Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Quantitative assessment of the vertebral pneumaticity in an anhanguerid pterosaur using micro-CT scanning

Abstract

Research on the postcranial skeletal pneumaticity in pterosaurs is common in the literature, but most studies present only qualitative assessments. When quantitative, they are done on isolated bones. Here, we estimate the Air Space Proportion (ASP) obtained from micro-CT scans of the sequence from the sixth cervical to the fourth dorsal vertebra of an anhanguerine pterosaur to understand how pneumaticity is distributed in these bones. Pneumatisation of the vertebrae varied between 68 and 72% of their total volume. The neural arch showed higher ASP in all vertebrae. Anhanguerine vertebral ASP was generally higher than in sauropod vertebrae but lower than in most extant birds. The ASP observed here is lower than that calculated for the appendicular skeleton of other anhanguerian pterosaurs, indicating the potential existence of variation between axial and appendicular pneumatisation. The results point to a pattern in the distribution of the air space, which shows an increase in the area occupied by the trabecular bone in the craniocaudal direction of the vertebral series and, in each vertebra, an increase of the thickness of the trabeculae in the zygapophyses. This indicates that the distribution of pneumatic diverticula in anhanguerine vertebrae may not be associated with stochastic patterns.

Introduction

Bones possessing internal air diverticula are called pneumatic bones. They differ from the non-pneumatic ones in that they present lower vascularisation as well as pneumatic foramina on their surface, which are responsible for the entrance of air into the bone through air sacs1. Among extant vertebrates, postcranial skeletal pneumaticity is restricted to birds2, but it is widely present in extinct taxa, such as pterosaurs and several nonavian dinosaurs3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, thus yielding different hypotheses on the evolutionary emergence of this feature in archosaurs3,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18.

Previous quantitative studies that analysed sections of long bones of birds used the variable K to calculate the proportion of internal space in tubular bones19,20. In order to estimate this proportion in bones of other shapes, such as vertebrae and epiphyses of long bones, Wedel21 defined the Air Space Proportion (ASP): the proportion of the volume of a given bone—or the area of a bone section—filled by air. The method was developed using sauropodomorph vertebrae21.

More recently, the ASP method has been applied to pterosaurs, but in a limited way. Elgin and Hone22 calculated the ASP of the exposed cross-sections of some bones from the same individual, including an undetermined cervical vertebra, a rib, and a few appendicular elements. Martin and Palmer23,24 determined the ASP of long bones of different specimens using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography (or micro-CT) scans, allowing measurements along virtual sections. However, studies that analyse the degree of pneumaticity of the axial skeleton of pterosaurs more broadly are still lacking. Claessens et al.15 analysed a single vertebra (the sixth cervical) of the pterosaur specimen AMNH 22555 (referred to Anhanguera25,26 and stored at the American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA), but they did not calculate the ASP. These analyses have contributed to our understanding of pterosaur pneumaticity, but because they are restricted to sampling one vertebra or bone region, they are of limited use to understand how pneumaticity could vary within an individual, species, or at broader phylogenetic levels. The ASP is a reliable and well-established quantitative method that can be used to assess postcranial pneumaticity patterns more accurately and to explore the relationship between them and the evolutionary history or ecology of a group. Here, we explore such patterns of pneumaticity through micro-CT scans of the specimen stored at the Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns/Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Munich, Germany, SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27. The fossil comes from the Romualdo Formation of the Araripe Basin (Santana Group) and is Late Aptian (Early Cretaceous) in age27,28. It was described by Veldmeijer et al.29, who tentatively identified it as Brasileodactylus sp., but due to the lack of genus-level diagnostic features, here we restrict its identification to the Anhanguerinae.29,30,31,32,33 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Simplified phylogenetic proposal of the Pterodactyloidea ingroup relationships displaying pterosaur specimens relevant in this work. General tree topology after Kellner30, Rodrigues and Kellner31, Holgado et al.32 and Holgado and Pêgas33.

The material comprises an incomplete and non-osteologically mature skeleton with both cranial and postcranial elements (Veldmeijer et al.29: figs. 3, 5–11). Although the specimen includes a sequence from the sixth cervical to the tenth dorsal vertebra (Veldmeijer et al.29: figs. 5–6), we micro-CT scanned only from the sixth cervical to the fourth dorsal vertebra (Fig. 2). The more caudal dorsal vertebrae have extremely reduced pneumatic foramina and we expected a higher variation in pneumatisation in the vertebral series near the base of the neck. The fossil has an excellent three-dimensional preservation, showing no significant signs of flattening, which allows the assessment of how pneumaticity varies along the vertebral series at the base of the neck. We calculated the ASP in consecutive bone sections of the vertebral series and suggest a more integrative approach for the issue. We aim to offer a more global understanding of the variation in pneumaticity patterns in the vertebral column of pterosaurs to provide a more accurate anatomical model for biomechanical studies.

Figure 2
figure2

Scanned vertebral sequence belonging to SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27. Abbreviations: fopn, pneumatic foramen. Scale bar: 10 mm.

Results

ASP values in the transverse sections

The transverse section of the mid-length of the neural arch was the most pneumatised section in all vertebrae analysed, with at least 77% of air space. In contrast, sections of the mid-length of the centra did not reach more than 73% of ASP, with the largest proportions observed in the seventh and ninth cervical vertebrae and in the first dorsal vertebra (Table 1).

Table 1 ASP values of the analysed transverse sections of the vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27.

The mid-length section of the neural arches had higher ASP than the zygapophyses. However, the ASP of the mid-length of the centra is higher than the cotyle and condyle in the seventh and ninth cervical vertebrae, and in the first and fourth dorsal vertebrae. In the eighth cervical and the second dorsal vertebra, the ASP of the centra increase from the condyle to the cotyle (Table 1).

Mean ASP values

Within the same vertebra, we found a higher mean ASP in the articulations of the neural arch (pre- and postzygapophyses) than in those of the centrum (cotyle and condyle), varying between 67 and 76% in the former and from 55 to 74% in the latter (Table 2). The sixth cervical vertebra was the only one that presented the opposite proportions.

Table 2 Mean ASP values of selected regions of the vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27.

ASP values did not vary significantly throughout the column, with vertebral means between 68 and 72%, with all analysed cervical vertebrae with at least 70% (Table 2). Except for the third, the dorsal vertebrae had slightly less pneumatisation than the cervical vertebrae.

Regarding the mean ASP of the centra, there was a general trend of decrease in pneumatisation from the cranial to the caudal vertebrae, with the highest mean ASP present in the sixth cervical and the lowest in the fourth dorsal (Table 2).

Discussion

Although pterosaur vertebrae are generally significantly reduced in length compared to their limb bones, the extent of pneumaticity in the vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 varied between regions, whether closer to the articulation regions or in the mid-length of the vertebra, similar to what was observed in pterosaur long bones23. This indicates the importance of analysing ASP values in different sections of a given element, even when it is not particularly long.

The centrum has a laterally and dorso-ventrally compressed region in its mid-height and mid-length, respectively34. It is compact, with smaller air cavities and more trabeculae than the neural arch (Fig. 3). The increase in the proportion of trabecular bone in the centrum may be a biomechanical requirement to guarantee structural integrity and to confer more resistance to withstand the stresses caused by the movements naturally exerted by the base of the neck35,36, since the increase in trabeculae tends to increase elastic stability37.

Figure 3
figure3

The internal architecture of trabeculae in the mid-length of the vertebrae. Slices of the scans and interpretative drawings of the mid-length of the seventh cervical vertebra (A, B) and second (C, D) and fourth (E, F) dorsal vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27. Trabeculae and cortical bone are in black in the drawings. Scale bar: 10 mm.

The mid-cervical vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 have no pneumatic foramina adjacent to the neural canal, only on the lateral surface of the centra29, differing from some other anhanguerians in which foramina are present in both regions17,25,38. Our analysis of the sections of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 indicates that internal pneumatic cavities close to the sides of the centrum spread out dorsally and increase in the area of the pedicle of the neural arches, forming large air spaces above the neural canal and establishing a highly pneumatised region independent of the presence of pneumatic foramina in that region (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure4

Internal air spaces in the mid-length of the vertebra. Slice of the scan (A) and internal air spaces marked in blue (B) in the mid-length of the vertebra of the sixth cervical vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27. Red arrows indicate small hollow cavities within the bone trabeculae. Scale bar: 10 mm.

The eighth and ninth cervical and the first dorsal vertebrae have pneumatic foramina on the bases of the transverse processes29, which are likely responsible for the entrance of air sinuses in the neural arches and in regions of the centra that are pneumatised. In these vertebrae, the centra are shorter than those of the mid-cervicals, a feature commonly observed in other ornithocheiroids38,39,40,41. Consequently, the air spaces of these centra are smaller than those of the mid-cervical vertebrae.

Most articular regions such as the zygapophyses, cotyle, and condyle presented less pneumatisation than the sections at the mid-length of the neural arches and the centra. This is expected as they need denser bone to increase resistance and absorb mechanical shocks7,42,43,44. However, differently than observed when comparing ASP of the neural arch and zygapophyses, the cotyle and condyle have pneumatisation at levels similar or higher than the mid-length section of the centrum (Table 1). This indicates that these structures may not follow a pneumatisation pattern similar to that observed in the centra. In addition, small hollow spaces within thicker bony trabeculae are commonly seen in the cotyle and condyle (Fig. 5), similar to those in the neural arch (Fig. 4). Although such cavities could actually be filled with air, they can also be associated with other soft tissues, such as blood vessels45.

Figure 5
figure5

Internal air spaces in the condyle of the vertebra. Slice of the scan (A) and internal air spaces marked in blue (B) of the condyle of the seventh cervical vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27. Red arrows indicate small hollow cavities within the bone trabeculae. Scale bar: 10 mm.

The lower ASP values of the cotyle and condyle compared to those of the zygapophyses possibly indicate a more rigid articulation in the centrum. The sixth cervical is the exception, as it presented the most pneumatised cotyle and condyle of all analysed vertebrae (Table 2), suggesting that the support for resistance in the joints of the centrum of the middle cervical vertebrae probably require less of the presence of trabecular bone than in the posterior vertebrae37.

When considering the mean ASP of each vertebra of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27, the cervical vertebrae (range 0.70–0.72; median: 0.72) are slightly more pneumatised than the dorsal vertebrae (range 0.68–0.71; median: 0.68), while the mean ASP of their neural arches is equivalent (cervical vertebrae range 0.71–0.77; median: 0.735; dorsal vertebrae range 0.70–0.74; median: 0.725).

However, a substantial decrease in air space is observed on the mean ASP of the centra between cervical and dorsal series (cervical vertebrae range 0.73–0.65; median 0.67; dorsal vertebrae range 0.66–0.58; median: 0.645), which may be related to the reduction of the length of their centra (Fig. 6). This decrease in ASP may also be a result of the increase in cortical and trabecular bone in this region of the vertebral column due to tensions caused by the movement at the base of the neck36, or indicate an additional need for other soft tissues in the centrum unrelated to the respiratory tract, as blood vessels45.

Figure 6
figure6

Relationship between pneumatisation and centrum length of the vertebrae. Mean vertebral ASP (black circles) and length of the centra (white squares) of the eight analysed vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27. CVI–IX, sixth to ninth cervical vertebrae; DI–IV, first to fourth dorsal vertebrae. Mean ASP values from Table 2. Centrum length measurements from Veldmeijer et al.29 (2009).

The increase or reduction of pneumatisation between different vertebrae—or between regions of a single vertebra—does not directly support inferences on the biomechanics of the neck of the pterosaur analysed here. To test our hypotheses, in the future we plan to carry out functional studies applying loads to pterosaur cervical vertebral series. In any case, the variation in pneumaticity presented here suggests a pattern of reduced pneumatisation in the cranio-caudal direction and a decrease between zygapophyses in relation to the neural arches. Therefore, we hypothesise that the quantitative disposition of the air space follows a pattern that may be related to the biomechanics of the neck37.The mean ASP per vertebra of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 (range 0.68–0.72; median: 0.705) was lower than the value (0.83) presented for an indeterminate azhdarchoid cervical vertebra fragment stored at the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, SMNK 398522. However, the analysed cross-section seems to belong to the middle part of the neural arch, which data collected here shows to be more pneumatised than the centra. In this case, the ASP values of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 and SMNK 3985 would be similar. Such high degree of pneumatisation had been already suggested for late pterodactyloids17,18,22,46,47.

The mean ASP of each vertebra analysed here was slightly lower than the mean ASP values of the six long bones of other anhanguerian specimens studied by Martin and Palmer23 (range 0.68–0.83; median: 0.76) (Table 3). A higher pneumatisation of the appendicular skeleton in relation to the axial is not unexpected, given the support function of the vertebral column, which tends to be more rigid. However, the azhdarchoid SMNK 3985 shows higher values in axial than in appendicular elements22, contrasting with anhanguerians. Nevertheless, the ASP of SMNK 3985 was estimated based only on one cross-section per element, which represent locations of particularly low density. Considering that pneumaticity varies throughout the length of the bones, as shown here, analyses in multiple cross-sections allow for more confident inferences on the ASP of a given element23.

Table 3 Mean ASP of the appendicular skeleton of eight pterodactyloid specimens (from Martin & Palmer23).

Martin & Palmer23 also determined the ASP of the humerus of the holotype of the tapejaromorph Bennettazhia oregonensis (Gilmore, 1928) (stored at the National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA, USNM 11925), which also has mean ASP higher than those observed in the vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27. This seems to indicate that long bones are more pneumatised than the vertebrae in the Ornitocheiroidea, but a more thorough analysis on tapejaromorphs remains to be done.

While the vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 were more pneumatised at their mid-lengths, pterodactyloid long bones, in general, have higher ASP in the articular ends23. This is explained by the extremely thin trabeculae present at the epiphyses, which provide the expected resistance for this region and yet store a large proportion of air space23. This is the opposite of what is observed in the sections of the cotyle and condyle of the vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27. Additionally, long bones have a thinner cortex at the epiphyses, contributing to reduce volume at the articular ends23. Since the biological significance of pneumatisation in axial and appendicular bones is different18, such differences in the distribution of pneumaticity between the two are expected. In the vertebrae, on the other hand, distribution of ASP seem to indicate that stress loads are higher in the articulation areas, and, therefore, denser bone would be needed to support them.

The cervical vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 are comparatively more pneumatised than vertebrae of the sauropod dinosaurs Apatosaurus sp. (specimen stored at the Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Norman, Oklahoma, USA, OMNH 01094), Brachiosaurus sp. (specimen stored at the Earth Sciences Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA, BYU 12866) and Camarasaurus sp. (OMNH 01313), which show no ASP higher than 60% (see Table 2). However, Sauroposeidon proteles (OMNH 53062) has comparatively higher ASP, as seen in the middle length and zygapophysis sections of the sixth cervical vertebra, indicating that at least some sauropods reached higher levels of vertebral pneumatisation (Table 4 – from Wedel21).

Table 4 ASP of three unidentified cervicals of the sauropod dinosaurs Apatosaurus sp., Brachiosaurus sp., and Camarasaurus sp., and of the sixth cervical vertebra of Sauroposeidon proteles (from Wedel21).

In Brachiosaurus sp. (BYU 12866) and Apatosaurus sp. (OMNH 01094), the condyles have significantly higher ASP than the cotyles (Table 4). This is also the case of the ninth cervical of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27, but opposite to the seventh and eighth cervical vertebrae (Table 1). On the other hand, the cotyle of these sauropods had very low pneumatisation, fewer than 40% ASP21, while the ASP in the least pneumatised articular end of any SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 cervical vertebrae was 56%.

Both Brachiosaurus and Apatosaurus presented higher ASP values in the condyle than in the cotyle, thus hinting to the possibility that pneumatisation in these species could increase gradually from one end to the other of the centrum. Analyses of vertebral series of sauropods are needed to test this hypothesis. Our results, however, do not indicate such pattern of pneumatisation along the vertebral centrum in the analysed anhanguerine pterosaur.

In comparison to extant birds, the vertebral ASP of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 is slightly lower than those of the posterior cervical vertebrae of extant storks (Ciconiidae), but higher than the ASP of the vertebrae of their first and second neck segments48. However, the ASP in birds was not estimated by cross-sections, but rather measured from the vertebral total volume48. Unlike what we calculated for SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27, the pneumaticity of the cervical vertebrae in storks increases posteriorly. These results suggest that the increase in pneumaticity may also be related to regions in which there is a reduction in the range of movement in some axes, and, consequently, the tensions that could exceed the limit of bone resistance also decrease48,49,50, contradicting previous hypotheses of bone reinforcement in this region of the vertebral column36. In the case of the vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27, the higher degree of pneumaticity present in the mid-cervical vertebrae could be a reflection of their long length, resulting in a low range of movement and, consequently, a decrease of the tensions on this region of the neck. However, the absence of more cranial vertebrae in the specimen analysed here makes this inference impossible to be tested at the moment.

Conclusions

The mean ASP for each vertebra of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 varied between 68 and 72%. Furthermore, we observed here a reduction of the ASP and increase in the area occupied by trabecular bone in the cranio-caudal direction in the vertebral series of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27, which may be related to a biomechanical requirement of the vertebral column36,37,48,49,50. Within the same vertebra, ASP values in the neural arch were higher at mid-length and decreased towards the zygapophyses, indicating a probable need for a higher level of stiffness44. These results support the hypothesis that pneumatisation of vertebrae follows a quantitative pattern within each vertebra and along the vertebral column that is probably determined by hitherto unrecognised variables rather than a stochastic pattern in the distribution of pneumatic diverticula.

The vertebrae investigated here are less pneumatised than anhanguerian appendicular bones analysed previously, which might be explained due to the axial skeleton's structural support function. However, studies of the same individual should be performed for more robust inferences.

The cervical vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 are more pneumatised than most sauropod vertebrae so far examined, except for Sauroposeidon proteles. The increase in pneumatisation in the mid-cervical vertebrae of SNSB/BSPG 1991 I 27 also differs from the distribution of the pneumatisation observed in the vertebrae of extant storks. Considering the influence of biomechanics on the pneumatisation of bones, this may indicate differences in the tensions exerted on the cervical series between both archosaur groups. Quantitative assessments of bone pneumaticity have the potential to fill in the gaps in our knowledge on the evolution of postcranial pneumatisation in archosaurs.

Methods

CT scans and preparation of the slices

The CT scans were performed by GS at the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany, using an X-ray micro-CT Phoenix|X-ray Nanotom scanner by GE Healthcare. Scans of the sixth cervical were made with a 0.1 mm Cu filter, but the remaining ones had none. Each scan comprised 1440 slices. The software datos|x—acquisition version 1.5.3.1 was used to acquire the data and datos|x—reconstruction version 1.5.0.22—64 bit to reconstruct the images in a three-dimensional file. Settings for different scans are listed in Table 5.

Table 5 Voltage, current and voxel size of each scanned element.

The images were exported as DICOM files with the software Volume Graphics to visualise the individual slices. The grey balance of each image was enhanced using ImageJ48 to observe the pneumatic cavities, for such the same brightness/contrast value was used for all analysed slices.

Air Space Proportion

The identification of trabecular bone in some regions of the medullary space of the vertebrae on CT scans requires extreme caution. We excluded regions with poor contrast that were difficult to visualize from our analysis and selected cross-sections that showed no beam hardening or other obfuscating effects. The Air Space Proportion (ASP)21 was calculated to compare the air volume within each vertebral region. The ASP is the ratio of air space to the total area (cortical bone + medullary space) of a transversal section, with results varying from 0 to 1, with a larger value indicating higher bone pneumatisation11,21. Since the values are obtained from a single cross-section, they will not be representative of the whole structure21. We chose the following transverse sections on each vertebra for assessment (Fig. 7): 1. vertebral centrum at mid-length; 2. neural arch at mid-length; 3. cotyle; 4. condyle; 5. prezygapophysis; and 6. postzygapophysis. Regions that are likely to require more bone stiffness and elasticity in the vertebrae43 were considered in order to analyse how pneumatisation is distributed within each vertebral region. When these sections were totally or partially absent or damaged, the measurement was not taken. All cross-sections used are available as figures in the supplementary information (Supplementary Fig. S1S35) and at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15152331.

Figure 7
figure7

Transverse sections used for ASP calculation. Light grey: pneumatic foramina. Scale bar: 10 mm.

We used Photoshop CS6 to recognise and segment the areas of the internal cavities, based on their differences in colouration (= density) to the bones. Using ImageJ software51, we converted the scale from millimetres to pixels and the areas were then measured in pixels. The obtained values were used to calculate the ASP of each transverse section. All total values for the cross-sections and areas identified as air cavities are available in Supplementary Table S1. Mean ASP values of selected regions of each vertebra were also determined: the cotyle and condyle taken together, all zygapophyses (left and right pre- and postzygapophysis), centrum (cotyle, condyle, and mid-length sections), neural arch (all measured zygapophyses and the mid-length section), and whole vertebra (calculated from all measured sections). The ASP was then compared between different sections, regions, vertebrae, and with those of sauropod vertebrae and the bones of pterosaurs already described in the literature.

Data availability

The published article includes all the data generated in the text. The analysed slices, the total areas of the air cavities and the total volume of each cross-section of the vertebrae can be found in the supplementary information. The slices are also available in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15152331).

References

  1. 1.

    O’Connor, P. M. Pulmonary pneumaticity in the postcranial skeleton of extant Aves: a case study examining Anseriformes. J. Morphol 261, 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10190 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Crisp, E. On the presence or absence of air in the bones of birds. P. Zool. Soc. Lond. 25, 215–220 (1857).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Britt, B. B. Pneumatic postcranial bones in dinosaurs and other archosaurs. PhD thesis, University of Calgary, 1–402 (unpublished, 1993).

  4. 4.

    Britt, B. B. Postcranial pneumaticity. In The Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs (eds. Currie P. J. & K. Padian) 590–593 (San Diego, 1997).

  5. 5.

    O’Connor, P. M. & Claessens, L. P. A. M. Basic avian pulmonary design and flowthrough ventilation in nonavian theropod dinosaurs. Nature 436, 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03716 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    O’Connor, P. M. Postcranial pneumaticity: an evaluation of soft-tissue influences on the postcranial skeleton and the reconstruction of pulmonary anatomy in archosaurs. J. Morphol. 267, 1199–1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10470 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    O’Connor, P. M. Evolution of archosaurian body plans: skeletal adaptations of an air-sac-based breathing apparatus in birds and other archosaurs. J. Exp. Zool. A 311A, 629–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.548 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wedel, M. J. Vertebral pneumaticity, air sacs, and the physiology of sauropod dinosaurs. Paleobiology 29, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2003)029%3c0243:VPASAT%3e2.0.CO;2 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wedel, M. J. The evolution of vertebral pneumaticity in sauropod dinosaurs. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 23, 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2003)023[0344:TEOVPI]2.0.CO;2 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wedel, M. J. Origin of postcranial skeletal pneumaticity in dinosaurs. Integr. Zool. 2, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2006.00019.x (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wedel, M. J. Postcranial pneumaticity in dinosaurs and the origin of the avian lung. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1–303 (unpublished, 2007).

  12. 12.

    Gower, D. J. Possible postcranial pneumaticity in the last common ancestor of birds and crocodilians: evidence from Erythrosuchus and other Mesozoic archosaurs. Naturwissenschaften 88, 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140100206 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Butler, R. J., Barrett, P. M. & Gower, D. J. Postcranial skeletal pneumaticity and air-sacs in the earliest pterosaurs. Biol. Lett. 5, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0139 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Butler, R. J., Barrett, P. M. & Gower, D. J. Reassessment of the evidence for postcranial skeletal pneumaticity in Triassic archosaurs, and the early evolution of the avian respiratory system. PLoS ONE 7, e34094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034094 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Claessens, L. P. A. M., O’Connor, P. M. & Unwin, D. M. Respiratory evolution facilitated the origin of pterosaur flight and aerial gigantism. PLoS ONE 4, e4497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004497 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Buchmann, R. & Rodrigues, T. The evolution of pneumatic foramina in pterosaur vertebrae. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 91, e20180782. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201920180782 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Buchmann, R., Avilla, L. S. & Rodrigues, T. Comparative analysis of the vertebral pneumatization in pterosaurs (Reptilia: Pterosauria) and extant birds (Avialae: Neornithes). PLoS ONE 14, e0224165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224165 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Holgado, B. New contributions to pterosaur systematics with emphasis on appendicular pneumaticity. PhD thesis, Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 1–485 (unpublished, 2020).

  19. 19.

    Currey, J. D. & Alexander, R. M. The thickness of the walls of tubular bones. J. Zool. 206, 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb03551.x (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cubo, J. & Casinos, A. Incidence and mechanical significance of pneumatization in the long bones of birds. Zool. J. Linn. Soc-Lond. 130, 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2000.tb02198.x (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wedel, M. J. Postcranial pneumaticity in sauropods and its implications for mass estimates. In The Sauropods: Evolution and Paleobiology (eds Curry-Rogers, K. & Wilson, J. A.) 201–228 (California, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Elgin, R. A. & Hone, D. W. E. Pneumatization of an immature azhdarchoid pterosaur. Cretaceous Res. 45, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2013.06.006 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Martin, E. G. & Palmer, C. Air Space Proportion in pterosaur limb bones using computed tomography and its implications for previous estimates of pneumaticity. PLoS ONE 9, e97159. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097159 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Martin, E. G. & Palmer, C. A novel method of estimating pterosaur skeletal mass using computed tomography scans. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 34, 1466–1469. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2014.859621 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wellnhofer, P. Weitere Pterosaurierfunde aus der Santana-Formation (Apt) der Chapada do Araripe, Brasilien. Palaeontogr. Abt. A 215, 43–101 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pinheiro, F. L. & Rodrigues, T. Anhanguera taxonomy revisited: is our understanding of Santana Group pterosaur diversity biased by poor biological and stratigraphic control?. PeerJ 5, e3285. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3285 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Arai, M. & Assine, M. L. Chronostratigraphic constraints and paleoenvironmental interpretation of the Romualdo Formation (Santana Group, Araripe Basin, Northeastern Brazil) based on palynology. Cretaceous Res. 116, 104610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104610 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Melo, R. M. et al. New marine data and age accuracy of the Romualdo Formation, Araripe Basin, Brazil. Sci. Rep. 10, 15779. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72789-8 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Veldmeijer, A. J., Meijer, H. J. M. & Signore, M. Description of pterosaurian (Pterodactyloidea: Anhangueridae, Brasileodactylus) remains from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Deinsea 13, 9–40 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kellner, A. W. A. Pterosaur phylogeny and comments on the evolutionary history of the group. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 217, 105–137. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.217.01.10 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rodrigues, T. & Kellner, A. W. A. Taxonomic review of the Ornithocheirus complex (Pterosauria) from the Cretaceous of England. ZooKeys 308, 1–112. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.308.5559 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Holgado, B. et al. On a new crested pterodactyloid from the Early Cretaceous of the Iberian Peninsula and the radiation of the clade Anhangueria. Sci. Rep. 9, 4940. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41280-4 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Holgado, B. & Pêgas, R. V. A taxonomic and phylogenetic review of the anhanguerid pterosaur group Coloborhynchinae and the new clade Tropeognathinae. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 65, 743–761. https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00751.2020 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Baumel, J. J. & Witmer, L. M. Osteologia. In Nomina anatomica avium 2 (eds. Baumel, J.J., King, A.S., Breazile, J.E., Evans, H.E. & Vanden Berge, J.C.) 45–132 (1993).

  35. 35.

    Zusi, R. L. Structural adaptations of the head and neck in the Black Skimmer, Rhynchops nigra Linnaeus. Publ. Nuttal Ornithol. Club 3, 1–153 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gutzwiller, S. C., Su, A. & O’Connor, P. M. Postcranial pneumaticity and bone structure in two clades of neognath birds. Anat. Rec. 296, 867–876l. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22691 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Williams, C. J. et al. Helically arranged cross struts in azhdarchid pterosaur cervical vertebrae and their biomechanical implications. iScience 24, 102338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102338 (2021).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kellner, A. W. A. & Tomida, Y. Description of a new species of Anhangueridae (Pterodactyloidea) with comments on the pterosaur fauna from the Santana Formation (Aptian-Albian), Northeastern Brazil. Natl. Sci. Museum Monogr. Tokyo 17, 1–135 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bennett, S. C. The osteology and functional morphology of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon. Palaeontogr. Abt. A 260, 1–112 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Averianov, A. O. The osteology of Azhdarcho lancicollis Nessov, 1984 (Pterosauria, Azhdarchidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan. Proc. Zool. Inst. RAS 314, 264–317 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Vila Nova, B. C., Sayão, J. M., Langer, M. C. & Kellner, A. W. A. Comments on the cervical vertebrae of the Tapejaridae (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea) with description of new specimens. Hist. Biol. 27, 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2015.1007049 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fajardo, R. J., Hernandez, E. & O’Connor, P. M. Postcranial skeletal pneumaticity: a case study in the use of quantitative microCT to assess vertebral structure in birds. J. Anat. 211, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00749.x (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Humphries, S., Bosner, R. H. C., Witton, M. P. & Martill, D. M. Did pterosaurs feed by skimming? Physical modelling and anatomical evaluation of an unusual feeding method. PLoS Biol. 5, 1647–1655. https://doi.org/10.1371/jounal.pbio.0050204 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Molnar, J. L., Pierce, S. E. & Hutchinson, J. R. An experimental and morphometric test of the relationship between vertebral morphology and joint stiffness in Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus). J. Exp. Biol. 217, 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.089904 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Taylor, M. & Wedel, M. Why is vertebral pneumaticity in sauropod dinosaurs so variable?. Qeios 4, 1G6J3Q.4. https://doi.org/10.32388/1G6J3Q.4 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Buchmann, R., Rodrigues, T., Polegario, S. & Kellner, A. W. A. New information on the postcranial skeleton of the Thalassodrominae (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea, Tapejaridae). Hist. Biol. 30, 1139–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1343314 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kellner, A. W. A., Weinschütz, L. C., Holgado, B., Bantim, R. A. & Sayão, J. M. A new toothless pterosaur (Pterodactyloidea) from Southern Brazil with insights into the paleoecology of a Cretaceous desert. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 91(suppl. 2), e20190768. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201920190768 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Moore, A. J. Vertebral pneumaticity is correlated with serial variation in vertebral shape in storks. J. Anat. 238, 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13322 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Dzemski, G. & Christian, A. Flexibility along the neck of the ostrich (Struthio camelus) and consequences for the reconstruction of dinosaurs with extreme neck length. J. Morphol. 268, 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10542 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cobley, M. J., Rayfield, E. J. & Barrett, P. M. Inter-vertebral flexibility of the ostrich neck: implications for estimating sauropod neck flexibility. PLoS ONE 8, e72187. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072187 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Elizabeth Martin-Silverstone and an anonymous reviewer for the comments they provided, which improved this contribution. We are especially grateful for the collaboration of Dr. Oliver Rauhut (SNSB/BSPG), who lent the material for analysis, and Dr. Johannes Müller, who allowed CT scans to be performed at the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany. We thank the Programa de Pós-graduação in Biodiversidade Neotropical (PPGBIO/UNIRIO) and its faculty who allowed us to carry out the project and for the comments on its preliminary version. We thank also Dr. Alexander Kellner (Museu Nacional/UFRJ) and Dr. Dimila Mothé (UNIRIO) for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Alexandra Elbakyan is acknowledged for “breaking the barriers of science”, permitting the access to several articles that would not be possible otherwise. This study was funded in part by stipends from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001 (to RB), Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ #E-26/002.360/2020 to BH), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (#140789/2016-2 to BH; #307555/2016-0 and #306916/2020-7 to LSA; #309666/2019-8 to TR), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior and Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (CAPES/DAAD #3474/09-7 to GS), and by a Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo research grant (FAPES #52986870/2011 to TR). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.B., L.S.A. and T.R. planned the project. G.S. performed the CT scans. R.B. demarcated the air cavities and performed the calculations of A.S.P. R.B., B.H., G.S., L.S.A. and T.R. interpreted the data, wrote and reviewed the paper. R.B. drew and edited the figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Buchmann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buchmann, R., Holgado, B., Sobral, G. et al. Quantitative assessment of the vertebral pneumaticity in an anhanguerid pterosaur using micro-CT scanning. Sci Rep 11, 18718 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97856-6

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing