Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41878-9, published online 05 September 2023


The Data availability section in the original version of this Article was incorrect.


“The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”


now reads:


“We deposited the variant into the LOVD locus specific database, which was already revised and accepted by the curator. The reference number: https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/0000932922


The original Article has been corrected.