Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are at the forefront of research for a wide range of diseases, including osteoarthritis (OA). Despite having attracted the attention of orthopedists, current MSC therapy techniques are limited by poor MSC implantation in tissue defects and lack of lateral tissue integration, which has restricted the efficacy of cell therapy to alleviate OA symptoms only. Here, we developed targeted MSC therapy for OA cartilage using a cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstruct (C-TMN). C-TMN, as an MSC vehicle, consists of a central iron oxide nanoparticle armed with two types of antibodies, one directed at the MSC surface and the other against articular cartilage. We treated rat OA articular cartilage with intra-articular injections of C-TMN with and without exogenous MSCs. We observed substantial improvements in both symptomatic and radiographic OA caused by C-TMN, which was independent of exogenous MSCs. This new approach could predict a promising future for OA management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Tissue engineering and cell therapy are two recent therapeutic possibilities for the management of diseases that cause progressive tissue damage, such as osteoarthritis (OA). OA is a rapidly growing health problem and a common cause of disability that affects up to 240 million middle-aged and elderly people worldwide1. Thus far, compensation of deep chondrocyte loss and hypocellularity in cartilage texture followed by OA progression has not occurred through conventional therapeutic options, including pain medications and classical surgical intervention, which operate the poor intrinsic regenerative responses of hyaline cartilage. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy, as extrinsic cartilage repair factors, are two available advanced cell therapy techniques that have not been able to restore normal articular function in OA patients2. This is mainly due to the inadequate delivery of a sufficient number of therapeutic cells, whether recruited from bone marrow (BM) and vasculature or exogenously injected, to the injured articular cartilage (AC)3, 4. Moreover, a lack of lateral tissue integrity between newly formed repair cartilage and surrounding original tissue restricts the functionality of any regenerated tissue5.
There are various techniques in use that deliver therapeutic cells/drugs to osteoarthritic AC (OAC). Among these, cell surface modification or targeting by nanoparticles (NPs) are two main strategies for efficient cell delivery6. Modification of the therapeutic cell surface is accomplished using a method called “cell painting” in which an antibody (Ab) against a specific cartilage matrix antigen intercalates into the prechondrocyte cell membrane and enables the cell to bind to the cartilage7. Cell targeting peptides (CTPs) are another tool that targets OACs using cell surface changes with high degrees of specificity. Pi et al. explored a peptide sequence with strong chondrocyte binding ability8. Hu et al. synthetized an amino acid cartilage-binding peptide sequence with the dual binding ability to collagen type II (COL2) to a small construct composed of a drug carrier conjugated with a drug (a protease inhibitor). Their identified peptide caused a significant increase in drug retention time and inhibition of cartilage-degrading enzymes9. Despite the comparative therapeutic potential of MSC surface engineering methods, the need to change the cell membrane properties and associated safety concerns have limited their clinical applications. For example, covalent conjugation of peptides or Abs to the surface of therapeutic cells may affect membrane protein function and disturb relevant signaling patterns, leading to abnormal ligand-receptor binding and altered cell fate10.
As a safe alternative, NPs have a history of successful application in the clinic, including imaging, gene therapy and drug delivery. NPs exhibit unique flexibility for wide surface modifications that allow them to be used in various applications. Based on this capability, NPs can be attached to specific homing ligands and make appropriate ligand-receptor binding at the target site11. Moreover, NP-mediated cell-tissue attachment can create a three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment around the trapped cell, enabling efficient interaction with ECM, growth factors and other factors involved in tissue integration and cell differentiation11, 12.
Here, we have used a nanobiotechnology approach for targeted cell delivery into OACs by incorporating iron NPs equipped with antibodies. We conjugated two types of antibodies (Abs), one against CD90 on MSCs and the other for binding to COL2 on the AC surface, with a central iron NP core to produce a cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstruct (C-TMN) for targeted delivery of MSCs to OACs. The Abs present at the surface of the iron core could link both exogenously and endogenously recruited CD90+ MSCs (and other CD90+ mesenchymal progenitor cells presented by different articular tissues) to the cartilage. The second type of Ab on the MSC surface acts against COL2. This initial connection of MSCs to COL2, as a main matrix part of hyaline cartilage that influences tissue integration13, can more confidently integrate MSCs into the cartilage matrix. In addition to preventing misattachment of C-TMN to other types of articular tissues (synovium, periosteom, and cartilage debris from enzymatic destruction of cartilage), tissue integration appears to be further enhanced. C-TMN-mediated binding of MSCs to cartilage can provide a 3D microenvironment for these MSCs and allow them to interact with matricellular proteins, growth factors, and other components of the cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM), all of which are essential for MSC engraftment and tissue integration11.
We hypothesize that targeted cell delivery can increase cellular involvement in the tissue regeneration process and dramatically increase the efficiency of cell therapy. By applying this strategy, we achieved integrated new cartilage, which is highly comparable to the original tissue in terms of function, radiological appurtenance, and OA scores. This therapeutic strategy can provide tremendous promise for the future of OA treatment.
Results
In vitro evaluation of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) binding to a cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstruct (C-TMN)
Figure 1a shows the general schematic concept of C-TMN. Custom-built C-TMN was characterized, and its physicochemical properties were confirmed in vitro. Supporting Information Fig. S1 illustrates the scanning electron microscopy images of both C-TMN and unconjugated iron oxide NPs (Fe3O4; UIN). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) showed that C-TMN (123.1 ± 12.77 nm) was larger than UIN (61.81 ± 7.7 nm, Supporting Information Fig. S2).
Rat BMSCs were used for in vitro investigation of the specific binding ability of C-TMN to MSCs. The immunofluorescence assay (Fig. 1b) and Prussian blue iron staining (Fig. 1c) results showed that C-TMN could more efficiently bind to MSCs than UIN. In addition, Prussian blue staining results revealed that MSCs endocytosed UIN but not C-TMN.
In vivo evaluation of cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstruct (C-TMN)-cartilage binding
We created a rat OA model using intra-articular (IA) injections of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) to induce a partial cartilage defect. Because C-TMN was directed against the AC matrix, we induced OA at the level of a partial AC defect by selecting the appropriate MIA dosage (Supporting Information Fig. S3). To illustrate the binding ability of C-TMN to target tissue (rat AC cartilage), we injected C-TMN and UIN into the articular spaces of two rats with OA, and 24 h later, we used Prussian blue staining to track the C-TMN and UIN. Iron staining results demonstrated that C-TMN, but not UIN, was efficiently linked to both healthy (Fig. 2a) and osteoarthritic (Fig. 2b) cartilage since both tissues contained collagen II. This confirmed the specificity of C-TMN for AC. Prussian blue staining of the synovial membrane in the osteoarthritic rat knee joint showed a lack of nonspecific binding of UIN or C-TMN to the other acceptor surfaces in the joint (Fig. 2c). Conjugation of MSCs to C-TMN at the specified dose (0.5 mg ml−1) showed slight toxicity for MSCs, which was indicative of the safety of C-TMN (Fig. 2d).
In vivo evaluation of the cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstruct (C-TMN) to increase mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy efficacy
The rat BMSCs had characteristics of MSCs, as shown by flow cytometry characterization of the surface epitopes and multipotentiality of these MSCs (Supporting Information Fig. S4). At seven weeks after the IA injection of MIA (four weeks after injection of different treatments), we tested the functional gain of C-TMN to engage the MSCs and target the AC. Assessments of gait analysis, histomorphometry and radiology, as well as molecular evaluation of cartilage tissue four weeks after treatments, revealed that targeted cell therapy with C-TMN increased AC targeting and improved the therapeutic outcome in the presence and absence of exogenous MSCs.
Gait analysis was carried out by reading the paw imprints before and after the desired treatments. Our analyzed data showed that C-TMN, but not UIN, with and without MSCs could reform most walking criteria, including stride length (the distance between two foot impacts of the same limb), step width (transverse distance between the left and right paw), toe-out angle, and step irregularity (two unequal consecutive step lengths) that had been damaged by OA (Fig. 3a–g).
Radiographic images of OA showed significant improvement in the group that received C-TMN compared with UIN and the untreated tissues (Fig. 4a). Histological analysis (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], toluidine blue staining) showed major structural changes in the untreated and UIN-treated groups compared with the C-TMN-treated OAC group. Irregular surface discontinuity, disorientation of chondrocyte columns, mid- and deep loss of cells and matrix, osteophyte and cleft formation, and denudation of bone were the most frequent histologic changes observed (Fig. 4b,c). In addition, the decreased intensity of toluidine blue staining indicated a poor content of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) in the UIN- and untreated AC compared with the C-TMN-treated AC (Fig. 4b). Measurement of inflammatory symptoms in the synovial membrane (synovitis), which was determined by synovial lining cell hyperplasia and joint capsule thickness14 revealed that synovitis was controlled in groups treated with MSCs or C-TMN compared to the untreated group, (Fig. 4d). A slight increase in synovitis score was seen in the C-TMN-treated group compared to the MSC-treated groups (MSC + UIN and MSC + C-TMN); however, this difference is not significant. The potential for C-TMN to enhance therapeutic benefits was further confirmed by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the COL2 deposition pattern (Fig. 4e) and GAG content (Fig. 4f) in OA cartilage four weeks after treatment.
We also sought to address in vivo MSC homing to osteoarthritic AC. The AC tissue samples were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for CD29 and CD90 at one and two weeks after C-TMN and/or MSC injections. The results of numerous studies show that CD29 and CD90 are highly expressed by MSCs15–17. As shown in Fig. 5a, there were significant amounts of CD90+ and CD29+ cells in the C-TMN and MSC + C-TMN groups one week after the injection compared to the control, untreated and MSC + UIN groups. Although the numbers of MSC markers that expressed the cells dramatically decreased during the second week in all of the groups, their counts remained statistically higher in the C-TMN and MSC + C-TMN groups (Fig. 5b).
We assessed the concentration of TNF-alpha and the number of colony forming unit fibroblasts (CFU-Fs) in rat peripheral blood one week after C-TMN and/or MSC injection. The results indicated that treatment with C-TMN slightly increased TNF-alpha levels. MSCs secrete several cytokines, including TNF-alpha, to induce recruitment of endogenous MSCs18. The stimulatory effects of TNF-alpha on the migration of rat BM-MSCs were previously reported19. This result was accompanied by increased numbers of CFU-F (Fig. 5b,c). The CFU-F assay is indicative of the induction of systemic MSC mobilization. C-TMN-mediated entrapment of MSCs on the surface of osteoarthritic cartilage appeared to induce MSCs to secrete molecules involved in endogenous MSC recruitment, such as TNF-alpha, which led to increased numbers of CFU-Fs.
Finally, we performed short tandem repeat (STR) analysis to determine the parentage of the newly formed cartilage in groups that received exogenous MSCs: MSC + UIN and MSC + C-TMN (Fig. 6). For this aim, the origin of DNA in the chondrocytes of the regenerated cartilage was defined at four loci. For the group treated with MSC + UIN, we did not detect any DNA of the allogeneic MSCs for biopsies of four animals at the detection limit of the assay (1 in 1000 cells).
Discussion
The therapeutic efficacy of C-TMN was greater in the absence of any exogenous MSCs, which indicated a high potential of C-TMN for in vivo precursor cell trapping. Thus far, multiple reports have discussed AC regeneration through targeted cell therapy using CTPs9 and bispecific antibodies (cell painting method)7. Both require cell surface modification, and their use in the clinic has been restricted. C-TMN does not have this limitation because its components (Ab and iron NPs) are safe to use in the clinic. As mentioned earlier, in vivo cell tracking for osteochondral tissues is difficult to perform with regular cell labeling methods, while C-TMN does not have this problem.
In this study, the presence of exogenous MSCs was associated with unexpected outcomes. When coinjected with C-TMN, MSCs decreased the regenerative efficiency of C-TMN; when injected alone, some evidence was found in favor of changing the AC zonation (deletion of the middle layer). MSCs simultaneously decreased inflammation in the articular space in the form of synovitis (hyperplasia of fibroblast-like synoviocytes), which was independent of C-TMN (both with and without C-TMN), implying the classic belief about the anti-inflammatory activity of MSCs, either exogenously injected or endogenously recruited into the articular space20, 21. Moreover, assessment of weight bearing, as a pain tolerance criterion, which was measured four weeks after treatment in the OA animals, showed that MSCs increased the ability to weight bear in these animals and could be the result of decreased inflammation. Therefore, it is believed that due to observed joint inflammation reduction in the presence of the exogenous MSCs, concomitant injection of C-TMN with MSCs may be more effective for both MSCs trapping and inflammation control.
On the other hand, the walking pattern in rats, which had changed because of OA progression, greatly improved only in the presence of C-TMN. In addition to the gait evaluation and histological tests, radiologic analysis also indicated progression of repair in the presence of C-TMN. This finding could provide evidence for improvements in both symptomatic and radiographic OA. Because a single cure for both features is rare, C-TMN could be considered an advanced, efficient approach for the clinical management of OA. We observed that even in the absence of exogenous MSCs, C-TMN injection led to promising therapeutic results. Although the present study did not provide any evidence for the involvement of MSCs in cartilage tissue repair, sequential assessments that confirmed the presence of MSCs/progenitor cells in OACs, as well as the higher numbers of PB CFU-F in animals treated with C-TMN that had improved OACs, demonstrated the possibility that exogenous or endogenous trapped MSCs contributed to cartilage repair. Thus, it is possible to treat OA in a less invasive manner through a one-step approach without the need for sampling or in vitro cell culturing.
At the nanoscale level, C-TMN can bind both endogenous recruited or exogenous MSCs to collagen II, which is a principal component of the microfibrillar network. C-TMN, a nanomatchmaker between MSCs and Coll II, may create a unique region around the trapped MSCs that can subsequently be part of the pericellular matrix (PCM) with a thickness of 2–4 µm that surrounds the final chondrocyte. The PCM is rich in proteoglycans, collagen (types II, IV and XI) and fibronectin22, and it modulates AC homeostasis23 by impacting signal transduction into chondrocytes24, 25 and maintaining chondrogenic differentiation26. Evidence supports the hypothesis that PCM can serve as a primary factor in both OA development and inhibition27. It has recently been reported that collagen II in the PCM can act as an extracellular signaling molecule to alter metabolic activity and inhibit chondrocyte hypertrophy28. In the current study, binding of MSCs to the AC matrix introduced collagen II into the MSC closed milieu at the beginning of the chondrocyte differentiation process. This resembles the conditions during which MSCs are treated with collagen and leads to clear promotion of MSC chondrogenic potential29. In addition to MSC trapping and localization at the surface of OA cartilage, C-TMN may promote MSC differentiation into chondrocytes by establishing the MSC-collagen interaction.
As the final step, STR analysis showed that, for the MSC + C-TMN group, three of the four rat DNA loci did not show any genetic polymorphism between host animal cells and cells obtained from regenerated cartilage, whereas one polymorphic marker (D8UIA2) exhibited the presence of exogenous cells in the newly formed cartilage. However, the identification of this informative marker was sufficient to confirm the presence of exogenous cell populations and their participation in the formation of new cartilage.
Here, we demonstrated that the attachment of C-TMN to the surface of osteoarthritic cartilage tissue, may also be a substrate for trapping endogenous progenitor cells in addition to exogenous MSCs. Our hypothesis was further supported when we observed that the peripheral blood samples collected from C-TMN treated animals had slightly increased concentration of TNF-α. According to the literature, TNF-α is not considered as an inflammatory marker of osteoarthritis in rat peripheral blood30. It has been reported that serum level of TNF-α in rat is associated with higher amount of endogenous recruited precursor cells19. However, since TNF-α is one of the important mediators of inflammatory response, more detailed pre-clinical studies in terms of C-TMN mediated inflammatory response and cytokine secretion profile are essential. Notably, we did not examine the exact pro-inflammatory cytokines profile neither before nor after injection of C-TMN; hence, more detailed assessments are required to ensure non-inflammatory consequences of this approach. In addition, further assessment is needed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of C-TMN in the absence of exogenous administered MSCs.
Conclusion
In summary, our research group proposed a novel treatment approach for OA, during which fibrillated cartilage can be managed by a one-step approach, even in the absence of autologous biopsy or exogenous precursor cells. In this method, administration of C-TMN in the presence or absence of MSCs is directed in a simple classical way as a single IA injection that does not need to be repeated. Similar to other preliminary studies, this study should be confirmed by long-term studies because in OA, as a highly progressive disease, destruction may return despite early promising results.
Methods
In vitro cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstruct-mesenchymal stem cell (MSC + C-TMN) binding test
BMSCs were isolated and characterized by flow cytometry for the surface epitopes and ability to differentiate into osteogenic and adipogenic lines (Supporting Information Fig. S4). To visualize the attachment of C-TMN to BMSCs, 5 × 104 BMSCs were cultured in each well of six-well plates. We incubated BMSCs that were 70% confluent with C-TMN or unconjugated iron oxide nanoparticles (UIN) for 15 min at 37 °C. After washing, the MSCs were incubated with goat anti-rabbit FITC-labeled secondary antibody (ab6717, Abcam, USA) for 15 min at 37 °C. The efficacy of MSC + C-TMN binding was checked by an Olympus IX71 microscopic system.
We sought to determine whether C-TMN attached to the MSC surface or if it underwent endocytosis into MSCs. MSCs were incubated with C-TMN or UIN for 24 h at 37 °C for Prussian blue staining31. MSCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained using an iron staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and visualized under a light microscope.
In vitro assessment of cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstruct (C-TMN) cytotoxicity
We examined the possible toxic effects of C-TMN on rat MSC viability and proliferation. Briefly, 5 × 104 cells/ml were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated with 0.0, 0.2, 0.5, and 0.7 mg ml−1 C-TMN for 24 h at 37 °C. After the cells were washed, we assessed the proliferation capacity of the MSCs with the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. We added MTT solution (500 µg ml−1) to each well and incubated the plates for 3 h. Formazan crystals were dissolved in DMSO, and the intensity of the MTT product was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader.
Induction of osteoarthritis (OA) in the rats
All experiments on male Wistar rats were conducted according to the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of Royan Institute (code: IR.ACECR.ROYAN.REC.1394.159). This study is also reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.
Male rats that were greater than 8 weeks old and weighed 200–250 g were used to create an animal OA model. OA was induced by a single IA injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) at doses of 1, 2 or 3 mg per 150 g body weight32. Briefly, MIA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in PBS/physiological saline and injected with a 26-gauge 0.5-inch needle at a volume of 50 μl into the left knee joints. The desired level of damage (partial cartilage defect) was observed only at the 2 mg dose. The 1 mg dose induced slight surface fibrillation, and the 3 mg dose induced full-thickness cartilage loosening. Three weeks after the MIA injection (desired duration for induction of OA), we conducted gait analysis, imaging, and histological tests to confirm the presence of OA in the rats.
In vivo assessment of cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstruct (C-TMN) attachment to cartilage
To evaluate binding efficacy, C-TMN (0.5 mg ml−1) or UIN (0.5 mg ml−1) was injected into the articular spaces of both healthy and OA rats. After 24 h, the animals were sacrificed. The hind limbs were disarticulated at the knee joint, and the knees were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 48 h at 4 °C and decalcified for eight days with 5% nitric acid. The samples were then dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 6-μm-thick frontal sections31. Tissue samples were stained separately with Prussian blue to determine if the iron nanoconstruct attached to the cartilage surface or synovial membrane.
Measuring the in vivo efficacy of cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstructs (C-TMNs) on cartilage repair
The OA model rats were randomly divided into four experimental groups (6 animals per group): MSC + C-TMN, C-TMN, MSC + UIN, and untreated three weeks after the MIA injection. In each experimental group, the right knees were kept intact and considered to be the Ctrl in all figures and histograms. Three weeks after the MIA injection, all rats in the MSC + C-TMN group received IA injections of 50 µl of C-TMN (0.5 mg ml−1) into their left knee joints using a 26-gauge 0.5-inch needle. After 20 min, they received IA injections of 1 × 106 allogeneic BMSCs from 6–8-week-old male rats. The UIN + MSC group animals received IA injections of 50 µl of UIN (0.5 mg ml−1) into the left knee joints three weeks post-MIA injection, followed 20 min later by an IA injection of 1 × 106 allogeneic BMSCs suspended in 50 µl PBS (from 6 to 8-week-old male rats). The OA animals in the C-TMN group received IA injections of 50 µl of C-TMN (0.5 mg ml−1) into the left knee joints 20 min later by injections of 50 µl PBS. In the untreated group, the left MIA-injected knees received twice 50 µl PBS at the same time as C-TMN or UIN and MSC injection. After four weeks, cartilage health and joint function were examined by gait analysis, radiologic imaging, and histologic and immunohistologic analyses in all of the groups.
Gait analysis
To perform the final analysis four weeks after treatment, a walking track as a motor behavior test was carried out using the geometric characteristics of a paw print during locomotion (spatial gait data)33. Briefly, the hind paws of the rats were painted, and the animals were placed at the entrance of the 120 mm long dark tunnel covered with paper. The animals were allowed to walk along the tunnel, and their footprints on the paper were evaluated. At least four complete gait cycles were recorded on each paper in a single trip, and we analyzed at least three artifact-free gait cycles for each animal. The spatial gate variables included the toe-out angle (the angle between orientation of the progression and a reference line in through the foot heel and the third digit), stride length (the distance between two paw prints of the same limb), step width, and step irregularity (two unequal consecutive step lengths). Figure 3a represents the experimental setup of footprint recording and scoring parameters. The mean of three complete gait cycles was analyzed in each animal for all gate analysis parameters. Visual scoring of weight bearing was performed by using a paw pressure rating scale34. Three modes of footprints were seen in this study and scored as 0 (normal, equal weight on both hind paws), 0.5 (unequal toe pressure used to control the hind paws) and 1 (severely impaired weight bearing). The footprint papers were scanned, and we measured the spatial variables by a blind pathologist.
X-ray and histopathological analysis
The radiology procedure was carried out using a micro X-ray while the rats were placed under general anesthesia to evaluate the severity of OA before they were euthanized. Radiographs were obtained in the dorsolateral and anteroposterior positions, and the resultant images were scored based on a numerical rating scale35. Briefly, any alteration in joint space, osteophyte formation and subchondral sclerosis were evaluated and each radiograph was assigned a grade from 0 to 4; 0 = no signs of OA related tissue change; 1 = minimal osteophytes; 2 = decreased joint space and distinct osteophytes; 3 = narrow joint space and moderate osteophyte formation and 4 = subchondral sclerosis and significant reduction in joint space.
Subsequently, six animals per group were sacrificed, and all of the hind limbs were disarticulated at the knee joint. Paraffin blocks were prepared and cut into 6-μm-thick frontal sections to be used for H&E staining. Toluidine blue (a specific staining for cartilage) staining and immunohistochemistry analysis were performed to visualize the collagen II and aggrecan contents of AC in the different groups. Semi-quantitative histopathologic scoring was based on a histological scoring system by Mankin et al. (1971), where the surface smoothness or fibrillation, population and orientation of the chondrocytes, chondrocyte death or hypertrophy, and loss of matrix were considered to be the main histological features for numeric grading. Briefly, normal cartilage tissue received score 0, cartilage with rough surface received score 1, cartilage surface interruption received score 2, and score 3, 4 and 5 were considered for cleft formation, erosion and denudation in cartilage, respectively.
Toluidine blue staining was performed to evaluate the proteoglycan content of the cartilage36 and based on color intensity each slide were scored as 0 = normal, 1 = slight reduction, 2 = moderate reduction, 3 = sever reduction and 4 = no dye noted36. The sum of the scores obtained from both H&E and toluidine blue staining was considered to be the final OA score.
Inflammation in the synovial membrane (synovitis) was determined by synovial lining cell count and joint capsule thickness and was quantified using numerical scoring method by Mapp et al.14. In this method, the ranging from 0 to 3 was applied for scoring of synovial cellularity, where the 1–2 cell thick lining cell layer receives score 0, 3–5 cell thick lining cell layer receives score 1, 6–8 cell thick lining cell layer receives score 2 and > 9 cell thick lining cell layer receives score 3.
All scoring was conducted by a pathologist who was unaware of the treatment assignments. We used the mean value of two sections for histological staining data (H&E and TB) for each animal.
The GAG content of AC was determined with a Sulfated Glycosaminoglycan Assay kit (Blyscan™, Biocolor, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Measurement of spectrophotometer absorbances was performed at 656 nm, and the values were expressed as micrograms of GAG per milligram of cartilage wet weight.
Immunohistochemical staining
We evaluated the expression levels of CD29 and CD90 (as MSC surface markers; one and two weeks after treatments) and COL2 (as a chondrogenic marker; four weeks after treatments) by immunohistochemical analysis. The hind limbs of the rats were disarticulated at the knee joints. Next, the knees were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 48 h at 4 °C and decalcified for eight days in 5% nitric acid. The samples were then dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 6-μm-thick frontal sections. All specimens (n = 6 per group) were immersed in citrate buffer (pH 6) as an antigen retrieval solution at 65 °C. Nonspecific staining was blocked by 30 min incubation of the sections with 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and subsequently incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against rat CD29 (555005, BD Bioscience, USA) and CD90 (ab225, Abcam, USA) as well as collagen II (250484, Abbiotec, USA). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, A-11010, USA) were dropped onto slides (1 h, room temperature). The immunoreaction was visualized by the addition of a 0.02% hydrogen peroxide solution (DAB Substrate Chromogen System; X3468, Dako, USA). The images were taken under a light microscope and evaluated using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software.
Colony forming unit-fibroblasts (CFU-F) assay
One week after the C-TMN and/or MSC injections, we collected peripheral blood from the control and experimental group rats (6 samples per group) following intraperitoneal (IP) administration of ketamine (40–100 mg kg−1) and xylazine (5–13 mg kg−1 body weight). For the colony-forming unit fibroblast (CFU-F) assay, rat peripheral blood mononuclear cells (6 samples per group) were plated in six-well plates at densities of 2 × 104 cells per well. The adherent colonies (> 50 cells) derived from the CFU-Fs were stained with crystal violet and counted after 10 days. Assessment of each group was performed in triplicate.
Measurement of TNF-alpha concentration
One week after C-TMN and/or MSC injections, TNF-alpha levels were measured in blood collected from the intraperitoneal vein of rats. For this aim, the blood samples were centrifuged at 630 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and preserved at −80 °C. The concentrations of TNF-alpha were measured by a quantitative ELISA kit (Demeditec, DE4641, Germany) and reported as pg/ml blood serum.
Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis
We performed STR analysis in the groups with exogenous MSCs (UIN + MSC and MSC + C-TMN). Genomic DNA was extracted from two sources: the superficial cartilage part of the left knee joints (regenerated cartilage of the OA joint treated with MSCs) and the superficial cartilage part of the right knee joints (untreated old cartilage) after the decalcification process using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Four rat DNA loci (D0UIA21, D2UIA8, D8UIA2, and D18UIA2) were amplified37, and specific alleles for the MSC donor and host were determined. The length of the short tandem repeat (STR) amplicons was compared in both sources of biopsies (repaired cartilage from the left knee joint and old cartilage from the right knee joint) to identify the parentage of the cells in the repaired tissues.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software, version 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The results from the animal studies are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE). Data normality was assessed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Comparisons between more than two groups were carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences between each pair of groups were evaluated using the Tukey test. Statistical significance was defined at P < 0.05.
Abbreviations
- MSCs:
-
Mesenchymal stem cells
- OA:
-
Osteoarthritis
- C-TMN:
-
Cell-tissue matchmaking nanoconstruct
- NP:
-
Nanoparticle
- AC:
-
Articular cartilage
- MIA:
-
Monosodium iodoacetate
- IA:
-
Intra-articular
- ACI:
-
Autologous chondrocyte implantation
- BM:
-
Bone marrow
- OAC:
-
Osteoarthritic AC
- Ab:
-
Antibody
- CTPs:
-
Cell targeting peptides
- COL2:
-
Collagen type II
- ECM:
-
Extracellular matrix
- DLS:
-
Dynamic light scattering
- UIN:
-
Unconjugated iron oxide
- GAG:
-
Glycosaminoglycan
- PCM:
-
Pericellular matrix
- STR:
-
Short tandem repeat
References
Zhang, Y. & Jordan, J. M. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 26, 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2010.03.001 (2010).
Diekman, B. O. & Guilak, F. Stem cell-based therapies for osteoarthritis: Challenges and opportunities. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 25, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0b013e32835aa28d (2013).
Weissman, I. L. Translating stem and progenitor cell biology to the clinic: Barriers and opportunities. Science 287, 1442–1446 (2000).
Curley, G. F. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance recovery and repair following ventilator-induced lung injury in the rat. Thorax 67, 496–501. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201059 (2012).
Satue, M., Schuler, C., Ginner, N. & Erben, R. G. Intra-articularly injected mesenchymal stem cells promote cartilage regeneration, but do not permanently engraft in distant organs. Sci. Rep. 9, 10153. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46554-5 (2019).
Nasiri, N., Hosseini, S., Alini, M., Khademhosseini, A. & Baghaban Eslaminejad, M. Targeted cell delivery for articular cartilage regeneration and osteoarthritis treatment. Drug Discov Today 24, 2212–2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2019.07.010 (2019).
Dennis, J. E., Cohen, N., Goldberg, V. M. & Caplan, A. I. Targeted delivery of progenitor cells for cartilage repair. J. Orthop. Res. 22, 735–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2003.12.002 (2004).
Pi, Y. et al. Targeted delivery of non-viral vectors to cartilage in vivo using a chondrocyte-homing peptide identified by phage display. Biomaterials 32, 6324–6332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.017 (2011).
Hu, H. Y. et al. DOTAM derivatives as active cartilage-targeting drug carriers for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc500557s (2015).
Ansboro, S., Greiser, U., Barry, F. & Murphy, M. Strategies for improved targeting of therapeutic cells: Implications for tissue repair. Eur. Cell Mater. 23, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.22203/ecm.v023a24 (2012) ((discussion 318–319)).
Zhao, J. et al. Stem cell-mediated delivery of SPIO-loaded gold nanoparticles for the theranosis of liver injury and hepatocellular carcinoma. Nanotechnology 25, 405101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/40/405101 (2014).
Cheng, K. et al. Magnetic antibody-linked nanomatchmakers for therapeutic cell targeting. Nat. Commun. 5, 4880. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5880 (2014).
Khan, I. M., Gilbert, S. J., Singhrao, S. K., Duance, V. C. & Archer, C. W. Cartilage integration: Evaluation of the reasons for failure of integration during cartilage repair. A review. Eur. Cell Mater. 16, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.22203/ecm.v016a04 (2008).
Mapp, P. I. et al. Differences in structural and pain phenotypes in the sodium monoiodoacetate and meniscal transection models of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartil. 21, 1336–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.06.031 (2013).
Deng, J. et al. A silk fibroin/chitosan scaffold in combination with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to repair cartilage defects in the rabbit knee. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 24, 2037–2046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4944-z (2013).
Tan, S. L., Ahmad, T. S., Selvaratnam, L. & Kamarul, T. Isolation, characterization and the multi-lineage differentiation potential of rabbit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Anat. 222, 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12032 (2013).
Yang, J. et al. Regulation of the secretion of immunoregulatory factors of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) by collagen-based scaffolds during chondrogenesis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 70, 983–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.096 (2017).
Zhang, S. et al. Articular cartilage regeneration: The role of endogenous mesenchymal stem/progenitor cell recruitment and migration. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 50, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.11.001 (2020).
Naaldijk, Y. et al. Migrational changes of mesenchymal stem cells in response to cytokines, growth factors, hypoxia, and aging. Exp. Cell Res. 338, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.08.019 (2015).
Khubutiya, M. S., Vagabov, A. V., Temnov, A. A. & Sklifas, A. N. Paracrine mechanisms of proliferative, anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects of mesenchymal stromal cells in models of acute organ injury. Cytotherapy 16, 579–585 (2014).
Sicco, C. L. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as mediators of anti-inflammatory effects: Endorsement of macrophage polarization. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 6, 1018–1028 (2017).
Miosge, N. et al. Light and electron microscopical immunohistochemical localization of the small proteoglycan core proteins decorin and biglycan in human knee joint cartilage. Histochem. J. 26, 939–945 (1994).
Chen, C., Tambe, D. T., Deng, L. & Yang, L. Biomechanical properties and mechanobiology of the articular chondrocyte. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 305, C1202-1208. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00242.2013 (2013).
Halloran, J. P. et al. Multiscale mechanics of articular cartilage: Potentials and challenges of coupling musculoskeletal, joint, and microscale computational models. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40, 2456–2474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0598-0 (2012).
Khoshgoftar, M., Torzilli, P. A. & Maher, S. A. Influence of the pericellular and extracellular matrix structural properties on chondrocyte mechanics. J. Orthop. Res. 36, 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23774 (2018).
Peters, H. C. et al. The protective role of the pericellular matrix in chondrocyte apoptosis. Tissue Eng. Part A 17, 2017–2024. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0601 (2011).
Loeser, R. F., Collins, J. A. & Diekman, B. O. Ageing and the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 12, 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2016.65 (2016).
Lian, C. et al. Collagen type II suppresses articular chondrocyte hypertrophy and osteoarthritis progression by promoting integrin beta1-SMAD1 interaction. Bone Res. 7, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-019-0046-y (2019).
Tamaddon, M. et al. Monomeric, porous type II collagen scaffolds promote chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Sci. Rep. 7, 43519. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43519 (2017).
Collins, K. H. et al. Relationship between inflammation, the gut microbiota, and metabolic osteoarthritis development: Studies in a rat model. Osteoarthritis Cartil. 23, 1989–1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.014 (2015).
Cheng, K. et al. Magnetic targeting enhances engraftment and functional benefit of iron-labeled cardiosphere-derived cells in myocardial infarction. Circ. Res. 106, 1570–1581. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.109.212589 (2010).
Mohan, G. et al. Application of in vivo micro-computed tomography in the temporal characterisation of subchondral bone architecture in a rat model of low-dose monosodium iodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 13, R210. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3543 (2011).
Beckett, J. et al. Excessive running induces cartilage degeneration in knee joints and alters gait of rats. J. Orthop. Res. 30, 1604–1610. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22124 (2012).
Angeby Moller, K., Kinert, S., Storkson, R. & Berge, O. G. Gait analysis in rats with single joint inflammation: influence of experimental factors. PLoS ONE 7, e46129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046129 (2012).
Morais, S. V. et al. Osteoarthritis model induced by intra-articular monosodium iodoacetate in rats knee. Acta Cir. Bras. 31, 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020160110000010 (2016).
Ostergaard, K., Andersen, C. B., Petersen, J., Bendtzen, K. & Salter, D. M. Validity of histopathological grading of articular cartilage from osteoarthritic knee joints. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 58, 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.58.4.208 (1999).
Walder, R. Y. et al. Short tandem repeat polymorphic markers for the rat genome from marker-selected libraries. Mamm. Genome 9, 1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359900917 (1998).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mr. M. Solgi for his help in data collection. We are also grateful to Ms. M. Zarei for drawing a schematic figure.
Funding
This study was supported by Royan Stem Cell Technology Company under Award No. S/95-11862.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.N. and S.H. and M.B.E. conceived and designed the experiments. N.N. and S.H. carried out the experiments. N.N. wrote the manuscript and analyzed the data. F.R.S. performed the STR. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nasiri, N., Hosseini, S., Reihani-Sabet, F. et al. Targeted mesenchymal stem cell therapy equipped with a cell-tissue nanomatchmaker attenuates osteoarthritis progression. Sci Rep 12, 4015 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07969-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07969-9
This article is cited by
-
Higher ratios of chondrocyte to mesenchymal stem cells elevate the therapeutic effects of extracellular vesicles harvested from chondrocyte/mesenchymal stem cell co-culture on osteoarthritis in a rat model
Cell and Tissue Research (2023)
-
Co-aggregation of MSC/chondrocyte in a dynamic 3D culture elevates the therapeutic effect of secreted extracellular vesicles on osteoarthritis in a rat model
Scientific Reports (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.