Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

New insights on commemoration of the dead through mortuary and architectural use of pigments at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey

Abstract

The cultural use of pigments in human societies is associated with ritual activities and the creation of social memory. Neolithic Çatalhöyük (Turkey, 7100–5950 cal BC) provides a unique case study for the exploration of links between pigments in burials, demographic data and colourants in contemporary architectural contexts. This study presents the first combined analysis of funerary and architectural evidence of pigment use in Neolithic Anatolia and discusses the possible social processes underlying the observed statistical patterns. Results reveal that pigments were either applied directly to the deceased or included in the grave as a burial association. The most commonly used pigment was red ochre. Cinnabar was mainly applied to males and blue/green pigment was associated with females. A correlation was found between the number of buried individuals and the number of painted layers in the buildings. Mortuary practices seem to have followed specific selection processes independent of sex and age-at-death of the deceased. This study offers new insights about the social factors involved in pigment use in this community, and contributes to the interpretation of funerary practices in Neolithic Anatolia. Specifically, it suggests that visual expression, ritual performance and symbolic associations were elements of shared long-term socio-cultural practices.

Introduction

The use of pigments by past societies has been considered as evidence for modern human behaviour based on its association with symbolic activities and rituals1,2,3,4. Middle Stone Age sites younger than 180 kya in Africa3,5,6,7,8,9 and the Middle East10,11,12 show systematic evidence of red pigment use. In mortuary contexts, pigments became prevalent during the Upper Palaeolithic in Europe13,14,15,16,17, but in the Upper Palaeolithic Near-East, the number of recovered burials remains relatively small18,19, as is the evidence for ochre processing and ochre use18,19,20,21.

The earliest Near Eastern case of pigment use in an architectural context dates back to the Early Natufian period with a building coated with plaster and red paint from the site of Ain Mallaha-Eynan22. Also attributed to Natufian traditions is the origin of complex manipulations of skeletal elements such as the removal, modelling and painting of crania23,24, although evidence for funerary pigments remains limited to only a few sites; Azraq 1824, Ain Mallaha-Eynan25 and Hayonim cave26. In the early Pre-Pottery Neolithic period (PPNA) both architectural and funerary evidence of pigments continues to remain scarce. The sites of Dja’de el-Mughara and Mureybet, located along the Syrian Euphrates (northern Levant), show evidence of architectural paintings during different Pre-Pottery Neolithic phases with emerging variation in mortuary practices, limited pigment applications and secondary deposits in clear connection with the architecture25,27,28,29,30,31. It is only during the second half of the 9th millennium and the 8th millennium BC that architectural paintings and funerary pigment use seem to spread across a large area reaching from the Southern Levant to Central Anatolia25,32. Increasingly common examples of secondary handling of human remains in single or collective burials, removal of crania and the presence of elaborate burial associations signal selection and increased symbolism that continued through the Neolithic24,33,34,35,36.

Focussing on Anatolia specifically, changes in mortuary practices were accompanied by a growing variability in pigment processing and application. The Epipalaeolithic levels of Pınarbaşı show evidence of ochre processing as well as the presence of colourants in a burial context37,38. The Early Neolithic site of Göbekli Tepe, known for its architectural decorations of stone carvings and bas reliefs, provided cranial fragments with traces of red ochre but was lacking burials39. Near the northern extension of the Fertile Crescent, black and red pigments were observed on bones recovered at the Early Neolithic sites of Körtik Tepe, Demirköy and Hasankeyf Höyük40,41,42. Several phases from Çayönü revealed buildings with red paint and ‘skull buildings’, but without reported pigment on human remains43,44. In Central Anatolia, red paint was found on walls, floors and benches in ‘special’ or communal buildings at Aşıklı Höyük45. In contrast, ochre in burials and on ornaments was rare and traces were only found on one bead, one shell and in the burials of two children and one adult female46,47,48. At the site of Musular, red pigment was observed on floors and benches, but not reported on human remains49. In Boncuklu Höyük, red colourants were attested on walls and floors, as well as in burials; occasionally on crania and with secondary/tertiary depositions of human remains50,51,52. The late Neolithic phases of Köşk Höyük revealed a wall painting32,53 and 13 out of 19 plastered human crania were covered with red ochre54,55. The site of Tepecik-Çiftlik has one architectural feature with red and blue colourants in a building dated to the final Neolithic period32, but no pigments were reported on any of the more than 170 human remains56,57.

These examples suggest important symbolic, ritual and social behaviour in the Anatolian Epipalaeolithic and Neolithic periods. Repetitive use of imagery, secondary mortuary treatments and increased circulation of human bones highlight integrated systems of social memory by linking the living to the dead and, thus, creating the basis for social differentiation58,59,60. A problem raised in the past, however, is that many discussions focus on post-mortem skull removal while other factors central to mortuary practices remain under-explored, such as associations between burial contexts and architectural features61. The fact that archaeological contexts of paintings and burials are not physically connected is often a reason to ignore correlations between the two, despite ethnographic examples demonstrating the overlap between domestic and ritual practice60,62,63,64,65,66,67. The lack of analyses linking the dead, the physical space of the house and colourant use has been raised about Çatalhöyük specifically62,68,69, but no attempt has been made so far to fill this gap. The long-running, 25-year excavation project at Çatalhöyük provides the opportunity to compare the use of colourants in architectural and funerary contexts in several buildings from successive periods in order to discuss the possible social relevance and symbolic meaning of pigments within this Neolithic society.

Çatalhöyük is one of the largest Neolithic settlements in Anatolia35,70. Archaeological excavations of the site took place between 1961 and 1965 under the direction of James Mellaart, and from 1993 to 2017 by Ian Hodder71. The Neolithic occupation on the East Mound at Çatalhöyük can be placed between 7100 cal BC and 5950 cal BC72, a timeframe encompassing the Late Pre-Pottery Neolithic B and the beginning of the Pottery Neolithic.

The Neolithic occupation of Çatalhöyük is subdivided into four phases according to stratigraphic, radiocarbon, archaeological and anthropological data72,73,74,75. These phases pinpoint important cultural and demographic changes. Between the Early (7100–6700 cal BC) and the Middle occupation periods (6700–6500 cal BC) the population gradually rose, houses became larger and symbolic elaboration at the site increased74,75. During the Late (6500–6300 cal BC) and Final (6300–5950 cal BC) occupation periods households became more autonomous75,76. From 6500 cal BC until the abandonment of the East Mound available data suggest greater mobility of the population, economic independence among households, and increased specialisation and differentiation74,75. The same traits are shared with the later cultural and socio-economic development during the Chalcolithic between the East Mound and neighbouring West Mound74,75,76.

The excavation of Neolithic Çatalhöyük has produced an important number of primary and secondary depositions. Burials mostly occurred within domestic structures during the occupation phase of houses and for a minority in construction and abandonment phases of the buildings77. Adults were most often placed in a flexed position, located beneath the northern and eastern platforms of the central room. Perinate, neonate and infants were buried in more variable locations within the house77,78,79,80. In the Final period, the houses no longer accommodate distinct platforms with burials74 and there is an increase in the ratio of secondary to primary depositions77. A well-known feature at Çatalhöyük is the presence of pigments in both funerary and architectural contexts. Although the use of pigments is recognised as one of the defining elements of this community, previous research has focused mainly on one aspect (presence in architectural contexts) of its variability32,68,81,82,83.

This study provides, for the first time, a fine-grained quantitative analysis of the available funerary and architectural data related to pigment use at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. By means of a joint study of different datasets, until recently considered in isolation from each other, the aim is to offer a new perspectives on the possible social processes involved in the use of pigments in this society. To do this, the following research questions are addressed: (a) Which pigments were used at Neolithic Çatalhöyük and in which relative frequency? (b) In which manner were pigments deposited in funerary contexts? (c) What are the associations between pigment use, type of deposition, and sex and age-at-death of the deceased? (d) Is there a chronological variability in the association between architectural use of colourants and mortuary patterns?

Results

Variability in pigment use at Çatalhöyük

The most frequent pigment encountered at Çatalhöyük is red ochre, known as haematite or iron oxide (Fe2O3). It present in different depositional contexts across the site including burials and as part of architectural decoration of walls and installations within houses, but also on figurines, clay balls and surviving wooden posts32,84,85,86,87,88,89. Less common pigments include yellow ochre, cinnabar, blue azurite and green malachite. Yellow ochre, or goethite (FeO(OH)), was found in certain wall paintings from the earlier occupation levels and in some burials81. Cinnabar (HgS) or vermilion, a scarlet red form of mercury, was mainly found on human remains, shells and occasionally mixed with ochre for wall paintings81,85 (see Supplementary Fig. S1). Malachite (Cu2CO3(OH)2) and azurite (Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2) were uniquely present as burial associations81,85,90. The latter came from at least two different sources. The dark blue variant contained arsenic, antimony, lead and zinc derived from an arsenic rich geology, as observed in the area around Niğde, close to the Black Sea, or in the Kutahya region of western Anatolia. These elements were not present in the light blue version of azurite85 (see Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3).

Funerary pigment use

11% of all primary and secondary depositions (62 out of 567) shows evidence of pigment inclusion, either directly on the skeletal remains or indirectly as burial association (henceforth defined as movable items associated with the grave and the deposited individual, regardless of intent91) (Table 1).

Table 1 List of Çatalhöyük primary and secondary human remains with pigments classified as (a) skeletons with direct pigment traces and (b) individuals with burial associations that contained pigment.

Traces of pigment found directly on skeletal remains are always red in colour, consisting of either ochre or cinnabar. Pigment was present on 36 individuals (6.3% of all primary and secondary depositions) (Table 1). Of these, 33 (92%) were primary depositions and three (8%) were secondary depositions (Fig. 1a). There were more males (39%) with direct pigment traces than females (13%) (Fig. 1b). The proportion of skeletons receiving direct pigment treatment is slightly smaller for younger individuals (44%) than for adults (56%) (Fig. 1c). Some 67% of the skeletons with direct pigment traces show evidence of some sort of funerary containment based on the presence of phytoliths, in the form of rope, matting or basketry.

Figure 1
figure 1

Distribution of Çatalhöyük human remains with direct pigment traces by (a) deposition category, (b) sex and (c) age-at-death. Charts generated with Microsoft Office Excel 2016 (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/excel).

The majority of individuals with direct pigment traces display pigment on the cranium (n = 30; 83%). Of these, 18 are adults and 12 are subadults. Among these cases, sex was determined for 17 individuals (12 males and 5 females). The 30 individuals with pigment on the cranium were further separated into those with pigment exclusively on the cranium and those who displayed pigment staining on both cranial and infracranial elements. The occurrence of these two forms of pigment applications differ significantly between adults and subadults (p = 0.011) with the application of pigment exclusively on the cranium being more frequent in subadults.

With regard to the anatomical distribution of different types of pigments, iron oxide is observed on the cranium and/or on the infracranial skeleton. In contrast, cinnabar only occurs on the cranium of 14 individuals (2.5% of the total sample or 39% of the skeletons with direct pigment traces), mostly from primary contexts (13 out of 14), including both subadults (n = 7) and adults (n = 7), the latter of whom are mostly males (M = 5, M? = 1, F? = 1). The presence of cinnabar is restricted to the frontal and/or temporal bones of the cranial vault. In two individuals (skeleton 32818 and 22196) cinnabar staining takes the form of a stripe (Fig. 2a,b). In two other cases, phytoliths were found adhering to the cinnabar (skeletons 5177 and 22196) (Fig. 2c).

Figure 2
figure 2

Examples of funerary pigment use at Çatalhöyük. (a) In situ photograph from skeleton 32818 with cinnabar stripe and a shell with cinnabar deposited at the right shoulder (Photograph by J. Quinlan); (b) Detail of the cinnabar stripe (Photograph by M. Milella); (c) Microscopic image of the frontal bone of skeleton 22196 showing a cinnabar layer with unstained phytoliths on top (Photograph by E. Schotsmans); (d) Bone ‘applicator’ with lump of blue pigment recovered with skeleton 16308 (Photograph by J. Quinlan); (e) Unio shell ‘palette’ with cinnabar (22194.X6) (Photograph by R. Veropoulidou); (f) Individual 21884 was buried on its right side with the skeletal elements on the uppermost and left side of the skeleton more intensely stained with red pigment (Photograph by J. Quinlan); (g) Right patella of skeleton 21884 was more stained on its medial side (Photograph by E. Schotsmans); (h) The partial discolouration of the left femoral head confirms that individual 21884 was flexed and fleshed when the ochre was applied, leaving the main part of the femoral head unstained (Photography by E. Schotsmans). Figure generated with Adobe illustrator 23.0.6 (http://www.adobe.com/fr/products/illustrator.html).

Burial associations with pigments were present as red, blue or green pigment in 25 burials (4.6% of all primary and secondary depositions) from mainly primary depositions either as lumps or as stained objects (Fig. 3a, Table 1). The data show a relatively even distribution between adults (48%) and subadults (52%) (Fig. 3c) with more females (36%) than males (16%) having pigment as a burial association (Fig. 3b). Pigments were associated with six bone objects and present on eleven stained shells, on phytoliths, probably from matting, on two baskets, two wooden bowls, one schist palette and on two mirrors (Table 1). Blue and green pigments were associated only with adult females (n = 5) and subadults (n = 6).

Figure 3
figure 3

Distribution of Çatalhöyük human remains with pigments as burial association by (a) deposition category, (b) sex and (c) age-at-death. Charts generated with Microsoft Office Excel 2016 (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/excel).

Diachronically, the relative frequency of primary burials decreases over time while the proportions of secondary and tertiary depositions increase. This trend is most clearly visible in the secondary deposition category, being absent in the Early occupation period but becoming the largest category in the Final occupation period (Fig. 4a)77. Percentages of individuals with pigments from the Early, Middle, Late, and Final occupation periods amount to 39.7%, 10.4%, 4.6%, and 0%, respectively (Fig. 4b).

Figure 4
figure 4

(a) Diachronic distribution of the different depositional categories; (b) Number of individuals and relative percentages of individuals with direct pigment traces and with pigments as associated items by occupation period (n = number). Charts generated with Microsoft Office Excel 2016 (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/excel).

The frequency of the two studied pigment categories, those found as direct applications or as burial associations, changed significantly over time (p = 0.004). The occurrence of pigments in burials from the Early occupation period consisted almost entirely of directly applied colourants. In the Middle and Late periods the occurrences of pigments on human remains and as burial association became more even. An additional observation is that a combination of cinnabar on the cranium and ochre on the infracranial skeleton is observed only in the Early occupation period (n = 3). Two individuals had traces of applied pigment as well as a burial association (skeletons 4853 and 32818). Four subadults from the Middle (n = 3) and Late (n = 1) period were found with both red and blue/green pigments as burial association (Table 1).

Architectural use of colourants and its associations with burials

A total of 178 archaeological units with 323 painted layers (Fig. 5a) occurred on a variety of plaster-lined house interior features, such as walls (42.3%), platforms (24.7%), niches (6.6%), benches (6.6%), post/pillars (6.6%), floors (4.9%) and other (8.3%). With regard to painted designs, the vast majority of the studied architectural use of colourants was composed of monochromatic red layers (58.6%) (Fig. 5b), followed by a portion with motifs that could not be identified due to poor preservation or insufficient exposure (23.1%). Geometric motifs made up about 15% of the painting corpus (Fig. 5c), while hand motifs (2.1%) and combinations of geometric designs and hand motifs (0.6%) were less frequent.

Figure 5
figure 5

(a) Microscopic image of a multi-layered plaster from building 17, the consecutive marl layers are observable, separated by red pigment or by soot (Photograph by G. Busacca); (b) Example of a monochromatic red wall painting from building 59 (Photograph by J. Quinlan); (c) Example of a wall painting with geometric motif from building 80 (Photograph by J. Quinlan). Figure generated with Adobe illustrator 23.0.6 (http://www.adobe.com/fr/products/illustrator.html).

From a diachronic perspective, all investigated buildings from the Early and Middle occupation levels showed at least some evidence of architectural colourant use (62% and 71%, respectively), although substantial variability exists in the extent of elaboration. In contrast, in the Late occupation levels, a significantly lower proportion of buildings yielded evidence of paintings (32%) (p = 0.018).

The spatial distribution of colourant use within the houses also showed period-specific patterns92. During the Early period, they mainly appear clustered in the eastern and northeastern parts of the house. During the Middle occupation period, the vast majority of paintings were located where burials occurred in the ‘clean’ areas of houses (‘dirty’ areas being linked with hearths, ovens and cooking93), and associated with interior features such as white-plastered platforms, benches, plaster or bone embellished installations and intramural burials. In the Late period, architectural uses became less frequent and spread to all walls of the houses.

There is a wide range of variation in the number of buried individuals contained within the 66 studied buildings, ranging between 0 and 64. Among the buildings that do contain burials (54 out of 66), the proportion of burials that have pigments, either through direct application or as burial associations, also varies considerably (0–38%). Focussing on the more fully excavated buildings (i.e., at least 75% excavated; 23 buildings with a total of 398 buried individuals), 87% contain coloured wall layers (20 out of 23), and over 94% of the recovered individuals, buried either with or without pigments (37 and 339 cases respectively), originated from the buildings with painted wall layers. The remaining 22 buried individuals, which all show no sign of pigment use, were found in two buildings that do not contain any painted layers. Overall, across all the buildings, there is a correlation between the number of buried individuals without pigments and the number of buried individuals with pigments (z = 2.21, p = 0.02). This means that when the number of burials without pigment increases in a building, the number of burials with pigments tend to increase. In terms of the depositional context of the recovered burials, there is also a correlation between the number of primary burials (including those that were disturbed) and the number of tertiary depositions (z = 2.63, p = 0.009).

To understand the relationship between the number of buried individuals, irrespective of pigment presence, and the number of painted layers among the studied buildings, a generalised linear model (GLM) was built with a negative binomial error distribution (dispersion parameter = 0.94). The variance inflation factor of the two predictor variables is low (1.23 for both primary and tertiary depositions), suggesting that the model is not affected by collinearity. Figure 6a summarises the linear model and the modelled relationships. The results indicate that both primary and tertiary burial counts have a positive relationship with the number of painted layers. This suggests that the quantity of painted wall layers among the buildings is partly connected to the number of primary burials and partly to the number of tertiary depositions (Fig. 6b). Importantly, the relationships between these two variables in association with the number of painted layers are statistically independent from each other, meaning that the number of painted layers tends to increase when the number of either primary or tertiary burials increases. This finding implies that mortuary rites accompanying primary burials and tertiary depositions may have been separate, but both in association with the occurrence of painted layers. It should be noted that tertiary depositions were recovered from occupation as well as construction, modification and closure/abandonment layers, which might explain the weaker relationship between tertiary depositions and painted layers. This means that the association between architectural use of colourants and skeletal remains from tertiary contexts may be indirect, rather than directly associated with the occupation of the house alone, hence confirming that different mortuary rites might be in place for the later phases of the sequential funerary practices.

Figure 6
figure 6

(a) Summary of the linear model and the modelled relationships; (b) The relationship between primary (left panel)/tertiary (right panel) depositional contexts and the minimum number of painted wall layers. The black solid lines depict the modelled effect of primary and tertiary depositions on the painted layers; the grey area represents the 95% confidence interval of the mean predicted values. Table and graphs generated with R × 64 v4.1.0 (https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/old/4.1.0/) and combined in Adobe illustrator 23.0.6 (http://www.adobe.com/fr/products/illustrator.html).

Discussion

The results hint at substantial variability in mortuary treatment for certain members of the community. The inhabitants of Çatalhöyük practiced funerary differentiation which is clear when considering that only a small number of individuals were treated with pigments. Whereas the choice to use pigments or not, as part of funerary treatment, seems not to have been influenced by the sex and age of the deceased, the choice of specific pigments such as cinnabar, azurite and malachite, appears to be associated with aspects of the social identity of the deceased. First, application of cinnabar to the head appears to have been reserved mainly for males. Throughout history cinnabar was of special importance in many cultures for its bright red colour, resistance to fading over time and its hypnotic and sedative properties when heated94,95,96,97,98. The special value of cinnabar is also suggested for Çatalhöyük, where it was only present in a few burials and wall paintings81,92,99. Interestingly, the restricted presence of cinnabar to the frontal and temporal bones accompanied by phytoliths may suggest the once presence of a headband which might also have been worn during life85,100. Ethnic groups from Vanuatu consider headbands, regardless of colour, as valuable objects, only worn by men of high rank101,102, and in Neolithic and Bronze Age China cinnabar was exclusively linked to elite graves103. It is important to remain cautious with drawing such parallels, but the presence of cinnabar may suggest that these individuals had obtained a special status. Although a discussion of the type and transmission of social status at Neolithic Çatalhöyük is beyond the scope of this contribution, it is interesting to note that kinship studies in progress so far failed to show genetic relatedness between individuals bearing traces of cinnabar and between individuals buried in the same domestic structures104,105,106,107. This may suggest that in the Çatalhöyük community status was acquired rather than inherited. However, caution is required given the small sample size.

The second trend shown by the results is that blue and green burial associations were solely present in burials of females and subadults. Blue and green colours entered the burial record as early as the Late Natufian, from ca. 11,000 cal BC108,109. These colours have sometimes been associated with concepts of growth, fertility and ripeness, which are abstractions that could be related to the transition to agriculture108,109. In six cases at Çatalhöyük, green or blue pigment was associated with a bone object, interpreted as pigment applicators90,110 (Fig. 2d). The limited sample size precludes meaningful statistical comparisons for a more general interpretation, but this occurrence has significance for insight into practical aspects of application of colourants.

Evidence for pigment processing, pigment containers and application tools was found in the form of schist palettes, shell containers, a wooden bowl and animal bone applicators85,90,110,111,112. Fifteen shells (14 Unio sp. and 1 Ostrea edulis) out of a total of 29,395 shells (0.05%) recovered from various contexts at Çatalhöyük were categorised as ‘palettes’ or containers in which pigments had been mixed with a binder85,113,114. Eleven of those were recovered as burial associations (Table 1). The inner sides of these palettes showed traces of brush strokes in either cinnabar or ochre (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Table S5). Examination of the architectural use of colourants in combination with experimental studies have also shown that they were likely applied with (perishable) brushes onto dry plaster, after mixing the pigments with water32,81,83,92. Microchemical analyses of some of the paintings showed that the red paint consisted of a fine grained sediment of clay, calcite and haematite, together with embedded grains of red and colourless obsidian which may have had an effect on the optical properties of the artwork92,115.

When focussing on funerary evidence, only a few studies discuss the pigment application method. In a collective Natufian grave from Azraq, pigment was applied to crania as part of a secondary mortuary practices24. The Natufian site of Shubayqa in Jordan displayed child remains with ochre, suspected to have been stained from a burial container or wrapping34. In the Anatolian Early Neolithic preceramic sites of Körtik Tepe, Demirköy and Hasankeyf Höyük designs with lines were found on articulated elements40,41,42. These lines are suspected to have been transferred to the bones from painted matting or textiles as a result of soil pressure40,41, although it is also suggested that some bones may have been painted directly as part of a post-depositional treatment40. An early PPNB deposit at Dja’de el-Mughara revealed a subadult surrounded with phytoliths and red colourant, interpreted as a stained mat25,30. The results obtained in the present study on Neolithic Çatalhöyük show a significant difference in pigment application between adults and subadults with pigment exclusively on the cranium being more frequent in subadults. This may suggest that pigment was manually applied to the head of younger individuals, while adults could have been stained on the cranium and infracranial skeleton from exposure to matting or from sprinkling colourant. This possibility should be studied in more detail. In four cases ochre appeared to be more concentrated on one side of the skeleton (skeletons 21884, 22522, 32645, 32437), observations that were also reported at Körtik Tepe40. Skeleton 21884 showed clear indications that staining occurred on the uppermost side of the skeleton in the grave (Fig. 2f–h). This shows that ochre was applied to the left side of the deceased after being placed in the grave on the right side. The partial staining of the left femoral head confirms that the skeleton had been flexed and fleshed when the ochre was applied, leaving a large part of the femoral head unstained, being protected by the acetabulum and associated soft tissues (Fig. 2h). The abundant presence of phytoliths in this burial confirms the use of matting, although the archaeological evidence makes it difficult to reconstruct if the mat had been placed on top or around the body. Therefore, it is difficult to conclude if the matting was painted with ochre or if ochre was sprinkled on top of the deceased, before being wrapped in matting. However, there is a likely association between pigments and the use of some form of wrapping or covering, either as matting or basketry. Analysis of the entire dataset of all primary, primary disturbed and secondary burials indicates that phytoliths were observed in just over 5% of burials90, while 67% of the sub-sample of skeletons with direct pigment traces showed evidence of some sort of wrapping or covering.

The presence phytoliths in combination with the presence of cinnabar on the frontal and temporal bones of crania, indicates that a headband could have been worn. However, it remains unclear if the deceased wore a headband stained with cinnabar, or a headband over a stripe of cinnabar applied to the skin. The fact that the observed phytoliths were unstained (Fig. 2c), does not necessarily exclude one of these options85. With regard to the timing of application, the stripes have most often been observed on individuals from primary depositions, which suggests that cinnabar was put on a fleshed head and not on dry skeletal remains. Over the years, both soft tissue of the deceased and organic matter of the headband degraded, leaving a coloured stripe on the cranium (Fig. 2a,b).

An important result from the joint analysis of mortuary and architectural data is the association between primary and tertiary depositions, and number of painted layers in the buildings. These connections have been previously suggested68, but were not statistically tested to date. The combination of these data suggest the following selection process (Fig. 7): (1) While previous population estimates of the size of the Çatalhöyük community116 might be overestimated117, the skeletal assemblage is consistent with an attritional mortality profile77,78. Nevertheless, the deposition of some individuals outside the settlement cannot be excluded based on other Neolithic Near Eastern sites where it has been suggested that not all individuals were buried inside the settlement118,119,120. (2) The results from this study show that primary burials, regardless of pigment presence, tend to be accompanied by architectural paintings. Some community members were selected to be buried with pigments and/or associated items but the majority did not receive this special treatment77,79,90. (3) A final selection included individuals, either as complete bodies or disarticulated skeletal elements, who remained in the community as a result of delayed burial practices or by re-opening burials77,79,121. These circulating skeletal elements were eventually deposited in secondary or tertiary deposition contexts, which may also have been linked to the creation of architectural paintings.

Figure 7
figure 7

Hypothesised selection process. Deposition of some individuals outside the settlement cannot be completely excluded. The deceased, deposited inside the settlement, were selected to be buried with or without pigments and associated items. There was a tendency for these primary burials to be accompanied by architectural paintings. Other individuals, either as complete bodies or loose skeletal elements, remained in the community. These circulating skeletal elements were eventually deposited in secondary or tertiary deposition contexts, which may also have been linked to the creation of architectural paintings in an indirect way (dotted line), because not all tertiary depositions were associated with the occupation of the house only. Figure generated with Adobe illustrator 23.0.6 (http://www.adobe.com/fr/products/illustrator.html).

The selection process detailed in Fig. 7 might reflect a form of early social differentiation, as suggested before in the literature58,59. Sex and/or age-at-death alone did not influence selection for mortuary treatment77,121,122 and genetic relatedness did not play a major role either104,106,107. More research is necessary to understand which factors motivated the choices (e.g. vertical vs. horizontal social differentiation).

The results of this study also show that tertiary depositions might be more important than previously thought, irrespective of skeletal element involved. Only recently, the tertiary assemblage from Çatalhöyük received some attention77. The Near Eastern Epipalaeolithic and Neolithic literature mostly focuses on the circulation and secondary treatments of crania and entire skulls rather than other isolated infracranial elements in non-burial contexts36,59,121,123,124,125,126,127. The analysis of skeletal remains in less typical depositional locations deserves further consideration, as do reflections on dynamic mortuary sequences as opposed to graves as static features.

The results could be indicative of the construction of ‘social memory’, as has been argued for other Epipalaeolithic and Neolithic communities in the Near-East59,60,128,129,130,131,132. According to socio-cultural anthropologists, collective memory is handed down from generation to generation through repetition of past actions and by direct object-to-memory association133. Intramural burials may have been a part of processes of memory retention with each interment contributing to communal memory by keeping the deceased close to the daily rhythm of repeated household activities65. In Çatalhöyük the buildings show repetitive patterning and repetition of practical routines60,90,92,128. The creation of architectural uses of colourants associated with burial rites fits well in this scenario. The circulation and deposition of human remains can therefore be linked to object-to-memory association60,128.

It appears that forms of commemoration at Çatalhöyük changed over time. This is suggested by a change in the relative proportion of primary versus secondary/tertiary depositions, with an increase of secondary/tertiary depositions over time (Fig. 4a)77. In addition, the frequency of individuals deposited with pigments decreases from the earliest to the latest occupation periods (Fig. 4b). Similarly, there is a decline in architectural pigment use around 6500 cal BC, in combination with changes in spatial location and distribution. These results correspond with former suggestions that inhabitants from the Early levels of Çatalhöyük may have been held together by collective memory, while the community in the Late and Final periods was increasingly less dependent on cohesive ritual ties75. These changes, at least for the specific society under study, may also have been linked to a shift to different means of symbolic expression, as suggested by the parallel increase of other, more portable forms of visual culture such as pottery134 and stamp seals135. These patterns might also be linked to a greater emphasis on the concept of ownership which is associated with early farming136. The diachronic changes are consistent with and provide support for previous observations at Çatalhöyük regarding increased productivity, increased social autonomy of single households, and the shift towards a more dispersed settlement pattern, reduced ritual ties and dispersal of the population around 6500 cal BC73,75,76,137.

Conclusions

Human remains, pigments and architectural use of colourants from Neolithic Çatalhöyük provide new insights into pigment use by this community, by showing the internal dynamics of this particular society and contributing to the interpretation of mortuary practices in Neolithic Anatolia. The results reveal a correlation between the use of pigments in funerary and architectural contexts. They suggests that dynamic mortuary actions were integrated into a variety of social practices consisting of specific selection processes largely independent of sex and age-at-death of the deceased. This study also highlights the significance of tertiary depositions, in addition to those related to the practice of cranial retrieval. Future excavations, aDNA analyses, increased interdisciplinary research and (re)-examination of tertiary depositions may provide further information about early social complexity of this Neolithic farming community, its symbolism and ideology. Undoubtedly other colourful materials of an organic nature would also have been part of the colour palette, and the current data likely provide an incomplete glimpse of the actual frequency of practices employing colour at Çatalhöyük. In the future, a consistent and systematic analysis of all pigments based on the same recording system at a number of contemporary sites would be useful to permit inter-site, regional and interregional comparisons. This should increase considerations specifically focused on mortuary pigment use in Neolithic Anatolia and, ultimately, in the Neolithic Near East.

Materials and methods

Çatalhöyük deposition categories

In total, a minimum of 816 individuals were excavated from stratified Neolithic contexts during the Hodder excavations (1993–2017). Each burial was assigned to one of several deposition categories (primary undisturbed, primary disturbed, secondary, tertiary and unknown burials). A detailed description of each category is reported elsewhere77,78,122. In brief, primary undisturbed depositions include articulated skeletons not disturbed by subsequent Neolithic activity (n = 286). Primary disturbed depositions include articulated skeletons found in their original/initial location of burial but were disturbed by subsequent Neolithic activity (n = 185). Secondary burials are represented by disarticulated or partially articulated skeletons retrieved from a primary burial location and intentionally deposited in another during the Neolithic (n = 96). The category of tertiary depositions consists of isolated, disarticulated or partially articulated skeletal elements found outside typical burial contexts, in internal spaces (e.g. construction, occupation and abandonment layers) as well as external spaces (e.g. middens, open areas) (n = 174). Lastly, the unknown category includes skeletal remains for which the original deposition could not be determined due to disturbance (e.g. soil erosion, animal burrowing) (n = 75).

Biological profiles

Skeletal remains were studied using standard macroscopic biological anthropological methods. For adults, age-at-death was assessed using morphological changes of the auricular surface138 and pubic symphysis139. For non-adult individuals, age-at-death was estimated based on timing of epiphyseal fusion140, dental development and mineralisation141. The individuals were grouped in the following age cohorts: old adults (above 50 years of age-at-death), middle adults (35–49 years of age-at-death), young adults (20–34 years of age-at-death), adolescents (12–20 years of age-at-death), children (3–12 years of age-at-death), infants (between 2 months and 3 years of age-at-death), neonates (from birth to 2 months of age-at-death) and pre-term fetuses (prenates). Sex determination was carried out based on sexually-diagnostic morphological characteristics of the pelvis, cranium and mandible142,143,144,145. Individuals were categorised as female (F), possible female (F?), indeterminate (indet), possible male (M?), male (M) and too young to determine (i.e. < 18–20 years old) (tytd).

Pigments

All burials (primary and secondary) that showed presence of pigment were selected from the Çatalhöyük Project Database and the annual archive reports146. Each individual was further classified according to the relationship between pigments and skeletal remains in (1) skeletons with direct pigment traces and (2) individuals with burial associations that contained pigment (Table 1).

Intentionality was demonstrated based on analyses of reference sediment samples, relative location, size, shape and use wear analysis of the objects with pigment. Microscopic analyses have shown that yellow residues may have been misidentified as pigment while being botanical remains or discolouration of the sediment147. In addition, not all ‘yellow pigment’ appeared to have been sampled, so it could not be verified geochemically. Therefore, it was decided to exclude possible yellow ochre from the database.

Skeletal remains and associated items, documented to have pigments and when able to be traced in the archived collection, were analysed using portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF). The pigments were analysed using a portable SPECTRO xSORT X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (ED-XRF) from Ametek equipped with a silicon drift detector (SDD) and a low power W X-ray tube with an excitation source of 40 kV. Samples were positioned above a 7 mm diameter aperture and analysed over an acquisition time of 10 s. PXRF investigates only the elemental composition of samples. This means that characterisation of pigments was based on the presence of specific elements such as mercury (Hg) in cinnabar (HgS) (see Supplementary Fig. S1) and the presence of copper (Cu) in azurite (Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2) or malachite (Cu2CO3(OH)2) (see Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3). To confirm that these elements were not derived from the depositional environment, a reference sediment sample was analysed as a control (see Supplementary Figs. S1, S2, S3). The XRF results are presented in Supplementary Table S4.

Some pigments were exported to the Middle East Technical University (METU) for further analysis with X-ray Diffraction (XRD) (see Supplementary Table S4). Exports were limited to pigments from elaborate burials or unidentifiable pigments. XRD patterns were recorded on a Rigaku MiniFlex II X-ray diffractometer (wavelength of X-rays 0.154 nm Cu source, voltage 30 kV, filament emission 15 mA). Samples were scanned from 10 to 80° (2θ) using a 0.01° step width and a 1 s time count. The divergence slit was 0.3°. The powder patterns were converted to be evaluated using the DIFFRAC.EVA V3.1 software package.

Architectural pigment use

Most of the buildings excavated to date yielded evidence of some form of colourants on walls of other surfaces, although with a great variability32,81,82,83,92. For the architectural use of colourants, information was gathered based on searching the main excavation database, followed by direct examination of painted plaster sequences through in situ examination and cross-sectional sampling for laboratory analysis. Cross-sectional sampling was undertaken to investigate painting frequency and relative temporal location within multi-layered plaster sequences reflecting the lifespan of a building. An entire cross-sectional plaster sequence was considered as a unit. Within the archaeological unit, the plastering events as well as painted layers were counted, resulting in a data category called ‘minimum number of painted layers’ (Fig. 5a). The database contained details of the context of each instance of colourant-bearing plaster, the minimum number of painted layers within the plaster sequence, the state of exposure and preservation, and, if possible, the type of motif (e.g. monochromatic red (Fig. 5b), geometric (Fig. 5c) or hand motif), and additional observations.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative analyses were conducted to investigate relationships between pigment use and burial practices. All depositions examined in this study were recovered from stratified contexts within buildings where at least 15% of the spatial coverage was excavated148. This results in a sample of 66 buildings from the three main temporal groupings referred to as Early (n = 13), Middle (n = 31) and Late (n = 22) occupation periods. Due to the nature of the data, the analyses were carried out in two parts. First, the individual burials were examined to explore possible associations between pigment application and burial characteristics. In particular, the analysis focused on assessing if the occurrence of pigment staining on the cranium versus post-cranial elements varied by the age-at-death and sex of the individual. Here, either a Chi-Square Test or Fisher’s Exact Test was used depending on sample size. In order to maximize sample size and facilitate statistical comparison individuals were grouped in two categories only: adults (above 20 years age-at-death) and subadults (below 20 years age-at-death).

In the second part of the analysis on the association between the number of buried individuals and the number of painted layers in buildings, correlations between burial frequencies and the occurrence of painted layers were tested using Kendall’ Tau to accommodate the presence of outliers and the non-symmetrical data distribution commonly encountered among count data. Then, the association between burial frequency among different depositional categories (irrespective of the presence of pigment) and the occurrence of painted layers in buildings was explored by constructing a generalised linear model (GLM). Depending on model dispersion, either a Poisson or a negative binominal error distribution was used to accommodate the count data. The analysis was limited to buildings that were more fully excavated (≥ 75% excavated; n = 23) to minimise bias in the frequency of recovered burials due to insufficient excavation coverage. To construct the GLM, the number of painted layers in each building was set as the response variable, while the number of primary (undisturbed plus disturbed) and tertiary depositions were inputted as predictors. Both predictor variables were first transformed to achieve an approximately symmetrical distribution to fulfil the assumptions of linear modelling, then scaled and centred to facilitate the interpretation of the model coefficients. The model was checked for collinearity with variance inflation factor, over-/under-dispersion, and influential cases with Cook’s Distance and leverage. Secondary burials were excluded from the analysis due to their low numbers or absence in most of the 75% excavated buildings analysed here. For reasons of sample size, the tertiary deposition category included all internal contexts related to a specific building, including house construction, occupation, modification and closure/abandonment layers. The distribution of ≥ 75% excavated buildings by time period appeared uneven, with a bias toward the Middle occupation period (n = 15, which is 65% of buildings excavated ≥ 75%). For this reason, time period was not included in the GLM as a predictor variable, as its uneven data balance may have affected model stability.

All statistical comparisons were conducted using an alpha value of 0.05. All analyses are conducted using the R statistical software (R Core Team 2019). The R code in rMarkdown format and data required to reproduce the statistics and associated graphics in this study are provided as supplementary material (see Supplementary S6 and S7).

Statements

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. No human or animal experiments were carried out for this study. Neolithic skeletal remains were analysed with consent of the Turkish authorities under the permit from the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, General-Directorate of Cultural Heritage and Museums, provided to the Çatalhöyük Research Project under the direction of Prof. Ian Hodder. All experimental protocols were approved by the University of Bordeaux and the University of Wollongong.

References

  1. Henshilwood, C. S. & Marean, C. W. The origin of modern human behavior: Critique of the models and their test implications. Curr. Anthropol. 44, 627–652 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. d’Errico, F. The invisible frontier. A multiple species model for the origin of behavioral modernity. Evol. Anthropol. 12, 188–202 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martinon-Torres, M. et al. Earliest known human burial in Africa. Nature 593, 95–100 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks, A. S. et al. Long-distance stone transport and pigment use in the earliest Middle Stone Age. Science 360, 90–94 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henshilwood, C. S. et al. A 100,000-year-old ochre-processing workshop at Blombos Cave, South Africa. Science 334, 219–222 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobs, Z., Duller, G., Wintle, A. G. & Henshilwood, C. S. Extending the chronology of deposits at Blombos Cave, South Africa, back to 140 ka using optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz. J. Hum. Evol. 51, 255–273 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Watts, I. The pigments from Pinnacle Point Cave 13B, Western Cape, South Africa. J. Hum. Evol. 59, 392–411 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dayet, L., Le Bourdonnec, F.-X., Daniel, F., Porraz, G. & Texier, P. J. Ochre provenance and procurement strategies during the Middle Stone Age at Diepkloof rock shelter, South Africa. Archaeometry 58, 807–829 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosso, D. E., Pitarch Marti, A. & d’Errico, F. Middle Stone Age ochre processing and behavioural complexity in the Horn of Africa: Evidence from Porc-Epic Cave, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 11, e0164793 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hovers, E., Ilani, S., Bar-Yosef, O. & Vandermeersch, B. An early case of color symbolism: Ochre use by modern humans in Qafzeh cave. Curr. Anthropol. 44, 491–522 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bar-Yosef Mayer, D. E., Vandermeersch, B. & Bar-Yosef, O. Shells and ochre in Middle Paleolithic Qafzeh Cave, Israel: Indications for modern behavior. J. Human Evol. 56, 307–314 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. d’Errico, F., Salomon, H., Vignaud, C. & Stringer, C. Pigments from the Middle Palaeolithic levels of Es-Skhul (Mount Carmel, Israel). J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 3099–3110 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Trinkaus, E., Buzhilova, A. P., Mednikova, M. B. & Dobrovolskaya, M. V. The People of Sunghir. Burials, Bodies, and Behavior in the Earlier Upper Paleolithic (Oxford University Press, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. d'Errico, F. & Vanhaeren, M. in Death Rituals and Social Order in the Ancient World: Death Shall Have No Dominion (eds C. Renfrew, K.J. Boyd, & I. Morley) 54–61 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).

  15. Riel-Salvatore, J. & Gravel-Miguel, C. in The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial (eds S. Tarlow & L. Nilsson Stutz) 303–347 (Oxford University Press, 2013).

  16. Henry-Gambier, D. Comportement des populations d’Europe au Gravettien : Pratiques funéraires et interprétations. Paléo 20, 399–438 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kacki, S. et al. Complex mortuary dynamics in the Upper Paleolithic of the decorated Grotte de Cussac, France. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 14851–14856 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goring-Morris, N., Hovers, E. & Belfer-Cohen, A. in Transitions in Prehistory. Essays in honor of Ofer bar-Yosef (eds J.J. Shea & D.E. Lieberman) 185–252 (Oxbow, 2009).

  19. Bar-Yosef, O. in Beyond Art: Pleistocene Image and Symbol (eds M. Conkey, O. Soffer, D. Stratmann, & N.G. Jablonski) 161–187 (California Academy of Sciences, 1997).

  20. Sagona, A. G. & Zimansky, P. Ancient Turkey (Routledge, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Minzoni-Deroche, A., Menu, M. & Walter, P. The working of pigment during the Aurignacian period: Evidence from Üçagizli cave (Turkey). Antiquity 69, 153–158 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Valla, F. et al. in Quartenary of the Levant. Environments, climate change, and humans (eds Y. Enzel & O. Bar-Yosef) 295–302 (Cambridge University Press, 2017).

  23. Kuijt, I. Negotiating equality through ritual: A consideration of Late Natufian and Prepottery Neolithic A period Mortuary practices. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 15, 313–336 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bocquentin, F. & Garrard, A. Natufian collective burial practice and cranial pigmentation: A reconstruction from Azraq 18 (Jordan). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 10, 693–702 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dermech, S. L’utilisation des couleurs au Proche-Orient néolithique et chalcolitique (env. 12000 - 3000 av. J.-C.) PhD thesis, Université de Strasbourg (2018).

  26. Belfer-Cohen, A. The Natufian graveyard in Hayonim Cave. Paleorient 14, 297–308 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Coqueugniot, E. in Espace naturel, espace habité en Syrie du Nord (10e -2e millénaires av. J.-C.) Vol. 28 (eds M Fortin & O. Aurenche) 109–114 (Maison de l'Orient, 1998).

  28. Coqueugniot, E. in Premiers paysans du monde. Naissances des agricultures (ed J. Guilaine) 63–79 (Editions Errance, 2000).

  29. Stordeur, D., Brenet, M., Der Aprahamian, G. & Roux, J.-C. Les bâtiments communautaires de Jerf el Ahmar et Mureybet Horizon PPNA (Syrie). Paléorient 26, 29–44 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chamel, B. Bioanthropologie et pratiques funéraires des populations néolithiques du Proche-Orient : l'impact de la Néolithisation, Université Lumiere Lyon 2 (2014).

  31. Coqueugniot, E. in A history of Syria in one hundred sites (eds Y. Kanjou & A. Tsuneki) 51–53 (Archaeopress Publishing Ltd, 2016).

  32. Busacca, G. Painting Daily Life: Spatial Contexts, Temporalities and Experiences of Architectural Paintings at Çatalhöyük (Stanford University, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Goring-Morris, N. & Belfer-Cohen, A. in Lanscapes in Transition (eds B. Finlayson & G. Warren) 9–22 (Oxbow Books, 2010).

  34. Richter, T. et al. Ochre, ground stone, and wrapping the dead in the Late Epipalaeolithic (Natufian) Levant: Revealing the funreary practices at Shubayqa 1, Jordan. J. Field Archaeol. 44, 440–457 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baird, D. in A Compagnon to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East (ed D.T. Potts) 431–465 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2012).

  36. Bocquentin, F., Kodas, E. & Ortiz, A. Headless but still eloquent! Acephalous skeletons as witnesses of Pre-Pottery Neolithic North-South Levant connections and disconnections. Paléorient 42, 35–55 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Baird, D. et al. Juniper smoke, skulls and wolves’ tails. The Epipalaeolithic of the Anatolian plateau in its South-west Asian context; Insights from Pınarbaşı. Levant 45, 175–209 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Baysal, E. Epipalaeolithic marine shell bead at Pınarbaşı. Central Anatolia from an Eastern Mediterranean perspective. Anatolica 39, 261–276 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gresky, J., Haelm, J. & Clare, L. Modified human crania from Göbekli Tepe provide evidence for a new form of Neolithic skull cult. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700564 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Erdal, Y. S. Bone or flesh: Defleshing and post-depositional treatments at Körtik Tepe (Southeastern Anatolia, PPNA Period). Eur. J. Archaeol. 18, 4–32 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosenberg. in The Neolithic in Turkey. New excavations & new research. The Tigris Basin (eds M. Ozdogan, N. Başgelen, & P. Kuniholm) 79–87 (Archaeology and Art Publications, 2011).

  42. Miyake, Y., Maeda, O., Tanno, K., Hongo, H. & Gündem, C. Y. New excavations at Hasankeyf Höyük: A 10th millennium cal. BC site on the Upper Tigris, Southeast Anatolia. Neolithics 1, 1–5 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Özdogan, M. & Özdogan, A. in Light on top of the black hill. Studies presented to Halet Çambel (eds G. Arsebük, M.J. Mellink, & W. Schirmer) 581–601 (Ege Yayinlari, 1998).

  44. Erim-Özdogan, A. in The Neolithic in Turkey (eds M. Özdogan, N. Baslegen, & P. Kuniholm) 185–269 (Archaeology and art publications, 2011).

  45. Özbasaran, M. in The Neolithic in Turkey (eds N. Baslegen, M. Özdogan, & P.I. Kuniholm) 135–158 (Archaeology and Art Publications, 2012).

  46. Yelözer, S. & Özbasaran, M. in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Gender, Methodology and the Ancient Near East (eds K. De Graef, A. Garcia-Ventura, A. Goddeeris, & S. Svard) (Zaphon Publishing, In Press).

  47. Yelözer, S. & Sönmez, D. in Proceedings of the International Conference: From the Caucasus to the Arabian Peninsula. Domestic spaces in the Neolithic (eds C. Douché & F. Pichon) 169–206 (Routes de l'Orient, 2018).

  48. Özbasaran, M. in Arkeoloji ve Göstergebilim (eds Y. Ersoy, E. Koparal, G. Duru, & Z. Aktüre) 21–32 (Yayinlari, 2019).

  49. Özbasaran, M. The neolithic site of musular: Central Anatolia. Anatolica 26, 129–151 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Baird, D. The Boncuklu Project: The origins of sedentism, cultivation and herding in central Anatolia. Anat. Archaeol. 12, 13–16 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Baird, D. The Boncuklu Project: Investigating the beginnings of agriculture, sedentism and herding in central Anatolia. Anatolian Archaeol. 16, 11–12 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Baird, D., Fairbairn, A. & Martin, L. The animate house, the institutionalization of the household in Neolithic central Anatolia. World Archaeol. 49, 753–776 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Öztan, A. in The Neolithic in Turkey (eds M. Özdogan, N. Baslegen, & P. Kuniholm) (Archaeology and Art Publications, 2011).

  54. Özbek, M. Remodeled human skulls in Kösk Höyük (Neolithic age, Anatolia): A new appraisal in view of recent discoveries. J. Archaeol. Sci. 36, 379–386 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Özbek, M. Culte des cranes humains à Çayönü. Anatolica 25, 127–137 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Büyükkarakaya, A. M., Çakan, Y. G., Godon, M., Erdal, Y. S. & Bıçakçı, E. Handling dead bodies: Investigating the formation process of a collective burial from Neolithic Tepecik-Çiftlik, Central Anatolia (Turkey). J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 56, 101118 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kılınç, G. M. et al. The demographic development of the first farmers in Anatolia. Curr. Biol. 26, 2659–2666 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Rollefson, G. O. in Life in Neolithic farming communities: Social organizationm identity, and differentiation (ed I. Kuijt) 165–190 (Kluwer Academic, 2002).

  59. Kuijt, I. The regeneration of life. Neolithic structurs of symbolic remembering and forgetting. Curr. Anthropol. 49, 171–197 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Hodder, I. & Cessford, C. Daily practice and social memory. Am. Antiq. 69, 17–40 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Goring-Morris, A. N. in Life in Neolithic Farming Communities (ed I. Kuijt) 103–136 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002).

  62. Boivin, N. Life rhythms and floor sequence: Excavating time in rural Rajasthan and Neolithic Çatal Höyük. World Archaeol. 31, 367–388 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Boivin, N. & Owoc, M. A. Soils, Stones and Symbols. Cultural Perceptions of the Mineral World (UCL Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Morton, C. Remembering the house. Memory and materiality in Northern Botswana. J. Mater. Cult. 12, 157–179 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. McAnany, P. Practices of place-makingm ancestralizing, and re-animation within memory communities. Archaeol. Pap. Am. Anthropol. Assoc. 20, 136–142 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Carsten, J. & Hugh-Jones, S. (Cambridge University Press, 1995).

  67. Joyce, R. A. & Gillespie, S. D. (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000).

  68. Last, J. A design for life: Interpreting the Art of Çatalhöyük. J. Mater. Cult. 3, 355–378 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Last, J. in Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Themes from the 1995–1999 Seasons (ed I Hodder) (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2005).

  70. Hodder, I. in Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons (ed I Hodder) 1 (Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, 2013).

  71. Hodder, I. & Tsoraki, C. in Communities at Work. The Making of Çatalhöyük (eds I Hodder & C. Tsoraki) (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  72. Bayliss, A. et al. Getting to the bottom of it all: A Bayesian approach to dating the start of Çatalhöyük. J. World Prehist. 28, 1–26 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Marciniak, A. et al. Fragmenting times: Interpreting a Bayesian chronology for the Late Neolithic occupation of Çatalhöyük East, Turkey. Antiquity 89, 154–176 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Marciniak, A. in The matter of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons (ed I Hodder) (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  75. Hodder, I. Çatalhöyük: The leopard changes its spots. A summary of recent work. Anatolian Stud. 64, 1–22 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Marciniak, A. & Czerniak, L. Social transformations in the Late Neolithic and the Early Chalcolithic periods in Central Anatolia. Anatol. Stud. 57, 115–130 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Haddow, S. D. et al. in Peopling the landscape of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 Seasons Vol. 13 (ed I Hodder) 315–356 (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  78. Boz, B. & Hager, L. D. in Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons (ed I Hodder) 413–440 (Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2013).

  79. Haddow, S. D. et al. in Consciousness and Creativity at the Dawn of Settled Life: The Test-Case of Çatalhöyük (ed I Hodder) 250–272 (Cambridge University Press, 2020).

  80. Andrews, P., Molleson, T. I. & Boz, B. in Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–99 Seasons Vol. Çatalhöyük Research Project Series Volume 4 (ed I Hodder) 261–278 (British Institute of Archaeology, 2005).

  81. Çamurcuoğlu, D. S. The Wall Paintings of Çatalhöyük (Turkey): Materials, Technologies and Artists. PhD Thesis thesis, University College London, (2015).

  82. Czeszewska, A. in Integrating Çatalhöyük: Themes from the 2000–2008 Seasons (ed I Hodder) 185–196 (Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2014).

  83. St. George, I. in Last House on the Hill: BACH Area Reports from Çatalhöyük, Turkey (eds R. Tringham & M Stevanović) 473–480 (Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2012).

  84. Kabukcu, C. & Asouti, E. in Çatalhöyük 2014 archive report 143–144 (2014).

  85. Schotsmans, E. M. J. et al. in Communities at Work: The Making of Çatalhöyük (eds I Hodder & C. Tsoraki) 263–288 (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  86. Bennison-Chapman, L. E. in The matter of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons (ed I Hodder) (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  87. Matthews, A. in Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–99 seasons Vol. 355–388 (ed I Hodder) (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2005).

  88. Matthews, W. et al. in Substantive technologies at Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2000–2008 seasons Vol. 9 (ed I Hodder) 115–136 (British Institute, 2013).

  89. Anderson, E., Almond, M. J., Matthews, W., Cinque, G. & Frogley, M. D. Analysis of red pigments from the Neolithic sites of Çatalhöyük in Turkey and Sheikh-e Abad in Iran. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 131, 373–383 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Vasić, B., Knüsel, C. J. & Haddow, S. D. in Peopling the Landscape of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 Seasons (ed I Hodder) 357–394 (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  91. Knüsel, C. J., Gerdau-Radonić, K. & Schotsmans, E.M.J. in The Routledge Handbook of Archaeothanatology (eds C.J. Knüsel & Schotsmans E.M.J.) 653–686 (Routledge, 2022).

  92. Busacca, G. in The Matter of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons (ed I Hodder) (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  93. Tung, B. Making Place, Doing Tradition: Exploring Intimate Knowledge at Neolithic Çatalhöyük (University of California, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Nöller, R. Cinnabar reviewed: Characterisation of the red pigment and its reactions. Stud. Conserv. 60, 79–87 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Martin-Gil, J., Martin-Gil, F. J., Delibes-de-Castro, G., Zapatero-Magdaleno, P. & Sarabia-Herrero, F. J. The first known use of vermillion. Experientia 51, 759–761 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Ho, B. S. J., Lin, J.-L., Huang, C.-C., Tsai, Y.-H. & Lin, M.-C. Mercury Vapor Inhalation from Chinese Red (Cinnabar). J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 42, 75–78 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Liu, J., Shi, J.-Z., Yu, L.-M., Goyer, R. A. & Waalkes, M. P. Mercury in traditional medicines: Is cinnabar toxicologically similar to common mercurials?. Exp. Biol. Med. 233, 810–817 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Bahar, H. Mining in Anatolia in ancient age mercury in Konya Region. Int. J. Res. Human. Soc. Stud. 5, 25–29 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Doherty, C. Living with Clay: Materials, Technology, Resources and Landscape at Çatalhöyük PhD thesis, University of Leicester, (2017).

  100. Schotsmans, E. M. J. et al. Pigment use in Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Near Eastern Archaeol. 83, 156–167 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Speiser, F. Ethnology of Vanuatu. An early twentieth century study (Crawford House Publishing, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Aufderheide, A. C. Overmodeled Skulls (Feline Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Liu, L. The Chinese Neolithic. Trajectories to Early States (Cambridge University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Yaka, R. et al. Variable kinship patterns in Neolithic Anatolia revealed by ancient genomes. Curr. Biol. 31, 1–14 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Yaka, R. et al. in Peopling the landscape of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons (ed I Hodder) 395–406 (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  106. Pilloud, M. A. & Larsen, C. S. “Official” and “practical” kin: Inferring social and community structure from dental phenotype at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 145, 519–530 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Chyleński, M. et al. Ancient mitochondrial genomes reveal the absence of maternal kinship in the burials of Çatalhöyük people and their genetic affinities. Genes 10, 207 (2019).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Bar-Yosef Mayer, D. E. in The value of colour. Material and economic aspects in the ancient world (eds S. Thavapalan & D.A. Warburton) 69–98 (Topoi, 2019).

  109. Bar-Yosef Mayer, D. E. Green stone beads at the dawn of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 8548–8551 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Russell, N. Anatolian bone tools. Anschnitt 31, 125–134 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Tsoraki, C. in Stone Tools in Anatolian Archaeology (ed A. Baysal) (Ege Yayınları Publications, Forthcoming a).

  112. Tsoraki, C. in The matter Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 Seasons (ed I Hodder) (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  113. Veropoulidou, R. in Peopling the landscape of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons (ed I Hodder) 47–72 (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  114. Veropoulidou, R. in The matter of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons (ed I Hodder) (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  115. Anderson, E., Almond, M. J. & Matthews, W. Analysis of wall plasters and natural sediments from the Neolithic town of Çatalhöyük (Turkey) by a range of analytical techniques. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 133, 326–334 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Cessford, C. in Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: Reports From the 1995–1999 Seasons (ed I Hodder) 323–328 (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2005).

  117. Bernardini, W. & Schachner, G. Comparing Near Eastern Neolithic megasites and southwestern pueblos: Population size, exceptionalism and historical trajectories. Camb. Archaeol. J. 28, 647–663 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Banning, E. B. The Neolithic period: Triumphs of architecture, agriculture and art. Near Eastern Archaeol. 61, 188–237 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Rollefson, G. O. in The archaeology of Jordan (eds B. MacDonald, R. Adams, & P. Bienkowski) 67–105 (Academic Press, 2001).

  120. Goring-Morris, A. N. in Archaeological perspectives on the transmission and transformation of culture in the Eastern Mediterranean (ed J. Clark) 89–105 (Oxbow, 2005).

  121. Haddow, S. D. & Knüsel, C. Skull retrieval and secondary burial practices in the Neolithic Near East: Recent insights from Catalhöyük, Turkey. Bioarchaeol. Int. 1–2, 52–71 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Knüsel, C. J. et al. in Peopling the landscape of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 Seasons (ed I Hodder) 315–356 (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

  123. Bonogofsky, M. A bioarchaeological study of plastered skulls from Anatolia: New discoveries and interpretations. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 15, 124–135 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Bonogofsky, M. Cranial modeling and Neolithic bone modification at ’Ain Ghazal: New Interpretations. Paléorient 27, 141–146 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Bocquentin, F. Après la mort, avant l’oubli. Les crânes surmodelés du Levant sud. Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie 132, 54–59 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Slon, V., Sarig, R., Hershkovitz, I., Khalaily, H. & Milevski, I. The plastereds skulls from the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B site of Yiftahel (Israel): A computed tomography-based analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e89242 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Verhoeven, M. Ritual and ideology in the Pre-Pottery neolithic B of the Levant and Southeast Anatolia. Camb. Archaeol. J. 12, 233–258 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  128. Hodder, I. in Religion, history, and place in the origin of settled life (ed I Hodder) 3–32 (University Press of Colorado, 2018).

  129. Goldgeier, H., Munro, N. D. & Grosman, L. Remembering a sacrad place - The depositional history of Hiazon Tachtit, a Natufian burial cave. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 56, 101111 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Tsoraki, C. in Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life Vol. 238–262 (ed I Hodder) (University Press of Colorado, 2018).

  131. Cauvin, J. Naissance des divinités. Naissance de l’agriculture: la révolution des symboles au Néolithique (Edition du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  132. Kuijt, I. in Magic practices and ritual in the Near Eastern Neolithic (eds H.G.K. Gebel, B. Dahl Hermansen, & C. Hoffman Jensen) 81–90 (Ex Oriente, 2002).

  133. Assmann, J. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination (Cambridge University Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Yalman, N., Tarkan, D. & Gültekin, H. in Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons (ed I Hodder) 147–182 (British Institute at Ankara, 2013).

  135. Türkcan, A. U. in Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons (ed I Hodder) 235–247 (London, 2013).

  136. Bowles, S. & Choi, J.-K. Coevolution of farming and private property during the early Holocene. Proc. Am. Acad. For. Sci. 110, 8830–8835 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Düring, B. S. & Marciniak, A. Households and communities in the central Anatolian Neolithic. Archaeol. Dial. 12, 165–187 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Lovejoy, C., Meindl, R., Pryzbeck, T. & Mensforth, R. Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: A new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 68, 15–28 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Brooks, S. & Suchey, J. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum. Evol. 3, 227–238 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Scheuer, L. & Black, S. Developmental Juvenile Osteology (Academic Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  141. Moorrees, C. F. A., Fanning, E. A. & Hunt, E. E. Variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J. Dent. Res. 42, 1490–1502 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Phenice, T. W. A newly developed visual method of sexing of the os pubis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 30, 297–302 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Ascadi, G. & Nemeskeri, J. History of Human Lifespan and Mortality (Akademiai Kiado, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  144. Ferembach, D., Schwidetzky, I. & Stloukal, M. Recommendations for age and sex diagnoses of skeletons. J. Hum. Evol. 9, 517–549 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Buikstra, J. E. & Ubelaker, D. H. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains, Research Seminar Series 44 (Arkansas Archaeological Survey, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  146. Çatalhöyük Archive Reports. http://www.catalhoyuk.com/research/archive_reports.

  147. Shillito, L.-M. et al. in Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons (ed I Hodder) 77–80 (Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2013).

  148. Hodder, I. in Peopling the landscape of Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 2009–2017 seasons (ed I Hodder) 1–30 (British Institute at Ankara, 2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Human Remains team and all other members of the Çatalhöyük Research Project for their work during 25 years of excavations and data collection at Çatalhöyük. Many thanks to Ian Hodder for the opportunity to work at Çatalhöyük and the interesting discussions. A special thanks goes to Lisa Guerre, Ceren Kabukcu, Christina Tsoraki and Jason Quinlan for their help and advice with this pigment project. Thanks to Marco Madella for his reflections on cinnabar and phytoliths, and to Ayça Küçükakdağ Doğu and Damla Kaptan for their input regarding genetic relatedness of individuals. We are indebted to Bilge Küçükdoğan for her continuous help with official administrative matters and Turkish language. We would like to thank Néhémie Strupler and Solange Rigaud for the organisation of the Moving Bodies workshop at the French Institute for Anatolian Studies, and to the audience of this workshop for their reflections and feedback on this study. We are grateful to Ian Hodder for comments on a draft of this paper. Thanks to Gauthier Devilder for his help with Figure 7. This project has received funding from IdEx Bordeaux, the Grand Programme de Recherche ‘Human Past’ and the France-Stanford Center for Interdisciplinary Studies. The European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme supported Schotsmans (Grant Agreement 794891) and Haddow (Grant Agreement 837781). Lin was funded by the Australian Research Council DECRA fellowship (DE200100502). Somel was supported by a European Research Council Consolidator Grant (772390) and Knüsel was funded by the French State under the ‘Investments for the future’ programme IdEx Bordeaux (ANR-10-IDEX-03-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.M.J.S. and G.B. conceived and designed the study with contributions of M.M., S.C.L. and C.J.K. Data collection was a team effort. Pigment related data were collected by E.M.J.S., G.B., M.V., A.M.L., R.V., F.T.K., M.M. Human remains related data were obtained by E.M.J.S., M.V., B.T., S.D.H., M.S., C.J.K. and M.M. Architectural data were collected by G.B., A.M.L. and C.M. Data analysis and interpretation was carried out by E.M.J.S., G.B., S.C.L., M.V. and M.M. E.M.J.S. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. J. Schotsmans.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schotsmans, E.M.J., Busacca, G., Lin, S.C. et al. New insights on commemoration of the dead through mortuary and architectural use of pigments at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Sci Rep 12, 4055 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07284-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07284-3

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing