Abstract
Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is the largest component of total energy expenditure and increasing it can be of great importance in reducing excess body fatness. Whole body vibration (WBV) can affect energy expenditure during single session of WBV, but the effects of repeated WBV on resting metabolic rate have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a series of WBV would increase resting metabolism in young men. Thirty-two healthy men aged of 21–23 were recruited and randomly assigned to two 16-member groups: a group participating in the WBV intervention and a group without the intervention. The intervention lasted 2 weeks and WBV was performed 5 times a week. Diet, physical activity, body composition and resting metabolic rate were analyzed in the participants. In WBV group significantly increased resting oxygen uptake (p = 0.049) and consequently RMR (p = 0.035) after the intervention. Similar changes were not observed in the control group. This indicates that applied type of vibration in this study can be an addition to obesity therapy, in which, WBV can, among other beneficial metabolic effects, increase RMR and thus total energy expenditure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is defined as the body’s energy expenditure at rest, when a person is awake, in a post-absorptive, thermoneutral state, and has not exercised for typically 12 h1,2. Resting metabolic rate is the largest component of total energy expenditure3 and increasing it can be of great importance, for example, in reducing excess body fatness. One of the ways to increase RMR is increasing physical activity, which, while leading to increased muscle mass (resistance training), also increases RMR4. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in obesity and obesity-related diseases, and this trend will continue to grow5. In order to treat obesity or prevent it, it seems necessary to look for methods that increase daily total energy expenditure. A promising direction of research may be the use of whole-body vibration (WBV) for this purpose. WBV has many positive metabolic effects, that can be used both in therapies for various diseases as well as in sports6,7. These include such WBV effects as improving blood circulation (blood flow)8, improving muscle strength and bone density9, and improving nervous system function10. For this reason, WBV is used in the treatment or prevention of many diseases, e.g. COVID-19 and quality of life11, osteoporosis12, chronic low back pain13, sarcopenia14 or ataxia15. WBV can also affect energy expenditure. Milanese et al.16 indicted that WBV can significantly increase the metabolic cost of exercise. RMR was also shown to increase during a single session of WBV in the supine position, but the observed effect did not persist after WBV ended17. The increased oxygen uptake during WBV was also confirmed18. To date, it has not been reported whether the observed metabolic effects of WBV may be permanent, i.e., induced by repeated exposure to vibration stimulation. We therefore hypothesized that systematically repeated WBV may induce an increase in resting metabolic rate, contributing to an increase in total energy expenditure. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a series of WBV would increase resting metabolism in young men.
Methods
Study design
The study was a parallel randomized trial. Thirty-two healthy men between the aged 21 to 23 years old were recruited and randomly assigned to two 16-member groups: a group participating in the WBV intervention (n = 16) and a group without the intervention (placebo: PL, n = 16). Participants drew numbers from 1 to 32: even numbers were placed in the WBV group, odd numbers in the PL group. The men were physically active, but did not engage in competitive sports. Only healthy men with normal BMI and similar physical activity were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were metabolic diseases, overweight or obesity, use of stimulants and pharmaceuticals, and anxiety disorders. Medical qualification for participation in the project was made by a physician.
Diet, physical activity, body composition and resting metabolic rate were analyzed in the participants. Body composition analysis and RMR measurement were performed twice, i.e. before and after completion of the WBV series (n = 10). The intervention lasted 2 weeks and WBV was performed 5 times a week (Monday–Friday) in the hours up to noon. All subjects completed the full series of 10 WBV, as well as all scheduled tests were performed in the study. Participation in the study was voluntary, and participants at any stage of the project were allowed to opt out of further participation. All study participants signed a consent form to participate in the project. The project was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Opole Medical School (no. KB/56/NOZ/2019).
Whole body vibration
Whole body vibration was performed in the vibration therapy laboratory, in which constant environmental conditions were maintained. The average temperature in the laboratory was 21.7 ± 0.46 °C and the humidity was 54.2 ± 0.70%. Cycloidal-oscillatory vibration was used in the study. WBV was applied by a physiotherapist/exercise physiologist, and during WBV the participant was supervised by the researcher. The intervention was performed in a prone position, as previously described17, with the use of a RAM Vitberg + Base Module (active medical device, class IIa) enhanced with a RAM Vitberg + Metabolism module (active medical device, class I) (Vitberg, Poland). Whole body vibration was applied using the Base Module, applying vibration to the trunk, upper limbs and thighs area, and additionally local vibration (Metabolism module) directed to the abdominal area. The physical stimulus was continuous vibration with variable values of frequency, amplitude and acceleration, which ranged, respectively: 25–52 Hz, 0.1–0.5 mm and 6.9–13.5 m/s2. The vibration stimulus was generated in three directional perpendicular (3D). A single WBV lasted 29 min. During the placebo treatment, the similar device was used, which did not generate vibration, but only a sound identical to the vibration. The procedures and body position were identical to the vibration intervention.
Body height, body mass and body composition
The body composition of the men was examined twice before and after the intervention. Body composition was measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) (Lunar Prodigy, GE, USA) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Body mass (BM), fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and percent body fat (%FAT) were determined. Body height was measured without shoes, in a standing position to the nearest 1 mm, with the head in the Frankfurt plane, using a stadiometer (Seca, Germany). In addition, body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each subject.
Diet and physical activity
Men completed 4-day food diaries, in which they recorded the weight or volume of each food consumed. The serving size was assessed subjectively by the participant on the basis of the Album of Product and Food Photography19. The caloric content of the diet and the proportion of carbohydrates, proteins and fats in the diet was then calculated by a qualified nutritionist, using the Diet 6.0 software (Food and Nutrition Institute, Warsaw, Poland).
Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ, short Polish version20), which the participants completed on the first day of the intervention. Before completing the questionnaire, they were instructed on its purpose and how to fill it out. The questionnaire was completed in the presence of the researcher, who instructed or answered any questions the respondents might have.
Resting metabolic rate
RMR was measured in fasting, always at the same time of day (morning), between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. Prior to the first RMR measurement, participants were instructed on how to prepare for the measurement, i.e. avoid exercise for 3 days before the scheduled measurement, be properly hydrated, and not use any stimulants before the study (nicotine, caffeine). Participants were also recommended not to change their diet or physical activity during the intervention. RMR was measured in the supine position in an air-conditioned laboratory, at a constant temperature of 21 °C, after a prior rest of about 15 min in the supine position. Resting metabolic rate, was measured by indirect calorimetry using a Cortex MetaLyzer 3R ergospirometer (Germany), using the breath by breath method. The ergospirometer was calibrated each time according to the manufacturer’s requirements (gas and volume calibration). Oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), respiratory quotient (RQ), RMR, and substrate utilization (carbohydrate [CHO], fat [FAT], protein [PRO]) and energy expenditure (EE) from each substrate were measured during the measurement. Resting metabolism was expressed absolutely (kcal/day) and relatively to body mass (kcal/kg/day) and to body surface area (RMR/BSA) (kg/m2/day). RMR and other indices measured by calorimetry were determined from a 5-min measurement period during which steady state was observed in oxygen uptake. The steady state was considered to be fluctuations in oxygen uptake within ± 10%. The averages from steady state were used to calculate REE using the Weir21 formula without using urinary urea nitrogen. All calculations were performed using dedicated metabolic rate measurement software provided by ergospirometer manufacturer (Cortex, Germany).
Statistical analysis
Sample size was estimated a priori using G*Power 3.1.9.7 (Dusseldorf, Germany). The following options were selected in the software: test family = f tests; statistical test = ANOVA repeated measures, within-between interaction; type of power analysis = compute required sample size—given α, power, and effect size. Input parameters into the software were as follows: effect size f = 0.4; α error probability = 0.01; power = 0.95; number of groups and measurements = 2; correlation among measures = 0.5; nonsphericity correction = 1.0. The required sample size was 16 subjects per group (total sample size = 32). Data distribution was checked using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Homogeneity of variance within the groups was tested via Levene’s test Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures or one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data obtained. In case of significant changes (p < 0.05) in the analysis of variance, post-hoc analysis was performed using the Tukey test. Additionaly, in post hoc analysis (if significant), the effect size (Cohen’s d) between baseline and WBV (placebo) treatment was calculated and interpreted as small (0.20), medium (0.50), or large (0.80)22. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation. The STATISTICA 13 package (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) was used for calculations.
Ethics declaration
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Bioethics Committee of Opole Medical School in Poland (no. KB/56/NOZ/2019). All participants were informed about the study protocol, voluntarily took part in the experiment and signed informed consent.
Results
No adverse effects were reported during the intervention.
Physical activity and diet
The groups did not differ significantly (f = 0.46, p = 0.50) in physical activity level, which averaged 4156 ± 942 MET-minutes/week in the WBV group and 3902 ± 1163 MET-minutes/week in the PL group. There were also no significant differences in the caloric content of the participants’ diet (f = 0.49, p = 0.48). The average dietary energy supply in the WBV group was 3036.5 ± 788.3 kcal/day and in the PL group 2829.6 ± 870.1 kcal/day. Both groups had similar proportions of carbohydrates (378.0 ± 126.8 g (WBV) vs. 328.7 ± 95.4 g (PL); f = 1.54, p = 0.22), proteins (respectively: 133.4 ± 31.4 g vs. 128.6 ± 44.4; f = 0.12, p = 0.72) and fats (respectively: 112.8 ± 30.2 g vs. 112.2 ± 54.4 g; f = 0.001, p = 0.97) in the diet.
Somatic build
There were no significant differences in body height, body mass or body composition between WBV and PL group. The parameters did not change significantly during the intervention either (Table 1).
Resting metabolic rate
There were no significant intergroup differences in the level of the parameters studied (Table 2). However, significant changes were observed between measurements. In the WBV group significantly increased resting oxygen uptake (p = 0.049) and consequently RMR (p = 0.035) after intervention. The significant increase in RMR in the WBV group was due to increased resting carbohydrate utilization i.e. 330.88 ± 98.1 g/day (baseline) vs. 407.13 ± 111.9 g/day (post intervention) (p = 0.024). Similar changes were not observed in the PL group (Table 2).
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the effects of a series of WBV on resting metabolism. A previous study17, which only examined the effect of a single WBV on RMR, showed that RMR was increased during WBV and the effect disappeared after WBV session. This study showed that there was a significant increase in RMR in young men after just two weeks of WBV intervention.
Resting metabolism is affected by age, physical activity, and lean body mass3. Long-term effects of physical activity result in increases in RMR due to increases in lean muscle mass3 and lean body mass correlates highly with RMR23. Many other factors: anxiety, diurnal variation, the thermic effect of food, elevated post-exercise oxygen consumption, stimulants, and pharmaceuticals can also affect the resting metabolic rate24. In our study, both age, physical activity, and lean body mass were similar in both groups, so it is likely that they also had similar effects on metabolism in both groups. The participants in both groups also consumed similar amounts of carbohydrates, proteins and fats. The study’s inclusion criteria also allowed for ineligibility of stimulant users and pharmaceuticals. The participants enrolled the study were rested (after an overnight rest) and avoided physical exertion for three days prior to RMR measurement. This allowed us to control most of the factors that could affect RMR. Haugen et al.24, also showed that repeated morning and evening measurements of RMR are stable and highly correlated and day-to-day measurements of RMR are not significantly different. This indicates that RMR measurement is highly repeatable.
In this study, by applying WBV in the prone position, it was possible, on the one hand, to deactivate postural muscles and, on the other hand, to apply additional local vibration, to stimulate directly the abdominal cavity. Local vibration, could affect the function of the gastrointestinal tract and thus, indirectly, the thermic effect of food (TEF) i.e. the energy cost of chewing, swallowing, digesting, absorbing and storing food. TEF is a significant part of energy expenditure and is influenced by, among other things, the caloric content of the diet, eating habits, physical activity and sympathetic nervous system activity25. It has been shown that sympathetic stimulation in the upper gastrointestinal tract may increase metabolic rate up to 15.6%26. Previous paper has shown that WBV can be an effective method in improving gastrointestinal function. Two weeks of low-intensity WBV was an effective therapy for reducing symptom severity in patients with chronic functional constipation27. For this reason, vibrating capsules have begun to be used in patients with constipation. Vibrating capsule may improve constipation by augmenting the physiological effects of waking and meals on bowel movements and circadian rhythm28. Vibrating capsule can promote defecation, as well as ameliorating symptoms and improving the quality of life in patients with functional constipation with sustained efficacy29. The applied local abdominal vibration was a specific abdominal vibro-massage. Abdominal massage can stimulate the parasympathetic activity and thus the gastrointestinal response30. It increases peristaltic movements and accelerates the passage of food through the gastrointestinal tract31,32. Our participants did not declare constipation or have a medical interview in this direction, nor did they report functional changes in the gastrointestinal tract after intervention, this applied local vibration, targeting the abdominal cavity, could significantly affect gastrointestinal tract function and improve its function, thus affecting TEF.
The study used WBV in combination with local vibration. Although local vibration may have affected TEF, the observed metabolic effect may also be due to the effects of WBV or the combination of local vibration and WBV. Increased metabolism during WBV may also be the result of changes in circulation because the peripheral vascular system is sensitive to vibration stimulation33. In a previous study8, an increase in mean blood flow was observed during WBV. Whole-body vibration also increases muscle activity by inducing a tonic vibration reflex in the muscles34. RMR is mostly dependent on the amount of metabolically active tissue in an individual (mainly muscle mass)35. Thus, both increasing muscle activity and improving tissue blood flow can also affect metabolic rate.
Conclusion
The results of our study indicate that after just 2 weeks of using WBV in combination with local vibration applied to the abdominal area, resting metabolism increased significantly. This indicates that this type of vibration can be an addition to obesity therapy, in which WBV can, among other beneficial metabolic effects, increase RMR and thus total energy expenditure.
Strength and limitation of the study
The strength of this study is the rigorous methodology and research methods used. Our intervention lasted 2 weeks, and after that time we observed an increase in RMR in men. Perhaps the results would have been different after a different intervention period. The reported effect applies only to vibration with the described characteristics and body position. Only young healthy men without overweight or obesity participated in this study. Further studies should also be conducted in women and those with obesity or other metabolic disorders to confirm the reported effect.
Data availability
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Ainsworth, B. E. et al. Compendium of physical activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32, S498–S516 (2000).
Bray, G. A., Bouchard, C. & James, W. P. T. Handbook of Obesity 446–448 (Marcel Dekker Inc, 2004).
Speakman, J. R. & Selman, C. Physical activity and resting metabolic rate. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 62, 621–634 (2003).
MacKenzie-Shalders, K., Kelly, J. T., So, D., Coffey, V. G. & Byrne, N. M. The effect of exercise interventions on resting metabolic rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Sports Sci. 38, 1635–1649 (2020).
Janssen, F., Bardoutsos, A. & Vidra, N. Obesity prevalence in the long-term future in 18 European countries and in the USA. Obes. Facts 13, 514–527 (2020).
van Heuvelen, M. J. et al. Reporting guidelines for whole-body vibration studies in humans, animals and cell cultures: A Consensus Statement from an International Group of Experts. Biology 10, 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10100965 (2021).
Wuestefeld, A. et al. Towards reporting guidelines of research using whole-body vibration as training or treatment regimen in human subjects—A Delphi consensus study. PLoS ONE 15, e0235905. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235905 (2020).
Button, C., Anderson, N., Bradford, C., Cotter, J. D. & Ainslie, P. N. The effect of multidirectional mechanical vibration on peripheral circulation of humans. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 27, 211–216 (2007).
Madou, K. H. & Cronin, J. B. The effects of whole body vibration on physical and physiological capability in special populations. Hong Kong Physiother. J. 26, 24–38 (2008).
Games, K. E. & Sefton, J. M. Whole-body vibration influences lower extremity circulatory and neurological function. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 23, 516–523 (2013).
Sañudo, B. et al. Potential application of whole body vibration exercise for improving the clinical conditions of COVID-19 infected individuals: A narrative review from the world association of vibration exercise experts (WAVex) panel. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(10), 3650. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103650 (2020).
Jepsen, D. B. et al. The combined effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) and whole-body vibration exercise in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PaVOS study): A randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos. Int. 30, 1827–1836 (2019).
Wang, X. Q. et al. Effects of whole-body vibration exercise for non-specific chronic low back pain: An assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 33, 1445–1457 (2019).
Wu, S. et al. Effects of vibration therapy on muscle mass, muscle strength and physical function in older adults with sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Act. 17, 1–12 (2020).
Özvar, G. B., Ayvat, E. & Kılınç, M. Immediate effects of local vibration and whole-body vibration on postural control in patients with ataxia: An assessor-blind, cross-over randomized trial. The Cerebellum 20, 83–91 (2021).
Milanese, C. et al. Metabolic effect of bodyweight whole-body vibration in a 20-min exercise session: A crossover study using verified vibration stimulus. PLoS ONE 13, e0192046. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192046 (2018).
Maciejczyk, M. et al. Acute effects of whole-body vibration on resting metabolic rate and substrate utilisation in healthy women. Biology 11(5), 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050655 (2022).
Rittweger, J. Metabolic responses to whole-body vibration exercise. In Manual of Vibration Exercise and Vibration Therapy (ed. Rittweger, J.) 143–153 (Springer, 2020).
Szponar, L., Wolnicka, K. & Rychli, E. Album of Photographs of Food Products and Dishes (National Food and Nutrition Institute, 2000).
Biernat, E., Stupnicki, R. & Gajewski, A. K. International physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ)—Polish version. Wych. Fiz. Sport 51, 47–54 (2007).
Weir, J. B. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J. Physiol. 109, 1–9 (1949).
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Routledge Academic, 1988).
Arciero, P. J., Goran, M. I. & Poehlman, E. T. Resting metabolic rate is lower in women than in men. J. Appl. Physiol. 75, 2514–2520 (1993).
Haugen, H. A., Melanson, E. L., Tran, Z. V., Kearney, J. T. & Hill, J. O. Variability of measured resting metabolic rate. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 78, 1141–1144 (2003).
Calcagno, M. et al. The thermic effect of food: A review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 38, 547–551 (2019).
Zheng, J., DiLorenzo, D. J., McLaughlin, L., Roberts, A. T. & Greenway, F. L. Stimulation of sympathetic innervation in the upper gastrointestinal tract as a treatment for obesity. Med. Hypotheses 72, 706–710 (2009).
Wu, T. J. et al. Whole-body vibration for functional constipation: A single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 14, e779–e785 (2012).
Rao, S. S., Lembo, A., Chey, W. D., Friedenberg, K. & Quigley, E. M. Effects of the vibrating capsule on colonic circadian rhythm and bowel symptoms in chronic idiopathic constipation. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 32, e13890. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13890 (2020).
Zhu, J. H. et al. Efficacy and safety of vibrating capsule for functional constipation (VICONS): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. EClinicalMedicine 47, 101407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101407 (2022).
Moyer, C. A., Rounds, J. & Hannum, J. W. A meta-analysis of massage therapy research. Psychol. Bull. 130, 3–18 (2004).
Uysal, N., Eser, I. & Akpinar, H. The effect of abdominal massage on gastric residual volume: A randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterol. Nurs. 35, 117–123 (2012).
Dehghan, M., Malakoutikhah, A., Heidari, F. G. & Zakeri, M. A. The effect of abdominal massage on gastrointestinal functions: A systematic review. Complement. Ther. Med. 54, 102553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102553 (2020).
Robbins, D., Yoganathan, P. & Goss-Sampson, M. The influence of whole body vibration on the central and peripheral cardiovascular system. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 34, 364–369 (2014).
Cardinale, M. & Pope, M. H. The effects of whole body vibration on humans: Dangerous or advantageous? Acta Physiol. Hung. 90, 195–206 (2003).
McMurray, R. G. et al. Examining variations of resting metabolic rate of adults: A public health perspective. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 46, 1352–1358 (2014).
Funding
This research was funded by the National Center for Research and Development (Poland), Project No.: POIR.01.01.01-OO-1208/17-00. The APC was funded by the University of Physical Education, Kraków, Poland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M.; methodology, M.M., M.B.; validation, T.P., A.P., and P.B.; formal analysis, M.M.; investigation, M.B., M.W., Z.S.; data curation, M.M., M.W., and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.B., P.B., T.P., and A.P.; project administration, P.B., and M.M.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Maciejczyk, M., Bawelski, M., Wiecek, M. et al. Resting metabolic rate is increased after a series of whole body vibration in young men. Sci Rep 13, 17165 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44543-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44543-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.