Abstract
The incidence of death caused by cancer has been increasing worldwide. The growth of cancer cells is not the main problem. The majority of deaths are due to invasion and metastasis, where cancer cells actively spread from primary tumors. Our inbred rat model of spontaneous metastasis revealed dynamic phenotype changes in vitro correlating with the metastatic potential in vivo and led to a discovery of a metastasis suppressor, protein 4.1B, which affects their 2D motility on flat substrates. Subsequently, others confirmed 4.1B as metastasis suppressor using knock-out mice and patient data suggesting mechanism involving apoptosis. There is evidence that 2D motility may be differentially controlled to the 3D situation. Here we show that 4.1B affects cell motility in an invasion assay similarly to the 2D system, further supporting our original hypothesis that the role of 4.1B as metastasis suppressor is primarily mediated by its effect on motility. This is encouraging for the validity of the 2D analysis, and we propose Quantitative Phase Imaging with incoherent light source for rapid and accurate testing of cancer cell motility and growth to be of interest for personalized cancer treatment as illustrated in experiments measuring responses of human adenocarcinoma cells to selected chemotherapeutic drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cancer poses a major threat to public health worldwide, and incidence rates have increased in most countries since 19901. Cancer in Europe has also been a major burden, with 3.45 million new cases and 1.75 million deaths in 20122. Different types of cancers have not changed their incidence evenly across geographic regions. For example, the incidence of four common cancers in eastern and central European countries (prostate, postmenopausal breast, corpus uteri, and colorectum) started to approach levels in northern and western Europe, where rates were already high3. Aggressive cancers increase their incidence generally more dramatically. For example, oropharyngeal cancer significantly increased the incidence from 1983 to 2002 predominantly in economically developed countries4. The reasons for this unfavorable situation lie in the limited availability of treatments, inaccuracy of diagnosis, and difficulties with the choice of the most effective treatment. Further research and development in this direction are highly desirable. The growth of cancer cells is not the main problem in aggressive cancers; the majority of deaths are due to invasion and metastasis.
Metastases form by spreading cancer cells from primary tumors to distant parts of the organism. The process, referred to as the metastatic cascade, involves changes in cell morphology and, most importantly, active cell motility with underlying changes in gene expression. The changes are complex since they can be specific for not only different types of cancers relating to the original cancer transformation but also for different groups of patients relating to their genetic background, requiring a personalized approach to the treatment. This situation is difficult to tackle with effective biomedical research.
The introduction section overviews previous findings related to cancer metastasis, which were revealed largely by quantitative imaging of cell behavior leading to the results which focus on the novel application of an invasion assay. Quantitative Phase Imaging has been successfully utilized in a growing number of studies and has been proven as a powerful tool5,6. We have finally also used this technology to quantify the motile responses of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs.
Sarcoma model
Our approach has been in using a model with inbred rats LEWIS, which provides a constant genetic background. The model originates from a spontaneously transformed sarcoma K2. The K2 sarcoma cell population spontaneously progressed to a metastatic phenotype producing T15 cell population (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Video S1 online). A further progression resulted in a more-metastatic cell population A297. This concept, with the constant genetic background of the host and one original cancer transformation, is giving us a chance to address the specific mechanisms of the progression to the metastatic phenotype in this model system.
In vivo
The use of the inbred rat model provides not only the constant genetic background but also a possibility for testing the metastatic potential in vivo. Subcutaneous inoculation of 106 sarcoma cells in suspension gave rise to primary tumors in each animal with all 3 sarcoma populations (K2, T15, and A297). The rats were sacrificed several weeks later, and internal organs were examined for metastasis7. None of the 20 rats inoculated with K2 cells had metastasis. With T15 and A297 cells, we detected lung metastasis in 38% of 24 and 90% of 10 rats, respectively. In both populations, T15 and A297, the incidence was increased significantly (χ2 P < 0.01) in comparison to the K2 cells.
Morphology
The established model with the set of related sarcoma populations with different and verified metastatic potential allows following investigation of their in vitro phenotype. Cells in tissue culture were fixed and stained for F-actin with rhodamine-phalloidin. Cells for the K2 population were flat with conspicuous actin stress fibers and limited peripheral activity, while cells from the T15 and A297 populations lost their stress fibers and showed an active periphery (Fig. 1b,c). The decrease of the incidence of cells with F-actin stress fibers in T15 and A297 populations in comparison to the K2 population was statistically significant7.
Motility and chemotaxis
Our main interest was in the dynamic phenotype of the live cells. To investigate not only the speed of cell motility but also their directional migration—chemotaxis, we decided to use the Dunn direct viewing chemotaxis chamber (Weber Scientific)8,9. We chose a gradient formed by the introduction of the mixture of PDGF (Platelet Derived Growth Factor) and IGF (Insulin-like Growth Factor) to simulate the situation in the primary tumor, where these gradients would guide the metastatic cells into the bloodstream. Before time-lapse recording in chemotactic gradients, cells were starved in 0.5% serum for 3 h. Overnight time-lapse recording with lapse interval of 5 min used phase-contrast microscopy7. The cells were interactively tracked using Kinetic Imaging software, and displacements were analyzed in Mathematica (Wolfram). The 5-min displacements between frames were multiplied by 12 to get the speed in µm h−1. K2 cells achieved mean speed ± SEM of 11.1 ± 0.5 µm h−1 (N = 171). In comparison to the K2 cells, the T15 and A297 cells had significantly increased speed ± SEM of 17.0 ± 0.7 (N = 116, ANOVA P < 0.05) and 19.0 ± 0.9 (N = 176, ANOVA P < 0.01), respectively. In conclusion, the cells from populations with significantly increased metastatic potential lacking F-actin stress fibers also migrated with significantly increased speed. In order to evaluate chemotaxis, the directional movement of cells, we used statistics of directional data10. Therefore, we needed to convert the trajectories into directions, and we achieved that by determining the directions of cells on reaching a 70 µm horizon distance from the starting points of their trajectories. Only a subset of the cells reached the horizon (61 of 171 K2 cells, 81 of 116 T15 cells, and 86 of 176 A297 cells), and that is a fair system since chemotaxis is not defined for cells, which are not motile. The Rayleigh test revealed significant unimodal clustering (P < 0.01) of directions only in the cells from the metastatic lines, T15 and A297. We concluded that the T15 and A297 cells showed chemotaxis since the mean direction coincided with the direction of the increasing concentration of PDGF/IGF in the gradient. More precisely, the direction of the gradient was within the 95% confidence interval of the mean directions. The statistics of directional data does not provide means for testing differences between populations. Therefore we used ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) with unbalanced data and hierarchical model11 for displacement components in the direction of the gradient and found that only the A297 cells showed significantly stronger chemotaxis than the K2 cells (P < 0.05).
Rapid actin transport
The actomyosin machinery is instrumental in the motile responses of cells. To explore actin dynamics in the T15 cells, we developed a method of FLAP (Fluorescence Localization After Photobleaching) and showed that actin monomer was actively transported into the protrusion areas in the rapidly moving T15 cells from the metastatic population (see Supplementary Fig. S2 online). This active transport is mediated by myosin since it is abrogated by myosin light chain kinase inhibitor ML7. Therefore, we concluded that the active transport is a result of the contractile forces in the T15 cells12.
Invasion assay
At the target place in the metastatic cascade mediated by the hematogenous pathway, the cancer cells have to extravasate from the bloodstream into the surrounding tissue crossing the blood vessel wall. The inner surface of the blood vessel is formed by a layer of endothelial cells. We decided to investigate this step in vitro using monolayers of rat brain endothelial cells (RBE4), observing the details of the invasion of the sarcoma cells13. We never observed the non-metastatic K2 cells crossing the monolayer while the T15 cells invaded the monolayer readily. The invasion assay was developed to allow observation under flow conditions, which is the case in a real blood vessel situation. We found that the flow condition initially enhanced the invasion of the T15 cells after they adhered to the endothelial monolayer. In the experiments, without any flow, the invasion became faster only at a later time in the experiment. We hypothesized that the mechanical stimuli of the flow activate the invasion initially when the cell contractile forces are dominant. While later, the more efficient invasion without flow is dominated by the release of proteolytic enzymes, which is not effective under the flow conditions.
Gene expression and metastasis suppressor 4.1B
Once we characterized the populations from the sarcoma model and established the in vitro phenotype correlating with their metastatic potential in vivo, we were ready to examine their underlying gene expression profiles. We used Affymetrix Rat 230A GeneChips with 15,924 probes testing for 10,972 genes, which is a substantial subset of the total ~ 25,000 genes in rats7. Due to the straightforward availability of the inbred rats, we decided to use cells from the primary tumors as well as cells from tissue culture. The aim was in revealing not only the differences associated with the tumor progression towards the metastatic phenotype but also the differences between the in vivo and in vitro situations. The choice of the primary tumor rather than metastasis as the source of the in vivo material might be seen surprising since in experiments based on repeated intravenous injections of cells from metastases produced more efficient formation of new metastases14. With the intravenous injections, however, the selection procedure focuses only on the part of the metastatic cascade—extravasation and homing. In our experiments, when we passaged cells directly from one animal to another and found that subcutaneously introduced fragments from primary tumors gave rise to more metastasis than fragments taken from metastases. A plausible explanation is that the complete metastatic cascade, tested by spontaneous metastasis shed from primary tumors, is a much more complex process involving subsequent switches from proliferation to migration and back again. This switching machinery is fragile and is not readily preserved after it has been used and the cells in the primary tumor are better prepared for the formation of metastases.
The expression results are summarized in Supplementary Fig. S3, presenting previously unpublished heatmaps of relative expressions calculated from normalized expression levels. The genes in the heatmap were arranged using cluster analysis. The dominance of the blue color representing downregulation of gene expression shows that the progression towards the metastatic phenotype is linked to further dedifferentiation. It is also noticeable that not all genes are regulated similarly in vitro and in vivo. This observation shows that results with established cell lines based on in vitro data only need to be taken with caution.
More reduced information is also in Supplementary Fig. S3, presenting only significant changes larger than 2.5 ×. The statistical significance was corrected by the Benjamini–Hochberg algorithm15 to avoid excess of false-positive calls. With these selection conditions, we reduced the ~ 11,000 tested genes to 23 and believe that it is largely due to the power of the inbred rat model with the related cell populations only changed in their metastatic potential. We propose that this list contains the drives of the phenotype changes in this case. We confirmed the results for 10 of the genes with RT-PCR, cloned 4 of them, and when we started to obtain interesting results with Epb41l3 gene coding for protein 4.1B, we fully focused on it and identified it as a novel metastasis suppressor.
The amount of the 4.1B protein in the K2 cells, in vivo and in vitro, is similar to proteins expressed at an average level in the cells. The levels of 4.1B in the T15 cells, as well as the A297 cells, are significantly reduced 37 × in both situations. We found that its experimental suppression by microinjection of Rat epb41l3 siRNA led to the disappearance of the F-actin stress fibers in K2 cells, which makes their morphology resemble the more metastatic phenotype. Only a rescue experiment provides unequivocal proof that the 4.1B downregulation is responsible for the disappearance of the stress fibers. We were not able to perform the rescue experiment in the fragile sarcoma cells since they would not survive 2 rounds of chemical transfection. But we were successful in HeLa cells. Human epb41l3 siRNA suppressed the F-actin stress fibers in the Hela cells significantly, and subsequent transfection with a resistant 4.1B construct returned the incidence of stress fibers to normal levels. This result demonstrates that the role of 4.1B protein is more general and also valid in human carcinoma cells.
Dynamic experiments with the Dunn chamber revealed that 4.1B affected motility and chemotaxis as well as morphology. Cells were seeded on diamond scratched coverslips for easy localization and microinjected with expression constructs or siRNA. With each microinjection, we coinjected the EGFP (Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein) expression construct to identify successfully injected cells by fluorescence. Supplementary Video S4 illustrates the procedure. The 4.1B siRNA in non-metastatic K2 cells significantly enhanced cell speed to about double the rate. Conversely, the exogenous expression of 4.1B in the metastatic T15 cells reduced speed to about half of the wild-type cells, and their chemotaxis was also abrogated.
Microscopy observations with the 4.1B-EGFP fusion protein expressed in K2 and HeLa cells revealed that the protein was localized in mature focal adhesions and enriched in membranes, as shown before. Taking all the evidence together, we produced a hypothesis about the mechanism of the role of 4.1B as a metastasis suppressor enhancing cell motility. The 4.1B protein stabilizes the focal adhesions and facilitates the anchorage of F-actin stress fibers in the focal adhesions. These relatively stable structures act as a brake to cell motility. In the metastatic cell populations, the 4.1B protein is eliminated, the stress fibers cannot be anchored in the focal adhesions and disappear. The cells are now more mobile and can turn more easily to orient themselves in the chemotactic gradients and navigate through the metastatic cascade.
Results
Role of 4.1B in the invasion
After we published the evidence for protein 4.1B acting as a metastasis suppressor7, the laboratory of Richard Hynes confirmed the findings using knock-out mice and patient data16. They proposed that the mechanism may be mediated by apoptosis. The migration in 2D is not always controlled similarly to the 3D situation17, although there are situations where it is controlled the same way, such as the dorsal closure in vivo and mink lung cells in 2D tissue culture where TGFβ1 induces increased motility and spreading in both situations18. Here we present experiments exploring the role of 4.1B in our invasion assay developed earlier13. The fragile sarcoma cells do not survive the chemical transfection required for these experiments. Therefore, we used non-small cell lung carcinoma cells A549 with pneumocytes type II, both of human origin.
Exogenous expression of 4.1B protein in the A549 cells significantly abrogated their invasion (Table 1, Fig. 2 and Supplementary Video S5). This further confirms the role of 4.1B as the metastasis suppressor affecting cell motility. Control transfection with an empty vector achieved 21% of invading cells, and with 4.1B the fraction was reduced to only 3%. Suppression of the residual 4.1B by siRNA produced a moderately higher number of invading cells (26%), but the increase was not significant. This is not surprising because the A549 cells express only low 4.1B levels (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/experiments/E-GEOD-38332/Downloads) being a model of aggressive metastatic cancer.
Incoherent-light-source quantitative phase imaging (iQPI)
The invasion assay with the exogenous expression of the 4.1B protein confirmed similar results to the previous motility observations in 2D tissue culture. The presence of the protein suppressed the invasion in cancer-transformed cells as well as their 2D motility. It is therefore obvious that the 2D observations can provide useful information. In order to improve the quality of the 2D observations, we introduced the iQPI with a double-beam configuration. This arrangement provides accurate measurements of small details in cells since it does not suffer from coherence speckles and other artifacts as described by Chmelik19. Example imaging from this microscopy is illustrated in Fig. 3a and Supplementary Video S6. The image is calibrated for dry-mass density in pg µm−2 (pg, picogram, is 10−12 g) and presented as a 2D map.
The integrated signal inside a cell thus reveals the total dry-mass of the cell, and its growth (increase in dry-mass) can be evaluated as a function of time (Fig. 3b). Exponential interpolation of these growth curves gives dry-mass doubling time. The mean dry-mass of the cells ± SEM was 802 ± 110 pg and mean dry-mass doubling time ± SEM was 36.2 ± 11.7 h. In cells stably growing in tissue culture, the dry mass doubling time is equivalent to the cell cycle duration and can be determined much more rapidly.
The iQPI can measure accurately and rapidly not only the growth of cells but also their motility. In subconfluent cultures, it is feasible to evaluate translocations of centroids of the cell’s dry-mass and obtain accurate cell trajectories (Fig. 3c). The plot represents 14 cells with 7173 displacements achieving a mean speed ± SEM of 33.19 ± 2.00 µm h−1.
More confluent cultures, however, do not produce many accurate trajectories, but the iQPI can still produce a useful measure of cell motility in terms of protrusion and retraction20 illustrated in Fig. 4. All the cells in the movie achieved mean 1-min cell protrusion dry-mass ± SEM of 2.657 ± 0.808 pg covering mean 1-min cell protrusion area ± SEM of 71.28 ± 8.95 µm2. The mere increase in the size of protrusions is not sufficient for effective motility. The protrusion process in cells has to achieve asymmetry, which can be measured by dynamic polarity, defined as the distance between protrusion centroid and retraction centroid. The mean dynamic polarity ± SEM in this movie was 9.902 ± 0.620 µm.
Responses of A549 cells to chemotherapeutic drugs
The iQPI procedure was used to measure responses of A549 cells to selected chemotherapeutic drugs in order to demonstrate the potential of pretesting drugs with patient biopsy cells. Four drugs were used: an IGF1R inhibitor NVP-AEW541 (NVP), a PI3K inhibitor GDC0941 (GDC), a MEK inhibitor PD0325901 (PD), and another MEK inhibitor GSK1120212 (GSK). These drugs were previously used, and their specificity was tested by Julian Downward laboratory, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute21. Example images from a time-lapse recording with control medium (see Supplementary Video S7 online) are in Fig. 5a,b. Dry-mass increase of individual cells and cell clusters was significantly suppressed by GDC and less so by GSK (Fig. 5c,d, and Supplementary Video S8, S9). Speed of cell translocation was significantly reduced only by GDC, as illustrated by rose plots in Fig. 6a–d and the box and whisker plot in Fig. 6e. The speed suppression can be mediated by a reduction in of cell protrusion or dynamic polarity of protrusion/ retraction. In this case, the speed was suppressed mainly by a significant reduction of the dynamic cell polarity (ANOVA P < 0.03). The mean dynamic polarity ± S.E.M. of 17.2 ± 0.8 µm (N = 27 707) and 16.9 ± 1.2 (N = 27 135) was achieved by CNT cells, and GDC treated cells, respectively. There were no significant changes in total protrusion mass, but the maximum mass value in the protrusion area was significantly reduced by the GDC treatment from 85 ± 2 femtogram (femtogram is 10−15 g) for CNT cells to 69 ± 2 femtogram, ANOVA P < 0.05. Overview of all mean values ± S.E.M. and statistical data are in Supplementary Table S10 online. GDC was thus identified as the best drug from the set for the A549 cells, significantly reducing growth as well as the speed by reducing dynamic polarity and maximum mass density in the protrusion area. The GSK drug only partially reduced the growth with no effect on speed. The other two drugs NVP and PD did not achieve any significant changes in this test.
Discussion
The use of an inbred rat model with spontaneously transformed sarcoma cell populations at varying levels of tumor progression towards the metastatic phenotype allowed us to establish correlations between their metastatic potential in vivo and cell behavior in vitro. The cells from metastatic populations lost conspicuous F-actin stress fibers, increased speed of cell motility in 2D tissue culture, and showed significantly enhanced chemotaxis in gradients of PDGF/IGF. Fluorescence Localisation After Photobleaching showed that active transport of monomeric actin into the protrusion areas was instrumental in the fast motility of the sarcoma cells from the metastatic populations. In addition, the non-metastatic cells were not able to invade monolayers of endothelial cells while the metastatic cells invaded readily. Gene expression analysis identified protein 4.1B as a novel metastasis suppressor, which is lost in the metastatic cell populations. This loss induces the abrogation of F-actin stress fibers and is responsible for increased motility and chemotaxis of the cells from the metastatic populations.
It was previously known that the 4.1B protein is often downregulated in cancers and scientists found it surprising that 4.1B knock-out mice did not have an increased incidence of spontaneous cancers. After our 4.1B publication, Richard Hynes laboratory confirmed that the 4.1B is a metastasis suppressor and not a cancer suppressor by inducing cancers in the 4.1B knock-out mice and observed more invasion and metastasis. They also used patient data. It is therefore obvious that knock-out experiments on their own are limited in detecting subtle molecular mechanisms. The lack of the metastasis suppressor 4.1B manifests itself only in the progression towards the metastatic phenotype and can be efficiently identified by the fairly complex procedure presented in this manuscript. Subsequently, it is easier to confirm in another context, such as patient data, which tend to be more heterogeneous.
Here we show for the first time that the downregulation of the metastasis suppressor 4.1B is also responsible for invasion using experiments where transfected A549 cells invade monolayers of pneumocytes type II. The invasion test was first developed for the rat sarcoma cells invading more relevant rat endothelial monolayers, but we found that the human A549 carcinoma cells performed equally well with the epithelial pneumocytes, and we obtained meaningful results. These results further confirm our originally proposed hypothesis that the mechanism of the metastasis suppressor 4.1B is in its effect on cell motility and that our original 2D observations, including the localization of 4.1B in focal adhesions, were pointing in the correct direction.
Therefore, we started focusing on the use of iQPI, which is emerging label-free microscopy22, to obtain more accurate information on 2D motile processes rapidly, which is important particularly in metastasis research23. Similar approaches have been published. Vasilenko et al. used laser-based QPI to address the morphology of circulating tumor cells in relationship to their metastatic potential24. We were more interested in drug screening and Murray et al.25 and Mir et al.26 successfully used QPI exactly for that purpose but only evaluated cell growth. As our biological results indicate, our main interest was in the motility of cancer cells, and Frame et al.27 evaluated translocation of cancer cells using ptychography phase measurements, and Hellesvik et al.28 used the coherent laser-based Holomonitor system for 3D tracking of osteosarcoma cells.
With our biological model, including the metastasis suppressor, the presented results demonstrate a clear relationship between cancer cell behavior in vivo, in 3D and in 2D assays. This is a justification for using accurate double-beam iQPI for 2D analysis, and we demonstrate significant changes with drug responses based not only on translocation but on protrusion/ retraction measurements as well. These are of special importance in metastasis research since cells tend to form clusters, and translocation of individual cells cannot be measured as accurately under these circumstances.
Here we present data on the T1 sarcoma cells from the metastatic population. We also demonstrated the suitability of this approach for pretesting chemotherapeutic drugs by measuring responses of A549 cells to 4 selected treatments. One of the drugs, GDC, achieved the best performance in significant suppression of both, cell growth and motility. The measurements of growth rely on a dry-mass increase in cells, which can produce reliable results even if we do not encounter many divisions of cells, which are used in more traditional ways of evaluating cell growth. Cell translocation is measured very accurately, and even shorter observation times, such as 4 hours, would produce similar conclusions. The speed reduction can be mediated by changes in protrusion mass or dynamic polarity of protrusion/ retraction. In the case of the GDC drug, the speed of cell motility was decreased by reduced dynamic polarity, while the total mass of cell protrusion was not significantly changed. The only maximum value of mass in the protrusion area was reduced. This information is useful for potential further investigations of specific changes in cytoskeleton re-organization involved in the mechanism of the action of this drug.
The Horn design Leitz microscope has a fundamental setback since it is no longer commercially available. Moreover, it can only be used for one observation field at a time and does not combine with fluorescence. All these setbacks are resolved in a commercially available Q-Phase Microscope from Telight, which produces images comparable to the Horn design Leitz microscope since it is also a double-beam interference microscope with incoherent light source producing phase imaging which is free of coherence speckles and other artifacts. The Q-Phase operates in a holographic mode, and the phase-shifting procedure is not necessary. The optical thickness of cells is calculated from the holographic fringes using Fourier transforms. The exposure time is thus reduced to one camera frame, and faster processes can be observed. The Q-Phase implementation of iQPI features coherence gating and thus offers not only accurate quantitation of 2D cell motility but also qualitative analysis in 3D environments such as collagen gel29. The Q-Phase has been proven as a valuable tool for the characterization of primary cancer cells30, the distinction of different types of cancer cell death31,32, and studying oxidative stress resistance in metastatic prostate cancer33. The microscope is also equipped with an accurate multi-position stage and fluorescence. The Q-Phase is thus suitable for further research in cancer cell biology and has the potential of contributing to personalized cancer treatment.
Methods
Cell culture and labeling
Regularly passaged pneumocytes type II and A549 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum and kept at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere enriched with 5% CO2.
Pneumocytes type II seeded in 12-well plates were labeled by a specially developed procedure13. Briefly, CellTracker Orange CMTMR (Invitrogen Ltd) was diluted to 100 μM concentration in DMSO (Sigma) and kept at – 20 °C for at least 2 weeks before use. We found that without the unusually high concentration and long incubation at − 20 °C, the plasma membrane labeling internalizes and photo-bleaches rapidly. The confluent cells were labeled with 1.5 μM concentration for 5 min at 4 °C and subsequently washed.
For the invasion assay, the A549 cells close to confluency in vented flasks were labeled with 10 μM green Vybrant DiO solution (Invitrogen, USA) by a 15 min incubation at 37 °C and subsequently washed, released by brief exposure to trypsin versene solution (1:5) and placed above the labeled pneumocytes into the 12-well plates ready for microscopy.
The T15 sarcoma cells34,35 were maintained in MEM with Hank’s salts supplemented with 10% bovine serum (SML, Germany), 0.09% sodium bicarbonate, 0.12 g/l Na-pyruvate (Sigma), and 1 mM glutamine, at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
For the iQPI recording, the T15 or A549 cells were seeded on coverslips and placed over a chamber slide consisting of a drilled through slide with a coverslip permanently glued to the bottom side of the slide with Sylgard 184 (Dow Corning) and filled with medium with or without chemotherapeutic drugs. The top coverslip with cells on the underside was sealed on with a wax mixture made from beeswax (Fisher), soft yellow paraffin (Fisher), and paraffin wax (melting point 46 °C; Fisher) in the ratio 1:1:1.
Invasion assay
The invasion assay is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S11 online, showing a 3D reconstruction of an adherent and an invading cell. The invasion assay time-lapse acquiring alternating fluorescence images in red and green channels with 15-min lapse interval was performed for 210 min with Metamorph software (Universal Imaging) and inverted ECLIPSE TE2000-E Microscope (Nikon), which was equipped with 10 ×/0.3 objective lens and iXonEM+ DU-888 back-illuminated EMCCD scientific camera (Andor). The microscope was placed in a 37 °C environmental incubator with the delivery of humidified CO2 atmosphere (Life Imaging Services). The full observation field recorded by the camera was 1308 × 1308 μm.
The acquired invasion assay time-lapse recordings were analyzed by automatic image processing. The A549 cells were segmented and tracked as green objects. The fraction of invading A549 cells was determined by their coincidence with openings in the pneumocyte monolayer detected by a significant reduction of the red fluorescence signal at the same location as illustrated in Fig. 2. The performance of the procedure was manually validated.
iQPI
Our iQPI was achieved by a double beam transmitted-light interference Leitz microscope (Horn design) and was based on the previously developed DRIMAPS system36. We adapted the DRIMAPS system by newly introducing stable LED illumination, Hamamatsu Orca ER CCD camera with high dynamic range and easy-to-upgrade Micro-manager37 control. The illumination beam from the 530 nm LED is separated on a beam splitter, and the two parts progress through 2 identical microscopes in one housing. Only one of the beams, the object beam, passes through cells and the other, the reference beam, travels through a dummy chamber without cells. The two beams are recombined in front of a Hamamatsu Orca ER CCD camera where they interfere and the optical thickness of cells, having introduced a phase shift in the object beam, results in intensity changes on the camera chip. These intensity changes depend on the optical thickness of cells sinusoidally. To achieve linear measurements of the cell thickness, we use a phase-shifting procedure, which introduces an additional overall phase shift by a motorized optical wedge in the reference beam. The movement of the optical wedge is accurately synchronized with fast image acquisition under computer control using script in Micro-Manager. Four frames are acquired at each time point in the time-lapse sequence with a shift of π/4. The Optical Path Difference (OPD) is then simply calculated as the arctangent of a ratio of 2 image differences38. The OPD introduced by cells depends on the amount of dry-material in the cells and its specific refractive index. Since the specific refractive indices of all main components of cells are similar, the OPD can be expressed as dry mass density using an average specific refractive index39. Our image processing was based on a previously developed system for analysis of subconfluent cells40 and was further improved in Mathematica (Wolfram) and C. The system includes removal of background fluctuations, background reconstruction and subtraction. The background reconstruction uses the most frequent phase values in time. Areas covered by cells during the entire time-lapse do not feature dominant phase values and are interpolated by a novel algorithm utilizing local values in the periphery of these areas and more global values in their centers, ensuring smooth features of the reconstructed background. An example of a quantitative phase image before thresholding is presented in Supplementary Fig. S12 online and demonstrates clean background allowing thresholding level around 1% of the maximum cell signal preserving details in the cell periphery. Subsequent cell segmentation newly allows the segmented cells to contain negative phase values, which is important to preserve accuracy in the thinnest parts of the cells. The segmentation is followed by automatic cell tracking based on the nearest object with a similar mass in the next frame and calculation of morphometric parameters, protrusions, and retractions.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Fitzmaurice, C. et al. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 1, 505–527 (2015).
Ferlay, J. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur. J. Cancer 49, 1374–1403 (2013).
Arnold, M. et al. Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: Analysis of the European Cancer Observatory. Eur. J. Cancer 51, 1164–1187 (2015).
Chaturvedi, A. K. et al. Worldwide trends in incidence rates for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 4550–4559 (2013).
Roitshtain, D. et al. Quantitative phase microscopy spatial signatures of cancer cells. Cytometry. A 91, 482–493 (2017).
Park, Y., Depeursinge, C. & Popescu, G. Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine. Nat. Photonics 12, 578–589 (2018).
Cavanna, T., Pokorná, E., Veselý, P., Gray, C. & Zicha, D. Evidence for protein 4.1B acting as a metastasis suppressor. J. Cell Sci. 120, 606–616 (2007).
Zicha, D., Dunn, G. A. & Brown, A. F. A new direct-viewing chemotaxis chamber. J. Cell Sci. 99, 769–775 (1991).
Zicha, D., Dunn, G. & Jones, G. Analyzing chemotaxis using the Dunn direct-viewing chamber. Methods Mol. Biol. 75, 449–457 (1997).
Mardia, K. V. Statistics of directional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 37, 349–393 (1975).
Milliken, G. A. & Johnson, D. E. Analysis of messy data: Designed experiments. J. Mark. Res. JMR 1, 22 (1992).
Zicha, D. et al. Rapid actin transport during cell protrusion. Science 300, 142–145 (2003).
Hagglund, S. et al. Novel shear flow assay provides evidence for non-linear modulation of cancer invasion. Front. Biosci. 14, 3085–3093 (2009).
Rusciano, D., Welch, D. R. & Burger, M. Selection of metastatic variants. Cancer Metast. 29, 161–183 (2000).
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).
Wong, S. Y. et al. Protein 4.1B suppresses prostate cancer progression and metastasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12784–12789 (2007).
Meyer, A. S. et al. 2D protrusion but not motility predicts growth factor-induced cancer cell migration in 3D collagen. J. Cell Biol. 197, 721–729 (2012).
Zicha, D., Genot, E., Dunn, G. A. & Kramer, I. M. TGFbeta1 induces a cell-cycle-dependent increase in motility of epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 112, 447–454 (1999).
Sheridan, J. T. et al. Roadmap on holography. J. Opt. 22, 123002 (2020).
Dunn, G., Weber, I. & Zicha, D. Protrusion, retraction and the efficiency of cell locomotion. Dyn. Cell Tissue Motion 1, 33–46 (1997).
Molina-Arcas, M., Hancock, D. C., Sheridan, C., Kumar, M. S. & Downward, J. Coordinate direct input of both KRAS and IGF1 receptor to activation of PI3 kinase in KRAS-mutant lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 3, 548–563 (2013).
Zangle, T. A. & Teitell, M. A. Live-cell mass profiling: an emerging approach in quantitative biophysics. Nat. Methods 11, 1221–1228 (2014).
Zicha, D. Quantitative imaging in metastasis research. Int. Drug. Discov. 1, 68–72 (2010).
Vasilenko, I., Metelin, V., Kardasheva, Z., Balkanov, A. & Lifenko, R. Evaluation of metastatic potential of circulating tumor cells using quantitative phase imaging (QPI). Proc. SPIE 1, 10887 (2019).
Murray, G. F. et al. QPI allows in vitro drug screening of triple negative breast cancer PDX tumors and fine needle biopsies. Front. Phys. 7, 158 (2019).
Mir, M., Bergamaschi, A., Katzenellenbogen, B. S. & Popescu, G. Highly sensitive quantitative imaging for monitoring single cancer cell growth kinetics and drug response. PLoS ONE 9, e89000 (2014).
Frame, F. M. et al. Tumor heterogeneity and therapy resistance: Implications for future treatments of prostate cancer. J. Cancer Metast. Treat. 3, 302–314 (2017).
Hellesvik, M., Øye, H. & Aksnes, H. Exploiting the potential of commercial digital holographic microscopy by combining it with 3D matrix cell culture assays. Sci. Rep. 10, 14680 (2020).
Tolde, O. et al. Quantitative phase imaging unravels new insight into dynamics of mesenchymal and amoeboid cancer cell invasion. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–13 (2018).
Gál, B. et al. Distinctive behaviour of live biopsy-derived carcinoma cells unveiled using coherence-controlled holographic microscopy. PLoS ONE 12, e0183399 (2017).
Balvan, J. et al. Multimodal holographic microscopy: Distinction between apoptosis and oncosis. PLoS ONE 10, 1–16 (2015).
Vicar, T., Raudenska, M., Gumulec, J. & Balvan, J. The quantitative-phase dynamics of apoptosis and lytic cell death. Sci. Rep. 10, 1566 (2020).
Balvan, J. et al. Oxidative stress resistance in metastatic prostate cancer: Renewal by self-eating. PLoS ONE 10, 1–23 (2015).
Veselý, P. & Weiss, R. A. Cell locomotion and contact inhibition of normal and neoplastic rat cells. Int. J. Cancer 11, 64–76 (1973).
Veselý, P. et al. Patterns of in vitro behaviour characterizing cells of spontaneously metastasizing K2M rat sarcoma. Folia Biol. 33, 307–324 (1987).
Dunn, G. A. & Zicha, D. Phase-shifting interference microscopy applied to the analysis of cell behavior. Cell Behav. Adhes. Motil. 47, 91–106 (1993).
Edelstein, A., Amodaj, N., Hoover, K., Vale, R. & Stuurman, N. Computer control of microscopes using micromanager. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 14, 20 (2010).
Creath, K. V Phase-Measurement Interferometry Techniques Vol. 26, 349–393 (Elsevier, 1988).
Davies, H. G. & Wilkins, M. H. Interference microscopy and mass determination. Nature 169, 541 (1952).
Zicha, D. & Dunn, G. A. An image-processing system for cell behavior studies in subconfluent cultures. J. Microsc. Oxford 179, 11–21 (1995).
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Dr. Michal Šimíček for performing the invasion experiments with pneumocytes type II and A549 cells during his sabbatical in my laboratory. Andrew Walsh, a visiting student from the University of York, helped with time-lapse recording of T15 cells. This research received institutional funding from Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, Lincoln’s Inn Fields Laboratories, 44 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PX.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no direct competing interests. The employer, Brno University of Technology, is an assignee of the patents (CZ 302491; US 8,526,003 B2; EP 2378244 B1; EA 018804 B1; JP 5510676) used in the Q-Phase microscope.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zicha, D. Addressing cancer invasion and cell motility with quantitative light microscopy. Sci Rep 12, 1621 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05307-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05307-7
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.