Forging future organizational leaders for sustainability science

Leaders of sustainability research organizations need to provide an environment where interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary science flourish. Developing the necessary leadership skills and attributes requires new, targeted training programmes.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Irwin, E. G. et al. Nat. Sustain. 1, 324–326 (2018).

  2. 2.

    Hull, R. B., Robertson, D. & Mortimer, M. Sustainability 11, 4 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Special initiatives — leadership development program. Corporate Eco Forum http://www.corporateecoforum.com/member-challenge (2019).

  4. 4.

    Eigenbrode, S. D. et al. Leading Large Transdisciplinary Projects Addressing Social-Ecological Systems (2017); https://www.sesync.org/leading-large-transdisciplinary-projects-addressing-social-ecological-systems

  5. 5.

    Palmer, L. Nat. Sustain. 1, 330–333 (2018).

  6. 6.

    Drucker, P. Managing the Non-profit Organization (Routledge Press, 2012).

  7. 7.

    Nicholls, A. (ed.) Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change (Oxford Univ. Press, 2008).

  8. 8.

    Executive education. Harvard Business School www.exed.hbs.edu (2019).

  9. 9.

    MBA for executives. Yale School of Management https://som.yale.edu/programs/emba (2019).

  10. 10.

    Executive business education: degrees and short courses for experienced working professionals. London School of Economics www.lse.ac.uk/management/study/executive (2019).

  11. 11.

    Leshner Leadership Institute for public engagement with science. American Association for the Advancement of Science https://www.aaas.org/programs/leshner-institute (2019).

  12. 12.

    Liu, J. et al. Nat. Sustain. 2, 80–82 (2019).

  13. 13.

    Powell, W. W. et al. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 1132–1205 (2005).

  14. 14.

    Adner, R. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 58, 141–146 (2016).

  15. 15.

    IAP2’s Public Participation Spectrum (International Association for Public Participation, 2014); https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/foundations_course/IAP2_P2_Spectrum_FINAL.pdf

  16. 16.

    Fitzsimons, D., James, K. T. & Denyer, D. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 13, 313–328 (2011).

  17. 17.

    Leadership development. Big Ten Academic Alliance http://www.btaa.org/leadership (2019).

  18. 18.

    Gosling, J. & Mintzberg, H. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 45, 19–23 (2004).

  19. 19.

    Global Challenges Research Fund. UK Research and Innovation https://www.ukri.org/research/global-challenges-research-fund (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding received from the National Science Foundation DBI-1639145. Thanks to M. Palmer, Director of SESYNC and J. Kramer, Director for Interdisciplinary Science at SESYNC, who hosted the first meeting of leaders and for participating in that meeting. The Santa Fe Institute supported and hosted a follow-up workshop on ‘Tackling Complex Sustainability Issues: Lessons from Inter- and Transdisciplinary Organizations’, which led to the production of this Comment.

Author information

Correspondence to I. J. Gordon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark