Abstract
Catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) is involved in detoxification of catechol estrogens, playing cancer-protective role in cells producing or utilizing estrogen. Moreover, COMT suppressed migration potential of breast cancer (BC) cells. To delineate COMT role in metastasis of estrogen receptor (ER) dependent BC, we investigated the effect of COMT overexpression on invasion, transcriptome, proteome and interactome of MCF7 cells, a luminal A BC model, stably transduced with lentiviral vector carrying COMT gene (MCF7-COMT). 2D and 3D assays revealed that COMT overexpression associates with decreased cell invasion (p < 0.0001 for Transwell assay, p < 0.05 for spheroid formation). RNA-Seq and LC-DIA-MS/MS proteomics identified genes associated with invasion (FTO, PIR, TACSTD2, ANXA3, KRT80, S100P, PREX1, CLEC3A, LCP1) being downregulated in MCF7-COMT cells, while genes associated with less aggressive phenotype (RBPMS, ROBO2, SELENBP, EPB41L2) were upregulated both at transcript (|log2FC|> 1, adj. p < 0.05) and protein (|log2FC|> 0.58, q < 0.05) levels. Importantly, proteins driving MET signaling were less abundant in COMT overexpressing cells, and pull-down confirmed interaction between COMT and Kunitz-type protease inhibitor 2 (SPINT2), a negative regulator of MET (log2FC = 5.10, q = 1.04−7). In conclusion, COMT may act as tumor suppressor in ER dependent BC not only by detoxification of catechol estrogens but also by suppressing cell invasion and interplay with MET pathway.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Estrogens are among very few aromatic molecules circulating in the human body and contribute to an elevated breast cancer risk involving estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated cell proliferation associated with spontaneous replication error. Likewise, a complementary pathway involving indirect and direct genotoxicity caused by estrogen metabolites, such as 16α-hydroxyestrone, catechol estrogens and estrogen quinones participate in the mechanism1.
Catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) occurs in variable amounts in most tissues such as endometrium and mammary gland2,3 and plays an essential role in detoxification of catechol substrates by transferring a methyl group from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) to one of the hydroxyls in a molecule of a substrate2. Along with NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), it is quantitatively the most significant contributor to inactivation of catechol estrogens4, intermediates in the formation of reactive oxygen species causing different types of DNA damage in breast tissue1,5,6. COMT blocks estrogenicity of catechol metabolites of estradiol and estrone, particularly 2-hydroxy and 4-hydroxy estradiol/estrone, and prevents their oxidation to reactive quinones4,7. On top of that, methoxyestrogens formed by COMT, especially 2-methoxyestradiol, also have tumor-suppressing properties and cardioprotective effects mediated through antiangiogenic and growth inhibitory effects. Hence, COMT generates a potentially protective metabolites along with blocking genotoxic effects of catechol estrogens4,8.
Therefore, COMT has become a research target as a possible tumor suppressor in breast cancer. Studies have focused on its functional polymorphisms which have been considered to regulate COMT catalytic activity and have the impact on its protective effect, mainly the Val108/158Met polymorphism, posing rather inconclusive results1,9,10.
In our previous study, we found a positive association between COMT protein level and cell migration of triple negative MDA-MB-231 cancer cells, as well as connection of COMT protein levels with lymph node metastasis, high grade and poor survival of triple negative breast cancer patients via SWATH-MS proteomics11.
It is evident that previous studies led to inconclusive results regarding the general role of COMT in breast cancer development, suggesting the role being dependent on ER status. Here we study its role in the model of ER dependent breast cancer subtype, luminal A. Using invasion studies in 2D and 3D setting we show that COMT overexpression is connected with lower invasiveness, being supported by RNA-Seq and DIA-based proteomics analysis12 recognizing changes relevant for organization of extracellular matrix, MET signaling, and transcription. In addition, discovery of a novel interaction partners including Kunitz-type protease inhibitor SPINT2, pointed to the novel mechanism of tumor suppressor role of COMT in ER dependent breast cancer through the interplay with MET signaling pathway.
Materials and methods
Cell line preparation and cultivation
The MCF7 breast cancer cell line was purchased from ATCC. MCF7 breast cancer cells were stably transduced with lentiviral vectors (i) pLENTI6.3-RBS-COMT-IRES-EmGFP-GWs expressing COMT (without tag) and green fluorescence protein (GFP) (MCF7-COMT), (ii) pLENTI6.3-EmGFP-GWs expressing GFP as a control (MCF7-GFP), (iii) pLENTI6.3-N-SBP-TEV-COMT-IRES-EmGFP-GWs expressing COMT N-terminally tagged with streptavidin binding peptide and GFP (MCF7-SBP-COMT) and (iv) pLENTI6.3-N-SBP-EmGFP-GWs expressing N-terminal SBP and GFP (MCF7-SBP) as described in Supplementary Methods. The parental MCF7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle´s Medium (DMEM; high glucose) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Merck, Germany) at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere; the stably transduced MCF7 cells were cultured under the same conditions except for adding blasticidin (10 μg/ ml; InvivoGen, USA) to the culture medium after the first passage.
Transwell assay
Cells were cultured in five 6 cm culture dishes per cell line to ~ 80% confluency. Prior to the harvest, the cells were starved in serum-free DMEM medium for 6 h. The cells were then trypsinized, counted, and 100,000 cells were seeded per Transwell well. Invasiveness of the cells was determined by Transwell 96-well plate (Corning Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol in three independent biological experiments. Nine replicates (wells) were used for each condition (with and without FBS) (see Supplementary Fig. S1 for a detailed design of Transwell assay and calibration curves). The top chambers were coated with basement membrane extract (BME, Cultrex® Trevigen, USA) diluted in Coating Buffer (1:50, Trevigen). Invading cells were detected using a fluorescent dye Calcein-AM. The plate was read using a TECAN reader (Tecan Infinite 1000 Pro, Tecan, Switzerland) in fluorescence top reading mode with 16 reads per well and gain set to 100. A standard curve of the dependence of relative fluorescence on cell number was constructed, and percentual invasiveness was calculated from the number of cells which invaded to the bottom chamber of each well divided by the initial number of plated cells (100,000 cells).
3D spheroid cell invasion assay, confocal laser scanning microscopy and image analysis
The cells were cultured in 6 cm culture dishes to ~ 80% confluency in duplicates per condition. Then the cells were trypsinized, counted, and 4000 cells were resuspended in Spheroid formation matrix solution and pelleted in a 96-well Round bottom plate in triplicates for each cell line. Cell invasiveness in 3D setting was analyzed using the Cultrex 96 Well 3D Spheroid BME Cell Invasion Assay (Trevigen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum-supplemented invasion matrix and complete DMEM medium with 5 µM SIR-DNA13 cell dye (Spirochrome, Switzerland) were added to each well 3 days after seeding the cells. Images were acquired using confocal laser scanning microscopy every 24 h. Fresh DMEM medium with 5 µM SIR-DNA was added to each well 3 days after adding invasion matrix to the wells.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy was performed on a Zeiss LSM800 microscope with Plan-Apochromat 5X/0.16 objective. SIR-DNA was excited with 640 nm laser beam and fluorescent emission between 640 and 700 nm was captured on GaAsP-PMT detector. Confocal pinhole was fixed to 1 AU. Transmitted light detector (TL-PMT) was used to acquired overall morphology of spheroids. 3D images of spheroids were generated from Z-stack with fixed slice width and thickness (0.976 µm, 20.970 µm), and analyzed using Imaris 9.7.2 software (Bitplane AG, Oxford Instruments, UK)14. Volumes of spheroids were quantified based on SIR-DNA intensity and standard surface detection. Volume measurements were carried out in triplicates. Three independent experiments were performed.
Protein detection by SDS-PAGE and western blotting
Cell lysates for SDS PAGE were prepared using hot (95 °C) complete sample buffer (14.5% glycerol, 87 mM Tris HCl pH 6.8, 0.006% bromophenol blue in 1 M Tris HCl pH 6.8, 2.9% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 10% mercaptoethanol) and stored at − 20 °C. SDS-PAGE apparatus (Mini-PROTEAN® 3, Bio-Rad, USA) was used with a 5% stacking gel and 10% running gel. 30 µg of protein lysates as determined by an RC-DC Protein Assay (Bio-Rad), and Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standards (Bio-Rad) were run in electrophoretic buffer (25 mM Tris Base, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS) at 30 mA/gel and wet-transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (BioTrace NT, 0.22 μm, Pall Life Sciences, Mexico) in a blotting buffer (20% methanol, 192 mM glycine, 24.8 mM Tris Base) at 100 V for 75 min. Membranes were then cut into pieces according to molecular weight of target protein at corresponding bands of Mw marker and blocked for 1 h in PBS + 0.1% Tween 20 (2.68 mM KCl, 137 mM NaCl, 6.45 mM Na2HPO4*12H2O, 1.47 mM KH2PO4, 0.89 mM Tween 20) containing 5% fat-free dried milk powder (PanReac Applichem, Germany) and incubated with primary antibody at 4 °C overnight. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-COMT (Abcam, UK; ab129504, 1:10,000); mouse anti-actin (Merck; A3853, 1:1000) and anti-SBP (Merck; MAB10764, 1:2000). After incubation, membranes were washed twice in PBS (phosphate buffered saline, 137 mM NaCl; 2.68 mM KCl; 1.47 mM KH2PO4; 10 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.4) and twice in PBS + 0.1% Tween 20 and subsequently incubated with the corresponding secondary antibody (RAMPx, Dako, Denmark; P0161, 1:1000; SWARPx, Dako; P0217, 1:1000) at room temperature for 1 h and washed again. After 5 min of incubation of membranes with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) solution (10 mM luminol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 405 μM coumaric acid, 200 mM Tris pH 9.4, 8 mM sodium perborate tetrahydrate, 50 mM sodium acetate), ECL of immunoreactive proteins were visualized using a CCD camera (Fusion FX 7, Vilber Lourmat, France).
Sample preparation for RNA-Seq analysis
The cells were cultured in 6 cm culture dishes to ~ 80% confluency in duplicates for each cell line. The cells were washed two times with cold PBS on ice, harvested by adding 500 µl of PBS and scraping by a cell scraper, transferred to a microtube and stored on ice. After centrifuging the lysates (1000 g, 5 min, 4 °C,), the supernatant was aspirated and 360 µl of TRI reagent (Merck) was added. Total RNA was isolated according to TRI reagent protocol and its concentration was determined using Qubit RNA BR assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). 240 ng of total RNA at 20 ng/µl was used in RNA-Seq analysis. Samples were stored at − 80 °C.
RNA-Seq analysis and data processing
The TruSeq Stranded Total RNA LT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, USA) was used to convert 0.5 mg of total RNA into a library of template molecules. Library was validated using Bioanalyzer (DNA 1000 Kit, Agilent Technologies, USA) and quantified according to manufacturer instructions by qPCR (KAPA Library Quantification Kit Illumina platforms, Kapa Biosystems, USA) using Quant studio (QuantStudio 5, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were sequenced using NextSeq 500 (Illumina).
For RNA-seq, the raw reads were filtered to remove the adaptors and low-quality bases using Trimmomatic (v0.36) with Truseq2 as well as any reads that were shorter than 65 bases. Filtered reads were aligned to the human genome (Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.dna.primary_assembly) using STAR (v2.5.2b) in end-to-end mode to scan splice junctions. Then the counts in exon genomic features were calculated subread (v1.5.2). Differential expression analysis was performed in R 3.5.3 under the Deseq2 package version 1.22.2. BiomaRt package version 2.38.0. was used for annotation the results from differential expression analysis.
Sample preparation for total proteome analysis
The cells were cultured in 6 cm culture dishes to ~ 80% confluency in triplicates for each cell line. The cells were washed two times with cold PBS on ice and lysed using 200 µl of lysis buffer (6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 100 mM Na-phosphate pH 6.6, 1% Triton X-100). Lysed cells were harvested by a cell scraper, transferred to microtube, and stored on ice. Subsequently, the lysed cells were needle sonicated on ice (50 W, 30 × 0.1 s, 30 s pause, 30 × 0.1 s). After 75-min incubation at room temperature, cell lysates were centrifuged (14,000 g, 20 min, 4 °C) and the supernatant was collected. The protein concentration of cell lysates was determined using RC-DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). Samples were stored at − 80 °C.
Sample preparation for pull-down assay and interactome analysis
The cells were cultured in three 15 cm culture dishes to ~ 80% confluency for each cell line in triplicates. Then they were harvested by a cell scraper, centrifuged (1000 g, 4 °C, 5 min), washed with PBS, and the cell pellets were frozen at − 80 °C. The frozen cell pellet was resuspended with HNN-lysis buffer (0.5% NP40, 200 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM PMSF, 1.2 μM avidin, Complete protease inhibitors without EDTA (Roche, Switzerland)) and subsequently pipetted to dissolve and avoid foaming. The suspension was incubated on ice for 10 min, then transferred to a 2 ml microtube and centrifuged at 14,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. 250 μl of lysis buffer was added to Bio-Rad Spin Column (Bio-Rad, cat. No 732-6008) to avoid the formation of air bubbles. 100 μl of High Capacity Streptavidin Agarose Resin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. No 20359) were mixed in 750 μl of HNN-lysis buffer, and 200 μl of the prepared beads were added to samples which were then incubated for 15 min at 4 °C on a rotary wheel. The beads were then washed twice with 1 ml of HNN-lysis buffer using Bio-Rad Mini Columns. After washing with lysis buffer, samples were washed three times with 1 ml of HNN buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF), which contained no detergent and inhibitors. Finally, samples were eluted with 200 μl of 2.5 mM Biotin in HNN buffer three times.
Protein digestion and peptide purification
Protein digestion in cell lysates was performed on Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) columns (Microcolon filter device, 30 kDa cut-off, Merck). 100 μg of cell lysate was added on the column, the samples were then centrifuged (14,000 g, 30 min, 20 °C). Both steps were repeated until all the volume of the pull-down eluate was applied. 100 μl of 8 M urea in 0.1 M Tris/HCl, pH 8.5, and 20 μl of 100 mM TCEP (tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine) was added on the filter, the proteins were reduced in a thermomixer (600 rpm, 30 min, 37 °C) and centrifuged (14,000 g, 15 min, 20 °C). Then, 100 μl of 8 M urea and 20 μl of 300 mM iodoacetamide were added to the samples. The samples were alkylated in a thermomixer (600 rpm, 1 min, 25 °C), stored without previous stirring in the dark (20 min) and centrifuged (14,000 g, 15 min, 20 °C). 100 μl of 100 mM NH4HCO3 were added on the filter and the sample was centrifuged (14,000 g, 20 min, 20 °C). The previous step was repeated once more. Proteolytic digestion of proteins was initiated by the addition of 100 μl of 50 mM NH4HCO3 and 3.33 μl solution of trypsin (Promega, USA) dissolved in 50 mM acetic acid at 1 μg/μl (trypsin: cleaved protein ratio 1:30). Samples were mixed in a thermomixer (600 rpm, 1 min, 37 °C) and cleaved overnight (37 °C, without shaking). On the next day, the peptides were eluted by centrifugation (14,000 g, 30 min, 20 °C) prior to desalting on MicroSpin C18 columns (The Nest Group, Inc., USA) as previously described15. The eluates were dried in SpeedVac (Thermo Fisher) and stored at − 20 °C.
LC–MS/MS analyses
For the total proteome analysis, the dried peptides were solubilized using 50 µl of 2.5% formic acid (FA) in 50% ACN and 100 µl of pure acetonitrile and concentrated using SpeedVac concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to 20 µl. Finally, the concentrated samples were diluted into LC–MS vials to get peptide concentration of 1 µg/µl with addition of 1 µl of 0.01% polyethylene glycol in water, 1 µl of stock iRT peptides standard (Biognosys, Switzerland), 2 µl of 5% FA and filled into 10 μl by MilliQ water (Merck). Two µg of peptides mixture was injected for each sample.
LC–MS/MS analyses were done using RSLCnano system online connected to Orbitrap Fusion Lumos tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Prior to the LC separation, tryptic digests were online concentrated and desalted using trapping column (100 μm × 30 mm) filled with 3.5 μm X-Bridge BEH 130 C18 sorbent (Waters, USA). After washing of trapping column with 0.1% FA, the peptides were eluted from the trapping column onto analytical Acclaim Pepmap100 C18 column (3 µm particles, 75 μm × 500 mm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) by the following gradient program (mobile phase A: 0.1% FA in water; mobile phase B: 0.1% FA in 80% ACN; flow 300 nl/min): the gradient elution started at 5% of mobile phase B and began to increase in the 5th min to 37% during the 109 min, then reached to 80% of mobile phase B in the next 6 min and remained at this state for the last 10 min. Equilibration of the trapping column and the analytical column was done prior to sample injection to sample loop. The analytical column outlet was directly connected to the Digital PicoView 550 (New Objective, USA) ion source. ABIRD (Active Background Ion Reduction Device, ESI Source Solutions) was installed. MS data were acquired in a data-independent mode (DIA).
Orbitrap analyzer and quadrupole mass filter were employed for survey scan detection (350–1650 m/z). The MS scan resolution was 120,000 (at 200 m/z) with a target value of 2*105 ions and maximum injection time of 100 ms. After the MS scan, defined m/z segments were isolated by quadrupole mass filter and HCD fragmentation was done with a target value of 5*105 ions. MS/MS spectra after HCD fragmentation (default charge state is 2 and 28% collision energy) were recorded in Orbitrap with a resolution of 30,000 (at 200 m/z) in scan range of 200 – 1800 m/z. The maximum injection time for MS/MS was 50 ms.
For the interactome analysis, the dried peptides were analyzed in DIA mode as previously described16 with several modifications as described in Supplementary Methods.
Proteomics data analysis and omics data integration
DIA data were analyzed in Spectronaut software version 13.9 (Biognosys)17 in directDIA mode. UniProt/SwissProt database version 2019_07 downloaded on 2019-09-16 limited to human entries containing 20,431 sequences was used for database search. Carbamidomethylation (C) was used as fixed modification, oxidation (M) and acetylation (protein N-term) were used as variable modifications. q-value at both precursor and protein levels were set to 0.01. Global data normalization was performed, data based on q-value 0.5 percentile (identified in 3 of 6 total runs) were involved in the final dataset. Analysis of differential protein abundance was performed using t-test implemented in Spectronaut17 with false discovery rate correction. Default settings were used for other parameters. Omics data integration analysis was performed in in Bioconductor Mixomics package version 3.14 under R 4.0.5.
Out of all proteins revealed by pull-down assay as interaction partners of COMT (log2FC (control/COMT) > -1 and q-value < 0.05), the true positive interaction partners were selected by filtering the proteins with significantly increased protein levels (log2FC > 0 and q < 0.05) in total proteome analysis out. The resulting true positive protein interaction partners of COMT were displayed by Cytoscape software (version 3.7.2)18.
Gene set enrichment analysis
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) in GSEA Java desktop application (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/downloads.jsp) version 4.2.3 was conducted using the log2 fold change pre-ranked list of all quantified proteins from whole proteome and RNA-seq analyses (COMT vs. control) to identify enriched pathways. All the analyses were conducted using a priori defined pathways from Reactome database version 7.5.1 (ftp.broadinstitute.org://pub/gsea/gene_sets/c2.cp.reactome.v7.5.1.symbols.gmt). No chip platform was selected, otherwise default settings were used. Furthermore, log2 fold change pre-ranked list of all interaction partners of COMT insignificantly over- or lower-expressed in the whole proteome data was used to identify positively enriched pathways in pull-down data. Another GSEA analysis of COMT interaction partners with the same data with addition of COMT was carried out to remove interaction partners that are part of the same pathways as COMT. Minimal size of a gene set was adjusted to 1 and no chip platform was selected, otherwise default settings were used. Pathways with nominal p-value < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. To visualize the overlap among enriched pathway in transcriptomic and proteomic data as an network, we used EnrichmentMap19 app in Cytoscape software (3.7.2). Node cutoff was adjusted to 0.1 of FDR q-value and for edge cutoff was selected combined Jaccard and Overlap metric at 0.375.
Statistical analysis of cellular studies in vitro
The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with the Sidak’s multiple comparisons test in Prism 8.4.0 (GraphPad Software, USA)20, the differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Data are presented as medians with box extended from the 25th to the 75th percentile and whiskers representing minimal and maximal value in the dataset in the cumulative graphs based on three independent biological experiments in main article and individual graphs representing biological replicates in Supplementary Information.
Results
COMT overexpression decreases invasiveness of MCF7 cells in 2D and 3D setting
To study the role of COMT in metastatic potential of ER dependent BC at cellular level, we examined how COMT overexpression affects cell invasiveness of MCF7 cells originally derived from luminal A breast tumor. We generated a new stably transduced MCF7 cell line overexpressing COMT (MCF7-COMT) and compared its invasiveness with that of parental MCF7 cells in 2D setting using Transwell invasion assay (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. S2). Although MCF7 cells generally do not exhibit highly invasive phenotype, three independent biological experiments showed that MCF7-COMT cells exhibit significantly lower invasiveness than parental MCF7 cell line (p < 0.0001; Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. S3).
To confirm this observation in 3D setting, we studied the effect of COMT overexpression on the invasiveness of MCF7 cells using a spheroid cell invasion assay. The 3D experiment confirmed decreased invasiveness of MCF7-COMT cells compared to control MCF7-GFP cells: cells did not invade into the surrounding invasion matrix (Fig. 2A,B, Supplementary Figs. S4, S5, Supplementary Data S1) and, in addition, spheroids formed by MCF7-COMT cells increased their volume significantly slower than control cells (p < 0.05; Fig. 2C).
Overall, COMT overexpression in MCF7 cells reduced cell invasiveness in comparison with both parental and mock cells in 2D and 3D settings, indicating anti-invasion role of COMT in ER dependent breast cancer.
COMT overexpression modulates gene products associated with cell migration and adhesion and interplays with MET pathway
To understand the molecular background of COMT role in MCF7 cells, we analyzed stably transduced MCF7-COMT cells compared to control mock MCF7-GFP cells using RNA-Seq and proteomics based on LC-DIA-MS/MS. In total, 15,996 protein coding transcripts were quantified in RNA-Seq analysis (Supplementary Data S2) and 3465 protein groups represented by 28,681 peptides and 37,556 precursors were quantified in total proteome analysis (Supplementary Data S3). Of these, 3299 proteins groups matched their encoding genes in the human genome database used for RNA-Seq data analysis (Supplementary Data S4).
Out of 3299 genes and proteins identified in our data, 19 genes and 74 proteins were significantly deregulated in transcriptomics (|log2FC|> 1, adj. p-val < 0.05) and proteomics (|log2FC|> 0.58, adj. p-val < 0.05), respectively. COMT was the most significantly overexpressed gene in MCF7-COMT cells compared to control cells at both transcript and protein level, confirming the validity of the experiments. Other groups of deregulated gene products involved those associated with detoxification, cell adhesion and migration, cell cycle and proliferation, transcription regulation, transport, immune system and metabolism (Fig. 3).
In addition to COMT, three gene products were significantly deregulated on both transcript and protein levels. From these, sideroflexin-2 (SFXN2) is an evolutionary conserved protein involved in mitochondrial iron metabolism by regulating heme biosynthesis21. SFXN2 was later observed as an prognostic factor in renal, urothelial, cervical, and liver cancer and its high expression was associated with a significantly longer overall survival probability in the PANCAN cohort with more than 12,800 samples derived from 17 different tumors22. Furthermore, LCP1 gene product representing plastin-2/L-plastin protein was downregulated in MCF7-COMT cells; this protein was observed to accompany tumorigenesis in malignant cells and was connected to cell migration and metastasis23. These genes were selected from combined omics analysis based on three biological replicates in proteomics and two biological replicates in transcriptomics and remained unchanged when additional two biological replicates were implemented into transcriptomics analysis (Supplementary Data S5). These data on the key gene products co-regulated with COMT indicate that COMT overexpression might lead to upregulation of tumor suppressing and downregulation of pro-tumorigenic gene products.
GSEA pathway analysis of RNA-Seq and proteomics data was carried out to further recognize the changes in biological processes associated with COMT overexpression in MCF7 cells. 184 and 78 enriched pathways were identified at p < 0.05 (Supplementary Data S6) in RNA-Seq and proteomics datasets, respectively. The overlaps among enriched pathways on transcript and protein levels were visualized as a Cytoscape network of single biological theme clusters (Fig. 4). Largest clusters correspond to gene transcription (negative enrichment) and extracellular matrix (ECM) organization (positive enrichment in COMT overexpressing cells). The latter well supports the results of invasion assays (Figs. 1, 2) as the interaction with ECM components is a key factor of the ability of cells to invade. ECM organization cluster was directly connected to MET signaling in the visualized network (Fig. 4). This is important as MET pathway, including MET receptor and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), has a key role in cancer cell migration and metastasis and is an established target of breast cancer therapy. We were thus interested how the individual gene products of this pathway were regulated in response to COMT overexpression (Table 1). First, collagens alpha-2 (COL1A2) and alpha-1 (COL3A1) were the most upregulated gene products. The corresponding proteins serve as structural constituents of extracellular matrix24, supporting the interaction of cancer cells with ECM. On the other hand, hepatocyte growth factor activator (HGFAC) was the most downregulated protein in COMT overexpressing cells (Table 1)25. HGFAC, a MET ligand, is essential factor for the activation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)26. These data indicate an interplay between COMT overexpression and suppression of MET signaling.
Having big omics datasets for COMT-related network in our hands, we were interested whether these RNA-Seq and/or proteomics data can be used to simply distinguish the COMT + and COMT− cells based on their transcriptome and/or proteome profile. As single omics analysis usually does not provide enough information to give a deep understanding of a biological system, we integrated both RNA-Seq and proteomics datasets and subjected them to multivariate analysis. Correlation analysis of both omics’ datasets led to identification of top 50 transcripts and top 50 proteins that were highly correlated. Based on these, we were able to differentiate the sample subgroups in response to COMT overexpression (Fig. 5A). Accordingly, samples of MCF7-COMT and MCF7-GFP cells each clustered together based on the expression of the most correlated transcripts and proteins (Fig. 5B). Even though the integration of the data should display a broader view of samples and enrich our results with a deeper biological context, variance analysis based on the RNA-Seq and proteomics data also showed that the effect of COMT overexpression on MCF7 cells could be distinguished solely using transcriptomics, or proteomics dataset (Supplementary Fig. S6). These results confirm that both datasets are sources of a valuable and relevant information for future studies on COMT functional network.
MET interactor SPINT2 is a key interaction partner of COMT
As not only the co-expression, but also a physical interaction between proteins indicates their functional collaboration, we generated additional stably transduced cell line overexpressing COMT N-terminally tagged with streptavidin binding peptide (SBP) (MCF7-SBP-COMT) as well as the control line expressing SBP only (MCF7-SBP; see Fig. S7 for input levels of COMT and SBP into pull-down assay). Pull-down assay followed by LC-DIA-MS/MS was applied to identify protein–protein interactions of COMT. Of total 388 proteins identified and quantified (Supplementary Data S7), 48 were more abundant (log2FC > 1, q < 0.05) in pull-down assays in the presence of COMT, being its potential interaction partners. Subsequently, proteins more abundant (log2FC > 0, q < 0.05) also in MCF7-COMT vs. MCF7-GFP total cell proteome were filtered out from this list to exclude changes caused by expression and not the interaction. 32 proteins met these criteria being considered the “true” interaction partners of COMT (Fig. 6). While Ras-related proteins RAB14 and RAB5A, calnexin (CANX) and extended synaptotagmin-1 (ESYT1) have been listed as known COMT interactors in BioGRID27, HIPPIE28, MENTHA29 and PINA30 databases, the rest of the “true” interactors are new. To categorize these true interactors into REACTOME pathways, we performed GSEA that resulted in three statistically significantly positively enriched pathways (NOM p-value < 0.05; Table 2). As a result, the only “true” interactor that was involved in two of three identified pathways, MET RECEPTOR ACTIVATION and SIGNALING BY MST1 (Table 2) which also had the highest log2FC in pull-down assay but no significantly different abundance between MCF7-COMT vs. MCF7-GFP cells (Fig. 6), was SPINT2, a protease inhibitor known for a negative regulation of hepatocyte growth factor-induced invasion in BC cells26. This finding complements an information on interplay between COMT and MET signaling observed in RNA-Seq and proteomics experiments. The third pathway, SIGNALING BY NUCLEAR RECEPTORS pathway is involved in transcription regulation. Among the proteins involved in this pathway, GNAI3 was found responsible for inhibition of cell invasion and tumor progression in hepatocellular31 and colitis-associated carcinoma32, whereas SCD33 and CPT1A34,35 are involved in tumor progression and cell motility. In conclusion, pathway analysis of pull-down assay data revealed novel interesting interactors of COMT corresponding to the same functional groups as RNA-Seq and proteomics analysis (MET pathway and transcription regulation) that might cooperate in COMT activity, including its tumor suppressor role in MCF7 cells.
Discussion
Catechol-O-methyl transferase is the enzyme required for inactivation of carcinogenic catechol estrogens, playing a tumor protective role in ER dependent cells1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. In breast cancer cells, Tolba et al. showed that silencing of COMT enhanced cell proliferation of MCF7, however, the opposed was observed in cells that lack ER-α expression as MDA-MB-23136. Accordingly, Faktor et al. found COMT to be positively associated with migration of MDA-MB-231 cell line using SILAC proteomics11. Our data presented here well complement all these findings by the observation that COMT overexpression in MCF7 cells leads to decreased invasiveness of ER dependent MCF7 cells originally derived from luminal A breast tumor.
Our current study of the COMT effect on invasiveness and tumorigenesis on molecular level led to the gain of transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of MCF7-COMT and control cells. Network constructed of significantly enriched pathways based on these data (Fig. 4) showed deregulation of MET signaling pathways due to COMT overexpression. Signaling leading to interaction between hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and MET receptor is known to contribute to metastasis development37. HGF is involved in tumor cell–cell interactions, matrix adhesion, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis38 and together with MET represent an important target for cancer therapy. We identified several deregulated proteins involved in MET signaling in the proteomic data. Serine/threonine-protein kinase PAK1 involved in MET signaling activation via inhibition of merlin39 and ubiquitin-specific protease 8 (USP8) regulating MET levels and stability40,41 were significantly overexpressed (Table 1). However, almost 1.4-fold lower expression of HGF activator (HGFAC) required for proteolytic activation of HGF inactive precursor and its conversion to heterodimer along with slight overexpression of negative regulator of MET signaling25, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTPN1), were observed after COMT overexpression in our data. Newly found interplay between the MET signaling and COMT expression might pose as additional element participating in inhibition of tumorigenesis mediated by COMT. Another contributing factor to the connection between COMT and MET signaling might be its novel interacting partner Kunitz-type protease inhibitor 2(SPINT2) found in our pull-down data. SPINT2 serves as inhibitor of HGFAC which is, as previously mentioned, necessary for cleaving the pro-HGF and subsequent binding of active HGF to its receptor MET38.
Considering the function of SPINT2, its role as tumor suppressor was reported in several malignancies such as breast cancer38,42, prostate cancer43,44, renal cell carcinoma45,46,47, brain cancer48,49,50,51 and others52,53. SPINT2 has been found to be associated with COMT in in silico analysis so far only indirectly through epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) family using STRING database (Fig. 7) and amyloid-beta precursor protein (APP) in BioGRID database. Even though the connection between SPINT2, EPCAM and ALDH3B2 is based on their co-expression in the database, Kawaguchi et al. experimentally proved that SPINT2 stabilizes EPCAM-claudin-7 complex which prevents enhanced epithelial permeability54. The connection between COMT and ALDH family is based on their known joint participation in detoxification pathways55. Yet another identified indirect interaction between COMT and SPINT2 was mediated via APP, protein associated with occurrence of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease56. Study of these disorders led to recognition of COMT and SPINT2 as interacting partners of APP by quantitative interaction proteomics57 and protein array-based interactome screen58, respectively. Thus, the newly discovered direct interplay between these two proteins could define new mechanism of COMT tumor suppressor activity.
Moreover, the overlap of quantified data from transcriptomic and proteomic analyses showed positive enrichment of pathways involved in ECM organization in MCF7 cells overexpressing COMT. Observed changes in pathways related to collagen organization and turnover, anchoring fibril formation, and syndecan, integrin and non-integrin ECM interactions (Supplementary Data S6) might also be instrumental to demonstrate the anti-invasive effect of COMT on ER + breast cancer cells. Positive enrichment of these pathways is represented by several proteins involved in matrix turnover such as secreted (MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-12) and membrane-type (MMP-14) matrix metalloproteinases impacting matrix integrity by degrading matrix constituents59, metalloproteinase inhibitor 160, N-proteinases ADAMTS-2, ADAMTS-3, ADAMTS-9, ADAMTS-14 and ADAMTS-16 degrading procollagen types I, II and III61, cathepsin S cleaving matrix precursors intracellularly60, tolloid-like protein 2 proteinase cleaving the carboxy terminus of pro-collagen to release mature collagen molecules60, and serpins E1 and H1 serving as inhibitors of matrix turnover by inhibiting serin and cysteine proteases and controlling the collagen turnover by regulating the activity of other degrading enzymes60. In addition, the cluster of ECM organization related pathways is associated with collagen fibril organization and cell adhesion represented by lysyl oxidase family member LOXL1 stabilizing the mature collagen fibrils and elastin60, lysyl hydroxylase family member PLOD2 involved in crosslinking the collagen fibrils62, and several matrix constituents60. These include proteoglycan versican, glycoproteins tenascin C, laminin subunit beta-3 forming basal lamina60, intracellular adhesion molecule 4 regulating cell adhesion and assembly of other matrix molecules63, and sialo-glycoprotein vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 serving pivotal role in the adhesion of cells to the vascular endothelium64. Deregulation of ECM organization in our data might conduce the anti-invasive impact of COMT on ER + BC cells.
According to the results of pathway analysis based on transcriptomics and proteomics, the most negatively enriched pathways are associated with transcription regulation (Supplementary Data S6). Proteins contributing to the enrichment of these pathways are important regulators of the cell cycle, particularly cyclin-dependent kinase 1 initiating the mitotic progression65, CDKN2A also known as p16 acting as tumor suppressor through inhibition of cell cycle66, and cell cycle marker proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) also involved in DNA replication and repair67. These changes in transcriptomic and proteomic profiles after COMT overexpression indicate the possible mechanism behind decreased invasiveness due to upregulation of COMT in MCF7 cells arising from the molecular changes in ECM organization and down-regulation of cell cycle.
Efforts to understand the tumor suppressor role of COMT in cancer cells in hormone receptor positive tumors were previously recorded: Estrogen (17β-estradiol) decreases the mRNA levels of COMT in time- and dose-dependent manner mediated by estrogen responsive elements in its proximal promoter and CCAAT/enhancer binding sites in its distal promoter68,69. Subsequently, the epigenetic mechanism of estrogen-induced COMT downregulation by CpG site-specific methylation within its distal promoter was also determined70. The negative effect of estrogen on COMT expression and its impact on the inhibition of tumorigenesis was observed on ER + breast cancer cell line36, as well as reduced expression of COMT in ER + breast tumor samples11. Based on such evidence, beneficial effects of anti-estrogen therapy (e.g. with tamoxifen) in ER + BC patients may include also increased protein levels and activity of COMT, however, this assumption requires further confirmation and evaluation, also because the knowledge on ER binding to COMT promoter remains unclear71,72,73. In our previous study11 we found association of increased COMT protein levels with lymph node metastasis of triple negative breast tumors. COMT may thus hypothetically represent a potential therapeutic target for triple negative breast cancer. In the present study we describe the tumor-suppressor role of COMT in luminal A breast cancer, these all in accordance with findings by Tolba et al. at cellular level34. From the translational perspective, these findings highlight the need of personalized therapy of BC patients.
As of the limitations of the study, our results are based on a single cellular model of luminal A BC subtype overexpressing COMT in hormonally independent expression system. The future experiments should validate our conclusions in other cell lines in vitro, or as cell line derived xenograft mice models in vivo. An impact of hormones and hormonal receptors on COMT expression and function in BC cells also requires more detailed analyses. Last but not least, our results open an opportunity for interesting validation and more detailed functional studies on the COMT-SPINT2 crosstalk and its role in breast cancer phenotype.
In conclusion, cell invasion assays, RNA-Seq and proteomics data resulted in identification of anti-tumorigenic role of COMT represented by decreased cell invasion, positive and negative enrichment of pathways involved in ECM organization and regulation of transcription, respectively. COMT might act as an anti-invasive agent on ER + breast cancer also through its newly discovered interplay with MET signaling via its interacting partner, SPINT2, leading to the inhibition of this pro-tumorigenic pathway. Therefore, we confirm the predicted tumor suppressor role of COMT in luminal breast cancer in spite of opposite recognized effect of COMT in estrogen-independent MDA-MB-231 line associated with cell migration and metastasis in our previous study11.
Data availability
The raw mass spectrometry proteomics data and output files for the total proteome and pull-down analyses have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the Proteomics Identifications (PRIDE) partner repository (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/) with the dataset identifier PXD033833. The raw and processed RNA-Seq data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus74 and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE203435 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE203435).
References
Lavigne, J. A. et al. An association between the allele coding for a low activity variant of catechol-O-methyltransferase and the risk for breast cancer. Cancer Res. 57, 5493–5497 (1997).
Lundström, K. et al. Cloning, expression and structure of catechol-O-methyltransferase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1251, 1–10 (1995).
Li, K., Li, W. & Zou, H. Catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism and breast cancer risk in Asian population. Tumor Biol. 35, 2343–2350 (2014).
Williams-Brown, M. Y. et al. The effect of tamoxifen and raloxifene on estrogen metabolism and endometrial cancer risk. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 126, 78–86 (2011).
Yager, J. D. & Liehr, J. G. Molecular mechanisms of estrogen carcinogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 36, 203–232 (1996).
Cohen, G. M. & d’Arcy Doherty, M. Free radical mediated cell toxicity by redox cycling chemicals. Br. J. Cancer. Suppl. 8, 46–52 (1987).
Tan, X. & Chen, M. Association between Catechol-O-methyltransferase rs4680 (G>A) polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Diagn. Pathol. 9, 192 (2014).
Hevir, N., Šinkovec, J. & Rižner, T. L. Disturbed expression of phase I and phase II estrogen-metabolizing enzymes in endometrial cancer: Lower levels of CYP1B1 and increased expression of S-COMT. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 331, 158–167 (2011).
Yager, J. D. Catechol-O-methyltransferase: Characteristics, polymorphisms and role in breast cancer. Drug Discov. Today Dis. Mech. 9, e41–e46 (2012).
Peterson, N. B. et al. Association of COMT haplotypes and breast cancer risk in caucasian women. Anticancer Res. 30, 217–220 (2010).
Faktor, J. et al. Proteomics identification and validation of desmocollin-1 and catechol-O-methyltransferase as proteins associated with breast cancer cell migration and metastasis. Proteomics 19, e1900073 (2019).
Faktor, J., Sucha, R., Paralova, V., Liu, Y. & Bouchal, P. Comparison of targeted proteomics approaches for detecting and quantifying proteins derived from human cancer tissues. Proteomics 17, 1600323 (2017).
Lukinavičius, G. et al. SiR-Hoechst is a far-red DNA stain for live-cell nanoscopy. Nat. Commun. 6, 8497 (2015).
Imaris software. https://imaris.oxinst.com/
Bouchalova, P. et al. Transgelin contributes to a poor response of metastatic renal cell carcinoma to Sunitinib treatment. Biomedicines 9, 1145 (2021).
Bouchal, P. et al. Breast cancer classification based on proteotypes obtained by SWATH mass spectrometry. Cell Rep. 28, 832-843.e7 (2019).
Spectronaut software. https://biognosys.com/software/spectronaut/
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
Merico, D., Isserlin, R., Stueker, O., Emili, A. & Bader, G. D. Enrichment map: A network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS ONE 5, e13984 (2010).
GraphPad software. https://www.graphpad.com/
Mon, E. E. et al. Regulation of mitochondrial iron homeostasis by sideroflexin 2. J. Physiol. Sci. JPS 69, 359–373 (2019).
Edemir, B. Identification of prognostic organic cation and anion transporters in different cancer entities by in silico analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, E4491 (2020).
Shinomiya, H. Plastin family of actin-bundling proteins: Its functions in leukocytes, neurons, intestines, and cancer. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 1–8 (2012).
Zhang, H. et al. Extracellular matrix-related genes play an important role in the progression of NMIBC to MIBC: A bioinformatics analysis study. Biosci. Rep. 40, BSR20194192 (2020).
Sangwan, V. et al. Regulation of the Met receptor-tyrosine kinase by the protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B and T-cell phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 34374–34383 (2008).
Parr, C. & Jiang, W. G. Hepatocyte growth factor activation inhibitors (HAI-1 and HAI-2) regulate HGF-induced invasion of human breast cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 119, 1176–1183 (2006).
Oughtred, R. et al. The BioGRID database: A comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions. Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc. 30, 187–200 (2021).
Schaefer, M. H. et al. HIPPIE: Integrating protein interaction networks with experiment based quality scores. PLoS ONE 7, e31826 (2012).
Calderone, A., Castagnoli, L. & Cesareni, G. mentha: A resource for browsing integrated protein-interaction networks. Nat. Methods 10, 690–691 (2013).
Wu, J. et al. Integrated network analysis platform for protein-protein interactions. Nat. Methods 6, 75–77 (2009).
Zhang, Y. et al. GNAI3 inhibits tumor cell migration and invasion and is post-transcriptionally regulated by miR-222 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 356, 978–984 (2015).
Li, Z.-W. et al. GNAI1 and GNAI3 reduce colitis-associated tumorigenesis in mice by blocking IL6 signaling and down-regulating expression of GNAI2. Gastroenterology 156, 2297–2312 (2019).
Lingrand, M. et al. SCD1 activity promotes cell migration via a PLD-mTOR pathway in the MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cell line. Breast Cancer Tokyo Jpn. 27, 594–606 (2020).
Pucci, S. et al. Carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1A (CPT1A): A new tumor specific target in human breast cancer. Oncotarget 7, 19982–19996 (2016).
Xiong, Y. et al. CPT1A regulates breast cancer-associated lymphangiogenesis via VEGF signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. Biomedecine Pharmacother. 106, 1–7 (2018).
Tolba, M. F., Omar, H. A., Hersi, F., Nunes, A. C. F. & Noreddin, A. M. The impact of Catechol-O-methyl transferase knockdown on the cell proliferation of hormone-responsive cancers. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 488, 79–88 (2019).
Lau, D. et al. Role of c-Met/β1 integrin complex in the metastatic cascade in breast cancer. JCI Insight 6, 138928 (2021).
Parr, C., Watkins, G., Mansel, R. E. & Jiang, W. G. The hepatocyte growth factor regulatory factors in human breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 10, 202–211 (2004).
Shrestha, Y. et al. PAK1 is a breast cancer oncogene that coordinately activates MAPK and MET signaling. Oncogene 31, 3397–3408 (2012).
Niendorf, S. et al. Essential role of ubiquitin-specific protease 8 for receptor tyrosine kinase stability and endocytic trafficking in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 5029–5039 (2007).
Duan, B., Wang, C., Liu, Z. & Yang, X. USP8 is a novel therapeutic target in melanoma through regulating receptor tyrosine kinase levels. Cancer Manag. Res. 13, 4181–4189 (2021).
Parr, C. & Jiang, W. G. Expression of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, its activator, inhibitors and the c-Met receptor in human cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 19, 857–863 (2001).
Solís-Calero, C. & Carvalho, H. F. KLK14 interactions with HAI-1 and HAI-2 serine protease inhibitors: A molecular dynamics and relative free-energy calculations study. Cell Biol. Int. 41, 1246–1264 (2017).
Kirchhofer, D. et al. Hepsin activates pro-hepatocyte growth factor and is inhibited by hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor-1B (HAI-1B) and HAI-2. FEBS Lett. 579, 1945–1950 (2005).
Betsunoh, H. et al. Clinical relevance of hepsin and hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 2 expression in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 98, 491–498 (2007).
Morris, M. R. et al. Tumor suppressor activity and epigenetic inactivation of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 2/SPINT2 in papillary and clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 65, 4598–4606 (2005).
Yamauchi, M. et al. Hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor types 1 and 2 are expressed by tubular epithelium in kidney and down-regulated in renal cell carcinoma. J. Urol. 171, 890–896 (2004).
Pereira, M. S. et al. Loss of SPINT2 expression frequently occurs in glioma, leading to increased growth and invasion via MMP2. Cell. Oncol. Dordr. 43, 107–121 (2020).
Liu, F. et al. SPINT2 is hypermethylated in both IDH1 mutated and wild-type glioblastomas, and exerts tumor suppression via reduction of c-Met activation. J. Neurooncol. 142, 423–434 (2019).
Fukushima, T. et al. Aberrant methylation and silencing of the SPINT2 gene in high-grade gliomas. Cancer Sci. 109, 2970–2979 (2018).
Kongkham, P. N. et al. An epigenetic genome-wide screen identifies SPINT2 as a novel tumor suppressor gene in pediatric medulloblastoma. Cancer Res. 68, 9945–9953 (2008).
Hwang, S. et al. Epigenetic silencing of SPINT2 promotes cancer cell motility via HGF-MET pathway activation in melanoma. J. Invest. Dermatol. 135, 2283–2291 (2015).
Qu, Y., Dang, S. & Hou, P. Gene methylation in gastric cancer. Clin. Chim. Acta Int. J. Clin. Chem. 424, 53–65 (2013).
Kawaguchi, M. et al. Hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor-2 stabilizes Epcam and maintains epithelial organization in the mouse intestine. Commun. Biol. 2, 11 (2019).
Marchitti, S. A., Orlicky, D. J. & Vasiliou, V. Expression and initial characterization of human ALDH3B1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 356, 792–798 (2007).
Chung, S. et al. Plexin-A4 mediates amyloid-β-induced tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease animal model. Prog. Neurobiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102075 (2021).
Hosp, F. et al. Quantitative interaction proteomics of neurodegenerative disease proteins. Cell Rep. 11, 1134–1146 (2015).
Oláh, J. et al. Interactions of pathological hallmark proteins: Tubulin polymerization promoting protein/p25, beta-amyloid, and alpha-synuclein. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 34088–34100 (2011).
Rowe, R. G. & Weiss, S. J. Breaching the basement membrane: Who, when and how?. Trends Cell Biol. 18, 560–574 (2008).
Cox, T. R. The matrix in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 217–238 (2021).
Porter, S., Clark, I. M., Kevorkian, L. & Edwards, D. R. The ADAMTS metalloproteinases. Biochem. J. 386, 15–27 (2005).
Gilkes, D. M. et al. Procollagen lysyl hydroxylase 2 is essential for hypoxia-induced breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 11, 456–466 (2013).
Rosette, C. et al. Role of ICAM1 in invasion of human breast cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 26, 943–950 (2005).
Sharma, R. et al. Breast cancer metastasis: Putative therapeutic role of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Cell. Oncol. Dordr. 40, 199–208 (2017).
Asghar, U., Witkiewicz, A. K., Turner, N. C. & Knudsen, E. S. The history and future of targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 130–146 (2015).
Kashyap, D., Garg, V. K., Sandberg, E. N., Goel, N. & Bishayee, A. Oncogenic and tumor suppressive components of the cell cycle in breast cancer progression and prognosis. Pharmaceutics 13, 569 (2021).
Juríková, M., Danihel, Ľ, Polák, Š & Varga, I. Ki67, PCNA, and MCM proteins: Markers of proliferation in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acta Histochem. 118, 544–552 (2016).
Wang, R. et al. Role of β-estradiol in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line based on the bioinformatics analysis. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 84, 268–276 (2019).
Xie, T., Ho, S. L. & Ramsden, D. Characterization and implications of estrogenic down-regulation of human catechol-O-methyltransferase gene transcription. Mol. Pharmacol. 56, 31–38 (1999).
Wu, Q., Odwin-Dacosta, S., Cao, S., Yager, J. D. & Tang, W.-Y. Estrogen down regulates COMT transcription via promoter DNA methylation in human breast cancer cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 367, 12–22 (2019).
Zou, Z., Ohta, T., Miura, F. & Oki, S. ChIP-Atlas 2021 update: A data-mining suite for exploring epigenomic landscapes by fully integrating ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq and Bisulfite-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W175-182 (2022).
Oki, S. et al. ChIP-Atlas: A data-mining suite powered by full integration of public ChIP-seq data. EMBO Rep. 19, e46255 (2018).
Oki, S; Ohta, T (2015): ChIP-Atlas. https://chip-atlas.org
Edgar, R., Domrachev, M. & Lash, A. E. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 207–210 (2002).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Jakub Faktor (Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute) for the measurement of pull-down samples and Dr. Eva Budinska (RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University) for introducing LJ into mixOmics analysis. This work was supported by Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant nr. NU22-08-00230, all rights reserved. CIISB, Instruct-CZ Centre of Instruct-ERIC EU consortium, funded by MEYS CR infrastructure projects LM2018127 and CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/18_046/0015974, is gratefully acknowledged for the financial support of the measurements at the CEITEC Proteomics Core Facility (by DP). Bioinformatics Core Facility of CEITEC Masaryk University supported by the NCMG research infrastructure (LM2018132 funded by MEYS CR) is acknowledged for RNA-Seq data analysis. CELLIM core facility supported by the Czech-BioImaging large RI project (LM2018129 funded by MEYS CR) is acknowledged for their support with obtaining 3D culture images (by LJ). Supported by the project National Institute for Cancer Research (Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5102)—Funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.J. grew the cells, performed the invasion experiments, processed, interpreted and visualized the data and drafted the manuscript. M.S. prepared the stably transduced cell line. P.L. processed proteomics and pull-down samples. S.H. performed immunoblotting. P.B. processed samples for transcriptomics analysis. D.P. measured the total proteome samples using LC–MS/MS. R.H. performed RNA-Seq analysis and data processing. P.M. designed the stably transduced cell lines. PBouchal designed and supervised the project, secured the funding, interpreted the results, and finalized the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Janacova, L., Stenckova, M., Lapcik, P. et al. Catechol-O-methyl transferase suppresses cell invasion and interplays with MET signaling in estrogen dependent breast cancer. Sci Rep 13, 1285 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28078-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28078-1
This article is cited by
-
Integrated multiplexed assays of variant effect reveal determinants of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene expression
Molecular Systems Biology (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.