Abstract
Some older adults with spinal deformity maintain standing posture via pelvic compensation when their center of gravity moves forward. Therefore, evaluations of global alignment should include both pelvic tilt (PT) and seventh cervical vertebra-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA). Here, we evaluate standing postures of older adults using C7-SVA with PT and investigate factors related to postural abnormality. This cross-sectional study used an established population-based cohort in Japan wherein 1121 participants underwent sagittal whole-spine radiography in a standing position and bioelectrical impedance analysis for muscle mass measurements. Presence of low back pain (LBP), visual analog scale (VAS) of LBP, and LBP-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) were evaluated. Based on the PT and C7-SVA, the participants were divided into four groups: normal, compensated, non-compensated, and decompensated. We defined the latter three categories as “malalignment” and examined group characteristics and factors. There were significant differences in ODI%, VAS and prevalence of LBP, and sarcopenia among the four groups, although these were non-significant between non-compensated and decompensated groups on stratified analysis. Moreover, the decompensated group was significantly associated with sarcopenia. Individuals with pelvic compensation are at increased risk for LBP and related disorders even with the C7-SVA maintained within normal range.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
With the increasing aging population, the incidence of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has increased1. There has been growing interest in conservative and surgical treatment for ASD that is aimed at extending healthy life expectancy2,3,4. There are several classification systems, and diagnoses are determined by radiographic evaluation of coronal and sagittal inconsistencies5,6. In recent years, there has been extensive research on sagittal inconsistencies, quality of life (QoL) scores, and clinical outcomes related to patient health. Sagittal inconsistencies have been demonstrated to be strongly associated with poor QoL7,8.
Studies have revealed that evaluation of sagittal alignment is essential in assessing spinal pathology9,10. Some older adults maintain the standing position while preventing the center of gravity from moving forward using pelvic compensation. According to Dubousset’s “cone of economy”11, a person who is significantly deviated from the center of the sagittal cone needs more energy to maintain the standing position. This sagittal shift and resulting compensatory mechanism generally begin with the loss of lumbar lordosis, which can involve the entire lower extremity and occur on a continuum11,12,13. Meanwhile, compensation restores alignment and enables an upright gait, which helps to maintain and normalize gait patterns that can be disrupted by spinal deformity12. As it uses the natural mobility of the hip joint, pelvic compensation is the first compensatory mechanism to restore sagittal balance, which leads to increased pelvic tilt (PT)13,14,15. Therefore, it is insufficient to evaluate global alignment with only the seventh cervical vertebra-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA); it is equally important to evaluate pelvic compensation based on PT. Nonetheless, despite its proven clinical value, data on the assessment and characterization of compensatory mechanisms within a large general population are limited. Hence, this study focused on the combination of global sagittal alignment and pelvic compensation to evaluate the standing posture in elderly patients and investigated the factors related to abnormal posturing.
Results
Participants’ demographic data and characteristics of the four groups according to the C7-SVA and PT
The characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. The body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in women than in men (P = 0.027). Table 2 shows the characteristics of the four groups according to the C7-SVA and PT. The number of participants in each group and the average age per group were 606 and 64.3 years in the normal group, 333 and 68.9 years in the compensated group, 53 and 75.0 years in the non-compensated group, and 129 and 76.8 years in the decompensated group, respectively. The proportion of men was 38% in the normal group, 21% in the compensated group, 57% in the non-compensated group, and 20% in the decompensated group. Among the 1121 qualified participants from the Wakayama Spine Study, 515 (126 men and 389 women) had malalignment. The prevalence of malalignment increased with age: < 50 years, 19%; 50 s, 29%; 60 s, 40%; 70 s, 54%; and > 80 years, 69%. In women, the prevalence of malalignment was significantly higher among those aged > 60 years (40.3% in men vs. 57.6% in women, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1).
Prevalence of low back pain and sarcopenia
There was a significant difference in the prevalence of low back pain (LBP), visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) %, and prevalence of sarcopenia among the four groups (all P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, these parameters were not significantly different between the non-compensated and decompensated groups in the stratified analysis (P = 0.119, P = 0.135, P = 0.184, and P = 0.472, respectively).
Factors associated with low back pain and low back pain-related disability
Table 3 shows the factors associated with LBP and related disorders. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, increasing age and BMI were significantly associated with LBP-related disability (ODI% ≥ 21) and sarcopenia, respectively. The compensated and decompensated conditions were significantly associated with LBP (odds ratios [ORs] 1.54 and 2.78, respectively). Malalignment (compensated, non-compensated, and decompensated conditions) was also significantly associated with LBP-associated disability (ODI% ≥ 21) (ORs 1.56, 2.76, and 3.97, respectively). In addition, the decompensated condition was significantly associated with sarcopenia (OR 2.84).
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this observational study is the first population-based study to focus on the combination of global alignment and pelvic compensation to evaluate the standing posture in elderly patients and investigate factors related to abnormal posturing. We found that the pelvic compensatory function for abnormal posturing changes with age. Moreover, the results suggest that this compensatory effect has sex-specific differences. Groups with pelvic retroversion comprised more women regardless of whether the C7-SVA was maintained within 50 mm; this difference may be owing to sex-specific differences in spinal flexibility and muscle strength16. Furthermore, the results suggest that individuals with pelvic compensation are at increased risk of developing LBP and related disorders even if the C7-SVA is maintained within the normal range.
As the aging population continues to grow, so does the prevalence of musculoskeletal diseases, such as spinal disorders. ASD has gained significant attention in the last 10 years, leading to improvements in diagnostic tools, classification schemes, and surgical techniques2,3,4,5. Furthermore, sagittal malalignment correlates with poor clinical outcomes, LBP, and low health-related QoL in patients with lumbar degenerative disorders, especially those with ASD6,7. Previous studies have demonstrated that surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment in improving outcomes of patients with ASD14,17. It is likely that surgical treatment of a grossly disrupted spinal alignment is appropriate11,12. We believe that studies that reject conservative treatment for ASD lack detailed consideration of pelvic compensation. Our study revealed that it is insufficient to only treat sagittal inconsistencies and that pelvic compensation must also be considered.
Even if the global alignment is maintained within the normal range, patients with pelvic compensation will experience back pain and decreased performance of activities of daily living. In other words, those who manage to maintain their global alignment within the normal range through pelvic compensation need treatment before the onset of LBP. Kamata et al.18 reported that even if the global sagittal alignment is maintained by pelvic compensation in the resting position, pelvic compensation disappears at the start of walking, and global sagittal alignment collapses. Irreversible deformation may occur in the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs in patients who have undergone failed C7-SVA alignment19,20. Individuals for whom the C7-SVA is maintained by pelvic compensation may have LBP due to disuse of the back muscles rather than degeneration of the intervertebral discs or osteoporotic deformation of the vertebral bodies21. LBP, as experienced in the compensated group, may be relieved by physiotherapy of the back muscles. Regarding conservative therapies, Takahashi et al.22 reported that orthotic treatment (which limits anteflexion so as not to affect back muscles), stretching of the hip extensor muscles, and muscle strengthening are effective. Other studies have reported a high pelvic incidence (PI) as a characteristic of patients who respond to conservative treatment43. Specific exercises, such as strengthening of the gluteal muscles, were reportedly effective44. The results of the present study clarified that women aged ≥ 60 years with compensated spinal alignment should be considered for conservative therapies. Women aged ≥ 60 years in the compensated group, especially those with a high PI, may benefit from gluteal muscle strengthening. By understanding the appropriate target group for conservative intervention, it is possible to reduce the number of patients requiring surgery for sarcopenia in the decompensated group.
This study has several limitations, including selection bias and a cross-sectional design. As such, a causal relationship cannot be determined, although it is possible to speculate this. Cause-and-effect may be clarified through longitudinal analysis in the future. Compared to the normal group, the compensated group had a higher mean age, and the decompensated group had an even higher mean age, suggesting that the compensated group eventually becomes the decompensated group over time. We speculate that there are two pathways or pathological stages in the progression of adult spinal deformity: the “Normal group → Compensated group → Decompensated group” pathway and the “Normal group → Non-compensated group” pathway. A longitudinal study is planned in the future to clarify the process of progression of exacerbation with age. Another limitation was the exclusion of 341 participants with missing ODI% data from the analysis; we did not perform missing data analysis for these 341 participants since we considered them to be completely random.
Conclusions
In conclusion, pelvic compensatory function for abnormal posture changes with age, and this compensatory effect differs between men and women. Regardless of whether the C7-SVA was maintained within 50 mm, more women had pelvic retroversion. Furthermore, the results of this study suggest that individuals with pelvic compensation are at increased risk of developing LBP and related disorders even if the C7-SVA is maintained within the normal range.
Materials and methods
Participants
This cross-sectional study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of Wakayama Medical University (no.373) and the University of Tokyo (nos.1264 and 1326). All participants provided written informed consent for their participation and for the publication of the study in print and electronic form. The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. This study assessed a sub-cohort drawn from the Research on Osteoarthritis/Osteoporosis Against Disability (ROAD) study—a large-scale prospective study of bone and joint diseases using population-based cohorts in Japan. The ROAD study, which commenced in 2005, is a nationwide prospective study designed to establish epidemiological indices for evaluating bone and joint diseases. It comprises population-based cohorts from three communities in Japan: a mountainous region in Hidakagawa, Wakayama; a coastal region in Taiji, Wakayama; and an urban region in Itabashi, Tokyo. Details of the study have been described previously23,24; therefore, only a brief summary is provided here.
Briefly, subjects included participants of the third visit of the ROAD study, which commenced in 2012 and was completed in 2013. In addition to the former participants, inhabitants of mountainous and coastal areas in the Wakayama Prefecture who were willing to participate in the ROAD survey were also included in the third visit.
Overall, 1575 individuals (513 men and 1062 women) participated in the third visit of the ROAD study. Of the 1575 participants, 113 who could maintain the standing position while undergoing whole-spine lateral radiography were excluded. In addition, we excluded 341 patients who lacked data on three or more items of the ODI questionnaire25 following previous studies26. Finally, 1121 participants (355 men and 766 women) met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 2). Demographic measurements included height (m), weight (kg), and BMI [weight (kg)/height × 2 (m2)].
Radiographic assessment
Standing lateral radiographs of the whole spine were obtained for each participant by licensed radiography technicians using a 40-inch film. Films were positioned so that the bones from C2 to the proximal femur were in the range. Each radiograph was aligned such that the film edge was the reference for vertical alignment. As described previously27, participants were instructed to stand in a comfortable position with their hips and knees fully extended. The arms were flexed with the hands resting on supports at the level of the shoulders. The following parameters were measured on lateral radiographs28,29,30: (1) PT was measured as the angle between the line connecting the midpoint of the sacral plate to the axes of the femoral heads and the vertical axis; and (2) C7-SVA was measured as the horizontal distance from the C7 plumb line originating at the middle of the C7 vertebral body to the posterior superior endplate of S1.
Participants were divided into four groups, which are original to this research (with reference to a previous study)29. The four groups were defined based on the PT and C7-SVA as follows: normal group (PT < 20°; C7-SVA < 50 mm), compensated group (PT ≥ 20°; C7-SVA < 50 mm), non-compensated group (PT < 20°; C7-SVA ≥ 50 mm), and decompensated group (PT ≥ 20°; C7-SVA ≥ 50 mm) (Fig. 3). The latter three categories were defined as “malalignment,” and the characteristics and factors related to each group were examined.
Assessment of low back pain and low back pain-related disability
Experienced board-certified orthopedic surgeons asked all participants the following questions: “Have you experienced low back pain on most days during the past month, in addition to right now?” Those who answered “yes” were defined as having LBP based on previous studies31,32 and in the current study.
LBP-related disability was evaluated using the ODI, which calculates the degree of disability during daily activities, including personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, and sleeping25,26. The ODI was scored from 0 to 100%, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of disability. Based on a previous report33, we considered patients with ODI scores of ≥ 21% as having an LBP-related disability.
Assessment of sarcopenia
We defined sarcopenia based on the following recommended cut-off values of skeletal muscle mass according to the report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia34: 1) age 60 or 65 years at sarcopenia diagnosis (according to country-wise definition of elderly); 2) low appendicular skeletal muscle mass (using bioimpedance analysis), 7.0 kg/m2 for men and 5.7 kg/m2 for women; 3) low handgrip strength, < 26 kg for men and < 18 kg for women; 4) low gait speed (normal gait speed ≤ 0.8 m/s).
In the present study, we considered subjects as having sarcopenia if they had a low skeletal muscle mass with low handgrip strength or low gait speed. Handgrip strength, walking speed, and muscle mass were measured as follows:
Handgrip strength was measured using a handgrip dynamometer (Toei Light Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan). Both hands were tested, and the greater value was noted as the maximum handgrip strength. Usual walking speed was measured as the index of muscle function. The time taken (in seconds) to walk a distance of 6 m at normal walking speed in a hallway was manually assessed using a stopwatch, and the usual gait speed was calculated.
Skeletal muscle mass
Skeletal muscle mass was measured with bioimpedance analysis35,36,37,38,39 using the Body Composition Analyzer MC-190 (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan). We used the protocol described by Tanimoto et al. (as cited by Strasser et al. and Chow et al.)40,41, which has been validated by Nemoto et al. (as cited by Bess et al.)42. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass is the sum of the muscle mass of the arms and legs. Absolute appendicular skeletal muscle mass was converted to a skeletal muscle mass index by dividing the appendicular skeletal muscle mass by height in meters squared (kg/m2).
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were determined and are presented as mean and standard deviation or frequency and percentage, unless otherwise specified. Differences in proportions were examined using the Chi-square test. When the expected cell size was < 5, Fisher’s exact test was performed. Differences in continuous values between men and women were examined using Student’s t-test. Student’s t-test was performed after confirming that data were normally distributed using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. Differences in proportions were examined using the Chi-square test. When significant differences were determined in the whole-group analysis, pairwise comparison was performed using Tukey’s wholly significant difference test. Risk factors for LBP, LBP-related disability (ODI% ≥ 21), and sarcopenia were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with the normal group as the reference group. When we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis, we limited the number of explanatory variables to one-tenth of the smaller number of events to ensure statistical power by referring to a previous study45. ORs and 95% confidence intervals as well as p values were calculated. Other factors related to the person were analyzed on a per person basis. In the multivariate logistic regression models, age, sex, and BMI were included in all models as they are basic cohort factors. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro version 16 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A P value < 0.05 was set to indicate statistical significance.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. This is not to restrict the use of our dataset but to allow the Research Ethics Committee of Wakayama Medical University and Tokyo University to understand the actual use of the dataset.
Change history
07 August 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39895-9
References
Sing, D. C., Berven, S. H., Burch, S. & Metz, L. N. Increase in spinal deformity surgery in patients age 60 and older is not associated with increased complications. Spine J. 17, 627–635 (2017).
Crimmins, E. M. Lifespan and healthspan: Past, present, and promise. Gerontologist 55, 901–911 (2015).
Murata, S. et al. Kitchen elbow sign predicts surgical outcomes in adults with spinal deformity: A retrospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 11, 12859 (2021).
Jagger, C. et al. Inequalities in healthy life years in the 25 countries of the European union in 2005: A cross-national meta-regression analysis. Lancet 372, 2124–2131 (2008).
Smith, J. S., Shaffrey, C. I., Ames, C. P. & Lenke, L. G. Treatment of adult thoracolumbar spinal deformity: Past, present, and future. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 30, 551–567 (2019).
Ames, C. P. et al. Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: A review. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 16, 547–564 (2012).
Endo, K., Suzuki, H., Tanaka, H., Kang, Y. & Yamamoto, K. Sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Eur. Spine J. 19, 435–438 (2010).
Glassman, S. D. et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30, 2024–2029 (2005).
Lafage, V., Schwab, F., Patel, A., Hawkinson, N. & Farcy, J. P. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa) 1976(34), E599–E606 (2009).
Everett, C. R. & Patel, R. K. A systematic literature review of nonsurgical treatment in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(19), S130–S134 (2007).
Dubousset, J. Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice (ed. Weinstein, S. L.) 479–496 (Raven Press Ltd., 1994).
Smith, J. S. et al. Spontaneous improvement of cervical alignment after correction of global sagittal balance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 17, 300–307 (2012).
Smith, J. S. et al. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery 65, 86–93; discussion 93–94 (2009).
Kelly, M. P. et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 101, 338–352 (2019).
Bridwell, K. H. et al. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34, 2171–2178 (2009).
Okabe, T. et al. Sex differences in age-related physical changes among community-dwelling adults. J. Clin. Med. 10, 4800 (2021).
Smith, J. S. et al. Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity: a prospective, multicenter, propensity-matched cohort assessment with minimum 2-year follow-up. Neurosurgery 78, 851–861 (2016).
Kamata, K. et al. Spino-pelvic-lower extremity balance during walking in elderly patients with spinal kyphosis. J. Orthop. Sci. 24, 793–797 (2019).
Takemitsu, Y., Harada, Y., Iwahara, T., Miyamoto, M. & Miyatake, Y. Lumbar degenerative kyphosis. Clinical, radiological and epidemiological studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13, 1317–1326 (1988).
Nakamura, T., Ozawa, H. & Itoi, E. Symptomatology of patients with the abnormal sagittal alignment in the thoracic and lumber spine. Spine Spinal Cord. 26, 645–652 (2013).
Sasaki, T. et al. MRI-defined paraspinal muscle morphology in Japanese population: the Wakayama Spine study. PLoS ONE 12, e0187765 (2017).
Takahashi, N., Omata, J. I., Iwabuchi, M., Fukuda, H. & Shirado, O. Therapeutic efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy versus exercise therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a prospective study. Fukushima J. Med. Sci. 63, 8–15 (2017).
Yoshimura, N. et al. Cohort profile: Research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 39, 988–995 (2010).
Yoshimura, N. et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and osteoporosis in Japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 27, 620–628 (2009).
Fairbank, J. C., Couper, J., Davies, J. B. & O’Brien, J. P. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66, 271–273 (1980).
McNeely, E. L., Zhang, B., Neuman, B. J. & Skolasky, R. L. Estimating measurement error of the Oswestry disability index with missing data. Spine J. 22, 975–982 (2022).
Zhu, Z. et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic adults: norms in Chinese populations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39, E1–E6 (2014).
Legaye, J., Duval-Beaupère, G., Hecquet, J. & Marty, C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur. Spine J. 7, 99–103 (1998).
Schwab, F., Patel, A., Ungar, B., Farcy, J. P. & Lafage, V. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35, 2224–2231 (2010).
Schwab, F. et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: A validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37, 1077–1082 (2012).
Teraguchi, M. et al. The association of combination of disc degeneration, end plate signal change, and Schmorl node with low back pain in a large population study: The Wakayama Spine Study. Spine J. 15, 622–628 (2015).
Ishimoto, Y. et al. The impact of lumbar spinal stenosis, knee osteoarthritis, and loss of lumbar lordosis on the quality of life: findings from the Katsuragi low back pain study. Spine Surg. Relat. Res. 3, 157–162 (2019).
Yakut, E. et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29, 581–585; discussion 585 (2004).
Chen, L. K. et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: Consensus report of the Asian working group for sarcopenia. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 15, 95–101 (2014).
National Institutes of Health (US). Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement: National institutes of health technology assessment conference statement. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 64(3), 524S-532S (1996).
Janssen, I., Heymsfield, S. B., Baumgartner, R. N. & Ross, R. Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis. J. Appl. Physiol. 1985(89), 465–471 (2000).
Kyle, U. G., Genton, L., Slosman, D. O. & Pichard, C. Fat-free and fat mass percentiles in 5225 healthy subjects aged 15 to 98 years. Nutrition 17, 534–541 (2001).
Kyle, U. G., Genton, L., Karsegard, L., Slosman, D. O. & Pichard, C. Single prediction equation for bioelectrical impedance analysis in adults aged 20–94 years. Nutrition 17, 248–253 (2001).
Roubenoff, R. et al. Application of bioelectrical impedance analysis to elderly populations. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 52, M129–M136 (1997).
Tanimoto, Y. et al. Association between sarcopenia and higher-level functional capacity in daily living in community-dwelling elderly subjects in Japan. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 55, e9–e13 (2012).
Tanimoto, Y. et al. Association of sarcopenia with functional decline in community-dwelling elderly subjects in Japan. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 13, 958–963 (2013).
Nemoto, M. et al. Validity of the bioelectrical impedance method for assessing body composition in non-frail and pre-frail older adults. Int J Body (comp. Res). 10, 55–61 (2012).
Cheung, J. P. Y., Wong, H. L. & Cheung, P. W. H. Predictive factors for successful non-operative treatment and achieving MCID improvement in health-related quality of life in adult spinal deformity. BMC Musculoskelet, Disord. 23, 802 (2002).
Lee, K. Y., Lee, J. H. & Im, S. K. Effect of gluteal muscle strengthening exercise on sagittal balance and muscle volume in adult spinal deformity following long-segment fixation surgery. Sci. Rep. 12, 9063. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13190-5 (2022).
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R. & Feinstein, A. R. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 49, 1373–1379 (1996).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mrs. Tomoko Takijiri and other members of the Public Office in Hidakagawa Town, and Mrs. Tamako Tsutsumi, Mrs. Kanami Maeda, and other members of the Public Office in Taiji Town for their assistance in locating and scheduling participants for examinations.
Funding
This study was supported by Grant-in-Aid funding from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 21FA0601 (Director, HY), and Scientific Research Grants 26462249, 21K09306 (HH); This study was also supported by GRANTs from the Japan Osteoporosis Society (NY and HO), a Grant from JA Kyosai Research Institute (HO), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) Research C (17K10937, 20K09509) (MT), and a Grant from the Japanese Orthopedics and Traumatology Foundation, Inc (No. 287) (MT). This work was supported by H25-Choujyu-007 (Director, NY), and H25-Nanchitou (Men)-005 (Director, ST), 19FA1401 (Director, ST), and 19FA0701 (Director, HO). The study was also supported by Scientific Research Grants B19H03895, B26293139, B23390172, and B20390182, and Challenging Exploratory Research Grants 18K18447, 15K15219, and 24659317 (NY), Challenging Exploratory Research Grants 24659666 and 21659349 and Young Scientists A18689031 (HO), and Collaborating Research with NSF from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan 08033011-00262 (Director, NY). The study was partly supported by Grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (17dk0110028h0001, Director, NY; 17gk0210007h0003, and 19gk0210018h0002, Director, ST). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: S.M., H.H., M.T., H.I., A.M., Y.N., and H.Y. Data curation: S.M., H.H., M.T., Y.I., and K.N. Formal analysis: S.M., H.H., and H.O. Investigation: S.M. Methodology: S.M., H.H., and H.Y. Project administration: H.H., N.Y., and M.Y. Resources: H.O. Software: H.O. Supervision: S.T., N.Y., M.Y., and H.Y. Validation: S.M., H.H., and H.O. Visualization: S.M. Writing—original draft: S.M. Writing—review & editing: H.H.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained an error in the order of Figures 1, 2 and 3. Full information regarding the correction made can be found in the Correction for this Article.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Murata, S., Hashizume, H., Tsutsui, S. et al. Pelvic compensation accompanying spinal malalignment and back pain-related factors in a general population: the Wakayama spine study. Sci Rep 13, 11862 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39044-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39044-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.