Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Bio-strengthening of cementitious composites from incinerated sugarcane filter cake by a calcifying bacterium Lysinibacillus sp. WH

Abstract

This study investigated Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) technology to improve the mechanical properties of cementitious composites containing incinerated sugarcane filter cake (IFC) using a calcifying bacterium Lysinibacillus sp. WH. Both IFC obtained after the first and second clarification processes, referred to as white (IWFC) and black (IBFC), were experimented. This is the first work to investigate the use of IBFC as a cement replacement. According to the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) results, the main element of IWFC and IBFC was CaO (91.52%) and SiO2 (58.80%), respectively. This is also the first work to investigate the use of IBFC as a cement replacement. We found that the addition of strain WH could further enhance the strength of both cementitious composites up to ~ 31%, while reduced water absorption and void. Microstructures of the composites were visualized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The cement hydration products were determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) followed by Rietveld analysis. The results indicated that biogenic CaCO3 was the main composition in enhancing strength of the IBFC composite, whereas induce tricalcium silicate (C3S) formation promoting the strength of IWFC composite. This work provided strong evidence that the mechanical properties of the cementitious composites could be significantly improved through the application of MICP. In fact, the strength of IFC-based cementitious composites after boosting by strain WH is only 10% smaller than that of the conventional Portland cement. While using IFC as a cement substitute is a greener way to produce environmentally friendly materials, it also provides a solution to long-term agro-industrial waste pollution problems.

Introduction

Cement has become one of the most widely used building materials in the last century due to its durability and low cost1. However, a rise in cement consumption has resulted in a global environmental problem. Cement production accounts for approximately 6% of total anthropogenic CO2 emissions and 50% of total CO2 emissions from the building construction and operation sector worldwide. The high amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is due to an intensive use of energy during kiln production process (70–80%) and a consumption of non-renewable resources, causing global warming2,3,4.

With growing concern about reducing the environmental problem caused by CO2 emissions, as well as prolonging life and improving durability of cement-based materials, biocement has emerged as a potential solution. Several agro-industrial wastes can be used as cement substitutes such as sugarcane straw ash5, rice husk ash6, wheat straw ash7, corn cob ash8, wood shaving9, paper mill sludge ash, sugarcane bagasse ash10 and sugarcane filter cake from juice clarification processes in the sugar industry11.

After rice and rubber trees, the sugar industry is crucial to Thailand's economic development12. Thailand is one of the top five sugar producing countries in the world13. There are 16 sugar factories in the Northeast, and the sugar industry is the region's major focus12. During sugar production, one of the main solid wastes is sugarcane filter cake14,15. In this study, we would like to use sugarcane filter cake as a cement replacement because the sugar industry generates a large amount of filter cakes as waste. There are two different types of filter cakes inspected here, including the one obtained from the first and the second clarification processes, which are referred to, based on their color, as “black” and “white” filter cake, respectively. While white filter cake has been used as a cement clinker and cement replacement in concrete16,17, the study on engineering applications of the black filter cake is still limited (e.g. no applications for producing value-added products).

Sua-Iam and Makul11 investigated the use of Incinerated Sugarcane Filter Cake (IFC) by looking at its effects on the properties of self-compacting concrete mixed with ordinary Portland cement as a cement replacement. They used IFC at 10, 20, 30 and 40% by weight of cement. Their results showed that when IFC was added to the cement mixture, the density and compressive strength of the self-compacting concrete (SCC) mixture decreased noticeably in all conditions. Furthermore, when cement was replaced with IFC, the water absorption of the hardened SCC after curing treatment was significantly greater than that of the control concrete (without IFC replacement). Although using IFC as a cement replacement is, of course, more environmentally friendly, it is clear that the qualities of the materials become lower than those without IFC replacement.

Much recent research has focused on the use of biological substances to improve the mechanical properties of cementitious materials, particularly calcifying bacteria, or what is known as microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP)18,19,20,21. A diverse range of bacterial groups play an important role in MICP and have the potential to be used as biocement additives and self-healing agents in cementitious materials. Microbial repair mechanisms occur through the bio-deposition of CaCO3, demonstrating an improvement in the mechanical and durability properties of cement-based materials. Moreover, MICP bacteria can withstand mechanical stress during cement mixing and remain viable in high alkalinity environments, which is a characteristic of cement materials22. Furthermore, the use of this biological repair technology is highly preferred because the mineral precipitation generated by bacterial activities is safer to the environment than its chemical counterpart22,23. Due to its environmentally friendly nature, we are interested in using calcifying bacteria to enhance the strength of the cement partially replaced by IFC. In addition, many topics have been discussed about MICP bacteria mostly for concrete and mortar application, but very limited studies have conducted in the cementitious composite systems, especially when agro-industrial wastes are incorporated.

One of the most important characteristics of Lysinibacillus spp. is that they have the ability to form spores that can survive under harsh environments (i.e. high alkalinity, limited nutrients, etc.) such as in the building materials. Furthermore, despite the fact that urea hydrolysis is the simplest of these metabolic processes and its pathway has received the most attention due to its efficiency for MICP productivity, urea hydrolysis generates ammonia as a byproduct, raising the risk of steel corrosion in reinforced concrete. As a result, non-ureolytic reactions become more appealing for practical applications. There have only been a few reports of bacterial genus Lysinibacillus spp. being capable of precipitating CaCO319,24,25,26,27,28. Ekprasert et al.19 studied the mechanical properties of biocement containing a newly isolated Lysinibacillus sp. WH capable of precipitating CaCO3 via non-ureolytic processes by using calcium acetate, calcium chloride and calcium nitrate as a calcium source. Note that strain WH was grown in the absence of urea, the possible mechanism for it to precipitate CaCO3 is likely to be the deamination of yeast extract presented in B4 medium29. They found that Lysinibacillus sp. WH could increase the compressive strength of cement by 40–50% compared to the control (Portland cement). Therefore, due to the ability of strain WH to enhance compressive strength of the cement, it is assumed that the incorporation of this bacterium into the cement composites in this work would help compensate the loss of strength as a result of IFC replacement.

Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, previous literature revealed no studies on the production of biocement incorporating both IFC as a cement replacement and calcifying bacteria from the genus Lysinibacillus spp. as a cement addition. The aim of this study is, therefore, to investigate the effects of biogenic CaCO3 produced by Lysinibacillus sp. WH on the physical properties, including compressive strength, water absorption and void of biocement containing IFC (both white and black filter cake). We then discussed the results towards the potential use of filter cake as a cement replacement in biocement application.

Methods

Preparation of incinerated sugarcane filter cake

Black and white sugarcane filter cakes were obtained from Khon Kaen Sugar Industry Public Company Limited in Khon Kaen and Erawon Sugar Company Limited in Nong Bua Lamphu, Thailand, respectively. Both types of filter cakes were incinerated in an electrical furnace at 850 ± 20 °C for 3 h by increasing the temperature at a rate of 10 °C/min. The incinerated black and white sugarcane filter cake (IFC) were allowed to cool at room temperature before sieving using a sieve with a mesh size of ≤ 5 mm.

Preparation of bacterial culture for mixing into biocement

Lysinibacillus sp. strain WH used in this study was isolated from saline soil samples collected from an abandoned paddy field in Surin province, Thailand. Genus identification of this bacterium was carried out based on its 16S rRNA sequence as previously reported by Ekprasert et al.19. Lysinibacillus sp. strain WH was grown in B4 medium (per liter: 4 g yeast extract, 5 g dextrose, 2.5 g calcium acetate, adjust pH to 8.2)30 to induce CaCO3 precipitation. The pH of the B4 medium was adjusted from 7 to 8.2 by adding 1 N NaOH in order to obtain an optimum pH for CaCO3 precipitation. The cultures were incubated with shaking at 150 rpm, 30 °C for 4 days, which was the optimum incubation time for CaCO3 precipitation19. Then, the cultures were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 15 min to collect cell pellets. Concentrations of bacterial cultures were quantified using a plate count method prior to use in biocement.

Biocement preparation

Biocement samples were set up into 6 treatments as indicated in Table 1. In the treatment which Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was replaced, the replacement ratio was 10% w/w of either incinerated white filter cake (IWFC) or incinerated black filter cake (IBFC). Bacterial culture concentration was determined by the plate count method. Then, 1 mL of 108 CFU of bacteria, which were mostly vegetative cells, was added into each cement cube mixture. Biocement in each treatment was set up in triplicate per sampling time per analysis. OPC, bacterial cells and IFC were mixed with tap water at a water:cement ratio of 0.5. The cement mixture was casted in a cement mold size of 50 × 50 × 50 mm3 and then allowed to harden at room temperature for 24 h. The sample cubes were demolded and cured in tap water for 28 days. Biocement cubes were sampled at the age of 1, 7, 14 and 28 days for water absorption and compressive strength tests.

Table 1 Compositions of cementitious composites in each treatment.

Water absorption test and determination of volume of permeable pore space (voids)

Water absorption test was conducted according to the ASTM C642-13 standard procedure31. Briefly, tree replicate of biocement specimens were dried in a hot-air oven at 110 ± 5 °C for 24 h. The specimens were cooled down and dried at a temperature of 20 to 25 °C prior to weighing (The Oven-Dry-Mass Value (A)). After that, the specimens were immersed in tap water for 48 h at a temperature of 21 °C. The surface of the specimens was dried using a water absorbent towel prior to determining the Saturated Mass After Immersion (B). Then, the specimens were placed in a container, covered with tap water, and boiled for 5 h. The specimens were cooled down for at least 14 h or until their temperature was approximately 20–25 °C. The surface moisture was removed with a towel and the mass of the specimens was determined as the Saturated Mass After Boiling (C). After immersion and boiling in the tap water, the specimens were weighed under water to determine the Immersed Apparent Mass value (D). The water absorption and void were calculated using the Eqs. (1) and (2) as follows:

$$Water absorption \left( \% \right) = \left[ {\frac{{\left( {B - A} \right)}}{A}} \right] \times 100$$
(1)
$$Voids \left( \% \right) = \frac{{\left( {C - A} \right)}}{{\left( {C - D} \right)}} \times 100$$
(2)

Compressive strength test

Cement cube samples (three replicate) were tested for compressive strength according to ASTM C109 standard32 using a CBN compression testing machine (CBN Testing Corporation, Thailand). The crushed cements were powdered for Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM)

Precipitates from 4-day bacterial culture were collected by centrifugation. Then, biogenic calcite was separated from bacterial cells by filtration through a Whatman No.1 filter paper (Whatman, Merck, Germany). The precipitates left on the filter were washed with sterile water and then dried in a hot air oven at 45 °C until completely dry before being examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). SEM analysis was performed with OPC, biogenic CaCO3, IWFC, IBFC and the biocement specimens at the age of 28 days. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM; FEI Model, Helios NanoLab G3 CX, USA) was used to visualize crystal morphology of the samples.

Quantitative XRD analysis

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was used to determine the mineralogical compositions of the cement hydration products in biocement samples. The cement specimens were grounded to powder and then subjected to XRD analysis using X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D2 Phaser, USA). The spectra were scanned in a range of 10°–80°. Then, the ratio of each phase was determined according to the Rietveld refinement method using Profex software.

Physical and chemical analysis

The elemental compositions of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), fresh black sugarcane filter cake (BFC), fresh white sugarcane filter cake (WFC), black incinerated sugarcane filter cake (IBFC) and white incinerated sugarcane filter cake (IWFC) were determined using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) (Horiba XGT-5200 X-Ray Analytical Microscope, UK). Physical characteristics including loss on ignition (LOI) and surface area and pore size distribution of those materials were analyzed using Thermogravimetric (TGA) and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis. TGA was performed using a Thermogravimetric analyzer (Mettler Toledo Model TGA/DSC1, USA) under nitrogen gas with heating from 25 to 600 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min33. BET analysis was carried out using a BET analyzer (Bell Model Belsorp mini, Japan) using N2 gas as gaseous adsorbate.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) based on the least significant difference (LSD) at p-value of 0.05 was used to determine significant differences among the mean values. The Statistix 10.0 program was used for all statistical analysis.

Results

Physical and chemical properties of raw materials

Chemical compounds in our raw materials based on the results of an X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis are presented in Table 2. The main compositions of OPC were CaO (62.49%) and SiO2 (25.22%) with minor ratios of other compounds. XRF analysis results also showed that IWFC consisted mainly of CaO (91.52%), which is also the main component of cement. Therefore, it is reasonable to be used as a cement replacement. Differently, IBFC mainly consisted of SiO2 (58.80%) and a small amount of CaO (7.69%) with a minority of other constituents. The results obtained from thermogravimetric analysis indicated that the loss on ignition (LOI) of OPC, IWFC and IBFC were 4.91%, 8.56% and 0.30%, respectively. Moreover, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis showed that both IWFC and IBFC had smaller specific surface areas (0.97 cm2/g and 0.52 cm2/g, respectively) than the OPC (1.06 cm2/g). However, mean pore diameter and total pore volume of IWFC and IBFC were less than those of the OPC. In this regard, IWFC had a smaller pore diameter (29.60 nm) but a larger total pore volume (7.1610–3 cm3/g) than those of the IBFC (39.29 nm and 5.1110–3 cm3/g). These results suggested that IWFC was more porous than IBFC.

Table 2 Chemical compositions and physical properties of the OPC (ordinary Portland cement); WFC (White filter cake); IWFC (Incinerated white filter cake); BFC (Black filter cake) and IBFC (Incinerated black filter cake).

Surface morphology of OPC, IWFC, IBFC and also biogenic CaCO3 is shown in Fig. 1. The size of all raw materials was approximately in the same range of ~ 10–50 µm with a rough surface. Biogenic CaCO3 crystals produced by strain WH (Fig. 1b) were in the form of calcite with porous surface due to bacterial cell imprints, which agreed with our previous study19.

Figure 1
figure 1

SEM micrographs (10,000X magnification) of raw materials used for producing cementitious composites; (a): OPC powder, (b): biogenic CaCO3 produced by Lysinibacillus sp. strain WH, (c): IWFC powder and (d): IBFC powder. White arrows indicate bacterial cell imprints.

Compressive strength test result

Compressive strength of cementitious composites was determined at the age of 1, 7, 14 and 28 days, as in e.g. Pavlík et al.34, Chindaprasirt et al.35, Mawardi et al.36. The results showed that the cement strength increased with increasing curing time in all specimens (Fig. 2). After 28 days of curing, the highest strength of cement was found in the OPC+WH (51.42 MPa), ensuring the ability of strain WH and its biogenic CaCO3 to enhance strength of the cement. It was found that the incorporation of both types of IFC (OPC+IWFC and OPC+IBFC) in cement resulted in a significant decrease in compressive strength at the age of 28 days when compared to the strength of the OPC. As expected, the replacement of IFC negatively affected the compressive strength of Portland cement. Interestingly, a reduction of cement strength due to IFC replacement could be overcome by the addition of strain WH and its CaCO3. It was found that OPC+IWFC+WH had a compressive strength of ~ 31% greater than that of the OPC+IWFC (Fig. 2a). Likewise, the strength of the OPC+IBFC+WH was ~ 12% higher than that of OPC+IBFC at 28 days of age (Fig. 2b). Moreover, the addition of strain WH could significantly increase compressive strength of the OPC+IWFC and the OPC+IBFC at the age of 7 days. This suggested that biogenic CaCO3 from strain WH is responsible for early strength of cement.

Figure 2
figure 2

Compressive strength of cementitious composites containing incinerated white filter cake (IWFC) (a) and incinerated black filter cake (IBFC) (b). Error bars represent standard deviations of the data. Different letters above the bars indicate significant difference at p-value < 0.05 when compared using the Least Significant Difference method (LSD). Data with different letters are significantly different.

Water absorption test result

Figure 3 showed the effects of strain WH on the water absorption of cementitious composites at different curing times. The water absorption of all specimens decreased with increasing curing time. The level of water absorption of the OPC+IWFC and the OPC+IBFC was not significantly different from that of the OPC. This suggested that the partial replacement of cement with either IWFC or IBFC (10% by weight) did not affect water absorption properties of the cement. It was found that the presence of strain WH in cement (OPC+WH) caused a reduction in water absorption to ~ 18%, which accounted for ~ 15% reduction compared to the control (OPC). Similarly, the effect of strain WH to reduce water absorption was also pronounced with the cement partially replaced with IFC. The results showed that, after 28 days of curing, the OPC+IWFC+WH had a water absorption of ~ 6% less than that of the OPC+IWFC (Fig. 3a). Interestingly, the addition of strain WH into the OPC+IBFC (OPC+IBFC+WH) caused ~ 28% reduction in water absorption when compared to that of the OPC+IBFC at the age of 28 days (Fig. 3b). Accordingly, the water absorption of the OPC+IWFC+WH and the OPC+IBFC + WH was even lower than that of the conventional cement (OPC). These results strongly suggest that strain WH played an important role in reducing water absorption of either cement or cement replaced with IFC.

Figure 3
figure 3

Water absorption of cementitious composites containing IWFC (a) and IBFC (b). Error bars represent standard deviations of the data. Different letters above the bars indicate significant difference at p-value < 0.05 when compared using the Least Significant Difference method (LSD). Data with different letters are significantly different.

Volume of permeable pore space (Void) result

The minimum void of cementitious material is a desirable property reflecting the durability of the material. The %void of all biocements is presented in Fig. 4. The results showed that %void decreased with curing time increased. The void ratio of OPC+WH (~ 30%) was significantly lower than that of the OPC (~ 34%) at 28-day age, suggesting that strain WH had a potential to reduce void in the cement. The replacement of cement by either IWFC or IBFC (OPC+IWFC and OPC+IBFC) caused an increase in %void when compared to the OPC even after 28 days of curing. This was probably because the shapes of both IFC particles (see SEM images in Fig. 1c and d) were irregular, resulting in spaces in between microparticles due to their incomplete compaction. Nevertheless, we found that the addition of strain WH into the materials could help reduce those voids. In this regard, the OPC+IWFC+WH exhibited significantly less void than the OPC+IWFC (Fig. 4a), which accounted for ~ 14% reduction in void ratio. Likewise, a notably decrease of ~ 27% in void ratio was found in the OPC+IBFC+WH, when compared to the OPC+IBFC (Fig. 4b) at the age of 28 days. The %void of ~ 31% and ~ 27% of the OPC+IWFC+WH and OPC+IBFC+WH, respectively, were even lower than that of the OPC (34%). This suggested that the added strain WH could efficiently fill pore space within the cement either with or without IFC replacement. All of these results indicated that although the replacement of cement with IFC might demote the physical properties of hardened cement, the addition of strain WH could effectively enhance those properties to its original status (i.e., water absorption and void), and even better than the conventional cement (OPC).

Figure 4
figure 4

Void (%) of cementitious composites containing IWFC (a) and IBFC (b). Error bars represent standard deviations of the data. Different letters above the bars indicate significant difference at p-value < 0.05 when compared using the Least Significant Difference method (LSD). Data with different letters are significantly different.

Scanning electron microscope analysis of cementitious composites

Figure 5 illustrated SEM images of the hardened cement of all treatments. It was evidenced that the cement added with strain WH (Fig. 5b, d and f) had relatively larger particle sizes than their corresponding cement without bacterial addition. This could explain how biogenic calcium carbonate affects cement strength. Biogenic CaCO3 might interact with alite causing an acceleration of C3S formation, as evidenced by an increase in the size of the microaggregates constituting the biocement. Furthermore, as a cement additive, biogenic calcium carbonate could have a filler effect, in which pores within the cement materials were plugged. As a result, the incorporation of bacterial cells and their biogenic CaCO3 in biocement could explain the increase in biocement strength. To investigate how strain WH affected cement hydration products, quantitative XRD analysis was performed, which is presented in the next section.

Figure 5
figure 5

SEM micrographs (10,000X magnification) of cementitious composites at the age of 28 days; (a): OPC, (b): OPC+WH, (c): OPC+IWFC, (d): OPC+IWFC+WH, (e): OPC+IBFC and (f): OPC+IBFC+WH.

Quantitative of X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) of cementitious composites.

The Rietveld refinement analysis was performed to determine ratios of each cement hydration product in cementitious composites. Table 3 showed that biogenic CaCO3 in the OPC+WH specimen could induce the formation of ettringite via the hydration of tricalcium aluminate (C3A), as evidenced by a decrease in gypsum and an increase in ettringite when compared to those of the OPC. The use of IWFC, which is mostly composed of CaO, as a cement replacement caused an increase in the ettringite content of the OPC+IWFC when compared to that of the OPC. The presence of biogenic CaCO3 from strain WH in the OPC+IWFC+WH likely reduced carbonation of portlandite into CaCO3, while induced the formation of C3S (alite). In the case of cementitious composite containing IBFC, the results showed that the material had a lower amount of calcite but a slightly higher amount of C3S than those of the OPC. An excess SiO2 of ~ 10% was also found in this specimen, which possibly derived from the incorporation of IBFC in the material. Interestingly, the addition of strain WH into OPC+IBFC+WH yielded a much higher CaCO3 content but lower in C3S than the OPC+IBFC. This suggested that an increase in CaCO3 was likely due to the added biogenic CaCO3.

Table 3 Percentage of mineral compositions in cementitious composites analyzed by Rietveld Refinement method.

In the sample containing incinerated black filter cake (IBFC), the effect of biogenic CaCO3 on the cement hydration product was observed. Table 3 showed that the calcite content is higher than the C3S content, which counted for ~ 17% and ~ 14%, respectively in the OPC+IBFC+WH sample. Besides, the extra CaCO3 produced by bacteria may result in the formation of ettringite. Moreover, the biogenic CaCO3 may delay or even inhibit the carbonation process, as evidenced by a consistent amount of portlandite and an ~ 8% increase in calcite compared to the control sample without the presence of calcium carbonate from bacteria. Furthermore, X-ray diffraction (XRD) quantitative analysis revealed a 9.6% excess of silicon dioxide (SiO2) in the control sample (OPC+IBFC).

Discussion

In this work, two different types of filter cakes were incinerated and then used as a cement replacement. Lysinibacillus sp. WH, a CaCO3-producing bacterium19, was mixed with cement as an additive aiming to compensate for a reduction of some physical properties of the cement due to IFC replacement. XRF analysis showed that the main element in IWFC was CaO (91.25%), one of the major constituents in Portland cement, allowing it a promising cement replacement. The TGA results showed that LOI of IWFC (8.56%) was much lower than that of WFC (21.22%), so the incineration condition was appropriate for preparing IWFC for use. There have been only a few studies investigating the use of IWFC as a cement replacement11,17 and lime-based materials37. Those studies indicated that the compressive strength of self-compacting concrete and cellular lightweight concrete reduced with increasing IWFC replacement ratio, while 10% by weight of IWFC replacement was the most desirable ratio due to good spreadability17. Moreover, the IWFC replacement ratio of less than 20% could enhance C3S formation, the main phase for cement strength development16. Our work, therefore, selected 10% IWFC as a ratio for cement replacement and then studied the effects of strain WH to improve cement strength.

Different chemical compositions were found in the case of IBFC. The main composition of IBFC was SiO2 (58.80%) with a minor amount of CaO (7.69%) and other elements. The summation of AlO2, SiO2 and Fe2O3 of 68.27% and the amount of SO3 of 0.33% in IBFC meets the requirement of the ASTM C618-15 standard characteristics of raw or calcined natural pozzolanic materials38. Due to its low content of CaO and the sum of AlO2, SiO2 and Fe2O3 as high as ~ 70%, IBFC has a chemical property desirably comparable to that of Class N pozzolans, which is highly reactive towards excess lime formed during the cement hydration38. Moreover, its LOI of as low as 0.30% also meets the ASTM C618 standard (< 12%), allowing it a good candidate for being a pozzolanic material. Therefore, IBFC has a potential for being used as a cement replacement, in which our work is the first to investigate this.

Despite different pore diameters and total pore volumes of both IFC, %void of OPC+IWFC and OPC+IBFC were not much different and only slightly higher than that of the OPC. This suggested that a replacement of cement with both types of IFC did not affect %void of the materials. Note that although the pore space of IBFC itself was very low (as can be seen from Fig. 1), %void of OPC+IBFC was higher than that of the OPC. This was likely caused by the occurrence of pore spaces between OPC and IBFC particles due to non-homogenous incorporation of the two particles within the material matrix. Furthermore, we found that strain WH could enhance strength of the cement replaced with IFC, while also reduce water absorption (Fig. 3) and %void (Fig. 4). Although the curing process had a significant effect on the reduction of water absorption of the OPC+IFC, the addition of strain WH (OPC+IWFC+WH and OPC+IBFC+WH) could further reduce water absorption down to the level even less than that of the OPC. This is because strain WH and its biogenic CaCO3 could fill up the pores, thus preventing water permeability of the materials. This effect was correlated to a decrease in %void after 28 days of curing. Our findings were in agreement with other previous works indicating that biogenic CaCO3 can fill and clog the pores, resulting in a decrease in the percentage of void values25,39,40. However, pore-filling effect due to biogenic CaCO3 was more pronounced when using IBFC as a cement replacement than when using IWFC. This is because CaO has both positive and negative effects on cement hydration41. The desirable properties of cementitious materials including high strength, low water absorption and limited pore volume are obtained not only from the reaction of CaO, but also the formation of ettringite and the nucleation reactions of the cement replacement materials42.

According to XRD analysis results, we found that the presence of biogenic CaCO3 could induce the formation of ettringite in cement samples through the hydration of tricalcium aluminate (C3A) which can prevent a rapid hardening of cement, as shown in the Eq. (3). Although CaCO3 was regarded as an inert filler to cementitious materials43,44,45, recent studies found its positive chemical effects causing the formation of additional ettringite46,47. CaCO3 can transform monosulfate of the AFm phases (Al2O3-Fe2O3-mono), a form of hydration product, into hemicarboaluminate and/or monocarboaluminate phases together with additional formation of ettringite, one of the AFt phases (Al2O3-Fe2O3-tri). This reaction then results in an increase in total volume of solid phase in the cement matrix, causing an increase of compressive strength46,47,48.

$$C_{3} A + gypsum \to ettringite$$
(3)

The results also showed that the calcite content in the OPC+IWFC was higher than that of the OPC+IWFC+WH even though biogenic CaCO3 was added in the latter material. This might be due to the additional formation of CaCO3 could be induced by the acceleration of the carbonation process caused by C3S49. This was likely the case in our materials as was evidenced by the presence of a lower C3S content in the OPC+IWFC than in the OPC+IWFC+WH. Moreover, our biogenic CaCO3 could accelerate the formation of C3S in the sample containing IWFC (OPC+IWFC+WH), in which its compressive strength was higher than that of the OPC+IWFC. This is because the bacterial cells and its biogenic CaCO3 can also act as nucleation surfaces for the formation of cement hydration products50. However, the presence of too much CaO, which is the main composition of IWFC, in the composite OPC+IWFC can cause cement expansion and disintegration, resulting in the loss of strength51. This is the reason why the strength of the OPC+IWFC was lower than that of the OPC. Note that a considerable improvement of compressive strength of the IWFC-cement composite could be obtained by the addition of our strain WH.

In the case of IBFC-cement composites, the strength of the OPC+IBFC was lower than that of the OPC. This might be due to an excess of SiO2, the main composition of IBFC, could partially substitute the matrix of cementitious material, resulting in a reduction in strength52. The presence of biogenic CaCO3 from strain WH in the OPC+IBFC+WH composite could induce the formation of ettringite and likely to inhibit the carbonation process, as evidenced by a consistent amount of portlandite and an increase in calcite content (Table 3). Furthermore, an increase in calcite content (17%) in the OPC+IBFC+WH indicated that its strength is primarily influenced by calcite (CaCO3), which additionally derived from the bacteria strain WH, rather than C3S. This implied that strain WH and its biogenic CaCO3 had a direct effect, both physical and chemical, in increasing strength of IFC-cementitious composites.

All of these results suggested that both IWFC and IBFC could be used as a cement replacement at least at a ratio of 10% by weight of cement. Although physical properties of the OPC+IWFC and the OPC+IBFC were impaired due to IFC replacement, the addition of strain WH and its biogenic CaCO3 could compensate the reduction of those properties and, in the case of the OPC+IBFC+WH, even enhance the quality of the materials to better than those of the conventional cement (OPC). Further research on the maximum ratio of IFC which can be used as a cement replacement is planned for the future. Moreover, the pozzolanic effects of IBFC when calcifying bacteria was incorporated into the cement composite is also worth investigating.

Conclusions

This work investigated the effects of a calcifying bacterium Lysinibacillus sp. WH in enhancing mechanical properties of cementitious composites containing IWFC and IBFC. Key findings in our work are outlined as follows:

  1. 1.

    This work is the first to use IBFC, which mainly consisted of SiO2 (58.80%), as a cement replacement. The physicochemical properties of IBFC suggested it a Class N pozzolan according to ASTM C618 standard.

  2. 2.

    The use of both IWFC and IBFC as a cement replacement (10% w/w cement) caused a reduction in compressive strength, an increase in water absorption and void when compared to OPC.

  3. 3.

    The addition of strain WH could compensate for the loss of strength, while reducing water absorption and void of the cementitious composites, especially in the case of OPC+IBFC+WH. Note that this is the first work to use calcifying bacteria to improve mechanical properties of cementitious composites containing natural substances derived from agro-industrial wastes.

  4. 4.

    An increase in strength of the OPC+IBFC+WH was likely to be due to biogenic calcite rather than C3S, whereas C3S formation was induced in the presence of strain WH in the OPC+IWFC+WH.

Therefore, the finding implied that MICP technology from strain WH was effective in improving the physical properties of biocement containing agro-industrial waste. As a result, the use of incinerated sugarcane filter cake, both white and black types, from the sugar industry as a cement replacement is applicable. It provides an alternative method for reducing industrial waste and producing environmentally friendly materials while solving the challenges of future waste pollution.

Data availability

The data used in this work can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Krishnapriya, S. & Venkatesh Babu, D. L. Isolation and identification of bacteria to improve the strength of concrete. Microbiol. Res. 174, 48–55 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Achal, V. & Mukherjee, A. A review of microbial precipitation for sustainable construction. Constr. Build. Mater. 93, 1224–1235 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ariyanti, D. & Handayani, N. A. An overview of biocement production from microalgae. Int. J. Sci. Eng. 2, 31–33 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miller, S. A., Horvath, A. & Monteiro, P. J. M. Impacts of booming concrete production on water resources worldwide. Nat. Sustain. 1, 69–76 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hosseini, M., Shao, Y. & Whalen, J. K. Biocement production from silicon-rich plant residues: Perspectives and future potential in Canada. Biosyst. Eng. 110, 351–362 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bheel, N. Rice husk ash and fly ash effects on the mechanical properties of concrete. (2020).

  7. Bheel, N. et al. Mechanical performance of concrete incorporating wheat straw ash as partial replacement of cement. J. Build. Pathol. Rehab. 7, 1–7 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aliyu, S., Mohammed, A., Matawal, D. S. & Duna, S. Response surfaces for compressive strength of high performance concrete with corn cob ash. 2, 1–22 (2019).

  9. da Gloria, M. Y. R. & Toledo Filho, R. D. Innovative sandwich panels made of wood bio-concrete and sisal fiber reinforced cement composites. Constr. Build. Materials. 272, (2021).

  10. Jahanzaib, M., Aslam, M. & Ahmad, S. Utilization of sugarcane bagasse ash as cement replacement for the production of sustainable concrete – A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 270, 121371 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sua-Iam, G. & Makul, N. Effect of incinerated sugarcane filter cake on the properties of self-compacting concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 130, 32–40 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khumla, N. et al. Sugarcane breeding, germplasm development and supporting genetics research in Thailand. Sugar Tech. (2021).

  13. Workman, D. Sugar Exports by Country https://www.worldstopexports.com/sugar-exports-country/ (2020)

  14. Chauhan, M. K., Varun, C. & Kumar, S. Life cycle assessment of sugar industry: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 3445–3453 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta, N., Tripathi, S. & Balomajumder, C. Characterization of pressmud: A sugar industry waste. Fuel 90, 389–394 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, H., Xu, W., Yang, X. & Wu, J. Preparation of Portland cement with sugar filter mud as lime-based raw material. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 107–112 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Makul, N. & Sua-Iam, G. Characteristics and utilization of sugarcane filter cake waste in the production of lightweight foamed concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 126, 118–133 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akindahunsi, A. A., Adeyemo, S. M. & Adeoye, A. The use of bacteria (Bacillus subtilis) in improving the mechanical properties of concrete. J. Build. Pathol. Rehab. 6, (2021).

  19. Ekprasert, J., Fongkaew, I., Chainakun, P., Kamngam, R. & Boonsuan, W. Investigating mechanical properties and biocement application of CaCO3 precipitated by a newly-isolated Lysinibacillus sp. WH using artificial neural networks. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–13 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Joshi, S., Goyal, S., Mukherjee, A. & Reddy, M. S. Microbial healing of cracks in concrete: A review. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 44, 1511–1525 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwantes-Cezario, N. et al. Effects of Bacillus subtilis biocementation on the mechanical properties of mortars. Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Mater. 12, 31–38 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jonkers, H. M. & Schlangen, E. Crack repair by concrete-immobilized bacteria. In: Proceedings of The Firs International Conference on Self Healing Materials. Noordwijk aan Zee, The Netherlands. (2007).

  23. van Tittelboom, K., de Belie, N., de Muynck, W. & Verstraete, W. Use of bacteria to repair cracks in concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 40, 157–166 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ekprasert, J. et al. Kinetic model of a newly‐isolated Lysinibacillus sp. strain YL and elastic properties of its biogenic CaCO 3 towards biocement application. Biotechnol. J.. (2021).

  25. Farrugia, C., Borg, R. P., Ferrara, L. & Buhagiar, J. The application of lysinibacillus sphaericus for surface treatment and crack healing in mortar. 5, 1–10 (2019).

  26. Lee, Y. S., Kim, H. J. & Park, W. Non-ureolytic calcium carbonate precipitation by Lysinibacillus sp. YS11 isolated from the rhizosphere of Miscanthus sacchariflorus. J. Microbiol. 55, 440–447 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mutitu, D. K. et al. Influence of Lysinibacillus sphaericus on compressive strength and water sorptivity in microbial cement mortar. Heliyon. 5, e02881 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vashisht, R., Attri, S., Sharma, D., Shukla, A. & Goel, G. Monitoring biocalcification potential of Lysinibacillus sp. isolated from alluvial soils for improved compressive strength of concrete. Microbiol. Res. 207, 226–231 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Castro-Alonso, M. J. et al. Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) and its potential in bioconcrete: Microbiological and molecular concepts. Front. Mater. 6, 1–15 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Boquet, E., Boronat, A. & Ramos-Cormenzana, A. Production of calcite (Calcium Carbonate) crystals by soil bacteria is a general phenomenon. Nature 246, 527–529 (1973).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ASTM C642–13. Standard test method for density, absorption and voids in hardened concrete, ASTM International. (2013).

  32. ASTM C109. Standard test method of compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50 mm] cube specimens), Annual Book of ASTM Standard 04.01. (2002).

  33. da Silva, V. L. et al. Application of SDS surfactant microemulsion for removal of filter cake of oil-based drilling fluid: Influence of cosurfactant. J. Petrol. Explor. Prod. Technol. 10, 2845–2856 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pavlík, Z. et al. DSC and TG analysis of a blended binder based on waste ceramic powder and portland cement. Int. J. Thermophys. 37, 1–14 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chindaprasirt, P. et al. Effect of calcium-rich compounds on setting time and strength development of alkali-activated fly ash cured at ambient temperature. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 9, (2018).

  36. Mawardi, M. et al. The fabrication of portland composite cement based on pozzolan napa soil. Materials. 14, (2021).

  37. Yadav, R. L. & Solomon, S. Potential of developing sugarcane by-product based industries in India. Sugar Tech. 8, 104–111 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. ASTM C618–15. Standard specification of coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standard 04.02. (2015).

  39. Cui, L. & Fall, M. Mechanical and thermal properties of cemented tailings materials at early ages: Influence of initial temperature, curing stress and drainage conditions. Constr. Build. Mater. 125, 553–563 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Libos, I. L. S. & Cui, L. Effects of curing time, cement content, and saturation state on mode-I fracture toughness of cemented paste backfill. Eng. Fract. Mech. 235, (2020).

  41. Fan, W. J., Wang, X. Y. & Park, K. B. Evaluation of the chemical and mechanical properties of hardening high-calcium fly ash blended concrete. Materials. 8, 5933–5952 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Papadakis, V. G. Effect of fly ash on Portland cement systems Part II. High-calcium fly ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 30(10), 1647–1654 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kadri, E. H., Aggoun, S., de Schutter, G. & Ezziane, K. Combined effect of chemical nature and fineness of mineral powders on Portland cement hydration. Mater. Struct./Materiaux et Constr. 43, 665–673 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Courard, L., Michel, F., Perkowicz, S. & Garbacz, A. Effects of limestone fillers on surface free energy and electrical conductivity of the interstitial solution of cement mixes. Cem. Concr. Compos. 45, 111–116 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Aqel, M. & Panesar, D. K. Hydration kinetics and compressive strength of steam-cured cement pastes and mortars containing limestone filler. Constr. Build. Mater. 113, 359–368 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Matschei, T., Lothenbach, B. & Glasser, F. P. The role of calcium carbonate in cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 37, 551–558 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lothenbach, B., le Saout, G., Gallucci, E. & Scrivener, K. Influence of limestone on the hydration of Portland cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 38, 848–860 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hargis, C. W., Telesca, A. & Monteiro, P. J. M. Calcium sulfoaluminate (Ye’elimite) hydration in the presence of gypsum, calcite, and vaterite. Cem. Concr. Res. 65, 15–20 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, D., Xiong, C., Li, W. & Chang, J. Growth of calcium carbonate induced by accelerated carbonation of tricalcium silicate. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 14718–14731 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Qi, L., Liu, J. & Liu, Q. Compound effect of CaCO3 and CaSO4·2H2O on the strength of steel slag - cement binding materials. Mater. Res. 19, 269–275 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tsimas, S. & Moutsatsou-Tsima, A. High-calcium fly ash as the fourth constituent in concrete: Problems, solutions and perspectives. Cement Concr. Compos. 27, 231–237 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu, J., Li, Q. & Xu, S. Influence of nanoparticles on fluidity and mechanical properties of cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 101, 892–901 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Z.M.D. was financially supported by the KKU scholarship for ASEAN and GMS countries’ Personnel of Academic Year 2020. P.C. and J.E. thanks for the financial support from Suranaree University of Technology (SUT), Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), and National Science Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF), under project no. 160355. We would like to thank the Sustainable Infrastructure Research and Development Center (SIRDC), Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University for engineering equipment support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.M.D.: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing-original draft. N.T.: Formal analysis, Data curation. W.S. (SUT): Supervision, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. I.F.: Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. P.C.: Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. W.S. (KKU): Formal analysis, Resources. S.B.: Resources, Writing-review and editing. V.S.: Resources, Writing-review and editing. J.E.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing, Visualization, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jindarat Ekprasert.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ditta, Z.M., Tanapongpisit, N., Saenrang, W. et al. Bio-strengthening of cementitious composites from incinerated sugarcane filter cake by a calcifying bacterium Lysinibacillus sp. WH. Sci Rep 12, 7026 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11330-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11330-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing