Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21821-0, published online 03 November 2022
The original version of this Article contained errors in Tables 2 and 3.
In Table 2, values for Wald chi2, AIC/BIC, Pseudo R2, Alpha 95%CI in the “Independent variables” section were incorrectly given in columns Model 1: M, Model 1: SE, and Model 2: M, instead of in columns Model 1, Model 2 and Model 3. The correct and incorrect values appear below.
Incorrect:
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | SE | M | SE | M | SE | |
Independent variables | ||||||
Wald chi2 | 267.85*** | 283.70*** | 295.44*** | |||
AIC/BIC | 18420.86/18479.58 | 18418.83/18482.89 | 18410.12/18479.52 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.025 | |||
Alpha 95%CI | [0.941, 1.086] | [0.939, 1.084] | [0.934, 1.078] | |||
Correct:
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | SE | M | SE | M | SE | |
Independent variables | ||||||
Wald chi2 | 267.85*** | 283.70*** | 295.44*** | |||
AIC/BIC | 18420.86/18479.58 | 18418.83/18482.89 | 18410.12/18479.52 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.025 | |||
Alpha 95%CI | [0.941, 1.086] | [0.939, 1.084] | [0.934, 1.078] | |||
In Table 3, values for AIC/BIC, R2, and Root MSE in the “Independent variables” section were incorrectly given in columns Model 1: β, Model 1: SE, and Model 2: β, instead of in columns Model 1, Model 2 and Model 3. The correct and incorrect values appear below.
Incorrect:
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ß | SE | ß | SE | ß | SE | |
Independent variables | ||||||
AIC/BIC | 5782.29/5835.68 | 5782.253/5840.98 | 5769.82/5833.89 | |||
R2 | 0.202 | 0.203 | 0.211 | |||
Root MSE | 1.578 | 1.578 | 1.571 | |||
Correct:
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ß | SE | ß | SE | ß | SE | |
Independent variables | ||||||
AIC/BIC | 5782.29/5835.68 | 5782.253/5840.98 | 5769.82/5833.89 | |||
R2 | 0.202 | 0.203 | 0.211 | |||
Root MSE | 1.578 | 1.578 | 1.571 | |||
The original Article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, G., Gan, Y. & Yang, H. Author Correction: The inverted U-shaped relationship between knowledge diversity of researchers and societal impact. Sci Rep 12, 20851 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25513-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25513-7
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
