Cities increasingly use real-time control of combined sewer systems and green infrastructure to decrease emissions to surface waters, and incorporate infrastructure into the urban landscape to reduce flooding from short, intense rainfall events called cloudbursts, which can cause flash flooding. Inspired by the ‘smart cities’ agenda, we propose the use of integrated stormwater inflow control to dynamically activate cloudburst conveyance infrastructure in the urban landscape as well as green storage elements more often than originally intended. This control facilitates synergy between sewers, green infrastructure and the urban landscape, and has lower environmental impacts than isolated control approaches. A simulated, yet realistic, case study in Copenhagen, Denmark, shows that combined sewage emissions can be eliminated or reduced substantially in this manner. Other potential benefits include increasing amenity value and educating citizens, for example. The results suggest that the proposed control concept potentially provides a viable path towards more resilient, liveable and sustainable cities.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Scientific Reports Open Access 19 October 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
IPCC Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
Georgeson, L., Maslin, M., Poessinouw, M. & Howard, S. Adaptation responses to climate change differ between global megacities. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 584–589 (2016).
Hutton, G., Haller, L. & Bartram, J. Global cost-benefit analysis of water supply and sanitation interventions. J. Water Health 5, 481–502 (2007).
Chocat, B. et al. Toward the sustainable management of urban storm-water. Indoor Built Environ. 16, 273–285 (2007).
Fletcher, T. D. et al. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more—the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J. 12, 525–542 (2015).
Lund, N., Falk, A. K., Borup, M., Madsen, H. & Mikkelsen, P. S. Model predictive control of urban drainage systems: a review and per-spective towards smart real-time water management. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 279–339 (2018).
Semadeni-Davies, A., Hernebring, C., Svensson, G. & Gustafsson, L.-G. The impacts of climate change and urbanisation on drainage in Helsingborg, Sweden: combined sewer system. J. Hydrol. 350, 100–113 (2008).
Eriksson, E. et al. Selected stormwater priority pollutants—a European perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 383, 41–51 (2007).
Young, A., Kochenkov, V., McIntyre, J. K., Stark, J. D. & Coffin, A. B. Urban stormwater runoff negatively impacts lateral line develop-ment in larval zebrafish and salmon embryos. Sci. Rep. 8, 2830 (2018).
van Bijnen, M., Korving, H., Langeveld, J. & Clemens, F. Quantitative impact assessment of sewer condition on health risk. Water 10, 245 (2018).
Mark, O. et al. A new methodology for modelling of health risk from urban flooding exemplified by cholera—Case Dhaka, Bangladesh. J. Flood Risk Manage. 11, 28–42 (2015).
Casadio, A., Maglionico, M., Bolognesi, A. & Artina, S. Toxicity and pollutant impact analysis in an urban river due to combined sewer overflows loads. Water Sci. Technol. 61, 207–215 (2010).
Eganhouse, R. P. & Sherblom, P. M. Anthropogenic organic contaminants in the effluent of a combined sewer overflow: impact on Boston Harbor. Mar. Environ. Res. 51, 51–74 (2001).
Even, S. et al. Modelling the impacts of combined sewer overflows on the river Seine water quality. Sci. Total Environ. 375, 140–151 (2007).
Phillips, P. J. et al. Combined sewer overflows: an environmental source of hormones and wastewater micropollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 5336–5343 (2012).
Hammond, M. J., Chen, A. S., Djordjević, S., Butler, D. & Mark, O. Urban flood impact assessment: a state-of-the-art review. Urban Water J. 12, 14–29 (2015).
Rosenzweig, B. et al. Developing knowledge systems for urban resilience to cloudburst events. Environ. Sci. Policy 99, 150–159 (2019).
Simpson, P. Water stewardship in the twenty-first century. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 311–313 (2014).
Chini, C. M., Canning, J. F., Schreiber, K. L., Peschel, J. M. & Stillwell, A. S. The green experiment: cities, green stormwater infrastructure, and sustainability. Sustainability 9, 105 (2017).
Gaffin, S. R., Rosenzweig, C. & Kong, A. Y. Y. Adapting to climate change through urban green infrastructure. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 704 (2012).
Gaines, J. M. Flooding: water potential. Nature 531, S54–S55 (2016).
Kabisch, N. et al. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas—perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers and opportunities for action. Ecol. Soc. 21, 39 (2016).
Li, H., Ding, L., Ren, M., Li, C. & Wang, H. Sponge city construction in China: a survey of the challenges and opportunities. Water 9, 594 (2017).
Brudler, S., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Hauschild, M. Z. & Rygaard, M. Life cycle assessment of stormwater management in the context of climate change adaptation. Water Res. 106, 394–404 (2016).
Brudler, S. et al. Life cycle assessment of point source emissions and infrastructure impacts of four types of urban stormwater systems. Water Res. 156, 383–394 (2019).
Albino, V., Berardi, U. & Dangelico, R. M. Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 22, 3–21 (2015).
Eggimann, S. et al. The potential of knowing more: a review of data-driven urban water management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 2538–2553 (2017).
Gourbesville, P. Editorial: why smart water journal? Smart Water 1, 1–2 (2016).
WATER 4.0 (German Water Partnership, 2018); https://germanwaterpartnership.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/GWP_Brochure_Water_4.0.pdf
Sedlak, D. Water 4.0: The Past, Present, and Future of the World’s Most Vital Resource (Yale Univ. Press, 2014).
Andreja, R. Industry 4.0 concept: background and overview. Int. J. Interact. Mobile Technol. 11, 77–90 (2017).
Kerkez, B. et al. Smarter stormwater systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 7267–7273 (2016).
García, L. et al. Modeling and real-time control of urban drainage systems: a review. Adv. Water Resour. 85, 120–132 (2015).
Gaborit, E., Anctil, F., Pelletier, G. & Vanrolleghem, P. A. Exploring forecast-based management strategies for stormwater detention ponds. Urban Water J. 13, 841–851 (2016).
Quigley, M. & Brown, C. Transforming Our Cities: High-Performance Green Infrastructure Report No. INFR1R11 (Water Environment Research Foundation, 2014).
Lerer, S. M., Righetti, F., Rozario, T. & Mikkelsen, P. S. Integrated hydrological model-based assessment of stormwater management scenarios in Copenhagen’s first climate resilient neighbourhood using the three point approach. Water 9, 883 (2017).
Fratini, C., Geldof, G. D., Kluck, J. & Mikkelsen, P. S. Three points approach (3PA) for urban flood risk management: a tool to support climate change adaptation through transdisciplinarity and multifunctionality. Urban Water J. 9, 317–331 (2012).
Adams, C. Copenhagen ranked most liveable city for Europeans. The Independent (13 February 2019); https://go.nature.com/2npRkbQ
Climate Change Adaptation and Investment Statement—Part 1 (City of Copenhagen, 2015).
Madsen, H. M., Mikkelsen, P. S. & Blok, A. Framing professional climate risk knowledge: extreme weather events as drivers of adaptation innovation in Copenhagen, Denmark. Environ. Sci. Policy 98, 30–38 (2019).
Carr, R. W., Esposito, C. & Walesh, S. G. Street-surface storage for control of combined sewer surcharge. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 127, 162–167 (2001).
Walesh, S. G. Street Storage System for Control of Combined Sewer Surcharge Report No. EPA/600/R-00/065 (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2000).
Sörensen, J. et al. Re-thinking urban flood management—time for a regime shift. Water 8, 332 (2016).
Xu, W. D. et al. Improving the multi-objective performance of rainwater harvesting systems using real-time control technology. Water 10, 147 (2018).
Bilodeau, K., Pelletier, G. & Duchesne, S. Real-time control of stormwater detention basins as an adaptation measure in mid-size cities. Urban Water J. 15, 858–867 (2018).
Mullapudi, A., Wong, B. P. & Kerkez, B. Emerging investigators series: building a theory for smart stormwater systems. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 3, 66–77 (2017).
Vezzaro, L., Christensen, M. L., Thirsing, C., Grum, M. & Mikkelsen, P. S. Water quality-based real time control of integrated urban drainage systems: a preliminary study from Copenhagen, Denmark. Procedia Eng. 70, 1707–1716 (2014).
Chen, P. et al. Scenario simulation-based assessment of trip difficulty for urban residents under rainstorm waterlogging. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 9, 2057–2074 (2012).
Pregnolato, M., Ford, A., Wilkinson, S. M. & Dawson, R. J. The impact of flooding on road transport: a depth-disruption function. Transport. Res. Pt D 55, 67–81 (2017).
Wong, T. H. F. & Brown, R. R. The water sensitive city: principles for practice. Water Sci. Technol. 60, 673–682 (2009).
Henonin, J., Russo, B., Mark, O. & Gourbesville, P. Real-time urban flood forecasting and modelling—a state of the art. J. Hydroinform. 15, 717–736 (2013).
Madsen, H., Falk, A. K. & Halvgaard, R. A model predictive control framework for real-time optimisation of water system operations. In Proc. 13th International Conference on Hydroinformatics (eds La Loggia, G. et al.) 1281–1288 (EasyChair, 2018).
Thorndahl, S. et al. Weather radar rainfall data in urban hydrology. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 1359–1380 (2017).
Leth, C. & Christensen, P. E. Cloudburst valve. Denmark patent DK178640B1 (2016).
The Waterway—New Paths for Rainwater in Middelfart (Middelfart Municipality, 2019); https://climatelab.middelfart.dk/Waterway
Elmqvist, T. et al. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat. Sustain. 2, 267–273 (2019).
de Haan, F. J. et al. The needs of society: A new understanding of transitions, sustainability and liveability. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 85, 121–132 (2014).
World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2018).
Halvgaard, R., Vandenberghe, L., Poulsen, N. K., Madsen, H. & Jørgensen, J. B. Distributed model predictive control for smart energy systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7, 1675–1682 (2016).
Kamal, A. S., Imura, J.-I., Hayakawa, T., Ohata, A. & Aihara, K. Smart driving of a vehicle using model predictive control for improving traffic flow. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. 15, 878–888 (2014).
We thank R. Halvgaard and A. K. Falk from DHI for many inspiring discussions over the past years, and HOFOR for access to a 1D hydrodynamic model for the case area. We acknowledge financial support from Realdania through the ‘Klimaspring’ programme as part of the ‘Smart Cities Water Solutions’ project, and from Innovation Fund Denmark through the ‘Water Smart Cities’ project.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lund, N.S.V., Borup, M., Madsen, H. et al. Integrated stormwater inflow control for sewers and green structures in urban landscapes. Nat Sustain 2, 1003–1010 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0392-1
This article is cited by
Scientific Reports (2022)
Intelligent Scheduling of Urban Drainage Systems: Effective Local Adaptation Strategies for Increased Climate Variability
Water Resources Management (2022)