Sustainable development goals connect policies addressing air quality and energy efficiency with complementary benefits for climate mitigation. However, a typically fragmented approach across these domains hinders effectiveness in addressing short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs)—including methane, carbon monoxide, non-methane volatile organic compounds and black carbon—to supplement CO2 mitigation. Here, to support policy coordination in India, we assess climate co-benefits of air quality and clean energy policies, using multiple metrics (global warming and temperature change potentials). We estimate an emission reduction potential of −0.1 to −1.8 GtCO2e yr−1 in 2030. The largest benefits accrue from residential clean energy policy (biomass cooking) and air pollution regulation (curbing brick production and agricultural residue burning emissions), which cut black carbon. In the next 1–2 decades (using global warming potential—GWP20), emission reduction potentials of warming SLCFs exceed those of CO2, which is not evident on longer timescales. Concurrently, policies in the electricity generation and transport sectors reduce cooling SLCFs (SO2 and NOx), potentially unmasking 0.1–2.4 GtCO2e yr−1. Integrating these interventions into national climate policies can strengthen both climate action and sustainability. The crucial impact of black carbon suggests that it should be included in the international climate accord.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Dubash, N., Raghunandan, D., Sant, G. & Sreenivas, A. Indian climate change policy: exploring a co-benefits based approach. Econ. Polit. Wkly 48, 47–62 (2013).
National Action Plan on Climate Change (Government of India, 2008).
IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018); http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/
Blain, D. et al. (eds) Short-Lived Climate Forcers (SLCF) (IPCC, 2018); https://go.nature.com/3mukboM
Bond, T. C. Can warming particles enter global climate discussions? Environ. Res. Lett. 2, 045030 (2007).
Shindell, D. et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 335, 183–189 (2012).
Shindell, D. et al. A climate policy pathway for near- and long-term benefits. Science 356, 493–494 (2017).
Bowerman, N. H. A. et al. The role of short-lived climate pollutants in meeting temperature goals. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 1021–1024 (2013).
Hu, A., Xu, Y., Tebaldi, C., Washington, W. M. & Ramanathan, V. Mitigation of short-lived climate pollutants slows sea-level rise. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 730–734 (2013).
Partanen, A.-I., Landry, J.-S. & Matthews, H. D. Climate and health implications of future aerosol emission scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 024028 (2018).
Shindell, D. & Smith, C. J. Climate and air-quality benefits of a realistic phase-out of fossil fuels. Nature 573, 408–411 (2019).
Mondal, A., Sah, N., Sharma, A., Venkataraman, C. & Patil, N. Absorbing aerosols and high‐temperature extremes in India: a general circulation modelling study. Int. J. Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6783 (2020).
Dave, P., Bhushan, M. & Venkataraman, C. Absorbing aerosol influence on temperature maxima: An observation based study over India. Atmos. Environ. 223, 117237 (2020).
Modalities, Procedures and Guidelines for the Transparency Framework for Action and Support Referred to in Article 13 of the Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2018); https://unfccc.int/node/187431
Decision IPCC-XLIX-7 (IPCC, accessed 7 October 2020); https://go.nature.com/2Jz5Ngs
Allen, M. R. et al. New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 773–776 (2016).
Tanaka, K., Cavalett, O., Collins, W. J. & Cherubini, F. Asserting the climate benefits of the coal-to-gas shift across temporal and spatial scales. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 389–396 (2019).
Venkataraman, C. et al. Source influence on emission pathways and ambient PM2.5 pollution over India (2015–2050). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 8017–8039 (2018).
Peng, W., Yang, J., Wagner, F. & Mauzerall, D. L. Substantial air quality and climate co-benefits achievable now with sectoral mitigation strategies in China. Sci. Total Environ. 598, 1076–1084 (2017).
Stohl, A. et al. Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 10529–10566 (2015).
Markandya, A. et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: low-carbon electricity generation. Lancet 374, 2006–2015 (2009).
Mittal, S., Hanaoka, T., Shukla, P. R. & Masui, T. Air pollution co-benefits of low carbon policies in road transport: a sub-national assessment for India. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 85006 (2015).
Pathak, M. & Shukla, P. R. Co-benefits of low carbon passenger transport actions in Indian cities: Case study of Ahmedabad. Transp. Res. D 44, 303–316 (2016).
Rao, S. et al. A multi-model assessment of the co-benefits of climate mitigation for global air quality. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 124013 (2016).
Murata, A. et al. Environmental co-benefits of the promotion of renewable power generation in China and India through clean development mechanisms. Renew. Energy 87, 120–129 (2016).
Dhar, S., Pathak, M. & Shukla, P. R. Electric vehicles and India’s low carbon passenger transport: a long-term co-benefits assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 146, 139–148 (2017).
Reynolds, C. C. O. & Kandlikar, M. Climate impacts of air quality policy: switching to a natural gas-fueled public transportation system in New Delhi. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 5860–5865 (2008).
Grieshop, A. P., Marshall, J. D. & Kandlikar, M. Health and climate benefits of cookstove replacement options. Energy Policy 39, 7530–7542 (2011).
Jiang, P. et al. Analysis of the co-benefits of climate change mitigation and air pollution reduction in China. J. Clean. Prod. 58, 130–137 (2013).
Nam, K.-M., Waugh, C. J., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J. M. & Karplus, V. J. Carbon co-benefits of tighter SO2 and NOx regulations in China. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1648–1661 (2013).
Air Pollution in Asia and the Pacific: Science-based Solutions (United Nations Environment Programme, 2019).
Maji, P. & Kandlikar, M. Quantifying the air quality, climate and equity implications of India’s household energy transition. Energy Sustain. Dev. 55, 37–47 (2020).
GBD MAPS Working Group Burden of Disease Attributable to Major Air Pollution Sources in India Special Report 21 (Health Effects Institute, 2018).
Burney, J. & Ramanathan, V. Recent climate and air pollution impacts on Indian agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16319–16324 (2014).
India’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC): Working Towards Climate Justice (UNFCCC, 2015); https://go.nature.com/2JyBeaT
Venkataraman, C., Ghosh, S. & Kandlikar, M. Breaking out of the box: India and climate action on short-lived climate pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 12527–12529 (2016).
Haines, A. et al. Short-lived climate pollutant mitigation and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 863–869 (2017).
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Notification S.O. 3305(E). The Gazette of India (Government of India, 2015); https://go.nature.com/36v0KqA
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. Government decides to directly shift from BS-IV to BS-VI emission norms. Press Information Bureau (Government of India, 2016). http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=134232
Fry, M. M. et al. The influence of ozone precursor emissions from four world regions on tropospheric composition and radiative climate forcing. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117, D07306 (2012).
Collins, W. J. et al. Global and regional temperature-change potentials for near-term climate forcers. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 2471–2485 (2013).
Wild, O., Prather, M. J. & Akimoto, H. Indirect long-term global radiative cooling from NOx emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 1719–1722 (2001).
Dagnet, Y., Cogswell, N., Bird, N., Bouyé, M. & Rocha, M. Building Capacity for the Paris Agreement’s Enhanced Transparency Framework: What Can We Learn from Countries’ Experiences and UNFCCC Processes? (World Resources Institute, 2019).
Baker, L. H. et al. Climate responses to anthropogenic emissions of short-lived climate pollutants. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 8201–8216 (2015).
Lelieveld, J. et al. Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7192–7197 (2019).
The Emissions Gap Report 2017 (United Nations Environment Programme, 2017).
Grieshop, A. P., Reynolds, C. C. O., Kandlikar, M. & Dowlatabadi, H. A black-carbon mitigation wedge. Nat. Geosci. 2, 533–534 (2009).
Bond, T. C. et al. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 5380–5552 (2013).
Berntsen, T., Tanaka, K. & Fuglestvedt, J. S. Does black carbon abatement hamper CO2 abatement? Clim. Change 103, 627–633 (2010).
Stjern, C. W. et al. Rapid adjustments cause weak surface temperature response to increased black carbon concentrations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 462–481 (2017).
Smith, C. J. et al. Understanding rapid adjustments to diverse forcing agents. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 12,023–12,031 (2018).
Takemura, T. & Suzuki, K. Weak global warming mitigation by reducing black carbon emissions. Sci. Rep. 9, 4419 (2019).
Samset, B. H. & Myhre, G. Climate response to externally mixed black carbon as a function of altitude. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 2913–2927 (2015).
Matsui, H., Hamilton, D. S. & Mahowald, N. M. Black carbon radiative effects highly sensitive to emitted particle size when resolving mixing-state diversity. Nat. Commun. 9, 3446 (2018).
Ministry of External Affairs India–France Joint Statement on Visit of Prime Minister to France (22–23 August 2019) (Government of India, 2019); https://go.nature.com/37xNil4
Cain, M. et al. Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2, 29 (2019).
Lynch, J., Cain, M., Pierrehumbert, R. & Allen, M. Demonstrating GWP*: a means of reporting warming-equivalent emissions that captures the contrasting impacts of short- and long-lived climate pollutants. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 044023 (2020).
Allen, M. R. et al. A solution to the misrepresentations of CO2-equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 1, 16 (2018).
Collins, W. J., Frame, D. J., Fuglestvedt, J. S. & Shine, K. P. Stable climate metrics for emissions of short and long-lived species—combining steps and pulses. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 024018 (2020).
Halsnæs, K. et al. in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Metz, B. et al.) Ch. 2 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 658–740 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Fuglestvedt, J. S. et al. Metrics of climate change: assessing radiative forcing and emission indices. Clim. Change 58, 267–331 (2003).
Shine, K. P., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Hailemariam, K. & Stuber, N. Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Clim. Change 68, 281–302 (2005).
Shine, K. P., Berntsen, T. K., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Skeie, R. B. & Stuber, N. Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short- and long-lived climate agents. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 1903–1914 (2007).
Scientific Advisory Panel Science Advisory Panel Report On Metrics and Inventory Development Workshop (Climate and Clean Air Coalition, 2017).
Kupiainen, K. J., Aamaas, B., Savolahti, M., Karvosenoja, N. & Paunu, V.-V. Climate impact of Finnish air pollutants and greenhouse gases using multiple emission metrics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 7743–7757 (2019).
Ocko, I. B. et al. Unmask temporal trade-offs in climate policy debates. Science 356, 492–493 (2017).
Iordan, C., Lausselet, C. & Cherubini, F. Life-cycle assessment of a biogas power plant with application of different climate metrics and inclusion of near-term climate forcers. J. Environ. Manag. 184, 517–527 (2016).
Edwards, M. R. et al. Vehicle emissions of short-lived and long-lived climate forcers: trends and tradeoffs. Faraday Discuss. 200, 453–474 (2017).
Levasseur, A. et al. Enhancing life cycle impact assessment from climate science: review of recent findings and recommendations for application to LCA. Ecol. Indic. 71, 163–174 (2016).
Åström, S. & Johansson, D. J. A. The choice of climate metric is of limited importance when ranking options for abatement of near-term climate forcers. Clim. Change 154, 401–416 (2019).
Yu, H. et al. A multimodel assessment of the influence of regional anthropogenic emission reductions on aerosol direct radiative forcing and the role of intercontinental transport. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 700–720 (2013).
This work was supported by the Indian Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change under the NCAP-COALESCE project (Grant No.14/10/2014-CC(Vol.II)). We thank the internal review committee of the NCAP-COALESCE project for their comments and suggestions on this paper. The views expressed in this document are solely those of authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ministry. The ministry does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Sustainability thanks Myles Allen and Katsumasa Tanaka for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Clean technology fraction for various interventions under climate, air quality and clean energy programs respectively in 2030 under three scenarios. One reference (REF) scenario with policies fixed at 2015 levels, while two mitigation scenarios comprising different levels of achievement of declared targets from ongoing national programs—a) Conservative (CON)—50% achievement and Ambitious (AMB) – 100% achievement. The abbreviated programs are as follows, i) Climate programs: Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC – shifts to renewable power generation), National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC – shifts to higher efficiency boilers), National Electricity Plan (NEP – Emissions standards for thermal power plants promoting FGD), Perform Achieve and Trade Scheme (PAT – energy conservation in industries), National Solar Mission (NSM – shifts to solar operated devices); ii) Air quality programs: Brick emission standards 2018 (BRC_ES18 – shifts to zigzag-fired bricks), Transport emission standards 2016 (TRA_ES16 – shifts to BS-VI norms), National Electric Mobility Mission (NEMM – shifts to electric vehicles), National Policy for Management of Crop Residue (NPMCR – ban on agricultural residue burning); iii) Clean energy programs: Biomass gasifiers for industries (BGI – gasifiers for informal industries), Prime Minister Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY – shifts to LPG cooking), Saubhagya Scheme (SAU – household electrification).
Emission reduction potential of CO2 and net SLCF emissions (in GtCO2-e yr−1) by different programs using GWP20/GWP100/GTP100 in Conservative (CON) and Ambitious (AMB) scenarios. The abbreviated programs are as follows, i) Climate programs: National Solar Mission (NSM—shifts to solar operated devices), Perform Achieve and Trade Scheme (PAT—energy conservation in industries), National Electricity Plan (NEP—gas-based power, FGD), Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC—shifts to renewable power generation), National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC—shifts to higher efficiency boilers); ii) Air quality programs: Brick emission standards 2018 (BRC_ES18—shifts to zigzag-fired bricks), National Policy for Management of Crop Residue (NPMCR—ban on agricultural residue burning), Transport emission standards 2016 (TRA_ES16—shifts to BS-VI norms), National Electric Mobility Mission (NEMM—shifts to electric vehicles); iii) Clean energy programs: Saubhagya Scheme (SAU—households electrification), Prime Minister Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY—shifts to LPG cooking). The error bars indicate uncertainty arising from metrics as ± 1σ around the mean.
About this article
Cite this article
Tibrewal, K., Venkataraman, C. Climate co-benefits of air quality and clean energy policy in India. Nat Sustain 4, 305–313 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00666-3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2021)
Science Advances (2021)