Diagnostics play a crucial role in screening, detecting, and stratifying patients, yet can account for only 2–3% of healthcare spending. With advancements in wearable technology and direct-to-consumer testing, the market for consumer health continues to rise. The potential benefits of more holistic and continuous measurement offer a promising opportunity for earlier disease detection and proactive health management. Many health systems are in a parallel transition from legacy analogue approaches to digitally enabled infrastructures. The evolving role of the clinical workforce, including medical ethics, regulation, will be closely coupled and a critical lever in success. This includes on a patient and clinician level, balancing the benefits and risks of interventions, and care pathway level, promoting responsible data utilisation with greater contextualisation based on the latest evidence of clinical efficacy. Moving forward a balance may need to be struck between increased data capture, analysis and reuse, with proportionate ethics, regulation, trust and governance.
The case for change
Healthcare systems globally face significant and growing challenges, from climate change’s significant threat to human health, global workforce shortages and supply chain challenges, to declining life expectancy and growing inequalities1,2. All whilst the cost of healthcare increases in many countries. At the heart of responding to these challenges is the need for an integrated approach to innovation and service redesign to ensure that healthcare systems are fit for purpose, are sustainable, and deliver a positive impact for clinicians, consumers, and communities. Embracing innovation and embedding technology throughout the healthcare ecosystem will be critical to tackling these issues head-on. However adapting and shaping the wider approach to healthcare will also be key, including how regulation, workforce and medical ethics are ‘drivers not passengers’ in this change.
The crucial role of diagnostics
Diagnostic technologies play a pivotal role across the care continuum in screening, detecting and stratifying patients1,3. Within the NHS, it has been estimated over 85% of patients seeking care will require some form of diagnostic technology4. Despite influencing 70 per cent of medical decision-making, diagnostics can account for in some circumstances only 2–3 per cent of healthcare spending5. In the ever-evolving healthcare landscape, diagnostics occupies a curious position2,6,7. They hold the potential power to illuminate unseen dangers, guide personalised treatment to unlock precision medicine, with early diagnosis a key tool in improving patient outcomes and reducing demand on downstream primary and secondary care services8,9,10. Moreover, diagnostics and assessments are no longer bound to clinics or laboratories, and can now take place ‘where the patient is’ (often at home or work) instead of where the clinician is11. Additionally, an increased availability of technologies has facilitated some individuals to become more self-aware of their own health status in a connected and data-driven manner2,9.
This paradigm shift may also have broader value and power through keeping individuals ‘well’ through primary prevention and delaying morbidity. However, as recently outlined, with great power ‘comes great responsibility’, and the unforeseen impacts of the perceived positive quantified self also need to be evaluated, including the evidence base for monitoring, and how data will be gathered, used, and re-used12. This increasingly is blurring the boundaries of diagnostics and consumer health12,13 (Fig. 1).
The intertwined challenges of diagnostics and consumer health data
Fuelled by advancements in wearable technology and direct-to-consumer testing, the market for consumer health continues to rise and gain momentum13. A potential key advantage of high-frequency sensing and measurement is the opportunity for more holistic and continuous measurement, avoiding traditional episodic assessment which may miss subtle or difficult-to-quantify impairments6,9,14,15. Whilst this has the potential to offer earlier detection and foster a more proactive health management approach for citizens and the public. Deployment and management of direct-to-consumer testing and consumer health technologies will require additional consideration to deliver equitable value for clinicians, consumers and care pathways15,16,17 (Fig. 2).
The role of diagnostics and the clinical workforce remain closely coupled, with clinicians playing a crucial role in navigating these challenges. Clinical judgement, supported by advancements in technology, may increasingly become more critical to act as a vital filter, interpreting test results within the context of a patient’s individual history, symptoms, and overall health picture. This clinician expertise may become increasingly prominent in the ways:
-
1.
Manage false positives and misinterpretations: Alongside advancements in AI, by applying their knowledge of disease presentation, broader evidence base and test limitations, clinicians can help to differentiate true positives from misleading results.
-
2.
Weigh up potential benefits and negatives of interventions: Clinicians can continue to engage in discussion with patients to weigh up the potential situational benefits and risks of treatment against the potential impact of different interventions, with the patients’ individual perspectives and situations in mind.
-
3.
Promote responsible data and resource utilisation: Clinicians can help guide the patient and consumer in using and sharing their data effectively, focusing on tangible insights and clinically meaningful results for their own circumstances. This is increasingly important with broader sustainability factors in healthcare2.
Finding an appropriate balance to realise diagnostics’ value
The potential positive impacts of direct-to-consumer diagnostics are undeniable, but its full realisation hinges on addressing the inherent challenges and embracing responsible utilisation. Striking a balance between empowering individuals, highlighting the important role of clinicians and ensuring responsible data interpretation and use of evidence will be critical. All of which deserve a multi-pronged approach. Firstly, the evidence base for any proposed deployment of technology. This can facilitate frameworks, guidelines and education to better equip both clinicians and the consumer with the knowledge and skills to understand and interpret diagnostic or related data responsibly. Additionally recognising the importance of the clinician-patient interaction: exploring mechanisms to continue fostering open and transparent communication between clinicians and patients to address anxieties, discuss uncertainties, and guide responsible data interpretation. Lastly a renewed focus on both the regulation and ethical considerations that are fit for purpose for the clinician, consumer and care pathway would be beneficial. Following this establishing clear guidelines and ethical frameworks to govern a spectrum of activities from the development, deployment, and utilisation of diagnostic technologies to the use of AI, including data analysis, with impacts on environmental sustainability and responsible data practices7 (Fig. 3).
Conclusion and next steps
Novel diagnostic technologies and deployment stand poised to revolutionise health, but their full potential is likely only to be realised through proportionate regulation, sustained investment, and greater focus on distributed trust and patient empowerment. Despite influencing a vast majority of medical decisions, diagnostics currently receive a modest share of healthcare spending5. The perceived disconnect between ambition and impact could be further addressed via sustainable investment to ensure the widespread adoption and evaluation of impacts from diagnostic innovations. As previously discussed, the future of diagnostics will likely be in a more decentralised model, where patients play a proactive role in managing their health through connected technologies and new offerings through digital biomarkers and data-driven insights. However, this shift will necessitate a careful balance between innovation and ethical considerations surrounding data privacy, security, and equitable access. As outlined in Fig. 4, a multi-pronged approach may be a necessary precursor to harnessing value. Robust frameworks could be developed to protect patient rights and ensure that diagnostic advancements benefit all individuals, regardless of socioeconomic status or geographical location18.
By embracing these strategies, diagnostics may illuminate a brighter future for healthcare, where early detection, targeted treatments, and precision medicine lead to improved patient outcomes, reduced healthcare costs, and a more proactive approach to health management. While the exact path forward is not yet clear, the direction of travel is evident and it’s a critical time to harness the power of diagnostics to transform healthcare for the better.
References
Wilkinson, E. The rise of direct-to-consumer testing: is the NHS paying the price? BMJ 379, 2518 (2022).
Powell, D. & Godfrey, A. Considerations for integrating wearables into the everyday healthcare practice. npj Digit. Med. 6, 70 (2023).
Mahase, E. Pandemic self-testing has led to boom in unregulated ‘wellness’ tests, researchers warn. BMJ 382, p1895 (2023).
The King’s Fund. What are diagnostics, and how are diagnostics services performing? Preprint at https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/data-and-charts/what-are-diagnostics (The King’s Fund, 2023).
Mccaughey, H. NHS England and NHS Improvement Board Meetings Held in Common NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHS England, 2022).
Powell, D. Digital Biomarkers for Health Monitoring: Why We Need to ‘Watch the Whole Movie Not Just the Trailer’—Thoughts from the Centre | Deloitte LLP, UK. https://blogs.deloitte.co.uk/health/2023/03/digital-biomarkers-for-health-monitoring-why-we-need-to-watch-the-whole-movie-not-just-the-trailer-.html (2023).
Smuck, M., Odonkor, C. A., Wilt, J. K., Schmidt, N. & Swiernik, M. A. The emerging clinical role of wearables: factors for successful implementation in healthcare. npj Digit. Med. 4, 1–8 (2021).
Gray, D. P., Dineen, M. & Sidaway-Lee, K. The worried well. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 70, 84–85 (2020).
Powell, D. Walk, talk, think, see and feel: harnessing the power of digital biomarkers in healthcare. npj Digit. Med. 7, 1–3 (2024).
Wall, C., Hetherington, V. & Godfrey, A. Beyond the clinic: the rise of wearables and smartphones in decentralising healthcare. npj Digit. Med. 6, 1–3 (2023).
Hawkes, N. Hospitals without walls. BMJ (Online) 347, f5479 (2013).
Gilbert, S., Baca-Motes, K., Quer, G., Wiedermann, M. & Brockmann, D. Citizen data sovereignty is key to wearables and wellness data reuse for the common good. npj Digit. Med. 7, 1–3 (2024).
Sharon, T. Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philos. Technol. 30, 93–121 (2017).
Hayes, T. L. et al. Unobtrusive assessment of activity patterns associated with mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 4, 395–405 (2008).
Editor’s Choice. Too much medicine. The BMJ. 346, f1328 (2013). https://www.bmj.com/too-much-medicine.
Brito, J. P., Morris, J. C. & Montori, V. M. Thyroid cancer: zealous imaging has increased detection and treatment of low risk tumours. BMJ 347, f4706 (2013).
Brodersen, J. et al. Overdiagnosis: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ Evid. Based Med. 23, 1–3 (2018).
Kvedar, J. C. Evidence for the effectiveness of digital health. npj Digit. Med. 3, 1–1 (2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.H. aided with the ideation and proofing of the manuscript. D.P. developed the concept and wrote the first draft and amended the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial or non-financial interest. D.P. is a news and views editor at npj Digital Medicine and played no role in the internal review or decision to publish this News and Views article.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Powell, D., Hannah, A. The dichotomy of diagnostics: exploring the value for consumers, clinicians and care pathways. npj Digit. Med. 7, 101 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01087-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01087-8