Abstract
Firearm related mortality in the USA surpassed all other developed countries. This study hypothesizes that injury patterns, weapon type, and mortality differ between suicide groups as opposed to homicide. The American College of Surgeons National Trauma Database was queried from January 2017 to December 2019. All firearm related injuries were included, and weapon type was abstracted. Differences between homicide and suicide groups by sex, age, race, and injury severity were compared using a Mann–Whitney test for numerical data and Fisher’s exact test for categorical data. The association between weapon type and mortality relative to suicide as opposed to homicide was assessed in Fisher’s exact tests. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. There were 100,031 homicide and 11,714 suicide subjects that met inclusion criteria. Homicides were mostly assault victims (97.6%), male (88%), African–American (62%), had less severe injury (mean (ISS) 12.07) and a median age of 20 years old (IQR: 14, 30, p < 0.01). Suicides were mostly male (83%), white (79%), had more severe injury (mean ISS 20.73), and a median age of 36 years old (IQR: 19, 54, p < 0.01). Suicide group had higher odds of head/neck (OR = 13.6) or face (OR = 5.7) injuries, with lower odds of injury to chest (OR = 0.55), abdominal or pelvic contents (OR = 0.25), extremities or pelvic girdle (OR = 0.15), or superficial soft tissue (OR = 0.32). Mortality rate was higher for suicide group (44.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 43.9%, 45.7%) compared to the homicide group (11.5%; 95% CI 11.3%, 11.7%). Suicide had higher mortality, more severe injuries, and more head/neck/facial injuries than homicide. Majority of suicides were with handguns.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Firearm related injury is a complex public health issue worldwide. While firearm death rates declined from 2003 to 2015 among most high-income countries, the United States (US) death rates increased from 10.2 to 11.2 per 100,000 people1. In 2015, the overall US firearm death rate was 11.4 times higher than 28 other high income countries combined, thereby giving the US the highest rates of firearm homicide, firearm suicide, and unintentional firearm related deaths per 100,00 people1. Firearm homicide and suicide are among the top ten causes of injury deaths in the US. In 2018 there were 38,390 firearm deaths, with 24,432 firearms suicide (50.5% of all suicides) and 13,958 firearm homicides (74.1% of all homicides) which, combined, surpassed unintentional falls and motor vehicle collisions. In 2019, firearm homicide and suicide was the leading cause of violence-related injury death among persons 15–34 years of age2. Suicide and homicide accounted for 8.1% and 5.1% years of potential life lost, respectively, before the age of 65 in 20192.
Firearm injuries may be preventable, however, the issues are multi-faceted. Violence by firearm occurs in a variety of ways and can have a lasting effect on the community suffering that violence3,4,5,6,7,8. Survivors of firearm injuries can be witnesses, responders, family, and of course the injured. As clinicians, we have a particular opportunity to affect the patient and communities we serve in both primary and secondary prevention9,10. Access to firearms and inadvertent discharge have been readily discussed in the literature as well as the strategy of primary prevention by way of “means safety”6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. This has been reported as having an indirect effect15,16 and combined with media reporting practices as primary prevention strategies, are outside the realm of healthcare clinicians. Primary prevention strategies that can be affected by clinicians such as community awareness programs, crisis intervention, and access to appropriate healthcare services have shown direct benefits, per the World Health Organization and several multicenter studies9.
Secondary prevention practices involving direct care to the injured by “gatekeepers”9 to treat the acute traumatic injury as well as provide “physical, psychological, and emotional safety” and “a sense of control and empowerment”8. Intentional firearm injury that does not immediately lead to death, whether they die as an inpatient or survive to discharge, comes with significant morbidity, recovery, and impact on social and interpersonal needs of the patient. Failed suicide attempt, non-suicidal self-harm, assault, and injury as a result of law enforcement/military/war actions impart a burden on healthcare and community resources. In an attempt to advance injury prevention practices we seek to gather, analyze, and disseminate data on the nature and extent of the problem. This study seeks to compare the differences in population, substance use, injury patterns, weapon type, and in-hospital mortality between suicide and homicide groups that survive to reach trauma centers for care using a large nationally reported trauma database. As direct patient healthcare providers we can identify those patients that could benefit from additional resources with multidisciplinary medical care and community resources in addition to treating the primary injury.
Methods
A retrospective study from January 2017 to December 2019 was performed using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Trauma Data Bank (NDTB)35. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. This study does not require any approval by an Institutional Review Board as the NTDB contains only publically available, de-identified data compiled from millions of electronic records out of hundreds of trauma centers across the US. The NTDB collects data from patients who present to all level I and level II trauma centers. Level III and IV trauma centers can participate in the data bank voluntarily. All data are de-identified and aggregated, and searchable through the American College of Surgeons. With more than 7.5 million electronic records, the NTDB is the world’s largest trauma data repository36 and the most robust source of clinical information for firearms injury37.
All firearm related injuries and weapon type were abstracted using ICD-10 codes (W32-W34.XXX Firearm injury: Unintentional (unintentional shooting, fatal or non-fatal), X72-74.XXX Firearm injury: Self-harm (gun suicide, attempted or completed), X93-X95.XXX Firearm injury: Assault (gun homicide, attempted or completed), Y22-24.XXX Firearm injury: Undetermined intent (unknown cause, fatal or non-fatal), Y35.XXX Firearm injury: Justifiable shooting (legal intervention, fatal or non-fatal), Y36.4XX Firearm injury: War operations (war shooting, fatal or non-fatal). Division of groups were made for comparison simplicity with ‘Homicide’ including firearm injuries inflicted onto the patient, and ‘Suicide’ including firearm injuries that were purposely self-inflicted.
The demographic information and injury severity of homicide and suicide groups were compared using a Mann–Whitney test for numerical data and Fisher’s exact test for categorical data. Logistic regression was used to determine the ways that injury location, injury type/severity, and detected drugs were associated with suicide as opposed to homicide. The association between weapon type and mortality relative to suicide as opposed to homicide was assessed in Fisher’s exact tests. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Consent for publication
All authors have read and approved final version of this work. No waiver of consent was necessary from patients as was de-identified data review.
Results
During the study period, 100,031 homicides and 11,714 suicides were identified. The homicide group was composed of individuals who were categorized as assault (n = 97,639), legal intervention (n = 2,303), military operations (n = 9), terrorism (n = 76), or war operations (n = 4). The suicide group included the Intentional Self-Harm categories as described above (n = 11,714). Accidental Discharge (n = 18,920), Accidental Malfunction (n = 397), and Undetermined Intent (2748) categories were not included since we were evaluating causes for intentional firearm injuries.
Demographics between the two groups differed in several ways. Median age for suicide subjects (36, Interquartile range (IQR): 19, 54) was 16 years older than for homicide subjects (20, IQR: 14, 30) (Table 1). African–American subjects made up 62% of the homicide group and only 10% of the suicide group. Asian, American Indian, and White subjects had higher percentages in the suicide group than the homicide group (Table 1). Males comprised the vast majority of both the homicide and suicide groups, 88% and 83%, respectively.
A comparison of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scores between both groups demonstrated more severe injuries within the suicide group (5, IQR: 3, 5) than the homicide group (3, IQR: 2, 3) (Table 1). Superficial soft tissue injuries were the most common pattern of injury between both groups (suicide 40%, homicide 67%), however, some significant differences emerged between the two groups (Table 2). Higher rates of injuries to the extremities or pelvic girdle were observed among homicide subjects (34% and 25% respectively, vs. 7% and 8% in suicides), while higher rates of injuries to the head or neck were observed among suicide subjects (67% vs. 13% in homicides). Considering head or neck injuries occurred most frequently among suicide subjects, a greater frequency (despite greater incidence in homicide) of a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 13 (19.9 vs. 4.2%), respiratory rate less than 10 or more than 29 (breaths per minute) (8.2% vs. 2.2%), having low systolic blood pressure (6.5% vs. 3.0%), and skull fracture (4.8% vs. 0.3%) would be expected in this group (Table 3). The homicide subjects had higher penetrating injuries indicative of multiple gunshot wounds, greater incidence (despite low overall frequencies) of long bone injury (86 vs. 2), crush injury (173 vs. 9), amputation (29 vs. 1), and paralysis (223 vs. 7).
Homicide and suicide group subjects also differed by substances found in their system (Table 4). Suicide subjects most commonly had no substances in their system (OR 2.27, 95% CI 2.16, 2.39). When illicit/recreational drugs were involved, suicide subjects were more likely to have barbiturates (OR 2.82, 95% CI 2.08, 3.81), benzodiazepines (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.47, 1.77), tricyclic antidepressants (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.53, 3.98), ecstasy (MDMA) (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.04, 2.46), or ‘other’ drugs (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05, 1.81) in their system. Illicit/recreational drugs such as amphetamines (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75, 0.92), cocaine (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60, 0.75), opioids (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62, 0.81), phencyclidine (PCP) (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33, 0.74), and cannabinoids (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.49, 0.56) were less likely observed in the suicide compared to the homicide group with the most common being cannabinoids.
In-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher (OR = 6.2, p < 0.001) within the suicide group (44.8%, 95% CI 43.9%, 45.7%) compared to the homicide group (11.5%, 95% CI 11.3%, 11.7%). Total in-hospital mortalities were still greater with homicides 11,544 versus 5249 indicating that despite greater mortality odds for suicide, burden still high with overall firearm homicide injury victims. Most homicide and suicide incidents involved a handgun or an unspecified firearm (Table 5). In the suicide group, overall in-hospital mortality rates were high, between 44 and 50% for firearms and handguns versus air guns and shotguns at 4–29% (Table 5). This is a stark contrast to the homicide group with an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 11.5% regardless of weapon type.
Discussion
This retrospective study adds to the body of literature concerning gunshot wounds by analyzing data from the NTDB from all trauma centers from within the country representing the highest rates of firearm deaths. In observing the data from patients who arrive to trauma centers alive, we might glean information that may direct us in helping those who can benefit from clinician intervention. Similar to previous publications, we found the suicide group comprised of mostly older white males. A mortality study performed by Branas et al. found most of the suicides were male, older (> 35 years), white, and at least half were unmarried38. Their homicide group was also comprised of younger, African–American males38. A study on gun violence by Manley et al. also discovered the majority of their patients injured with a documented firearm were African–American males, with a median age of 28, and aggravated assault as the most common circumstance39. A retrospective study on interpersonal violence at a Level I trauma center by Livingston et al. also found a significant and disproportionate representation by young African American males40. Suicides rates have been associated with white males and rural settings, with homicides rates having been associated with African–American males and urban settings, likely due to the urban–rural divide34,41. Urban environments have higher levels of income inequality, female-headed households, crowding41, crime, and higher nighttime activity with people coming and going38. Rural environments have greater daytime activity, lower traffic of those not living in that neighborhood38.
There are multiple modifiable risk factors for firearm violence stemming from motivation and opportunity41. Violent firearm crime occurs when three elements converge: suitable targets, motivated offenders, and absence of capable guardians38. Larger urban environments provide opportunity, whereas the socioeconomic, cultural, and transitional circumstances provide motivation. Suicide risk is derived from the desire to die and the capability to act42,43. Desire to die may arise from depression42, antisocial tendencies44, social isolation/perceived burdensomeness/thwarted belongingness42,44, remorse6,7, or a number of other causes leading to dysregulation of emotion42,44,45. Suicidal capability may be attained by access to means, inhibition through substance use46,47, repeated non-suicidal injury42 or self-harm reinforcing pain tolerance45, or acute increasing level of pain suffered42,43. Firearm-related injuries are a significant public health crisis in the US, contributing to disability, loss of productivity, and tragically, death3,4,5,6,7,22,48,49.
This retrospective analysis of the severity of injury and in-hospital mortality found the suicide group experienced more severe injuries in addition to increased mortality compared to the homicide group. Due to the driving factors of desire to die and capability, suicidal actions are deliberately taken for effectiveness. Suicide attempts therefore, as expected, have a high case fatality rate of nearly 90%50. An epidemiological trend study on firearm mortality in the US by Goldstick et al. evaluated data from 2006 to 2014, and noted that suicides were consistently the majority of firearm related deaths ranging from 54.6 to 63.7%, respectively34. In this study, head and neck injuries were more commonly associated with suicide. Self-inflicted gunshot wounds are more likely to involve the head and neck regions and often result in death51. Firearm related injuries to the head are a leading cause of TBI related morbidity and mortality, with one third of patients arriving to the hospital alive, ultimately succumbing to their injury48. The remaining two thirds of these will then go on to have TBI with potentially prolonged rehabilitation, motor deficits, cognitive disability, or other neurologic sequelae that will worsen the quality of their daily lives after attempting to end it. Mortality therefore underestimates the full impact and total health effects. Chronic pain, chronic disability, disfiguration, change in personality or mood due to organic or structural changes, risk of infection and need for persistent long-term medical care become a significant part of the both the survivor and loved ones’ interact with their communities49.
In this study, extremity injuries were more commonly observed in the homicide group. This group will also likely need additional rehabilitation, possible prosthesis, and will impact their functionality. Fowler et al., described similar results for patients who arrived to the hospital due to unintentional circumstances48. Handguns account for most of the firearm related injuries in this retrospective study. Handguns rather than shotgun or semi-automatic have a better survival rate due to continually improving trauma care and single rather than multiple penetrating wounds but still incur a significant burden22,49,52. A study evaluating homicidal gunshot wounds at a single Level 1 trauma center in Kansas found handguns to be the most common weapon of choice in their patients53. Another study in a rural Midwest level 1 trauma center performed by Guetschow et al. also observed handguns to be the most common weapon type for unintentional firearm related injuries54. This trend of handgun use over other types of firearms could mean overall improvement in trauma care as complex injury patterns are significantly more lethal22,52 regardless of improved trauma care.
A recent study from the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) found that 54% of suicide victims did not have a known mental illness37. This retrospective study found that detectable antidepressants had much higher odds (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.53, 3.98) in the suicide group than homicide. When substances were associated with the suicide group, the drugs of choice seem to be related to possibly clinically prescribed or self-medicating for distress via the sedative/analgesic/anxiolytic/antidepressant classes of drugs. This could indicate that these patients may have been already receiving some therapy or were in need of formal therapy. Access to therapists and mental health resources may have been lacking due to full patient loads, low therapist coverage, or a number of other potentially modifiable factors from the healthcare community. Korosec, et al. describes using a density of psychiatrist availability and antidepressant/anxiolytic ratios as a correlation to reduction in suicide rates55. Access to highly lethal means, in the setting of acute life stressors and substance use, even without prior suicidal ideation, may explain the increase risk of impulsivity and suicide by firearm37.
Conversely, risk factors for homicide include involvement in gang/illegal activity41 and illegal firearm possession along with socioeconomic risk factors such as income and social inequality37. Living in a community with or having witnessed firearm violence is a risk factor for adverse mental health, behavioral problems, cognitive outcomes, and worsening socioeconomic factors further propagating gang violence3,4. Physiological stress and biochemical change result from knowledge of nearby violence with firearm violence significantly impacting the degree of perceived violence and fear5. Our study found the homicide group was more likely to have used non-clinical illicit/recreational drugs associated with criminal use. Initiating substance use counseling on index admission rather than having planned follow-up as outpatient after discharge may reduce subsequent recurrence. Social services, psychiatric services, outreach, directed follow-up, and community involvement practices may benefit not only the patient but the unseen victims as witnesses, family, or community members affected by the violence3,4,5,8,9,10,55,56. Proximity to firearm violence is associated with developing depression, anxiety, and general distrust of social control especially in mothers whose mental health effects spread to her children and home life5. Psychiatric services with possible initiation of appropriate antidepressants in suicidal patients in concordance with substance use counseling8,9,10,55,56 may benefit those who were missed, self-medicating, undiagnosed, or needing appropriate care while recovering from their injuries might also improve recovery and long-term outcomes.
Access to firearms has been shown, and well described in the literature, to be associated with increased risk factor for firearm suicide related injuries25,26,30,31,57,58. In fact, after controlling for confounding factors such as unemployment, mental illness, poverty, illicit drug and alcohol dependence, firearm availability increases the risk of suicide26,58,59. A meta-analysis on accessibility of firearms and risk for suicide and homicide reported a significant increase in the odds of suicide among patients with access to firearms compared to those who did not26. Background checks are an evidence-based practice that reduce firearm violence and mortality15,24. Healthcare providers can have a positive impact in preventing firearm related injury by intentionally engaging in discussion with patients about firearm ownership and safety26,57,58.
A limitation of this article it is the retrospective nature of the paper. Even though the data from NTDB is a robust source for firearm injuries, it does not include data from acute care facilities that are not certified trauma centers, patients discharged from emergency departments, and does not speak to the circumstances preceding the injuries including homicide-suicide circumstances6,7,37. Our study also takes illicit and/or prescribed psychoactive substances into account, but did not evaluate the effect of alcohol. There is a breadth of literature discussing the relationship between ethanol use and both suicidality and homicides and may have confounded our data. While alcohol consumption is associated with increased suicide risk46,47, associations with alcohol and homicide relates to environment, situation, and variable consumption by assailant vs victim47, so we cannot infer that the patient who was shot as a bystander, assaulted, or shot in the course of other criminal activity was due to their own consumption. Although we are unable to perform a cost analysis, Cook et al. estimated the overall annual cost of firearm injuries to be $2.3 billion USD60. A more recent estimate of the societal cost of firearm injury ranks eighth on the US government expenditure list in 2010, with a cost of $174.1 billion USD61.
Conclusions
This retrospective study found, firearm suicide injuries group had a higher in-hospital mortality and higher injury severity when compared to the firearm homicide group. Suicide attempts reaching the hospital alive tended to be older white males, have more frequent severe head and neck injuries, and more likely to have antidepressants detectable on routine drug screens. Homicide patients tended to be younger African-American males, have more extremity injuries, and found to have illicit/recreational substances detectable on drug screens. The majority of suicides and homicides were committed with handguns. Several risk factors for gun violence may be mitigated as clinicians during the index admission to assist in recovery.
Data availability
All data was obtained via the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Trauma Database (NTDB). The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Data was obtained via the ACS NTDB website (https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/tqp/center-programs/ntdb).
References
Grinshteyn, E. & Hemenway, D. Violent death rates in the US compared to those of the other high-income countries, 2015. Prev. Med. 123, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.02.026 (2019).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). WISQARS (Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System). (Injury Center|CDC, 2021). https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html. Last Accessed 14 January 2022.
Leibbrand, C., Rivara, F. & Rowhani-Rahbar, A. Gun violence exposure and experiences of depression among mothers. Prev. Sci. 22(4), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01202-7 (2021).
Leibbrand, C., Hill, H., Rowhani-Rahbar, A. & Rivara, F. Invisible wounds: Community exposure to gun homicides and adolescents’ mental health and behavioral outcomes. SSM Popul. Health 4(12), 100689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100689 (2020).
Barrington, W. E. et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, perceived neighborhood factors, and cortisol responses to induced stress among healthy adults. Health Place 27, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.02.001 (2014).
Panczak, R. et al. Homicide-suicides compared to homicides and suicides: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 233(1–3), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.08.017 (2013).
Schwab-Reese, L. M. & Peek-Asa, C. Factors contributing to homicide-suicide: Differences between firearm and non-firearm deaths. J. Behav. Med. 42(4), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-019-00066-9 (2019).
Dicker, R. A. et al. Strategies for trauma centers to address the root causes of violence: Recommendations from the improving social determinants to attenuate violence (ISAVE) workgroup of the American College of Surgeons Committee on trauma. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 233(3), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.06.016 (2021).
Bachmann, S. Epidemiology of suicide and the psychiatric perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(7), 1425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071425 (2018).
Sacks, C. A. The role of physicians in preventing firearm suicides. JAMA Intern. Med. 177(1), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6715 (2017).
Miller, M., Azrael, D. & Hemenway, D. Household firearm ownership and suicide rates in the United States. Epidemiology 13(5), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200209000-00006 (2002).
Miller, M., Azrael, D., Hepburn, L., Hemenway, D. & Lippmann, S. J. The association between changes in household firearm ownership and rates of suicide in the United States, 1981–2002. Inj. Prev. 12(3), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2005.010850 (2006).
Miller, M., Lippmann, S. J., Azrael, D. & Hemenway, D. Household firearm ownership and rates of suicide across the 50 United States. J. Trauma 62(4), 1029–1034. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000198214.24056.40 (2007) (discussion 1034–5).
Global Burden of Disease 2016 Injury Collaborators, Naghavi, M., Marczak, L. B., Kutz, M., Shackelford, K. A., et al. Global mortality from firearms, 1990–2016. JAMA 320(8), 792–814. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10060 (2018). Erratum in: JAMA 320(12), 1288 2018.
Anestis, M. D. et al. The association between state laws regulating handgun ownership and statewide suicide rates. Am. J. Public Health 105(10), 2059–2067. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302465 (2015).
Anestis, M. D. & Anestis, J. C. Suicide rates and state laws regulating access and exposure to handguns. Am. J. Public Health 105(10), 2049–2058. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302753 (2015).
Anestis, M. D., Daruwala, S. & Capron, D. W. Firearm ownership, means safety, and suicidality. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 49(4), 1044–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12509 (2019).
Anestis, M. D. Advancing suicide prevention through a focus on firearm safety. Am. J. Public Health 107(11), 1701–1702. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304079 (2017).
Betz, M. E. & Anestis, M. D. Firearms, pesticides, and suicide: A look back for a way forward. Prev. Med. 138, 106144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106144 (2020).
Dowd-Arrow, B., Hill, T. D. & Burdette, A. M. Gun ownership and fear. SSM Popul. Health 30(8), 100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100463 (2019). Erratum in: SSM Popul. Health 12, 100714 (2020).
Hill, T. D. et al. Modeling recent gun purchases: A social epidemiology of the pandemic arms race. Prev. Med. Rep. 14(24), 101634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101634 (2021).
Jena, A. B., Sun, E. C. & Prasad, V. Does the declining lethality of gunshot injuries mask a rising epidemic of gun violence in the United States?. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 29(7), 1065–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2779-z (2014).
Rosengart, M. et al. An evaluation of state firearm regulations and homicide and suicide death rates. Inj. Prev. 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2004.007062 (2005).
Lee, L. K. et al. Firearm laws and firearm homicides: A systematic review. JAMA Intern. Med. 177(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7051 (2017).
Madhavan, S., Taylor, J. S., Chandler, J. M., Staudenmayer, K. L. & Chao, S. D. Firearm legislation stringency and firearm-related fatalities among children in the US. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 229(2), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.055 (2019).
Anglemyer, A., Horvath, T. & Rutherford, G. The accessibility of firearms and risk for suicide and homicide victimization among household members: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 160(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-1301 (2014). Erratum in: Ann. Intern. Med. 160(9), 658–659 (2014).
Moe, C. A., Haviland, M. J., Bowen, A. G., Rowhani-Rahbar, A. & Rivara, F. P. Association of minimum age laws for handgun purchase and possession with homicides perpetrated by young adults aged 18 to 20 years. JAMA Pediatr. 174(11), 1056–1062. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3182 (2020). Erratum In: JAMA Pediatr. 174(11), 1119 (2020).
Schell, T. L., Cefalu, M., Griffin, B. A., Smart, R. & Morral, A. R. Changes in firearm mortality following the implementation of state laws regulating firearm access and use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117(26), 14906–14910. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921965117 (2020).
Callcut, R. A., Robles, A. M., Kornblith, L. Z., Plevin, R. E. & Mell, M. W. Effect of mass shootings on gun sales-A 20-year perspective. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 87(3), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002399 (2019).
Ranney, M. L., Zeoli, A. M. & Beidas, R. Evidence-based solutions to pediatric firearm deaths-the need for out-of-the-box answers. JAMA Pediatr. 174(5), 411–412. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6239 (2020).
Grossman, D. C. et al. Gun storage practices and risk of youth suicide and unintentional firearm injuries. JAMA 293(6), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.6.707 (2005).
Sokol, R. L. et al. Firearm purchasing during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in households with teens: A national study. J. Behav. Med. 44(6), 874–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00242-w (2021).
Schleimer, J. P. et al. Firearm purchasing and firearm violence during the coronavirus pandemic in the United States: A cross-sectional study. Inj. Epidemiol. 8(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-021-00339-5 (2021).
Goldstick, J. E., Carter, P. M. & Cunningham, R. M. Current epidemiological trends in firearm mortality in the United States. JAMA Psychiat. 78(3), 241–242. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2986 (2021).
American College of Surgeons. Annual call for data: National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/tqp/center-programs/ntdb. Last Accessed 14 January 2022.
Hashmi, Z. G., Kaji, A. H. & Nathens, A. B. Practical guide to surgical data sets: National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). JAMA Surg. 153(9), 852–853. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0483 (2018).
Hink, A. B. et al. Firearm injury research and epidemiology: A review of the data, their limitations, and how trauma centers can improve firearm injury research. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 87(3), 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002330 (2019).
Branas, C. C., Richmond, T. S. & Schwab, C. W. Firearm homicide and firearm suicide: Opposite but equal. Public Health Rep. 119(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490411900203 (2004).
Manley, N. R. et al. Evolution of firearm violence over 20 years: integrating law enforcement and clinical data. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 228(4), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.033 (2019).
Livingston, D. H., Lavery, R. F., Lopreiato, M. C., Lavery, D. F. & Passannante, M. R. Unrelenting violence: An analysis of 6,322 gunshot wound patients at a Level I trauma center. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 76(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab19e7 (2014) (discussion 9–11).
Riddell, C. A., Harper, S., Cerdá, M. & Kaufman, J. S. Comparison of rates of firearm and nonfirearm homicide and suicide in black and white non-hispanic men, by U.S. state. Ann. Intern. Med. 168(10), 712–720. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-2976 (2018).
Knorr, A. C. et al. The interactive effect of major depression and nonsuicidal self-injury on current suicide risk and lifetime suicide attempts. Arch. Suicide Res. 20(4), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2016.1158679 (2016).
Law, K. C. & Anestis, M. D. Testing whether suicide capability has a dynamic propensity: The role of affect and arousal on momentary fluctuations in suicide capability. Front. Psychol. 27(12), 590187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590187 (2021).
Dhingra, K., Mitchell, S. M., Davies, B., Anestis, M. D. & Anestis, J. C. Suicide ideation among male prisoners: Preliminary evidence that psychopathic traits are indirectly linked to suicide ideation through thwarted interpersonal needs. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 50(4), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12632 (2020).
Gordon, K. H. et al. The reinforcing properties of repeated deliberate self-harm. Arch. Suicide Res. 14(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.524059 (2010).
Capron, D. W. et al. Suicide risk among male substance users in residential treatment: Evaluation of the depression-distress amplification model. Psychiatry Res. 30(237), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.060 (2016).
Branas, C. C., Han, S. & Wiebe, D. J. Alcohol use and firearm violence. Epidemiol. Rev. 38(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxv010 (2016).
Fowler, K. A., Dahlberg, L. L., Haileyesus, T. & Annest, J. L. Firearm injuries in the United States. Prev Med. 79, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.06.002 (2015).
Raza, S., Thiruchelvam, D. & Redelmeier, D. A. Death and long-term disability after gun injury: A cohort analysis. CMAJ Open 8(3), E469–E478. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190200 (2020).
Conner, A., Azrael, D. & Miller, M. Suicide case-fatality rates in the United States, 2007 to 2014: A nationwide population-based study. Ann. Intern. Med. 171(12), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-1324 (2019).
Tasigiorgos, S., Economopoulos, K. P., Winfield, R. D. & Sakran, J. V. Firearm injury in the United States: An overview of an evolving public health problem. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 221(6), 1005–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.430 (2015).
Zeineddin, A. et al. Gunshot injuries in american trauma centers: Analysis of the lethality of multiple gunshot wounds. Am. Surg. 87(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820949515 (2021).
Watson, D. et al. Demographics and incident location of traumatic injuries at a single level I trauma center. Kans. J. Med. 21(14), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol1413771 (2021).
Guetschow, B., Lilienthal, M. & Willey, M. Unintentional firearm injuries remain prevalent over a 12 year experience at a rural midwestern level 1 trauma center. Iowa Orthop. J. 38, 45–52 (2018).
Korosec Jagodic, H., Rokavec, T., Agius, M. & Pregelj, P. Availability of mental health service providers and suicide rates in Slovenia: A nationwide ecological study. Croat. Med. J. 54(5), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.444 (2013).
Rihmer, Z., Rutz, W. & Barsi, J. Suicide rate, prevalence of diagnosed depression and prevalence of working physicians in Hungary. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 88(6), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03479.x (1993).
Choron, R. L., Spitzer, S. & Sakran, J. V. Firearm violence in America: Is there a solution?. Adv. Surg. 53, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yasu.2019.04.019 (2019).
Stanley, I. H., Sachs-Ericsson, N. J. & Joiner, T. E. Suicidal ideation in the context of prospective firearm ownership. Psychiatry Res. 295, 113584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113584 (2021).
Papadopoulos, F. C. et al. Preventing suicide and homicide in the United States: The potential benefit in human lives. Psychiatry Res. 169(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.038 (2009).
Cook, P. J., Lawrence, B. A., Ludwig, J. & Miller, T. R. The medical costs of gunshot injuries in the United States. JAMA 282(5), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.5.447 (1999).
Lee, J., Quraishi, S. A., Bhatnagar, S., Zafonte, R. D. & Masiakos, P. T. The economic cost of firearm-related injuries in the United States from 2006 to 2010. Surgery 155(5), 894–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.011 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.F. and X.D. completed data collection. C.F. and C.V. performed statistical analysis. C.F., B.C., B.S., and C.H.P. wrote the manuscript. C.H.P. was senior mentor for this paper. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
We know of no conflicts of interests associated with the publication and there has been no financial support for this work that could influence its outcome.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Foote, C.W., Doan, XL., Vanier, C. et al. Suicide versus homicide firearm injury patterns on trauma systems in a study of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Sci Rep 12, 15672 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17280-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17280-2
This article is cited by
-
Characteristics of ocular injuries associated with mortality in patients admitted with major trauma
BMC Ophthalmology (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.