Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) activate DNA damage responses (DDRs) in both mitotic and meiotic cells. A single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein, Replication protein-A (RPA) binds to the ssDNA formed at DSBs to activate ATR/Mec1 kinase for the response. Meiotic DSBs induce homologous recombination monitored by a meiotic DDR called the recombination checkpoint that blocks the pachytene exit in meiotic prophase I. In this study, we further characterized the essential role of RPA in the maintenance of the recombination checkpoint during Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis. The depletion of an RPA subunit, Rfa1, in a recombination-defective dmc1 mutant, fully alleviates the pachytene arrest with the persistent unrepaired DSBs. RPA depletion decreases the activity of a meiosis-specific CHK2 homolog, Mek1 kinase, which in turn activates the Ndt80 transcriptional regulator for pachytene exit. These support the idea that RPA is a sensor of ssDNAs for the activation of meiotic DDR. Rfa1 depletion also accelerates the prophase I delay in the zip1 mutant defective in both chromosome synapsis and the recombination, consistent with the notion that the accumulation of ssDNAs rather than defective synapsis triggers prophase I delay in the zip1 mutant.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A eukaryotic single-stranded (ss)DNA binding protein, Replication protein-A (RPA), plays an essential role in DNA replication, DNA repair, and homologous recombination1,2,3. RPA consists of three subunits; RPA70(RPA1), RPA32(RPA2), and RPA14(RPA3), which are highly conserved from yeast to humans. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the knockout of either one of three genes (RFA1, -2, and -3) encoding the RPA subunits leads to lethality, consistent with its essential role in DNA replication4. RPA also plays a role in DNA damage response (DDR)3,5.
In homologous recombination, RPA binds to ssDNAs to prevent the formation of the secondary structure of ssDNAs and to protect ssDNAs from degradation by various nucleases6. The assembly of Rad51 filaments on RPA-coated ssDNA is assisted by Rad51 mediators such as Rad52 in the budding yeast7,8,9. RPA assists Rad51-mediated homology search and strand exchange with a homologous double-stranded (ds)DNA10. The invasion of the ssDNA into the homologous dsDNA results in the formation of a displacement loop (D-loop). The 3’-OH end of the invading strand provides a substrate for DNA synthesis, which is followed by further processing and engaging with the ssDNA in the other DSB end to form a joint molecule. The joint molecule is finally matured into a recombination product. RPA also works in recombination-associated DNA synthesis as well as the annealing in the second-end capture.
DNA double-strand break (DSB) activates the DDR. DSB ends stimulate a DDR kinase, ATM/Tel1 (Ataxia telangiectasia mutated) while ssDNAs do an ATM homolog, ATR/Mec1 (Ataxia telangiectasia mutated related), both of which belong to the PI3 kinase family11,12. The activation of ATR is mediated by the interaction with an ATR partner, ATRIP/Ddc2, which directly interacts with RPA bound to ssDNAs13,14,15. In mammals, ATR activation is also mediated by the second RPA-binding protein, ETAA116,17. Thus, RPA is considered to work as an essential DNA damage sensor to ssDNAs as well as a DNA damage processing protein.
Meiosis rewires DNA transactions such as homologous recombination/DSB repair as well as DDR to guarantee the faithful segregation of two paternal homologous chromosomes at meiosis I for the reduction of chromosome numbers in gametes. In budding yeast, meiotic recombination is initiated by the DSB formation at recombination hotspots by the TopoVI-like protein, Spo11, which is followed by the production of ssDNAs18,19. The ssDNA is used by a meiosis-specific Rad51 homolog, Dmc120, for D-loop formation, which is aided by Rad5121 and its mediator, Mei5-Sae3 complex22,23. Further processing generates a recombination intermediate with double-Holliday junctions (dHJs), which are specifically resolved into crossovers between homologs. Importantly, the partner choice in the recombination is mediated by meiosis-specific chromosome-axis proteins (Hop1, Red1, and Mek1/Mre4), promoting interhomolog bias via an unknown mechanism24,25,26. Mek1/Mre4 (hereafter Mek1), a meiosis-specific homolog of Rad53/CHK2 kinase27,28, suppresses Rad51-mediated recombination in meiosis25,26. This suppression occurs through the Mek1-mediated phosphorylation of two proteins, Rad54 and Hed129,30. Rad54 belongs to the Swi2/Snf2 family protein essential for Rad51-mediated strand invasion31. Mek1-mediated phosphorylation of Rad54 abolishes its interaction with Rad5130. Hed1, which is expressed only in meiosis, inhibits Rad51 by binding to the Rad51-ssDNA complex32. The inhibitory activity of Hed1 against Rad51 and the stability of Hed1 are augmented by the Mek1-mediated phosphorylation29.
Meiotic events such as recombination and chromosome synapsis are strictly coupled with each other (Fig. 1)33. Similar to mitosis, DSBs in yeast meiosis activate Tel1(ATM) and Mec1(ATR). Different from mitotic DNA damage checkpoint, downstream events of Mec1 or Tel1 activation such as the Rad53 activation are largely suppressed in meiotic cells with poorly-defined mechanisms34,35. On the other hand, Mec1 and/or Tel1 phosphorylates Hop1 on chromosome axis36. Together with chromosomal-bound Red1, phosphorylated Hop1 activates Mek1 kinase, whose autophosphorylation provides positive feedback on its activity37. Mek1-mediated phosphorylation promotes the inactivation of the Ndt80 transcription factor38 essential for the exit from the pachytene stage, where chromosome synapsis and the formation of the dHJs are completed37,39. By activating Ndt80 (through inactivating Mek1), meiotic cells exit the pachytene stage by expressing downstream targets such as Cdc5 Polo-like kinase (PLK) and a cyclin, Clb140 for the resolution of dHJs and the disassembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC), a meiosis-specific tripartite chromosome structure, an indicative of chromosome synapsis.
It is widely accepted that meiotic cells surveil not only homologous recombination but also chromosome synapsis, referred to as the “recombination” and “synapsis” checkpoints (Fig. 1). Like a recombination-defective dmc1 mutant, the budding yeast zip1 mutant, which is defective in the assembly of the central region of the SCs, thus synapsis shows a delay in meiosis progression41. In nematodes and mice, synapsis-defective mutants also delay the meiotic prophase I progression and/or induce apoptosis42,43. In yeast, chromosome synapsis is tightly coupled with meiotic recombination: e.g. a recombination-deficient mutant also displays abnormal synapsis44,45; the zip1 mutant completely defective in SC formation also impairs the processing of meiotic recombination intermediates. This complicates the presence of the synapsis checkpoint. Moreover, DDR proteins also play a role in meiotic recombination, which also provides a caveat in the interpretation of the meiotic phenotypes of DDR mutants46,47,48.
The role of RPA in DDR is widely accepted. In a pioneer work5, the depletion of RPA70 in human cell lines reduced the ATRIP/Ddc2 binding to the DNA damage as well as the activation of downstream events. In the same study, it was also shown that the depletion of Rfa1 in mitotic yeast cells by a temperature-induced degron reduced the binding of Ddc2 to a single DSB. On the other hand, the other report showed that Rfa1 depletion in G2/M-arrested mitotic cells in budding yeast by the degron does not affect checkpoint activation to a single DSB6. A point mutant in the RFA1 gene encoding RPA70 subunit of yeast RPA called rfa1-t11 with K45E substitution in the N-terminal protein–protein interaction domain is partially defective in the DDR in the response to telomere dysfunction49. Rfa1-t11 showed normal binding to the DSB, but the mutant decreased recruitment of Ddc2 to the DSB5. In meiosis, the rfa1-t11 with reduced Ddc2-focus formation in nuclei weakly suppresses the dmc1-induced delay in meiosis progression50 while RPA containing Rfa1-t11 showed normal localization on meiotic chromosomes51. The rfa1-t11 mutant alters recombination kinetics51, which may indirectly affect the checkpoint. Furthermore, the conditional depletion of Rpa1 in mouse spermatocytes eliminated RPA foci on meiotic chromosomes but is proficient in ATR recruitment to the chromosomes52. Therefore, we still need careful evaluation of the role of RPA in the DDR in meiotic cells.
In this study, we revisited the role of RPA in the meiotic recombination checkpoint by using a conditional-depletion mutant of Rfa1. The depletion of Rfa1 in the dmc1-induced pachytene arrest facilitates the pachytene exit, thus entry into meiosis I and II. Importantly, the RPA depletion did not change the accumulation unrepaired meiotic DSBs in the dmc1, which causes abnormal segregation of chromosomes in the division. This confirms the essential role of RPA in the maintenance of the meiotic recombination checkpoint. Moreover, we found that Rfa1 depletion also alleviates delayed meiosis progression in the zip1 mutant. This suggests that the zip1 mutation mainly triggers an RPA-dependent response of the prophase I delay, thus the recombination checkpoint rather than the synapsis checkpoint.
Results
Depletion of Rfa1 alleviates dmc1-induced arrest of meiosis
Three RPA subunits, Rfa1, -2, and -3, are essential for the viability of budding yeast cells4. To know the role of RPA in the DDR in yeast meiosis, we constructed a conditional depletion mutant of the RFA1 gene encoding the largest RPA subunit, Rfa1, by the auxin-induced degron (AID) system53. The AID tag was added to the C-terminal of the Rfa1 protein. The addition of auxin as well as copper, which induced Tir1 F-box protein, in the medium largely inhibited the mitotic growth of RFA1-AID cells with the CUP1p-TIR1 (Supplementary Fig. S1a), consistent with the previous study4. RFA1-AID diploid cells were induced for the entry of meiosis by incubating in the sporulation medium (SPM). When auxin was added at 4 h incubation with SPM after pre-meiotic DNA replication, which induced the disappearance of Rfa1 from 5 h (Supplementary Fig. S1b), the cells formed few spores after 24 h while more than 90% of the control wild-type cells sporulated (Supplementary Fig. S1c,d). Most of the Rfa1-depleted cells showed abnormal nuclear morphology (Supplementary Fig. S1c). Indeed, rarely formed tetrad of the cells are all dead (0 viable spores in 100 tetrads) while without the auxin treatment, the viability of spores from RFA1-AID cells was 91.8% (among 100 tetrads). Cdc5/PLK is expressed after the pachytene exit40,54. Although few spores were formed after Rfa1 depletion, Cdc5 was expressed with a slight delay compared to the control (Supplementary Fig. S1e), suggesting pachytene exit after the depletion of Rfa1. The pulse-field gel electrophoresis revealed the accumulation of meiotic DSBs on chromosomes (Supplementary Fig. S1f), confirming a defect in DSB repair51. These show that the AID-tag did not interfere with Rfa1 function in both miotic and meiotic cells and that Rfa1 is essential for both mitosis and meiosis.
To know the role of RPA in the recombination checkpoint in meiosis, we used the dmc1 mutant, which is unable to repair meiotic DSBs and, as a result, shows an arrest at mid-pachytene stage during meiotic prophase I20. This response to unrepaired DSBs is referred to as the recombination checkpoint. RFA1-AID was introduced in the dmc1 deletion mutant; dmc1 RFA1-AID. Like the dmc1 mutant, without auxin addition, dmc1 RFA1-AID shows an arrest in meiotic prophase I without division (e.g. Figure 2d), indicating that the Rfa1 tagging did not affect the recombination checkpoint in the absence of Dmc1. RPA is also involved in DNA replication and S-phase checkpoint1,2, which indirectly affects the G2 event. To avoid the effect in pre-meiotic DNA replication, we depleted Rfa1 protein by adding auxin to a meiotic culture of dmc1 RFA1-AID cells at 4 h after the induction of meiosis in SPM, thus, after pre-meiotic DNA replication, which occurs at 1.5–3 h. At 5 h, after the 1-h addition of auxin, the protein level of Rfa1-AID was decreased to ~ 15% level relative to the original level at 4 h (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Figs. S2a,b, and S3), indicating the efficient depletion of Rfa1 under the condition. We also checked the focus formation of Rfa2, the second subunit of RPA, on meiotic chromosome spreads. Rfa2 shows punctate staining on the spreads with other recombination proteins such as Rad5155, which corresponds with ongoing recombination (Fig. 2b). In the dmc1 mutant, Rfa2 focus-staining appears at 2.5 h, reaches a plateau at 5 h, and persists after that, indicating little turnover of Rfa2 due to stalled recombination in the mutant (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. S4a). When auxin was added at 4 h, Rfa2 foci disappeared within 1 h, and Rfa2 foci were rarely observed during further incubation by 10 h (Fig. 2b,c). This suggests that RPA is highly dynamic and easily dissociated from the chromosome. We concluded that Rfa1 depletion at 4 h in meiosis eliminates most chromosome-bound RPA complexes by 5 h.
Checkpoint alleviation in Rfa1 depletion in dmc1 meiosis
DAPI staining of DNAs confirmed a single DAPI body in a dmc1 RFA1-AID cell even at 24 h, thus an arrest in prophase I as shown previously20. Rfa1 depletion at 4 h induced fragmentation of DAPI bodies at late time points. In some cells, 2–4 irregular-sized DAPI bodies with smaller DAPI bodies were detected in a single cell (Fig. 2d). The cells with abnormal DAPI bodies appeared at 6 h and gradually accumulated by 24 h (Fig. 2e). Although ~ 75% of the cells finished MI at 24 h, the progression into MI was delayed by ~ 4 h relative to the control. These suggest the presence of nuclear division, thus the onset of meiosis I and/or II in the dmc1 cells upon Rfa1 depletion. We also checked the effect of Rfa1 depletion on meiotic DNA replication. The FACS analysis showed that the addition of auxin at 4 h did not affect the transition from 2 to 4C (Supplementary Fig. S2c).
To evaluate the meiosis progression precisely, we examined the status of spindle morphology in the dmc1 RFA1-AID cells in the absence or presence of auxin (Fig. 2f,g). Tubulin staining revealed a single focus associated with single or multiple short projections in meiotic prophase I of the cell in the absence of auxin (Fig. 2f). The dmc1 RFA1-AID mutant maintained this arrangement of spindles in the absence of auxin by 24 h, consistent with an arrest of the dmc1 mutant in prophase I (Fig. 2f). On the other hand, the Rfa1 depletion induced the elongation of spindles after 1 h of addition (at 5 h). At 6 h, ~ 50% dmc1 RFA1-AID cells contained single short and long spindles corresponding with metaphase I and anaphase I, respectively (Fig. 2e). At 8 h, in addition to the metaphase I and anaphase I spindle, ~ 70% of cells contained metaphase II or anaphase II spindles (Fig. 2f,g). At 10 h, most of the cells showed diffuse staining of microtubules in multiple DAPI bodies in a cell. These show that Rfa1 depletion almost alleviates meiotic prophase I arrest induced by the dmc1 mutation.
Like dmc1 cells, without auxin addition, the dmc1 RFA1-AID mutant cells did not express Cdc5 (Fig. 2a). On the other hand, the addition of auxin at 4 h induced the expression of Cdc5 from 5 h. This confirms the exit of the pachytene stage of dmc1 cells in the absence of RPA.
No DSB repair in dmc1 meiosis with Rfa1 depletion
One possibility to suppress the dmc1 arrest is to channel unrepaired DSBs into an alternative RAD51-dependent repair pathway. On the other hand, the acute depletion of RPA did not affect the status of meiotic DSBs under dmc1 arrest. The CHEF (Counter-clamped homogeneous electric field) gel electrophoresis confirmed the accumulation of fragmented chromosomes in the dmc1 mutant irrespective of the presence or absence of RPA. In the dmc1 RFA1-AID mutant without auxin treatment, smear bands of full-length chromosomes appeared at 3 h and most of the chromosomes became fragmented with a size of less than 700 kbp by 5 h. After 6 h, fragmented chromosomes persisted by 24 h (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. S5 for wild-type control). The depletion of Rfa1 from 4 h did not affect the persistence of fragmented chromosomes. This suggests that meiotic DSBs remain unrepaired under the depletion of RPA in the dmc1 mutant.
We also indirectly checked the DSB status by analyzing Rad51 foci on meiotic chromosomes (Fig. 3b,c). Like Rfa2 foci, in the dmc1 RFA1-AID mutant in the absence of auxin, Rad51 foci appeared at 4 h, reached a plateau at 5 h, and persisted at late times as shown previously56. The addition of auxin at 4 h rapidly induced the disappearance of Rad51 foci at 5 h. The reduced Rad51 foci are seen at late time points (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. S4b). This suggests that RPA is critical for the maintenance of Rad51 foci on the chromosomes. The absence of Rad51 foci in the Rfa1 depletion supports the inability of dmc1 RFA1-AID cells without RPA to repair meiotic DSBs by Rad51-dependent recombination.
The Hop1/Mek1-Ndt80 axis was down-regulated after RFA1 depletion
Un-repaired DSBs in the dmc1 mutant activate the recombination checkpoint, which down-regulates a meiosis-specific transcription activator, Ndt80 for the pachytene exit (Fig. 1). DSB-activated Mec1/ATR kinase phosphorylates a HORMAD protein, Hop1, which stimulates a meiosis-specific kinase, Mek1. Mek1 binds and phosphorylates Ndt80 to inactivate it. For pachytene exit, further phosphorylation of Nd80 by Ime2 kinase promotes the activation of Ndt8038. In dmc1 RFA1-AID cells, the Ndt80 appeared at 4 h with multiple bands and accumulated more during further incubation in SPM without a change of band-shift status (Fig. 2a). At 6 h, after 2 h of addition of auxin, a slower-migrating Ndt80 band appeared and accumulated. Importantly, as shown above, under the depletion condition, Cdc5/PLK, which is a major target of activated Ndt80 and is necessary for pachytene exit, appeared at 6 h (Fig. 2a). This is consistent with meiosis progression of the dmc1 mutant cells induced by Rfa1-depletion.
We also checked the behavior of Ndt80, and Hop1 by western blotting. In the dmc1 mutant, Hop1 appeared as a non-phosphorylated form at 2 h and phosphorylated Hop1 with slower migrated bands persisted from 4 h (Fig. 2a) as shown previously36. After Rfa1 depletion, major bands of phosphorylated Hop1 almost disappeared from 6 h with a similar steady-state level of non-phosphorylated Hop1 during the time course. This suggests that Hop1 is de-phosphorylated during pachytene exit. On chromosome spreads, Hop1 shows beads-in-line staining for the localization of chromosome axes (Fig. 3d)57,58. In the dmc1 mutant without Rfa1 depletion, Hop1 localization remains unchanged during meiosis (Fig. 3d). The addition of auxin at 4 h induced the disappearance of Hop1-positive spreads from 5 h. At 6 h, ~ 35% of cells are positive for Hop1 while ~ 95% are positive in a control (Fig. 3d,e). At 8 h, most of the Hop1 signals on the chromosomes disappeared.
One of the Mek1 kinase targets is histone H3T11 phosphorylation59. Under the dmc1 arrest condition, H3T11 phosphorylation accumulated (Fig. 2a). On the other hand, the Rfa1 depletion rapidly induced the disappearance of the signal (Fig. 2a), suggesting the downregulation of Mek1 activity under Rfa1 depletion. These results clearly showed that Rfa1, thus RPA, is critical for the maintenance of the recombination checkpoint through the Hop1/Mek1-Ndt80 axis.
The dmc1-induced arrest in meiosis is also partially suppressed by the rad5160. A recent study showed that the suppression of dmc1-arrest by the rad51 mutation is mediated by partial elongation of SCs with concomitant loss of Hop161. Rad51 loss from the chromosomes in the dmc1 mutant upon Rfa1-depletion such as 5-h time point by 4-h addition of auxin seems to mimic a condition seen in the rad51 dmc1 double mutant. To check whether partial SC formation occurs with the disappearance of Rad51 foci in the dmc1 mutant by Rfa1 depletion or not, we assessed SC formation by staining Zip1, a component of SC central region41. The Zip1 staining is categorized into three classes; dots, short lines, and long lines. As shown previously20, the dmc1 mutant is defective in SC elongation (Supplementary Fig. S6a,b). Rfa1 depletion from 4 h promotes the SC disassembly from 6 h. At 5 h when most of the Rad51 foci disappeared (Fig. 3c). However, we did not see elongation of Zip1 lines (increased short or long Zip1 lines) relative to control without Rfa1 depletion with persistent Rad51 foci. Instead, we observed a slight increase in Zip1 polycomplex, indicative of defective SC assembly (Supplementary Fig. S6c). Additionally, Hop1 localization 1 h after Rfa1 depletion (at 5 h) is similar to that without the depletion (Fig. 3d,e). These findings suggests that the suppression of dmc1-induced arrest by Rfa1 depletion is unlikely to result from altered Hop1 functions, which trigger partial SC formation as seen in the rad51 dmc1 double mutant61.
Bypass of dmc1 arrest by Rfa1 depletion depends on Ndt80
We tested whether the pachytene exit of the dmc1 cells by Rfa1 depletion depends on the NDT80 (Fig. 4). The addition of auxin to dmc1 ndt80 RFA1-AID cells efficiently reduced the amount of Rfa1 protein (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. S7) and Rfa2 foci from meiotic chromosomes (Fig. 4b). However, different from the dmc1 RFA1-AID mutant, the addition of auxin to dmc1 ndt80 RFA1-AID mutant did not induce the elongation of spindles (Fig. 4c) or Hop1 disassembly from the chromosomes (Fig. 4d). Thus, the pachytene exit of dmc1 cells by Rfa1 depletion still depends on Ndt80. Interestingly, the amount of the phosphorylated Hop1 is reduced slightly compared to that in the control (Fig. 4a). This is less drastic compared to the presence of Ndt80, supporting an auto-feedback mechanism between Mek1 activation and Ndt80 activation62.
Checkpoint alleviation in Rfa1 depletion in zip1 meiosis
Meiotic yeast cells monitor not only ongoing meiotic recombination but also chromosome synapsis43. However, the presence of the so-called “synapsis checkpoint” in yeast meiosis is under debate62. The mutant in the ZIP1 gene is deficient in chromosome synapsis with a delay of the entry into meiosis I and is used to analyze the synaptic checkpoint41. We examined the effect of Rfa1 depletion on the zip1-induced delay of meiosis I (Fig. 5). As reported previously45, in the SK1 strain background, zip1 RFA1-AID cells without auxin addition started meiosis I at 8 h while wild-type cells entered at 5 h (and finished meiosis II by 10 h) (Fig. 5b). When auxin was added at 4 h, which induced rapid depletion of Rfa1 and the dissociation of Rfa2 from meiotic chromosomes (Fig. 5a,c,h, Supplementary Fig. S8), metaphase I spindles appeared at 5 h, and at 6 h, ~ 35% of the cells contained metaphase-I and anaphase-I spindles (Fig. 5d,e). At 8 h, ~ 30% of the cells contained anaphase-II spindle. Importantly, DAPI staining showed the entry of the zip1 cells into meiosis I upon Rfa1 depletion is similar to that in wild-type cells (Fig. 5b). The spore viability of zip1 RFA1-AID cells treated with auxin was 0% while cells without auxin was 35.5% (among 100 tetrads).
The zip1 RFA1-AID cells without auxin expressed Cdc5 from 8 h (Fig. 5a), consistent with delayed progression of prophase I in the mutant. The addition of auxin at 4 h accelerated the Cdc5 expression from 5 h. The zip1 mutant accumulated H3T11 phosphorylation of histone H3 signal from 4 to 8 h (Fig. 5a). The Rfa1 depletion accelerated the disappearance of this phosphorylation from 5 h. The accelerated disappearance of the phospho-Hop1 protein is also seen by the depletion (Fig. 5a,f). These showed the Rfa1-dependent inactivation of the Hop1/Mek1-Ndt80 signaling pathway induced by the zip1 mutation. Thus, the delay induced by the zip1 mutation largely depends on the Rfa1.
In addition to SC formation, Zip1 plays a critical role in meiotic recombination as a pro-crossover factor. Indeed, the zip1 mutant shows delayed DSB repair. The CHEF analysis showed the presence of broken chromosomes in the zip1 mutant from 3 to 7 h (Fig. 5g). Importantly, full-length chromosomes were reassembled at 10 h without Rfa1 depletion, indicating that most of the DSBs in the zip1 mutant were repaired with the delay. On the other hand, Rfa1 depletion from 4 h induced fragmentation of the chromosomes from 5 h. Even after 24 h, little recovery of full-length chromosomes was seen under the condition. This suggests that Rfa1 is essential for meiotic DSB repair in the zip1 mutant.
Rfa1 depletion does not alleviate delay induced by rad50S meiosis
The rad50S mutant, which is defective in the end-processing of meiotic DSBs, also shows delayed meiosis I progression63. This delay in the rad50S mutant is mediated by Tel1(ATM) and Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2, which recognize DSB ends64. The pathway is distinct from the Mec1(ATR)-mediated pathway shown above. We also examined the effect of Rfa1 depletion on the rad50S-induced delay (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. S9). As reported, without auxin, rad50S RFA1-AID cells delay the onset of meiosis I as shown by whole-cell staining of tubulin (Fig. 6b). Rather, the addition of auxin to the rad50S RFA1-AID cells delayed the onset of meiosis I more than without the auxin. We cannot detect Rfa2 foci in the rad50S mutant even in the presence of Rfa1 (Fig. 6c), confirming that the rad50S accumulates unresected DSBs63. Moreover, Hop1 phosphorylation is not observed in the mutant (Fig. 6a). This is consistent with little formation of ssDNAs without DSB processing in the mutant63, thus little Mec1/ATR activation. This is expected since the rad50S mutant does not form any ssDNAs, which is a substrate for RPA. The accumulation of chromosomal Hop1 in the mutant is not affected by the Rfa1 depletion (Fig. 6d).
Discussion
RPA plays multiple roles in DNA replication, DNA repair, and recombination through its ability to bind to ssDNAs with a high affinity. RPA is also important for DDR as a sensor of DNA damage, thus ssDNAs. The role of RPA in Mec1(ATR) activation through the binding of Mec1(ATR)-interaction protein, Ddc2(ATRIP), to RPA has been documented well5,13,14. In this paper, we showed the pivotal role of RPA in the maintenance of DDR in meiosis, called recombination checkpoint.
The role of RPA in recombination checkpoint
Previously, in the budding yeast, two RFA1-degron mutants, rfa1-td and td-RFA1, were constructed and characterized to study the role of Rfa1 in DDR activation. Indeed, the rfa1-td, as well as the rft1-t11 (rfa1-K45E) mutant, reduce the recruitments of Ddc2 to a DSB site5. On the other hand, it is shown that, by using the td-RFA1, G2/M-arrested haploid cells depleted for Rfa1 still activate Rad53 upon a single DSB6. The latter study concludes that a low level of RPA is sufficient for the activation of Mec1-Ddc2. More recently, an RPA-independent pathway for ATR activation, which requires APE1, was identified in Xenopus egg extracts65. We revisited the role of RPA in DDR by studying the effect of Rfa1 depletion in DDR such as the meiotic recombination checkpoint. The recombination checkpoint in meiotic cells responds to the ssDNA through RPA-Mec1-Ddc2 axis as seen in a canonical DNA damage checkpoint in mitotic cells. By using the auxin-degron, we depleted Rfa1 in the dmc1 mutant which arrests in meiotic prophase I with hyper-resected ssDNAs in ~ 150 DSBs20. The Rfa1-depletion induced the pachytene exit by downregulating Mec1 and Mek1 activities, which in turn activates the Ndt80-dependent gene expression of key regulators for the pachytene exit such as Cdc540,54. This is consistent with the previous study which showed that the rfa1-t11 with reduced Ddc2-focus formation in nuclei weakly suppresses the dmc1-induced delay50. Importantly, the Rfa1 depletion did not affect the accumulation of ssDNAs in the dmc1 cells with persistent unrepaired DSBs. This is particularly important since mutations in DDR genes such as RAD17, -24, DDC1, and MEC3 even in the MEC1 gene bypass the dmc1-induced arrest by repairing DSBs by an alternative pathway such as ectopic recombination46,48,66. The results described here supported the idea that RPA is a sensor for ssDNAs, which creates a scaffold for the assembly of checkpoint effectors such as Mec1-Ddc2(ATR-ATRIP). In meiosis, meiosis-specific Mek1 is activated through the phosphorylation of Hop1 by Mec1 kinase36. The Rfa1-depletion induces rapid dephosphorylation of Hop1 and the dissociation from meiotic chromosomes without affecting the protein level, suggesting the presence of an active de-phosphorylation pathway of Hop1.
The chromosome synapsis checkpoint in yeast meiosis
In addition to the recombination checkpoint, meiotic cells respond to abnormal chromosome synapsis, which is called synapsis checkpoint. This idea was proposed that mutants defective in chromosome synapsis show a delay in the progression of prophase I and apoptosis in yeasts and mice or nematodes, respectively. However, the presence of the synapsis checkpoint is still under debate42,43, since in most organisms meiotic recombination and chromosome synapsis are tightly coupled. The budding yeast zip1 mutant, which is completely defective in SC formation, thus, chromosome synapsis, delays or arrest in meiotic prophase I41,45. This arrest is alleviated by the mutant of genes encoding a component of checkpoint such as PCH267. Pch2 modulates Hop1 conformation and regulates the association and dissociation of Hop1 on meiotic chromosomes61,68,69. On the other hand, the zip1 mutant also shows defective DSB repair and/or the crossing-over44,45, which suggests delayed progression of meiosis I in the zip1 mutant is caused by the impaired recombination. In this study, by using the RFA1-AID, we could test whether the delay in zip1 mutant depends on RPA or not and found that the Rfa1-depletion eliminates the delay induced by the zip1 mutation. This strongly suggests that the recombination checkpoint delays the meiosis I progression in the zip1 mutant as seen in the dmc1 mutant. Moreover, consistent with this, the other yeast mutants, which are fully defective in the synapsis with a weak recombination defect such as ecm11 and gmc2, do not show a drastic delay in the meiosis I progression70,71. Thus, at least in budding yeast which couples the recombination and chromosome synapsis, rather than the status of chromosome synapsis, a recombination process, the presence of ssDNAs, can be monitored by a meiosis-specific surveillance mechanism to guarantee the completion of meiotic recombination directly and chromosome synapsis indirectly. Our idea is consistent with the idea proposed by recent reports claiming the merging of the recombination and synapsis checkpoints in meiosis61,72.
Methods
Strains and plasmids
All strains described here are derivatives of S. cerevisiae SK1 diploids, MSY832/833 (MATα/MATa, lys2/’’, ura3/’’, leu2::hisG/’’, trp1::hisG/’’). The genotypes of each strain used in this study are described in Supplementary Table S1.
Strain Construction
The RFA1-AID gene was constructed by one-step DNA integration. The AID-9Myc tag was added to the C-terminus of the RFA1 open reading frame by the transformation of yeast cells (MSY823) with a DNA fragment amplified by PCR using p7AID-9myc (provided by Dr. Neil Hunter) as a template and a pair of primers (Rfa1-AID-Hygoro-F and -R in Supplementary Table S2). The transformants were selected against hygromycin. Genomic DNAs from the candidate colonies were purified and the genomic DNAs were checked for the correct tagging by PCR and DNA sequencing using the primer described in Supplementary Table S2.
Anti-serum and antibodies
Anti-myc (9E10, sc-40, Santa Cruz), anti-tubulin (MCA77G, Bio-Rad/Serotec, Ltd), anti-Cdc5 (sc-33625, Santa Cruz), and histone H3 phospho-T11 (ab5168, Abcam) were used for western blotting. Rabbit anti-Rad5121 and guinea pig anti-Rad5173, rabbit anti-Hop174 and rabbit anti-Rfa275 were home-made and used for staining. Rabbit anti-Ndt80 was a gift by M. Lichten. The secondary antibodies for immuno-staining were Alexa Fluor 488 (Goat, A-21206, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 594 (Goat, A-211012, Thermo Fisher Scientific) IgG used at a 1/2000 dilution. For western blotting, alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Promega) were used.
Meiotic Time course
Saccharomyces cerevisiae SK1 strains were patched onto YPG plates (2% bacteriological peptone, 1% yeast extract, 3% glycerol, 2% bacteriological agar) and incubated at 30 °C for 12 h. Cells were inoculated onto YPD plates (2% bacteriological peptone, 1% yeast extract, 2% glucose, 2% bacteriological agar) and grown for two days to obtain isolated colonies. A single colony was inoculated into 3 ml of YPD liquid medium and grown to saturation at 30 °C overnight. To synchronize cell cultures, the overnight cultures were transferred to pre-warmed SPS medium (1% potassium acetate, 1% bacteriological peptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.17% yeast nitrogen base with ammonium sulfate and without amino acids, 0.5% ammonium sulfate, 0.05 M potassium biphthalate) and grown for 16–17 h. Meiosis was induced by transferring the SPS-cultured cells to pre-warmed SPM (1% potassium acetate, 0.02% raffinose). The SPM-cultured cells were harvested at various times after transfer. For Rfa1 depletion from 4 h, CuSO4 was added to 50 mM at 3.5 h. Auxin (3-indoleacetic acid) solved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added at a final concentration of 2 mM at 4 h. In the control experiment (without auxin), we added an equivalent DMSO solution alone.
Cytology
Chromosome spreads were immunostained as described previously48,73. Spheroplasts were burst in the presence of 1% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% lipsol. The spreads were stained with primary and secondary antibodies observed using a fluorescence microscope (BX51; Olympus/Evident) with a 100 × objective (NA1.3). Images were captured by CCD camera (CoolSNAP; Roper), and then processed using IP lab and/or iVision (Bio Vision Technologies) and Photoshop (version, 25.4.0; Adobe; https://www.adobe.com) software. For focus counting, ~ 30 nuclei were counted at each time point.
Whole-cell staining was carried out as follows. Yeast cells are fixed with formaldehyde (a final concentration of 3.7%) and collected. The pellets were suspended in the ZK buffer (25 mM Tris–HCl [pH 7.5], 80 mM KCl) and treated with DTT (20 mM) and then with Zymolyase 100 T (2.5 μg/ml). After washing with PBS, the cells were placed on a glass slide coated with poly-lysine (1 mg/ml). The cells were treated with cold ethanol (100% 6 min) and acetone (100% 0.5 min), and washed with PBS. After blocking with PBS with 1% BSA, cells were stained with primary and secondary antibodies.
Western blotting
Western blotting was performed as described previously22,76, using cell lysates extracted by the TCA method. After being harvested and washed twice with 20% TCA, cells were roughly disrupted with zirconia beads by the Multi-beads shocker (Yasui Kikai). The protein precipitate recovered by centrifugation was suspended in SDS-PAGE sample buffer adjusted to pH 8.8 and then incubated at 95 °C for 10 min. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred onto a nylon membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore) and incubated with primary antibodies in a blocking buffer (1 × PBS, 0.5% BSA) and then with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody (Promega). The color reaction was developed with NBT/BCIP solution (Nacalai Tesque).
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
For pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), chromosomal DNA was prepared in 1.3% of low-melting point agarose plugs as described in74 and run at 14 °C with 1X TBE buffer in a CHEF DR-III apparatus (BioRad) using the field 6 V/cm at a 120°angle for 48 h. Switching times followed a ramp from 15.1 to 25.1 s. After the electrophoresis, the gel was stained with 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide for 30 min and washed with distilled water. Images were taken using ImageQuant LAS4000 BioImager (GE Healthcare).
FACS analysis
Cells in 1 ml of SPM culture were collected by centrifugation. The pellet was then resuspended in 1 ml of 70% ethanol. Fixed cells were recollected and washed by suspending 1 ml of 50 mM sodium citrate buffer. The collected cells were resuspended in 0.5 ml of sodium citrate buffer and sonicated for the 20 s at room temperature. Sonicated cells were incubated with 12.5 μl of 10 mg/mL RNAseA for 1 h at 50 °C and in 25 μl of 15 mg/ml proteinase K for 1 h at 50 °C. 0.5 ml of 16 μlg/ml PI solution was added and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The samples were then analyzed using SA-3800 Spectral analyzer (Sony). Floreada.io was used for gating and plotting graphs.
Data availability
Uncropped western blotting images are provided in Supplementary Figures. The raw data used in plots and graphs are also shown in Source Data. The raw microscopy images used for figures and quantification are available from corresponding authors upon request.
References
Bhat, K. P. & Cortez, D. RPA and RAD51: Fork reversal, fork protection, and genome stability. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 446–453. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-018-0075-z (2018).
Caldwell, C. C. & Spies, M. Dynamic elements of replication protein A at the crossroads of DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 55, 482–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409238.2020.1813070 (2020).
Wold, M. S. Replication protein A: A heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.61 (1997).
Brill, S. J. & Stillman, B. Replication factor-A from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is encoded by three essential genes coordinately expressed at S phase. Genes Dev. 5, 1589–1600. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.5.9.1589 (1991).
Zou, L. & Elledge, S. J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542–1548. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083430 (2003).
Chen, H., Lisby, M. & Symington, L. S. RPA coordinates DNA end resection and prevents formation of DNA hairpins. Mol. Cell 50, 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.04.032 (2013).
Sasanuma, H. et al. A new protein complex promoting the assembly of Rad51 filaments. Nat. Commun. 4, 1676. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2678 (2013).
Shinohara, A. & Ogawa, T. Stimulation by Rad52 of yeast Rad51-mediated recombination. Nature 391, 404–407. https://doi.org/10.1038/34943 (1998).
Sung, P. Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11, 1111–1121. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.9.1111 (1997).
Sung, P. Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science 265, 1241–1243. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8066464 (1994).
Friedel, A. M., Pike, B. L. & Gasser, S. M. ATR/Mec1: Coordinating fork stability and repair. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.017 (2009).
Williams, R. M., Yates, L. A. & Zhang, X. Structures and regulations of ATM and ATR, master kinases in genome integrity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 61, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.010 (2020).
Biswas, H., Goto, G., Wang, W., Sung, P. & Sugimoto, K. Ddc2ATRIP promotes Mec1ATR activation at RPA-ssDNA tracts. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008294 (2019).
Deshpande, I. et al. Structural basis of Mec1-Ddc2-RPA assembly and activation on single-stranded DNA at sites of damage. Mol. Cell 68, 431-445e435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.019 (2017).
Yates, L. A., Tannous, E. A., Morgan, R. M., Burgers, P. M. & Zhang, X. A DNA damage-induced phosphorylation circuit enhances Mec1(ATR) Ddc2(ATRIP) recruitment to Replication Protein A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 120, e2300150120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2300150120 (2023).
Bass, T. E. et al. ETAA1 acts at stalled replication forks to maintain genome integrity. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3415 (2016).
Haahr, P. et al. Activation of the ATR kinase by the RPA-binding protein ETAA1. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1196–1207. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3422 (2016).
Bergerat, A. et al. An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386, 414–417. https://doi.org/10.1038/386414a0 (1997).
Keeney, S., Giroux, C. N. & Kleckner, N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88, 375–384 (1997).
Bishop, D. K., Park, D., Xu, L. & Kleckner, N. DMC1: A meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 69, 439–456 (1992).
Shinohara, A., Ogawa, H. & Ogawa, T. Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein. Cell 69, 457–470 (1992).
Hayase, A. et al. A protein complex containing Mei5 and Sae3 promotes the assembly of the meiosis-specific RecA homolog Dmc1. Cell 119, 927–940 (2004).
Tsubouchi, H. & Roeder, G. S. The budding yeast mei5 and sae3 proteins act together with dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Genetics 168, 1219–1230. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.103.025700 (2004).
Hong, S. et al. The logic and mechanism of homologous recombination partner choice. Mol. Cell 51, 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.008 (2013).
Kim, K. P. et al. Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell 143, 924–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.015 (2010).
Niu, H. et al. Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 5804–5818. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e05-05-0465 (2005).
Leem, S. H. & Ogawa, H. The MRE4 gene encodes a novel protein kinase homologue required for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/20.3.449 (1992).
Rockmill, B. & Roeder, G. S. A meiosis-specific protein kinase homolog required for chromosome synapsis and recombination. Genes Dev. 5, 2392–2404. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.5.12b.2392 (1991).
Callender, T. L. et al. Mek1 down regulates Rad51 activity during yeast meiosis by phosphorylation of Hed1. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006226 (2016).
Niu, H. et al. Regulation of meiotic recombination via Mek1-mediated Rad54 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 36, 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.029 (2009).
Shinohara, M. et al. Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homologue of RAD54, RDH54/TID1, in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics 147, 1545–1556. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/147.4.1545 (1997).
Tsubouchi, H. & Roeder, G. S. Budding yeast Hed1 down-regulates the mitotic recombination machinery when meiotic recombination is impaired. Genes Dev. 20, 1766–1775. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1422506 (2006).
Borner, G. V., Hochwagen, A. & MacQueen, A. J. Meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad125 (2023).
Cartagena-Lirola, H., Guerini, I., Manfrini, N., Lucchini, G. & Longhese, M. P. Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 checkpoint kinase in signaling double-strand breaks during the meiotic cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 4480–4493. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00375-08 (2008).
Usui, T. & Shinohara, A. Rad9, a 53BP1 ortholog of budding yeast, Is insensitive to Spo11-induced double-strand breaks during meiosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 635383. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.635383 (2021).
Carballo, J. A., Johnson, A. L., Sedgwick, S. G. & Cha, R. S. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132, 758–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.035 (2008).
Hollingsworth, N. M. Mek1/Mre4 is a master regulator of meiotic recombination in budding yeast. Microb. Cell 3, 129–131. https://doi.org/10.15698/mic2016.03.487 (2016).
Chen, X. et al. Mek1 coordinates meiotic progression with DNA break repair by directly phosphorylating and inhibiting the yeast pachytene exit regulator Ndt80. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007832 (2018).
Hochwagen, A. Meiosis: Making a synaptonemal complex just got easier. Curr. Biol. 19, R849-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.001 (2009).
Sourirajan, A. & Lichten, M. Polo-like kinase Cdc5 drives exit from pachytene during budding yeast meiosis. Genes Dev. 22, 2627–2632. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1711408 (2008).
Sym, M., Engebrecht, J. A. & Roeder, G. S. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 72, 365–378 (1993).
Huang, Y. & Roig, I. Genetic control of meiosis surveillance mechanisms in mammals. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 1127440. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1127440 (2023).
MacQueen, A. J. & Hochwagen, A. Checkpoint mechanisms: The puppet masters of meiotic prophase. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.004 (2011).
Borner, G. V., Kleckner, N. & Hunter, N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117, 29–45 (2004).
Storlazzi, A., Xu, L., Schwacha, A. & Kleckner, N. Synaptonemal complex (SC) component Zip1 plays a role in meiotic recombination independent of SC polymerization along the chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9043–9048. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.17.9043 (1996).
Grushcow, J. M. et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice. Genetics 153, 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/153.2.607 (1999).
Shinohara, M., Hayashihara, K., Grubb, J. T., Bishop, D. K. & Shinohara, A. DNA damage response clamp 9–1-1 promotes assembly of ZMM proteins for formation of crossovers and synaptonemal complex. J. Cell Sci. 128, 1494–1506. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.161554 (2015).
Shinohara, M., Sakai, K., Ogawa, T. & Shinohara, A. The mitotic DNA damage checkpoint proteins Rad17 and Rad24 are required for repair of double-strand breaks during meiosis in yeast. Genetics 164, 855–865. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/164.3.855 (2003).
Kim, H. S. & Brill, S. J. Rfc4 interacts with Rpa1 and is required for both DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 3725–3737. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.11.3725-3737.2001 (2001).
Refolio, E., Cavero, S., Marcon, E., Freire, R. & San-Segundo, P. A. The Ddc2/ATRIP checkpoint protein monitors meiotic recombination intermediates. J. Cell Sci. 124, 2488–2500. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.081711 (2011).
Joo, J. H. et al. RPA interacts with Rad52 to promote meiotic crossover and noncrossover recombination. Nucleic Acids Res https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae083 (2024).
Shi, B. et al. Dual functions for the ssDNA-binding protein RPA in meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet. 15, e1007952. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007952 (2019).
Nishimura, K., Fukagawa, T., Takisawa, H., Kakimoto, T. & Kanemaki, M. An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat. Methods 6, 917–922. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1401 (2009).
Chu, S. et al. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 282, 699–705. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5389.699 (1998).
Gasior, S. L., Wong, A. K., Kora, Y., Shinohara, A. & Bishop, D. K. Rad52 associates with RPA and functions with rad55 and rad57 to assemble meiotic recombination complexes. Genes Dev. 12, 2208–2221. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.14.2208 (1998).
Bishop, D. K. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 79, 1081–1092 (1994).
Hollingsworth, N. M., Goetsch, L. & Byers, B. The HOP1 gene encodes a meiosis-specific component of yeast chromosomes. Cell 61, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90216-2 (1990).
Smith, A. V. & Roeder, G. S. The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 136, 957–967. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.136.5.957 (1997).
Kniewel, R. et al. Histone H3 threonine 11 phosphorylation is catalyzed directly by the meiosis-specific kinase Mek1 and provides a molecular readout of Mek1 activity in vivo. Genetics 207, 1313–1333. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.117.300359 (2017).
Shinohara, A., Gasior, S., Ogawa, T., Kleckner, N. & Bishop, D. K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae recA homologues RAD51 and DMC1 have both distinct and overlapping roles in meiotic recombination. Genes Cells 2, 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.1480347.x (1997).
Raina, V. B. & Vader, G. Homeostatic control of meiotic prophase checkpoint function by Pch2 and Hop1. Curr. Biol. 30, 4413-4424e4415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.064 (2020).
Hollingsworth, N. M. & Gaglione, R. The meiotic-specific Mek1 kinase in budding yeast regulates interhomolog recombination and coordinates meiotic progression with double-strand break repair. Curr. Genet. 65, 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-019-00937-3 (2019).
Alani, E., Padmore, R. & Kleckner, N. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell 61, 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90524-i (1990).
Usui, T., Ogawa, H. & Petrini, J. H. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7, 1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00270-2 (2001).
Lin, Y. et al. APE1 recruits ATRIP to ssDNA in an RPA-dependent and -independent manner to promote the ATR DNA damage response. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82324 (2023).
Shinohara, M., Bishop, D. K. & Shinohara, A. Distinct functions in regulation of meiotic crossovers for DNA damage response clamp loader Rad24(Rad17) and Mec1(ATR) kinase. Genetics 213, 1255–1269. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.119.302427 (2019).
San-Segundo, P. A. & Roeder, G. S. Pch2 links chromatin silencing to meiotic checkpoint control. Cell 97, 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80741-2 (1999).
Borner, G. V., Barot, A. & Kleckner, N. Yeast Pch2 promotes domainal axis organization, timely recombination progression, and arrest of defective recombinosomes during meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 3327–3332. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711864105 (2008).
Herruzo, E. et al. The Pch2 AAA+ ATPase promotes phosphorylation of the Hop1 meiotic checkpoint adaptor in response to synaptonemal complex defects. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 7722–7741. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw506 (2016).
Humphryes, N. et al. The Ecm11-Gmc2 complex promotes synaptonemal complex formation through assembly of transverse filaments in budding yeast. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003194 (2013).
Lee, M. S. et al. The synaptonemal complex central region modulates crossover pathways and feedback control of meiotic double-strand break formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 7537–7553. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab566 (2021).
Gonzalez-Arranz, S. et al. Functional impact of the H2A.Z histone variant during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 209, 997–1015. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.301110 (2018).
Shinohara, M., Gasior, S. L., Bishop, D. K. & Shinohara, A. Tid1/Rdh54 promotes colocalization of rad51 and dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 10814–10819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.20.10814 (2000).
Bani Ismail, M., Shinohara, M. & Shinohara, A. Dot1-dependent histone H3K79 methylation promotes the formation of meiotic double-strand breaks in the absence of histone H3K4 methylation in budding yeast. PLoS One 9, e96648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096648 (2014).
Sasanuma, H., Furihata, Y., Shinohara, M. & Shinohara, A. Remodeling of the Rad51 DNA strand-exchange protein by the Srs2 helicase. Genetics 194, 859–872. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.150615 (2013).
Shinohara, M., Oh, S. D., Hunter, N. & Shinohara, A. Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis. Nat. Genet. 40, 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.83 (2008).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Drs. Neil Hunter for providing the yeast AID system and Michael Lichten for anti-Ndt80. A.Sa. is a JICA fellow. Y.F. and M.I. were supported by the Institute for Protein Research. This work was supported by a grant from Institute for Fermentation, Osaka (IFO) and from Uehara Memorial Foundation to Life Sciences; to A.Sh.
Funding
Funding was provided by Institute for Fermentation, Osaka grant no.G-2023-2-016, Uehara Memorial Foundation grant no. 202220344 and Japan International Cooperation Agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.Sh. conceived and designed the experiments. A.Sa., Z.C., and Y.T. carried out experiments with help from Y.F. and M.I.. A.Sa, Z.C., Y.T., Y.F., M.I., and A.Sh. analyzed the data. A.Sh. wrote the manuscript with inputs from help from others.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sampathkumar, A., Zhong, C., Tang, Y. et al. Replication protein-A, RPA, plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of recombination checkpoint in yeast meiosis. Sci Rep 14, 9550 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60082-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60082-x
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.