Correction to: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02418-y, published online 03 January 2024
In the note sections of tables 9–12, there was an error regarding how the size of the symbols (“●” and “⊗”) used in the table were displayed. In the original publication they were all the same size.
Corrections have been made to rectify the sizes of the symbols in Tables 9 to 11 to show differing sizes.
The correct tables are shown below.
Table 9 Condition configuration of employees’ high work engagement
Solution | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1a | H1b | H2a | H2b | H3a | H2b | H3c | |
Openness to experience (KFX) | |||||||
Neuroticism (SJZ) | |||||||
Agreeableness (YRX) | |||||||
Conscientiousness (JZX) | |||||||
Extraversion (WXX) | |||||||
Self-efficacy (GS) | |||||||
Technostress creators (TC) | |||||||
Consistency | 0.980 | 0.982 | 0.987 | 0.982 | 0.976 | 0.982 | 0.991 |
Raw coverage | 0.551 | 0.533 | 0.438 | 0.537 | 0.418 | 0.546 | 0.332 |
Unique coverage | 0.022 | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0.010 | 0.009 | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Overall solution consistency | 0.960 | ||||||
Overall solution coverage | 0.721 |
Note: In the table, “” represents the presence of a condition as a core condition, “” represents the absence of a condition as a core condition, “” represents the presence of a condition as a peripheral condition, “” represents the absence of a condition as a peripheral condition, and a blank space indicates that the presence or absence of a condition has no impact on the occurrence of the outcome. If all preceding conditions are blank, the configuration is considered a logical remainder.
Table 10 Condition configuration of employees’ low work engagement
Solution | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NH1a | NH1b | NH1c | NH2a | NH2b | NH2c | |
Openness to experience (KFX) | ||||||
Neuroticism (SJZ) | ||||||
Agreeableness (YRX) | ||||||
Conscientiousness (JZX) | ||||||
Extraversion (WXX) | ||||||
Self-efficacy (GS) | ||||||
Technostress creators (TC) | ||||||
Consistency | 0.926 | 0.876 | 0.868 | 0.985 | 0.945 | 0.860 |
Raw coverage | 0.361 | 0.330 | 0.266 | 0.589 | 0.335 | 0.262 |
Unique coverage | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.035 | 0.280 | 0.006 | 0.033 |
Overall solution consistency | 0.901 | |||||
Overall solution coverage | 0.796 |
Note: In the table, “” represents the presence of a condition as a core condition, “” represents the absence of a condition as a core condition, “” represents the presence of a condition as a peripheral condition, “” represents the absence of a condition as a peripheral condition, and a blank space indicates that the presence or absence of a condition has no impact on the occurrence of the outcome. If all preceding conditions are blank, the configuration is considered a logical remainder.
Table 11 Robustness analysis of employees’ high job engagement configurations
Solution | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Configuration 1 | Configuration 2 | Configuration 3 | Configuration 4 | Configuration 5 | |
Openness to experience (KFX) | |||||
Neuroticism (SJZ) | |||||
Agreeableness (YRX) | |||||
Conscientiousness (JZX) | |||||
Extraversion (WXX) | |||||
Self-efficacy (GS) | |||||
Technostress creators (TC) | |||||
Consistency | 0.982 | 0.982 | 0.991 | 0.993 | 0.975 |
Raw coverage | 0.537 | 0.546 | 0.332 | 0.311 | 0.334 |
Unique coverage | 0.107 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.008 |
Overall solution consistency | 0.969 | ||||
Overall solution coverage | 0.679 |
Note: In the table, “” represents the presence of a condition as a core condition, “” represents the absence of a condition as a core condition, “” represents the presence of a condition as a peripheral condition, “” represents the absence of a condition as a peripheral condition, and a blank space indicates that the presence or absence of a condition has no impact on the occurrence of the outcome. If all preceding conditions are blank, the configuration is considered a logical remainder.
Table 12 Robustness analysis of employees’ low job engagement configurations
Solution | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Configuration 1’ | Configuration 2’ | Configuration 3’ | Configuration 4’ | Configuration 5’ | |
Openness to experience (KFX) | |||||
Neuroticism(SJZ) | |||||
Agreeableness (YRX) | |||||
Conscientiousness (JZX) | |||||
Extraversion (WXX) | |||||
Self-efficacy (GS) | |||||
Technostress creators (TC) | |||||
Consistency | 0.986 | 0.945 | 0.915 | 0.868 | 0.860 |
Raw coverage | 0.647 | 0.308 | 0.310 | 0.266 | 0.262 |
Unique coverage | 0.317 | 0.004 | 0.012 | 0.045 | 0.039 |
Overall solution consistency | 0.914 | ||||
Overall solution coverage | 0.804 |
Note: In the table, “” represents the presence of a condition as a core condition, “” represents the absence of a condition as a core condition, “” represents the presence of a condition as a peripheral condition, “” represents the absence of a condition as a peripheral condition, and a blank space indicates that the presence or absence of a condition has no impact on the occurrence of the outcome. If all preceding conditions are blank, the configuration is considered a logical remainder.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, D., Xu, B., Wei, B. et al. Correction: Employee work engagement in the digital transformation of enterprises: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11, 198 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02672-8
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02672-8