Oncotherapeutics research is progressing at a rapid pace, however, not many drugs complete the successful clinical trial because of severe off-target toxicity to cardiomyocytes which ultimately leads to cardiac dysfunction. It is thus important to emphasize the need for early testing for possible cardiotoxicity of emerging oncotherapeutics. In this study, we assessed a novel stem cell-derived cardiac model for testing for cardiotoxicity of novel oncotherapeutics. We evaluated the cardiotoxic effect of synthesized derivatives of oncotherapeutics, quercetin (QMJ-2, -5, and -6) and cinnamic acid (NMJ-1, -2, and -3) using human Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes (WJCM) against known cardiotoxic oncologic drugs, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin. QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 were not cardiotoxic and had minimum cardiac side effects. They did not show any effect on cardiomyocyte viability, caused low LDH release, and intracellular ROS production kept the calcium flux minimal and protected the active mitochondrial status in cardiomyocytes. They persevered cardiac-specific gene expression as well. However, compounds QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 were cardiotoxic and the concentration needs to be reduced to prevent toxic effects on cardiomyocytes. Significantly, we were able to demonstrate that WJCM is an efficient cardiac testing model to analyze the cardiotoxicity of drugs in a human context.
Cancer is a multifactorial disease1 and due to tremendous advancement in treatment modalities such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, mortality has declined followed by improvement in survivorship2. However, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have emerged as major side effects among cancer survivors that may lead to long-term morbidity and premature deaths3. This is related to the outcome of cardiotoxicity resulting directly from the cancer treatment and that could have compromised the cardiac function and structure4.
Over time, a large number of the anti-cancer drug has been withdrawn from the market and the reason was an unintended effect on cardiac health3. The anthracycline class of chemotherapeutic drugs which consists of doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, cisplatin, idarubicin, epirubicin, and mitoxantrone are known for exerting an adverse cardiotoxic effect on cardiomyocytes5. In 2016, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) suggested a prior check to identify the risk of developing cardiovascular toxicity by any cancer treatments and therapy. Treatment modifications can thus be practiced that may allow decreasing the risk for further cardiotoxicity before administration to the patients6.
In search of a new therapeutic agent, chemically synthesized compounds whose structures mostly are inspired by natural compounds have been explored enormously against various disease models7. Bringing any newly synthesized anti-cancer molecule even after extensive preclinical testing, the entity faces several challenges to get translated for clinical utility because of their potential to cause cardiotoxicity8.
The heart comprises cardiac fibroblast cells, cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells, and among them, cardiomyocytes are the main cells that carry out the vital function of pumping9. If an agent can induce cardiotoxicity, then it acts directly on cardiomyocytes, eventually leading to cardiomyocytes' death. There are potential moieties that include disruption of mitochondrial potential, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, reduction in intracellular calcium level, and effect on signaling molecule, Nitric oxide (NO) level resulting in an adverse effect on cardiomyocytes. Simultaneously, cardiotoxicity reduces the metabolic activities and cardiac markers expression in cardiomyocytes10,11. Meanwhile, reliable cardiotoxicity testing models in vitro in the human context are lacking.
Traditionally, animal models have been used to evaluate the drug cardiotoxicity, which tends to be costlier and due to interspecies differences, the outcome remains uncertain12. With time, ethical concerns associated with the use of animals is getting bigger and the discussion to replace animal testing, reduce the number of animal use, and improve animal use practices has reached its peak13,14. Recognizing that the use of adult human cardiomyocytes isolated from biopsy or explanted heart tissues is not very feasible to maintain in culture15, the cell-based model has gained attention for the evaluation of drug cardiotoxicity at the preclinical stage.
There have been various in vitro screening approaches to assess the cardiotoxic effect of any drug molecule using cardiac cell lines and stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes16. Among stem cells, the ethical concern associated with the isolation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and teratoma formation ability by both the ESCs and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) still causes hindrance in their utility17,18. Apart from self-renewal property and multilineage differentiation ability, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from prenatal tissues have additional features such as the presence of anti-aging regulatory factors and immunomodulatory properties19,20 and these traits of MSCs make it a potential alternative to ESCs and iPSCs. MSCs have been isolated from birth-associated tissues including the placenta, umbilical cord, Wharton’s jelly, cord blood, amniotic membrane, and amniotic fluid21. The placenta is mainly regarded as medical waste but it is a rich source of MSCs. One of the significant benefits of birth-associated tissues is their ready availability, non-invasive procedures of isolation, and they have no significant ethical and teratoma formation concerns22. Many research groups including ours previously demonstrated the cardiomyogenic differentiation potential of human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJMSCs). The prominent cardiac markers such as actin alpha cardiac muscle 1 (ACTC1), troponin T, Nkx2.5, and beta-myosin heavy chain (β-MHC) expression were found in differentiated cardiomyocytes23,24,25,26,27. Mechanistically, an epigenetic modification by the inducers directs the MSCs to differentiate into cardiomyocytes28,29.
Another alternative for animal use is H9C2 cells, an immortalized cell line derived from rat ventricular tissue. H9C2 cells are easily cultured, homogeneous cardiac cells population with rapid expansion property30. Several studies have considered H9C2 cells as a model for a wide range of toxicological studies due to their ability to respond to cardiac pathological stimulus, energy-related characteristics, glycolytic and energy metabolism, calcium handling, and electrophysiological properties30,31,32. However, considering the few obvious limitations9,33, we have included H9C2 cells to understand the preliminary differences in drug response between immortalized rat cardiomyocytes and primary human cardiomyocytes.
Besides primary and immortalized cardiomyocytes, human iPSCs-derived cardiomyocytes have gained attention over the last few years34,35,36,37. The hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes exhibited major cardiac properties and have been able to recapitulate to different cardiac disease phenotypes34,38,39,40,41. Despite many advantages, hiPSCs are still far from perfect. The main challenges are the immature nature of cardiac cells which majorly emerges due to differences in induction cocktails, batch-wise variation in differentiation, and the reprogramming process itself may face setbacks due to undesired mutation or genomic instability17,42.
In this study, we constructed a cardiotoxicity testing model using cardiomyocytes derived from human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJMSCs) obtained from the umbilical cord to test the cardiotoxicity effect of two sets of novel oncotherapeutics which were derived from quercetin and cinnamic acid by Rao et al.43,44,45 which showed potent inhibition to colorectal cancer. We could observe cardiotoxicity and in some cases, lack of it using stem cell-derived human cardiomyocyte and rat H9C2 cardiomyoblast testing platforms.
Material and methods
Quercetin analogues (QMJ-2, QMJ-5, QMJ-6) and cinnamic acid analogues (NMJ-1, NMJ-2, NMJ-3) were synthesized in MCOPS, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India and previously reported as potent anti-cancer drugs against colorectal cancer43,44. Doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin were obtained from Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA.
Mesenchymal stem cells from Wharton’s jelly (WJMSCs) were isolated from the Wharton’s jelly of the human umbilical cord via enzymatic digestion as described previously with slight modifications23. Experiments were performed after obtaining clearance from Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC), Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India. Informed consent was obtained from the donor and all the experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Rat cardiomyoblast cell line, H9C2 was obtained from National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India. WJMSCs were maintained in Knockout™ Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (KO-DMEM/F-12; Gibco, MA, USA) with 10% Fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, MA, USA), 1X GlutaMAX (Gibco, MA, USA), and 1X Antibiotic Antimycotic Solution (Gibco, MA, USA). H9C2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium–High Glucose (DMEM-HG; Gibco, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1X Antibiotic–Antimycotic solution at 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubator.
Differentiation of WJMSCs was done using a proprietary combination of DNMT and HDAC inhibitors in KO-DMEM/F-12 containing 10% FBS for 48 h. Induction media was replaced with culture media i.e. KO-DMEM/F-12 with 1X GlutaMAX and, 10% FBS after 48 h for 7 days23.
WJMSC-derived cardiomyocytes (WJCM) and H9C2 were treated with NMJ and QMJ analogues for 24 h. The concentration of these compounds was based on their previously reported IC50 values which were obtained using Vero, a non-cancerous cell line i.e., QMJ-2 (140 µM), QMJ-5 (55.6 µM), QMJ-6 (153 µM), NMJ-1 (9.7 µM), NMJ-2 (8.2 µM), NMJ-3 (15.1 µM)43,44. To illustrate the toxicity specific to cardiac cells and not a general cytotoxicity, WJMSCs were treated with positive cardiotoxic drugs. The positive cardiotoxic drugs used were doxorubicin (Dox)46, 5-fluorouracil (5FU)47, and cisplatin (Cis)48.
Cell viability assays
WJMSCs were treated with Dox (1 µM), 5FU (1 µM), and Cis (5 µM) for 24 h and then MTT and CCK-8 assays were performed. Similarly, the toxicity of these compounds in terms of the viability of cells was estimated by using the MTT assay and cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. For MTT assay, after 24 h of treatments, MTT (5 mg/ml of PBS; HiMedia, India) was added, and cells were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. The formazan crystals that were formed after the incubation were dissolved using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). For the CCK-8 assay, 10 μL of CCK-8 solution (Boster Biological Technology, Pleasanton, CA, USA) was added to each well and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. The absorbance for MTT and CCK-8 assay was measured at 570 nm and 450 nm respectively using the EnSight™ Multimode plate reader (Perkin Elmer, MA, USA)49,50.
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay
LDH activity was observed in WJMSCs treated with positive cardiotoxic drugs as well as in the H9C2 cells and WJCM after they were exposed to QMJ and NMJ analogues using Pierce LDH cytotoxicity assay kit (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). The experiment was performed as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Absorbance was taken at 490 nm and 680 nm (background signal) using multimode plate reader. LDH activity was calculated by subtracting absorbance taken at 680 nm from 490 nm.
Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay
Generation of ROS was detected using Fluorometric intracellular ROS kit (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) as per manufacturer’s protocol. Fluorescence was measured at excitation and emission of 650 nm and 675 nm respectively via multimode plate reader50,51.
Nitric oxide (NO) release was estimated using the Griess assay. Briefly, after 24 h of drug treatment, Griess reagent (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) was added to cells in equal volume and incubated for 30 min in the dark, and absorbance was taken at 540 nm via multimode plate reader23.
Intracellular calcium flux was measured using the fluorescent radiometric Ca2+ indicator, Fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester (Fura-2, AM; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). Briefly, after 24 h of treatment, Fura-2AM (1 μmol/L) was added to cells and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. The intracellular calcium flux was measured at excitation of 340 nm and 380 nm and emission of 510 nm using a multimode plate reader.
Mitochondrial membrane potential of the cells after drug treatment was detected using tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester dye (TMRE; Molecular Probes, CA, USA). The cells were incubated with 0.3 µM TMRE dye and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in dark. Fluorescence intensity of TMRE was measured at excitation and emission of 549 nm and 574 nm respectively via a multimode plate reader.
Gene expression analysis
Total ribonucleic acid (RNA) was isolated using RNAiso Plus (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) followed by cDNA conversion using PrimeScript™ 1st strand cDNA synthesis kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed by using TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNase H Plus; TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) for cardiac markers in a QuantStudio™ 5 real-time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, USA). All the primers were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Bangalore, India (Table 1). The relative gene expression was calculated using 2-∆∆CT and GAPDH, a housekeeping gene was used as endogenous control52,53.
Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism v8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA) and are expressed as mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post-test was performed. Data were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.
Generation of cardiomyocytes from WJMSCs
The chemical structure of the analogues of quercetin QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and QMJ-6, and cinnamic acid NMJ-1, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 used in the study are indicated (Fig. 1a–f). H9C2 cells (Fig. 1g) and WJMSCs were differentiated into cardiomyocytes (WJCM) using 5-azacytidine and Trichostatin A (TSA) (Fig. 1h). Gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR confirmed the presence of cardiac markers NKX2.5, GATA binding protein 4 (GATA4), Troponin I, Troponin T and myosin heavy chain-alpha (MHC⍺) in WJCM as compared to WJMSCs (Fig. 1i). To differentiate the cardiotoxicity from general cell toxicity, we performed MTT (Fig. 1j), CCK-8 (Fig. 1k), and LDH (Fig. 1l) assays in undifferentiated WJMSCs. We treated the WJMSCs with Dox, 5FU, and Cis for 24 h. There was no significant difference observed which suggests that toxicity is selective to WJCM.
Assessment of quercetin and cinnamic acid analogues on viability and survival of rat cardiomyocytes and WJCM
Cardiotoxicity of quercetin (3-hydroxyflavone; QMJ) and cinnamic acid (cinnamyl sulphonamide hydroxamate; NMJ) analogues were determined by MTT cell viability, CCK-8, and LDH assay. H9C2 cells and WJCM were exposed to drug derivatives or oncotherapeutic, Dox (1 µM) for 24 h. We observed a decrease in viability of H9C2 cells to about 10–20% after treatment with QMJ-2, 5, NMJ-1, and 3, and about a 25% decrease in viability with Dox, the positive cardiotoxic drug control. Surprisingly, QMJ-6 and NMJ-3 showed an increase in viability and were not cardiotoxic (Fig. 2a). We then performed a CCK-8 assay to further confirm these results and obtained similar results (Fig. 2b). These results were comparable to WJCM wherein QMJ-6 and NMJ-3 were less toxic as compared to other QMJ and NMJ analogues whereas Dox treatment reduced cell viability drastically (Fig. 2d,e). We observed that NMJ-2 was also less toxic and similar to NMJ-3 in WJCM (Fig. 2e). To further investigate the effect of quercetin and cinnamic acid analogues, we measured the activity of LDH. In both H9C2 cells and WJCM, an increase in LDH was observed in cells treated with QMJ-2, QMJ-5, NMJ-1, and NMJ-2 which indicates a clear response to cell membrane injury. On the other hand, QMJ-6 and NMJ-3 treatment showed no to little change in LDH release in both H9C2 cells and WJCM (Fig. 2c,f).
Status of ROS generation and NO release upon treatment with quercetin and cinnamic acid analogues
Excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) is one of the main sources of cell damage which leads to cardiotoxicity. We thus measured ROS activity in H9C2 cells and WJCM after exposure to the drug analogues. Similar to previous results, both QMJ-6 and NMJ-3 were not toxic to the cells, and along with NMJ-2 in WJCM, there was lowered ROS activity whereas an increase in ROS activity was detected after treatment with the rest of the analogues (Fig. 3a,d). Furthermore, we also estimated the levels of nitric oxide (NO), a known vasodilator54 by using a modified Griess reagent. QMJ-6 and NMJ-2 in H9C2 cells (Fig. 3b) and NMJ-2 in WJCM elevated NO levels while NMJ-3 decreased NO level by 12% WJCM (Fig. 3e). Rest of the analogues did not show much effect.
Cardiotoxic effect of quercetin and cinnamic acid analogues on calcium accumulation
Initiation of myocardial injury and impairment of contractile function is thought to be caused due to accumulation of intracellular Ca2+. Here, we observed a decrease in Ca2+ accumulation after exposure of cells to QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 in both H9C2 and WJCM cells (Fig. 3c,f). The other analogues studied displayed cardiotoxicity similar to Dox (in WJCM) or higher calcium accumulation (in H9C2).
Modulation of mitochondrial membrane potential after treatment with quercetin and cinnamic acid analogues
Depolarization of mitochondrial membrane and associated ROS production leads to induction of apoptosis in cells. We observed increased mitochondrial membrane potential using TMRE in H9C2 cells treated with QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 (Fig. 4a,b) and WJCM treated with QMJ-6 and NMJ-3 (Fig. 4c,d) detected quantitatively and by fluorescent microscopy.
Expression of cardiac markers after treatment with quercetin and cinnamic acid analogues in WJCM
To further investigate the cardiotoxic effect of these compounds in human-derived cardiomyocytes, we exposed WJCM with quercetin and cinnamic acid analogues followed by qRT-PCR analysis for cardiac genes. In concordance with the cardiotoxic parameters tested, it was also seen that drug analogues QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 decreased the expression of cardiac genes GATA-4, Troponin I, and MHC⍺ (Fig. 5b–e). Treatment of QMJ-6 and NMJ-2 caused a significant increase in the expression of NKX2.5 (Fig. 5a) whereas QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 treated cells saw a marked upregulation of GATA4 (Fig. 5b), Troponin I (Fig. 5c), and MHC⍺ (Fig. 5e). Significantly QMJ-6 and NMJ-3 showed an emphatically higher (8–10 fold) Troponin T gene expression (Fig. 5d) with a milder increase observed with treatment with QMJ-2 and NMJ-2. The treatment of cardiotoxic drugs Dox, 5FU, and Cis reduced all the cardiac markers expression drastically.
For many years, clinical data have substantially demonstrated that cancer drug-induced cardiotoxicity among cancer survivors leads to the loss of cardiomyocytes which ultimately compromises heart function55. There is a need for testing the hidden cardiotoxicity of any drug molecule before administering it to patients which will also increase the success rate of the drug marketing process. We thus need a suitable human-based model to test the cardiotoxicity. In this present study, we have established a cardiomyocytes model derived from human WJMSCs and assessed the utility of cardiomyocytes in monitoring the cardiotoxic events of novel anticancer drug molecules at the cellular and functional level. The advantage of using WJMSCs is that it is isolated using a non-invasive method and from a surgically discarded tissue. We have optimized an easy differentiation procedure to generate cardiomyocytes. These differentiated cells can be further cultured and maintained in a hassle-free manner.
Our lab has previously reported the isolation of WJMSCs and their differentiation into functional cardiomyocytes23,53. Along with primary cardiomyocytes, based on the characteristics features, we considered H9C2 cells to understand and compare the impact of cardiotoxicity in an immortalized cell line with primary differentiated cardiomyocytes. For instance, the presence of cytoskeletal protein, beta-tubulin II, and their interactions with mitochondria is very crucial for energy metabolism in the heart. Kuznetsov et al.32 attempted to study the difference in bioenergetics, and metabolic and functional characteristics between HL-1 (adult immortalized atrial cells) and H9C2 cells. It was found that beta-tubulin II was absent in HL-1 but present in H9C2 cells which suggest that H9C2 cells are bioenergetically/biochemically similar to primary cardiomyocytes. The heart requires an extensive amount of energy to carry out the function of blood pumping and 80% of the energy is supplied by mitochondria. The study revealed that the H9C2 cell has a content of mitochondrial mass, increased respiration rate, and enhanced ATP level in comparison to HL-1 cells32.
We investigated the effects of 3-hydroxyflavone (QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and QMJ-6) and cinnamyl sulfonamide-hydroxamate (NMJ-1, NMJ-2, NMJ-3) in WJCM and H9C2 cells using the concentrations reported for non-cancerous Vero cells. The prerequisite for any synthesized drug molecules is that they should be nontoxic to cardiac cells. We could show by MTT, CCK-8, and LDH assay that QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 had no cytotoxic effect against cardiomyocytes whereas QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 had induced toxicity suggesting that QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 that these drugs could have an off-target cardiotoxic effect in vivo.
The cancer drug-induced toxicity in patients is still an unavoidable clinical hurdle. The root of the problem is at the cellular level when chemotherapeutic drugs fail to differentiate between normal cells and tumor cells and indiscriminately target the normal cells causing undesired cytotoxicity. Therefore, a representative in vitro toxicity model is needed to understand the difference between target and non-target cells and then predict the possible toxicity56.
In our study, we checked the ability of our model to sense the difference between target and non-target cells, we performed cytotoxicity assays in undifferentiated Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells considering them as normal cells to test the effect of chemotherapeutic drugs. We treated the WJMSCs with Dox, 5FU, and Cis at the same concentration used for cardiomyocytes. Interestingly, we found that these drugs do not exert any toxicity to WJMSCs and it shows that the model predicting the toxicity is specific to cardiac cells. Furthermore, studying primary cardiomyocytes provides many inherent benefits over whole-heart models whereas H9C2 cells have been the workhorse of in vitro cardiotoxic studies, both offering thorough control of experimental conditions including functionality, bioenergetics, metabolism, and genetic manipulations.
ROS at low amounts acts as “redox messengers” in the proliferation, survival, and differentiation of the cell. Meanwhile, disruption of mitochondria produces high ROS that ultimately becomes a reason for apoptosis57. During cardiotoxicity, elevated ROS alters physiological signaling responses which cause cellular hypertrophy, ventricular remodeling, sarcomeric instability, and calcium homeostasis, all these phenomena eventually induces cardiomyocytes death58. ROS generation damages the DNA and reduces the DNA binding activity of GATA binding protein 4 (GATA4), a critical cardiomyocytes transcriptional factor59. Our study showed that the ROS level remained unaffected in QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 treated cardiomyocytes, however, QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 treatment increased ROS levels that ultimately reduced cell viability. Dox generates ROS as a prime mechanism to induce toxicity against cardiomyocytes60. In the present study, increased ROS level in dox treatment is in agreement with the established mechanism.
Nitric oxide is a vasodilator, modulator of blood pressure, vascular tone, and hemodynamics61 and NO addition promoted differentiation of embryonic stem cells into myocardial cells62,63. Production of NO gets altered by the binding of Dox leading to superoxide formation10. In our studies, we could demonstrate that Dox addition had reduced NO production, however, the synthesized compounds have not caused any changes in NO levels which indicates that NO physiology remains unaffected.
Cardiotoxicity induces dysregulation of intracellular calcium levels within cardiac cells that imply a cardiac remodeling. The toxicity suppresses mitochondrial respiration causing a low ATP state, which in turn slows the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) which causes an increase in diastolic potential. This change in intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis is due to Ca2+ unloading from the sarcoplasmic reticulum64 which might lower the heart systolic potential and increase the chance of sudden cardiac arrest65,66,67. In our study, we observed that the intracellular calcium level remained low in QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 treated cardiomyocytes, whereas QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 exposure has increased the level indicating dysregulation of calcium homeostasis. Dox promotes the calcium accumulation in the mitochondria via the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores which alters the calcium balance68. Our result confirms the alternation in calcium due to Dox treatment.
Mitochondrial-mediated cell death has emerged as a major mechanism for the death of cardiomyocytes. Cardiotoxicity disrupts mitochondria and their membrane potential which generates oxidative stress causing excessive ROS production in cardiomyocytes58. Upon treatment of cardiomyocytes with QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3, we observed that active mitochondria status remains unaffected whereas, in QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 treatment cardiomyocytes displayed a loss of mitochondria. However, Dox treatment affected cardiomyocyte mitochondrial activity in concordance with the previous report60.
Cardiotoxicity drastically impacts the expression of cardiac genes such as NKX2.5, GATA4, cardiac troponins I and T, and myosin heavy chain alpha which are the functional markers of cardiomyocytes and can be used to assess cardiomyocyte's health and predict cardiac injury69,70. Troponins are the gold standard biomarkers that appear in blood with an increase in level within 2–3 h after myocardial damage due to cardiotoxicity71. A clinical study found various troponin I release pattern in breast cancer patients before and after chemotherapy where the major number of patients after chemotherapy had increased troponin I level suggesting that they could have a higher incidence of adverse heart effects and a greater left ventricular ejection fraction reduction as compared with patients who had little increase in troponin I level72. In the current study, using WJCM, we could see that similar other parameters assessed for cardiotoxicity, QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 had a drastic reduction in the cardiac marker gene expression, similar to the cardiotoxic effect of Dox, 5FU, and Cis whereas QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 had no significant impact on cardiac-specific genes. Thus, it is evident that across the parameters analyzed, quercetin and cinnamic acid derivatives QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 are cardiotoxic, similar to the known cardiotoxic oncotherapeutics Dox, 5FU, and Cis whereas derivatives QMJ-6, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 do not display significant cardiotoxicity. Furthermore, the compounds QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and NMJ-1 at a concentration of 68 μM, 27.4 μM, and 5.07 μM respectively found effective against cancer could be also actually toxic to cardiomyocytes. We considered the concentrations based on previously reported studies. In the previous studies, the in vitro cytotoxicity assay in Vero cells revealed that the treatment of derivatives QMJ-2, QMJ-5, QMJ-6, NMJ-1, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 at concentrations of 140 µM, 55.6 µM, 153 µM, 9.7 µM, 8.2 µM, and 15.1 µM respectively reduces the cell viability by 50%. Vero cells are one of the most commonly used mammalian cell lines to study drug efficacy. Given that, we used the same concentrations to test the cardiotoxic effect in our model. Our observation suggests that the cardiotoxicity was specific to the derivative and not an outcome of concentrations. For example, NMJ-1 which was of quite low concentration i.e., 9.7 µM showed cardiotoxicity whereas QMJ-6 at a concentration of 153 µM was found non-cardiotoxic. The data obtained thus justified the purpose of the model which is to detect the cardiotoxicity exerted by any compound and the results are highly comparable with positive controls. To reduce the cardiotoxicity of these analogues, optimum concentration will have to be fixed which is effective against cancers and is not toxic to cardiomyocytes.
The analogues QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and QMJ-6 are the result of substitutions in the 3-hydroxyflavone, a backbone of all flavonols whereas NMJ-1, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 have been obtained after the modification based on bio-isosterism in the cinnamic acid moiety. Specifically, QMJ-2, QMJ-5, and QMJ-6 are 3-hydroxyflavone analogue with a methyl, di-methyl, and methyl and a methoxy substitution on the phenyl ring respectively44. NMJ-1, NMJ-2, and NMJ-3 are cinnamyl sulfonamide hydroxamate derivative with thiophene methyl amine, thiophene ethyl amine, and furfurylamine substitution respectively43,45. With various fundamental medicinal chemistry principles such as bio-isosterism, a wide range of chemical compounds are being synthesized with the purpose to augment absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET), improving efficacy, and enhancing chemical accessibility73. Fluorouracil is itself a chemical modification74. Furthermore, to overcome the issue of drug resistance and cardiotoxicity, Dox75 has undergone several structural modifications, and new drug entities such as epirubicin, pirarubicin, valrubicin, and idarubicin have been synthesized73. The chemical modification brings significant therapeutic consequences and makes the lead compound highly relevant biologically76. In the Dox structure, the lipophilic part demonstrated acidic and hydrophilic amine sugar part showed basic nature which makes them soluble in both lipophilic and hydrophilic types of solvents so they bind to the plasma protein and cell membrane. Upon entering into the cells, Dox intercalates into nucleic acids and inhibits topoisomerase II which explains the mode of action. During the cell-killing action, excessive calcium release and dysregulation of mitochondrial function leads to the undesired outcomes77,78. Similarly, the analogues used in this study went through different chemical substitution with methyl and amine groups which may impact the molecular lipophilicity and cellular uptake and these could be possible reasons behind the cardiotoxicity as an off-target effect. However, it would be very interesting to study further the association of structural modification and its off-target effect.
A limitation of the study is that we have only assessed three chemotherapeutic drugs (Doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin). There are other classes of chemotherapeutic drugs which exerts cardiotoxicity, as well as various potential natural compounds which may have hidden cardiotoxic effect and so analysing their cardiotoxicity in our model, might have given new prospect. To establish the cardiotoxic effect, we have included an established cell line, H9C2 cells for comparison. Likewise, iPSCs-derived cardiomyocytes have been widely used to study cardiotoxicity. An inclusion of iPSCs would have made the comparison more exhaustive, however, iPSCs hold a set of challenges for disease modelling including cardiovascular diseases79,80. It has been observed that experimental and genetic variability in iPSCs can be overcome up to a certain limit but iPSCs culturing and maintenance is expensive and remains out of budget for many research labs across the world. Regarding animal studies, because of shortcomings like high cost, interspecies variability, and ethical concerns, the demand for an alternative to animal use is rising14.
In our study, we tested synthetic compounds which have already shown anti-cancer effects. Our model further indicates that the concentrations of few compounds which exerted anticancer effect could possibly show cardiotoxic effect too. We included experiments to study cardiotoxicity which result in cardiomyocyte death which is mainly mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. We believe that our model and experiments can be used to study hidden cardiotoxicity of other synthesized compounds, natural compounds, drugs molecules, etc.
In summary, by studying the oncotherapeutic molecules in human stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes we could effectively ascertain the varying cardiotoxic response of these molecules. From a perspective of human origin, human stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes could be a perfect preclinical cell-based model to study cardiotoxic events and reduce the dependence on animal usage in drug safety research.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 (2018).
Miller, K. D. et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 69, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21565 (2019).
Curigliano, G. et al. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: Epidemiology, detection, and management. CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 309–325. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21341 (2016).
Florescu, M., Cinteza, M. & Vinereanu, D. Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Maedica 8, 59–67 (2013).
Gavila, J. et al. Evaluation and management of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer: a Delphi study. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 19, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-016-1508-y (2017).
Zamorano, J. L. et al. 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. J. Heart Fail. 19, 9–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.654 (2017).
Thomford, N. E. et al. Natural products for drug discovery in the 21st century: Innovations for novel drug discovery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061578 (2018).
Somarelli, J. A. et al. Improving cancer drug discovery by studying cancer across the tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz254 (2020).
Peter, A. K., Bjerke, M. A. & Leinwand, L. A. Biology of the cardiac myocyte in heart disease. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 2149–2160. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-01-0038 (2016).
Hahn, V. S., Lenihan, D. J. & Ky, B. Cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity: Basic mechanisms and potential cardioprotective therapies. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 3, e000665. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000665 (2014).
Sachinidis, A. Cardiotoxicity and heart failure: Lessons from human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes and anticancer drugs. Cells 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9041001 (2020).
Van Norman, G. A. Limitations of animal studies for predicting toxicity in clinical trials: Part 2: Potential alternatives to the use of animals in preclinical trials. JACC. Basic Transl. Sci. 5, 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.03.010 (2020).
Eder, A., Vollert, I., Hansen, A. & Eschenhagen, T. Human engineered heart tissue as a model system for drug testing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 96, 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.05.010 (2016).
van der Velden, J. et al. Animal models and animal-free innovations for cardiovascular research: current status and routes to be explored. Consensus document of the ESC working group on myocardial function and the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart. Cardiovasc. Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab370 (2022).
Prior, H., Casey, W., Kimber, I., Whelan, M. & Sewell, F. Reflections on the progress towards non-animal methods for acute toxicity testing of chemicals. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. RTP 102, 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.12.008 (2019).
Shi, M. et al. Evaluation of in vitro models of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes to screen for potential cardiotoxicity of chemicals. Toxicol. In Vitro Int. J. Publ. Asso. BIBRA 67, 104891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104891 (2020).
Parrotta, E. I., Lucchino, V., Scaramuzzino, L., Scalise, S. & Cuda, G. Modeling cardiac disease mechanisms using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: Progress, promises and challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124354 (2020).
Zakrzewski, W., Dobrzynski, M., Szymonowicz, M. & Rybak, Z. Stem cells: Past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 10, 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5 (2019).
Kalaszczynska, I. & Ferdyn, K. Wharton’s jelly derived mesenchymal stem cells: future of regenerative medicine? Recent findings and clinical significance. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 430847. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/430847 (2015).
Viswanathan, S. et al. Mesenchymal stem versus stromal cells: International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy (ISCT(R)) mesenchymal stromal cell committee position statement on nomenclature. Cytotherapy 21, 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.08.002 (2019).
Hass, R., Kasper, C., Bohm, S. & Jacobs, R. Different populations and sources of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC): A comparison of adult and neonatal tissue-derived MSC. Cell Commun. Signal 9, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-811X-9-12 (2011).
Ullah, I., Subbarao, R. B. & Rho, G. J. Human mesenchymal stem cells—current trends and future prospective. Biosci. Rep. 35. 10.1042/BSR20150025 (2015).
Bhuvanalakshmi, G., Arfuso, F., Kumar, A. P., Dharmarajan, A. & Warrier, S. Epigenetic reprogramming converts human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells into functional cardiomyocytes by differential regulation of Wnt mediators. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 8, 185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0638-7 (2017).
Antonitsis, P., Ioannidou-Papagiannaki, E., Kaidoglou, A. & Papakonstantinou, C. In vitro cardiomyogenic differentiation of adult human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. The role of 5-azacytidine. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thoracic Surg. 6, 593–597. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2007.157875 (2007).
Nartprayut, K. et al. Cardiomyocyte differentiation of perinatallyderived mesenchymal stem cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 7, 1465–1469. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1356 (2013).
Qian, Q. et al. 5-Azacytidine induces cardiac differentiation of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells by activating extracellular regulated kinase. Stem Cells Dev. 21, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2010.0519 (2012).
Yang, G. et al. Trichostatin a promotes cardiomyocyte differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells after 5-azacytidine induction or during coculture with neonatal cardiomyocytes via a mechanism independent of histone deacetylase inhibition. Cell Transplant. 21, 985–996. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368911X593145 (2012).
Singh, A., Singh, A. & Sen, D. Mesenchymal stem cells in cardiac regeneration: A detailed progress report of the last 6 years (2010–2015). Stem Cell Res. Ther. 7, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0341-0 (2016).
Guo, X. et al. Cardiomyocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow: New regulators and its implications. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 9, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0773-9 (2018).
Branco, A. F. et al. Gene expression profiling of H9c2 myoblast differentiation towards a cardiac-like phenotype. PLoS ONE 10, e0129303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129303 (2015).
Watkins, S. J., Borthwick, G. M. & Arthur, H. M. The H9C2 cell line and primary neonatal cardiomyocyte cells show similar hypertrophic responses in vitro. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Animal 47, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-010-9368-1 (2011).
Kuznetsov, A. V., Javadov, S., Sickinger, S., Frotschnig, S. & Grimm, M. H9c2 and HL-1 cells demonstrate distinct features of energy metabolism, mitochondrial function and sensitivity to hypoxia-reoxygenation. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 276–284, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.11.015 (1853).
Onodi, Z. et al. Systematic transcriptomic and phenotypic characterization of human and murine cardiac myocyte cell lines and primary cardiomyocytes reveals serious limitations and low resemblances to adult cardiac phenotype. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 165, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2021.12.007 (2022).
Sharma, A. et al. Use of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes to assess drug cardiotoxicity. Nat. Protoc. 13, 3018–3041. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0076-8 (2018).
Stella Stoter, A. M., Hirt, M. N., Stenzig, J. & Weinberger, F. Assessment of cardiotoxicity with stem cell-based strategies. Clin. Ther. 42, 1892–1910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.08.012 (2020).
Gintant, G. et al. Use of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in preclinical cancer drug cardiotoxicity testing: A scientific statement from the American heart association. Circ. Res. 125, e75–e92. https://doi.org/10.1161/RES.0000000000000291 (2019).
Schwach, V., Slaats, R. H. & Passier, R. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for assessment of anticancer drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 7, 50. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00050 (2020).
Ovics, P. et al. Drug development and the use of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for disease modeling and drug toxicity screening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197320 (2020).
Kofron, C. M. et al. A predictive in vitro risk assessment platform for pro-arrhythmic toxicity using human 3D cardiac microtissues. Sci. Rep. 11, 10228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89478-9 (2021).
Pourrier, M. & Fedida, D. the emergence of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) as a platform to model arrhythmogenic diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020657 (2020).
Nakao, S., Ihara, D., Hasegawa, K. & Kawamura, T. Applications for induced pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug development for heart diseases. Eur. Cardiol. 15, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2019.03 (2020).
Fonoudi, H. & Burridge, P. W. Cellular model systems to study cardiovascular injury from chemotherapy. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 51, 890–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02299-x (2021).
Reddy, N. D. et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of novel cinnamyl sulfonamide hydroxamate derivative against colon adenocarcinoma. Chem. Biol. Interact. 233, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2015.03.015 (2015).
Biswas, S., Reddy, N. D., Jayashree, B. & Rao, C. M. Evaluation of novel 3-hydroxyflavone analogues as HDAC inhibitors against colorectal cancer. Adv. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018 (2018).
Reddy, N. D. et al. An appraisal of cinnamyl sulfonamide hydroxamate derivatives (HDAC inhibitors) for anti-cancer, anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic activities in human cancer cells. Chem. Biol. Interact. 253, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2016.05.008 (2016).
Zhuo, M., Gorgun, F. M., Tyler, D. S. & Englander, E. W. Hypoxia potentiates the capacity of melanoma cells to evade cisplatin and doxorubicin cytotoxicity via glycolytic shift. FEBS Open Bio 10, 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12830 (2020).
Ando, T. et al. Relationship between expression of 5-fluorouracil metabolic enzymes and 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in esophageal carcinoma cell lines. Dis. Esophagus 21, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00700.x (2008).
Barakat, K. H. et al. Virtual screening and biological evaluation of inhibitors targeting the XPA-ERCC1 interaction. PLoS ONE 7, e51329. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051329 (2012).
Warrier, S. et al. Cancer stem-like cells from head and neck cancers are chemosensitized by the Wnt antagonist, sFRP4, by inducing apoptosis, decreasing stemness, drug resistance and epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cancer Gene Ther 21, 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2014.42 (2014).
Mandal, S., Gamit, N., Varier, L., Dharmarajan, A. & Warrier, S. Inhibition of breast cancer stem-like cells by a triterpenoid, ursolic acid, via activation of Wnt antagonist, sFRP4 and suppression of miRNA-499a-5p. Life Sci. 265, 118854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118854 (2021).
Bhuvanalakshmi, G. et al. Breast cancer stem-like cells are inhibited by diosgenin, a steroidal saponin, by the attenuation of the Wnt beta-catenin signaling via the Wnt antagonist secreted frizzled related protein-4. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00124 (2017).
Bhuvanalakshmi, G. et al. Stemness, pluripotentiality, and Wnt antagonism: sFRP4, a Wnt antagonist mediates pluripotency and stemness in glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11010025 (2018).
Mandal, S., Arfuso, F., Sethi, G., Dharmarajan, A. & Warrier, S. Encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) as a novel anti-cancer agent targeting breast cancer stem cells: Development of 3D primed therapeutic MSCs. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 110, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2019.02.001 (2019).
Chen, K., Pittman, R. N. & Popel, A. S. Nitric oxide in the vasculature: where does it come from and where does it go? A quantitative perspective. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 10, 1185–1198. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2007.1959 (2008).
Spater, D., Hansson, E. M., Zangi, L. & Chien, K. R. How to make a cardiomyocyte. Development 141, 4418–4431. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.091538 (2014).
Madorran, E., Stozer, A., Bevc, S. & Maver, U. In vitro toxicity model: Upgrades to bridge the gap between preclinical and clinical research. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 20, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2019.4378 (2020).
Murphy, M. P. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem. J. 417, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20081386 (2009).
Roucou, X., Antonsson, B. & Martinou, J. C. Involvement of mitochondria in apoptosis. Cardiol. Clin. 19, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0733-8651(05)70194-6 (2001).
Redza-Dutordoir, M. & Averill-Bates, D. A. Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 2977–2992, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.09.012 (1863).
Wenningmann, N., Knapp, M., Ande, A., Vaidya, T. R. & Ait-Oudhia, S. Insights into doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: Molecular mechanisms, preventive strategies, and early monitoring. Mol. Pharmacol. 96, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.119.115725 (2019).
Kanno, S. et al. Nitric oxide facilitates cardiomyogenesis in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 12277–12281. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401557101 (2004).
Mujoo, K. et al. Role of nitric oxide signaling components in differentiation of embryonic stem cells into myocardial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 18924–18929. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810230105 (2008).
Hodge, A. J., Zhong, J. & Lipke, E. A. Enhanced stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte differentiation in suspension culture by delivery of nitric oxide using S-nitrosocysteine. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 113, 882–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25849 (2016).
Venkataraman, R., Holcomb, M. R., Harder, R., Knollmann, B. C. & Baudenbacher, F. Ratiometric imaging of calcium during ischemia-reperfusion injury in isolated mouse hearts using Fura-2. Biomed. Eng. Online 11, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-11-39 (2012).
Salama, G. & Hwang, S. M. Simultaneous optical mapping of intracellular free calcium and action potentials from Langendorff perfused hearts. Curr. Protocols Cytom. Chapter 12, Unit 12 17. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy1217s49 (2009).
Maeda, A., Honda, M., Kuramochi, T. & Takabatake, T. Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity: Diastolic cardiac myocyte dysfunction as a result of impaired calcium handling in isolated cardiac myocytes. Jpn. Circ. J. 62, 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1253/jcj.62.505 (1998).
Maeda, A., Honda, M., Kuramochi, T., Tanaka, K. & Takabatake, T. An angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor protects against doxorubicin-induced impairment of calcium handling in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 24, 720–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.1997.tb02119.x (1997).
Thai, P. N. et al. Chronic diclofenac exposure increases mitochondrial oxidative stress, inflammatory mediators, and cardiac dysfunction. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-021-07253-4 (2021).
Allen, A. The cardiotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Semin. Oncol. 19, 529–542 (1992).
Herman, E. H. et al. Use of cardiac troponin T levels as an indicator of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Can. Res. 58, 195–197 (1998).
Mair, J. et al. How is cardiac troponin released from injured myocardium?. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 7, 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872617748553 (2018).
Cardinale, D. et al. Prognostic value of troponin I in cardiac risk stratification of cancer patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Circulation 109, 2749–2754. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000130926.51766.CC (2004).
Xiao, Z., Morris-Natschke, S. L. & Lee, K. H. Strategies for the optimization of natural leads to anticancer drugs or drug candidates. Med. Res. Rev. 36, 32–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21377 (2016).
Cohen, S. S., Flaks, J. G., Barner, H. D., Loeb, M. R. & Lichtenstein, J. The mode of action of 5-fluorouracil and its derivatives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 44, 1004–1012. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.44.10.1004 (1958).
Arcamone, F. et al. Adriamycin, 14-hydroxydaunomycin, a new antitumor antibiotic from S. peucetius var. caesius. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 11, 1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260110607 (1969).
Klebe, G. Recent developments in structure-based drug design. J. Mol. Med. 78, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001090000084 (2000).
Rawat, P. S., Jaiswal, A., Khurana, A., Bhatti, J. S. & Navik, U. Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: An update on the molecular mechanism and novel therapeutic strategies for effective management. Biomed. Pharmacother. 139, 111708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111708 (2021).
Cross, M. J. et al. Physiological, pharmacological and toxicological considerations of drug-induced structural cardiac injury. Br. J. Pharmacol. 172, 957–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.12979 (2015).
Youssef, A. A. et al. The promise and challenge of induced pluripotent stem cells for cardiovascular applications. JACC. Basic Trans. Sci. 1, 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.06.010 (2016).
Soldner, F. & Jaenisch, R. Medicine. iPSC disease modeling. Science 338, 1155–1156. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227682 (2012).
SM and NG are thankful for the support in the form of a scholarship from Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India. This work was supported partly by funding from the Department of Biotechnology, India (BT/PR9235/MED/31/258/2014), Indian Council of Medical Research, India (90/24/2012-BMS), Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, India [R.11013/27/2021-GIA/HR], Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India [BT/PR41903/MED/97/527/2021] and Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, India [SPG/2021/003724].
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mandal, S., Gamit, N., Biswas, S. et al. An efficient human stem cells derived cardiotoxicity testing platform for testing oncotherapeutic analogues of quercetin and cinnamic acid. Sci Rep 12, 21362 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21721-3
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.