Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Redox signaling induces laminin receptor ribosomal protein-SA expression to improve cell adhesion following radiofrequency glow discharge treatments

Abstract

Current biomaterials effectively replace biological structures but are limited by infections and long-term material failures. This study examined the molecular mechanisms of radio frequency glow discharge treatments (RFGDT) in mediating the disinfection of biomaterial surfaces and concurrently promoting cell attachment and proliferation. Dental biomaterials were subjected to RFGDT, and viability of oral microbial species, namely Streptococcus mutants (SM), Streptococcus gordonii (SG), Moraxella catarrhalis (MC), and Porphyromonas gingivalis (PG), were assessed. Cell attachment and survival of a pre-odontoblast cell line, MDPC-23, was examined. Finally, mechanistic investigations into redox generation and biological signaling were investigated. Based on their compositions, dental biomaterials induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) following dose-dependent RFGDT. Reduced microbial viability was evident following RFGDT in the catalase-negative (SM and SG) species more prominently than catalase-positive (MC and PG) species. Cell adhesion assays noted improved MDPC-23 attachment and survival. Pretreatments with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and catalase abrogated these responses. Immunoassays noted redox-induced downstream expression of a laminin receptor, Ribosomal Protein SA, following RFGDT. Thus, RFGDT-induced redox mediates antimicrobial and improves cell responses such as adhesion and proliferation. These observations together provide a mechanistic rationale for the clinical utility of RFGDT with dental biomaterials for regenerative clinical applications.

Introduction

Biomaterials have enabled tissue engineering to evolve from an emerging science to its current pivotal role in spearheading clinical regenerative medicine1,2,3. These biomaterial systems have been readily adopted in various clinical fields for esthetics and functional replacements. There has been tremendous progress in biomaterial systems from passive, biocompatible carriers or inert replacements to current bioactive or smart systems capable of sense-and-respond capabilities4,5. Advances in these fields have encompassed newer compositions, optimized nanotopological features, biophysically-actuated and controlled-release biomaterial systems, among many others. These advancements are tied intimately with progress in development and stem cell biology, enabling a critical understanding of cell regulation during tissue healing and regeneration6,7,8. These include intrinsic regulation with key transcriptional factors, gene organization, signaling, metabolomics, and extrinsic regulation with membrane, nanoscale ligand engagement, and paracrine signaling. Moreover, among these extrinsic factors, the role of metagenomics from the pervasive microbiota is now better understood, further emphasizing the need for effective disinfection9,10,11,12,13.

The oral cavity presents several unique challenges with its soft and hard tissue biological constituents. These oral tissues represent an exclusive anatomical niche where hard tissue (teeth) is exposed through soft tissue (gingiva) via a delicate but rigorous interface. The importance of a healthy oral microbiome and the impact of dysbiosis in oral and systemic health has been well established14,15,16. These aspects present significant challenges for biomaterial replacements due to the constant biomechanical, microbiological assault, and immunological surveillance in the oral environment. The combination of physical stress, microbiological and host-derived enzymes, infections, and byproducts of degradation can all contribute synergistically to biomaterial failure17,18. Nonetheless, dentistry has very effectively utilized ceramics, metal, polymers, and their combinations as restorations, prostheses, or implants that are integral to current clinical care. Recent technologies such as digital impressions, high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), subtractive, and additive 3D printing have accelerated sophistication in device design and reduced production timelines enabling chair-side fabrication19. These advances with custom-fabricated biomaterial devices further emphasize the need to explore practical, in-office disinfection techniques.

An ideal approach must provide disinfection immediately prior to clinical use and not undermine physical or chemical material performance while optimally preparing the biomaterial interface to promote favorable host biological responses20,21. Various disinfection approaches have been employed from dry and wet heat, chemical disinfection, and biophysical means such as ultraviolet, ethylene dioxide gas, carbon dioxide, ultrasound, plasma, and microwaves22,23. Due to their device characteristics, several of these effective disinfection sources are restricted to commercial production and impractical for routine clinical use. Generation of plasma by glow discharge results from ionization of gaseous molecules termed the Townsend avalanche or discharge24,25. This process can be facilitated at atmospheric and low pressures resulting in a non-thermal process that minimally alters target surfaces. Several power sources have been utilized to generate glow-discharge plasma, such as direct current, electron cyclotron resonance, and radiofrequency. Among them, radiofrequency glow discharge treatment (RFGDT) is capable of generating a large volume of uniformly charged plasma that can flow through both conductive (metal) non-conductive (polymers) biomaterials26,27. RFGDT-generated plasma, in the presence of air or oxygen, removes organic contaminants by generating highly reactive oxygen species (ROS) that promote surface oxidation and hydroxylation28. RFGDT has also been noted to create high surface energy that increases hydrophilicity, facilitating cell spreading and attachment27,29,30. However, the precise mechanism mediating these improved cell adhesion following RFGDT has not been elucidated. This study investigated the effects of RFGDT on different dental biomaterial surfaces. The concurrent effects on disinfection of four common oral microbes and concurrent changes in cell adhesion and proliferation in an oral cell line, MDPC-23, were assessed. Finally, biochemical and molecular assays investigated the precise biological mechanism mediating the cellular responses.

Results

Redox generation at biomaterial interfaces following RFGDT

The plasma generated by RFGDT affects the surface chemistry of the biomaterials based on their composition and the presence of exogenous gases. As the dental pulp is exposed to various restorative biomaterials such as glass ionomer cement, polymers, and metals, we examined the generation of redox species following RFGDT with a chemiluminescence luminol assay31. RFGDT generated a significant increase in ROS from glass (Fig. 1a) and platinum surfaces (Fig. 1b), while minimal expression was noted on a polymeric (Polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA) surface (Fig. 1c). RFGDT induced a dose-dependent increase in redox generation with optimal noted at 180 s (Fig. 1d). As a prior study utilized various surface treatments such as detergent, alcohol, or silane, we noted that only RFGDT generates redox (Fig. 1e)27. These results show that while multiple agents can disinfect biomaterial interfaces, induction RFGDT-induced redox could persistently prevent microbial colonization while favorably modulating host cell interactions.

Figure 1
figure 1

RFGDT generates redox from biomaterial surfaces. ROS generation was assessed with Luminol chemiluminescent assay immediately after RFGDT with various biomaterials namely (a) glass, (b) metal and (c) polymer; (d) ROS generation was also assessed following varying treatment times with RFGDT; (e) Glass surfaces pretreated with ODS, alcohol, or RFGDT were assessed with Luminol assay.

Microbial colonization is inhibited by RFGDT-induced redox

To examine the disinfection potential of RFGDT, we first examined the endogenous antioxidant by incubating individual microbe with hydrogen peroxide. We noted that Streptococcus gordonni and Streptococcus mutants, which are catalase-negative, failed to generate effervescence (Fig. 2a). In contrast, Moraxella catarrhalis and Porphyromonas gingivalis, which are catalase-positive, generated profuse effervescence indicating the active ROS neutralization capabilities. Glass coverslips subjected to RFGDT were seeded with S. mutant and demonstrated reduced viability with the live-dead assay (Fig. 2b). Consistent with this observation, colony-forming units (CFUs) of S. mutants (Fig. 2c) and S. gordonni (Fig. 2d) were significantly reduced following RFGDT. The reduction in microbial survival could be prevented by pre-incubation with ROS scavengers N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) and catalase. Consistent with these observations, no differences in CFUs were observed with M. catarrhalis (Fig. 2e), and P. gingivalis (Fig. 2f) seeded on glass coverslips following RFGDT. These results demonstrate RFGDT-induced redox reduces viability and proliferation of susceptible (catalase-negative) microbes, while anaerobic, catalase-positive species were resistant.

Figure 2
figure 2

Antimicrobial effects of RFGDT. (a) Four bacterial species were subjected to hydrogen peroxide, and effervescence was assessed; (b) bacterial viability test with TTC assay was performed with S. mutans following RFGDT. Colony-forming assays were performed with four bacterial species following RFGDT namely (c) Streptococcus mutants, (d) Streptococcus gordonni, (e) Moraxella catarrhalis (f) Porphyromonas gingivalis. In some cases, incubation with N-Acetyl cysteine or catalase was performed, followed by RFGDT. n = 3, *p < 0.05. RFGDT: Radiofrequency glow discharge treatment; NAC: N Acetylcysteine; CFUs: Colony-forming units.

RFGDT improves cell adhesion and expansion

Cell adhesion to the substrate is crucial for attachment and subsequent proliferation. Several biomaterials, such as dental cements and composites, include glass or metals that directly contact dental pulp cells. Therefore, we next examined the effects of RFGDT on a mammalian pred-odontoblast cell line, MDPC-23. Glass coverslips were subjected to detergent, alcohol, silane (ODS), or RFGDT prior to seeding. We examined both weak and strong cell adhesions by assessing basal and centrifugal force-induced adherent and floating cell populations at 5 and 24 h after cell seeding. We observed a maximal number of adherent cells on RFGD treatment while most cells on ODS and alcohol-treated surfaces were non-adherent (Fig. 3a, b). Time course analysis after 5 and 24 h with the adhesion strength assays further validated this observation with silane and alcohol-treated surfaces, demonstrating most non-adherent cells in contrast to RFGDT that offered an optimal biomaterial interface for predominantly strong cell adhesion (Fig. 3c–e). The pronounced increase in non-adherent cells in the alcohol-treated group at 5 h could be attributed to a persistent residual agent reducing cell viability. Finally, incubation with either N-acetyl cysteine or catalase was noted to specifically reduce RFGDT-improved cell attachment (Fig. 3f). These results suggest that the improved cell adhesion following RFGDT is mediated via redox-mediated signaling.

Figure 3
figure 3

Cell adhesion following RFGDT. (a) MDPC-23 cells were seeded on these surfaces and assessed with microscopy; (b) Cell adherant to various treatmed biomaterial surfaces were assessed by cell counting; (c) Cell-seeded surfaces were subjected to low (2400 rpm) centrifugal forces to determine weak cell adhesions at 5 h; (d) Cell-seeded surfaces were subjected to high (4000 rpm) centrifugal forces to determine strong cell adhesions at 5 h and (e) 24 h. (f) Strong cell adhesion was assessed with glass surfaces pretreated with NAC, Catalase, or hydrogen peroxide before RFGDT. All studies, n = 3, *p < 0.05. RFGD: Radiofrequency glow discharge; ODS: n-Octadecyl Trichlorosilane; RFUs: Relative fluorescence units; NAC: N Acetylcysteine.

Improved cell adhesion is mediated via RFGDT-generated redox-mediated RPSA expression

Cell adhesion involves concerted actions of multiple cell membrane and cytoplasmic molecules capable of dynamic assembly of an attachment complex31,32,33. Among these various mediators, laminin receptors on the cell surface have been shown to play a critical role in mediating matrix interactions37. Elucidation of these adhesive complexes has also outlined several upstream signaling mediators that outline the role of a laminin receptor, Ribosomal Protein SA (RPSA), induced by redox signaling34,35. Hence, to examine the effects of redox signaling on cell adhesion, MDPC-23 cells were treated with various concentrations of hydrogen peroxide that demonstrated increased RPSA and phospho-FAK397 expression (Fig. 4a–c). Next, we examined if the RFGDT-improved cell adhesion could be mediated via a similar mechanism. We observed a robust increase in phospho-FAK397 and RPSA expression following RFGDT by immunoblotting (Fig. 4d, e) and immunofluorescence (Fig. 4f, g). These responses were abrogated by pretreatment of the biomaterial surface with silane or by adding NAC, indicating these are redox-mediated. Finally, we inquired if the improved cell attachment via the enhanced laminin receptor following RFGDT would affect cell survival and proliferation. We observed a significant improvement (n = 3, p < 0.05) in RGFDT group compared to all other groups (Fig. 4h). These results suggest improved cell adhesion following RFGDT could be mediated via induced RPSA expression.

Figure 4
figure 4

Redox generated by RFGDT induces RPSA expression. (a) Western blots for RPSA and activated FAK expression was assessed following hydrogen peroxide treatments over time; (b) and (c) band quantitation of the western blots is shown; (d) Similar analysis was performed following RFGDT on glass surfaces. Some samples were pretreated with ODS or NAC before RFGDT and cell seeding; (e) band quantitation of the western blots is shown; (f) Immunofluorescence for RPSA expression was performed on these glass surfaces following pretreatments or RFGDT; (g) quantification in five high power fields as means with standard deviations; (h) Glass surfaces were subjected to silane, alcohol, or RFGDT and seeded with MDPC-23 cells. Cell numbers were assessed with AlamarBlue assay after 24 h. n = 3, *p < 0.05. RFGDT: Radiofrequency glow discharge treatment; ODS: n-Octadecyl Trichlorosilanel; NAC: N Acetylcysteine; DAPI: 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Discussion

Biomaterial interfaces represent a major frontier for improving functional integration and determining clinical therapeutic outcomes36. Significant progress in biomaterial composition and design has evolved from simple biocompatible, inert interfaces to existing bioactive surfaces. More recent biomaterial systems focus on smart systems capable of sense-and-respond to biological scenarios with directed responses. A major functional characteristic of these biomaterial interfaces is to promote desirable biological responses while actively dissuading detrimental ones selectively3. Some of the latter responses are directed at reducing microbial (biofilm) burden to prevent protracted inflammation or host immune responses37,38. This facilitates routine tissue healing responses and may enable regenerative clinical outcomes.

This study utilized common oral microbes and cells from the dental pulp to examine the effects of RFGDT on biomaterials used routinely in clinical dentistry. Pulpal inflammation due to caries results in irreversible necrosis, necessitating Endodontic intervention and coronal restorations. Various pulp capping agents such as calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Emdogain, or glass ionomer cement provide cues to promote tissue healing (osteodentin). However, they do not directly address residual infection that leads to protracted inflammation. Direct plasma surface modification strategies generate antibacterial properties via modulating surface topography or chemistry39. Besides serving as an alternate disinfection technique, its effects on improving biocompatible interfaces have been well documented. This prominent dual-action of RFGDT noted in this study, namely antimicrobial disinfection and promoting cell adhesion and expansion, is particularly attractive for clinical use (Fig. 5)40,41. The antimicrobial actions of RFGDT predominantly targeting the catalase-negative microbes appear to be directly relevant to healthy clinical scenarios where aerobic bacteria predominate. The reduced efficacy on catalase-negative microbes was evident in this study could be clinically addressed with additional rinses or medications prior to material placement.

Figure 5
figure 5

Outline of RFGDT responses. The image shows the dual actions of the redox generated by RFGDT with an antimicrobial effect on oral bacteria while inducing the laminin adhesion receptor, RPSA facilitating improved cell attachment and expansion of odontoblasts.

This study noted that the generation of redox species from biomaterial surfaces was based on their chemical composition. While both glass and platinum could induce redox, the polymeric (PMMA) substrate demonstrated minimal induction. This appears to reflect the ionization potential of the predominant elemental (Glass: Silica 786 kJ/mol and Platinum 867 kJ/mol) constituents that are representative of dental biomaterials such as reinforced cement and metal implants. Glass or metal reinforced cements and composites are routinely used as dental restorative materials. A prior study noted that Dicor glass-restorations luted with resin composites improved clinical survival than other biomaterials42. However, unlike glass and these two biomaterials that intimately interact with cells, the polymeric material (PMMA: 6857 kJ/mol) is predominantly used to fabricate external prosthetic devices where the disinfection non-adhesive characteristics are of most significance. Future investigations could investgate the cellular responses to PMMA including funcationalization approaches to improve cellular interface. Nonetheless, direct composite materials such as pulp dressings would appear unsuitable for the RFGDT technique.

We observed an optimal treatment time of three minutes for disinfection and improved cell adhesion with RFGDT for glass surfaces under vacuum. Besides the biomaterial composition and treatment time, other variables determining these interfacial responses include gaseous composition (such as helium or argon) within the chamber, energy density, and the presence of other trace agents43,44. Attention to these parameters can enable the development of future biomaterial-specific RFGDT protocols. It is also important to emphasize that the RFGDT was performed on inanimate biomaterial surfaces, before cell seeding, without direct exposure to microbes or cells. Direct treatments with non-thermal plasma on mammalian cells result in DNA damage and loss of viability45. This essentially implies that direct clinical RFGDT on human tissues for disinfection or improving cellular responses is an untenable strategy. Nonetheless, surface treatments of biomaterial devices could prime them for optimal tissue interactions such as osseointegration of metallic implants, glass ionomer, or metal-reinforced composites as dental filling materials. The latter application was a primary motivation in our choice of the pre-odontoblast cell line, MDPC-23. Interestingly, we have observed differential redox sensitivity among cells of discrete lineage in other studies46. Future studies could examine the selectivity of RFGDT on complex multipartite biomaterial systems with specific cell types such as osteoblasts (osseointegration), keratinocytes (wound healing), fibroblasts (matrix production), or endothelial cells (angiogenesis) for directed clinical outcomes. This study observed RFGDT-generated ROS detected using chemiluminescence following oxidation of luminol31. The amounts and discrete ROS have critical roles in cell survival, migration, and apoptosis47,48. Redox is a physiological regulator of intracellular signaling cascades, especially tyrosine kinase-mediated growth factors, has gained recent attention due to its ability to reversibly oxidize redox-sensitive targets49. These reversible redox modifications of cysteine-residues in proteins, also termed thiol switches, are regulated by oxidoreductase and thiol-isomerases50. Their primary function involves neutralizing excessive redox in the biological system that can lead to deleterious damage. Other targets of redox-generated signaling include a broad array of cytoskeletal components, signaling intermediates, and transcriptional regulators.

A significant finding in this study is that RFGDT induced redox promotes expression of the laminin receptor, Ribosomal Protein SA (RPSA), that contributes to improved cell adhesion and survival. Laminins are high molecular weight extracellular glycoproteins that constitute the major non-collagenous component of basal lamina in cells51,52. Their multidomain proteins are encoded by eleven human genes characterized by heterodimeric α, β and γ chains that constitute 16 different isoforms. Their key contributions to cellular functions such as adhesion, migration, and differentiation are well described. There have been recent insights into the roles of specific Laminins to selectively drive cellular enrichment and lineage specification that has potent implications for tissue healing and regeneration53. Besides the prototypical members, there are many proteins with laminin-like domains that include RPSA, LamR, 37LRP, and LBP/p40, among others54. RPSA is a ribosomal protein with several pathophysiological functions in protein translation, cell adhesion, tumor cell invasion, viral cell entry, and small molecule sensing55,56. The amino acid sequence is evolutionarily conserved with over 98%c homology in all mammals and structural similarities with the prokaryotic gene, RPS254. It would be interesting to examine the functional significance of RFGDT induced RPS2 in the microbial species in future studies.

RPSA has been noted to be involved in cap-dependent eukaryotic translation, especially in transformed and viral infected cells. However, upstream induction of RPSA signaling remains to be fully elucidated. A few prior reports have noted that RPSA is induced by redox-generated signaling, suggesting it is a redox-inducible target gene34,35. Consistent with these reports, this study outlines the ability of RFGDT induced redox to increase RPSA expression. The increased expression of this cell adhesion receptor would contribute to improved attachment and survival of the MDPC-23 cells. Membrane clustering of these laminin receptors has been noted to induce tyrosine 397 phosphorylation of FAK, as was also noted in this study. Both FAK and Src activation at these membrane adhesion complexes further drive cellular functions such as cell spreading, migration, proliferation, and prevention of apoptosis. Thus, the use of RFGDT appears to evoke discrete redox-generated biological responses that can be harnessed for both disinfection and cellular functions such as cell attachment, expansion, and differentiation to aid tissue regeneration.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates the ability of a non-invasive, directed energy tool, RFGDT, to be capable of concurrent antimicrobial disinfection and improved directed cellular responses via redox-signaling. This showcases RFGDT as a simple, cost-effective, and convenient bench-top tool for clinical application to improve tissue healing and regenerative outcomes.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Mouse dental pulp cells (MDPC-23, kind gift from Drs. Jacques Nor and Tatiana Botero, Universithy at Michigan) were maintained in DMEM (Glutamax, high-glucose) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (certified grade) and 100 units mL−1 Penicillin and 100 µg mL−1 Streptomycin (all from Thermo-Scientific, USA). Cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified chamber with 5% CO2.

Sample preparation and sterilization

Cover glass (18 mm, 0.12–0.17 mm thickness, Matsunami micro cover glass) were first cleaned with 10% detergent (Sparkleen, Fisher Scientific, USA) and sonicated (Aristocrat Ultrasonic, Healthco, USA) for 10 min, followed by three washes in distilled water and allowed to dry vertically in a holder. Following this, some covers slips were soaked in 95% Ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 10 min, while another set was soaked in 2% n-octadecyl trichlorosilane (ODS) for 10 min. Finally, another set of coverslips was subjected to RFGDT, as described below. Except for the RFGDT, all samples were sterilized under UV light or 15 min before cell seeding.

Radiofrequency glow discharge treatments (RFGDT)

A partial air-vacuum RFGD device (PDC-32G, Harrick Scientific, USA) was used as per the manufacturer's instructions. The biomaterials (glass coverslips, platinum sheets, or PMMA discs) were placed within the chamber and treated for various times as indicated in individual studies. Biomaterial specimens were used immediately for biochemical, microbiological, or cell adhesion/survival studies.

AlamarBlue assay

MDPC-23 cells were seeded at a cell density of 1 × 105 cells mL−1 on the treated glass surfaces described above placed in a 12 well dish. Cell viability and proliferation were assessed with the AlamarBlue assay as per the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, following 24 h of cell incubation, 10% (v/v) of AlamarBlue reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was added to complete media and incubated for 2 h. Replicates of conditioned media from each well were transferred to black wells, and fluorescence was assessed using a plate reader (Victor3, Perkin Elmer, USA).

Cell adhesion assay

MDPC-23 cells were seeded at a cell density of 1 × 105 cells mL−1 on the treated glass surfaces described above placed in a 12 well dish. Cell adhesion was assessed after 5 h of incubation as described previously. As equivalent cells were seeded on all substrate conditions and no proliferation is expected within 5 h, the non-adherent, floating cells (higher, more reliable global numbers) in each condition were counted rather than imaging multiple high-power fields (lower, less reliable local numbers) per well. Media from each well was collected, stained with Trypan Blue (0.4% w/v, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and assessed for floating (non-seeded) cells. After replacing the media, plates were subjected to centrifugation (Eppendorf, USA) at 2400 rpm (weak adhesions) and 4000 rpm (strong adhesions) for 6 min, and the media was collected to assess cell numbers. Images were also captured of these wells before and after spinning to document the number and morphology of the adherent cell populations. In some studies, Catalase (10 uM), N-acetyl cysteine (1 mM), or hydrogen peroxide (all from Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were included in the media prior to cell seeding of the glass surfaces to assess the role of RFGDT-induced ROS in mediating cell adhesion.

ROS detection assay

To assess RFGDT-generated ROS, a chemiluminescence assay with Luminol (detects both extra- and intracellular ROS) was utilized as described previously33. Briefly, a solution was prepared by mixing 5 mg of luminol powder with 100 mL of 1 M Sodium hydroxide (both Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and mixed gently. The freshly prepared luminol solution was added to the cells in a 12 wells plate at a ratio of 1 mL/well (v/v) immediately after RFGDT treatments at different doses, and chemiluminescence was detected at 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 min using a multiwell detector (Victor3, Perkin Elmer, USA).

Western blotting

Glass coverslips were RFGDT treated and seeded with MDPC23 cells. After 5 h of incubation in CO2 incubator, the attached cells on the coverslip were collected from different groups, and collected cells were re-suspended in RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) with Mini Protease Inhibitor (Thermo Scientific, USA). Cells were disturbed with two cycles of sonication (QSonica, USA) for 5 s each, and lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C for 20 min. The total protein in the lysates was quantified with the Bradford assay kit (BCA Protein Assay, Thermo Scientific Inc). Protein lysates were separated in precast mini-protein TGX stain-free gels and transferred to PVDF membranes (both Bio-Rad, USA). Blots were initially blocked with 1% BSA for 1 h and further incubated with primary antibodies for Ribosomal Protein SA (RPSA, Abcam, USA) or phospho-FAK (Cell signaling, USA) at 4 °C overnight. Following washes, blots were incubated for normalization with appropriate species-specific HRP conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell signaling, USA) or HRP-conjugated β-actin (Cell signaling, USA). Finally, the blots were developed by using chemiluminescent substrates (Thermo Scientific, USA), and images were scanned digitally using ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). Western blots protein band intensities were quantified by using ImageJ software. Multiple blot exposures are provided in supporting figures.

Immunofluorescence staining

In all groups, immunofluorescent experiments were carried out using primary laminin antibody (RPSA) (Cat # ab133645, Abcam, USA) and Alexa fluor 488 secondary antibody (Cat # 4412S, Cell signaling, USA), image were captured by using ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-rad, USA), where nucleus was counterstained stained with DAPI. Digital images were captured, and following thresholding, fluorescence intensity over the entire field was quantified using NIH ImageJ software as described previsouly57,58.

Microbial viability assay

Facultative anaerobes such as Streptococcus mutants (S. mutants), Streptococcus gordonii DL1 (S. Gordonni), Moraxella catarrhalis (M. catarrhalis) were grown in brain heart infusion medium (BD Bioscience, USA) at 37 ℃ and Obligate anaerobe Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) was grown anaerobically in trypticase soy broth medium (BD Bioscience, USA) supplemented with 10% sheep blood, hemin (5 μg mL−1) and menadione (1 μg mL−1) and incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere of N2/H2/CO2 (90:5:5). A single colony of each bacterium was added to 5% or 15% of H2O2 and qualitatively analyzed for the presence of antioxidant catalase. For the survival assay, a 10% 2,3,5-Triphenyl-tetrazolium chloride solution (TTC, Sigma Aldrich, USA) was added to cultures wells and incubated for 6–12 h or until red color change was apparent. Color intensity was quantified by using a microplate reader (SpectraMax i3x, Molecular device, USA) at 480 nm.

Microbial survival assay

For the CFU assays, coverslips were inoculated with 250 uL respective bacterial culture and incubated in species-specific growth conditions for 24 h (S. gordonni, M. catarrhalis, S. mutants) or 5 days (P. gingivalis). Aliquots of bacterial culture from glass coverslips were serially diluted by tenfold dilutions and plated via the drop plate technique.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed using Excel (Microsoft, USA), and statistical significance was assessed using either a one-way ANOVA or t tests, where p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All studies were repeated at least twice, with each assay performed in minimum duplicates.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. However, any further information or material is available from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Discher, D. E., Mooney, D. J. & Zandstra, P. W. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 324, 1673–1677. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171643 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Langer, R. & Vacanti, J. P. Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920–926. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8493529 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arany, P. R. & Mooney, D. J. At the edge of translation—Materials to program cells for directed differentiation. Oral Dis. 17, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01735.x (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rahman, S. U., Nagrath, M., Ponnusamy, S. & Arany, P. R. Nanoscale and macroscale scaffolds with controlled-release polymeric systems for dental craniomaxillofacial tissue engineering. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081478 (2018).

  5. Lutolf, M. P. & Hubbell, J. A. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1055 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Srivastava, D. & DeWitt, N. In vivo cellular reprogramming: The next generation. Cell 166, 1386–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.055 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens, M. M. et al. In vivo engineering of organs: The bone bioreactor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11450–11455. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504705102 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garrett, W. S. et al. Communicable ulcerative colitis induced by T-bet deficiency in the innate immune system. Cell 131, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.017 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Macpherson, A. J. et al. A primitive T cell-independent mechanism of intestinal mucosal IgA responses to commensal bacteria. Science 288, 2222–2226. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5474.2222 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazmanian, S. K., Liu, C. H., Tzianabos, A. O. & Kasper, D. L. An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell 122, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.007 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reinhardt, C., Reigstad, C. S. & Backhed, F. Intestinal microbiota during infancy and its implications for obesity. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 48, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0b013e318183187c (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sudo, N. et al. The requirement of intestinal bacterial flora for the development of an IgE production system fully susceptible to oral tolerance induction. J. Immunol. 159, 1739–1745 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dewhirst, F. E. et al. The human oral microbiome. J. Bacteriol. 192, 5002–5017. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00542-10 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Genco, R. J., Grossi, S. G., Ho, A., Nishimura, F. & Murayama, Y. A proposed model linking inflammation to obesity, diabetes, and periodontal infections. J. Periodontol. 76, 2075–2084. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.11-S.2075 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jenkinson, H. F. & Lamont, R. J. Oral microbial communities in sickness and in health. Trends Microbiol. 13, 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2005.09.006 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinna, R., Usai, P., Filigheddu, E., Garcia-Godoy, F. & Milia, E. The role of adhesive materials and oral biofilm in the failure of adhesive resin restorations. Am. J. Dent. 30, 285–292 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart, C. A. & Finer, Y. Biostable, antidegradative and antimicrobial restorative systems based on host-biomaterials and microbial interactions. Dent. Mater. 35, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.013 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Latimer, J. M. et al. Regenerative medicine technologies to treat dental, oral, and craniofacial defects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 704048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.704048 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Martins, N. & Rodrigues, C. F. Biomaterial-related infections. J. Clin. Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030722 (2020).

  21. Rimondini, L., Fini, M. & Giardino, R. The microbial infection of biomaterials: A challenge for clinicians and researchers. A short review. J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 3, 1–10 (2005).

  22. Dai, Z., Ronholm, J., Tian, Y., Sethi, B. & Cao, X. Sterilization techniques for biodegradable scaffolds in tissue engineering applications. J. Tissue Eng. 7, 2041731416648810. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731416648810 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tao, M. et al. Sterilization and disinfection methods for decellularized matrix materials: Review, consideration and proposal. Bioact. Mater 6, 2927–2945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.010 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Langmuir, I. Oscillations in ionized gases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 14, 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.14.8.627 (1928).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Mott-Smith, H. M. History of “plasmas”. Nature 233, 219. https://doi.org/10.1038/233219a0 (1971).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Youngblood, T. & Ong, J. L. Effect of plasma-glow discharge as a sterilization of titanium surfaces. Implant. Dent. 12, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000034203.68536.2f (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ali, H., Baier, R. E., Dziak, R. & Andreana, S. Promotion of cells to close gaps and encourage cell coverage, by radio frequency glow discharge treatment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 105, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35888 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lai, H. C. et al. The influence of surface energy on early adherent events of osteoblast on titanium substrates. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 93, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32542 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baier, R. E. & Meyer, A. E. Implant surface preparation. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 3, 9–20 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baier, R. E., Meyer, A. E., Natiella, J. R., Natiella, R. R. & Carter, J. M. Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: Methods and results. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 18, 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820180404 (1984).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bedouhene, S., Moulti-Mati, F., Hurtado-Nedelec, M., Dang, P. M. & El-Benna, J. Luminol-amplified chemiluminescence detects mainly superoxide anion produced by human neutrophils. Am. J. Blood Res. 7, 41–48 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gumbiner, B. M. Cell adhesion: The molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81279-9 (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zaidel-Bar, R. Cadherin adhesome at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 126, 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.111559 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vilas-Boas, F. et al. Hydrogen peroxide regulates cell adhesion through the redox sensor RPSA. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 90, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.11.019 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kang, H. S. et al. LRP1-dependent pepsin clearance induced by 2’-hydroxycinnamaldehyde attenuates breast cancer cell invasion. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 53, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2014.04.021 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tibbitt, M. W., Rodell, C. B., Burdick, J. A. & Anseth, K. S. Progress in material design for biomedical applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14444–14451. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516247112 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Li, W., Thian, E. S., Wang, M., Wang, Z. & Ren, L. Surface design for antibacterial materials: from fundamentals to advanced strategies. Adv Sci (Weinh). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100368 (2021).

  38. Franz, S., Rammelt, S., Scharnweber, D. & Simon, J. C. Immune responses to implants—A review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials. Biomaterials 32, 6692–6709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Akdogan, E. & Sirin, H. T. Plasma surface modification strategies for the preparation of antibacterial biomaterials: A review of the recent literature. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 131, 112474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112474 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Baier, R. E. Principles of adhesion. Oper Dent. 5, 1–9 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Baier, R. E. Surface behaviour of biomaterials: The theta surface for biocompatibility. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 17, 1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0444-8 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Malament, K. A. & Socransky, S. S. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: Effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure. J. Prosthet. Dent. 86, 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119415 (2001).

  43. Shibata, Y., Hosaka, M., Kawai, H. & Miyazaki, T. Glow discharge plasma treatment of titanium plates enhances adhesion of osteoblast-like cells to the plates through the integrin-mediated mechanism. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 17, 771–777 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yamamoto, H., Shibata, Y. & Miyazaki, T. Anode glow discharge plasma treatment of titanium plates facilitates adsorption of extracellular matrix proteins to the plates. J. Dent. Res. 84, 668–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400717 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kalghatgi, S. et al. Effects of non-thermal plasma on mammalian cells. PLoS ONE 6, e16270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016270 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Engel, K. W., Khan, I. & Arany, P. R. Cell lineage responses to photobiomodulation therapy. J. Biophotonics 9, 1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201600025 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chiu, J. & Dawes, I. W. Redox control of cell proliferation. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 592–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2012.08.002 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Trachootham, D., Lu, W., Ogasawara, M. A., Nilsa, R. D. & Huang, P. Redox regulation of cell survival. Antioxid. Redox Signal 10, 1343–1374. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2007.1957 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Chiarugi, P. Reactive oxygen species as mediators of cell adhesion. Ital. J. Biochem. 52, 28–32 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lorenzen, I., Eble, J. A. & Hanschmann, E. M. Thiol switches in membrane proteins—Extracellular redox regulation in cell biology. Biol. Chem. 402, 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2020-0266 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Aumailley, M. The laminin family. Cell Adh. Migr. 7, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.4161/cam.22826 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Timpl, R. et al. Laminin—A glycoprotein from basement membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 9933–9937 (1979).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ohta, R. et al. Laminin-guided highly efficient endothelial commitment from human pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 35680. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35680 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Satoh, K. et al. Cloning of 67-kDa laminin receptor cDNA and gene expression in normal and malignant cell lines of the human lung. Cancer Lett. 62, 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3835(92)90096-e (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Legler, D. Physical therapy in children with asthma and mucoviscidosis. Kinderkrankenschwester 11, 70–71 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tachibana, H., Koga, K., Fujimura, Y. & Yamada, K. A receptor for green tea polyphenol EGCG. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 380–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb743 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Arena, E. T. et al. Quantitating the cell: Turning images into numbers with ImageJ. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Dev. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.260 (2017).

  58. Hartig, S. M. Basic image analysis and manipulation in ImageJ. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb1415s102 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a faculty start-up grant (PRA). This manuscript is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Robert E Baier.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.P and H.A. performed studies and prepared the primary draft of the manuscript, F.D, S.R., M.P and A.S. assisted with various studies and data collection; R.B. provided inputs with initial study design and P.A. supervised the project and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praveen R. Arany.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ponnusamy, S., Ali, H.H., Dutt, F. et al. Redox signaling induces laminin receptor ribosomal protein-SA expression to improve cell adhesion following radiofrequency glow discharge treatments. Sci Rep 12, 7742 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11766-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11766-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing