The Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary interval is characterized by a ~ 3‰ negative carbon-isotope excursion (CIE) in organic and inorganic marine and terrestrial archives from sections in Europe, such as Peniche (Portugal) and Hawsker Bottoms, Yorkshire (UK). A new high-resolution organic-carbon isotope record, illustrating the same chemostratigraphic feature, is presented from the Southern Hemisphere Arroyo Chacay Melehue section, Chos Malal, Argentina, corroborating the global significance of this disturbance to the carbon cycle. The negative carbon-isotope excursion, mercury and organic-matter enrichment are accompanied by high-resolution ammonite and nannofossil biostratigraphy together with U–Pb CA-ID-TIMS geochronology derived from intercalated volcanic ash beds. A new age of ~ 183.73 + 0.35/− 0.50 Ma for the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary, and 182.77 + 0.11/− 0.15 for the tenuicostatum–serpentinum zonal boundary, is assigned based on high-precision U–Pb zircon geochronology and a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) stratigraphic age model.
The Early Jurassic Pliensbachian–Toarcian (Pl–To; ~ 184.2 Ma1) carbon-isotope excursion (CIE) is marked by a -3‰ shift in δ13C in both bulk-rock carbonate and organic carbon2,3. The stage boundary is associated in time with a second-order extinction event affecting ammonites, belemnites, gastropods, and many other benthic and pelagic groups, that effectively defines it4,5,6. This event precedes the onset of the Early Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event (T-OAE) and its associated Carbon Isotope Excursions (CIEs), appears relatively short-lived (~ 50–200 kyr7) and has been linked to the beginning of activity in the Karoo and Ferrar Large Igneous Provinces (LIP), recording an initial release of volcanogenic CO2 and other gases8,9,10.
The Pl–To event has been studied in the Tethyan and northwest European realms2,7,11, as well as Canada, Chile, and Japan8,12,13,14. The age of the boundary is presently computed based on a combination of cyclostratigraphy and U–Pb geochronology and is estimated to be 184.2 Ma based on an age of 183.2 ± 0.1 Ma for the top of the tenuicostatum Zone1. Other U–Pb ages that help to constrain this boundary include dates from Argentina15, Peru16,17, the USA18 and Canada19,20,21, although these lack tight biostratigraphic control, specifically with respect to correlation with the European ammonite zones. Dateable stratigraphic sections that can be bio- and chemostratigraphically correlated to marine sections elsewhere, specifically to the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) in Peniche, Portugal6, are essential to assigning a precise and accurate age to the base of the Toarcian. An improved age model for the Pl–To event offers greater insight into the driving mechanism of the observed environmental phenomena and the relationship with emplacement of the Karoo and Ferrar Large Igneous Provinces.
Here, we present a new high-resolution carbon-isotope chemostratigraphy and biostratigraphy that is calibrated using U–Pb ID-TIMS zircon dates for the Lower Jurassic (Pliensbachian–Toarcian) Chacay Melehue stream section in Neuquén Province, Argentina. A new age-depth model for this section is also presented, which constrains the age of both the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary and the onset of the negative carbon-isotope excursion in the earliest Toarcian. Using this new geochronology and biostratigraphy, combined with correlations to the GSSP and other well-defined sections, we explore the relationship between the Pliensbachian–Toarcian event and Karoo and Ferrar LIP activity.
Palaeogeography and tectonic setting of the Neuquén Basin
The Neuquén Basin is located on the eastern side of the Andes in west-central Argentina and central Chile, between 32° and 41° S (Fig. 1). The depositional area was a north–south-oriented back-arc basin and foreland, now containing more than 6 km of Triassic to Cenozoic sediments in its most central part29. The basin had a complicated tectonic history associated with the break-up of Gondwana, subduction of the proto-Pacific Plate and the development of the Andean magmatic arc33. Sediments were laid down in several depositional cycles representing deposition from the time of pre-rifting through to foreland-basin development28. The strata studied here form part of the marine Cuyo Group (Lower to Middle Jurassic). The deposition of the Cuyo Group was favoured by marine transgression during subsidence in the post-rift phase of basin development33. Sediments entered the Neuquén Basin from two main source areas: the Chilean Coastal Cordillera that supplied immature volcaniclastic material, and cratonic areas to the south and northeast from which more mineralogically mature sediment was derived34,35,36.
Chacay Melehue stratigraphy and depositional setting
The Arroyo Chacay Melehue stratigraphic section presented here is located at S37°15′ 18.15ʺ, W70°30′ 26.55ʺ (Fig. 1) and comprises more than ~ 1200 m of sediment spanning the latest Pliensbachian to Oxfordian interval37,38. At the base of the section are epiclastic and pyroclastic deposits of the La Primavera Formation, which are thought to have been derived from an andesitic strato-volcano complex, referred to as the Chilean Coastal Cordillera, on the western side of the Neuquén embayment during the latest Triassic–Early Jurassic39,40 (Fig. 1).
Previous studies of sedimentary units at Chacay Melehue suggest that the section was deposited in a marginal marine to offshore environment, recording transgressive–regressive cycles of sedimentation within the Neuquén Basin41. Tuffaceous beds present throughout the section are typically fining upwards and inferred to be largely fine-grained turbidites, redepositing previously laid down ash beds. The presence of discrete volcaniclastic beds at the bottom of the section, and the presence of volcaniclastic material in the sandstone beds throughout, indicates that the section was proximal to a volcanic arc situated to the west42 (Fig. 2). Up-section, coarser grained material decreases in relative abundance, suggesting that either the grain size from the source area changed or that the basin experienced a relative sea-level rise, increasing the distance between source and depocentre at Chacay Melehue. A deepening environment is also suggested by the presence of dark-coloured shale units with organic enrichment stratigraphically above 11 m in the section, suggesting deposition in an oxygen-depleted environment (Fig. 2).
The presence of two distinct, slumped deposits (14.5–17 m, Fig. 2) may suggest increased weathering and local sediment overloading at Pl–To boundary time, possibly due to an enhanced hydrological cycle43. Percival et al.44 and Xu et al.35 have previously suggested enhanced continental weathering during the Pl–To boundary interval and T-OAE based on excursions in Os187/Os188, as well as evidence of centimetre-scale gravity-flow deposits from the T-OAE interval in the Mochras core, Cardigan Bay Basin, UK. Many other records of the T-OAE/CIE also show similar evidence for an enhanced hydrological cycle and increased weathering and erosion during this event, coinciding with and/or following Karoo and Ferrar volcanism12,46.
Geochronological and biostratigraphic constraints at Chacay Melehue
Ammonites and other fossils were sampled wherever found in situ, and tuffaceous samples were collected throughout the section (full details of horizons and determinations are given in the supplementary data).
Biostratigraphic determination of the Chacay Melehue section confirms the presence of deposits of Late Pliensbachian through earliest Toarcian age (Fig. 2). This section was previously studied for geochronology15,47. Sample 2296R collected at 17.34 m in the Chacay Melehue section (see supplementary Fig. 1), and located in the tenuicostatum zone ~ 6 m above the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary, was analysed by Riccardi & Kamo15. This sample has a mean 206Pb/238U age of 183.11 ± 0.12 and a Bayesian eruption age estimate48 of 182.82 ± 0.28 Ma.
Here, we have analysed 4 additional samples, CM-ASH-1, 3, 5 and 6, from within the same section. Data are corrected to the EARTHTIME tracer ET535, based on U–Pb CA-ID-TIMS analyses of individually abraded zircon crystals (see supplementary information section for details on the methodology).
CM-ASH-1, at 8.69 m, has an estimated maximum depositional age of 184.10 ± 0.54 Ma and sits in the latest Pliensbachian disciforme Andean ammonite zone, equivalent to the latest margaritatus–spinatum northwest European ammonite zones50,51,52. The bivalve Kolymonectes weaveri Damborenea is also present here from 0.50 to 12.74 m in the section and has an established stratigraphic range from the Late Pliensbachian through the Early Toarcian53. CM-ASH-1 occurs ~ 5 m below the lowest and first occurrence (FO) of the nannofossil Lotharingius hauffii Grün & Zwili (FO 13.55 m), which has an age range from the Late Pliensbachian, NJ5a subzone to the Callovian, NJ12a subzone54.
CM-ASH-3, at 19.24 m, gives a mean age of 182.836 ± 0.0951 Ma and a Bayesian eruption age estimate of 183.66 ± 0.21 Ma. CM-ASH-3 is located above the FO of Lotharingius barozii Noël (at 17.34 m; ash 2296R occurs at the same level). Lotharingius barozii Noël is characteristic of the latest Pliensbachian to earliest Toarcian disciforme–tenuicostatum Andean ammonite zones50,55,56 as well as occurring above the FO of Dactylioceras (Eodactylites) cf. simplex (Fucini, FO 11.08 m) indicative of the early Toarcian tenuicostatum Zone57. The base of the Andean hoelderi Zone is identified in the section at 21.66 m and is marked by the FO of Harpoceras serpentinum (Schlotheim), Cleviceras exaratum (Young & Bird) and Hildaites cf. murleyi (Moxon). The Andean hoelderi Zone is considered approximately equivalent to the serpentinum (= falciferum) ammonite Zone of northwestern Europe52,55.
At the GSSP for the base of the Toarcian at Peniche (Portugal), the FO of Lotharingius barozii is in strata of the uppermost emaciatum ammonite Zone, ~ 50 cm below the base of the Toarcian Stage. Furthermore, the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary at this locality is marked by the FO of Dactylioceras (Eodactylites) simplex, which is considered to allow global correlation of this level, thereby providing strong support for the proposition that the geochronology in this part of the Chacay Melehue section constrains the age of the boundary. CM-ASH-5 at 23.68 m did not yield an interpretable age as the zircons are inherited or reworked.
The final ash dated in this study, CM-ASH-6 at 25.02 m, gives a weighted mean U–Pb date of 182.84 ± 0.13 Ma, and a Bayesian eruption age estimate of 183.66 ± 0.33 Ma48 and is located ~ 4.5 m above the FO of Harpoceras serpentinum (Schlotheim), Cleviceras exaratum (Young & Bird) and Hildaites cf. murleyi (Moxon) (FO 21.66 m) within the Andean hoelderi Zone, equivalent to the serpentinum (= falciferum) ammonite Zone of northwestern Europe52,55,57.
Leanza et al.47 also sampled and analyzed two ash beds in the Chacay Melehue locality using U–Pb CA-ID-TIMS: one of the ashes, at ~ 24 m in the section, yielded an age of 185.7 ± 0.40 Ma; this bed is located biostratigraphically above the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary, is cross-bedded, and has a very wide array of zircon ages within the zircon population. Consequently, it appears likely that the bed is largely made up of reworked volcaniclastic material, despite the tightly clustered age ranges of the youngest zircons that contribute to this precise date, but probably do not give an accurate depositional age. A second ash bed was dated by Leanza et al.47, which produced an age of 182.3 ± 0.4 Ma; its exact stratigraphic position within the succession is, however, unknown with respect to our measured section. Field photographs in Leanza et al.47 could not be matched to the outcrop at the times of our field investigations.
To improve constraints on the age of the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary and the age of the lower Toarcian tenuicostatum–hoelderi boundary we used Chron.jl49, which is a model framework that allows the interpretation of mineral age spectra in a stratigraphic context. Chron.jl48 uses a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model in which stratigraphic superposition is imposed on U–Pb zircon dates49. The result is an age–depth model incorporating dates from all beds above and below each sample to produce an internally consistent age (Fig. 3B,C.). This model allowed us to extrapolate ages at specific depths, assuming relatively constant sedimentation rates of the deposits between the ash beds that provide the geochronological constraints (Fig. 3C). To determine the age of the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary, we assessed the stratigraphic position of the boundary to be at 11.08 m in the section, concurrent with the FO of Dactylioceras (Eodactylites), and interpolated the age to be 183.73 + 0.35/− 0.50 Ma (Fig. 3). A similar exercise was performed for the tenuicostatum–hoelderi zone boundary (concurrent with the tenuicostatum–serpentinum zone boundary in NW Europe), using the FO of Harpoceras serpentinum (Schlotheim), Cleviceras exaratum (Young & Bird) and Hildaites cf. murleyi (Moxon) (FO 21.66 m). Thus, at 21.66 m in the section an age of 182.77 + 0.11/− 0.15 Ma was interpolated from the model (Fig. 3C).
The age–depth model coupled with biostratigraphy provides a new more precise age for two of the major events in the earliest Toarcian as well as a new age for the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary.
The Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary carbon-isotope excursion
Total organic carbon (TOC) concentrations across the studied stratigraphic interval range from values of 0–1% in the uppermost Pliensbachian disciforme Zone (0 to 11 m, Fig. 2), to values of 1.5–4% in the tenuicostatum Zone (11 to 22 m), and values of 0.5–1% higher up in the section. As the TOC content increases up through the tenuicostatum Zone, the δ13CTOC record shows a marked negative shift, initiated at ~ 13 m in the studied section (Fig. 3), and with values gradually falling from a background of ~ − 27.5‰, to − 30.1‰ at ~ 15 m (Fig. 3). The δ13CTOC values above ~ 16 m in the section shows a gradual positive shift, returning to ~ − 26.5‰ at ~ 18 m. Subsequently, from ~ 18 to 30 m in the section, δ13CTOC values are relatively stable, oscillating by 1–2‰ around an average value of − 27‰ (Fig. 2). In the upper part of the studied section, above a poorly exposed stratigraphic interval, δ13CTOC values are significantly more negative, averaging around ~ − 29‰ and falling as low as − 29.8‰; this shift to lower values coincides with a gradual increase to relatively more elevated TOC values of up to ~ 2% in this uppermost part of the section. Tmax °C values range from 296 to 506 °C throughout the section, Hydrogen Index values range from 3 to 23 mg HC/gTOC, and S2/S3 < 1 (S2 = mg hydrocarbons/ g rock, S3 = mg CO2 / rock; RockEval data are available in supplementary data file), suggesting that organic matter in the section is made up of higher plant material and/or hydrogen-poor organic constituents that have been oxidized and/or suffered thermal maturation59.
The carbon-isotope profile of Chacay Melehue can be chemostratigraphically correlated to other biostratigraphically well-constrained sections, specifically to the base-Toarcian GSSP in Peniche, Portugal6 (Fig. 3). The δ13C signatures of Chacay Melehue (bulk organic carbon) and Peniche (bulk carbonate) show a remarkably similar ~ 2‰ negative carbon-isotope excursion across the Pl–To boundary. Additionally, the combined chemo-, chrono- and biostratigraphic framework from Chacay Meleue is here also compared and correlated with other stratigraphically well-constrained sections such as from the Mochras borehole, Cardigan Bay Basin, UK45,60,61 and Almonacid de la Cuba, Teruel Basin, Spain51 (Fig. 4, Supp. Fig. 2).
In the Chacay Melehue section, sedimentary mercury [Hg] concentrations are 300–700 ppb in the lowest 5 m of the section with values decreasing to 20–50 ppb through the sediments displaying the negative excursion in the section (~ 10 to 20 m; Fig. 4). Hg/TOC values show a small increase at the Pl–To transition, against a falling trend and, at around 23 m in the studied succession, with values of up to 0.23 ppm/wt%, are followed upwards by reduced values of ~ 0.05 ppm/weight% (Fig. 4). Hg/TOC values strongly increase up to 0.67 ppm/weight % towards the top of the studied succession, coinciding also with increasing TOC values and decreasing δ13CTOC values (Fig. 4), possibly representing the onset of the T-OAE negative CIE. The observed trend in the Hg/TOC profile at Chacay Melehue is similar in shape and order of magnitude to other records, such as at Mochras (Cardigan Bay Basin, UK) and Peniche (Lusitanian Basin, Portugal61; Fig. 4).
Age implications of Chacay Melehue chemo-, chrono- and biostratigraphy for the Pliensbachian–Toarcian boundary and T-OAE
The onset of environmental perturbations at the Pl–To boundary likely resulted in global warming, oceanic anoxia, intensified weathering, and a calcification crisis, in a similar manner to, and setting the stage for, the larger perturbations recorded during the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event that had its focus in the serpentinum Zone (= ~ falcifererum Zone = ~ hoelderi Zone). Caruthers et al.8,64 suggested that the long-term environmental change that resulted in pulsed extinction events in the Pliensbachian–Toarcian appear to have been associated with the onset and peaks of intrusive magmatism in Karoo, Ferrar and silicic volcanism in Chon Aike (Figs. 1, 5); however, these igneous provinces are chemically distinct, and resulted in different environmental impacts. For example, the Karoo LIP was emplaced relatively rapidly and intruded into Permian organic-rich sediments65,66,67,68 (Fig. 5), whereas Chon Aike, which is a silicic Large Igneous Province, was emplaced over a longer period and likely did not result in rapid hydrothermal venting of greenhouse gases, but more gradual gaseous release over a relatively long period from ~ 160–190 Ma69.
The chemostratigraphy from Chacay Melehue strengthens the case for the global nature of the previously observed Pl–To negative carbon-isotope excursion and disturbance to the carbon cycle. The ~ 3‰ negative excursion in δ13CTOC values closely follows the stratigraphically lowest occurrence of Dactylioceras (Eodactylites) cf. simplex (Fucini) in the section, a taxon closely allied to the principal marker for the base Toarcian GSSP at Peniche, Portugal6 (Fig. 4).
In addition, the Chacay Melehue section provides new constraints for the age of the Pl–To boundary at ~ 183.73 + 0.35/− 0.50 Ma, as well as for the tenuicostatum–serpentinum zonal boundary at ~ 182.77 + 0.11/− 0.15 Ma, with the latter occurring stratigraphically close to the onset of the negative carbon-isotope excursion associated with the T-OAE.
These dates and zonal durations are consistent with recent astrochronological estimates for the ages of this boundary60, which suggest a million-year duration for the earliest Toarcian tenuicostatum (or concurrent polymorphum) Zone7,60,70,71,72,73. Furthermore, astrochronological constraints on the duration of the Pl–To negative CIE suggest a duration of ~ 200 kyr7,72, which agrees with the geochronological constraints on the duration of this event, as illustrated here.
Integrated global correlation of the Chacay Melehue data with other successions well documented by ammonite biostratigraphy, chemostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy and/or geochronology (Fig. 4), demonstrate that the Pl–To boundary event may be tied to the onset of LIP activity in Karoo but pre-dates the peak of substantial magmatism in Karoo and Ferrar by ~ 400 kyr (Fig. 5). This relationship between the Pl-To boundary event and the onset of Karoo magmatic activity is further supported by the increase in elemental mercury in the Chacay Melehue section, and correlative records (Fig. 4), inferred to have been volcanogenically derived and transported through the atmosphere before final deposition in marine sediments.
Hesselbo, S. P., Ogg, J. G., Ruhl, M., Hinnov, L. A. & Huang, C. J. The Jurassic Period. In Geologic Time Scale 2020 (eds Gradstein, F. M. et al.) (Elsevier, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00026-7.
Littler, K., Hesselbo, S. P. & Jenkyns, H. C. A carbon-isotope perturbation at the Pliensbachian-Toarcian boundary: Evidence from the Lias Group, NE England. Geol. Mag. 147, 181–192 (2009).
Hesselbo, S. P., Jenkyns, H. C., Duarte, L. V. & Oliveira, L. C. V. Carbon-isotope record of the Early Jurassic (Toarcian) Oceanic Anoxic Event from fossil wood and marine carbonate (Lusitanian Basin, Portugal). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 253, 455–470 (2007).
Little, C. T. S. & Benton, M. J. Early Jurassic mass extinction: A global long-term event. Geology 23, 495–498 (1995).
Correia, V. F., Riding, J. B., Duarte, L. V., Fernandes, P. & Pereira, Z. The palynological response to the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event (Early Jurassic) at Peniche, Lusitanian Basin, western Portugal. Mar. Micropaleontol. 137, 46–63 (2017).
da Rocha, R. B. et al. Base of the toarcian stage of the lower jurassic defined by the global boundary stratotype section and point (GSSP) at the Peniche Section (Portugal). Episodes 39, 460–481 (2016).
Martinez, M., Krencker, F.-N., Mattioli, E. & Bodin, S. Orbital chronology of the Pliensbachian–Toarcian transition from the Central High Atlas Basin (Morocco). Newsl. Stratigr. 50, 47–69 (2017).
Caruthers, A. H., Smith, P. L. & Gröcke, D. R. The Pliensbachian-Toarcian (Early Jurassic) extinction, a global multi-phased event. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 386, 104–118 (2013).
Burgess, S. D., Bowring, S. A., Fleming, T. H. & Elliot, D. H. High-precision geochronology links the Ferrar large igneous province with early-Jurassic Ocean anoxia and biotic crisis. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 415, 90–99 (2015).
Atlas, M. et al. Bulk-carbonate and belemnite carbon-isotope records across the Pliensbachian-Toarcian boundary on the northern margin of Gondwana. Sci. Rep. 466, 128–136 (2017).
Harazim, D. et al. Spatial variability of watermass conditions within the European Epicontinental Seaway during the Early Jurassic (Pliensbachian-Toarcian). Sedimentology 60, 359–390 (2012).
Them, T. R. et al. Evidence for rapid weathering response to climatic warming during the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event. Sci. Rep. 7, 5003 (2017).
Fantasia, A. et al. The Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event in southwestern Gondwana: An example from the Andean Basin, northern Chile. J. Geol. Soc. 175, 883–902 (2018).
Ikeda, M. et al. Carbon cycle dynamics linked with Karoo-Ferrar volcanism and astronomical cycles during Pliensbachian-Toarcian (Early Jurassic). Global Planet. Change 170, 163–171 (2018).
Riccardi, A. C. & Kamo, S. Biostratigraphy and geochronology of the Pliensbachian-Toarcian boundary in Argentina. in XIX Congreso Geológico Argentino: Estratigrafía y Sedimentología, Junio 2014, Córdoba. T1–42 (2014).
Sell, B. et al. Evaluating the temporal link between the Karoo LIP and climatic–biologic events of the Toarcian Stage with high-precision U-Pb geochronology. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 408, 48–56 (2014).
Sell, B. et al. Response to comment on “Evaluating the temporal link between the Karoo LIP and climatic-biologic events of the Toarcian Stage with high-precision U-Pb geochronology”. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 434, 353–354 (2016).
de Lena, L. F. et al. The driving mechanisms of the carbon cycle perturbations in the late Pliensbachian (Early Jurassic). Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12 (2019).
Them, T. R. et al. High-resolution carbon isotope records of the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event (Early Jurassic) from North America and implications for the global drivers of the Toarcian carbon cycle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 459, 118–126 (2017).
Pálfy, J. et al. New U/Pb zircon ages integrated with ammonite biochronology from the Jurassic of the Canadian Cordillera. Can. J. Earth Sci. 37, 549–567 (2000).
Pálfy, J., Parrish, R. R. & Smith, P. L. A U/Pb age from the Toarcian (Lower Jurassic) and its use for time scale calibration through error analysis of biochronologic dating. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 146, 659–675 (1997).
Blakey, R. Early Jurassic rectangular paleogeographic map in Mollweide. Deep Time Maps. http://cpgeosystems.com/200moll.jpg (2016).
Pankhurst, R. J., Riley, T. R., Fanning, C. M. & Kelley, S. P. Episodic silicic volcanism in Patagonia and the Antarctic Peninsula: Chronology of magmatism associated with the break-up of Gondwana. J. Petrol. 41, 605–625 (2000).
Pankhurst, R. J. et al. The Chon Aike province of Patagonia and related rocks in West Antarctica: A silicic large igneous province. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 81, 113–136 (1998).
Luttinen, A. V. Bilateral geochemical asymmetry in the Karoo large igneous province. Sci. Rep. 8, 5223 (2018).
Leat, P. T. On the long-distance transport of Ferrar magmas. J. Geol. Soc. Lon. 302, 45–61 (2008).
Riley, T. R., Leat, P. T., Pankhurst, R. J. & Harris, C. Origins of large volume rhyolitic volcanism in the Antarctic Peninsula and Patagonia by crustal melting. J. Petrol. 42, 1043–1066 (2001).
Vicente, J. C. Dynamic Paleogeography of the Jurassic Andean basin: Pattern of regression and general considerations on main features. Revista de la Asociacion Geologica Argentina. 61, 408–437 (2006).
Howell, J. A., Schwarz, E., Spalletti, L. A. & Veiga, G. D. The Neuquén Basin: An overview. Geol. Soc. Lon. Spec. Pub. 252, 1–14 (2005).
Vergara, M., Levi, B., Nystrom, J. O. & Cancino, A. Jurassic and early Cretaceous island arc volcanism, extension, and subsidence in the Coast Range of central Chile. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 107, 1427–1440 (1995).
Ramos, V. A. & Folguera, A. Tectonic evolution of the Andes of Neuquén: Constraints derived from the magmatic arc and foreland deformation. Geol. Soc. Lon. Spec. Pub. 252, 15–35 (2005).
Franzese, J. R. & Spalletti, L. A. Late Triassic–Early Jurassic continental extension in southwestern Gondwana: Tectonic segmentation and pre-break-up rifting. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 14, 257–270 (2001).
Vergani, G. D., Tankard, A. J., Belotti, H. J. & Welsink, H. J. Tectonic Evolution and Paleogeography of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina. In Memoir 62: Petroleum Basins of South America (eds Tankard, A. J. et al.) (AAPG, 1995).
Caminos, R., Cingolani, C. A., Hervé, F. & Linares, E. Geochronology of the pre-Andean metamorphism and magmatism in the Andean Cordillera between latitudes 30° and 36°S. Earth Sci. Rev. 18, 333–352 (1982).
Coira, B., Davidson, J., Mpodozis, C. & Ramos, V. Tectonic and magmatic evolution of the Andes of northern Argentina and Chile. Earth Sci. Rev. 18, 303–332 (1982).
Eppinger, K. J. & Rosenfeld, U. Western margin and provenance of sediments of the Neuquén Basin (Argentina) in the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous. Tectonophysics 259, 229–244 (1996).
Riccardi, A. C. The Jurassic of Argentina and Chile. In Phanerozoic Geology of the World: The Mesozoic (eds Moullade, M. & Nairn, A. E. M.) 201–263 (Elsevier, 1983).
Damborenea, S. E. Middle Jurassic inoceramids from Argentina. J. Paleontol. 64, 736–759 (1990).
Llambías, E. J. & Leanza, H. A. Lahar deposits of the Molles Formation in Chacay Melehue, Neuquén: Evidence of Jurassic volcanism in the Neuquén basin. Revista de la Asociacion Geológica Argentina. 60, 552–558 (2005).
Schiuma, M. & Llambias, E. J. New ages and chemical analysis on lower Jurassic Volcanism close to the Dorsal De Huincul, Neuquén. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina. 63, 644–652 (2008).
Iglesia-Llanos, M. P. & Riccardi, A. C. The Neuquén composite section: Magnetostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the marine lower Jurassic from the Neuquén basin (Argentina). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 181, 443–457 (2000).
Gulisano, C. A. & Gutiérrez Pleimling, A. R. Field Guide The Jurassic of the Neuquén Basin (a) Neuquén Province. Asociación Geológica, Argentina. (1995).
Cohen, A. S., Coe, A. L., Harding, S. M. & Schwark, L. Osmium isotope evidence for the regulation of atmospheric CO2 by continental weathering. Geology 32, 157 (2004).
Percival, L. M. E. et al. Osmium isotope evidence for two pulses of increased continental weathering linked to Early Jurassic volcanism and climate change. Geology 44, 759–762 (2016).
Xu, W. et al. Evolution of the Toarcian (Early Jurassic) carbon-cycle and global climatic controls on local sedimentary processes (Cardigan Bay Basin, UK). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 484, 396–411 (2018).
Izumi, K., Kemp, D. B., Itamiya, S. & Inui, M. Sedimentary evidence for enhanced hydrological cycling in response to rapid carbon release during the early Toarcian oceanic anoxic event. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 481, 162–170 (2018).
Leanza, H. A. et al. The Chachil Limestone (Pliensbachian–earliest Toarcian) Neuquén Basin, Argentina: U-Pb age calibration and its significance on the Early Jurassic evolution of southwestern Gondwana. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 42, 171–185 (2013).
Keller, C. B., Schoene, B. & Samperton, K. M. A stochastic sampling approach to zircon eruption age interpretation. Geochemical Perspectives Letters (Online). 8. LLNL-JRNL-738859 (2018).
Keller, C. B. Chron.jl: A Bayesian framework for integrated eruption age and age-depth modelling. osf.io (software), 2018: https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/TQX3F
Mattioli, E. & Erba, E. Synthesis of calcareous nannofossil events in Tethyan Lower and Middle Jurassic succession. Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratigr. 105, 343–376 (1999).
Page, K. N. The Lower Jurassic of Europe: Its subdivision and correlation. Geol. Surv. Denmark Greenland Bull. 1, 21–59 (2003).
Riccardi, A. C. The marine Jurassic of Argentina: A biostratigraphic framework. Episodes 31, 326–335 (2008).
Damborenea, S. E. Early Jurassic Bivalvia of Argentina. Part 3: Superfamilies Monotoidea, Pectinoidea, Plicatuloidea and Dimyoidea. Palaeontographica Abteilung B. 265, 1–199 (2002).
Bown, P. R. & Cooper, M. K. E. Jurassic. In Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy. British Micropalaeontological Society Publication Series (ed. Bown, P. R.) 34–85 (Chapman & Hall, 1998).
Page, K. N. A sequence of biohorizons for the subboreal province Lower Toarcian in Northern Britain and their correlation with a submediterranean standard. Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratigr. 110, 109–114 (2004).
Riccardi, A. C. EL Jurásico de la Argentina y sus Amonites. Revista de la Asociacion Geologica Argentina. 63, 625–643 (2008).
da Rocha, R. B. et al. Base of the Toarcian stage of the lower Jurassic defined by the Global Boundary Stratotype section and point (GSSP) at the Peniche section (Portugal). Episodes 39, 460–481 (2016).
Copestake, P. & Johnson, B. Lower Jurassic Foraminifera from the Llanbedr (Mochras Farm) Borehole, North Wales, UK. Monogr. Palaeontogr. Soc. 167, 1–403 (2013).
Tissot, B. P. & Welte, D. H. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence 2nd edn. (Springer, 1984).
Storm, M. S. et al. Orbital pacing and secular evolution of the Early Jurassic carbon cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 3974–3982 (2020).
Percival, L. M. E. et al. Globally enhanced mercury deposition during the end-Pliensbachian extinction and Toarcian OAE: A link to the Karoo-Ferrar Large Igneous Province. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 428, 267–280 (2015).
Barrón, E., Comas-Rengifo, M. J. & Duarte, L. V. Palynomorph succession of the upper Pliensbachian-Lower Toarcian of the Peniche section (Portugal). Comunicaçõe Geológicas. 100, 55–61 (2013).
Comas-Rengifo, M. J., Gómez, J. J., Goy, A. M., Osete, L. & Palencia-Ortas, A. The base of the Toarcian (Early Jurassic) in the Almonacid de la Cuba section (Spain). Ammonite biostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy and isotope stratigraphy. Episodes. 33, 15–22 (2010).
Caruthers, A. H., Smith, P. L. & Grocke, D. R. The Pliensbachian-Toarcian (Early Jurassic) extinction: A North American perspective. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 505, 225–243 (2014).
Svensen, H. et al. Hydrothermal venting of greenhouse gases triggering Early Jurassic global warming. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 256, 554–566 (2007).
Svensen, H., Corfu, F., Polteau, S., Hammer, Ø. & Planke, S. Rapid magma emplacement in the Karoo Large Igneous Province. Sci. Rep. 325–326, 1–9 (2012).
Ivanov, A. V. et al. Timing and genesis of the Karoo-Ferrar large igneous province: New high precision U-Pb data for Tasmania confirm short duration of the major magmatic pulse. Chem. Geol. 455, 32–43 (2017).
Greber, N. D. et al. New high precision U-Pb ages and Hf isotope data from the Karoo large igneous province; implications for pulsed magmatism and early Toarcian environmental perturbations. Results Geochem. 1, 100005 (2020).
Pankhurst, R. J. et al. The Chon Aike province of Patagonia and related rocks in West Antarctica: A silicic large igneous province. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 81, 113–136 (1998).
Thibault, N. et al. The wider context of the Lower Jurassic Toarcian oceanic anoxic event in Yorkshire coastal outcrops, UK. Proc. Geologists’ Association. 129, 372–391 (2018).
Huang, C. & Hesselbo, S. P. Pacing of the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event (Early Jurassic) from astronomical correlation of marine sections. Gondwana Res. 25, 1348–1356 (2014).
Ruebsam, W., Münzberger, P. & Schwark, L. Chronology of the Early Toarcian environmental crisis in the Lorraine Sub-Basin (NE Paris Basin). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 404, 273–282 (2014).
Ruebsam, W. & Moujahed, Al.-H. Orbitally synchronized late Pliensbachian–early Toarcian glacio-eustatic and carbon-isotope cycles. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 577, 110562 (2021).
This research was made possible through financial contributions of the Scholarship Coordination Office, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and Khalifa University Grant CIRA-066-2019. We also acknowledge funding from Shell International Exploration & Production B.V., the Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) (Grant Number NE/N018508/1) and NIGFSC facilities grant (IP-1466-0514), and, the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, Argentina). Daniel Condon publishes with the approval of the Executive Director of the British Geological Survey (NERC). We thank Tamsin Mather for access to the Lumex Hg analyser at Oxford. This manuscript is a contribution to IGCP 655 (IUGS-UNESCO): Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event: Impact on marine carbon cycle and ecosystems, IGCP 632 (IUGS-UNESCO): Continental Crises of the Jurassic: Major Extinction events and Environmental Changes within Lacustrine Ecosystems, and IGCP 739 (IUGS-UNESCO): The Mesozoic–Paleogene Hyperthermal Events. We also thank Kevin Page for his help with ammonite biostratigraphy in the Mochras core.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Suwaidi, A.H., Ruhl, M., Jenkyns, H.C. et al. New age constraints on the Lower Jurassic Pliensbachian–Toarcian Boundary at Chacay Melehue (Neuquén Basin, Argentina). Sci Rep 12, 4975 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07886-x
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.