Abstract
The antidiabetic drug pioglitazone ameliorates insulin resistance by activating the transcription factor PPARγ. In addition to its blood glucose–lowering action, pioglitazone exerts pleiotropic effects including amelioration of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The mechanism by which pioglitazone achieves this latter effect has remained unclear, however. We here show that pioglitazone administration increases the amount of linoleic acid (LA) metabolites in adipose tissue of KK-Ay mice. These metabolites are produced by lactic acid bacteria in the gut, and pioglitazone also increased the fraction of Lactobacillus in the gut microbiota. Administration of the LA metabolite HYA (10-hydroxy-cis-12-octadecenoic acid) to C57BL/6 J mice fed a high-fat diet improved liver histology including steatosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis. Gene ontology analysis of RNA-sequencing data for the liver revealed that the top category for genes downregulated by HYA treatment was related to extracellular matrix, and the expression of individual genes related to fibrosis was confirmed to be attenuated by HYA treatment. Mechanistically, HYA suppressed TGF-β–induced Smad3 phosphorylation and fibrosis-related gene expression in human hepatic stellate cells (LX-2). Our results implicate LA metabolites in the mechanism by which pioglitazone ameliorates liver fibrosis, and they suggest that HYA is a potential therapeutic for NAFLD/NASH.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent form of chronic liver disease in industrialized countries, affecting one-fourth of the global population1,2,3. NAFLD is characterized by excessive fat accumulation in the liver related to obesity and insulin resistance, and it is associated with a high rate of type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension4,5,6. It ranges in severity from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is estimated to account for 10% to 20% of NAFLD cases, and it can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma7,8. Although multiple factors—including diet, genetic variants such as those of PNPLA3, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, excessive production of proinflammatory adipokines, chronic inflammation, and gut dysbiosis—have been implicated in the development of NAFLD/NASH9,10,11, the pathology of this condition is complex and not fully understood. There are currently no approved medications for NAFLD/NASH.
Histological features of NASH include steatosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, hepatocyte ballooning, and fibrosis, the latter of which is the strongest predictor of liver-related events and long-term mortality12,13. Intervention to target liver fibrosis may therefore provide new therapeutics for NAFLD/NASH. Various factors and pathways have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis associated with NAFLD/NASH. Activation of hepatic stellate cells and the consequent overproduction of collagen plays a central role in the development of liver fibrosis14, with transforming growth factor–β (TGF-β) being thought to be a key fibrogenic factor that activates hepatic stellate cells through a Smad3-dependent signaling pathway15.
Pioglitazone is widely administered for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. This antidiabetic agent exerts an insulin-sensitizing effect by binding to and activating the transcription factor PPARγ (peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ)16,17. In addition to its lowering of blood glucose concentration, pioglitazone exerts pleiotropic effects including amelioration of NAFLD/NASH18,19,20. Several randomized controlled trials of pioglitazone for the treatment of NAFLD/NASH revealed that, despite the fact that the dose and duration of pioglitazone administration as well as the presence of diabetic complications in the trial subjects differed among the studies, pioglitazone significantly ameliorated liver histology including steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning, and inflammatory cell infiltration compared with placebo21,22,23,24,25,26,27. Furthermore, some studies have shown that pioglitazone ameliorates liver fibrosis22,24,25,26. The mechanisms by which pioglitazone improves these pathological conditions have remained unclear, however.
We previously showed that linoleic acid (LA), which is widely present in edible fats and oils, is saturated by lactic acid bacteria represented by Lactobacillus through a novel metabolic process and that LA metabolites—including hydroxy fatty acids (hydrated fatty acids), oxo fatty acids, and conjugated fatty acids—are produced as intermediates in this process28. Given that the amount of LA metabolites is extremely low in germ-free mice compared with specific pathogen–free mice, these metabolites are thought to be produced by gut microorganisms such as lactic acid bacteria represented by Lactobacillus in the gut28.
In the present study, we performed lipidomics analysis in genetically obese and diabetic KK-Ay mice in order to explore the mechanism by which pioglitazone ameliorates NAFLD/NASH. We found that pioglitazone treatment increased the amount of LA metabolites in adipose tissue of these mice, and that this effect was accompanied by an increase in the fraction of Lactobacillus in the gut microbiota. We therefore also investigated the effect of 10-hydroxy-cis-12-octadecenoic acid (HYA), an LA metabolite, on the development of NAFLD/NASH in a diet-induced mouse model of this condition.
Materials and methods
Animal studies
Male 7-week-old KK-Ay mice were obtained from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan), housed individually, fed a normal diet (CE-2, CLEA Japan), and acclimatized for 1 week. They were then divided into two groups and fed for 4 weeks with either a control diet (CE-2) or the same diet supplemented with 0.01% pioglitazone (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan). Male 4-week-old C57BL/6 J mice obtained from CLEA Japan were similarly acclimatized for 1 week and then divided into four groups that were fed for 26 weeks with either a normal diet (CE-2) or a high-fat diet (HFD32, CLEA Japan) that was supplemented or not with 1% HYA or 1% LA (Noster Inc., Kyoto, Japan). All mice were housed at 21° to 25 °C and maintained on a 12-h-light, 12-h-dark cycle in the animal facility at Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine or University of Shizuoka. All animal experiments were approved by and performed in accordance with the guidelines of ARRIVE, the animal ethics committees of University of Shizuoka (permission no. 215326) and Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine (permission no. P171006). Mice were anaesthetized by isofurane (VIATRIS, Tokyo, Japan) at a flow rate of 1.5 L/min at 2–3% concentration as administered by an animal anesthetizer (SN-487-0 T Air; SHINANO manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan), and then quickly euthanized by cervical dislocation to collect tissues.
Cell culture and treatment
LX-2 human hepatic stellate cells (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were maintained under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (NICHIREI, Tokyo, Japan), penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL). The cells were transferred to 60-mm dishes and cultured to 80% to 90% confluence before experiments.
LC–MS/MS analysis
Deuterated internal standards (d4-leukotriene B4, d8-5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, d4-prostaglandin E2, and d5-resolvin D2) representing each chromatographic region of identified lipid mediators were added (500 pg each) to samples to facilitate quantification. Samples were subjected to solid-phase extraction on a C18 column as described previously29 and were then analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) with a Qtrap 6500 instrument (Sciex, Framingham, Massachusetts, USA) equipped with an LC-30AD high-performance LC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). A Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (100 by 4.6 mm, 3.5 mm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was subjected to elution with a gradient of methanol/water/acetic acid (v/v/v) from 55:45:0.01 to 98:2:0.01 at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. For monitoring and quantification of the targeted lipid mediators, a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method was developed with signature ion pairs Q1 (parent ion)/Q3 (characteristic fragment ion) for each molecule. Identification of each lipid mediator was based on published criteria for LC retention time, specific fragmentation pattern, and at least six diagnostic fragmentation ions. Quantification was performed on the basis of peak area on the MRM chromatograph, with linear calibration curves being obtained with authentic standards for each compound. Under these conditions, HYA and 10-hydroxy-trans-11-octadecenoic acid (HYC) were not clearly separated and expressed as HYA + HYC.
Analysis of fecal microbiota
Fecal samples were collected at 3 weeks after the onset of pioglitazone treatment and stored at − 80 °C until analysis. Extraction of DNA, 16S rRNA gene amplification, and sequencing with the MiSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were performed by Bioengineering Lab. Co. (Kanagawa, Japan).
Blood parameters
Blood glucose concentration was measured with a Glutest kit (Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Nagoya, Japan), plasma insulin concentration with a Mouse Insulin ELISA kit (Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden), and plasma aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), triglyceride, cholesterol, and nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels with Transaminase CII, Triglyceride E, Cholesterol E, and NEFA C test kits (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical).
Histological analysis
Serial sections of the liver were stained with hematoxylin-eosin or Masson’s trichrome according to standard techniques.
RNA extraction, RNA-seq analysis, and RT-qPCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from the liver or cultured cells with the use of an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands). Construction of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) libraries and sequencing with the Illumina HiSeq-PE150 platform were performed by Novogene (Beijing, China). Relative gene expression was evaluated on the basis of transcripts per million (TPM). For reverse transcription (RT) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis, isolated RNA was subjected to RT with the use of Prime Script RT Master Mix (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) and the resulting cDNA was subjected to real-time PCR analysis with TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Takara Bio) in a Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System III (Takara Bio). Relative mRNA abundance was determined by the standard curve method, with normalization according to the amount of Rplp0 mRNA. The sequences of the PCR primers are provided in Supplemental Table S1.
Immunoblot analysis
Immunoblot analysis was performed as described previously30. In brief, cells were lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The lysates were fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane for immunoblot analysis with antibodies to total or phosphorylated (Ser423/425) forms of Smad3 (Cell Signaling Technology).
Statistical analysis
Quantitative data are presented as means ± SEM and were compared between or among groups with the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test or by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, respectively. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Pioglitazone treatment increases the amount of LA metabolites in adipose tissue of KK-Ay mice
To clarify the mechanism underlying the amelioration of NAFLD/NASH by pioglitazone, we performed lipidomics analysis of adipose tissue, the target tissue of pioglitazone, in KK-Ay mice treated with this antidiabetic agent for 4 weeks. Compared with control mice, pioglitazone-treated mice showed significant increases in the abundance of gut microbial LA metabolites including HYA + HYC, 10-hydroxy-octadecanoic acid (HYB), 10-oxo-cis-12-octadecenoic acid (KetoA), 10-oxo-octadecanoic acid (KetoB), and 10-oxo-trans-11-octadecenoic acid (KetoC) (Fig. 1A). Given that these metabolites are produced from LA by lactic acid bacteria represented by Lactobacillus in the gut28, we hypothesized that pioglitazone might affect the gut microbiota. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicons derived from feces revealed a substantial increase in the fraction of Lactobacillus in KK-Ay mice treated with pioglitazone for 3 weeks compared with control mice (Fig. 1B). These results thus suggested that pioglitazone treatment increases the gut microbial LA metabolite content in adipose tissue by influencing the gut microbiota.
HYA ameliorates liver fibrosis in mice fed a high-fat diet
To study whether LA metabolites contribute to the amelioration of NAFLD/NASH by pioglitazone, we investigated the effects of HYA, a major gut microbial LA metabolite28, in C57BL/6 J mice fed a high-fat diet for a prolonged period. The gain in body weight was significantly suppressed in mice fed a high-fat diet supplemented with HYA compared with those fed the high-fat diet alone (control), whereas similar administration of LA had no such effect (Fig. 2A). Food intake did not differ between HYA- or LA-treated mice and control mice (Supplemental Figure S1A). Whereas blood glucose concentrations also did not differ among these three groups of mice, the plasma insulin concentration at 8 and 16 weeks after treatment onset was significantly lower in HYA-treated mice than in control mice (Fig. 2B and C), suggesting that HYA attenuates insulin resistance. The plasma concentrations of triglyceride, cholesterol, and NEFA did not differ among control and LA- or HYA-treated mice (Supplemental Figure S1B–D). The mass of subcutaneous adipose tissue was decreased and that of epididymal adipose tissue was slightly but significantly increased in HYA-treated mice compared with control mice at 26 weeks after treatment initiation (Fig. 2D).
The increase in plasma levels of AST and ALT induced by the high-fat diet was significantly attenuated by HYA treatment for 24 weeks but was unaffected by LA administration (Fig. 3A and B). Liver weight was also suppressed in HYA-treated mice compared with control mice (Fig. 3C). Histological analysis revealed mild fibrosis as well as micro- and macrovesicular steatosis and inflammatory cell infiltration in the liver of control mice. HYA administration for 26 weeks markedly ameliorated these histological features of the liver, whereas LA administration had no such effect (Fig. 3D and E). The LA metabolite HYA thus specifically ameliorated hepatic histological changes induced by long-term feeding with a high-fat diet.
HYA treatment suppresses the expression of fibrosis-related genes in the liver of mice fed a high-fat diet
To elucidate the mechanism by which HYA improves hepatic histology in mice fed a high-fat diet, we investigated gene expression profiles of the liver by RNA-seq analysis. The pattern of gene expression differed greatly between mice fed a normal diet and those fed a high-fat diet (Fig. 4A and B). Whereas LA treatment did not affect the pattern of hepatic gene expression in high-fat diet–fed mice, HYA treatment altered such gene expression so that the pattern more closely resembled that of mice fed a normal diet (Fig. 4A and B). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the RNA-seq data revealed that the top two categories were extracellular matrix (ECM) and proteinaceous ECM for genes upregulated by feeding a high-fat diet as well as for genes downregulated by HYA treatment (Fig. 4C). Excessive accumulation of ECM in the liver due to an imbalance between its production and degradation contributes to the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis31,32. Indeed, RT-qPCR analysis showed that mRNA abundance for genes related to fibrosis—such as those for collagen (Col1a1, Col1a2, and Col3a1), α–smooth muscle actin (Acta2), TGF-β1 (Tgfb1), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (Timp1)—was markedly decreased in the liver of HYA-treated mice compared with that of control mice (Fig. 4D). Hepatic expression of genes related to steatosis tended to be decreased in HYA-treated mice compared with control mice, but the differences did not achieve statistical significance (Fig. 4D). With regard to inflammation-related genes, hepatic expression of the monocyte chemoattractant protein–1 gene (Mcp1) was significantly decreased and that of the interleukin-6 gene (Il6) tended to be decreased in HYA-treated mice compared with control mice (Fig. 4D). Together, these results suggested that HYA treatment ameliorates liver fibrosis induced by a high-fat diet.
HYA suppresses activation of TGF-β–Smad3 signaling in hepatic stellate cells
Hepatic fibrosis involves activation of hepatic stellate cells and consequent enhancement of ECM production14. TGF-β is a key fibrogenic factor that activates hepatic stellate cells and promotes fibrosis through a Smad3-dependent pathway15. To uncover the mechanism by which HYA ameliorates liver fibrosis, we examined its effect on TGF-β signaling and action in LX-2 human hepatic stellate cells. TGF-β induced the phosphorylation of Smad3 in these cells, and this effect was suppressed by HYA (Fig. 5A). In addition, HYA treatment attenuated the induction of fibrosis-related gene expression by TGF-β in LX-2 cells, whereas LA treatment had a lesser or no such effect (Fig. 5B). These results suggested that HYA ameliorates liver fibrosis through suppression of the TGF-β–Smad3 signaling pathway in hepatic stellate cells.
Discussion
Several clinical studies have shown that pioglitazone improves liver histology in NAFLD/NASH21,22,23,24,25,26,27, but the mechanism of this effect has remained unknown. We have now shown that pioglitazone treatment increased the concentration of LA metabolites in adipose tissue of KK-Ay mice. This effect was accompanied by an increase in the fraction of Lactobacillus in the gut microbiota. Furthermore, administration of the LA metabolite HYA attenuated hepatic histological changes including fibrosis in C57BL/6 J mice fed a high-fat diet. Finally, HYA attenuated the induction of fibrosis-related gene expression through suppression of TGF-β signaling. Our results thus implicate the LA metabolite HYA in the mechanism by which pioglitazone ameliorates NAFLD/NASH.
HYA administration markedly improved liver histology including steatosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis in mice fed a high-fat diet. Whereas GO analysis of RNA-seq data showed that a high-fat diet induced substantial upregulation of the expression of ECM-related genes, consistent with the results of previous studies33,34, the expression of such genes was normalized by concomitant HYA administration. Given that excessive production of ECM by hepatic stellate cells is a central contributor to the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis15, HYA may attenuate the fibrotic process by targeting ECM-related gene expression. Indeed, we have now also shown that HYA suppresses fibrosis-related gene expression by inhibiting TGF-β–Smad3 signaling in hepatic stellate cells. Hepatic fibrosis is the strongest predictor of liver-related events and long-term mortality in individuals with NAFLD/NASH13,35. By targeting liver fibrosis, HYA may therefore be of therapeutic benefit for NAFLD/NASH patients.
In this study, HYA treatment did not alter blood glucose levels whereas this treatment ameliorated insulin resistance at an early stage of the treatment. The possible mechanism for this result may involve glucagon and incretin hormones. It has been reported that glucagon secretion by the long-chain fatty acids such as palmitic acid and DHA is suppressed in mice lacking GPR40 and GPR12036, suggesting that GPR40 and GPR120 mediate glucagon secretion by long-chain fatty acid. Recently, HYA has been shown to activate GPR40 and GPR120 in intestinal L cells to increase the secretion of the incretin GLP-137. These findings suggest that HYA may affect glucagon secretion via activation of GPR40 and GPR120 in pancreatic ∝-cells. Thus, in addition to ameliorating insulin resistance, HYA may modulate blood glucose levels by affecting the secretion of glucagon and incretin hormones.
We found that HYA administration suppressed weight gain and ameliorated insulin resistance in mice fed a high-fat diet, consistent with the results of a recent study37. In our study, the weight of epididymal adipose tissue was slightly but significantly increased while that of subcutaneous adipose tissue was decreased by HYA administration, suggesting that the amelioration of insulin resistance by HYA may not simply be due to a reduction in fat mass. Such attenuation of insulin resistance in a manner independent of fat mass is reminiscent of metabolic healthy obesity, characterized by obesity in the absence of metabolic and cardiovascular complications38. Although the mechanisms responsible for the distinction between metabolically healthy and metabolically unhealthy obesity are not well understood, factors such as chronic inflammation and fibrosis in adipose tissue, changes in adipokine levels, and adipocyte size are thought to play a role39. Indeed, HYA administration was previously shown to reduce the circulating level of the proinflammatory adipokine MCP-1 and to attenuate chronic inflammation in adipose tissue of mice with diet-induced obesity37. Furthermore, the gut microbial LA metabolite KetoA was shown to have effects on adipose tissue including upregulation of adiponectin secretion40. Further study of the effects of the gut microbial LA metabolites on adipose tissue and their underlying mechanisms may therefore provide important insight into metabolically healthy or unhealthy obesity.
LA metabolites including HYA are produced by lactic acid bacteria represented by Lactobacillus in the gut28. Our present results suggest that pioglitazone increases the LA metabolite content of host tissue by increasing the fraction of Lactobacillus in the gut microbiota. However, there was some variability in the fraction of Lactobacillus for each mouse treated with pioglitazone. Although the mechanism for this variability among each mouse remained undetermined in this study, some factor that differs among each mouse might be required for the increase of Lactobacillus by pioglitazone. Adipose tissue is the major target organ of pioglitazone, given that PPARγ is predominantly expressed in adipocytes41. Pioglitazone ameliorates insulin resistance by various mechanisms. It thus increases the number of small adipocytes by promoting the differentiation of preadipocytes into mature adipocytes, reduces the number of hypertrophic adipocytes by inducing apoptosis, suppresses proinflammatory adipokine production, and increases the production of adiponectin42,43,44. PPARγ is also expressed in other cell types including colonic epithelial cells and immune cells45,46, although its expression level is relatively low in these cells compared with adipocytes. Consistent with this expression pattern, pioglitazone suppresses inflammation and improves intestinal barrier function in colitis47,48. It is thus possible that pioglitazone influences the gut microbiota through its effects on adipose tissue or, more directly, through those on intestinal epithelial cells and immune cells in the intestinal tract. Studies with tissue- or cell type–specific PPARγ knockout mice may shed light on which tissues or cells mediate the effect of pioglitazone on the gut microbiota.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that the gut microbial LA metabolite HYA plays a role in the mechanism by which pioglitazone ameliorates NAFLD/NASH. We have also revealed a previously unrecognized mechanism by which HYA suppresses fibrosis-related gene expression through inhibition of TGF-β–Smad3 signaling in hepatic stellate cells. Its ability to target liver fibrosis may render HYA of therapeutic benefit for individuals with NAFLD/NASH.
Data availability
Data, analytic methods, and study materials are all available on request to the corresponding author. Original RNA-seq data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database of NCBI (GSE242881).
References
Younossi, Z. et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: Trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109 (2018).
Rinella, M. E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review. JAMA 313, 2263–2273. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.5370 (2015).
Younossi, Z. M. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-a global public health perspective. J. Hepatol. 70, 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.033 (2019).
Polyzos, S. A., Kountouras, J. & Mantzoros, C. S. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: From pathophysiology to therapeutics. Metabolism 92, 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.014 (2019).
Younossi, Z. M. et al. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hepatol. 71, 793–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021 (2019).
Marchesini, G. et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology 37, 917–923. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50161 (2003).
Dulai, P. S. et al. Increased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology 65, 1557–1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29085 (2017).
Adams, L. A. et al. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology 129, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.014 (2005).
Tilg, H. & Moschen, A. R. Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: The multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology 52, 1836–1846. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24001 (2010).
Caligiuri, A., Gentilini, A. & Marra, F. Molecular pathogenesis of NASH. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091575 (2016).
Hosooka, T. et al. The PDK1-FoxO1 signaling in adipocytes controls systemic insulin sensitivity through the 5-lipoxygenase-leukotriene B(4) axis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11674–11684. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921015117 (2020).
Schuppan, D., Surabattula, R. & Wang, X. Y. Determinants of fibrosis progression and regression in NASH. J. Hepatol. 68, 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.012 (2018).
Hagstrom, H. et al. Fibrosis stage but not NASH predicts mortality and time to development of severe liver disease in biopsy-proven NAFLD. J. Hepatol. 67, 1265–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.07.027 (2017).
Mederacke, I. et al. Fate tracing reveals hepatic stellate cells as dominant contributors to liver fibrosis independent of its aetiology. Nat. Commun. 4, 2823. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3823 (2013).
Tsuchida, T. & Friedman, S. L. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14, 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.38 (2017).
Lehmann, J. M. et al. An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma). J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12953–12956. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.22.12953 (1995).
Devchand, P. R., Liu, T., Altman, R. B., FitzGerald, G. A. & Schadt, E. E. The pioglitazone trek via human PPAR gamma: From discovery to a medicine at the FDA and beyond. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 1093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01093 (2018).
Aronoff, S. et al. Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: A 6-month randomized placebo-controlled dose-response study. The pioglitazone 001 study group. Diabetes Care 23, 1605–1611. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.11.1605 (2000).
Dormandy, J. A. et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366, 1279–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67528-9 (2005).
DeFronzo, R. A., Inzucchi, S., Abdul-Ghani, M. & Nissen, S. E. Pioglitazone: The forgotten, cost-effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes. Diab. Vasc. Dis. Res. 16, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479164118825376 (2019).
Sanyal, A. J. et al. Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 1675–1685. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0907929 (2010).
Cusi, K. et al. Long-term pioglitazone treatment for patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 165, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1774 (2016).
Mantovani, A., Byrne, C. D., Scorletti, E., Mantzoros, C. S. & Targher, G. Efficacy and safety of anti-hyperglycaemic drugs in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with or without diabetes: An updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Metab. 46, 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2019.12.007 (2020).
Belfort, R. et al. A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 2297–2307. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa060326 (2006).
Aithal, G. P. et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in nondiabetic subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 135, 1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.047 (2008).
Bell, L. N. et al. Relationship between adipose tissue insulin resistance and liver histology in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A pioglitazone versus vitamin E versus placebo for the treatment of nondiabetic patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis trial follow-up study. Hepatology 56, 1311–1318. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.25805 (2012).
Kawaguchi-Suzuki, M., Bril, F., Kalavalapalli, S., Cusi, K. & Frye, R. F. Concentration-dependent response to pioglitazone in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 46, 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14111 (2017).
Kishino, S. et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acid saturation by gut lactic acid bacteria affecting host lipid composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17808–17813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312937110 (2013).
Colas, R. A., Shinohara, M., Dalli, J., Chiang, N. & Serhan, C. N. Identification and signature profiles for pro-resolving and inflammatory lipid mediators in human tissue. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 307, C39-54. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00024.2014 (2014).
Hosooka, T. et al. Dok1 mediates high-fat diet-induced adipocyte hypertrophy and obesity through modulation of PPAR-gamma phosphorylation. Nat. Med. 14, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1706 (2008).
Tsukada, S., Parsons, C. J. & Rippe, R. A. Mechanisms of liver fibrosis. Clin. Chim. Acta 364, 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2005.06.014 (2006).
Parola, M. & Pinzani, M. Liver fibrosis: Pathophysiology, pathogenetic targets and clinical issues. Mol. Aspects Med. 65, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2018.09.002 (2019).
Clapper, J. R. et al. Diet-induced mouse model of fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis reflecting clinical disease progression and methods of assessment. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 305, G483-495. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00079.2013 (2013).
Lefebvre, P. et al. Interspecies NASH disease activity whole-genome profiling identifies a fibrogenic role of PPARalpha-regulated dermatopontin. JCI Insight https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.92264 (2017).
Angulo, P. et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 149, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.043 (2015).
Suckow, A. T. et al. Alteration of the glucagon axis in GPR120 (FFAR4) knockout mice: A role for GPR120 in glucagon secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 15751–15763. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.568683 (2014).
Miyamoto, J. et al. Gut microbiota confers host resistance to obesity by metabolizing dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nat. Commun. 10, 4007. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11978-0 (2019).
Bluher, M. Metabolically healthy obesity. Endocr. Rev. 41, bnaa004. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnaa004 (2020).
Kloting, N. et al. Insulin-sensitive obesity. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 299, E506-515. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00586.2009 (2010).
Goto, T. et al. 10-oxo-12(Z)-octadecenoic acid, a linoleic acid metabolite produced by gut lactic acid bacteria, potently activates PPARgamma and stimulates adipogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 459, 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.154 (2015).
Spiegelman, B. M. PPAR-gamma: Adipogenic regulator and thiazolidinedione receptor. Diabetes 47, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.47.4.507 (1998).
Okuno, A. et al. Troglitazone increases the number of small adipocytes without the change of white adipose tissue mass in obese Zucker rats. J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1354–1361. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI1235 (1998).
Miyazaki, Y. et al. Effect of pioglitazone on circulating adipocytokine levels and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89, 4312–4319. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-0190 (2004).
Miyazawa, M. et al. Pioglitazone inhibits periprostatic white adipose tissue inflammation in obese mice. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila) 11, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0296 (2018).
Dubuquoy, L. et al. PPARgamma as a new therapeutic target in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut 55, 1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2006.093484 (2006).
Christofides, A., Konstantinidou, E., Jani, C. & Boussiotis, V. A. The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) in immune responses. Metabolism 114, 154338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154338 (2021).
Huang, Y. et al. Pioglitazone attenuates experimental colitis-associated hyperalgesia through improving the intestinal barrier dysfunction. Inflammation 43, 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-019-01138-3 (2020).
Schaefer, K. L. et al. Intestinal antiinflammatory effects of thiazolidenedione peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligands on T helper type 1 chemokine regulation include nontranscriptional control mechanisms. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 11, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mib.0000160770.94199.9b (2005).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported, in part, by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grants (21H03355 to TH). We thank C. Aoki (Kobe University) and K. Sato (University of Shizuoka) for assistance with mouse experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.H. designed research; N.K., Y.I., R.A., M.S., K.O., Y.H., M.I., C.T., J.K., S.K., J.O., W.O., and T.H. performed research; N.K., Y.I., R.A., M.S., K.O., Y.H., M.I., C.T., J.K., S.K., J.O., W.O., and T.H. analyzed data; Y.I., and T.H. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kasahara, N., Imi, Y., Amano, R. et al. A gut microbial metabolite of linoleic acid ameliorates liver fibrosis by inhibiting TGF-β signaling in hepatic stellate cells. Sci Rep 13, 18983 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46404-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46404-5
This article is cited by
-
Can essential fatty acids (EFAs) prevent and ameliorate post-COVID-19 long haul manifestations?
Lipids in Health and Disease (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.