Abstract
To quickly screen for single-phased multi-principal-element materials, a so-called entropy forming ability (EFA) parameter is sometimes used as a descriptor. The larger the EFA, the larger is the propensity to form a single-phase structure. We have investigated this EFA descriptor with atomic relaxations in special-quasi-random structures and discovered that the EFA correlates inversely with the lattice distortion. Large effective atomic size differences lead to multi-phase compounds, and little size differences to single-phase compounds. Instead of configurational entropy, we therefore demonstrate the applicability of the Hume-Rothery rules to phase stability of solid solutions even in compositionally complex ceramics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The discovery of stable ceramic high-entropy materials is a daunting task due to the vast combinatorial space to search in. To speed up the exploration, we rely on descriptors that allow a rough estimate of the chance of success with low effort. One such example is the Hume-Rothery rules1, that provide a simple physical explanation for the formation of solid solutions in metals.
Of these Hume-Rothery rules, the size difference between constituting atoms, abbreviated with \(\delta\), is most often used as descriptor to describe the propensity to form solid solutions in not only metallic, but also ceramic high-entropy materials. For example, Zhang et al2. used a data-driven approach to determine suitable elements for compositionally complex sulfides, while Jiang et al3. and Spiridigliozzi et al4.investigated the single-phase synthesis of complex oxides in perovskite and fluorite structure, respectively. Yan et al5. found that the formation of complex single-phase borides depends strongly on the deviation of the metal-B bond lengths. Tang et al6. used the bond strength in addition to the bond length to predict properties of carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, while Liu et al7.formulated a modified \(\delta\) parameter which also takes the shear modulus mismatch into account. Zhou et al8. found that the most important features in predicting hardness and Young’s modulus in carbides with high configurational entropy are the valence electron concentration, the deviation of melting temperatures, and the fraction-weighted mean total energies, while atomic size differences plays a minor, but still significant role.
In contrast, the entropy forming ability (EFA)9 was formulated as a new descriptor for entropy stabilized compounds, and is sometimes interpreted as a driving force for local ordering, where a sufficiently large value indicates the propensity to form a single-phase solid solution due to configurational entropy. Compared to previous descriptors like the Hume-Rothery rules, the configurational entropy is claimed to be driving mechanism here. Intrigued by this descriptor, we investigated the same carbides as Sarker et al9. with ab initio calculations—implementing special quasi-random structures (SQS)—to analyze the local lattice distortion in order to develop a better understanding of the EFA.
Methods
We performed all ab initio calculations using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)10,11 with projector-augmented plane wave pseudo-potentials with generalized gradient approximated exchange-correlation functionals12. To analyze the local distortions in the structures, we used \(2\times 2\times 2\) SQS supercells13,14, adapting our method established in15 for nitrides to the relevant 5-metal carbides in the phase space of Hf, Mo, Nb, Ta, Ti, V, W, and Zr. To improve the statistical ensemble, we have calculated 10 independent 64-atom cells per composition and use average values over these 10 cells. k-meshes16 and other details of the calculations can be found in the supplementary material. We quantify the local lattice distortion with a radial distribution function, in which the parameter \(\sigma _1\) describes the distribution of bond lengths in the first coordination sphere (nearest neighbors),
so that a large effective atomic size mismatch leads to large values of \(\sigma _1\), with \(r_{0,i}\) as the mean bond length of the ith coordination sphere, \(a_i\) as a fitting parameter for the distribution peak height, and \(\sigma _i^2\) as the variance of the ith-neighbor bond length distribution. We contrast this parameter with the commonly used nominal deviation of the average atomic radius \(\delta\),
where \(X_i\) is the mole fraction of the ith component, \(r_i\) the nearest neighbor C-metal bond length of the ith metal, and \(\overline{r}\) the average nearest neighbor C-metal bond length of all metals present17. Since the actual atomic radii in ceramics can deviate from the radii tabulated for metals, we use the metal-carbon bond lengths of the respective binary face-centered cubic (fcc, NaCl prototype) cells instead of tabulated values to calculate \(\delta\).
To complement and confirm our results, we have run more SQS calculations on multicomponent carbides in the same phase space with 2, 3, and 4 metals, and compared the resulting lattice distortion with EFA calculations, which we have prepared with the AFLOW-POCC18 module, which results in 2, 3, and 18 individual ordered structures for carbides with 2, 3, and 4 metals, respectively. Structure files and parameters for all calculations are listed in the supplementary materials.
Results and discussion
We have mapped the correlation between \(\sigma _1\) and the EFA of the 56 compounds studied in9 in Fig. 1a. The stated threshold for single-phase structures is at EFA= 50 (eV/atom)\(^{-1}\), which is shown as a dashed line. A power law fit (red line) illustrates that large lattice distortions occur only in compositions with small EFA values. Our data demonstrates that the EFA correlates with size effects of the constituting atoms, which has not been recognized before.
Sarker et al9. have argued that the formation of a single-phase (Mo,Nb,Ta,V,W)C is counter-intuitive with the argument, that two of the constituting metals, W, and Mo, prefer other structures and stoichiometric ratios. Our structural data helps to understand this oddity, showing that from the point of atomic size mismatch, the only moderate lattice distortion allows the formation of a single-phase material with these metals. This is especially true, if synthesis techniques such as spark plasma sintering or physical vapor deposition with their very fast cooling rates are used, allowing for kinetically-limited single-phase stabilization.
There is significant scattering in the data, causing the exemplary fitting function to display an \(R^2\) score of only 0.58, but this fit is only intended to show the general trend. One source of this scattering we found to be in the EFA calculations, which are extremely sensitive to the convergence parameters. The total energies of the individual relaxed cells that we have calculated differ only by magnitudes in the meV range, so that slightly different—but high—stopping criteria for relaxation can lead to wildly different EFA scores. We therefore advise utmost caution when calculating this descriptor.
The other source of scattering is the fitting procedure for our \(\sigma _1\) parameter. When the crystalline lattice shows only very little distortion—meaning the peak of the radial distribution function is very narrow—the fitted width of the Gaussian distribution of this narrow peak suffers from numerical inaccuracy, but when the distribution becomes broader, the fit becomes well defined. In effect this means that our \(\sigma _1\) parameter cannot reliably quantify small differences in lattices with low distortion, but is effective at discerning lattices with little distortion from more distorted ones. Applying a similar method for defining a threshold for single-phase structures as Sarker et al9., we use roughly half the distance between the multi-phase and single-phase compositions, which are closest in their EFA values, (HfMoTaWZr)C and (HfTaTiWZr)C, to estimate an approximate threshold of \(\sigma _1\approx\) 0.06Å, shown as a horizontal dashed line in Fig. 1, above which the lattice is too distorted to maintain a single phase. We must stress however, that just like the EFA threshold this is a purely empirical estimation based on rather little data, and thus may not be very reliable.
A simpler approach to the lattice distortion is the nominal size mismatch \(\delta\), which correlates with \(\sigma _1\), see Fig. 1b. Despite using metal-carbon bond lengths as size parameter, the \(\delta\) parameter fails to separate single- and multi-phase compositions. The underlying principle of the Hume-Rothery rules is still valid, but since atomic radii are influenced by local charge transfer19, atomic radii are ill defined in complex solid solutions. Therefore, the simple \(\delta\) parameter fails to capture the chemical complexity involved. Instead, the local relaxations in our SQS cells provide a better guide to real distortions of the lattice and can be used to gauge the single-phase stability.
To confirm our finding, we conducted further calculations of the EFA and \(\sigma _1\) on the multinary carbides with 2, 3, and 4 of the same metals. The correlation between the additional datasets is depicted in Fig. 2a for all multinary levels, demonstrating trends identical to the one shown in Fig. 1a. A power law fit for every multinary level is inserted as guide line with the corresponding color. Please note, that the scaling of the EFA is different in this figure for every multinary level. Thus, an EFA of 50 (eV/atom)\(^{-1}\) is not the general threshold to form a single-phase material.
The relationship between \(\sigma _1\) and \(\delta\) is shown for all considered compositions in Fig. 2b. Large variations in \(\sigma _1\) for a given \(\delta\) demonstrate only a moderate reliability of the \(\delta\) parameter to gauge the actual lattice distortion, local lattice distortions from ab initio calculations were also shown to be useful to estimate the ductility of alloys, whereas \(\delta\) is not accurate enough20. As we would expect, we see a total absence of small lattice distortion in compounds with large differences of atomic radii, which serves as a sanity check that our method works correctly.
Additionally, with the different sizes of the constituting atoms—and thereby roughened crystal planes—we can easily explain the experimental findings presented in9 over the whole data range. While the interplanar spacing \(\epsilon\), taken as the X-ray diffraction-measured reflex width in9, inversely correlates with the EFA for both single- and multi-phased materials, \(\epsilon\) also correlates strongly with the calculated lattice distortion \(\sigma _1\), see Fig. 3a, confirming our calculations.
We can strengthen our argument on size effects by applying the \(\sigma _1\) descriptor to predict the stability of solid solutions for other materials as well. Using the \(\sigma _1\) values of the isostructural nitrides, which we have calculated with the same method in15, we can correlate the lattice distortion in the nitrides with the maximum solubility limit of Al in physical vapor deposited (PVD) (\(\textrm{TM}_{x}\textrm{Al}_{1-x})\textrm{N}\) coatings, see Fig. 3b. These nitrides are only metastable in the B1 structure, since Al strongly favors the hexagonal B4 structure, but the structure can be stabilized kinetically through high-energy bombardment and high cooling rates, which are characteristic for PVD. The extent of this stabilization depends strongly on the transition metal. Extensive studies have been performed on several of these nitrides, most of all (Al,Ti)N21,22,23 and (Al,Cr)N24,25,26, while (Al,V)N27, (Al,Hf)N21,28, (Al,Nb)N29, (Al,Ta)N30,31, and (Al,Zr)N21,32,33 are less explored. Optimizing the deposition parameters influences the maximum solubility limit significantly, but we see a clear trend that the metal pairs with similar atom sizes can stabilize more Al in the B1 structure and this is well reflected in the lattice distortion, parameterized by \(\sigma _1\). In these simple cases, the nominal \(\delta\) parameter would also be sufficient to derive the same conclusion. The analysis of more complex nitrides would be a more interesting exercise, but the Al-solubility limits are not yet explored in these.
Conclusion
The EFA as a descriptor was defined in9 to map the energy cost of accessing metastable configurations. The authors interpreted the agency behind their formed solid solutions as entropy stabilization. Here, we can give a more basic explanation of their finding, namely that this energy cost is directly related to the mismatch in atomic sizes and the resulting lattice distortion. The underlying Hume-Rothery rules for solid solution therefore remain central for the stability of solid solutions also in high-entropy compounds.
Our radial distribution analysis of bond lengths in relaxed special quasi-random structures allows us to capture the atomic size dependent lattice distortion in an easily interpretable way. Since charge transfer in alloys influences the effective atomic sizes, we require this ab initio treatment to demonstrate the relationship between the magnitude of the EFA descriptor and the effective atomic size deviation, while the simple \(\delta\) parameter is not precise enough. We can therefore complement the Hume-Rothery rule regarding the size mismatch, demanding instead of similar atomic radii, a sufficiently small effective lattice distortion. Based on the little available data, we quantify the threshold for the present carbides as \(\sigma _1\approx\) 0.06 Å, below which single phase solid solution carbides can form.
Data availibility
A part of the raw data can be found in the material. More data supporting the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Hume-Rothery, W., Mabbott, G. W. & Channel Evans, K. M. The freezing points melting points and solid solubility limits of the alloys of sliver and copper with the elements of the b sub-groups. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Charact. 233(721–730), 1–97. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1934.0014 (1934).
Zhang, R. Z., Gucci, F., Zhu, H., Chen, K. & Reece, M. J. Data-driven design of ecofriendly thermoelectric high-entropy sulfides. Inorg. Chem. 57(20), 13027–13033. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02379 (2018).
Jiang, S. et al. A new class of high-entropy perovskite oxides. Scripta Mater. 142, 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.040 (2018).
Spiridigliozzi, L., Ferone, C., Cioffi, R. & Dell’Agli, G. A simple and effective predictor to design novel fluorite-structured High Entropy Oxides (HEOs). Acta Mater. 202, 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.061 (2021).
Yan, Y., Pei, Z., Gao, M. C. & Wang, K. Data-driven discovery of a formation prediction rule on high-entropy ceramics. Acta Mater. 253, 118955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118955 (2023).
Tang, Y., Zhang, D., Liu, R. & Li, D. Designing high-entropy ceramics via incorporation of the bond-mechanical behavior correlation with the machine-learning methodology. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2(11), 100640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100640 (2021).
Liu, R. et al. Entropy as a gene-like performance indicator promoting thermoelectric materials. Adv. Mater.https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201702712 (2017).
Zhou, Q. et al. Machine learning-assisted mechanical property prediction and descriptor-property correlation analysis of high-entropy ceramics. Ceram. Int. 49(4), 5760–5769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.105 (2023).
Sarker, P. et al. High-entropy high-hardness metal carbides discovered by entropy descriptors. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07160-7 (2018).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 54(16), 11169–11186. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59(3), 1758–1775. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 (1999).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Wang, Y. Generalized gradient approximation for the exchange-correlation hole of a many-electron system. Phys. Rev. B 54(23), 16533–16539. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.16533 (1996).
Wei, S. H., Ferreira, L. G., Bernard, J. E. & Zunger, A. Electronic properties of random alloys: Special Quasirandom structures. Phys. Rev. B 42(15), 9622–9649. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.9622 (1990).
Gehringer, D., Friák, M. & Holec, D. Models of configurationally-complex alloys made simple. Comput. Phys. Commun.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108664 (2023).
Kretschmer, A. et al. Strain-stabilized Al-containing high-entropy sublattice nitrides. Acta Mater. 224, 117483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117483 (2022).
Pack, J. D. & Monkhorst, H. J. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 16(4), 1748–1749. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.16.1748 (1977).
Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y. J., Lin, J. P., Chen, G. L. & Liaw, P. K. Solid-solution phase formation rules for multi-component alloys. Adv. Eng. Mater. 10(6), 534–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200700240 (2008).
Yang, K., Oses, C. & Curtarolo, S. Modeling off-stoichiometry materials with a high-throughput ab-initio approach. Chem. Mater. 28(18), 6484–6492. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01449 (2016).
Casillas-Trujillo, L. et al. Experimental and theoretical evidence of charge transfer in multi-component alloys’ how chemical interactions reduce atomic size mismatch. Mater. Chem. Front. 5(15), 5746–5759. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1qm00380a (2021).
Singh, P. et al. A ductility metric for refractory-based multi-principal-element alloys. Acta Mater. 257(May), 119104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119104 (2023).
Holec, D. et al. Phase stability and alloy-related trends in Ti-Al-N, Zr-Al-N and Hf-Al-N systems from first principles. Surf. Coat. Technol. 206(7), 1698–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.09.019 (2011).
Wahlström, U. et al. Crystal growth and microstructure of polycrystalline Ti1xAlxN alloy films deposited by ultra-high-vacuum dual-target magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Films 235(1–2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(93)90244-J (1993).
Kutschej, K. et al. Structure, mechanical and tribological properties of sputtered Ti1-xAlxN coatings with 0.5 0.75. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200(7), 2358–2365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.12.008 (2005).
Sugishima, A., Kajioka, H. & Makino, Y. Phase transition of pseudobinary Cr-Al-N films deposited by magnetron sputtering method. Surf. Coat. Technol. 97(1–3), 590–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00402-7 (1997).
Banakh, O., Schmid, P., Sanjinés, R. & Lévy, F. High-temperature oxidation resistance of CrıAl N thin films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering. Surf. Coat. Technol. 163–164, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00589-3 (2003).
Hirai, M. et al. Characteristics of (Cr 1–x, Al x )N films prepared by pulsed laser deposition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40(2S), 1056. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.40.1056 (2001).
Greczynski, G. et al. Unprecedented Al supersaturation in single-phase rock salt structure VAlN films by Al+ subplantation. J. Appl. Phys.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4977813 (2017).
Howe, B. et al. Growth and physical properties of epitaxial metastable Hf1-xAlxN alloys deposited on MgO(001) by ultrahigh vacuum reactive magnetron sputtering. Surf. Coat. Technol. 202(4–7), 809–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.05.079 (2007).
Franz, R., Lechthaler, M., Polzer, C. & Mitterer, C. Structure, mechanical properties and oxidation behaviour of arc-evaporated NbAlN hard coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 204(15), 2447–2453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.01.023 (2010).
Chen, Y.-I., Lin, J.-H. & Chou, C.-C. Oxidation resistance and mechanical properties of Ta-Al-N coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 303, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.03.022 (2016).
Kumar, D. D. et al. Tribochemistry of TaN, TiAlN and TaAlN coatings under ambient atmosphere and high-vacuum sliding conditions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 499, 143989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143989 (2020).
Makino, Y., Mori, M., Miyake, S., Saito, K. & Asami, K. Characterization of Zr-Al-N films synthesized by a magnetron sputtering method. Surf. Coat. Technol. 193(1–3), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.07.036 (2005).
Hasegawa, H., Kawate, M. & Suzuki, T. Effects of Al contents on microstructures of Cr1-Al N and Zr1-Al N films synthesized by cathodic arc method. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200(7), 2409–2413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.208 (2005).
Mikula, M. et al. Thermally induced age hardening in tough Ta-Al-N coatings via spinodal decomposition. J. Appl. Phys.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4981534 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Austrian COMET Program (project K2 InTribology, no. 872176). Computational results have been achieved with the Vienna Scientific Cluster. The authors acknowledge TU Wien Bibliothek for financial support through its Open Access Funding Program and thank David Holec (Montanuniversität Leoben) for valuable discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.K. conceptualized the work and performed the calculations and analysis. P.H.M. provided computational resources and funding and assisted in the analysis. Both authors contributed to writing the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kretschmer, A., Mayrhofer, P.H. Explaining the entropy forming ability for carbides with the effective atomic size mismatch. Sci Rep 14, 7210 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57456-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57456-6
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.