Abstract
Situated models suggest that social concepts are grounded in interpersonal experience. However, few studies have tested this notion experimentally, and none has targeted individuals with reduced social interaction. Here, we assessed comprehension of text-level social and non-social concepts in persons with and without autistic-like traits. Participants read a social and a non-social text and answered questionnaires targeting social and non-social concepts, respectively. We compared behavioral outcomes, gauged their contribution to subject-level classification, and examined their association with validated measures of autism. Persons with autistic-like traits showed selective deficits in grasping text-level social concepts, even adjusting for intelligence, memory, and vocabulary. Also, social concept comprehension was the only variable that significantly classified between groups. Finally, social concept outcomes correlated negatively with measures of autism, including social interaction. Our results suggest that reduced interpersonal experience selectively compromises text-level social concept processing, offering empirical constraints for situated models of social semantics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Social concepts (complex categories evoking interpersonal behaviors, traits, or events) are a hot topic in semantic memory research. Situated accounts underscore their grounding in interpersonal experience, which would provide contextual anchorage for their understanding and processing. Yet, few studies have tackled this notion experimentally and none has tested the key hypothesis that social concept processing should be distinctly undermined in persons with reduced social interaction. To bridge this gap with naturalistic materials, we examined comprehension of a social text (ST, rich in social concepts) and a non-social text (nST, devoid of social concepts) in individuals with and without autistic-like traits, accounting for relevant factors and examining correlations with measures of autism, including social interaction.
Social concepts capture salient aspects of interpersonal scenarios, such as person-specific knowledge, other-directed behaviors, and pro/anti-social traits1,2,3,4. Linguistically, these are manifested by positively or negatively valenced words that evoke socialness, including verbs (e.g., help, resent), nouns (e.g., kindness, envy), and adjectives (e.g., friendly, jealous)1. Despite overlaps with other abstract categories5, socially-laden words comprise a distinguishable semantic cluster within the lexicon6 and distinctly engage brain regions subserving theory of mind and other socio-cognitive domains2, 4, 7,8,9. Moreover, social content represents a latent factor accounting for inter-individual neural commonalities during activation of abstract concept features10. Accordingly, social concepts arguably constitute a distinct category amidst other forms of semantic knowledge1, 2, 4.
Given their scope, social concepts typically involve perceptually heterogeneous exemplars, highly indeterminate referents, and diverse thematic associations5. Thus, unlike other categories rooted in consistent sensorimotor experiences (e.g., body-action concepts), they are likely grounded through continued interpersonal exchanges and socially shared linguistic labels5, 11. While sustained contact with others may be important to establish diverse abstract categories5, 12, this requisite proves particularly critical for social concepts. Indeed, as detailed in situated accounts of cognition, concepts are grasped through first-hand experience with the scenarios in which they occur and to which they allude13,14,15, meaning that social concepts crucially hinge on actual social immersion. Their understanding, indeed, would imply reactivating multiple memory traces of such lived events13, 16, as implied in neuroimaging studies showing that social cognition regions are activated during social word processing in semantic decision7, verb-noun association17, and sentence comprehension18,19,20 tasks. Accordingly, just like our grasping of social concepts shapes interpersonal experiences1, so, too, these experiences would shape our grasping of social concepts.
Previous studies show that socio-cognitive domains, such as moral judgment, emotional dysregulation, and theory of mind, are distinctly affected in antisocial21 and lonely22 individuals, including victims of bullying23. More particularly, patients with altered socio-interactive conduct exhibit selective social concept deficits, which correlate with anatomo-functional alterations along social cognition brain networks9, 24. Accordingly, social concept processing skills might be related to the richness of social experience. However, the situated account of social concepts has not yet been tested against a critical model: persons with and without autistic-like traits—defined by the gold-standard Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)25 as high AQ and low AQ, respectively.
In addition to introversion, depression, and low conscientiousness26, high AQ individuals are typified by limited interpersonal exchanges, poor reciprocal social interaction and dialogue, and a preference for isolated activities26, 27. Reduced interpersonal communication is, in fact, one of their predominant characteristics26, 27. These features are almost identical in people with an actual diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD)25. Individuals with high AQ score lower than those with low AQ on social cognition measures28,29,30, and their performance correlates with scores in the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 (ADOS-2)—the gold-standard instrument in ASD research, including subscales of reciprocal social interaction and interpersonal communication skills31. Interestingly, some such impairments seem uninfluenced by broader cognitive skills, including general intelligence, working memory, and vocabulary32, 33. Therefore, high AQ scorers offer a critical model to test whether social concept processing is related to interpersonal experience, and whether this link is mediated by more general cognitive traits.
Importantly, this issue can be studied with ecological validity through naturalistic texts. Most social concept research17, 34, 35 has employed single-item stimuli, overlooking the contextual anchorage needed to capture words’ precise social implications. For instance, while the verb promise may or may not entail a social commitment when presented in isolation, it acquires rich interpersonal significance in the sentence She promised she would always be there for him. Indeed, textual context prompts specific emotional, empathic, and mentalistic operations that ground these concepts in actual social experience2, 9, 24. Though blind to the individual role of such socio-cognitive variables, text-level paradigms thus enable more naturalistic assessments of social concepts, addressing calls for ecologically valid insights on the construct9, 24 and on language processing at large36,37,38,39,40,41,42.
Against this background, we employed a naturalistic text paradigm assessing social and non-social concept comprehension via multiple-choice questionnaires24. Importantly, this task has revealed selective social concept deficits in other populations with socio-interactive atypicalities24. We established (sub-clinical) autistic traits via the AQ. Also, to better capture the social profiles of high AQ participants, we administered module 4 of the ADOS-2 scale, computing its total score and outcomes in relevant subscales. Based on previous findings, we predicted that high AQ participants would be outperformed by low AQ persons on the ST (but not on the nST) questionnaire, irrespective of intelligence, working memory, and vocabulary skills. Second, we anticipated that ST outcomes would robustly classify between low AQ and high AQ participants at the individual level. Finally, we predicted that the greater the social detachment of high AQ participants, the lower their capacity to grasp ST information. With this approach, we aim to shed new light on the role of situated interactive experiences in grounding social concepts.
Methods
Participants
Participants were drawn from a large pre-screening group of 878 students. All of them voluntarily completed an online version of the AQ, yielding a mean total AQ score of 18.24 (SD = 5.5). These individuals were contacted through various channels, including the Canarian Association for Autism Spectrum Disorder, online platforms from faculties at Universidad de La Laguna (Spain), and a student-support program from the same university. Recruitment efforts also included oral invitations to students during lectures. Participants were considered to have a high AQ if their scores were greater than 30 (2 SDs above the overall group’s mean), and to have low AQ group if their scores fell between the mean and one SD below it (keeping within the range of 13–18 to avoid extremely low values, as in previous research)28.
The final sample comprised 36 native Spanish speakers, 18 with high AQ and 18 with low AQ (Fig. 1A). This sample size reaches a power of 0.88 (Supplementary material, Power estimation section). All participants were right-handed, had normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing, and presented no history of psychiatric disorders, neurological diseases, primary language deficits or substance abuse. Both groups were matched for sex, age, and years of education.
All participants were assessed for non-verbal intelligence, via the Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test [RPMT43]; mnesic skills, through a verbal working memory task [WMT44]; and linguistic skills, via the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III [PPVT-III45]—for a description of these tests, see Supplementary material, Cognitive assessment. All assessments were conducted in person by one of the researchers (JLP) in a quiet room with dim lighting. Participants in the high AQ group were also evaluated via module 4 of the ADOS-2 scale. In all cases, participants first completed a demographic questionnaire, followed by the RPMT, then by the WMT, then by the PPVT-III, and finally by the text-level task. In the case of high AQ individuals, these tasks were preceded by module 4 of the ADOS-2. The samples’ demographic, autistic, and cognitive profiles are detailed in Table 1.
All participants read and signed an informed consent form before beginning the study. The protocol was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Research Committees of Universidad de La Laguna.
Discourse-level task
Naturalistic texts
All participants listened to two stories used in previous social concept research: an ST (highlighting interpersonal events) and an nST (narrating the activities of a single individual)24. The social/non-social contrast was manifested in the verbs and circumstantial adjuncts of each text. Most of these units in the ST referred to social interactions between two people (e.g., greeting someone kindly), whereas all verbs and circumstances in the nST lacked socio-interactive associations, as they described the actions of an unaccompanied character on various objects (e.g., preparing breakfast).
Both stories were composed through a systematic text-construction protocol36,37,38,39, 46, 47. First, 22 grammatical patterns were created and pseudo-randomly distributed for each text, each filled with strategic lexical items. For example, the pattern “Compound sentence: clause 1 [complement + empty subject + verb + complement] + conjunction + clause 2 [empty subject + verb + complement]” was filled as Immediately, he went over to Juan and earnestly asked for a favor for the ST, and as Afterwards, he would read a book and listen to classical music on the balcony for the nST. Both texts were matched for (1) character count; (2) overall and specific word-type counts; (3) mean content-word frequency, familiarity, syllabic length, number of letters, propositional density, and imageability; (4) sentence and sentence-type counts; and (5) a readability measure (Szigriszt-Pazos Index) and its associated readability rating (Inflesz scale). Moreover, the texts were matched for grammatical correctness, coherence, and comprehensibility (as judged by 20 raters on a scale from 1 through 5), as well as emotional content (positive, negative or neutral) and arousal level (intensity of the chosen emotion, from 1 through 5, as established by 14 raters). All sentences communicated mostly literal meanings and contained no jargon. See statistical details in Table 2. For full transcriptions and approximate English translations, see Supplementary material , Naturalistic texts. Stories were audio-recorded by a male native speaker of Canarian Spanish (the participants’ regional dialect), at a smooth pace, in .mp3 stereo format. Each narration lasted roughly 100 s.
Comprehension questionnaires
Following each narration, participants completed a 16-item multiple-choice questionnaire featuring wh-questions47. Half the questions pointed to verb-related information, denoting the characters’ activities, and were mostly structured as What did [a character] do when…? The other half aimed at circumstances, realized by adverbial or prepositional phrases pointing to locative, causal, temporal, or social information signalled by Where, Why, When or How. In the ST questionnaire, all verb-related and circumstantial questions targeted social interactions (e.g., How did Juan react to Albert’s payment offer? He rejected it; How did Albert insist? Kindly). Conversely, in the nST questionnaire, all verb-related and circumstantial questions targeted non-social information (What did Luis do with the TV? He turned it on; Where was the clock? On the nightstand).
Questions were presented following the stories’ sequence of events, alternating between verb-related and circumstantial items. Successive questions were independent from each other. Each question featured five options: a correct response, three subtly incorrect options, and an ‘I don't remember’ option. Sequencing of options was randomized across questions, except for ‘I don’t remember’, which always appeared last. Correct responses were given one point; the others were given zero points. Each questionnaire had a maximum score of 16 points expressed as a percentage of correct answers for analysis.
Procedure
Participants were instructed to close their eyes and listen carefully to the recorded texts through professional, high-definition headphones (Fig. 1B). At the beginning of the task, a different narrative was administered for familiarization purposes. It consisted in one text with the same length and structure as the ones in the experiment, followed by three sample questions on the computer screen. After this practice, participants listened to the ST and nST. Each text was played only once. Texts were counterbalanced across participants. Following each narration, its corresponding questionnaire was presented with its options. Participants were instructed to choose the correct answer as quickly as possible, using predefined keyboard keys. Selected options were automatically saved. The experiment ran in e-prime.
Behavioral data analysis
First, we carried out a cross-textual analysis via a 2 × 2 mixed-effects ANOVA, with a between-subject factor ‘group’ (high AQ and low AQ) and a within-subject factor ‘text’. Then, given the mismatch in motor content (see Table 2), and as in previous works employing this discourse-level paradigm, we implemented a within-text analysis, comparing the performance between groups for each text separately9, 38, 46 via one-way ANOVAs, with ‘group’ as the categorical factor. We thus favored comparability with previous studies while circumventing confounds (fine-grained aspects not controlled between texts) and unduly stringent analyses. Also, to determine whether potential text retrieval outcomes were related to non-verbal intelligence, working memory, or vocabulary skills, results from the naturalistic text task were reanalyzed via ANCOVAs, covarying for the total scores of the RPMT, WMT, and PPVT-III, as in previous works37. Alpha levels were set at p < 0.05. Effect sizes were calculated via partial eta squared (η2) for ANOVAs and Cohen’s d for pairwise comparisons53.
To gauge the importance of social concept processing for discriminating individuals in each group, we performed linear discriminant analyses (LDAs). This method identifies the linear combination of a set of covariates that maximizes between-group differences while minimizing within-group differences54. We ran two models, one for the ST with four predictors (ST, RPMT, WMT, and PPVT-III scores) and one for the nST with four predictors (nST, RPMT, WMT, and PPVT-III scores). Performance estimates were corrected in a data-driven approach via leave-one-out cross-validation55. To determine which covariates best differentiated between high AQ and low AQ individuals in each LDA, we implemented a stepwise forward variable selection using the Wilk’s Lambda criterion. LDA classification results are reported through confusion matrices and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. All analyses were performed on R 4.1.156.
Finally, to examine whether social concept outcomes were associated with autistic traits in the high AQ group, we performed Pearson’s partial correlations between performance on each text and four measures from the ADOS-2: the instrument’s total score as well as the ‘reciprocal social interaction’, ‘communication’, and ‘stereotyped behaviours and restricted interests’ subscales. These analyses were covaried by WMT scores, given that working memory was impaired in the high AQ group and has been shown to correlate with social cognition outcomes57, 58.
Results
Cross-textual analysis
The cross-textual analysis revealed a significant main effect of text (F(1,34) = 15.71, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.11), with significantly higher scores for the ST (M = 66, SD = 17) than for the nST (M = 77.4, SD = 17). This effect remained significant even after controlling for RPMT (F(1,33) = 14.71, p < 0.001), WMT (F(1,33) = 16.63, p < 0.001), and PPVT-III (F(1,33) = 14.63, p < 0.001) results. Additionally, the main effect of group approached significance (F(1,34) = 3.59, p = 0.07, η2 = 0.07), with higher scores for the low AQ group (M = 76.2, SD = 15.6) compared to the high AQ group (M = 67.2, SD = 19.2). This trend remained after accounting for RPMT (F(1,33) = 3.57, p = 0.07), WMT (F(1,33) = 3.53, p = 0.07), and PPVT-III (F(1,33) = 3.72, p = 0.06) results. Finally, the interaction between text and group was not significant (F(1,34) = 0.92, p = 0.34, η2 = 0.007).
Within-text analyses
ST scores were significantly lower for the high AQ group (M = 71, SD = 20) than for the low AQ group (M = 83, SD = 11) (F(1,34) = 4.73, p = 0.037, d = 0.74) (Fig. 1C, left inset). This effect remained significant after covarying for RPMT (F(1,33) = 4.60, p = 0.039), WMT (F(1,33) = 4.86, p = 0.035), and PPVT-III (F(1,33) = 4.67, p = 0.038) results. Conversely, nST scores did not differ significantly between groups (high AQ: M = 63, SD = 18; low AQ: M = 69, SD = 16; F(1,34) = 1.19, p = 0.282, d = 0.35) (Fig. 1C, right inset). This result remained non-significant after covariation with RPMT (F(1,33) = 1.16, p = 0.288), WMT (F(1,33) = 1.24, p = 0.273), and PPVT-III (F(1,33) = 1.16, p = 0.289) outcomes.
Subject-level discrimination
The first LDA model showed that ST score was the only variable classifying between persons in the high AQ and the low AQ groups (Wilkis’s λ = 0.87, F(1,34) = 4.73, p = 0.036). This model successfully classified 72% of participants (72% of high AQ and 72% of low AQ individuals, 95% CI 0.54–0.85, p = 0.005, Cohen’s Kappa = 0.44) (Fig. 1D, left inset), with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 64.20 (95% CI 0.45–0.84). Conversely, the second LDA model, including nST scores, yielded non-significant results. The variable that most contributed to group classification was WMT score (Wilkis's λ = 0.89, F(1,34) = 4.21, p = 0.047). This model with nST scores only classified 58% of the participants (67% of high AQ and 50% of low AQ individuals, 95% CI 0.40–0.75, p = 0.203, Cohen’s Kappa = 0.16) (Fig. 1E, left inset), with an AUC of 53.09 (95% CI 0.34–0.74).
Correlations between discourse-level scores and autism measures
Correlations between discourse-level scores and ADOS-2 outcomes in the high AQ group also differed between texts. Upon covarying for WMT results, ST outcomes were negatively correlated with the instrument’s total score (r = − 0.51, p = 0.039) as well as the ‘reciprocal social interaction’ subscore (r = − 0.55, p = 0.026), with the ‘stereotyped behaviors and restricted interests’ subscore (r = − 0.55, p = 0.02), but not with the ‘communication’ subscore (r = − 0.38, p = 0.13) (Fig. 1F). Contrariwise, nST scores were not significantly associated with any such measures (total score r = − 0.37, p = 0.154; ‘reciprocal social interaction’: r = − 0.40, p = 0.122; ‘stereotyped behaviors and restricted interests’: r = − 0.33, p = 0.21; ‘communication’: r = − 0.27, p = 0.30) (Fig. 1G).
Discussion
This is the first study to examine (text-level) social concept comprehension in persons with and without autistic-like traits. Unlike nST scores, ST scores were significantly lower in the high than in the low AQ group, and this result was uninfluenced by individual variability in non-verbal intelligence, working memory, and vocabulary skills. Moreover, performance on the ST (but not on the nST) robustly classified subjects as high AQ or low AQ, and it was negatively associated with total ADOS-2 score and relevant subscales. Below we discuss our findings, addressing their theoretical implications.
Our key finding is that high AQ participants were outperformed by their low AQ counterparts on the ST but not on the nST. This aligns with research revealing impaired processing of social semantic content in persons with ASD59 and selective ST deficits in neurodegenerative patients with primary socio-affective impairments24. Suggestively, social (relative to emotional) concepts distinctly recruit fronto-temporo-parietal regions (e.g., prefrontal cortex, middle temporal gyrus, temporo-parietal junction)60 that present anatomo-functional alterations in ASD61,62,63,64, especially during social cognition tasks65, 66. Our results support and extend these findings, suggesting that social concept skills may be partly driven by situated interpersonal experience.
The ST difficulties of the high AQ group emerged independently of non-verbal intelligence, working memory, and vocabulary level. Previous studies on ASD and high AQ samples suggest that these domains may influence performance on other socio-cognitive domains67, such as theory of mind68, emotion recognition69, and socializing70. However, no such influences have been detected in other studies32, 33, suggesting that only certain socio-cognitive domains, or certain socio-cognitive tasks, are influenced by such general skills. In this sense, our results indicate that selective text-level social concept deficits in high AQ persons may not be secondary to broader cognitive dysfunctions, but rather represent a sui generis, category-specific semantic deficit. This further suggests that social concept processing may be grounded in interpersonal experience, beyond the latter’s effects on other cognitive functions.
Interestingly, the cross-textual analysis revealed significantly lower scores on the nST than on the ST. This discrepancy could be influenced by the nST’s greater motoric content—namely, the level of bodily movement implied by verbs51. Indeed, stimuli with high motor content prove more cognitively challenging than those with low motor content71, 72. The interaction between group and text, however, was not significant. Such an effect, we surmise, may have been abolished by the greater demands of the nST (conceivably, a less demanding control text could have elicited better outcomes in both groups, increasing the performance difference relative to the ST). While this remains speculative, such a null result further emphasizes the importance of employing within-text analyses to elucidate condition-specific differences between groups9, 38, 46.
In this sense, LDA results showed that ST (unlike nST) scores discriminated individual high AQ participants from low AQ participants. ST scores emerged as the best classifier between groups, with an accuracy of 72% (and perfect balance between both groups). This variable even outweighed WMT scores—which is notable given the systematicity of working memory deficits in persons with high AQ73 and ASD74. Thus, group-level results were not dependent on a few low-scoring participants. Indeed, social semantic outcomes in natural speech also constitute the most accurate variable for classifying persons with and without ASD75. In people with reduced social experience, then, ST comprehension difficulties seem inter-individually consistent and more discriminatory than other cognitive deficits.
Moreover, ST outcomes in the high AQ group were negatively correlated with ADOS-2 scores (adjusted for WMT scores). This reinforces the claim that social concept processing hinges on interpersonal experience. Indeed, in ASD research, ADOS-2 scores have been shown to correlate with deficits on other social cognition tasks31, 76, 77. Notably, subscale analyses revealed that ST outcomes were correlated with the ‘reciprocal social interaction’ (ability to engage in exchanges with one or more people) and the ‘stereotyped behaviors and restricted interests’ subscores (conducts repeatedly in an exact way, often involving individual actions). Scores on these subscales have been associated with domains like emotion recognition78, 79 and theory of mind80, 81, attesting to their relevance to socio-cognitive skills at large. Importantly, no correlations with ADOS-2 scores emerged for the nST, even though it proved more demanding than the ST. This further suggests that socio-cognitive variability across high AQ participants was not related to difficulties with linguistic materials at large, but rather confined to texts conveying social information. Thus, though strictly correlational, our results lend additional support to our hypothesis, as they indicate that the poorer the engagement with others, the lower the capacity to grasp social information.
Taken together, our findings indicate that the ability to process social concepts is related to situated gregarious experience. This evidence supports the view that interpersonal exchanges are distinctly needed to acquire and use diverse abstract concepts, including social ones5. From a situated cognition perspective, concepts become consolidated by virtue of experiencing the events or referents they denote13,14,15, so that their ulterior activation would involve accessing relevant memory traces13, 16. Such traces, we propose, would be suboptimally entrenched in hAQ individuals given their reduced social experience. In fact, social isolation has been linked to abnormal activation of prefrontal, superior temporal, and temporo-parietal circuits82, 83 specifically recruited during social concept processing60. Accordingly, we speculate that atypicalities in such regions due to low social engagement would render social concepts harder to access or even construe (a conjecture that should be examined in future studies).
Importantly, however, we cannot ascertain whether present results are specific to social concepts or general to abstract concepts at large. Indeed, prominent accounts propose that sustained interpersonal experience is critical for grounding all types of abstract concepts, including emotional, philosophical, and spatiotemporal ones5. Unfortunately, the nST (our control condition) involved action events rather than another subcategory of abstract concepts, such as emotional concepts. Still, the ST and the nST were controlled for emotional valence and arousal, partly ruling out some such confounds. Relatedly, social concepts have been shown to make up a differentiated lexico-semantic space6 and to engage socio-cognitive regions significantly more than emotional concepts60. By the same token, our study warrants the view that social concepts might be especially (though not exclusively) dependent on interpersonal experience.
Finally, note that our findings stemmed from naturalistic narratives. Most social concept investigations have relied on randomized sequences of isolated words or sentences7, 17,18,19,20, while discourse-level studies on ASD have targeted syntactic84 and macro-structural85 aspects. Despite their major contributions, such approaches fail to capture social concepts in context-rich settings. The detection of category-specific difficulties in this study offers important support for such links, as contextual cues in natural texts may facilitate performance by priming or favoring maintenance of relevant information86. In this sense, our study meets the pressing call for more ecological insights on language processing37, 41, 87.
This study is not without limitations. First, our groups were relatively small, calling for replications with more participants. Second, the number of testing items was limited. Although our task doubles the number of trials in previous studies39, 46, future adaptations should increase this figure. Third, our protocol does not capture the relative contributions of mentalistic, empathic, or emotional abilities to the observed outcomes. Accordingly, present results may warrant alternative or complementary explanations, given that STs likely engaged these domains, which are affected in high AQ individuals28,29,30. Future works should examine or rule out such factors in this population by leveraging classical fine-grained tasks (e.g., synonym judgment, semantic feature verification)34 or by incorporating relevant socio-cognitive measures based on non-verbal stimuli—e.g., facial emotion recognition88 or picture-based empathy measures89. Fourth, future studies on high AQ individuals should leverage more tightly controlled social and non-social stimuli to enable stringent tests of group-by-condition interactions. Finally, we call for new studies to expand social concept research by involving persons with actual ASD diagnoses, including offline or online neural measures, and performing interventions to enhance or manipulate social experiences (e.g., via virtual reality) and examine their direct impact on social concept processing.
In conclusion, we showed that persons with reduced interpersonal experience presented difficulties with grasping text-level social concepts, and that such difficulties correlated with validated measures of social interaction. This evidence supports situated views of semantic processing, affording new insights on (a particular type of) abstract concepts. Future applications of our approach could promote useful breakthroughs to understand the links between (outward) social events and their (inner) cognitive construal.
Data availability
All experimental data, as well as the scripts used for their collection and analysis, are available via the Open Science Framework at http://bit.ly/3js012x.
References
Pexman, P., Diveica, V. & Binney, R. Social semantics: The organisation and grounding of abstract concepts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 378, 20210363 (2022).
Zahn, R. et al. Social concepts are represented in the superior anterior temporal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 6430–6435. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607061104 (2007).
Simmons, W. K., Reddish, M., Bellgowan, P. S. & Martin, A. The selectivity and functional connectivity of the anterior temporal lobes. Cereb. Cortex 20, 813–825. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp149 (2010).
Olson, I. R., McCoy, D., Klobusicky, E. & Ross, L. A. Social cognition and the anterior temporal lobes: A review and theoretical framework. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss119 (2013).
Borghi, A. M. Concepts for which we need others more: The case of abstract concepts. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 31, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221079625 (2022).
Harpaintner, M., Trumpp, N. M. & Kiefer, M. The semantic content of abstract concepts: A property listing study of 296 abstract words. Front. Psychol. 9, 1748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01748 (2018).
Binney, R. J., Hoffman, P. & LambonRalph, M. A. Mapping the multiple graded contributions of the anterior temporal lobe representational hub to abstract and social concepts: Evidence from distortion-corrected fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 26, 4227–4241. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw260 (2016).
Rice, G. E. & Hoffman, P. Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: An fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 25. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0136 (2018).
Lopes da Cunha, P. et al. Social concepts and the cerebellum: Behavioural and functional connectivity signatures in cerebellar ataxic patients. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 378, 20210364 (2022).
Vargas, R. & Just, M. A. Neural representations of abstract concepts: Identifying underlying neurosemantic dimensions. Cereb. Cortex 30, 2157–2166. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz229 (2020).
Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T. & Borghi, A. M. Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Lang. Cogn. 11, 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.23 (2019).
Borghi, A. M. & Barca, L. Abstract concepts, language and sociality: From acquisition to inner speech. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 25. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0134 (2018).
Barsalou, L. Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Lang. Cognit. Process. 18, 513–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000026 (2003).
Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K. & Barsalou, L. W. Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia 49, 1105–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.032 (2011).
Zwaan, R. A. Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 23, 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0864-x (2016).
Pecher, D. & Zeelenberg, R. Boundaries to grounding abstract concepts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 25. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0132 (2018).
Yang, H. & Bi, Y. From words to phrases: Neural basis of social event semantic composition. Brain Struct. Funct. 227, 1683–1695 (2022).
Wurm, M. F. & Caramazza, A. Distinct roles of temporal and frontoparietal cortex in representing actions across vision and language. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–10 (2019).
Groen, W. et al. Semantic, factual, and social language comprehension in adolescents with autism: An FMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 20, 1937–1945 (2010).
Tesink, C. M. et al. Neural correlates of language comprehension in autism spectrum disorders: When language conflicts with world knowledge. Neuropsychologia 49, 1095–1104 (2011).
Dolan, M. & Fullam, R. Theory of mind and mentalizing ability in antisocial personality disorders with and without psychopathy. Psychol. Med. 34, 1093–1102 (2004).
Bosacki, S., Moreira, F. P., Sitnik, V., Andrews, K. & Talwar, V. Theory of mind, self-knowledge, and perceptions of loneliness in emerging adolescents. J. Genet. Psychol. 181, 14–31 (2020).
Idsoe, T. et al. Bullying victimization and trauma. Front. Psych. 11, 480353 (2021).
Birba, A. et al. Multimodal neurocognitive markers of naturalistic discourse typify diverse neurodegenerative diseases. Cereb. Cortex https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab421 (2021).
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J. & Clubley, E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 31, 5–17 (2001).
Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. Are autistic traits an independent personality dimension? A study of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and the NEO-PI-R. Personal. Individ. Differ. 41, 873–883 (2006).
Alvarez, A. & Reid, S. Autism and Personality: Findings from the Tavistock Autism Workshop (Routledge, 2013).
Padrón, I. et al. Multisession anodal tDCS on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction improves mentalizing processes in adults with autistic traits. Brain Sci. 12, 30 (2021).
Sevgi, M., Diaconescu, A. O., Henco, L., Tittgemeyer, M. & Schilbach, L. Social Bayes: Using Bayesian modeling to study autistic trait–related differences in social cognition. Biol. Psychiatr. 87, 185–193 (2020).
Gökçen, E., Frederickson, N. & Petrides, K. Theory of mind and executive control deficits in typically developing adults and adolescents with high levels of autism traits. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 2072–2087 (2016).
Lui, M., Lau, G. K. B., Han, Y. M. Y., Yuen, K. C. P. & Sommer, W. Strong relationship between rapid auditory processing and affective prosody recognition among adults with high autistic traits. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 20, 1–14 (2022).
Davidson, M. M., Kaushanskaya, M. & Ellis Weismer, S. Reading comprehension in children with and without ASD: The role of word reading, oral language, and working memory. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 48, 3524–3541 (2018).
Rosello, B., Berenguer, C., Baixauli, I., García, R. & Miranda, A. Theory of mind profiles in children with autism spectrum disorder: Adaptive/social skills and pragmatic competence. Front. Psychol. 11, 567401 (2020).
Zahn, R. et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration and social behaviour: Dissociation between the knowledge of its consequences and its conceptual meaning. Cortex 93, 107–118 (2017).
Wang, X. et al. Social and emotion dimensional organizations in the abstract semantic space: The neuropsychological evidence. Sci. Rep. 11, 23572 (2021).
Birba, A. et al. Motor-system dynamics during naturalistic reading of action narratives in first and second language. Neuroimage 216, 116820 (2020).
Birba, A. et al. Electrifying discourse: Anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex selectively reduces action appraisal in naturalistic narratives. Cortex 132, 460–472 (2020).
Moguilner, S. et al. Multimodal neurocognitive markers of frontal lobe epilepsy: Insights from ecological text processing. Neuroimage 235, 117998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117998 (2021).
Trevisan, P., Sedeño, L., Birba, A., Ibáñez, A. & García, A. M. A moving story: Whole-body motor training selectively improves the appraisal of action meanings in naturalistic narratives. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).
Cervetto, S., Birba, A., Pérez, G., Amoruso, L. & García, A. M. Body into narrative: Behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of action text processing after ecological motor training. Neuroscience 507, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.10.024 (2022).
Hasson, U., Egidi, G., Marelli, M. & Willems, R. M. Grounding the neurobiology of language in first principles: The necessity of non-language-centric explanations for language comprehension. Cognition 180, 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.018 (2018).
Dam, W. O. V., Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Lindemann, O. & Bekkering, H. J. F. I. P. Context effects in embodied lexical-semantic processing. Front. Psychol. 1, 150 (2010).
Raven, J. Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment 223–237 (Springer, 2003).
Rodrigo, M. J., Padrón, I., De Vega, M. & Ferstl, E. C. Adolescents’ risky decision-making activates neural networks related to social cognition and cognitive control processes. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 60 (2014).
Dunn, L. & Dunn, L. Examiner’s Manual for the PPVT-III. Form IIIA and IIIB. Technical report (1997).
Garcia, A. M. et al. Parkinson’s disease compromises the appraisal of action meanings evoked by naturalistic texts. Cortex 100, 111–126 (2018).
Trevisan, P. & García, A. M. Systemic functional grammar as a tool for experimental stimulus design: New appliable horizons in psycholinguistics and neurolinguistics. Lang. Sci. 75, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101237 (2019).
Davis, C. J. & Perea, M. BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behav. Res. Methods 37, 665–671 (2005).
Pazos, F. S. Sistemas Predictivos de Legibilidad del Mensaje Escrito: Fórmula de Perspicuidad (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1993).
Barrio-Cantalejo, I. M. et al. Validación de la Escala INFLESZ para evaluar la legibilidad de los textos dirigidos a pacientes. SciELO Espana 31, 135–152 (2008).
San Miguel Abella, R. A. & González-Nosti, M. Motor content norms for 4,565 verbs in Spanish. Behav. Res. Methods 52, 447–454 (2020).
Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., Kemper, S. J., Herman, R. & Covington, M. A. Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 540–545 (2008).
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Academic Press, 2013).
Manly, B. F. & Alberto, J. A. N. Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer (Chapman and Hall, 2016).
Cawley, G. C. & Talbot, N. L. Efficient leave-one-out cross-validation of kernel fisher discriminant classifiers. Pattern Recogn. 36, 2585–2592 (2003).
Team, R. C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2021).
Sasson, N. J., Morrison, K. E., Kelsven, S. & Pinkham, A. E. Social cognition as a predictor of functional and social skills in autistic adults without intellectual disability. Autism Res. 13, 259–270 (2020).
Barendse, E. M. et al. Working memory deficits in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging correlates. J. Neurodev. Disord. 5, 1–11 (2013).
Kamio, Y., Robins, D., Kelley, E., Swainson, B. & Fein, D. Atypical lexical/semantic processing in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders without early language delay. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 1116–1122 (2007).
Arioli, M., Gianelli, C. & Canessa, N. Neural representation of social concepts: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Brain Imaging Behav. 15, 1912–1921 (2021).
Itahashi, T. et al. Altered network topologies and hub organization in adults with autism: A resting-state fMRI study. PLoS One 9, e94115 (2014).
Kana, R. K. et al. Aberrant functioning of the theory-of-mind network in children and adolescents with autism. Mol. Autism 6, 1–12 (2015).
Schulte-Rüther, M. et al. Dysfunctions in brain networks supporting empathy: An fMRI study in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Soc. Neurosci. 6, 1–21 (2011).
Harms, M. B., Martin, A. & Wallace, G. L. Facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorders: A review of behavioral and neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychol. Rev. 20, 290–322 (2010).
Philip, R. C. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the fMRI investigation of autism spectrum disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 901–942 (2012).
Wang, Q. et al. Resting-state abnormalities in functional connectivity of the default mode network in autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Brain Imaging Behav. 15, 2583–2592 (2021).
Duijkers, J. C., Vissers, C. T. W., Verbeeck, W., Arntz, A. & Egger, J. I. Social cognition in the differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders and personality disorders. Clin. Neuropsychiatry 20, 20 (2014).
Berenguer, C., Miranda, A., Colomer, C., Baixauli, I. & Roselló, B. Contribution of theory of mind, executive functioning, and pragmatics to socialization behaviors of children with high-functioning autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 48, 430–441 (2018).
Löytömäki, J., Ohtonen, P., Laakso, M. L. & Huttunen, K. The role of linguistic and cognitive factors in emotion recognition difficulties in children with ASD, ADHD or DLD. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 55, 231–242 (2020).
Gilotty, L., Kenworthy, L., Sirian, L., Black, D. O. & Wagner, A. E. Adaptive skills and executive function in autism spectrum disorders. Child Neuropsychol. 8, 241–248 (2002).
Miranda, M. et al. An action-concept processing advantage in a patient with a double motor cortex. Brain Cogn. 156, 105831 (2022).
Cervetto, S. et al. Action semantics at the bottom of the brain: Insights from dysplastic cerebellar gangliocytoma. Front. Psychol. 20, 1194 (2018).
Zhang, M. et al. Exploring the spatial working memory and visual perception in children with autism spectrum disorder and general population with high autism-like traits. PLoS One 15, e0235552 (2020).
Habib, A., Harris, L., Pollick, F. & Melville, C. A meta-analysis of working memory in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. PLoS One 14, e0216198 (2019).
Luo, S. X., Shinall, J. A., Peterson, B. S. & Gerber, A. J. Semantic mapping reveals distinct patterns in descriptions of social relations in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 9, 846–853 (2016).
Wallace, G. L. et al. Diminished sensitivity to sad facial expressions in high functioning autism spectrum disorders is associated with symptomatology and adaptive functioning. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 41, 1475–1486 (2011).
Fitzpatrick, P. et al. Relationship between theory of mind, emotion recognition, and social synchrony in adolescents with and without autism. Front. Psychol. 9, 1337 (2018).
Boraston, Z., Blakemore, S.-J., Chilvers, R. & Skuse, D. Impaired sadness recognition is linked to social interaction deficit in autism. Neuropsychologia 45, 1501–1510 (2007).
Noriega, G. Restricted, repetitive, and stereotypical patterns of behavior in autism—an fmri perspective. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 27, 1139–1148 (2019).
Spengler, S., Bird, G. & Brass, M. Hyperimitation of actions is related to reduced understanding of others’ minds in autism spectrum conditions. Biol. Psychiatr. 68, 1148–1155 (2010).
Jones, C. R. G. et al. The association between theory of mind, executive function, and the symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 11, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1873 (2018).
Zovetti, N. & Rossetti, M. G. Neuroimaging studies exploring the neural basis of social isolation. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 30, e29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796021000135 (2021).
Shen, C. et al. Associations of social isolation and loneliness with later dementia. Neurology 99, e164–e175 (2022).
Capps, L., Losh, M. & Thurber, C. “The frog ate the bug and made his mouth sad”: Narrative competence in children with autism. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 28, 193–204 (2000).
Baixauli, I., Colomer, C., Roselló, B. & Miranda, A. Narratives of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Res. Dev. Disabil. 59, 234–254 (2016).
Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., Swaab, T. Y. & Gordon, P. C. Reading words in discourse: The modulation of lexical priming effects by message-level context. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 5, 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582306289573 (2006).
Desai, R. H., Choi, W., Lai, V. T. & Henderson, J. M. Toward semantics in the wild: Activation to manipulable nouns in naturalistic reading. J. Neurosci. 36, 4050–4055. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1480-15.2016 (2016).
Funkiewiez, A., Bertoux, M., de Souza, L. C., Lévy, R. & Dubois, B. The SEA (Social cognition and Emotional Assessment): A clinical neuropsychological tool for early diagnosis of frontal variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuropsychol. Rev. 26, 81 (2012).
Akitsuki, Y. & Decety, J. Social context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: An event-related fMRI investigation. Neuroimage 47, 722–734 (2009).
Acknowledgements
AB is supported by a postdoctoral Juan de la Cierva-formación contract from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. JLP is a Ph.D. student at the University of Hull and research and teaching assistant at the University of La Laguna. ILS is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund under Grant RTI 2018-098149-B-100 to IL. AMG is an Atlantic Fellow at the Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI) and is partially supported by the National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health (R01AG075775); ANID (FONDECYT Regular 1210176, 1210195); GBHI, Alzheimer’s Association, and Alzheimer’s Society (Alzheimer’s Association GBHI ALZ UK-22-865742); and the Multi-partner Consortium to Expand Dementia Research in Latin America (ReDLat), which is supported by the Fogarty International Center and the National Institutes of Health, the National Institutes of Aging (R01AG057234, R01AG075775, R01AG21051, and CARDS-NIH), Alzheimer’s Association (SG-20-725707), Rainwater Charitable Foundation’s Tau Consortium, the Bluefield Project to Cure Frontotemporal Dementia and the Global Brain Health Institute. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of these institutions. We want to thank the staff at Programa de Atención a Estudiantes con Necesidades Específicas de Apoyo Educativo from University of La Laguna, as well as Asociación Canaria del Trastorno del Espectro Autista, for their help with participant recruitment. Additional thanks go to Santiago Rodríguez León for his help recording the audio materials.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.B.: methodology, formal analysis, data curation, investigation, writing—original draft. J.L.P.: resources, data curation, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing. I.L.S.: resources, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, writing—review and editing. A.M.G.: conceptualization, validation, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, supervision.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Birba, A., López-Pigüi, J., León Santana, I. et al. Impaired social concept processing in persons with autistic-like traits. Sci Rep 13, 15709 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42889-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42889-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.