Abstract
The acute phase response (APR) is an evolutionarily well-conserved part of the innate immune defense against pathogens. However, recent studies in bats yielded surprisingly diverse results compared to previous APR studies on both vertebrate and invertebrate species. This is especially interesting due to the known role of bats as reservoirs for viruses and other intracellular pathogens, while being susceptible to extracellular microorganisms such as some bacteria and fungi. To better understand these discrepancies and the reservoir-competence of bats, we mimicked bacterial, viral and fungal infections in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis) and quantified different aspects of the APR over a two-day period. Individuals reacted most strongly to a viral (PolyI:C) and a bacterial (LPS) antigen, reflected by an increase of haptoglobin levels (LPS) and an increase of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (PolyI:C and LPS). We did not detect fever, leukocytosis, body mass loss, or a change in the overall functioning of the innate immunity upon challenge with any antigen. We add evidence that bats respond selectively with APR to specific pathogens and that the activation of different parts of the immune system is species-specific.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Bats are an important mammalian order with respect to their biological diversity, but also to their epidemiological role, especially as putative reservoirs for several viral zoonotic pathogens1. Interestingly, bats tolerate many viral infections without showing clinical symptoms due to co-evolutionary adaptations1,2. In addition to viruses, bats harbour other zoonotic, especially intracellular, pathogens3: bacteria, e.g. Bartonella spp.4,5,6, fungi, e.g. Histoplasma capsulatum7 or protozoa, e.g. Plasmodium related parasites8. However, besides their role as reservoirs, they are vulnerable to various extracellular pathogens and parasites, showing pathological lesions during different bacterial9,10,11 and fungal1,12,13,14 infections. One of these pathogens, the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans, causes white-nose syndrome in North America resulting in mass mortalities in cave-dwelling hibernating bats with important economic and conservation consequences15,16. Over the past years, several immunogenetic and molecular immunological studies addressed why bats may be extraordinarily potent reservoirs for viruses17,18. However, our knowledge on their functional immune defenses against other pathogens, especially at the organismic level, is still limited3.
Bats have an extraordinary longevity19 and long-lived animals are considered to invest more in the adaptive part than in the innate part of the immune system20. However, the innate immune system is the first line of defense against pathogens and parasites, bats may fight pathogens already at an early infection state as have been shown with the interferon mediated anti-viral responses both in vitro and in vivo17. Once pathogens pass through the constitutive part of the innate immunity (e.g. antibacterial proteins and complement system), they are encountered by various phagocytic cells which recognize them via specific pathogen recognition systems, such as Toll-Like Receptors21. Besides aiming to kill the intruders, these cells, especially macrophages and dendritic cells, also initiate an acute phase response (APR)22,23. The APR is triggered by a signal cascade beginning with phagocytic cells that release pro-inflammatory cytokines21. An APR includes (1) leukocytosis, i.e. the increase in white blood cells, especially neutrophils, as a result of bone marrow activation; (2) fever and (3) sickness behavior, e.g. lethargy, anorexia24,25 and a consequent decrease in body mass26,27,28,29 which are the effects of the pro-inflammatory cytokines on the hypothalamus, fat tissues and muscles, respectively. Moreover, stimulating the hepatocytes, the liver increases the (4) synthesis of acute phase proteins (e.g. haptoglobin, serum amyloid A, C-reactive protein), which does not only decrease the multiplication of the pathogens, but also act as opsonins. Optimal responses to pathogens are evolutionary adaptive because they increase the chances for survival of the respective individual taking into account internal and external conditions. For example, by rising body temperature (fever) the organism impairs the replication of viruses and bacteria26,28 whereas both an overly high or insufficient low body temperature can have detrimental effects on individual fitness and are thus maladaptive. An APR is energetically and pathologically costly30 and requires the reallocation of resources from digestion, reproduction and locomotion to immune defense24,31. An APR can have severe consequences for the fitness of an individual, e.g. tissue damage, reduced growth, less investment in breeding and feeding activities22,24,32,33,34,35. Thus, a maximal APR to all pathogens may be maladaptive and only serve as an emergency strategy36.
The APR, especially during stimulated bacterial infections via lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenges, has been intensively studied under laboratory conditions in rodents living in an atypical, low-pathogen risk environment37,38,39, and in captive40,41, as well as free-ranging birds34,35,36; yet, studies in wild mammals are scarce. While phytohaemagglutinin and LPS are the most common antigens used to activate the innate immune system in wild birds, in the few studies on wild mammals the antigens applied are more diverse29,42,43,44,45,46. A deeper knowledge about the APR in wild mammals, especially bats, may be beneficial for identifying species of conservation interest47 and better forecast reservoir species and prioritize surveillance targets48, and for the development of treatments against the pathogens they carry. Moreover, simulating different types of infections might reveal further answers why the Chiropteran immune system is adapted to tolerate certain pathogens while remaining vigilant against others3.
To further shed light on the extent and specific dynamics of APR in wild animals, specifically bats, we conducted an immune challenge experiment designed to elicit an immune reaction in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis), an abundant, insectivorous bat species widely distributed across Europe. The objective of this study was to test whether the APR varies with antigen identity, as would be expected to optimize the trade-off between an investment in the immune system and other fitness-related traits31. Based on pathological and clinical differences observed between different types of pathogens (extracellular vs. intracellular3), we predicted that bats respond with an inflammatory response to bacterial and fungal, but not to viral infections. Our prediction on lack of APR to a viral antigen was based on previous studies showing that bats have a constitutive expression of the interferon type I (IFN α and β) with antiviral activity18 and also a unique anti-inflammatory response49.
Results
We obtained data on immune traits of 38 individual greater mouse-eared bats injected with either LPS (an endotoxin of gram-negative bacteria cell walls), polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (PolyI:C, a synthetic double-stranded RNA), zymosan (a fungal glucan) or saline solution (control) for almost all measurements. In one case, blood plasma volume was insufficient to conduct bacterial killing activity (BKA) measurement, and in one case the quality of blood smears was inadequate to conduct total and/or differential leukocyte counts.
Skin temperature, as a proxy for body temperature
Skin temperature (°C) showed diurnal fluctuations (ANOVA, F = 28.96, df = 11, p < 0.001; Fig. 1). We did not find an effect of treatment on skin temperature of bats (F = 0.42, df = 3, p = 0.741). The interaction between treatment and time elapsed since injection was also not significant (F = 1.16, df = 33, p = 0.261).
Body mass changes
Pre-injection body mass (g) did not differ across treatment groups (likelihood ratio test (LRT), df = 3, χ2 = 0.66, p = 0.88, n = 38). Treatment and the interaction between sampling time and treatment did not affect the change in body mass of individuals (LRTs, model with interaction vs. model without interaction: df = 3, χ2 = 0.11, p = 0.99; model with treatment vs. model without treatment: df = 3, χ2 = 4.39, p = 0.22, Fig. 2).
Bacterial killing activity (BKA) changes
Pre-injection BKA (number of viable bacteria after incubation) did not differ across treatment groups (LRT, df = 3, χ2 = 6.87, p = 0.08, n = 76).
Because the initial number of bacteria was different in the laboratory analyses for samples taken at 24 and 48 h after injection, respectively, we used percentage values as units of measurement as described in the methods section for further statistical analyses. Treatment and the interaction between sampling time and treatment did not affect the change in BKA (%) of individuals (LRTs, model with interaction vs. model without interaction: df = 3, χ2 = 2.06, p = 0.56; model with treatment vs. model without treatment: df = 3, χ2 = 2.3, p = 0.51, Fig. 3).
Haptoglobin level changes
Pre-injection levels of haptoglobin (mg/ml) did not differ across treatment groups (LRT, df = 3, χ2 = 0.5, p = 0.92, n = 38).
The interaction between sampling time and antigen did not affect the change in haptoglobin levels of individuals compared to before the injection (LRT, model with interaction between sampling time and treatment vs. model including sampling time and treatment, df = 3, χ2 = 2.07, p = 0.56, Fig. 4). Treatment affected haptoglobin levels (LRT, model including treatment vs. model without treatment (df = 3, χ2 = 13.75, p = 0.003). Haptoglobin levels significantly increased with time in animals injected with LPS compared to animals injected with saline solution and zymosan, where haptoglobin levels decreased (general linear hypothesis testing (GLHT), saline solution vs. LPS: Estimate = − 0.38, SE = 0.11, z = − 3.58, p = 0.002; zymosan vs. LPS: Estimate = − 0.3, SE = 0.11, z = − 2.81, p = 0.025). All other comparisons among treatment groups, including PolyI:C, did not yield significant results (Estimate < 0.22, p > 0.17, respectively).
Total leukocyte count changes
The total number of leukocytes did not differ across treatment groups before injection of antigen/saline solution (LRT, df = 3, χ2 = 10.15, p = 0.92, n = 38). Treatment and the interaction between sampling time and treatment did not affect the change in the total leukocyte counts of individuals compared to before the injection (LRTs, model with interaction vs. model without interaction: df = 3, χ2 = 0.78, p = 0.85; model with treatment vs. model without treatment: df = 3, χ2 = 1.61, p = 0.666, Fig. 5).
Relative numbers of lymphocytes
Relative numbers of lymphocytes (%) did not differ across treatment groups before injection of antigen/saline solution (LRT, df = 3, χ2 = 9.64, p = 0.92, n = 38).
The interaction between treatment and sampling time was significant (LRT, model with interaction vs. model without interaction: df = 3, χ2 = 12.36, p = 0.006, Fig. 6). Because we were only interested in comparisons across treatments for the same sampling time, we restricted our post hoc analyses to comparisons among treatment at 24 h and 48 h post injection (p.i.), respectively. Relative numbers of lymphocytes decreased in individuals treated with LPS or PolyI:C compared with individuals treated with saline solution 24 h p.i. (GLHT, saline solution vs. LPS: Estimate = − 24.18, SE = 7.52, z = − 3.21; p = 0.01; saline solution vs. PolyI:C: Estimate = − 27.88, SE = 7.52, z = − 3.71; p = 0.002). There were no differences between other combinations of treatment at 24 or 48 h p.i., respectively (GLHT, Estimate < 20.94; p > 0.053, respectively).
Relative numbers of neutrophils
Relative numbers of neutrophils (%) did significantly differ across treatment groups before injection of antigen/saline solution (LRT, df = 3, χ2 = 45.86, p < 0.001, n = 38, Fig. 7). Relative numbers of neutrophils tended to be lower in the LPS groups, thus in these animals there was a higher potential for an increase in neutrophil numbers compared with the other groups after injection of the antigen/saline solution.
The interaction between treatment and sampling time was significant (LRT, model with interaction vs. model without interaction: df = 3, χ2 = 8.44, p = 0.038). Because we were only interested in comparisons across treatments for the same sampling time, we restricted our post hoc analyses to comparisons among treatment at 24 h and 48 h p.i., respectively.
Relative numbers of neutrophils significantly increased in individuals treated with LPS or PolyI:C compared with individuals treated with saline solution 24 h p.i. (GLHT, LPS vs. saline solution: Estimate = 21.81, SE = 7.28, z = 3.0; p = 0.029; PolyI:C vs. saline solution: Estimate = 25.96, SE = 7.28, z = 3.56; p = 0.004). Relative numbers of neutrophils significantly increased in individuals treated with Poly I:C and LPS compared with individuals treated with zymosan where numbers decreased (GLHT, PolyI:C vs. zymosan: Estimate = 25.4, SE = 7.28; z = 3.49; p = 0.005; LPS vs. zymosan: Estimate = 21.25, SE = 7.28; z = 2.92; p = 0.036). There was no significant difference between other combinations of treatment groups (GLHT, Estimate < 14.78; p > 0.31, respectively).
Relative numbers of monocytes
Relative numbers of monocytes (%) did not differ across treatment groups before injection of antigen/saline solution (LRT, df = 3, χ2 = 4.66, p = 0.20, n = 38). Treatment and the interaction between sampling time and treatment did not affect the change in relative numbers of monocytes of individuals compared to before the injection (LRTs, model with interaction vs. model without interaction: df = 3, χ2 = 4.1, p = 0.25; model with treatment vs. model without treatment: df = 3, χ2 = 1.14, p = 0.77, Fig. 8).
Discussion
This study focused on the APR in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis) to three antigens mimicking bacterial (LPS), viral (PolyI:C) and fungal infections (zymosan). Confirming our hypothesis, we found that the APR varied with antigen identity. Individuals challenged with LPS and PolyI:C showed a response in the measured immune markers, i.e. a shift of relative numbers from lymphocytes to neutrophils, whereas in bats challenged with zymosan, we found a decrease in relative neutrophil numbers. In the zymosan and control group, haptoglobin levels decreased compared to LPS-challenged animals. Moreover, antigen challenges in this bat species had no effect on skin temperature, total leukocyte counts and relative numbers of monocytes and did not cause changes in body mass and in the function of the constitutive innate immunity (assessed by BKA).
Haptoglobin is an acute phase protein that usually occurs at low concentrations, but production and secretion is elevated in response to acute infection and trauma23,50. Besides its function in the APR (reducing oxidative damage by binding hemoglobin released during hemolysis and immunomodulatory effects), haptoglobin inhibits bacterial growth23. Additionally, it has an important role in the anti-fungal defense of hibernating bats42,51,52. Haptoglobin levels may have been elevated after capture and handling in all individuals; in a previous study where M. myotis were housed for 5 months prior to the experiment, pre-injection levels were much lower than in our study42. The decrease of haptoglobin levels in the control group during the experiment may reflect the reduction of stress after habituating to the captive conditions.
Acute phase response to LPS
The injection of LPS was associated with a change in the relative numbers of neutrophils (increase) and lymphocytes (decrease). A comparison with other studies is difficult because studies differed in experimental conditions, e.g. dosage, time of injection, and species used. Our dose was lower compared with the majority of those previously used for bats (see Table 1)29,44,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60, but apparently sufficient to elicit an APR as indicated by the shift from lymphocytes to neutrophils following injection and increase in haptoglobin levels (see below). Further studies are needed to better understand whether the quality (e.g. how many and which type of components activated) and the quantity of APR in bats is dose-dependent and how this explains the intra- and interspecific differences observed. Taking into account the circadian dynamics of the immune response61, results from other studies may differ from ours due to differences in the time of injection. For example, individuals of a closely related species, fish-eating bat (Myotis vivesi), were injected in the morning46, when bats naturally go into the dormancy phase, whereas we did during night (most active phase). Moreover, the different environmental conditions and life-history traits of species could further explain the differences in the outcome of APR to LPS injection in various bat species. Although all studied species were free-ranging, they largely differed in feeding ecology, colony size, roost conditions and geographic range, factors with known effect on immunity34,45,62,63,64. Therefore, each species may have adapted to specific challenges of pathogens, which is rather surprising since this response is well conserved among different taxa. In Table 1, we summarized the current knowledge on immune indices upon LPS challenge in bats.
A simulated bacterial infection with LPS elicited an immune response in several vertebrate species (e.g. house sparrow32; great tit (Parus major)65; fish-eating bat54; Seba’s short-tailed fruit bat (Carollia perspicillata)44,66; Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus)53,67; African mole rats (Cryptomys hottentotus pretoriae)68; mice (Mus musculus) and humans27) although the number of immune and physiological markers measured varies between studies. Similar to Pallas’s mastiff bats (Molossus molossus)29, skin temperature was not affected by LPS treatment in greater mouse-eared bats. The lack of a fever response to LPS challenge in some bat species is contrasting with other vertebrate taxa and could be associated with the apparently unique absence of the PYHIN gene family in bats69. Translation of genes of the PYHIN family results in non-bat taxa in immune sensors that activate the inflammasome and/or interferon pathways69. Thus, some bat species may neither sense intracellular foreign DNA particles nor mount an (innate) immune response in the same way as other vertebrates. However, LPS challenged Egyptian53, short-tailed59 and great fruit-eating bats (Artibeus lituratus)56 and fish-eating bats46 showed a febrile response. Additionally, fever was documented in great fruit-eating bats during mimicked viral infection43 (see below), while febrile cytokine IL-6 was significantly expressed in hibernating little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) infected with P. destructans70 which might lead to fever71. Fever can lead to an increase in the metabolic rate and thus may result in the loss of body mass46. The loss of body mass can also be related to elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines that trigger protein and energy mobilization to allow increased body temperature, thus reducing fat stores and muscle tissue72,73.
Yet, fever and body mass loss in response to LPS injection are not stringently correlated. For example, in house sparrows the immune response to LPS injection included nocturnal hyperthermia, but no change in body mass36. In Pallas’s mastiff bats, body mass decreased upon LPS challenge, but body temperature was not affected29. In Pallas’s long-tongued bats (Glossophaga soricina), house sparrows and white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii) body mass decreased upon LPS challenge, but temperature was not assessed32,35,58. In the wrinkled-lipped bat (Chaerephon plicatus), LPS injection was not associated with body mass loss, although this finding may be related to the relatively short study period of 8 hours57 compared with the other studies (11–24 h, see Table 1). In summary, the depletion of somatic resources upon mimicked bacterial infection may be context-dependent (environmental factors and other life-history traits) and not consistent among species.
A loss in body mass can be related to other factors besides fever. Firstly, antigen-induced sickness behaviour can lower the appetite of individuals (anorexia), resulting in reduced food consumption53. Secondly, immune challenges are metabolically costly28 and thus a decrease in body mass may reflect the mobilization of energy reserves to fuel the immune response, e.g. as shown in leukocytosis. Indeed, leukocyte counts increased after injection with LPS in great tits65, short-tailed fruit bats44, common vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus)60 and wrinkle-lipped free-tailed bats57. However, in our study on greater mouse-eared bats, in Egyptian fruit bats, Pallas’s mastiff bats and great fruit-eating bats, no evidence for a cellular immune reaction reflected by total leukocyte counts was found in response to the LPS challenge29,53,56.
Like in Egyptian fruit bats, short-tailed fruit bats and common vampire bats, we observed an increase in the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in greater mouse-eared bats following LPS challenge53,59,60,66. In wrinkle-lipped free-tailed bats, LPS injected animals also showed an increase in neutrophils, but no significant change in lymphocyte or monocyte numbers57.
Similarly to previous bat studies measuring haptoglobin levels after LPS injection53,55,67, we also observed a rise in this acute phase protein in greater mouse-eared bats. Haptoglobin can be considered a major acute phase protein in bats, which is due to its relatively low energetic cost it is mainly activated during periods with high energy demand such as migration55 or hibernation42. In contrast to a study on red crossbills (Loxia curvirostra) who found significantly elevated levels of BKA in LPS injected birds74, the BKA in greater mouse-eared bats was not associated with this immune challenge. Overall, the reaction to an LPS challenge seems to vary interspecifically even among species of the same taxon.
Acute phase response to PolyI:C
In contrast to our prediction, the challenge of PolyI:C caused an increase in the relative numbers of neutrophils and decrease in the relative number of lymphocytes in our study. We predicted no effect since it has been shown that bats have a constitutive expression of the interferon type I (IFN α and β) with antiviral activity17. Neutrophils are part of the first line innate immune defence and are the main phagocytic leukocyte type21. These phagocytes kill pathogens (including viruses) either by engulfing and subsequently digesting them in a phagosom, by secretion of different antimicrobial substances or with neutrophil extracellular traps75. Neutrophils proliferate after infection, stress and inflammation21,76. Consistent with the study on house sparrows36, we did not find an effect of PolyI:C injection on body mass, skin temperature and haptoglobin. However, in a recent study, great fruit-eating bats were challenged by a lower dosage of PolyI:C43. Animals injected with this antigen not only increased their resting metabolic rate 6 h post injection, but also lost more body weight compared to the control animals and showed an increase in body temperature43. Moreover, there were no differences between treatment groups at 24 h post injection, indicating a quick response towards viral antigens in this bat species. Since we assessed most APR markers 24 h and 48 h post injection, we might have missed such a response, an aspect which needs to be studied in the future.
Acute phase response to zymosan
The injection of zymosan resulted in no immune response in our study which is consistent with the study on house sparrows, were no APR towards zymosan was found36; however this outcome is strikingly different from the results of a recent study on hibernating greater mouse-eared bats42.When injected with the similar dosage of zymosan, hibernating greater mouse-eared bats increased the circulating levels of haptoglobin compared with control animals42. This result is not only surprising since immune functions are usually down regulated during hibernation77, but also due to the opposing results observed between active and torpid individuals.
Conclusions
Despite our predictions to find no APR to viral, but to fungal and bacterial challenges, we found a reaction to the viral and the bacterial antigens. However, it is noteworthy that other proteins, e.g. from other fungi or gram-positive bacteria, might elicit an APR differently than those used in this study. Additionally, the route of administration of the antigen may play a role in the initiation of an APR. Whereas we injected the antigens subcutaneously, natural infections usually occur via other routes (e.g. oro-fecal, respiratory).
Remarkably, none of the antigens elicited a fever response. Thus, we confirm our hypothesis and add to the observation that bats, depending on their ecological niche, may have adapted to not react with an APR to certain infections and/or respond with adjusted defense mechanisms42,52,55. Possibly, the benefits of fighting certain pathogens do not outweigh the costs of self-defense (energetic and pathological). Consequently, it may not be adaptive for bats to raise an immune response to all pathogens in a similar way. Future studies could investigate the molecular pathways in more detail using new tools51,70,78,79,80 both in vitro and in vivo. For example, the effect of antigen challenges on the expression and secretion of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines should be studied to better understand the underlying molecular mechanisms of the immune defense in bats, especially towards different pathogen groups.
Methods
Experimental setup
In August 2015, we captured 38 non-lactating adult female greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis) at the Orlova Chuka cave, using harp traps, in cooperation with the bat research station in Tabachka, Bulgaria, administered by Dr. H. Goerlitz (Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany). We chose the greater mouse-eared bat as model species because its size (20–30 g) allowed us to repeatedly take sufficiently large blood samples. Work was granted under the permit 639/28.05.2015 issued by the Directorate of the Rusenski Lom Nature Park (Direktor Tsonka Hristova), Bulgaria. We housed bats individually in plastic boxes where we fed them daily with mealworms and provided water ad libitum. The experiment started after the bats had been allowed to habituate for about 36 h. To trigger APRs, we used three pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) to mimic bacterial, fungal and viral infections: LPS (an endotoxin of gram-negative bacteria cell walls), zymosan (a fungal glucan) and polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (PolyI:C, a synthetic double-stranded RNA). We assigned individuals randomly to the four experimental groups (LPS: n = 9, zymosan: n = 10, PolyI:C: n = 9 and saline solution as a control: n = 10). We compared indices of the APR (number and type of leukocytes, haptoglobin concentration, fever, change in body mass) and the overall function of the constitutive innate immunity via bacterial killing activity of plasma between 4 groups of bats either injected with LPS, PolyI:C, zymosan or saline solution as a control (see below). Most of the previous studies measured the APR within 24 h post-injection period29,44, so in order to elucidate potential long-term responses in bats, we followed the animals for 48 h53.
We equipped bats with temperature-sensitive radiotransmitters (LB-2XT, Holohil Systems Ltd., Carp, ON, Canada) which emit signal pulse rates as a function of the animal’s skin temperature. We used an Australis 26 k scanning receiver, an omni-directional antenna, and a Titley Scientific RF data logger to automatically record the transmitter pulse rates which correspond to skin temperatures of individual bats throughout the duration of the experiment. The skin temperature is a reliable proxy of body temperature in torpid and active bats53,81. To attach the radio transmitters, we first removed a tuft of fur from the interscapular region and then glued the radio transmitter with medical skin glue (Manfred Sauer GmbH, Germany) onto the furless skin.
Before applying the challenge, we weighed bats and collected a blood sample of about 70 µl using heparinised capillaries from each individual. We used 3 µl of blood to produce a smear for total and differential leukocyte counts (see below). We centrifuged the remaining blood to separate plasma from cellular components and froze both fractions in a dry shipper at − 196 °C until being transported to Germany, where samples were stored at − 80 °C until further analysis. We injected the different solutions subcutaneously using a sterile disposable syringe (no. 00531, Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) between 8 pm and midnight. Animals from the LPS group received 30 µl of LPS (Escherichia coli, no. L2630, Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) in saline solution resulting in a concentration of 1 mg/kg body mass. The zymosan group received 21 µl of zymosan (no. 58856-93-2, Invivogen, Tolouse, France) in saline solution, in a dosage of 0.7 mg/kg body mass, the PolyI:C group 190 µl of PolyI:C (no. 31852-29-6, Invivogen, Tolouse, France) in saline solution, in a dosage of 25 mg/kg body mass and the control group 80 µl of sterile saline solution. These dosages were selected because they have been successfully used before in a similarly sized bird species, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus)36.
We weighed the bats and collected from each a second and third blood sample 24 and 48 h p.i. (procedure of preparing and storing samples as before). After 48 h, we removed radio transmitters and after confirming a good health status we released all bats at the site of capture.
Bacterial killing activity (BKA)
The BKA is a constitutive innate marker of the immune system and measures humoral and cellular components in function of the sample used. While using whole blood is possible to quantify the overall constitutive innate immunity of an individual82, with serum or plasma samples only the humoral part is measured83,84. We assessed the bacterial killing activity (BKA) of the plasma against E. coli in vitro following the method of Schneeberger et al.62. Plasma samples were diluted 1:50 in sterile PBS and we added 10 µl of a suspension of living E. coli (ATCC #8739) to each diluted sample (140 µl). The bacterial suspension was adjusted to a concentration of ~ 200 colonies per 50 µl plasma-bacteria mixture. The mixtures were then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. After incubation, 50 µl aliquot of the vortexed mixture was spread onto Tryptic Soy Agar plates in duplicate, followed by overnight incubation at 37 °C. To obtain the initial number of bacteria that we had before starting to interact with the plasma, we diluted 140 µl PBS with bacterial suspension and plated in similar ways. On the following day, the colony-forming units were counted and the bacterial killing activity was defined as percent of the killed bacteria, which was calculated as 1-(average of viable bacteria after incubation / the initial number of bacteria)62.
Haptoglobin
Haptoglobin is an acute phase protein that usually occurs at low concentrations, but production and secretion is increased in response to acute infection and trauma, including in bats23,42,50,53,67. As an acute phase protein, haptoglobin reduces oxidative damage by binding hemoglobin released during hemolysis, has immunomodulatory effects and inhibits bacterial growth. To measure the concentration of haptoglobin, we followed the standard procedure of the commercial kit "PHASE" ™ Haptoglobin Assay (Cat. No. TP-801, Tridelta, Maynooth, Ireland) using a colorimetric assay42,53,55.
Total and differential leukocyte counts
Total and differential leukocyte (white blood cell) counts are considered to be indicators of health status, current infectious processes, stress and trauma76,85. Neutrophils are the first line of the innate defense against pathogens and parasites; their number increases especially during bacterial and fungal infections. Lymphocytes are the cellular effector of the adaptive immune system, their number increases mainly in viral infections. Monocytes, eosinophils and basophils are minor leukocyte types, with specific functions as phagocytic cells, antiparasitic defense and allergy.
We stained blood smears with May-Gruenwald’s solution (no T863.2, Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and Giemsa (no. T862.1, Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). Blood smears were analyzed with a microscope under oil immersion at a 100 × magnification. Blood smears were analyzed blindly and conducted by the same person. We estimated the total leukocyte counts manually by the mean number of white blood cells per visual field using the total count of immune cells in 10 fields62. The number of leukocytes obtained by this method corelates with numbers obtained by conventional methods62.
For the differential leukocyte counts, we counted 100 leukocytes and identified the different types of immune cells by size, color, shape and cytoplasmic contents. From this, we calculated relative numbers (%) of lymphocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes and basophils. Further on, we exclusively consider lymphocytes, neutrophils and monocytes in the comparison between treatments because eosinophils and basophils occurred at very low concentrations in the blood (mean of 3% and 7%, respectively).
Ethical approval
All experimental procedures described in the materials and methods section were approved by the Internal Committee for Ethics and Animal Welfare of the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (permit #2015-03-05). All experiments were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines of the IZW and comply with the laws of Bulgaria. The reporting in the study follows the recommendations in the ARRIVE guidelines.
Statistics
We used the statistical software R version 3.5.1 for all statistical analyses86. We conducted two-tailed tests and set the level of significance to α = 0.05. We pooled the data of skin temperature to 4-h intervals for analyses. We used a linear mixed-effects model using the package “lme4”87 with temperature as response variable. We included treatment (control, LPS, PolyI:C, zymosan), time since injection (4-h intervals) and their interaction as predictor variables. Additionally, we included the identity of the bats as a random variable to control for inter-individual differences. We analyzed the model using an ANOVA (Type I).
For all other response variables (body mass, BKA, haptoglobin, total leukocyte counts, relative number of monocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes), we analyzed the data also using the package “lme4” using linear mixed-effects models. The response variable was the difference in the measured value at 24 or 48 h, respectively, compared with the value before injection. For the response variables total leukocyte counts and haptoglobin (mg/ml), we transformed the response variable using Box-Cox power transformation to improve model assumptions (normal distribution of residuals, normal distribution of random intercepts and homogeneity of variance) using the function “powerTransform” of the R package “car”88. The predictor variables were time of sampling (24 and 48 h p.i.), treatment and their interaction. Additionally, we included the identity of the bats as a random variable to control for inter-individual differences. In case that treatment or the interaction between treatment and sampling time did not have a significant effect on the response variable, we removed it from the model to improve model interpretation. In case that there was a significant effect of treatment or the interaction between treatment and sampling time we applied a Tukey’s post-hoc test to compare factor levels with p-value adjustment in the R package “multcomp”89.
Before these analyses, we tested if measurements in individuals differed before injection across the four treatment groups using a LRT of two linear mixed effects model assuming a gaussian (body mass, haptoglobin) or poisson distribution (BKA, total leukocyte counts, relative number of monocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes), respectively, whereas we compared a null model with the model including treatment as fixed effect, respectively. We included individual identity as a random factor only in the BKA models because this was the only measurement where we had two data points for each sample.
Data availability
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Change history
07 December 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25685-2
References
Wibbelt, G., Moore, M. S., Schountz, T. & Voigt, C. C. Emerging diseases in Chiroptera: Why bats?. Biol. Let. 6, 438–440 (2010).
Gonzalez, V. & Banerjee, A. Molecular, ecological, and behavioural drivers of the bat-virus relationship. iScience 25, 104779 (2022).
Brook, C. E. & Dobson, A. P. Bats as ‘special’reservoirs for emerging zoonotic pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 23, 172–180 (2015).
Kosoy, M. et al. Bartonella spp. in bats, Kenya. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16, 1875–1881 (2010).
Becker, D. J. et al. Livestock abundance predicts vampire bat demography, immune profiles and bacterial infection risk. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 373, 20170089 (2018).
Muehldorfer, K. Bats and bacterial pathogens: A review. Zoonoses Public Health 60, 93–103 (2013).
Taylor, M. L. et al. Geographical distribution of genetic polymorphism of the pathogen Histoplasma capsulatum isolated from infected bats, captured in a central zone of Mexico. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 45, 451–458 (2005).
Schaer, J. et al. High diversity of West African bat malaria parasites and a tight link with rodent Plasmodium taxa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 17415–17419 (2013).
Evans, N., Bown, K., Timofte, D., Simpson, V. & Birtles, R. Fatal borreliosis in bat caused by relapsing fever spirochete, United Kingdom. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15, 1331–1333 (2009).
Muehldorfer, K., Speck, S. & Wibbelt, G. Diseases in free-ranging bats from Germany. BMC Vet. Res. 7, 61 (2011).
Muehldorfer, K., Wibbelt, G., Haensel, J., Riehm, J. & Speck, S. Yersinia species isolated from bats, Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16, 578–581 (2010).
Blehert, D. S. et al. Bat white-nose syndrome: An emerging fungal pathogen?. Science 323, 227–227 (2009).
Barlow, A., Jolliffe, T., Tomlin, M., Worledge, L. & Miller, H. Mycotic dermatitis in a vagrant parti-coloured bat (Vespertilio murinus) in Great Britain. Vet. Rec. 169, 614–614 (2011).
Simpson, V. R., Borman, A. M., Fox, R. I. & Mathews, F. Cutaneous mycosis in a Barbastelle bat (Barbastella barbastellus) caused by Hyphopichia burtonii. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 25, 551–554 (2013).
Frick, W. F. et al. An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common North American bat species. Science 329, 679–682 (2010).
Hecht-Höger, A. et al. Plasma proteomic profiles differ between European and North American myotid bats colonized by Pseudogymnoascus destructans. Mol. Ecol. 29, 1745–1755 (2020).
Baker, M., Schountz, T. & Wang, L. F. Antiviral immune responses of bats: A review. Zoonoses Public Health 60, 104–116 (2013).
Baker, M. L. & Zhou, P. in Bats and Viruses Vol. 1 (eds Lin-Fa Wang & Christopher Cowled) Ch. 14, 327–348 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015).
Wang, L.-F., Walker, P. J. & Poon, L. L. M. Mass extinctions, biodiversity and mitochondrial function: Are bats ‘special’ as reservoirs for emerging viruses?. Curr. Opin. Virol. 1, 649–657 (2011).
Lee, K. A. Linking immune defenses and life history at the levels of the individual and the species. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 1000–1015 (2006).
Murphy, K. Janeway’s Immunobiology 8th edn. (Garland Science, 2012).
Gruys, E., Toussaint, M., Niewold, T. & Koopmans, S. Acute phase reaction and acute phase proteins. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B Biomed. Biotechnol. 6, 1045–1056 (2005).
Cray, C., Zaias, J. & Altman, N. H. Acute phase response in animals: A review. Comp. Med. 59, 517–526 (2009).
Hart, B. L. Biological basis of the behavior of sick animals. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 12, 123–137 (1988).
Owen-Ashley, N. T. & Wingfield, J. C. Acute phase responses of passerine birds: Characterization and seasonal variation. J. Ornithol. 148, S583–S591 (2007).
Kozak, W., Conn, C. A. & Kluger, M. J. Lipopolysaccharide induces fever and depresses locomotor-activity in unrestrained mice. Am. J. Physiol. 266, R125–R135 (1994).
Copeland, S. et al. Acute inflammatory response to endotoxin in mice and humans. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 12, 60–67 (2005).
Evans, S. S., Repasky, E. A. & Fisher, D. T. Fever and the thermal regulation of immunity: The immune system feels the heat. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 335–349 (2015).
Stockmaier, S., Dechmann, D. K. N., Page, R. A. & Teague O’Mara, M. No fever and leucocytosis in response to a lipopolysaccharide challenge in an insectivorous bat. Biol. Let. 11, 20150576 (2015).
Martin, L. B., Scheuerlein, A. & Wikelski, M. Immune activity elevates energy expenditure of house sparrows: A link between direct and indirect costs?. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 153–158 (2003).
Sheldon, B. C. & Verhulst, S. Ecological immunology: Costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 317–321 (1996).
Bonneaud, C. et al. Assessing the cost of mounting an immune response. Am. Nat. 161, 367–379 (2003).
Audebert, H. J., Pellkofer, T. S., Wimmer, M. L. & Haberl, R. L. Progression in lacunar stroke is related to elevated acute phase parameters. Eur. Neurol. 51, 125–131 (2004).
Lee, K. A., Martin, L. B. & Wikelski, M. C. Responding to inflammatory challenges is less costly for a successful avian invader, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus), than its less-invasive congener. Oecologia 145, 244–251 (2005).
Owen-Ashley, N. T., Turner, M., Hahn, T. P. & Wingfield, J. C. Hormonal, behavioral, and thermoregulatory responses to bacterial lipopolysaccharide in captive and free-living white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii). Horm. Behav. 49, 15–29 (2006).
Coon, C. A. C., Warne, R. W. & Martin, L. B. Acute-phase responses vary with pathogen identity in house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 300, R1418–R1425 (2011).
Kimura, M. et al. Comparison of acute phase responses induced in rabbits by lipopolysaccharide and double-stranded RNA. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 267, R1596–R1605 (1994).
Gomez, C. R., Goral, J., Ramirez, L., Kopf, M. & Kovacs, E. J. Aberrant acute-phase response in aged interleukin-6 knockout mice. Shock 25, 581–585 (2006).
Barrientos, R. M., Watkins, L. R., Rudy, J. W. & Maier, S. F. Characterization of the sickness response in young and aging rats following E. coli infection. Brain Behav Immun. 23, 450–454 (2009).
Sköld-Chiriac, S., Nord, A., Tobler, M., Nilsson, J. -Å. & Hasselquist, D. Body temperature changes during simulated bacterial infection in a songbird: Fever at night and hypothermia during the day. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 2961–2969 (2015).
Sköld-Chiriac, S., Nord, A., Nilsson, J. -Å. & Hasselquist, D. Physiological and behavioral responses to an acute-phase response in zebra finches: Immediate and short-term effects. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 87, 288–298 (2014).
Fritze, M. et al. Immune response of hibernating European bats to a fungal challenge. Biol. Open 8, bio046078 (2019).
Triana-Llanos, C., Guerrero-Chacón, A. L., Rivera-Ruíz, D., Rojas-Díaz, V. & Niño-Castro, A. The acute phase response elicited by a viral-like molecular pattern increases energy expenditure in Artibeus lituratus. Biologia 74, 667–673 (2019).
Schneeberger, K., Czirják, G. Á. & Voigt, C. C. Inflammatory challenge increases measures of oxidative stress in a free-ranging, long-lived mammal. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 4514–4519 (2013).
Allen, L. C. et al. Roosting ecology and variation in adaptive and innate immune system function in the Brazilian free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis). J. Comp. Physiol. B. 179, 315–323 (2009).
Otálora-Ardila, A., Herrera, M. L. G., Flores-Martínez, J. J. & Welch, K. C. Jr. Metabolic cost of the activation of immune response in the fish-eating myotis (Myotis vivesi): The effects of inflammation and the acute phase response. PLoS ONE 11, e0164938 (2016).
Ohmer, M. E. B. et al. Applied ecoimmunology: Using immunological tools to improve conservation efforts in a changing world. Conserv. Physiol. 9, coab074 (2021).
Becker, D. J., Seifert, S. N. & Carlson, C. J. Beyond infection: Intergrating competence into reservoir host prediction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, P1062–P1065 (2020).
Kacprzyk, J. et al. A potent anti-inflammatory response in bat macrophages may be linked to extended longevity and viral tolerance. Acta Chiropterologica 19, 219–228 (2017).
Langlois, M. R. & Delanghe, J. R. Biological and clinical significance of haptoglobin polymorphism in humans. Clin. Chem. 42, 1589–1600 (1996).
Field, K. A. et al. The white-nose syndrome transcriptome: activation of anti-fungal host responses in wing tissue of hibernating little brown myotis. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1005168 (2015).
Fritze, M. et al. Determinants of defence strategies of a hibernating European bat species towards the fungal pathogen Pseudogymnoascus destructans. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 119, 104017 (2021).
Moreno, K. et al. Sick bats stay home alone: Fruit bats practice social distancing when faced with an immunological challenge. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1505, 178–190 (2021).
Otálora-Ardila, A., Herrera, M. L. G., Flores-Martínez, J. J. & Welch, K. C. Jr. The effect of short-term food restriction on the metabolic cost of the acute phase response in the fish-eating Myotis (Myotis vivesi). Mamm. Biol. 82, 41–47 (2017).
Voigt, C. C. et al. The immune response of bats differs between pre-migration and migration seasons. Sci. Rep. 10, 17384 (2020).
Guerrero-Chacón, A. L., Rivera-Ruíz, D., Rojas-Díaz, V., Triana-Llanos, C. & Niño-Castro, A. Metabolic cost of acute phase response in the frugivorous bat, Artibeus lituratus. Mamm. Res. 63, 397–404 (2018).
Weise, P., Czirják, G. Á., Lindecke, O., Bumrungsri, S. & Voigt, C. C. Simulated bacterial infection disrupts the circadian fluctuation of immune cells in wrinkle-lipped bats (Chaerephon plicatus). PeerJ 5, e3570 (2017).
Cabrera-Martínez, L. V., Herrera, M. L. G. & Cruz-Neto, A. P. The energetic cost of mounting an immune response for Pallas’s long-tongued bat (Glossophaga soricina). PeerJ 6, e4627 (2018).
Cabrera-Martinez, L. V., Herrera, M. L. G. & Cruz-Neto, A. P. Food restriction, but not seasonality, modulates the acute phase response of a neotropical bat. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 229, 93–100 (2019).
Stockmaier, S., Bolnick, D. I., Page, R. A. & Carter, G. G. An immune challenge reduces social grooming in vampire bats. Anim. Behav. 140, 141–149 (2018).
Scheiermann, C., Kunisaki, Y. & Frenette, P. S. Circadian control of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 190–198 (2013).
Schneeberger, K., Czirják, G. Á. & Voigt, C. C. Measures of the constitutive immune system are linked to diet and roosting habits of Neotropical bats. PLoS ONE 8, e54023 (2013).
Hasselquist, D. Comparative immunoecology in birds: Hypotheses and tests. J. Ornithol. 148, 571–582 (2007).
Becker, D. J. et al. Leukocyte profiles reflect geographic range limits and local food abundance in a widespread Neotropical bat. Integr. Comp. Biol. 59, 1176–1189 (2019).
Vermeulen, A., Eens, M., Zaid, E. & Müller, W. Baseline innate immunity does not affect the response to an immune challenge in female great tits (Parus major). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70, 585–592 (2016).
Melhado, G., Herrera, M. L. G. & Cruz-Neto, A. P. Bats respond to simulated bacterial infection during the active phase by reducing food intake. J. Exp. Zool. A 333, 536–542 (2020).
Costantini, D. et al. Induced bacterial sickness causes inflammation but not blood oxidative stress in Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus). Conserv. Physiol. 10, coac028 (2022).
Viljoen, H., Bennett, N. C. & Lutermann, H. Life-history traits, but not season, affect the febrile response to a lipopolysaccharide challenge in highveld mole-rats. J. Zool. 285, 222–229 (2011).
Ahn, M., Cui, J., Irving, A. T. & Wang, L. F. Unique loss of the PYHIN gene family in bats amongst mammals: Implications for inflammasome sensing. Sci. Rep. 6, 21722 (2016).
Lilley, T. et al. Immune responses in hibernating little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) with white-nose syndrome. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 284, 20162232 (2017).
Mayberry, H. W., McGuire, L. P. & Willis, C. K. Body temperatures of hibernating little brown bats reveal pronounced behavioural activity during deep torpor and suggest a fever response during white-nose syndrome. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 188, 333–343 (2018).
Watkins, L. R., Maier, S. F. & Goehler, L. E. Immune activation: The role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in inflammation, illness responses and pathological pain states. Pain 63, 289–302 (1995).
Grimble, R. F. Interaction between nutrients, pro-inflammatory cytokines and inflammation. Clin. Sci. 91, 121–130 (1996).
Schultz, E. M., Hahn, T. P. & Klasing, K. C. Photoperiod but not food restriction modulates innate immunity in an opportunistic breeder, Loxia curvirostra. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 722–730 (2016).
Brinkmann, V. & Zychlinsky, A. Neutrophil extracellular traps: Is immunity the second function of chromatin?. J. Cell Biol. 198, 773–783 (2012).
Davis, A. K., Maney, D. L. & Maerz, J. C. The use of leukocyte profiles to measure stress in vertebrates: A review for ecologists. Funct. Ecol. 22, 760–772 (2008).
Bouma, H. R., Carey, H. V. & Kroese, F. G. Hibernation: The immune system at rest?. J. Leukoc. Biol. 88, 619–624 (2010).
Crameri, G. et al. Establishment, immortalisation and characterisation of pteropid bat cell lines. PLoS ONE 4, e8266 (2009).
Neely, B. A. et al. Surveying the vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) serum proteome: A resource for identifying immunological proteins and detecting pathogens. J. Proteome Res. 20, 2547–2559 (2021).
Hecht, A. M. et al. Plasma proteomic analysis of active and torpid greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis). Sci. Rep. 5, 16604 (2015).
Barclay, R. M. R. et al. Can external radiotransmitters be used to assess body temperature and torpor in bats?. J. Mammal. 77, 1102–1106 (1996).
Pap, P. L., Czirják, G. Á., Vágási, C. I., Barta, Z. & Hasselquist, D. Sexual dimorphism in immune function changes during the annual cycle in house sparrows. Naturwissenschaften 97, 891–901 (2010).
Heinrich, S. K. et al. Feliform carnivores have a distinguished constitutive innate immune response. Biol. Open 5, 550–555 (2016).
Heinrich, S. K. et al. Cheetahs have a stronger constitutive innate immunity than leopards. Sci. Rep. 7, 44837 (2017).
Morell, V., Lundgren, E. & Gillott, A. Predicting severity of trauma by admission white blood cell count, serum potassium level, and arterial pH. South. Med. J. 86, 658–659 (1993).
R Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R foundation for statistical computing, 2018).
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S. & Sarkar, D. Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version 3, 57 (2007).
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. An R Companion to Applied Regression (SAGE, 2011).
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F. & Westfall, P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom. J. 50, 346–363 (2008).
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to the Directorate of the Rusenski Lom Nature Park (Director Tsonka Hristova) for cooperation and support. We thank the responsible Bulgarian authorities (MOEW-Sofia and RIOSV-Ruse) for granting us permission to conduct this research. We would like to thank Stefan Greif for his support in capturing bats in Bulgaria and Katja Pohle for her help in the laboratory analyses. This work was supported by institutional funds of the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research and the German Research Foundation (DFG Priority Programme 1596). Funding for the research station in Tabachka was provided by the DFG to Holger R. Goerlitz (Emmy Noether Program GO2091/2-1).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The publication of this article was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - project number 491292795.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.C.V. and G.Á.C. designed the study. S.A.T. and J.S. conducted the experiment and collected the samples. G.Á.C., M.F. and A.S. carried out laboratory work. L.D.B., A.S. and G.Á.C. conducted statistical analyses of the data. All authors discussed the results, wrote the manuscript, read and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained an error in the Acknowledgements section. Additionally, the Funding section in the original version of this Article was incomplete. Full information regarding the corrections made can be found in the correction for this Article.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Seltmann, A., Troxell, S.A., Schad, J. et al. Differences in acute phase response to bacterial, fungal and viral antigens in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis). Sci Rep 12, 15259 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18240-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18240-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.