Abstract
Some of ultrafine-grained (UFG) metals including UFG twinning induced plasticity (TWIP) steels have been found to overcome the paradox of strength and ductility in metals benefiting from their unique deformation modes. Here, this study provides insights into the atomistic process of deformation twin nucleation at Σ3{111} twin boundaries, the dominant type of grain boundary in this UFG high manganese TWIP steel. In response to the applied tensile stresses, grain boundary sliding takes place which changes the structure of coherent Σ3{111} twin boundary from atomistically smooth to partly defective. High resolution transmission electron microscopy demonstrates that the formation of disconnection on Σ3{111} twin boundaries is associated with the motion of Shockley partial dislocations on the boundaries. The twin boundary disconnections act as preferential nucleation sites for deformation twin that is a characteristic difference from the coarse-grained counterpart, and is likely correlated with the lethargy of grain interior dislocation activities, frequently seen in UFG metals. The deformation twin nucleation behavior will be discussed based on in-situ TEM deformation experiments and nanoscale strain distribution analyses results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ultrafine-grained (UFG) and nanocrystalline metals and alloys have attracted intensive research interest since their birth because of their potential to achieve extraordinary properties over conventional coarse-grained (CG) counterparts. This has led to a series of studies regarding the synthesis, processing, characterization, and potential applications of UFG and nanocrystalline metals and alloys in the past few decades1,2,3,4,5. Similar to many other high strength metals and alloys, UFG metals and alloys commonly exhibit a high strength/hardness that is generally accompanied by poor ductility, known as the strength-ductility paradox, regardless of their crystal structure, for example, UFG aluminum (face-centered cubic)2,6, UFG iron and interstitial free steels (body-centered cubic)6,7, and nanograined copper alloys (face-centered cubic)2. The yield strength of materials increases monotonously with decreasing in the grain size, which is generally described by the Hall–Petch relationship8,9. The tensile ductility drops immediately when the average grain size becomes smaller than 1 µm, which is related to the characteristics of UFG microstructure, that is, fine grains leave very little space for dislocation dynamics leading to a less enhanced strain-hardening rate and resulting in the plastic instability during deformation10,11.
Recently, a high strength and moderate ductility are simultaneously achieved in a UFG magnesium alloy12, a UFG Fe–Ni–C metastable austenitic steel13, and UFG high manganese Twinning Induced Plasticity (TWIP) steels14,15,16. Experimental results of these materials indicate that nonconventional or reverse-order deformation modes were activated in addition to the normal dislocation slip, specifically, <c + a> dislocations activation in the UFG Mg alloy, martensitic transformation in the UFG metastable austenitic steel, and deformation twinning in the UFG TWIP steels. Tsuji et al.13 suggest that the sequential activation of different deformation modes would foster the regeneration of strain-hardening ability during plastic deformation and lead to a high strength and large ductility because of possible interactions between different deformation modes, in other words, overcoming the paradox of strength and ductility. However, the detailed mechanisms to activate such nonconventional deformation modes are not fully understood yet.
The authors have recently investigated the activation factors of different deformation modes in a UFG austenitic TWIP steel14. Our results indicate that the activation takes place in the very early stage of plastic deformation like near the macroscopic yield point, and the grain size plays a major role in deformation mode alternation; deformation twin nucleation occurred at the grain boundaries in under-1 µm austenitic grains, while the normal in-grain slip was mostly observed in over-1 µm grains. This grain size dependence could be attributed to the lack of initial mobile dislocations and inactive in-grain dislocation sources; both are characteristics of the UFG microstructure. Because of its technical and scientific importance, the deformation twinning behavior in conjunction with mechanical properties has been extensively studied in conventional CG TWIP steels17,18,19. However, theses deformation twinning mechanisms based on the arrangement of highly coordinated Shockley partial dislocations on {111} slip planes20,21,22,23,24 appear to be insufficient to explain the grain boundary mediated deformation twinning in the UFG TWIP steels because the deformation twinning in UFG TWIP steels appears to be highly correlated with grain boundary structure.
Regarding the correlation between grain boundary character and deformation twin mechanism, only handful studies have carried out even on the conventional CG TWIP steels25,26. Our recent in-situ TEM deformation study has demonstrated that the deformation twin nucleation at a Σ3{111} twin boundary in the CG microstructure occurs only when a localized stress concentration field formed by dislocation pile-up at the grain boundary26. This deformation twin nucleation behavior is unlikely feasible in the UFG microstructure because the grain interior dislocation activities are no longer predominant thus limiting in-grain dislocation pile-up at a twin boundary 14,27. This leads an open question, that is, what mechanism would promote the deformation twin nucleation at a Σ3{111} twin boundary, which is the dominant boundary type in the UFG TWIP steels, when the localized stress concentration field cannot be generated by dislocation pile-up, or localized stress concentration field is no longer necessary for the deformation twin nucleation in the UFG TWIP steels.
In this study, we aim to address the question by carefully observing the internal behavior of Σ3{111} twin boundaries subjected to external tensile stresses and revealing the deformation twin nucleation process on the boundaries in a UFG high manganese TWIP steel. A carbon-free UFG high-manganese steel was selected for this study to minimize possible additional effects such as the serrated flow that frequently takes place in carbon-containing TWIP steels28. The detailed deformed microstructure near Σ3{111} twin boundaries and their local strain level were investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning transmission microscopy (STEM) techniques to shed a light on the atomistic process of deformation twin nucleation in the UFG microstructure.
Results
The microstructure of both undeformed and tensile-strained UFG TWIP steel samples were firstly characterized by EBSD. The UFG TWIP steel has the identical chemical composition and stacking fault energy (SFE) with the CG TWIP steel we previously studied (Fe-31Mn-3Al-3Si wt.%, SFE = 40 mJ m−2)29, while the average grain size is about 20 times smaller than that of the CG one, 0.79 µm instead of 15.4 µm. Three grain boundary maps for the undeformed and two different tensile-strained samples are shown in Fig. 1a–c, respectively. Black lines represent the high-angle grain boundaries with the rotation angle θ, 15° ≤ θ < 60°, and red lines represent annealing twin boundaries, known as Σ3{111} twin boundaries. Figure 1a demonstrates that the microstructure prior to tensile straining were composed of undeformed single austenite phase.
Kernel average misorientation (KAM) maps for these three samples are shown in Fig. 1d–f. The KAM analysis provides a qualitative analysis of the local misorientation that is strongly influenced by the density of geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs)30. The undeformed sample in Fig. 1d shows very little local misorientation over the entire scanned area containing both in the grain interior and near grain boundary regions, suggesting that only uninfluential amounts of deformations were introduced during the EBSD sample preparation. When the samples were tensile strained to the engineering strain of 0.046 and 0.062, the local misorientation were observed mainly around grain boundaries as indicated by white arrows in Fig. 1e and f. Since the local misorientation is a function of the GND density, the uneven distribution suggests that the heterogeneous dislocation dynamics at individual grain boundaries were somehow triggered then proceeded by the applied tensile stress. Although the level of plastic strain accumulated near grain boundaries cannot be quantified, the level of the plastic strain accumulation appears to be correlated with the grain boundary misorientation. For example, in Fig. 1c and f, the GND density near coherent Σ3{111} twin boundaries (marked by green arrows) are clearly less pronounced than those in other general high-angle grain boundaries. Whether the Σ3{111} twin boundaries were deformed or not cannot be immediately confirmed in here solely based on the EBSD with the scan step size of 50 nm. Therefore, further microstructure observations in Σ3{111} twin boundaries were conducted to have a better insight of local microstructure, and their microstructure would be compared with those in general high-angle grain boundaries.
In Fig. 2, the sample deformed to the engineering strain of 0.062 was characterized by TEM with a particular focus on the deformed regions near grain boundaries. Two general high-angle grain boundaries where the adjoining lattices are tilted by 47.5° along [1 4 10] axis and a [011] Σ 9 tilt boundary are shown in Fig. 2a and b, respectively. As a molecular dynamics simulation reveals that the latter boundary has a great potential to emit partial dislocations31, and in fact, both boundaries were found to act as a nucleation site for deformation twin. The dark contrast indicated by the white arrows appears to be induced by a dislocation reaction within the grain boundary, i.e., a deformation twinning event associated with a grain-boundary dislocation dissociation. In Fig. 2c–e, three twin lamellas having different sizes ranging from 100 to 500 nm were observed. The narrow twin width, i.e., nanometer grain size, made the activation of in-grain dislocations difficult, meanwhile deformation twin nucleation at Σ3{111} twin boundaries was evident. Strain contrast that uniformly spread along the Σ3{111} twin boundaries was observed regardless of the width of twin lamellar. This characteristic localized strain contrast within the Σ3{111} twin boundaries as well as deformation twins observed near/at twin boundaries shown in the three TEM images were not identified by the EBSD analysis possibly because of the limitation of EBSD’s spatial resolution, i.e., the size of deformation twins (~ 3 nm) and the extremely localized strain within Σ3{111} twin boundary are too small to be identified.
Figure 3a–d are selected frames extracted from an in-situ TEM tensile deformation test movie (full video provided in Supplementary Information). Several stacking faults were nucleated on both sides of an annealing twin grain, i.e., the two Σ3{111} twin boundaries. In addition, a few dislocations were observed in the upper left corner. These are indicated by the arrows filled with dots and the black arrow in the figures, respectively. It is worth noting that the stacking faults were inclined relative to the incident electron beam in this imaging condition thus they look wider. In the initial stage of plastic deformation, the nucleation of stacking faults from both sides of an annealing twin grain, as well as a few dislocations gliding took place simultaneously as seen in Fig. 3a and b. The observed stacking faults emission from the Σ3{111} twin boundary without having noticeable in-grain dislocation − Σ3{111} twin boundary interaction suggests that no localized stress concentration field was generated by the dislocation pile-up for twin nucleation. The contrast of the stacking fault on the left hand side of Σ3{111} twin boundary was vanished in Fig. 3c, which could be ascribed by the emission of the trailing partial dislocation or the third overlapping stacking fault that made the contrast of the stacking fault nearly invisible, i.e., phase angle α becomes 2π as equivalent as the perfect lattice32. The leading Shockley partial dislocations were continuously emitted from the Σ3{111} twin boundary (Fig. 3d) as the in-grain slip was significantly suppressed and the stacking fault became visible again. The outer fringe contrast of the fault 2 (F2) turned from dark to bright, i.e., two stacking faults (F1 and F2) were overlapping and showed the reversal fringe contrast. These spontaneously successive emission events occur rapidly at the Σ3{111} twin boundary and is found to be characteristically different from the one induced by in-grain dislocations− Σ3{111} twin boundary interaction in the CG counterpart in Supplementary Fig. S126. A Thompson tetrahedron inserted in Fig. 3d provides the crystallographic relationship between the Σ3{111} twin boundary and the emitted stacking fault. In the deformation process, Shockley partial dislocations having the Burgers vector of b1 and b2 will glide on the twin plane of \(\overline{\text{ACD}}\) while Shockley partial dislocations having the Burgers vector of \({\text{b}}_{\alpha }\) and \({\text{b}}_{\beta}\) on the plane of \(\overline{\text{ABC}}\) will be emitted to the grain.
A BF image in Fig. 4a illustrates a pair of deformed Σ3{111} twin boundaries and a few thin deformation twins (black arrow). The upper side Σ3{111} twin plane and the leftmost deformation twin plane were identified to be (11\(\overline{1}\)) and (\(\overline{1}{\text{1}}\overline{1}\)), respectively, from the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern taken from a [011]fcc zone axis in the inset of Fig. 4a. The tensile axis (a double-white arrow) was determined to be nearly [\(\overline{2}\)5\(\overline{5}\)] with respect to the crystal frame of matrix. Applying the Schmid’s law to estimate the resolved shear stresses on slip planes, the [\(\overline{2}\)5\(\overline{5}\)]matrix tensile axis causes the resolved shear stress applied on {111} 〈112 〉 leading Shockley partial dislocation to be larger than those applied on {111} 〈110 〉 perfect dislocations and {111} 〈112 〉 trailing Shockley partial dislocations in both Σ3{111} twin plane and deformation twin plane. For example, the Schmid factor for a/6[2 \(\overline{1}\)1] leading Shockley partial dislocation gliding on (11\(\overline{1}\text{)}\) planes is as high as 0.488, i.e., twice larger than that for the a/6[\(\overline{1}\)21] and the a/6[112] trailing partial dislocations, which would promote the leading Shockley partial dislocation to glide on the planes adjacent to the twin plane during plastic deformation. To probe detailed insights of how the Σ3{111} twin boundary being deformed and the origin of those localized contrasts around Σ3{111} twin boundaries, two squared regions on the Σ3{111} twin boundaries (Fig. 4a) were examined by the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) imaging technique. Figure 4b and c are the corresponding HRTEM images taken from a [011]fcc zone axis, showing (i) atomistic steps with the height of two or three {111} lattice spacings (Fig. 4b), which are usually described as twinning dislocations with disconnection character33,34. We denote them as twin boundary disconnection in here (ii) a deformation twin nucleated at a step (disconnection) (Fig. 4c). A pair of experimental and Fourier-filtered HRTEM images in Fig. 4b exhibit two disconnections (A and B) having a two- and three- monolayer height, respectively, while Fig. 4c shows a deformation twin nucleated from a three-monolayer height step (disconnection). The disconnection consisted of partial dislocations on the successive (11\(\overline{1}\)) planes causes the Σ3{111} twin boundary to migrate into the neighboring matrix-lamellae thus consequently thickening the original twin-lamellae. In Fig. 4c, the twin boundary disconnection appears to act as a nucleation site for deformation twin. The characteristic strain contrast along the Σ3{111} twin boundaries observed in the BF TEM images appears to be originated from the strain fields associated with disconnections and/or dislocations gliding on the several (11\(\overline{1}\)) planes adjacent to the Σ3{111} twin plane.
Strain mapping by the parallel-nanoprobe scanning transmission electron microscopy (μP-STEM) technique was performed on the regions in/near an Σ3{111} twin boundary in Fig. 5. Three regions of interest are marked as Region—I, II, and III. A section of the Σ3{111} twin boundary and deformation twins were included in Region—I and II to compare with the Region-III where deformation twinning has not taken place. First, the Σ3{111} twin boundary was tilted to the edge-on condition, such that the incident electron beam direction was parallel to the Σ3{111} twin boundary plane. A series of over 600 electron diffraction patterns were acquired from the 125 × 125 nm square in Region-I and the 50 × 50 nm square in Region- II and III, with a distance of 5 nm and 2 nm between diffraction patterns, respectively. The probe size was less than 2 nm for this analysis. Secondly, to calculate the strain from the diffraction patterns, a custom-made data processing software package combined with the nanobeam diffraction (NBD) analysis software package (System In Frontier, Inc., Japan) was employed. The software detects the central point of all recognizable diffraction spots in each of electron diffraction patterns, then computes changes in distance between individual diffraction spots and the origin (the center spot). The strain relative to the reference point will be calculated and visualized according to a specific direction. The reference point can arbitrary be selected but usually chose from an unstrained area. In light of distinct strain contrast arising from dislocation reactions on Σ3{111} twin boundary, the relative strain along a [11\(\overline{1}\)] crystallographic orientation, i.e., in the direction of Σ3{111} twin boundary normal, was calculated in here. Finally, a 2D strain map in a [11\(\overline{1}\)] crystallographic orientation was generated. The least strained position within each of regions (black cross marker in Region I, II, and III) was selected to be the reference point, thus the positive (tension) and negative (compression) strain displayed in here were relative to the reference point. Figure 5b shows that a huge amount of tensile strain arose in part of the Σ3{111} twin boundary, while the tensile strain below that area of the Σ3{111} twin boundary (white arrow) was much less pronounced. Similarly, another localized tensile strain on the Σ3{111} twin boundary was observed in Fig. 5c drastically decreased only a short distance apart. Based on these strain maps, the areas where the deformation twins nucleated have a relatively less pronounced strain field, suggesting that strain relaxation associated with deformation twinning appears to take place within the Σ3{111} twin boundary, which reduces the stored strain. Region-III in Fig. 5d demonstrates a pronounced localized strain field (white arrows) at the Σ3{111} twin boundary. Based on the corresponding microstructure shown in Fig. 4b, the disconnections (steps) are a high strain site. Some of the disconnections would act as a nucleation site for deformation twin if the deformation could continuously proceed as localized stress exceeding the twinning stress.
Discussion
The main finding of the present study is that the Σ3{111} twin boundaries in the UFG TWIP steel can be a nucleation site for deformation twins by a possible three-step deformation process: (1) forming disconnections as a result of twin boundary dislocation dynamics under applied stresses, (2) multiplying and propagating disconnections on the originally atomistically smooth boundaries, (3) increasing localized strain at disconnections stimulating preferential deformation twin nucleation. Here, the differences in the microstructural response of the Σ3{111} twin boundaries between the present UFG TWIP steel and the coarse-grained counterpart26 will be discussed.
Deformation activities at/near grain boundaries in face-centered cubic metals have been extensively described, both in experimentally26,35,36 and theoretically31,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44. Grain boundaries can be an effective dislocation source if their rotation axis is well aligned with the dislocation lines of Shockley partials or perfect dislocations such as a [112] Σ21 tilt boundary45 or a [011] Σ9 tilt boundary (Fig. 2b)31, or if their excess free volume within grain boundary regions could facilitate the formation of Shockley partial dislocation. On the other hand, there is absence of grain boundary dislocation and free volume in coherent Σ3{111} twin boundary. Accordingly, it is generally believed that the coherent Σ3{111} twin boundary unlikely acts as a proactive dislocation source. To explain the nucleation of deformation twin at Σ3{111} twin boundaries shown in Fig. 2b–d, the coherent Σ3{111} twin boundaries in the present UFG TWIP steel need to be either inherently defective or becoming defective during the plastic deformation.
In the present study, the structure of the representative coherent Σ3{111} twin boundaries prior to tensile straining was a perfect and atomistically smooth configuration with no disconnection (defective step), as shown in Fig. 6a. Although some large incoherent Σ3{112} twin boundaries were observed along the coherent Σ3{111} twin boundaries (Fig. 6b), these incoherent Σ3{112} twin boundaries were formed by annealing and considered to be stable compared with the under 1 nm height steps formed by deformation34,46,47,48. The characteristic strain contrast that uniformly spreads along the deformed Σ3{111} twin boundaries (Fig. 2c–e), was not present on the incoherent Σ3{112} twin boundaries, thus the accumulated strain on this type of incoherent twin boundary is not high enough to trigger the deformation twin nucleation, if that is the case.
To determine the Burgers vector of the twin boundary dislocations associated with the twin boundary disconnection, the Burgers circuit approach34,49,50 was applied as schematically illustrated in Fig. 7. Two enclosed Burgers circuits labeled “A” and “B” were drawn to analyze the twin boundary disconnections. The lattice vectors traveling around the circuits were recorded and labeled from t1 to t8, i.e., the vectors from t1 to t4 and the vectors from t5 to t8 were defined with respect to the crystal frame of grain I (Twin) and grain II (Matrix), respectively. The Burgers vector of twin boundary dislocation can be determined by the summation of the lattice vectors when lattice vectors of t5 ~ t8 were coordinately transformed into the ones in crystal frame of twin. The Burgers vector of the twin boundary dislocation then can be expressed as the following:
where the translation vectors of t1 ~ t8 are listed in Fig. 7. This Burgers vector of the twin boundary dislocation in the circuit A was determined to have a mixed character, i.e., the Burgers vector of twin boundary dislocation can be described by two specific displacement shift complete (DSC) lattice vectors:
where d1 and d3 are the DSC lattice vectors illustrated in the schematic of Fig. 7. On the other hand, the summation of the lattice vectors in the circuit B is zero. This result indicates that the three-monolayer height disconnection could be free of lattice defects, or there are two partial dislocations having opposite signs. In the present study, multiple Σ3{111} twin boundaries were carefully examined prior to tensile straining and confirmed to have no disconnection as discussed in Fig. 6. Thus, to the best of the authors knowledge, the three-monolayer height disconnection in here was formed by deformation rather than inherently defective.
A quantitative analysis of nanoscale strain distribution indicates the correlation between local strain level and deformation twinning behavior. The strain level at/near the disconnection in Fig. 5d is approximately 3.65% ± 0.32 in average by taking all individual data points in the near- disconnection region into account, while the strain level near the disconnection with a deformation twin in Fig. 5c is significantly low, approximately − 0.02% ± 0.52 in average. Our Burgers circuit approach indicates that the strain concentration at the step in Fig. 5d is notable due to the contribution of the twin boundary dislocations and this is consistent with the strain field of the Shockley partial dislocation having a pure edge component51,52. In contrast, the disappearance of localized strain field in Fig. 5c is likely caused by the nucleation of deformation twin.
The mechanism to form a nucleation site for deformation twins is schematically illustrated in Fig. 8a, which represents the case in Fig. 4c where a 4-atomiclayered deformation twin was formed from a 3-monolayer height disconnection. In general, when grain interior dislocation sources become deplete or inactive due to the grain size constraint, grain boundary sliding would occur and generating dislocations or disconnections mainly at grain boundary triple junctions27,53,54. As a result, these disconnection propagations on Σ3{111} twin boundary results multiple disconnections, i.e., the atomistic step having few monolayers in height, on the originally atomistically smooth twin boundaries, that accommodates the misfit between two sides of grains across the twin boundary. The multiple disconnections emitted sequentially from triple junction and coexisted on the neighboring {111} twin plane are similar to the internal behavior observed by in situ atomistic resolution TEM experiment54 where a Σ11(113) coherent grain boundary showed a layer-by-layer migration behavior due to the sequential nucleation and lateral motion of grain boundary disconnections. This disconnection activity combination with shear coupled grain boundary migration was also observed in a nanocrystalline gold metal by in situ TEM deformation experiments and considered to be the dominant deformation mechanism55. The disconnections can act as preferential nucleation sites for stacking faults because the localized stress concentration field at/near disconnections could exceed the twinning stress during plastic deformation, thus allow in-grain dislocation slip transfer in the later stage of plastic deformation49,56. This grain boundary sliding process appears to be phenomenologically similar to the grain boundary migration mechanism originally proposed by Hirth49,57 and experimentally observed in the deformed microstructure of several nanograined coppers46,47,58,59.
The nucleation mechanism of ~ 1 nm thick deformation twin at a disconnection is schematically illustrated in Fig. 8b. The emission of closely spaced overlapping stacking faults lying on parallel (\(\overline{1}\)1\(\overline{1}\)) planes from (i) to (iii). The Burgers vector of residual twin boundary dislocations after the nucleation of deformation twin can be determined by the following relationship:
where bR is the Burgers vector of residual twin boundary dislocation, bin is the Burgers vector of the dislocations within a disconnection, bout is the Shockley partial dislocation emitted from the disconnection. Based on the crystallographic orientation relationship between the Σ3{111} twin boundary and deformation twin, bin and bout can be designated to be 1/6[1\(\overline{2}\overline{1}\)] and1/6[21\(\overline{1}\)] respectively. As a result, the magnitude of the residual twin boundary dislocation, i.e., bR = 1/6 [\(\overline{1}\overline{3}{\text{0}}\)], becomes larger than that of bin and bout. This suggests that the formation of deformation twin from a disconnection is unlikely to be an energetically favorable event from the Burgers reaction standpoint. However, since the deformation twin as actually nucleated, the released elastic strain energy by the deformation twin nucleation could be larger than the net dislocation energy increase. By comparing the deformation twin nucleation on Σ3{111} twin boundaries in UFG and CG TWIP steels, it is concluded that localized strain accumulation is essential to stimulate the deformation twin nucleation in both grain sizes. On the other hand, the mechanism to generate the localized strain concentration depends on the grain size, that is, reducing the grain size to under 1 µm alters the region where the dominant dislocation activities occurred from grain interior to grain boundary and also allows energetically less favorable reactions (nonconventional deformation mode) proceed.
Conclusions
The deformation twin nucleation mechanism on Σ3{111} twin boundaries in a UFG Fe-31Mn-3Si-3Al austenitic TWIP steel was found to be characteristically different from that in the CG counterpart. The detailed microstructural investigation using in-situ TEM deformation, HRTEM and µP-STEM techniques has drawn the following conclusions:
-
(1)
The deformation twin nucleation can occur on all type of observed boundaries regardless of the grain boundary misorientation (character), i.e., general high-angle grain boundary, boundaries having a particular tilt axis ([011] Σ9), and low-energy coherent Σ3{111} twin boundaries are all able to be a nucleation site for deformation twins.
-
(2)
The formation of twin boundary disconnections appears to be governed by the motion of Shockley partial dislocations on the Σ3{111} twin boundary. These disconnections (defective steps) would accumulate strain and serve as the nucleation sites of deformation twins when the localized stress level exceeds the twinning stress.
-
(3)
The mechanistic difference to generate localized strain concentrations on coherent Σ3{111} twin boundaries between the UFG and the CG alloys is concluded to be originated from a unique characteristic of the UFG microstructure. The grain size constraint suppresses the in-grain dislocation activities in the UFG steel and stimulates the twin boundary dislocation activities leading to the twin boundary disconnections which act as the deformation twin nucleation sites. On the other hand, the observed periodic contrast reversal of stacking fault during the deformation twin nucleation at Σ3{111} boundaries indicates that the deformation twin formation process is likely identical between the UFG and CG microstructures once nucleated, partly due to the identical chemistry and SFE.
Materials and methods
A carbon-free UFG (0.79 ± 0.39 μm) high-manganese austenitic steel TWIP steel with intermediate SFE (40 mJ m−2) was fabricated for this work29. The chemical composition of the steel was Fe-31Mn-3Al-3Si wt%. The as-received TWIP steel was cold rolled from 12 to 1 mm (92% reduction) by multi-pass cold rolling and then heat treated in a salt bath at 950 °C for 5 min followed by water quenching to obtain the aimed grain size.
Sheet type tensile test pieces with a specific dimension, 13 × 2 mm rectangular shape, were sliced and mechanically thinned to approximately 150 µm thick for deformed microstructure characterization by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques. The 150 µm thick sheets were tensile-deformed to 0.046 and 0.062 engineering strain using a testing machine (Kammrath and Weiss Module 200 N) at a strain rate of 4.6 × 10–4 s−1 at room temperature.
Specimens for post-deformation EBSD analyses were mechanically polished by abrasive paper up to 2000-grit then electropolished. The microstructural features including grain boundary maps and local strain distribution were examined using a TSL OIM EBSD system attached to a FEI Helios 600 dual-beam field emission gun (FEG) scanning electron microscope (SEM) / focused ion beam (FIB) system. EBSD maps were acquired at 30 kV acceleration voltage and 13 mm working distance. The scanning step size was 50 nm. No data clean-up was performed except for the removal of some points with low confidence value.
The local strain distribution was evaluated from the kernel average misorientation (KAM). KAM is a local misorientation defined as the average misorientation of a point with its nearest neighbors in a grain. The average misorientation of a given point is calculated by taking that point as well as all of its nearest neighbors into account with a criterion that the misorientation exceeding threshold 3° will be discarded from the calculation, because these points are considered to belong to the adjacent grains.
Specimens prepared for post-deformation TEM analyses were cut from the center of the deformed sheets. 2 × 2 mm square shape foils were taken then mechanically thinned to 70 μm thick. The final thinning to be partly electron transparent was achieved by using a twin-jet electropolisher (Fischione Model 110) with a 95% acetic acid—5% perchloric acid electrolyte maintained at 17 °C and the applied voltage of 38 V. The TEM characterization was performed using a JEOL JEM 2100 operated at 200 kV with Gatan Orius SC200D and Ultrascan 1000XP cameras.
Specimens for in-situ deformation tests were sliced from undeformed sheets; the shape of the foils, 2 × 2 mm square shape, is identical to the one used for TEM analysis. A square shape foil was fixed on a cartridge-type blade for SATO Holder Duo (Mel-Build Co.)60 after thinned to be partly electron transparent. The strain rate was controlled at approximately 6.7 × 10–5 s−1 in this study. All videos were recorded in the bright field (BF) mode and a FEI Titan 80–300 S/TEM operated at 300 kV was used. Gatan Orius SC200D camera and Digital Micrograph with the high-resolution streaming video plug-in were used for video recording.
The FEI Titan 80-300 V S/TEM also was used in this analysis. Strain mapping was performed using the parallel-nanoprobe scanning transmission electron microscopy (µP-STEM) technique. The µP-STEM employed a 10 µm second condenser aperture to reduce the beam semi-convergence angle to be 0.13 mrad and obtained less than 2 nm probe size.
References
Verlinden, B. Severe plastic deformation of metals. Metal. Metall. 11, 165–182 (2005).
Valiev, R. Z., Alexandrov, I. V., Zhu, Y. T. & Lowe, T. C. Paradox of strength and ductility in metals processed bysevere plastic deformation. J. Mater. Res. 17, 5–8 (2002).
Saito, Y., Utsunomiya, H., Tsuji, N. & Sakai, T. Novel ultra-high straining process for bulk materials—development of the accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Acta Mater. 47, 579–583 (1999).
Tsuji, N., Saito, Y., Utsunomiya, H. & Tanigawa, S. Ultra-fine grained bulk steel produced by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Scr. Mater. 40, 795–800 (1999).
Estrin, Y. & Vinogradov, A. Extreme grain refinement by severe plastic deformation: A wealth of challenging science. Acta Mater. 61, 782–817 (2013).
Tsuji, N., Ito, Y., Saito, Y. & Minamino, Y. Strength and ductility of ultrafine grained aluminum and iron produced by ARB and annealing. Scr. Mater. 47, 893–899 (2002).
Takechi, H. Metallurgical aspects on interstitial free sheet steel from industrial viewpoints. ISIJ Int. 34, 1–8 (1994).
Petch, N. J. The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 25–28 (1953).
Hall, E. O. The deformation and ageing of mild steel: II Characteristics of the L ders deformation. Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. B 64, 742–747 (1951).
Wang, Y., Chen, M., Zhou, F. & Ma, E. High tensile ductility in a nanostructured metal. Nature 419, 912–915 (2002).
Morris, J. W. Jr. Comments on the microstructure and properties of ultrafine grained steel. ISIJ Int. 48, 1063–1070 (2008).
Zheng, R. et al. Simultaneously enhanced strength and ductility of Mg-Zn-Zr-Ca alloy with fully recrystallized ultrafine grained structures. Scr. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.024 (2017).
Tsuji, N. et al. Strategy for managing both high strength and large ductility in structural materials–sequential nucleation of different deformation modes based on a concept of plaston. Scr. Mater. 181, 35–42 (2020).
Hung, C.-Y., Bai, Y., Tsuji, N. & Murayama, M. Grain size altering yielding mechanisms in ultrafine grained high-Mn austenitic steel: Advanced TEM investigations. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 86, 192–203 (2021).
Saha, R., Ueji, R. & Tsuji, N. Fully recrystallized nanostructure fabricated without severe plastic deformation in high-Mn austenitic steel. Scr. Mater. 68, 813–816 (2013).
Lee, J.-Y., Hong, J.-S., Kang, S.-H. & Lee, Y.-K. The effect of austenite grain size on deformation mechanism of Fe-17Mn steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1, 140972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.140972 (2021).
De Cooman, B. C., Estrin, Y. & Kim, S. K. Twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) steels. Acta Mater. 142, 283–362 (2018).
Bouaziz, O., Allain, S., Scott, C. P., Cugy, P. & Barbier, D. High manganese austenitic twinning induced plasticity steels: A review of the microstructure properties relationships. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 15, 141–168 (2011).
Vercammen, S., Blanpain, B., De Cooman, B. C. C. & Wollants, P. Cold rolling behaviour of an austenitic Fe-30Mn-3Al-3Si TWIP-steel: The importance of deformation twinning. Acta Mater. 52, 2005–2012 (2004).
Venables, J. The nucleation and propagation of deformation twins. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 25, 693–700 (1964).
Cohen, J. B. & Weertman, J. A dislocation model for twinning in fcc metals. Acta Metall. 11, 996–998 (1963).
Fujita, H. & Ueda, S. Stacking faults and fcc (γ) → hcp (ε{lunate}) transformation in 18 8-type stainless steel. Acta Metall. 20, 759–767 (1972).
Miura, S., Takamura, J. & Narita, N. Orientation dependence of the flow stress for twinning in silver crystals. Trans. JIM 9, 555–562 (1968).
Mahajan, S. & Chin, G. Y. Comments on deformation twinning in silver- and copper-alloy crystals. Scr. Metall. 9, 815–817 (1975).
Beladi, H. et al. Orientation dependence of twinning and strain hardening behaviour of a high manganese twinning induced plasticity steel with polycrystalline structure. Acta Mater. 59, 7787–7799 (2011).
Hung, C.-Y., Bai, Y., Shimokawa, T., Tsuji, N. & Murayama, M. A correlation between grain boundary character and deformation twin nucleation mechanism in coarse-grained high-Mn austenitic steel. Sci. Rep. 11, 8468 (2021).
Ovid’ko, I. A., Valiev, R. Z. & Zhu, Y. T. Review on superior strength and enhanced ductility of metallic nanomaterials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 94, 462–540 (2018).
Idrissi, H., Renard, K., Ryelandt, L., Schryvers, D. & Jacques, P. J. On the mechanism of twin formation in Fe–Mn–C TWIP steels. Acta Mater. 58, 2464–2476 (2010).
Bai, Y. et al. Unique transition of yielding mechanism and unexpected activation of deformation twinning in ultrafine grained Fe-31Mn-3Al-3Si alloy. Sci. Rep. 11, 15870 (2021).
Schwartz, A. J., Kumar, M., Adams, B. L. & Field, D. P. Electron Backscatter Diffraction in Materials Science. Electron Backscatter Diffraction in Materials Science (Springer, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88136-2.
Tschopp, M. A., Tucker, G. J. & McDowell, D. L. Structure and free volume of 〈110〉 symmetric tilt grain boundaries with the E structural unit. Acta Mater. 55, 3959–3969 (2007).
Williams, D. B. & Carter, C. B. Transmission Electron Microscopy. Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Textbook for Materials Science (Springer, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76501-3.
Han, J., Thomas, S. L. & Srolovitz, D. J. Grain-boundary kinetics: A unified approach. Prog. Mater. Sci. 98, 386–476 (2018).
Hirth, J. P. & Pond, R. C. Steps, dislocations and disconnections as interface defects relating to structure and phase transformations. Acta Mater. 44, 4749–4763 (1996).
Shterner, V., Timokhina, I. B., Rollett, A. D. & Beladi, H. The role of grain orientation and grain boundary characteristics in the mechanical twinning formation in a high manganese twinning-induced plasticity steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 49, 2597–2611 (2018).
Kim, J. K., Kwon, M. H. & De Cooman, B. C. On the deformation twinning mechanisms in twinning-induced plasticity steel. Acta Mater. 141, 444–455 (2017).
Shimokawa, T. & Tsuboi, M. Atomic-scale intergranular crack-tip plasticity in tilt grain boundaries acting as an effective dislocation source. Acta Mater. 87, 233–247 (2015).
Shimokawa, T., Tanaka, M., Kinoshita, K. & Higashida, K. Roles of grain boundaries in improving fracture toughness of ultrafine-grained metals. Phys. Rev. B 83, 214113 (2011).
Mishin, Y., Asta, M. & Li, J. Atomistic modeling of interfaces and their impact on microstructure and properties. Acta Mater. 58, 1117–1151 (2010).
Tschopp, M. A. & McDowell, D. L. Dislocation nucleation in Σ3 asymmetric tilt grain boundaries. Int. J. Plast. 24, 191–217 (2008).
Spearot, D., Jacob, K. & Mcdowell, D. Dislocation nucleation from bicrystal interfaces with dissociated structure. Int. J. Plast. 23, 143–160 (2007).
Spearot, D. E., Jacob, K. I. & McDowell, D. L. Nucleation of dislocations from [001] bicrystal interfaces in aluminum. Acta Mater. 53, 3579–3589 (2005).
Schuh, C. A., Kumar, M. & King, W. E. Analysis of grain boundary networks and their evolution during grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 51, 687–700 (2003).
Randle, V. The Role of Coincidence Site Lattice in Grain Boundary Engineering (Maney Publishing, 1996).
Shimokawa, T. Asymmetric ability of grain boundaries to generate dislocations under tensile or compressive loadings. Phys. Rev. B 82, 174122 (2010).
Wang, Y. B., Sui, M. L. & Ma, E. In situ observation of twin boundary migration in copper with nanoscale twins during tensile deformation. Philos. Mag. Lett. 87, 935–942 (2007).
Wang, Y. M. et al. Defective twin boundaries in nanotwinned metals. Nat. Mater. 12, 697–702 (2013).
Zhang, L., Mao, W., Liu, M. & Shibuta, Y. Mechanical response and plastic deformation of coherent twin boundary with perfect and defective structures. Mech. Mater. 141, 103266 (2020).
Hirth, J. & Balluffi, R. On grain boundary dislocations and ledges. Acta Metall. 21, 929–942 (1973).
Frank, F. C. Crystal dislocations: Elementary concepts and definitions. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 42, 809–819 (1951).
Hirth, J. P., Lothe, J. & Mura, T. Theory of Dislocations 2nd edn. (Krieger Publishing Company, 1983).
Li, J. C. M. The interaction of parallel edge dislocations with a simple tilt dislocation wall. Acta Metall. 8, 296–311 (1960).
Ovid’Ko, I. A. & Skiba, N. V. Generation of nanoscale deformation twins at locally distorted grain boundaries in nanomaterials. Int. J. Plast. 62, 50–71 (2014).
Zhu, Q. et al. In situ atomistic observation of disconnection-mediated grain boundary migration. Nat. Commun. 10, 156 (2019).
Liebig, J. P., Mackovic, M., Spiecker, E., Göken, M. & Merle, B. Grain boundary mediated plasticity: a blessing for the ductility of metallic thin films?. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117079 (2021).
Xu, S., Xiong, L., Chen, Y. & McDowell, D. L. Sequential slip transfer of mixed-character dislocations across Σ3 coherent twin boundary in FCC metals: A concurrent atomistic-continuum study. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2, 15016 (2016).
Khater, H. A., Serra, A., Pond, R. C. & Hirth, J. P. The disconnection mechanism of coupled migration and shear at grain boundaries.. NPJ Comput. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.001 (2012).
Sennour, M., Lartigue-Korinek, S., Champion, Y. & Hÿtch, M. J. HRTEM study of defects in twin boundaries of ultra-fine grained copper. Philos. Mag. 87, 1465–1486 (2007).
You, Z. et al. Plastic anisotropy and associated deformation mechanisms in nanotwinned metals. Acta Mater. 61, 217–227 (2013).
Sato, K. et al. Development of a novel straining holder for transmission electron microscopy compatible with single tilt-axis electron tomography. Microscopy 64, 369–375 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This study was partly supported by Nanoscale Characterization and Fabrication Laboratory (NCFL), Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS), Virginia Tech and used shared facilities at the Virginia Tech National Center for Earth and Environmental Nanotechnology Infrastructure (NanoEarth), a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI), supported by NSF (ECCS 1542100, ECCS 2025151). N.T., T.S. and M.M. greatly appreciate the financial support by the JST CREST (JPMJCR1994). M.M. acknowledges a financial support by the DOE Basic Energy Science Program (BES DE-FG02-06ER15786) for technical development of TEM in-situ deformation, and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers (No. 19H02029, 20H02479). N.T. acknowledges a financial support by Elements Strategy Initiative for Structural Materials (ESISM, No. JPMXP0112101000), and JSPS KAKENHI (No. 15H05767, No. 20H00306), all through the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.H. and M.M. designed the experimental and wrote the manuscript. C.H. performed microstructural characterizations. T.S. performed dislocation and crystallography-based geometric analyses. B.Y. and N.T. fabricated the alloy and performed mechanical properties tests. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Video 1.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hung, CY., Shimokawa, T., Bai, Y. et al. Investigating the dislocation reactions on Σ3{111} twin boundary during deformation twin nucleation process in an ultrafine-grained high-manganese steel. Sci Rep 11, 19298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98875-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98875-z
This article is cited by
-
Microstructural Effect on Cold Strengthening Mechanism of MP159 Alloys
Metals and Materials International (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.