Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94443-7, published online 26 July 2021


The original version of this Article contained errors in the Introduction where,


“Let us recall the Nottingham effect comes from the energy balance between the mean energy of the emitted electrons \(\left\langle {\epsilon_{{{\text{out}}}} } \right\rangle\) and that of the replacing electrons \(\left\langle {\epsilon_{{{\text{in}}}} } \right\rangle ,W_{{\text{N}}} = \left\langle {\epsilon_{{{\text{in}}}} } \right\rangle - \left\langle {\epsilon_{{{\text{out}}}} } \right\rangle.\) It yields a heat flux at the metal/vacuum interface whose magnitude depends on the emitter current density J, \(\Phi_{{\text{N}}} = - W_{{\text{N}}} \times J/e\) where e,Nottingham temperature and is analytically found proportional to the local electric field magnitude and inversely proportional to the square root of the emitter work function7: \(T_{{\text{N}}} \propto F/\varphi^{1/2}.\)


now reads:


“Let us recall the Nottingham effect comes from the energy balance between the mean energy of the emitted electrons \(\left\langle {\epsilon_{{{\text{out}}}} } \right\rangle\) and that of the replacing electrons \(\left\langle {\epsilon_{{{\text{in}}}} } \right\rangle ,\) the so-called Nottingham energy \(W_{{\text{N}}} = \left\langle {\epsilon_{{{\text{in}}}} } \right\rangle - \left\langle {\epsilon_{{{\text{out}}}} } \right\rangle.\) It yields a heat flux at the metal/vacuum interface whose magnitude depends on the emitter current density J, according to the formula  \(\Phi_{{\text{N}}} = - W_{{\text{N}}} \times J/e\) where e is the elementary charge. Therefore, the sign of this heat flux can reverse. At a given field magnitude, the heat flux is positive (heating) below a certain temperature and reverses above, becoming negative (cooling). The inversion temperature is called the Nottingham temperature and is analytically found proportional to the local electric field magnitude and inversely proportional to the square root of the emitter work function7\(T_{{\text{N}}} \propto F/\varphi^{1/2}.\)


The original Article has been corrected.