Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Building back bigger in hurricane strike zones


Despite decades of regulatory efforts in the United States to decrease vulnerability in developed coastal zones, exposure of residential assets to hurricane damage is increasing — even in places where hurricanes have struck before. Comparing plan-view footprints of individual residential buildings before and long after major hurricane strikes, we find a systematic pattern of ‘building back bigger’ among renovated and new properties.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Study locations in hurricane strike zones around the US Atlantic and Gulf Coasts.
Fig. 2: Evidence of building back bigger in hurricane strike zones.

Data availability

Study data are available through Figshare ( Coordinates for the start and end points of the sampled areas are shown in Supplementary Table 4.


  1. 1.

    Moser, S. C. et al. in Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment (eds Melillo, J. M. et al.) 579–618 (US Global Change Research Program, Washington DC, 2014).

  2. 2.

    US National Research Council Reducing Coastal Risks on the East and Gulf Coasts (NRC, Washington DC, 2014).

  3. 3.

    Bagstad, K. J., Stapleton, K. & D’Agostino, J. R. Ecol. Econ. 63, 285–298 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    McNamara, D. E., Gopalakrishnan, S., Smith, M. D. & Murray, A. B. PLoS ONE 10, e0121278 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Armstrong, S. B. et al. Earths Futur. 4, 626–635 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dash, N., Morrow, B. H., Mainster, J. & Cunningham, L. Nat. Hazards Rev. 8, 13–21 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Peacock, W. G., Van Zandt, S., Zhang, Y. & Highfield, W. E. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 80, 356–371 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Highfield, W. E., Peacock, W. G. & Van Zandt, S. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 34, 287–300 (2014).

  9. 9.

    van Verseveld, H. C. W., van Dongeren, A. R., Plant, N. G., Jäger, W. S. & den Heijer, C. Coast. Eng. 103, 1–14 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Platt, R. H., Salvesen, D. & Baldwin, G. H. II Coast. Manage. 30, 249–269 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Deyle, R. E., Chapin, T. S. & Baker, E. J. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 74, 349–370 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dyckman, C. S. & Wood, I. L. Coast. Manage. 41, 501–536 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dehring, C. A. & Halek, M. Land Econ. 89, 597–613 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hallstrom, D. G. & Smith, V. K. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 50, 541–561 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nordstrom, K. F. & Jackson, N. L. J. Coast. Conserv. 1, 51–62 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kim, K. & Olshansky, R. B. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 80, 289–292 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Comerio, M. C. ‎J. Contingencies Crisis Manag. 5, 166–178 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Alexandre, P. M. et al. Int. J. Wildland Fire 24, 138–149 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mileti, D. Disasters By Design (Joseph Henry, Washington DC, 1999).

  20. 20.

    Filatova, T. Environ. Sci. Policy 37, 227–242 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported in part by the Cardiff Undergraduate Research Opportunities Programme (to E.D.L. and R.D.), and by the UK NERC BLUEcoast project (to E.D.L.; NE/N015665/2). We thank R. C. Ballinger and P. Barnard.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Author information




PWL conceived the idea; all authors contributed to data collection; E.D.L., P.W.L., E.B.G., and R.D. conducted the analysis; E.D.L., E.B.G., and P.W.L. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from R.D. and S.B.A.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eli D. Lazarus.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Reference 1, Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Tables 1–4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lazarus, E.D., Limber, P.W., Goldstein, E.B. et al. Building back bigger in hurricane strike zones. Nat Sustain 1, 759–762 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing