Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# New therizinosaurid dinosaur from the marine Osoushinai Formation (Upper Cretaceous, Japan) provides insight for function and evolution of therizinosaur claws

## Abstract

The record of therizinosaurs is rich in Asian countries such as Mongolia and China. Fragmentary therizinosaur specimens have been reported from the Lower and Upper Cretaceous deposits in Japan. One of these specimens, from the lower Campanian Osoushinai Formation in Nakagawa Town of Hokkaido Prefecture, was previously identified as a maniraptoran theropod dinosaur, possibly therizinosaur, but its taxonomic status remained unresolved. This study re-examines the specimen and provides a more detailed description and attempts to resolve its taxonomic status. Our study demonstrates that it is a new taxon, Paralitherizinosaurus japonicus gen. et sp. nov., because it shows a unique combination of characters in the metacarpal I and unguals. Our phylogenetic analysis places this new taxon within an unresolved clade of Therizinosauridae in the strict consensus tree. The 50% majority-rule consensus tree shows better resolution within Therizinosauridae, showing an unresolved monophyletic clade of Paralitherizinosaurus, Therizinosaurus, Suzhousaurus, and the Bissekty form. Geometric morphometric analysis suggests that Paralitherizinosaurus unguals most closely resemble Therizinosaurus unguals in being slender and has weak flexor tubercles. This study also shows an evolutionary trend in ungual shape, which associates a decrease in mechanical advantage, development of flexor tubercle, and hypothesized output (product of mechanical advantage and development of flexor tubercle) in derived therizinosaurs, supporting the hook-and-pull function of claws to bring vegetation to its mouth. Paralitherizinosaurus is the youngest therizinosaur from Japan and the first recovered from the marine deposits in Asia. This suggests a long temporal existence of therizinosaurs at the eastern edge of the Asian continent and adaptation of therizinosaurs to coastal environments.

## Introduction

In 2008, Murakami et al.1 described a partial manus of a theropod dinosaur, consisting of metacarpal I and manual unguals I-2, II-3, and III-4 from the right side in a concretion, from the upper Campanian Osoushinai Formation of the Yezo Group in Nakagawa Town of Hokkaido Island of Japan (Fig. 1a–c). The Yezo Group is composed of mainly Upper Cretaceous marine sediments and rich in invertebrate and vertebrate fossils, including sharks, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, turtles, pterosaurs, non-avian dinosaurs, and birds. So far, dinosaur materials of hadrosaurids, tyrannosauroid, and nodosaurid, in addition to the Nakagawa theropod, have been reported from the group2,3,4. The Nakagawa specimen was identified as a maniraptoran dinosaur and Murakami et al.1 argued further that it may belong to a derived therizinosaur because of the lack of a groove between the flexor tubercle and the proximal articular surface of the unguals. It was extremely difficult to resolve the identification of Nakagawa specimen to the family level or lower at the time of publication because of the limited comparative information in the literature. However, more recent studies have provided a great deal of information on therizinosaur unguals, permitting comparisons of manual morphologies among therizinosaurs and for testing the phylogenetic status of the Nakagawa specimen5,6,7,8,9,10.

Asian therizinosaurs radiated in the Early Cretaceous, and their diversification continued into the Late Cretaceous. The Late Cretaceous taxa are larger than the Early Cretaceous forms in body size, exemplified by Therizinosaurus cheloniformis from Mongolia with elongate, large and nearly straight manual unguals. Manual unguals of therizinosaurs have a large diversity in shapes and functions. Based on the shape analysis with extinct and extant mammals by Lautenschlager10, basal therizinosaurs, such as Alxasaurus and Erliansaurus, have short and compact unguals for a proposed generalist functionality because these are placed near the boundaries of the morphospace of scansorial, fossorial, and terrestrial mammals, whereas other therizinosaurs with elongate unguals occupy outside of these mammals for potentially different functions. Only Nothronychus has unguals like those found in fossorial mammals. Because some therizinosaurs such as Beipiaosaurus and Therizinosaurus, have similar unguals to those of ornithomimosaurs, elongate unguals are presumed to have a similar function, possibly to pull the base of branches to bring leaves to their heads10.

Therizinosaurs have been found mainly from the Cretaceous deposits in Mongolia and China. All of the Early Cretaceous taxa, except Falcarius, have been named from China so far, and two taxa are recovered from northern (Alxasaurus from the Inner Mongolia)11 and northwestern (Suzhousaurus from Gansu Province) regions12. Other Chinese taxa (Jianchangosaurus, Beipiaosaurus, and Lingyuanosaurus)6,13,14 were recovered from the Jehol Group in the Liaoning Province of China, located in the eastern part of the country. The Late Cretaceous therizinosaurs have been discovered from the Gobi Desert (Inner Mongolia of China and southern Mongolia) except for Nanshiungosaurus (Guangdong Province in the southeastern China along the Pacific). Although it has not been named yet, therizinosaur materials have been recovered from the Bissekty Formation in Uzbekistan, which may represent more than two taxa9. However, we follow Sues and Averianov9 in their treatment of the Bissekty therizinosauroid material as a single taxon. Japan, which was located at the eastern edge of the Asian continent during the Cretaceous before the opening of the Japan Sea during the Miocene, has produced two therizinosaur specimens from the Lower and Upper Cretaceous deposits15,16 (Fig. 1a) but neither is named because of the fragmentary nature of the specimens. The Nakagawa specimen is the third therizinosaur from Japan. It is important because it is the youngest occurrence of therizinosaurs from Japan and preserves important elements that enlighten our understanding of its finer-scale taxonomic identification as well as providing insights into and morphological function.

This study will describe the Nakagawa material in detail, compare with other therizinosaurs, demonstrate its phylogenetic placement within Maniraptora/Therizinosauria, quantify the ungual shapes through geometric morphometric analysis to elucidate the evolution and function of therizinosaur claws, and discuss its paleogeographic and paleoecological implications.

### Geological setting

Detailed information is provided by Murakami et al.1 and summarized here. This specimen was contained in an isolated concretion as float, sitting near the confluence of the Rubeshibe River and 36 Ten-zawa Creek in Nakagawa Town in Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan (Fig. 1a). The concretion was discovered in an area where the Nishichirashinai Formation (Coniacian to lower Santonian) is exposed. Murakami et al.1 concluded that it was originally from an upstream area, where the Oshoushinai Formation (early Campanian) crops out because of the presence of the inoceramid bivalve Sphenoceramus in the concretion and the features of lithofaces (heavily bioturbated matrix and fine grain size), which matches the Osoushinai Formation. The depositional environment of this formation is considered as deeper than outer shelf because of the lack of storm deposits. The concretion is roughly 25 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm (Fig. 1b). It is plausible to consider that all materials belong to a single individual based on its depositional environment and close proximity of all preserved elements as mentioned by Murakami et al.1.

### Systematic paleontology

Theropoda Marsh17.

Coelurosauria von Huene18.

Therizinosauria Russell19.

Therizinosauridae Maleev20.

Paralitherizinosaurus japonicus gen. et sp. nov.

Zoobank ID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8397F6AE-4791-4EE6-B6CF-B25950FB617C (for this publication), urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7934F3DA-B1CA-4CAA-B5E4-86D41B93E7CE (for the new genus) and urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:BC19DCA2-8F4A-4FDC-83C4-B9EB8D3C30EF (for the new species).

Etymology “Paralos” means by or near the sea in Greek, “therizo” means reap in Greek, and “sauros” means reptile in Latin. Specific name, “japon” refers to Japan.

Holotype NMV-52 (NMV, Nakagawa Museum of Natural History, Japan), a partial vertebra and a partial right hand, including metacarpal I, proximal ends of unguals I and II, and nearly complete ungual III (Fig. 1c).

Horizon and locality The Osoushinai Formation (early Campanian) of the Yezo Group in Nakagawa Town in Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan.

Diagnosis A therizinosaurid with the following unique characters: dorsoventrally flattened metacarpal I (dorsoventral height less than half of transverse width) with no rotation of the axis of the distal end; presence of proximodorsally projecting dorsal lip in digits I and III; a shallow depression at the proximal portion of ungual III-4, connecting to the collateral groove; the presence of proximally extending ventral process; a weak flexor tubercle expressed as a small ridge.

Description and comparisons The original study described four manual elements from the right side (metacarpal I and manual unguals I-2, II-3, and III-4), but this study identified another bone as a partial cervical centrum (Fig. 2) although the fragmentary nature of this bone limits the certainty of its identification. We interpret the specimen as the anteroventral portion of a cervical centrum. Therizinosaur presacral vertebrae are highly pneumatic8,14,21, a condition that is present in this specimen. The parapophysis is ventrally placed on the lateral surface. Two laminae, posterodorsal and ventral laminae, extend posterior to the parapophysis. The arrangement of the posterodorsal lamina is similar to the centrodiapophyseal lamina in Northonychus8. Ventral surface is flat and featureless.

Metacarpal I is nearly complete. It is 57.87 mm long, which is approximately twice the length of the transverse width (29.41 mm) at the proximal end. In anterior view, the distal half of metacarpal I diverges medially by 17 degrees from the contact surface with metacarpal II (Fig. 3a,a′,c,c′). A similar condition is present in two Chinese therizinosaurids (Alxasaurus and Erliansaurus), while the shaft of metacarpal I is nearly straight in basal therizinosauroids (Falcarius and Jianchangosaurus) and the therizinosaurid Therizinosaurus5,14,22. The shaft width (21.72 mm) is roughly two-thirds of the proximal width. The medial border of this element is strongly concave in anterior view (Fig. 3a,a′), whereas it is nearly straight in Nothronychus and Therizinosaurus and weakly concave in Falcarius, Alxasaurus, and Erliansaurus5,8,11,22,23. The width of the proximal end is greater than the dorsoventral height (24.47 mm). In proximal view, the proximal end is triangular with three processes: medial, anterolateral, and posterolateral processes. In their preliminary description of this specimen, Murakami et al.1 noted that the presence of a rectangular buttress was not clear because of its preservation. Our examination shows that the base of the ventrolateral process is preserved, and a ridge extends ventrally from the process, indicating the presence of a rectangular buttress (Fig. 3b,b′,c,c′). The buttress would underlie the ventral surface of the metacarpal II if entirely preserved, and this is a synapomorphic feature for the clade of Therizinosauroidea11. In anterior view, the proximal edge of the proximal end between the dorsal and mediolateral processes is straight as in therizinosaurids (e.g., Alxasaurus and Therizinosaurus). Falcarius has a concave proximal edge of the proximal end for a dorsomedial notch22. The proximal surface has a depression with a size of 21 mm × 14 mm (Fig. 3e,e′). The medial edge of the element bears a medial ridge (Fig. 3d,d′), connecting the medial process of the proximal end and medial condyle of the distal end. This feature is present only in Therizinosaurus and diagnostic for this taxon5. The cross-section of the shaft is triangular as in Therizinosaurus, whereas it is oval in Falcarius22. It is anteroposteriorly compressed, and its dorsoventral height is 10.12 mm, less than half of lateromedial width of the shaft. A rotation of the axis of distal end from the long axis of the element is noted in Falcarius22 and Erliansaurus, but this rotation is absent in Paralitherizinosaurus. The distal end has lateral and medial condyles, separated by a shallow sulcus (Fig. 3f,f′). The lateral condyle has a circular collateral ligament fossa, whereas the medial condyle lacks a fossa and has a flat medial surface. A collateral ligament fossa is absent in Falcarius22 and Therizinosaurus. The medial condyle is proximally positioned with respect to the lateral condyle in therizinosaurs, but this condition is more subtle in Paralitherizinosaurus.

Manual ungual I-2 preserves only lateral side of the proximal end (Fig. 4a,b,a′,b′). It has a dorsal lip, which is a proximodorsally projecting process above the phalangeal articular surface of manual unguals. This process is commonly seen in manual unguals of therizinosaurs, oviraptorosaurs, and dromaeosaurids24. In derived therizinosaurs, Therizinosauridae, no taxa have a dorsal lip in manual ungual I-2. The only therizinosaur with a dorsal lip is the basal therizinosaur Beipiaosaurus13. In lateral view, the outline of the surface is like the other manual unguals of Paralitherizinosaurus (Fig. 4a,a′).

Manual ungual II-3 preserves the proximal portion of the element and exhibits a pronounced dorsal lip as seen in Falcarius, Lingyuanosaurus, Alxasaurus, and Therizinosaurus (Figs. 4d–f,d′–f′ and Fig. 5)6,11,22,25. The ventral surface of this lip forms a dorsal portion of the phalangeal articular surface. The medial side of the base of the lip has a shallow depression, extending ventrally (Fig. 4e,e′). The ventral half of the medial surface has a wide depression. A depression on lateral and medial surfaces of proximal portions in Jianchangosaurus, Lingyuanosaurus, and Therizinosaurus is continuous from the collateral groove6,14,25. Ventral to the phalangeal articular surface bears a ventral process, which extends slightly more proximally than the articular surface, similar to the condition observed in Erliansaurus (Fig. 4e,e′,g,g′). It is square in lateral view as in Therizinosaurus. The phalangeal articular surface is divided asymmetrically by a vertical ridge, and the medial side is larger than the lateral side (Fig. 4c,c′).

Manual ungual III-4 is transversely narrow as in other unguals (Fig. 4k,k′,l,l′) and strongly curved as in other therizinosaurs, other than Therizinosaurus5,25 (Fig. 4i,i′,j,j′). The collateral groove on the lateral surface of this element approaches the dorsal margin of the ungual distally. Although the distal end is missing, the collateral groove may be extended to the dorsal edge of the distalmost part of the ungual in Paralitherizinosaurus (Fig. 4i,i′), which is a potential diagnostic feature for Therizinosauroidea6. The groove at the proximal end is close to the ventral edge of the ungual, like the ungual of digit II of Therizinosaurus and isolated unguals from the Bissekty taxon (Fig. 5), and is continuous with a shallow depression. This depression is much smaller than the ones observed in Jianchangosaurus, Lingyuanosaurus, Nothronychus, and Therizinosaurus6,8,14, which have a large triangular depression. Extension of the collateral groove to the proximal end is only seen in isolated unguals of the Bissetky taxon (Fig. 5). The medial surface of the ungual is flat and featureless (Fig. 4j,j′). Distally, the collateral groove is faintly present and migrates dorsally towards its tip. In most therizinosaurs, both the lateral and the medial surfaces have distinct collateral grooves. The asymmetry of features on the lateral and the medial surfaces is present to some extent, but this strong asymmetry may be a unique feature for Paralitherizinosaurus. The ungual has a dorsal lip at the proximal end (Fig. 4i,i′,j,j′). In Therizinosauria, a complete set of manual unguals is rarely preserved but has been reported in five taxa (Falcarius, Beipiaosaurus, Martharaptor, Erliansaurus, and Nothronychus). Among these taxa, only two taxa have a dorsal lip, which is present in digits II and III in Falcarius and in digits I in Beipiaosaurus. Three therizinosaurids (Lingyuanosaurus, Alxasaurus, and Nothronychus) preserve the manual ungual of digit III, but none of these taxa preserves a dorsal lip because of damage, suggesting the presence of a dorsal lip in manual ungual III-4 may be unique to Paralitherizinosaurus. At the base of the dorsal lip is a shallow depression as in the ungual of digit II. The phalangeal articular surface is divided by a vertical ridge, but it is nearly symmetrical (Fig. 4h,h′). Ventral to the articular surface has a ventral process, which extends more proximally than the articular surface. This large ventral process is present in the ungual of the digit III of Erliansaurus. The ventral surface of the ventral process bears a weak ridge, which is a flexor tubercle. The original description of this ungual interpreted that the flexor tubercle was missing because of bioerosion1. Subsequent preparation of this ungual shows that this portion was not damaged and there is an extremely weak flexor tubercle on the ventral surface (Fig. 4l,l′). A similar condition is present in Therizinosaurus (Fig. 5), where the other therizinosaurs have a strong flexor tubercle.

## Discussion

A phylogenetic analysis in this study recovered 970 most parsimonious trees with 1294 steps. The consistency index is 0.349, and the retention index is 0.702 for these trees. The strict consensus tree places Paralitherizinosaurus within the unresolved clade, consisting of derived therizinosaurs such as Therizinosaurus, Nothronychus, Nanshiungosaurus, Suzhousaurus, Erlikosaurus, and Segnosaurus (Fig. 6a). This clade is supported by four synapomorphies (cranially focused pubic boot with little to no caudal process [character 178], ischiadic peduncle of ilium and antitrochanter forming hypertrophied and spherical boss [character 312], mediolaterally flattened pubic shaft [character 317], greatly enlarged distal pubic shaft [character 318]). According to taxonomic definitions by Zanno5, this clade is named as Therizinosauridae; however, members of this clade are not stable because of poor resolution for derived therizinosaurs. For instance, Bissekty taxon6,9, Erliansaurus14, Nanshiungosaurus7,14, Neimongosaurus14, and Suzhousaurus7 are excluded from the clade of Therizinosauridae based on the definition by Zanno5. A new definition of Therizinosauridae is proposed here for the stability of this clade: the most inclusive clade containing Therizinosaurus cheloniformis but not Alxasaurus elesitaiensis. This clade is well supported by nine synapomorphies (extensive axial pneumaticity extending through more than half of dorsal vertebrae [character 106], six sacral vertebrae [character 110], rostrally edentulous dentary [character 220], significantly expanded distal humerus [character 293], ginglymoid distal end of metacarpal III in dorsal view [character 296], weakly developed or absent ligament pits on manual phalanges [character 302], strongly curved pedal unguals III and IV [character 337], expanded medial aspect of distal humerus and subtriangular in cranial view with entepicondyle located well medial to ulnar condyle [character 343], ventral process ventral to the articular surface of manual unguals [character 355]). Based on this definition, all members of non-therizinosaurid therizinosaurs are recovered from the Early Cretaceous whereas all therizinosaurids except for Suzhousaurus are found from the Late Cretaceous.

The monophyly of Erliansaurus and Neimongosaurus is posited as the most basal clade of Therizinosauridae, and Enigmosaurus is a sister taxon to the unresolved clade of derived therizinosaurids. The 50% majority-rule consensus tree shows better resolution within derived therizinosaurids (Fig. 6b). Therizinosaurus, Suzhousaurus, Bissekty taxon, and Paralitherizinosaurus form a monophyletic clade, supported by three synapomorphies (dorsal flange at dorsal margin of scapular blade [character 284], weak flexor tubercles of manual unguals [character 353], and lateral and medial grooves of manual unguals extending to proximal end [character 356]), but their relationships are unresolved. The clade of Nanshiungosaurus and higher taxa is supported by a single character (ischiadic peduncle of ilium and antitrochanter forming hypertrophied and spherical boss [character 312]), and that of Nothronychus, Erlikosaurus, and Segnosaurus share a single character (fused sacral neural spines into continuous spinal ridge [character 278]). It is noteworthy that two therizinosaurids (Erlikosaurus and Segnosaurus) from the same formation form a clade by sharing another character (trochanter or crest on caudomedial surface of humeral shaft [character 287]). Paralitherizinosaurus shows an affinity with Falcarius in having a dorsal lip in unguals of digits II and III; with Lingyuanosaurus in having a dorsal lip in ungual of digit II and a shallow depression on the lateral surface; with Erliansaurus in having a ventral process at the proximal end; with Nothronychus in having a shallow depression on the lateral surface; with Alxasaurus in having a dorsal lip in ungual of digit II and ventrally positioned collateral groove; with Therizinosaurus in having a dorsal lip in ungual of digit II, a shallow depression on the lateral surface, a ventral process at the proximal end, extremely weak flexor tubercle, and ventrally positioned collateral groove.

In this study, geometric morphometrics analysis of therizinosaur manual unguals demonstrates that the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) explain > 65% of the total shape variation (Supplementary Table S1). In PC1, high values indicate a ventrodistal shift of the proximodorsal border, a dorsodistal shift of ventrodistal border, and a proximal shift of proximoventral border from the mean shape, resulting in the ungual elongation. Therizinosaurus has the highest PC1 value (0.20), followed by Paralitherizinosaurus (0.17) (Fig. 7a). Most of the therizinosaurs fall within the range of -0.10 and 0.10, whereas Paralitherizinosaurus and Therizinosaurus are far outside of the range. In PC2, high values suggest a dorsodistal shift of proximodorsal border, a ventrodistal shift of proximoventral border, and a distal shift of the phalangeal articular surface, resulting in a robust ungual with a larger articular surface and a pronounced flexor tubercle. Paralitherizinosaurus has a higher PC2 value (0.07) than Therizinosaurus (− 0.06). The mechanical advantage (MA) of unguals shows little correlation with PC1 (p > 0.05) but a statistically significant correlation with PC2 (Fig. 7b). A residual of Paralitherizinosaurus from the regression line is negatively the largest among therizinosaurs. Paralitherizinosaurus has a similar PC2 value to the unguals of digit II of Martharaptor (0.07) and Alxasaurus (0.06), but MA of Paralitherizinosaurus (0.28) is as low as Erliansaurus (0.25–0.28). Boxplots of MAs of therizinosaurs show that derived therizinosaurs (therizinosaurids) tend to have smaller values of MA than primitive therizinosaurs (non-therizinosaurid therizinosaurs) although the difference is statistically insignificant (Welch’s test, p = 0.17). Paralitherizinosaurus is plotted near the median value of MA for derived therizinosaurs (Fig. 7c). Derived therizinosaurs tend to have smaller flexor tubercles than primitive therizinosaurs (Fig. 7d). Paralitherizinosaurus has the least development of flexor tubercle (DFT) (0.11), followed by Erliansaurus (0.12) and Therizinosaurus (0.13), among therizinosaurs. If DFT is a proxy of the degree of force input, hypothesized outputs (product of MA and DFT) of derived therizinosaurs are less than those of primitive therizinosaurs (Fig. 7e). Paralitherizinosaurus has the second smallest value of hypothesized output (0.029), whereas Therizinosaurus has the smallest (0.026). In addition, the posteroventrally expanded ventral process of Paralitherizinosaurus and Therizinosaurus contacts the preceding phalanx in flexion by a lower degree of the range of motion, thus expected to limit the ungual mobility. This small hypothesized output value and the limited range of motion may together indicate that the unguals in these taxa were less functional compared to the basal taxa. These results also show a possible evolutionary trend in decreases of MA, DFT, and hypothesized outputs among therizinosauroids. The combination of this study and the previous study by Lautenschlager10 suggest that primitive therizinosaurs have unguals with generalist functionalities and that the unguals of derived therizinosaurs did not function with a strong force such as scansorial, fossorial, or terrestrial behaviors but was stiffer as a rake for hook-and-pull function to bring vegetation to the head24.

Paralitherizinosaurus is the third therizinosaur specimen from Japan4, following a single tooth from the Lower Formation of the Sasayama Group (early Albian?)15 and a partial braincase, teeth, and humerus from the Upper Formation of the Mifune Group (Cenomanian-Coniacian?) in Kyushu Island16. Although neither specimen has been described yet, it has been suggested that the Sasayama therizinosaur was similar to the Early Cretaceous Falcarius (Barremian) from Utah based on the size of denticles15 and the Mifune specimen showed affinities with Erlikosaurus from the Bayanshiree Formation (Cenomanian–Turonian) of Mongolia in tooth and humerus morphologies16. Paralitherizinosaurus is from the early Campanian Osoushinai Formation1, showing that it is the youngest occurrence of therizinosaur remains in Japan and a wide temporal distribution of therizinosaurs from the Early to Late Cretaceous at the eastern edge of the Asian continent5. The latest Cretaceous (Campanian to Maastrichtian) therizinosaurs in Asia are represented by Erliansaurus, Neimongosaurus, and Nanshiungosaurus from China and Therizinosaurus from Mongolia as well as Paralitherizinosaurus, indicating a wide longitudinal and latitudinal geographic distribution (more than 1000 km in both directions) of therizinosaurs in Asia5. It is noteworthy that Paralitherizinosaurus is the first therizinosaur record from marine sediments in Asia and the second taxon in the world. The first record from marine sediments was Nothronychus graffami from the Tropic Shale27. These occurrences from marine sediments suggest that some therizinosaurids, hadrosaurids, and nodosaurids were adapted to coastal environment (Fig. 1d) in both Asian and North American continents2,28,29.

## Materials and methods

### Phylogeny

A phylogenetic analysis was performed using TNT (Tree Analysis Using New Technology) v. 1.530 and the data matrix of Yao et al.6 with the addition of the new therizinosaur described here. In addition, character 151 in Yao et al.6 is modified into three characters (151, 353, and 354) (Supplementary Text S2). The resultant matrix comprises 79 OTUs of 356 characters (Supplementary Data S3). Most parsimonious trees were obtained by heuristic search methods on 1000 replicates of Wagner trees with random addition sequences and subject to tree bisection-reconnection swapping methods holding 10 trees per replicate. As noted by Yao et al.6, twenty-one characters (characters 27, 37, 40, 68, 76, 78, 97, 106, 113, 157, 163, 168, 253, 303, 304, 308, 309, 310, 334, 342, and 345) were designated additive and two characters (characters 165 and 215) are excluded.

### Definition of taxonomic names

This study follows Zanno5 for the definition of Therizinosauria, which is the most inclusive clade containing Therizinosaurus cheloniformis but not Tyrannosaurus rex, Ornithomimus edmontonicus, Mononykus olecranus, Oviraptor philoceratops or Troodon formosus. Zanno et al.27 defined Therizinosauridae as the least inclusive clade containing Nothronychus, Segnosaurus galbinensis, Erlikosaurus andrewsi, and Therizinosaurus cheloniformis, but this study redefined this group as the most inclusive clade containing Therizinosaurus cheloniformis but not Alxasaurus elesitaiensis as discussed in the main text.

### Geometric morphometric analysis

To quantify two-dimensional ungual shape variations, geometric morphometric analysis was performed using R package geomorph version 3.3.1.31. Ungual images other than of Paralitherizinosaurus and Therizinosaurus were obtained from the literature6,7,8,9,11,14,22,23. Outlines of the unguals in the lateral view were digitalized into four fixed landmarks and 12 sliding semi-landmarks (Supplementary Datas S46), following Chinzorig et al.32. The landmarks were subjected to the generalized Procrustes analysis33,34 to superimpose the specimens. This analysis first scales all shapes (ungual landmarks in this case) into the same size, then rotates the shape coordinates around the origin until the differences among the shapes are minimized. Using the covariance matrix of the Procrustes coordinates, the principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. PCA finds the maximum variance in multidimentional (multi-variable) dataset that summarizes the original data as PC1, the following variance as PC2, and so on. As the result, PCA allows graphical illustration of multivariate data into two-dimensional graph as shown in Fig. 735,36. To infer the functionality of therizinosaur unguals, the mechanical advantage (MA) was calculated. Since MA is equivalent to a class 3 lever37, resultant MA values represent the proportion of the output force applied on the tip of the ungual relative to the input force at the flexor tubercle. The mechanical advantage of the ungual can be calculated as:

$${\text{MA }} = \, \sin \left( {\theta \, + \, \delta } \right){\text{ d}}/{\text{a}}$$
(1)

In the Eq. (1), a is the output lever length from the point of the fulcrum to the resistance, d is the length from the point of the fulcrum to the flexor tubercle, θ is the angle of the input force vector to the line of output lever, and δ is the angle between the line from the point of the fulcrum to the flexor tubercle and the line of output lever32 The flexor tubercle size is considered to be closely related to the cross-sectional area of the attached muscle, which should correspond to the maximum input force. Therefore, flexor tubercle size was quantified as a ratio of the perpendicular length from the apex of the flexor tubercle to the segment between the base of the flexor tubercle as a proxy of the input force. The flexor tubercle size was then multiplied by the mechanical advantage to infer the output force at the tip. The inferred output forces were compared among digits (I, II, and III) and taxonomically (non-therizinosaurid therizinosaurs and therizinosaurids). Standardized major axis (SMA) regression analyses were conducted using R package smatr version 3.4.8 to test the relationship between the obtained PC scores and the inferred output and the inferred output force to test the shape-function relationships of the therizinosaur unguals. All of the statistical analyses were conducted on software R version 4.0.238. The analyses are conducted using the R script provided as Supplementary Data S6.

## Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are available as supplementary information files at figshare (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11063-5).

## References

1. Murakami, M., Hirayama, R., Hikida, Y. & Hirano, H. A theropod dinosaur (Saurischia: Maniraptora) from the Upper Cretaceous Yezo Group of Hokkaido, northern Japan. Paleontol. Res. 12, 421–425. https://doi.org/10.2517/prpsj.12.421 (2008).

2. Kobayashi, Y. et al. A new hadrosaurine (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae) from the marine deposits of the Late Cretaceous Hakobuchi Formation, Yezo Group, Japan. Sci. Rep. 9, 12389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48607-1 (2019).

3. Hayakawa, H., Manabe, M. & Carpenter, K. Nodosaurid ankylosaur from the Cenomanian of Japan. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 25, 240–245 (2005).

4. Kubota, K. A list of Mesozoic dinosaur fossils from Japan. Hum. Nat. 28, 97–115 (2017).

5. Zanno, L. E. A taxonomic and phylogenetic re-evaluation of Therizinosauria (Dinosauria: Maniraptora). J. Syst. Paleontol. 8, 503–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2010.488045 (2010).

6. Yao, X., Liao, C. C., Sullivan, C. & Xu, X. A new transitional therizinosaurian theropod from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China. Sci. Rep. 9, 5026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41560-z (2019).

7. Senter, P., Kirkland, J. I. & DeBlieux, D. D. Martharaptor greenriverensis, a new theropod dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Utah. PLoS ONE 7, e43911. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043911 (2012).

8. Hedrick, B. P., Zanno, L. E., Wolfe, D. G. & Dodson, P. The slothful claw: Osteology and taphonomy of Nothronychus mckinleyi and N. graffami (Dinosauria: Theropoda) and anatomical considerations for derived therizinosaurids. PLoS ONE 10, e0129449. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129449 (2015).

9. Sues, H.-D. & Averianov, A. Therizinosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Uzbekistan. Cretac. Res. 59, 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2015.11.003 (2016).

10. Lautenschlager, S. Morphological and functional diversity in therizinosaur claws and the implications for theropod claw evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20140497. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0497 (2014).

11. Russell, D. A. & Dong, Z.-M. The affinities of a new theropod from the Alxa Desert, Inner Mongolia, People’s Republic of China. Can. J. Earth Sci. 30, 2107–2127. https://doi.org/10.1139/e93-183 (1993).

12. Li, D. Q. et al. A large therizinosauroid (Dinosauria : Theropoda) from the Early Cretaceous of northwestern China. Acta Geol. Sin. 81, 539–549 (2007).

13. Xu, X., Tang, Z. L. & Wang, X. L. A therizinosauroid dinosaur with integumentary structures from China. Nature 399, 350–354. https://doi.org/10.1038/20670 (1999).

14. Pu, H. et al. An unusual basal therizinosaur dinosaur with an ornithischian dental arrangement from northeastern China. PLoS ONE 8, e63423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063423 (2013).

15. Saegusa, H., Ikeda, T. & Handa, K. Additional dinosaur materials from the Sasayama Group of Hyogo Prefecture, SW Japan. In Abstracts with Programs the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, 14 (2012).

16. Ikegami, N. & Tomida, Y. A therizinosaur dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Mifune Group in Kyushu, Japan. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 25(3), 73A (2005).

17. Marsh, O. C. Principal characters of American Jurassic dinosaurs, Part V. Am. J. Sci. Ser. 3(21), 417–423 (1881).

18. von Huene, F. Das natürliche system der Saurischia. Zentralblatt für Mineralogy, Geologie und Paläontologie B 1914, 154–158 (1914).

19. Russell, D. A. Therizinosauria. In Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs (eds Currie, P. J. & Padian, K.) 729–730 (Academic Press, 1997).

20. Maleev, E. A. New turtle-like reptile in Mongolia. Priroda 3, 106–108 (1954).

21. Smith, D. K., Sanders, R. K. & Wolfe, D. G. Vertebral pneumaticity of the North American therizinosaur Nothronychus. J. Anat. 238, 598–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13327 (2021).

22. Zanno, L. E. The pectoral girdle and forelimb of the primitive therizinosauroid Falcarius utahensis (Theropoda, Maniraptora): Analyzing evolutionary trends within Therizinosauroidea. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 26, 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634 (2006).

23. Xu, X. et al. A new therizinosauroid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous Iren Dabas Formation of Nei Mongol. Vertebrata Palasiatica 40, 228–240 (2002).

24. Senter, P. A new look at the phylogeny of coelurosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda). J. Syst. Paleontol. 5, 429–463. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1477201907002143 (2007).

25. Barsbold, R. New data on Therizinosaurus (Therizinosauridae, Theropoda). Trans. Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontol. Exped. 3, 76–92 (1976).

26. Bookstein, F. L. Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11, 567–585 (1989).

27. Zanno, L. E., Gillette, D. D., Albright, L. B. & Titus, A. L. A new North American therizinosaurid and the role of herbivory in “predatory” dinosaur evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 276, 3505–3511. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1029 (2009).

28. Horner, J. R. Upper Cretaceous dinosaurs from the Bearpaw Shale (marine) of south central Montana with a checklist of Upper Cretaceous dinosaur remains from marine sediments in North America. J. Paleontol. 53, 566–577 (1979).

29. Kobayashi, Y., Takasaki, R., Kubota, K. & Fiorillo, A. A new basal hadrosaurid (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) from the Latest Cretaceous Kita-ama Formation in Japan: The rise of hadrosaurs. Sci. Rep. 11, 8547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87719-5 (2021).

30. Goloboff, P. A. & Catalano, S. A. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32, 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12160 (2016).

31. Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 3.1.0. (2019).

32. Chinzorig, T. et al. Ornithomimosaurs from the Nemegt Formation of Mongolia: Manus morphological variation and diversity. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 494, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.10.031 (2018).

33. Gower, J. C. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40, 33–51 (1975).

34. Rohlf, F. J. & Slice, D. E. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39, 40–59 (1990).

35. Jolliffe, I. T. Principal Component Analysis 2nd edn. (Springer, 2002).

36. Abdi, H. & Williams, L. J. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2, 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101 (2010).

37. Ostrom, J. H. Functional morphology and evolution of the ceratopsian dinosaurs. Evolution 20, 290–308 (1966).

38. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).

## Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Fujiyuki Endo (Nakagawa Town) for the discovery and donation of this specimen to Nakagawa Museum of Natural History, Genya Masukawa for drawing the silhouette of Paralitherizinosaurus japonicus, and Masato Hattori for creating a life reconstruction of Paralitherizinosaurus japonicus. We also thank Brandon Hedrick (Louisiana State University) for providing us the photos and 3d data of Nothronychus, Lindsay Zanno (North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences) for the photos of Falcarius, Tan Qingwei (Longhao Insitute of Geology and Paleontology) and Xu Xing (Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for the photos of Alxasaurus, and Yao Xi (Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for sharing unpublished information, Kentaro Chiba (Okayama University of Science) for discussions and improving earlier versions of the manuscript, and David Smith (Northland Pioneer College) and anonymous reviewer for reviewing our manuscript.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

Y.K. designed and directed the project. Y.K., R.T., A.F., and T.C. wrote the description. Y.K. and R.T. performed statistical analyses. Y.K., R.T., A.F., and T.C. worked on comparisons. Y.H. conducted the geological fieldwork and study. All contributed to discussions and shared role of editing the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshitsugu Kobayashi.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

### Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Kobayashi, Y., Takasaki, R., Fiorillo, A.R. et al. New therizinosaurid dinosaur from the marine Osoushinai Formation (Upper Cretaceous, Japan) provides insight for function and evolution of therizinosaur claws. Sci Rep 12, 7207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11063-5

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11063-5