The Indian and Pacific Oceans surround the Maritime Continent (MC). Major modes of sea surface temperature variability in both oceans, including the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) and El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), can strongly affect precipitation on the MC. The prevalence of fires in the MC is closely associated with precipitation amount and terrestrial water storage in September and October. Precipitation and terrestrial water storage, which is a measurement of hydrological drought conditions, are significantly modulated by Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) and El Niño events. We utilize long-term datasets to study the combined effects of ENSO and the IOD on MC precipitation during the past 100 years (1900–2019) and find that the reductions in MC precipitation and terrestrial water storage are more pronounced during years when El Niño and a positive phase of the IOD (pIOD) coincided. The combined negative effects are produced mainly through an enhanced reduction of upward motion over the MC. Coincident El Niño-pIOD events have occurred more frequently after 1965. However, climate models do not project a higher occurrence of coincident El Niño-pIOD events in a severely warming condition, implying that not the global warming but the natural variability might be the leading cause of this phenomenon.
Wildfire outbreaks occur worldwide, threatening lives and causing property damage. One of the most fire-prone places in the world is the Maritime Continent (MC), which is located in the deep tropics and flanked by the tropical Pacific Ocean to the east and the tropical Indian Ocean to the west. Farmers in the MC set fires to clear land for planting palm trees. Although they usually manage to clear lands safely, fires can get out of control in exceptionally dry years and cause catastrophe. In 2015, schools and offices in the MC faced closures and planes were unable to take off due to the toxic smog caused by severe wildfires. Studies have revealed that MC fires usually begin in the boreal summer and peak in September and October (SO)1 and that wildfires occur most frequently during years with reduced precipitation2,3,4,5 (Fig. S1). Due to its geographical location, MC precipitation is significantly influenced by both El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events to the east and Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) events to the west6,7.
ENSO is the leading mode of sea surface temperature (SST) variability in the Pacific and is characterized by warm SST anomalies in the equatorial eastern-to-central Pacific during its El Niño phase. El Niño events typically develop during boreal summer and mature during boreal winter. The first leading mode of SST variability in the Indian Ocean is the basin-wide monopole, and the IOD is the second leading mode statistically8,9,10. During its positive phase, the IOD (pIOD; hereafter) is characterized by positive SST anomalies in the western Indian Ocean and negative SST anomalies in the eastern Indian Ocean. Although the magnitude of SST anomalies associated with the IOD is typically smaller than those associated with El Niño events, the IOD is essential in modulating precipitation across the MC1. The pIOD events can affect the precipitation not only by inducing anomalous Walker subsidence but also by reducing water vapor transport into the MC from the Indian Ocean10. The consensus of previous studies is that both El Niño and the pIOD can reduce MC precipitation6,11,12, because their warm SST anomalies weaken the Pacific and Indian Ocean branch of the Walker circulation resulting in anomalous subsidence over the MC region. Previous studies have shown the combined role of the El Niño type and the IOD phase in affecting the fire activities over the MC regions from 1979 to 201611. In addition, in the past several decades, fire events have been increased dramatically associated with more frequent droughts. Whether such frequent droughts are related to the occurrence of both El Niño and pIOD events has not yet been studied.
It is known well that the IOD can be externally forced by ENSO13 and internally produced by the Indian Ocean–atmosphere coupling8,10,14,15,16, and the ENSO can also be forced by IOD15,17. Typically, an El Niño event forces a pIOD event during its developing year via the oceanic channel18 and the atmospheric bridge mechanism19,20,21. Model experiments suggested that approximately one-third of IOD events can be explained by ENSO variability while the other two-thirds are internally generated14,16. It has also been increasingly recognized that ENSO properties have changed in recent decades, possibly due to global warming or natural decadal variability22,23,24. Different types of ENSO, such as the Eastern Pacific and Central Pacific types25,26,27, produce different impacts on the Walker circulation28. Also, the degrees of drought caused by ENSO get more severe over the past decades29. The ENSO-IOD relationship may have changed as a result of the change in ENSO properties and/or the internal atmosphere–ocean coupling in the Indian Ocean. It is, therefore, unknown whether (1) coincident El Niño-pIOD events have occurred more or less frequently during recent decades, and (2) the combined effects of coincident El Niño-pIOD events are similar or very different from the effect of El Niño-only and pIOD-only events. In this study, we utilize long-term (more than 100 years) observational datasets and model results, mainly focusing on September and October that is the mature time of IOD event and the strongest fire seasons to address these two questions. Notice that the MC area is defined as the region from 10° S to 10° N and 90° E to 150° E in this study.
Figure 1a shows the climatology annual cycle in MC precipitation, with the driest and wettest months observed in August and December, respectively (black line with grey shaded). The precipitation decreases gradually from December to August of the next year. The annual cycles calculated from the El Niño-only and pIOD-only years were similar to the climatological from December to May of the next year, and drier than the climatology from June to November. Moreover, the annual cycles of MC precipitation for the coincident El Niño-pIOD years were notably drier than the climatology from June to December. During coincident event years, MC precipitation decreased the most (up to 100 mm) during September and October (SO).
Studies have shown that wildfires are most likely to occur in the MC during SO1,5 (also seen Fig. S1) and that the fire-prone months usually lag the dry months because the ground cover requires approximately 1 to 3 months to transform into low water condition30. Furthermore, the land can remember atmospheric forcing conditions and responds several months later31. This lagged response feature can be clearly seen in Fig. 1b, which presents the annual cycle of the TWS anomaly (remove annual mean, TWSA, hereafter) in the MC from the CLM. The figure reveals that the lowest TWSA occurs about 2 months after the driest precipitation month. Additionally, similar to the precipitation response in the pIOD-only years, insignificantly decreases in TWSA were observed compared to the climatology from September to next January. The TWSA in the El Niño-only years was slightly lower than that in the pIOD-only years. The TWSA in the coincident El Niño-pIOD years was significantly lower than the climatology throughout the year. The differences in TWSA in the coincident years were particularly evident from June onwards.
The signal of pIOD and El Niño events starts from boreal summer; then, MC precipitation was deficient; consequently, the TWSA gradually decreased and reached its minimum in November, two months after the least precipitation month. As mentioned, because of the reduced precipitation and lower TWS in SO, the ground cover becomes dry and serves as potential fuel for fire events. Thus, this study focuses on the SO period, which is the peak of fire season, and explores why so much less precipitation occurs during coincident El Niño-pIOD events than during pIOD-only or El Niño-only events.
Figure 2 shows the vertical cross-section of the vertical velocity over the equatorial Indo-Pacific Oceans (averaged between 10° S and 10° N) during SO. Compared to the climatology, weak and narrow areas of sinking motion were observed over the MC area during El Niño-only and pIOD-only events. During pIOD-only events, for example, anomalous subsidence occurred between 850 and 200 hPa over a small area near 105° E. However, the subsidence anomaly is broad and covers the entire MC during the coincident El Niño-pIOD events, in which the anomalous weak Walker circulation over the equatorial Pacific was also more robust than that of the El Niño-only events. Thus, the coincident El Niño-pIOD events on average produced stronger anomalous subsidence over the MC area associated with a greater reduction in precipitation than El Niño-only and pIOD-only events. We also examined whether the anomalies produced by the coincident events are equal to or greater than the combined effects produced by the El Niño-only and pIOD-only events. Figure 2d shows the difference between the coincident events (Fig. 2c) and the summation of El Niño-only and pIOD-only (Fig. 2a,b). This difference clearly shows strong subsidence anomalies over the MC regions. Therefore, the impacts produced by the coincident events are not just a linear combination but the manifestation of a nonlinear amplification of the individual impacts from the El Niño-only and pIOD-only events. This nonlinear amplification may be due to the nonlinear relationship between SST and convection. Another possible cause is the influence of the IOD events on the ENSO events, that is the strength of El Niño in the coincident El Niño-pIOD events usually stronger than the El Niño-only events17.
The characteristics of the El Niño have changed since the late twentieth century22,23,32,33. To explore the temporal variations of MC’s hydroclimate during the twentieth century, an empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis was applied to the SO precipitation for the period 1911 to 2015. The first EOF mode explains approximately one-third (34.2%) of the total variance in the precipitation (Fig. 3a,b). This leading EOF mode (in its positive phase) is characterized by a uniformly negative anomalous precipitation pattern through the MC except over the northern part of Sumatra and the western part of Malaysia (Fig. 3a). Figure 3b displays the principal component (PC) of this leading mode. In the figure, pIOD-only, El Niño-only, coincident El Niño-pIOD, and neutral years are indicated by green, blue, red, and gray bars, respectively. The anomalous precipitation time series is also shown in Fig. 3b, and has a characteristic similar to those of the 1st PC (Fig. 3b). In Fig. 3b, the number of red bars increased slightly during around 1920 and increased dramatically after 1965, indicates that the frequency of coincident El Niño-pIOD events has increased in these two periods. Also, the amplitude of red bar is larger after 1965. At the same time, the precipitation anomalies and TWSA in SO decreased a lot after 1965 (Fig. 3c), implies that the extend of fires may be more severe after 1965. A wavelet analysis of the SO anomalies in the MC precipitation (Fig. 4a) further reveals this high-frequency variation in the precipitation with a period of about 2–4 years. This variation was strong during 1910–1930, weakened afterward, but intensified again beginning around 1965. These two strong periods coincide with the period when the coincident El Niño-pIOD events occurred most frequently at around 1920 and during the past 40 years (Figs. 3b and 4a).
We next use 18 CMIP5 historical simulations to further explore the occurrence frequency of the coincident events (Fig. 4b). The coincident percentage is defined as the ratio of the number of coincident events to the sum of El Niño-only events, pIOD-only events, and coincident El Niño-pIOD events in each model simulation. The mean and standard deviation of the coincident percentages during 1905–2004 across the 18 models are displayed in Fig. 4b. We plotted coincident percentage of 1925–1964 and 1965–2004, the two periods with two relatively less and more coincident El Niño-pIOD events from observations (Fig. 3b). Consistent with the findings in observations, model simulations suggest that coincident El Niño-pIOD events are likely to occur more frequently during the period 1965–2004 than during 1925–1964, although the coincident percentage in 1965–2004 is greatly lower than the same period in observation. We also use CMIP5 projections to explore possible future changes in the frequency of coincident events. Figure 4c shows the mean value and standard deviation of the coincident percentages in the preindustrial control (piControl), representative concentration pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5, from 2006 to 2099) and representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5, from 2006 to 2099) simulations from the 18 CMIP5 models. The figure shows that the coincident percentage median increased from piControl to historical, decreased from historical to RCP4.5, and increased again from RCP4.5 to RCP8.5. The fact that the percentages difference for these four simulations (Fig. 4c) are too small prevents us from attributing the shift in the occurrence of coincidental ENSO and IOD events to global warming.
Discussion and conclusions
This study employed statistical analysis of observations, reanalysis datasets, and climate model simulations to better understand how dry season precipitation over the MC area is affected by coincident El Niño-pIOD events during 1900–2019. Our results indicated that coincident El Niño-pIOD events produce a much stronger suppression effect on MC precipitation from June to November than El Niño-only or pIDO-only events. A lagged response in TWS, in turn, leads to drier ground cover and increases the risk of severe fires in September–October. In other words, it is the significant decrease of precipitation in coincident El Niño-pIOD events and the lagged response of total water storage, the severe fires happened in SO (Fig. S1). We also discovered that the occurrence frequency of the coincident El Niño-pIOD events has greatly increased since the mid-1960s in the observations (Fig. 3b) and CMIP5 historical simulations (Fig. 4b).
Previous studies showed that the relationship between ENSO and IOD has inter-decadal variations, and the strengths of ENSO are also highly correlated with IOD34,35. Compared to global warming, the variation of coincident El Niño-pIOD events number in the past 120-year might be more associated with natural variability. This multi-decadal change of relationship between ENSO and IOD can also be seen from MC’s SO land precipitation (Fig. 4a). In fact, the relationship between the strength of ENSO and the strength of IOD also has multi-decadal variations (Fig. S2). A series of numerical experiments can be utilized to understand the factors (such as global warming15,33,36, natural decadal variabilities22,23,37, anthropogenic land use changes38) controlling the multi-decadal change of the relationship between ENSO and IOD, which will be critical for understanding the fire occurrence frequency in this region in the future. Except for the impacts of coincident El Niño-pIOD events, the recent 2019 drought is caused by an extreme pIOD-only event. The 2019 extreme pIOD-only event is associated with global warming39, implying the importance of future pIOD events.
Datasets and methods
The precipitation datasets used were sourced from the 0.5° × 0.5° Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) Full Data Monthly Analysis Version 202040, which was constructed from ground observations, the 1° × 1° Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature dataset version 1 (HadISST1)41, the 0.25° × 0.25° Global Fire Emissions Database version 4 (GFEDv4s)42 and the 1.25° × 1.25° Twentieth Century Reanalysis dataset43 from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. We select the period 1900 to 2019 to examine precipitation and SST and the period 1900 to 2010 for the atmospheric circulation analysis. Another monthly gridded precipitation dataset from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU)44, and the fifth version of Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSSTv5)45 were also examined. The details of these reanalysis datasets are listed in Table 1. To understand the degree of drought during different years, we calculated terrestrial water storage (TWS) changes during the study period. We examined simulated TWS from the Community Land Model (CLM5.0)46, which was forced with atmospheric observations. The experiment period was 1900 to 2015, and simulations of the last 105 years—that is, from 1911 to 2015—were utilized. To explore whether global warming might have a substantial impact on precipitation variations in the MC in the future, we examined the results from 18 models (listed in Table 2) in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project—Phase 5 (CMIP5).
Long-term linear trends and annual cycles were removed from the original datasets. We use the dipole mode index (DMI)10 and Niño3.4 index47 to represent IOD and ENSO activities, respectively. A pIOD event was identified when the mean values of the IOD index exceed one standard deviation for the June-July–August (JJA) or September–October-November (SON) season. An ENSO event was identified when the mean value of Niño3.4 SST exceeds one standard deviation for the November–December-January season. When an El Niño event and a pIOD event occur during the same year, they are referred to as a coincident El Niño-pIOD event. Conversely, El Niño-only and pIOD-only events refer, respectively, to an El Niño event occurring without an IOD event and a pIOD event occurring without an ENSO event. Table 3 shows the years of the pIOD-only, El Niño-only, and coincident El Niño-pIOD events during 1900–2019.
Those data used in this study can be obtained from GPCC: https://opendata.dwd.de/climate_environment/GPCC/html/download_gate.html; CRU https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/ The HadISST data are available from https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadisst/ The ERSST data are available from https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C00927. The ERA20C are available from https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era-20c. The GFEDv4 data are available from https://daac.ornl.gov/VEGETATION/guides/fire_emissions_v4_R1.html. All the data processing and figures code can be downloaded in the Github (https://github.com/hm-xiao/Combined-Effects-of-ENSO-and-IOD-on-the-Maritime-Continent-s-Land-Precipitation-During-SO-code/tree/main).
Field, R. D., van der Werf, G. R. & Shen, S. S. P. Human amplification of drought-induced biomass burning in Indonesia since 1960. Nat. Geosci. 2, 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo443 (2009).
Taufik, M. et al. Amplification of wildfire area burnt by hydrological drought in the humid tropics. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 428–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3280 (2017).
Kim, J.-S., Jeong, S.-J., Kug, J.-S. & Williams, M. Role of local air-sea interaction in fire activity over equatorial Asia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 14789–14797. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085943 (2019).
Fanin, T. & van der Werf, G. R. Precipitation–fire linkages in Indonesia (1997–2015). Biogeosciences 14, 3995–4008. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3995-2017 (2017).
Chen, C.-C., Lin, H.-W., Yu, J.-Y. & Lo, M.-H. The 2015 Borneo fires: What have we learned from the 1997 and 2006 El Niños?. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 104003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/104003 (2016).
Nurutami, M. N. & Hidayat, R. Influences of IOD and ENSO to Indonesian rainfall variability: Role of atmosphere-ocean interaction in the Indo-Pacific sector. Procedia Environ. Sci. 33, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.070 (2016).
Hendon, H. H. Indonesian rainfall variability: Impacts of ENSO and local air-sea interaction. J. Clim. 16, 1775–1790. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016%3c1775:IRVIOE%3e2.0.CO;2 (2003).
Yamagata, T. et al. In Earth's Climate 189–211 (2004).
Webster, P. J., Moore, A. M., Loschnigg, J. P. & Leben, R. R. Coupled ocean–atmosphere dynamics in the Indian Ocean during 1997–98. Nature 401, 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/43848 (1999).
Saji, N. H., Goswami, B. N., Vinayachandran, P. N. & Yamagata, T. A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean. Nature 401, 360–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/43854 (1999).
Pan, X., Chin, M., Ichoku, C. M. & Field, R. D. Connecting Indonesian fires and drought with the type of El Niño and phase of the Indian Ocean dipole during 1979–2016. J. Geophys. Res. 123, 7974–7988. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028402 (2018).
Hamada, J.-I. et al. Interannual rainfall variability over northwestern Jawa and its relation to the Indian Ocean dipole and El Niño-Southern Oscillation Events. SOLA 8, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2012-018 (2012).
Yu, J.-Y. & Lau, K. M. Contrasting Indian Ocean SST variability with and without ENSO influence: A coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM study. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 90, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-004-0094-7 (2005).
Yang, Y. et al. Seasonality and predictability of the Indian Ocean dipole mode: ENSO forcing and internal variability. J. Clim. 28, 8021–8036. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0078.1 (2015).
Luo, J.-J. et al. Interaction between El Niño and extreme Indian Ocean dipole. J. Clim. 23, 726–742. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3104.1 (2010).
Behera, S. K. et al. A CGCM Study on the Interaction between IOD and ENSO. J. Clim. 19, 1688–1705. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3797.1 (2006).
Annamalai, H., Xie, S. P., McCreary, J. P. & Murtugudde, R. Impact of Indian Ocean sea surface temperature on developing El Niño. J. Clim. 18, 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3268.1 (2005).
Yuan, D., Zhou, H. & Zhao, X. Interannual climate variability over the tropical Pacific Ocean induced by the Indian Ocean dipole through the Indonesian throughflow. J. Clim. 26, 2845–2861. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00117.1 (2013).
Lau, N.-C. & Nath, M. J. The role of the “atmospheric bridge” in linking tropical pacific ENSO events to extratropical SST anomalies. J. Clim. 9, 2036–2057 (1996).
Klein, S. A., Soden, B. J. & Lau, N.-C. Remote sea surface temperature variations during ENSO: Evidence for a tropical atmospheric bridge. J. Clim. 12, 917. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012%3c0917:Rsstvd%3e2.0.Co;2 (1999).
Alexander, M. A. et al. The atmospheric bridge: The influence of ENSO teleconnections on air-sea interaction over the global oceans. J. Clim. 15, 2205. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3c2205:Tabtio%3e2.0.Co;2 (2002).
Yu, J.-Y., Paek, H., Saltzman, E. S. & Lee, T. The early 1990s change in ENSO–PSA–SAM relationships and its impact on southern hemisphere climate. J. Clim. 28, 9393–9408. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0335.1 (2015).
Yu, J.-Y. et al. Linking emergence of the central Pacific El Niño to the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation. J. Clim. 28, 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00347.1 (2015).
Capotondi, A. et al. Understanding ENSO diversity. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 96, 921–938. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00117.1 (2015).
Ashok, K., Behera, S. K., Rao, S. A., Weng, H. & Yamagata, T. . El. Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798 (2007).
Yu, J.-Y. & Kao, H.-Y. Decadal changes of ENSO persistence barrier in SST and ocean heat content indices: 1958–2001. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007654 (2007).
Kao, H.-Y. & Yu, J.-Y. Contrasting eastern-Pacific and central-Pacific types of ENSO. J. Clim. 22, 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2309.1 (2009).
Ashok, K. & Yamagata, T. The El Niño with a difference. Nature 461, 481–484. https://doi.org/10.1038/461481a (2009).
Curran, L. M. et al. Impact of El Niño and logging on canopy tree recruitment in Borneo. Science 286, 2184–2188. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5447.2184 (1999).
Turetsky, M. R. et al. Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss. Nat. Geosci. 8, 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2325 (2015).
Lo, M.-H. & Famiglietti, J. S. Effect of water table dynamics on land surface hydrologic memory. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014191 (2010).
Yu, J.-Y., Wang, X., Yang, S., Paek, H. & Chen, M. In Climate Extremes 1–38 (2017).
Wang, B. et al. Historical change of El Niño properties sheds light on future changes of extreme El Niño. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 22512–22517. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911130116 (2019).
Behera, S. K. & Yamagata, T. Influence of the Indian Ocean dipole on the southern oscillation. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. II 81, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.81.169 (2003).
Ashok, K., Guan, Z. & Yamagata, T. Impact of the Indian Ocean dipole on the relationship between the Indian monsoon rainfall and ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 4499–4502. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013294 (2001).
Cai, W. et al. Increasing frequency of extreme El Niño events due to greenhouse warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2100 (2014).
Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Jin, F.-F., Stuecker, M. F. & Turner, A. G. Impact of different El Niño types on the El Niño/IOD relationship. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8570–8576. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065703 (2015).
Chen, C.-C. et al. Thermodynamic and dynamic responses to deforestation in the maritime continent: A modeling study. J. Clim. 32, 3505–3527. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-18-0310.1 (2019).
Wang, G., Cai, W., Yang, K., Santoso, A. & Yamagata, T. A unique feature of the 2019 extreme positive Indian ocean dipole Event. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088615. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088615 (2020).
Schneider, U. et al. GPCC’s new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 115, 15–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-0860-x (2014).
Rayner, N. A. et al. Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670 (2003).
Randerson, J. T., Van Der Werf, G. R., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J. & Kasibhatla, P. S. (ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, 2017).
Poli, P. et al. ERA-20C: An atmospheric reanalysis of the twentieth century. J. Clim. 29, 4083–4097. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0556.1 (2016).
Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P. & Lister, D. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci. Data 7, 109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3 (2020).
Huang, B. et al. Extended reconstructed sea surface temperature, version 5 (ERSSTv5): Upgrades, validations, and intercomparisons. J. Clim. 30, 8179–8205. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0836.1 (2017).
Lawrence, D. M. et al. The community land model version 5: Description of new features, benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 4245–4287. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583 (2019).
Kug, J. S., An, S.-I., Jin, F.-F. & Kang, I.-S. Preconditions for El Niño and La Niña onsets and their relation to the Indian Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021674 (2005).
This study was supported by the MOST 106-2111-M-002-010-MY4 and 110-2628-M-002-004-MY4 to National Taiwan University. Jin-Yi Yu is supported by the National Science Foundation of the United States (Grant Nos. AGS-1833075 and AGS-2109539). The precipitation datasets are from Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) and from Climatic Research Unit (CRU). The SST datasets are from the Met Office Hadley Centre (Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature data set, HadISST) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature, ERSST). The fire datasets are from DISTRIBUTED ACTIVE ARCHIVE CENTER FORE BIOGEOCHEMICAL DYNAMICS (ORNL DAAC). We use the Twentieth Century Reanalysis dataset (ERA20C) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The numerical model simulations are based on CESM version 2.0 with CLM version 5 with prescribed sea surface temperature and atmospheric forcing, accessible from https://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/. We sincerely acknowledge Miss Ting-Hui Lee, Miss Chu-Chun Chen, Mr. Hsin Hsu, and Mr. Ren-Jie Wu for the fruitful discussion. This article was subsidized for English editing by National Taiwan University under the Excellence Improvement Program for Doctoral Students (grant number 108-2926-I-002-002-MY4), sponsored by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, HM., Lo, MH. & Yu, JY. The increased frequency of combined El Niño and positive IOD events since 1965s and its impacts on maritime continent hydroclimates. Sci Rep 12, 7532 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11663-1
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.