene-driven route in the MTH process or via hydrogen abstraction from C5H10 in the MTH and MCTH reactions, can undergo further cyclization/dehydrogenation and methylation to generate cyclopentadiene (C5H6; m/z 66) and methyl cyclopentadiene (C6H8; m/z 80), respectively, in both reactions (Fig. 4c; Supplementary Fig. 20). The detection of (poly)methylated cyclopentadienes corroborates studies that have discussed their involvement in the MTH mechanism and their potential role as further methylating agents1,46. Presumably, methyl-radical-driven and regular (that is, based on (poly)methylcyclopentadienes)46 methylation paths occur in parallel. Although it is not possible to distinguish the relative contributions of the two routes, due to their high reactivity, it is likely that CH3• radical species play an important role in the early stages of the reaction, and that once HCP species form they react indiscriminately in all steps. Photoelectron analysis detects the dehydrogenation product of methylcyclopentadienes (C6H8), that is, fulvene (C6H6; m/z 78), which generates benzene, the first aromatic ring compound, in a subsequent isomerization step (Fig. 4c; Supplementary Fig. 20). Direct methylation of fulvene as well as dehydrogenation–methylation of C6H8 yields methyl fulvene (C7H8; m/z 92), the principal precursor of toluene (Fig. 4c; Supplementary Fig. 20). This mechanism continues to generate other alkylated benzenes, such as isomers of xylene and of trimethylbenzene (Supplementary Fig. 21). Vibrational transitions in the ms-TPE spectra of m/z 106 could also be assigned to ethylbenzene, which can undergo cracking to yield C2H4 and C6H6, representing an additional source of olefins from the autocatalytic HCP pathway27. To gain further insight into this route, the following experiment was performed: after running the reaction under identical conditions to those reported in Fig. 3, the flow of reactants was stopped, the reactor flushed with argon (Ar) and the temperature increased while analysing the species evolved. C2H4 and C6H6 were observed throughout the tests in both the MTH and MCTH processes, while C3H6 was found to be almost negligible (Supplementary Fig. 23). This is in line with the occurrence of a second pathway to C2H4 and C6H6 that involves the cracking of alkylated benzenes1.
Coke generation and evolution
Further growth of the carbon skeleton leads to the formation of heavy carbonaceous species and ultimately to their deposition as coke in the zeolite pore network1,10,29,47. Understanding the generation and evolution of coke is essential to design efficient and robust catalytic technologies for converting C1 platform molecules into fine chemicals and fuels. To achieve this, we have combined operando PEPICO with EPR analyses, including continuous wave (CW), pulsed and two-dimensional hyperfine sublevel correlation (2D HYSCORE) measurements. By conducting operando PEPICO, a series of C10+ hydrocarbons were observed in both the MTH and MCTH processes at 0.5 bar (Fig. 5a). These species remained virtually unobserved in the low-pressure experiments, indicative of reduced chain-propagation and condensation-reaction rates. We identify two pathways to naphthalene (C10H8; m/z 128), which is considered to be the main precursor of heavier carbonaceous species (Fig. 5b). The first one involves a Diels–Alder dimerization of cyclopentadiene into dicyclopentadiene (C10H12; m/z 132), which isomerizes to 1,2,3,4- and 1,4,5,8-tetrahydronaphthalene, as observed in the MTH reaction. The latter species can undergo hydrogen abstraction to form dihydronaphthalene and ultimately naphthalene, as identified in both MTH and MCTH processes via ms-TPE spectrum analysis (Fig. 5b; Supplementary Fig. 22). This mechanism was first revealed in detail in the catalytic pyrolysis of benzenediols over H-ZSM-5 (ref. 48). In addition, dicyclopentadiene can hydrogenate and isomerize to adamantine, which can form diamantane, a known coke precursor49. The second pathway encompasses the reaction of benzene with propyne (C3H4; m/z 40) to yield indene (C9H8; m/z 116). This agrees with previous studies on ethanol coupling over H-ZSM-5 that have shown the generation of indene-like species using solvent extraction39. Further reaction with CH3• radicals generates naphthalene (Fig. 5b; Supplementary Fig. 22), following a known mechanism50. Interestingly, by comparing the ms-TPE spectra of m/z 132 photoions, the relative ratio of dicyclopentadiene and tetrahydronaphthalenes was lower in MCTH than in the MTH process (Fig. 5b; Supplementary Fig. 22). A possible explanation for this behaviour is the observed favoured production of aromatics in the MCTH reaction that could promote the indene-driven mechanism. Once naphthalene forms, it can undergo consecutive methylation to yield alkylated naphthalenes (Fig. 5a,b; Supplementary Fig. 22), which has been associated with the generation of heavy polyaromatic compounds26,49. This C1-addition mechanism agrees with experimental observations and kinetic models51,52. When switching off the feed of the MTH and MCTH reactions, the evolution of heavy species was also observed (Supplementary Fig. 23). In particular, photoions associated with naphthalene were detected after both MTH and MCTH processes, while indene and anthracene could also be identified to be released after the MCTH reaction. This is in line with the favoured generation of indene during the MCTH reaction as well as the higher rate of coke accumulation during the first 60 h on stream in the long-term tests.
The evolution of coke species was monitored by studying deposited paramagnetic carbonaceous species via EPR spectroscopy after selected times on stream in MTH and MCTH (Fig. 5c–h). By conducting CW EPR, a signal with an isotropic g factor of 2.003 was observed for all investigated samples (Supplementary Fig. 24). By applying a reported method for spin counting53, it was possible to quantify the specific amount of radicals formed during the reaction by comparing the double integrals of the EPR signals with a known standard. Accordingly, the average concentration of EPR-active carbonaceous species increased as a function of the time on stream, which is consistent with the coke contents determined via TGA, reaching approximately 4.5 and 7 μmol cm−3 after 120 h in the MTH and MCTH reactions, respectively (Fig. 5c). As detailed in Supplementary Note 2, information on the density of these species was obtained by extracting the Gaussian and Lorentzian lineshape contributions via least-squares fitting of the normalized CW EPR spectra (Fig. 5d, inset; Supplementary Figs. 24 and 25). Whereas isolated paramagnetic coke generally results in a Gaussian lineshape, the magnetic interactions of closely packed spins typically yield a Lorentzian-type linewidth. Accordingly, the MCTH reaction resulted in the formation of highly dense carbonaceous compounds within the first 5 h of reaction, whereas the density of these species grew slowly in the MTH reaction (Fig. 5d), consistent with the higher tendency of CH3Cl to generate BTX.
Pulsed relaxation EPR measurements, that is, recording the signal decay after microwave pulsing, were performed to further gain insight into the spatial distribution of the detected paramagnetic species (Supplementary Fig. 26). Through least-squares fitting of these decay data with a stretched exponential, the corresponding fractal dimension, N, can be extracted (Fig. 5e, inset). Generation of three-dimensional (3D) deposits (N ≥ 2.8) was observed after 5 h in the MCTH reaction, whereas N increased slowly in the MTH process, reaching 2.7 after 120 h on stream (Fig. 5e). These results indicate that highly packed carbonaceous species form rapidly in the MCTH process and equally along the three dimensions within the zeolite pore network. By contrast, the MTH reaction generates less-dense carbon deposits that grow more slowly, which is in line with the observations gathered using CW EPR, TGA and sorption analysis. Finally, 2D HYSCORE analyses provide further insights into the nature of these deposits (Fig. 5f,g; Supplementary Figs. 27–31). As detailed in Supplementary Note 2, comparison with density functional theory-based simulations and literature data enables the assignment of representative molecular structures to the recorded hyperfine couplings. Marked differences were observed after 2 h on stream in the MTH and MCTH processes, which showed the formation of ethylnaphthalene- and pentacene-like compounds, respectively (Fig. 5f,g). These results are in line with the PEPICO experiments performed by switching off the feed, in which naphthalene in both MTH and MCTH together with indene and anthracene in MCTH were evolved from the H-ZSM-5 catalyst (Supplementary Fig. 23). Notably, ethylnaphthalene was previously observed in ethanol coupling over H-ZSM-554, suggesting that the generation of coke precursors can be strongly influenced by the zeolite framework. Estimation of the corresponding H:C ratio indicates that species with a higher degree of alkylation are formed in the MTH process (Fig. 5h). The presence of the ketene-driven chain-growth route leads to the formation of linear compounds. This, together with the slower initial rate of carbonaceous species generation observed via CW EPR and TGA, can explain the reduced tendency of forming highly aromatic compounds in the MTH process compared with the MCTH reaction. The nature of the formed deposits converges with time on stream (Fig. 5h), and the representative molecular structure corresponds to alkylated coronenes and tribenzocoronenes after 60 and 120 h in both reactions (Supplementary Figs. 28 and 29).
The mechanism of C–C bond formation and chain propagation in the zeolite-catalysed coupling of CH3OH and CH3Cl was assessed using operando PEPICO spectroscopy, whose unique sensitivity enabled us to quantitatively and isomer-selectively map the generation of intermediates during the early stages of the MTH and MCTH processes. In addition, the strategy of jointly studying the activation of CH3OH and CH3Cl was crucial for decoupling and discriminating the oxygenate- and hydrocarbon-driven mechanisms. These results provide experimental evidence for the generation of CH3• radicals in both reactions and of C2H2O in the MTH process. Accordingly, two main C–C bond formation and propagation pathways are identified. The first, which is dominant in the MCTH process, involves the reaction of two CH3• radicals to generate C2H4 upon hydrogen transfer, which can undergo further methylation to yield complex isomer mixtures of C3–C5 hydrocarbons. The second occurs only in the MTH process and encompasses the CH3OH- and (CH3)2O-driven formation of CH2O, which, after oxidation into CO, can undergo Koch carbonylation to generate C2H2O, representing the first C–C bond generation in the MTH process. This ketene can reproportionate in the presence of CH3OH to yield CH2O and CH3CHO. The latter can undergo aldol condensation into crotonaldehyde, which, upon methylation and dehydration, generates linear C5H8. Interestingly, CH2O can react with a CH3• radical to generate CH3CHO, which is thermodynamically favoured compared with proposed CH4–CH2O routes and represents an additional subroute for formation of the first C–C bond in the MTH reaction1. Both envisioned pathways converge to generate linear and branched C5 hydrocarbons, such as C5H10 and C5H8. Following a series of methylation, cyclization and hydrogen-transfer reactions, these compounds form fulvene and methyl fulvenes that isomerize to yield benzene and toluene, respectively.
Operando PEPICO spectroscopy also provided insights into the mechanisms for the generation of coke precursors, such as naphthalene and its methylated analogues, in MTH and MCTH. The first involves Diels–Alder dimerization, isomerization and hydrogen abstraction of cyclopentadiene, whereas the second encompasses coupling between propyne and benzene to yield indene, which forms naphthalene upon methylation. These results were further complemented with EPR measurements that shed light on the density, spatial distribution and representative molecular structure of the carbonaceous species deposited in the zeolite micropores during the MTH and MCTH reactions. By combining CW and pulsed EPR with 2D HYSCORE measurements, it could be observed that the MCTH process results in the fast generation of high-density, three-dimensional and low-alkylated carbon deposits, whereas carbonaceous species grow more slowly and form highly alkylated aromatics in the MTH process, particularly after a short time on stream. However, the degree of alkylation of these deposits gradually decreased with time on stream in the MTH reaction until it converged with that obtained in the MCTH reaction after around 60 h.
Determining the different pathways of C–C bond formation and chain propagation that culminate in the generation of carbonaceous species has important practical implications for the design of catalytic and reactor systems for CH3OH and CH3Cl coupling, and should favour oxygenate-driven routes to hinder the formation of dense polyaromatic species for developing efficient and robust catalytic technologies. On the basis of the map of reactive intermediates obtained via the operando analysis in this work, we have proposed a specific reactivity map for those intermediates; further studies will undoubtedly provide additional insight that will help to refine further our understanding of the actual reaction network. Going forward, these techniques provide a valuable platform, potentially in combination with co-feeding experiments, for gaining insights into other long-standing questions in hydrocarbon transformations, for example, to confirm the effects of promoters or reactant leaving groups, distinguishing mere spectators from real reaction intermediates, and could be applied to virtually all hydrocarbon functionalization processes.
Catalyst synthesis and basic characterization
A commercial ZSM-5 zeolite (CBV 8014 from Zeolyst International, nominal Si/Al = 40, ammonium form) was calcined at 823 K (5 K min−1) for 5 h to obtain the protonic form. The crystalline order, porous and acidic properties, and the presence of coke in the fresh and used catalysts were characterized using powder X-ray diffraction, gas sorption at 77 K, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of adsorbed pyridine, and TGA, respectively. Full details are provided in the Supplementary Methods.
Methanol and methyl chloride coupling reactions were performed at ambient pressure using a continuous-flow fixed-bed reactor setup (Supplementary Fig. 32). In a typical test, the zeolite catalyst (catalyst weight, Wcat = 0.6 g) was loaded in a quartz microreactor and pre-treated at 673 K for 1 h before switching to the desired reaction temperature. Thereafter, a total gas flow, FT = 20 cm3 STP min−1, containing 50 vol% of CH3X (X = OH or Cl) in helium, was fed into the reactor at the desired reaction temperature (T = 523–723 K). Quantification of the reactant conversion and product selectivity, as well as the error in the carbon mass balance, was conducted according to the protocols described in the Supplementary Methods.
Operando photoelectron photoion coincidence spectroscopy
PEPICO experiments were performed using the CRF-PEPICO endstation at the vacuum ultraviolet beamline of the Swiss Light Source of the Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland55,56,57. The unique reactor configuration extends the lifetime of elusive reaction intermediates, thanks to the high dilution of the feed, the low pressure inside the reactor (around 0.05–0.5 bar) and the free jet molecular beam expansion, enabling their detection (Supplementary Fig. 33). Full details of the protocol are provided in the Supplementary Methods.
Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy
The evolution of coke with the time on stream was monitored using ex situ EPR spectroscopy. A set of experiments, including CW, pulsed and 2D HYSCORE measurements, was carried out to investigate the distinctive features of the deposited carbonaceous species, such as the density, spatial distribution and representative molecular structure (Supplementary Fig. 34). Full details of the protocol are provided in the Supplementary Methods.
Data presented in the main figures of the manuscript are publicly available through the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6547649). Further data supporting the findings of this study are available in the Supplementary Information. All other relevant source data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Yarulina, I., Chowdhury, A. D., Meirer, F., Weckhuysen, B. M. & Gascon, J. Recent trends and fundamental insights in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Nat. Catal. 1, 398–411 (2018).
Van Speybroeck, V. et al. First principle chemical kinetics in zeolites: the methanol-to-olefin process as a case study. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 7326–7357 (2014).
Tian, P., Wei, Y., Ye, M. & Liu, Z. Methanol to olefins (MTO): from fundamentals to commercialization. ACS Catal. 5, 1922–1938 (2015).
Olivos-Suarez, A. I. et al. Strategies for the direct catalytic valorization of methane using heterogeneous catalysis: challenges and opportunities. ACS Catal. 6, 2965–2981 (2016).
Čejka, J., Centi, G., Perez-Pariente, J. & Roth, W. J. Zeolite-based materials for novel catalytic applications: opportunities, perspectives and open problems. Catal. Today 179, 2–15 (2012).
Zichittella, G. & Pérez-Ramírez, J. Status and prospects of the decentralised valorisation of natural gas into energy and energy carriers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 2984–3012 (2021).
Zhong, J. et al. State of the art and perspectives in heterogeneous catalysis of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 1385–1413 (2020).
Ilias, S. & Bhan, A. Mechanism of the catalytic conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons. ACS Catal. 3, 18–31 (2012).
Olsbye, U. et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls product selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5810–5831 (2012).
Olsbye, U. et al. The formation and degradation of active species during methanol conversion over protonated zeotype catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 7155–7176 (2015).
Olsbye, U. et al. Methane conversion to light olefins—how does the methyl halide route differ from the methanol-to-olefins (MTO) route? Catal. Today 171, 211–220 (2011).
Lin, R., Amrute, A. P. & Pérez-Ramírez, J. Halogen-mediated conversion of hydrocarbons to commodities. Chem. Rev. 117, 4182–4247 (2017).
Yarulina, I. et al. Structure–performance descriptors and the role of Lewis acidity in the methanol-to-propylene process. Nat. Chem. 10, 804–812 (2018).
Wu, X. et al. Direct mechanism of the first carbon–carbon bond formation in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 9039–9043 (2017).
Liu, Y. et al. Formation mechanism of the first carbon–carbon bond and the first olefin in the methanol conversion into hydrocarbons. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 5723–5726 (2016).
Comas-Vives, A., Valla, M., Coperet, C. & Sautet, P. Cooperativity between Al sites promotes hydrogen transfer and carbon–carbon bond formation upon dimethyl ether activation on alumina. ACS Cent. Sci. 1, 313–319 (2015).
Plessow, P. N. & Studt, F. Unraveling the mechanism of the initiation reaction of the methanol to olefins process using ab initio and DFT calculations. ACS Catal. 7, 7987–7994 (2017).
Wang, C.-M., Wang, Y.-D., Du, Y.-J., Yang, G. & Xie, Z.-K. Computational insights into the reaction mechanism of methanol-to-olefins conversion in H-ZSM-5: nature of hydrocarbon pool. Catal. Sci. Technol. 6, 3279–3288 (2016).
Liu, Y. et al. Critical role of formaldehyde during methanol conversion to hydrocarbons. Nat. Commun. 10, 1462 (2019).
Wen, W. et al. Formation and fate of formaldehyde in methanol-to-hydrocarbon reaction: in situ synchrotron radiation photoionization mass spectrometry study. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 4873–4878 (2020).
Yang, L. et al. Role of acetaldehyde in the roadmap from initial carbon–carbon bonds to hydrocarbons during methanol conversion. ACS Catal. 9, 6491–6501 (2019).
Wang, C. et al. Extra-framework aluminum-assisted initial C–C bond formation in methanol-to-olefins conversion on zeolite H-ZSM-5. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 10197–10201 (2018).
Chowdhury, A. D. et al. Initial carbon–carbon bond formation during the early stages of the methanol-to-olefin process proven by zeolite-trapped acetate and methyl acetate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 15840–15845 (2016).
Hemelsoet, K., Van der Mynsbrugge, J., De Wispelaere, K., Waroquier, M. & Van Speybroeck, V. Unraveling the reaction mechanisms governing methanol-to-olefins catalysis by theory and experiment. ChemPhysChem 14, 1526–1545 (2013).
Chowdhury, A. D. et al. Bridging the gap between the direct and hydrocarbon pool mechanisms of the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 8095–8099 (2018).
Lezcano-Gonzalez, I. et al. Insight into the effects of confined hydrocarbon species on the lifetime of methanol conversion catalysts. Nat. Mater. 19, 1081–1087 (2020).
Wang, C. et al. Methylbenzene hydrocarbon pool in methanol-to-olefins conversion over zeolite H-ZSM-5. J. Catal. 332, 127–137 (2015).
Li, J. et al. A route to form initial hydrocarbon pool species in methanol conversion to olefins over zeolites. J. Catal. 317, 277–283 (2014).
Müller, S. et al. Coke formation and deactivation pathways on H-ZSM-5 in the conversion of methanol to olefins. J. Catal. 325, 48–59 (2015).
Wang, S. et al. Origin and evolution of the initial hydrocarbon pool intermediates in the transition period for the conversion of methanol to olefins over H-ZSM-5 zeolite. J. Catal. 369, 382–395 (2019).
Hu, M. et al. Establishing a link between the dual cycles in methanol-to-olefins conversion on H-ZSM-5: aromatization of cycloalkenes. ACS Catal. 10, 4299–4305 (2020).
Valecillos, J., Manzano, H., Aguayo, A. T., Bilbao, J. & Castaño, P. Kinetic and deactivation differences among methanol, dimethyl ether and chloromethane as stock for hydrocarbons. ChemCatChem 11, 5444–5456 (2019).
Paunović, V., Mitchell, S., Verel, R., Lee, S. S. & Pérez-Ramírez, J. Aluminum redistribution in ZSM-5 zeolite upon interaction with gaseous halogens and hydrogen halides and implications in catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 722–733 (2019).
Ibáñez, M. et al. Simultaneous coking and dealumination of zeolite H-ZSM-5 during the transformation of chloromethane into olefins. Catal. Sci. Technol. 6, 296–306 (2016).
Zichittella, G., Hemberger, P., Holzmeier, F., Bodi, A. & Perez-Ramirez, J. Operando photoelectron photoion coincidence spectroscopy unravels mechanistic fingerprints of propane activation by catalytic oxyhalogenation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 856–863 (2020).
Hemberger, P., Custodis, V. B. F., Bodi, A., Gerber, T. & van Bokhoven, J. A. Understanding the mechanism of catalytic fast pyrolysis by unveiling reactive intermediates in heterogeneous catalysis. Nat. Commun. 8, 15946 (2017).
Hemberger, P., van Bokhoven, J. A., Pérez-Ramírez, J. & Bodi, A. New analytical tools for advanced mechanistic studies in catalysis: photoionization and photoelectron photoion coincidence spectroscopy. Catal. Sci. Technol. 10, 1975–1990 (2020).
Brückner, A. In situ electron paramagnetic resonance: a unique tool for analyzing structure–reactivity relationships in heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 4673–4684 (2010).
Madeira, F. F. et al. Radical species detection and their nature evolution with catalyst deactivation in the ethanol-to-hydrocarbon reaction over HZSM-5 zeolite. ACS Catal. 1, 417–424 (2011).
Martinez-Espin, J. S. et al. New insights into catalyst deactivation and product distribution of zeolites in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons (MTH) reaction with methanol and dimethyl ether feeds. Catal. Sci. Technol. 7, 2700–2716 (2017).
Foley, B. L., Johnson, B. A. & Bhan, A. A method for assessing catalyst deactivation: a case study on methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion. ACS Catal. 9, 7065–7072 (2019).
Palumbo, L. et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: spectroscopic characterization of carbonaceous species formed over H-ZSM-5. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 9710–9716 (2008).
Zang, Z., Zhang, W., Huang, J., Feng, P. & Ding, J. First molecule with carbon–carbon bond in methanol-to-olefins process. Chem. Phys. Lett. 737, 136844 (2019).
Plessow, P. N., Smith, A., Tischer, S. & Studt, F. Identification of the reaction sequence of the MTO initiation mechanism using ab initio-based kinetics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 5908–5915 (2019).
Chowdhury, A. D. & Gascon, J. The curious case of ketene in zeolite chemistry and catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 14982–14985 (2018).
Zhang, W. et al. Methylcyclopentenyl cations linking initial stage and highly efficient stage in methanol-to-hydrocarbon process. ACS Catal. 10, 4510–4516 (2020).
Bleken, F. L. et al. Catalyst deactivation by coke formation in microporous and desilicated zeolite H-ZSM-5 during the conversion of methanol-to-hydrocarbons. J. Catal. 307, 62–73 (2013).
Pan, Z., Puente-Urbina, A., Bodi, A., van Bokhoven, J. A. & Hemberger, P. Isomer-dependent catalytic pyrolysis mechanism of the lignin model compounds catechol, resorcinol and hydroquinone. Chem. Sci. 12, 3161–3169 (2021).
Goetze, J. et al. Insights into the activity and deactivation of the methanol-to-olefins process over different small-pore zeolites as studied with operando UV-vis spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 7, 4033–4046 (2017).
Mebel, A. M., Landera, A. & Kaiser, R. I. Formation mechanisms of naphthalene and indene: from the interstellar medium to combustion flames. J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 901–926 (2017).
Rojo-Gama, D. et al. Deactivation of zeolite catalyst H-ZSM-5 during conversion of methanol to gasoline: operando time- and space-resolved X-ray diffraction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1324–1328 (2018).
Janssens, T. V. W., Svelle, S. & Olsbye, U. Kinetic modeling of deactivation profiles in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons (MTH) reaction: a combined autocatalytic–hydrocarbon pool approach. J. Catal. 308, 122–130 (2013).
Zichittella, G., Polyhach, Y., Tschaggelar, R., Jeschke, G. & Pérez-Ramírez, J. Quantification of redox sites during catalytic propane oxychlorination by operando EPR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 3596–3602 (2021).
Ben Tayeb, K. et al. The radical internal coke structure as a fingerprint of the zeolite framework. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 289, 109617 (2019).
Sztáray, B. et al. CRF-PEPICO: double velocity map imaging photoelectron photoion coincidence spectroscopy for reaction kinetics studies. J. Chem. Phys. 147, 013944 (2017).
Bodi, A., Sztáray, B., Baer, T., Johnson, M. & Gerber, T. Data acquisition schemes for continuous two-particle time-of-flight coincidence experiments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 084102 (2007).
Bodi, A. et al. Imaging photoelectron photoion coincidence spectroscopy with velocity focusing electron optics. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 034101 (2009).
This publication was created as part of NCCR Catalysis (grant 180544), a National Centre of Competence in Research funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The operando PEPICO measurements were performed at the VUV beamline of the Swiss Light Source (SLS) located at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Catalysis thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Cesarini, A., Mitchell, S., Zichittella, G. et al. Elucidation of radical- and oxygenate-driven paths in zeolite-catalysed conversion of methanol and methyl chloride to hydrocarbons. Nat Catal 5, 605–614 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00808-0
This article is cited by
Nature Catalysis (2022)