Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reply to: Practical constraints on atmospheric methane removal

The Original Article was published on 23 March 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Lackner, K. S. et al. Capture of carbon dioxide from ambient air. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 176, 93–106 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lackner, K. S. Practical constraints on atmospheric methane removal. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0496-7 (2020).

  3. Jackson, R. B., Solomon, E. I., Canadell, J. G., Cargnello, M. & Field, C. B. Methane removal and atmospheric restoration. Nat. Sustain. 2, 436–438 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global Carbon Budget 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1783–1838 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2012. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 8, 697–751 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prather, M. J. et al. Measuring and modeling the lifetime of nitrous oxide including its variability. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 5693–5705 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan, X., Kang, S., Li, J. & Zhu, T. Conversion of dilute nitrous oxide (N2O) in N2 and N2–O2 mixtures by plasma and plasma-catalytic processes. RSC Adv. 8, 26998–27007 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the ideas expressed in the paper. R.B.J. drafted the initial response.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert B. Jackson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackson, R.B., Solomon, E.I., Canadell, J.G. et al. Reply to: Practical constraints on atmospheric methane removal. Nat Sustain 3, 358–359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0498-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0498-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing