Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A putatively extinct higher taxon of Spirotrichea (Ciliophora) from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil

Abstract

Fossil microeukaryotes are key elements for understanding ancient ecosystems at microscopic level and improving the knowledge on the diversification of microbial life as a whole. We describe Palaeohypothrix bahiensis gen. et sp. nov., an exceptionally well-preserved Lower Cretaceous (Berriasian–Barremian; 145–125 Mya) amber-entrapped microeukaryote, identified as a spirotrich ciliate. The preservation of structures interpreted as the nuclear apparatus and remains of the ciliature revealed a novel ground plan, not found in modern Spirotrichea, thus representing a putatively extinct higher taxon lineage, viz. the Palaeohypotricha nov. tax. Based on cladistic analysis, the new taxon is hypothesized as phylogenetically related to the Protohypotrichia.

Introduction

The Spirotrichea is a broadly diversified class of intramacronucleate ciliates characterized by having a polyhymenophore adoral zone, complex specialization of the ventral ciliature forming compound cilia (= cirri) in most taxa, and macronuclear DNA replication bands during cell division1. The group encompasses the Discocephalida, Euplota, Hypotricha and Protohypotrichia, often referred to as hypotrichs s. l.2, plus the Licnophoria, Oligotricha, and the monotypic Phacodiniidia, all frequently regarded as higher taxa, but at variable ranks1,3,4,5. Albeit common in freshwater, marine and terrestrial environments worldwide, very little is known on the natural history of the Spirotrichea spanning the fathom of geological time. Recent molecular analysis estimates their origin in the Neoproterozoic, at approximately 850 Mya6, however, known fossil record is mostly restricted to tintinnid oligotrichs, of which unambiguous registry of preserved loricae first appeared in the Jurassic and continue to the Recent7. As the other taxa are formed by soft-bodied unicellular organisms, preservation is largely impaired. To our knowledge, fossils were only reported for euplotids, namely Aspidisca eocenica, Cinetoconia crassa and Ploesconia cycloides (all of which identity have been doubted8) found in Eocene lignite9,10, and one undetermined hypotrich in Cenomanian amber from France11.

Systematic paleontology

Alveolata Cavalier-Smith, 1991

Ciliophora Doflein, 1901

Intramacronucleata Lynn, 1996

Spirotrichea Bütschli, 1889

Palaeohypotricha nov. tax. †

Palaeohypothrix bahiensis gen. et sp. nov.

Etymology

Greek: παλαιός (ancient, old) + hupó (under) + θρίξ (hair). Named for being an ancient hypotrich s. l. ciliate. The species-group name bahiensis refers to the State of Bahia, Brazil, from where the amber was collected.

Holotype

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Geologia, Coleção de Macrofósseis. Accession data: Holotype—UFRJ-DG 762 Pb. No further specimens found.

Stratigraphic horizon and location

Amber from lacustrine Lower Cretaceous (Berriasian–Barremian; 145 to 125 Mya) sandstones, Caruaçu Member, Maracangalha Formation, Recôncavo Basin, Ilha dos Frades, Bahia state, Brazil. Geographic coordinates: 12° 48′ 20.3″ S 38° 37′ 45.0″ W.

Diagnosis

The studied specimen differs from all known modern Spirotrichea for exhibiting the following combination of features: Body 45 × 30 µm, broadly elliptical, dorsoventrally flat about 2:1; contractile vacuole at posterior right quadrant of body; macronuclear DNA replication bands present; adoral zone of membranelles (AZM) distinctly separated in crown and lapel; paroral membrane (hereafter “paroral”) unusually complex, formed by multiple oblique segments adjacent to a long, thick file of cilia bordering a narrow peristome which occupies ca. 63% of body length; fronto-ventral-transverse (FVT) ciliature appearing mostly as anlagen-like brushes formed of tightly packed, roughly paired ciliary units. About four frontal brushes appearing contiguous with lapel adoral membranelles; distal end of paroral connecting with leftmost frontal brushes; two fronto-ventral brushes. About four transverse cirri-like structures as a row parallel to body length; left marginal ciliature formed of about ten oblique brushes of outwards decreasing length; right marginal ciliature as a cirral row; dorsal ribs present (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4).

Figure 1
figure 1

Morphology of Palaeohypothrix bahiensis gen. et sp. nov. (a) Photograph of holotype (ufrjdg762pb0d0019.png in Supplementary Data 1) showing remains of the nuclear apparatus. (b) Composition assembled from parts of volumetric reconstruction sections where the external amber layer could be virtually removed from the ventral side, showing presumed remains of ciliature elements and contractile vacuole. The dot shows darkened area where part of the anterior macronuclear nodule is seen by transparency; asterisks mark short ciliary brushes right of left marginal ciliature and arrowheads show spots with undetermined surface structures. c. Volumetric reconstruction of dorsal side with external amber layer removed, showing dorsal ribs (asterisks) and attachment sites of crown membranelles (arrowheads). (d,e) Interpretative reconstruction of live specimen depicting the ventral side; structures marked in (e). Legends: AZM adoral zone of membranelles, CV contractile vacuole, F frontal ciliary structures, FV fronto-ventral ciliary structures, LM left marginal ciliature, Ma macronuclear nodule, Mi micronucleus, P paroral membrane, RB vestige of macronuclear DNA replication band, RM right marginal ciliature, TC transverse cirri-like structures. Scale bars = 20 µm.

Figure 2
figure 2

Light microscopy photographs (a,c,h) and volumetric reconstructions (b,d,e–g,i) of Palaeohypothrix bahiensis gen. et sp. nov. holotype. (a) Z-stack of photographs to compose the entire ventral surface. Ventral side. (b) Right side to show presumed contractile vacuole. (c,d) Detail of nuclear apparatus; bottom right inset in c. to show slightly different focal plane. (c) Ventral view. (d) Right lateral view assembled from two longitudinal sections to show both macronuclear nodules, circumscribed by dotted line. (e) Ventrolateral view to show the adoral zone of membranelles; figure inset shows detail of one lapel membranelle. Asterisk marks oral cavity; black and white arrowheads point to distal and proximal ends of lapel adoral zone, respectively (same in f). (f) A ventral focal plane under simulated oblique illumination. (g) Transversal section showing oral cavity (asterisk). (h,i) Detail of paroral. (h) Bright field photograph. (i) Simulated oblique illumination. Arrowhead shows insertion pits of frontal brushes; asterisks mark ciliary brushes which compose the paroral. Legends: AZM adoral zone of membranelles, Ch vestige of chromatin condensation, CV contractile vacuole, F frontal ciliary structures, FV fronto-ventral ciliary structures, LM left marginal ciliature, Ma macronuclear nodule, Mi micronucleus, P paroral membrane, RM right marginal ciliature. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Figure 3
figure 3

Light microscopy photograph (a) and volumetric reconstructions (b–j) of Palaeohypothrix bahiensis gen. et sp. nov. holotype. (a) Ventral side to show the transverse cirri-like structures (also in i,j) outlined. Arrowhead points to one of said structures. (b) Anterior region of body showing crown membranelles (arrowheads) and one intermembranellar ridge (asterisk). (c) Detail of right quadrant of peristome. Figure inset shows some insertion pores of ciliary structures forming the frontal brush immediately ahead of paroral. (d–f) Different focal planes of the anterior region to show frontal ciliature. Arrowheads indicate pits from where putative ciliary structures emerged. (g) Right lateral view. (h) Focal plane of the anterior region to show remnants of the frontal and fronto-ventral ciliature elements. Arrowhead shows insertion places of ciliary structures. (i,j) Insertion pits (i) and remnants of transverse cirri-like structures. Legends: AZM adoral zone of membranelles, CV contractile vacuole, F frontal ciliary structures, FV fronto-ventral ciliary structures, P paroral membrane, TC(?) possible transverse cirri-like structures. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Figure 4
figure 4

Volumetric reconstructions of Palaeohypothrix bahiensis gen. et sp. nov. holotype. (a) Posterior right quadrant of body showing undetermined surface structures (arrowheads) and part of the two ciliary brushes located between transverse cirri-like structures and left marginal ciliary brushes (asterisks). (b) Transversal section showing insertion of transverse cirri-like structures and left marginal ciliary brushes. (c) Insertion pores of left marginal ciliary elements (arrowhead). (d) Remnants of left marginal ciliature. Asterisks mark two ciliary brushes located between transverse cirri-like structures and left marginal rows set. (e) Detail of right margin of body. Black asterisks show putative marginal cirri; white asterisk shows supposed pellicular pores. Arrowhead points to rightmost ventral brush. (f) Dorsal side with arrowhead pointing to cortical ribs. Legends: CV contractile vacuole, LM left marginal ciliature, RM right marginal ciliature, TC transverse cirri-like structures.

Remarks

As yet Palaeohypothrix is monotypic, therefore genus diagnosis is the same as for the type species P. bahiensis, and ditto that of Palaeohypotricha nov. tax., of which etymology borrows of the genus. The adopted name termination implies no formal Linnaean category12, but is meant to approximate subclass level.

Morphology of the holotype

Possibly limnetic or terrestrial hypotrich s. l. Spirotrichea; body 45 × 30 µm, broad elliptical outline, narrowed anteriorly and slightly truncated at posterior end, dorsoventrally flat about 2:1, ventral surface roughly plane; dorsal convex (Fig. 1a–e). Surface (pellicle remnants?) apparently with numerous pores and undetermined structures; suggestive of extrusomes (Figs. 1b, 4e). Supposed contractile vacuole behind equatorial level of body, near right margin, with ventral overture (Figs. 1b,c, 2a,b, 4a).

Nuclear apparatus along midbody, composed of two roughly globular macronuclear nodules with supposed vestiges of chromatin condensations and discoid DNA replication bands. Anterior nodule 9.5 × 8.0 µm, 13.5 µm away from anterior end of body; posterior one 9.5 × 7.5 µm, ca. 2 µm away from the anterior nodule. At least one, ca. 1.5 µm in cross section, globular micronucleus attached to each macronuclear nodule (Figs. 1a, 2c,d).

Peristome occupying ca. 63% of body length; lapel and crown of AZM distinctly separated. Lapel falcate, containing ca. 35 membranelles; crown with about ten membranelles separate by inconspicuous ridges, possibly slightly overhanging lapel. Proximal lapel membranelles apparently sheathed in infundibulum; oral cavity narrow (Figs. 1b, 2a,e–g). Bases of widest membranelles about 7.5 µm wide. Putative paroral unusually complex, because formed by multiple oblique segments, adjacent to a long, thick (polystichomonad?) file of cilia adjacent to peristome border. Distal region of paroral appearing contiguous with leftmost frontal ciliature. Typical endoral membrane not recognized (Figs. 1b, 2f–i, 3b,c).

Fronto-ventral-transverse ciliature rather particular, because formed by ciliary units (indeterminable whether ordinary cilia or thin cirri) emerging from minute pits, roughly paired, arranged in tight rows resembling brushes (apparently anlagen-like; see Supplementary Discussion); exact number of ciliary units per row not determined (Figs. 1b, 2a, 3a,c–f). Frontal ciliature formed by apparently four of said brushes. Leftmost brushes (possibly three) hardly separable, appearing as a continuation of distal end of AZM lapel, possibly also connected posteriorly with paroral. Right frontal brush (i.e., fourth one) terminates at about the level of leftwards preceding frontal brush (Figs. 1b, 2i, 3c–f). Ventral region with two ciliary brushes: Leftmost one extending almost to body equator, wider anteriad, becomes thinner and composed of more spaced ciliary units towards distal end; right ventral brush running adjacent to left marginal row, possibly terminating slightly above the level of contractile vacuole (Figs. 2a, 3a,g,h, 4a).

At least four (five?) strong, transverse cirri-like structures emerging from conspicuous elongate, oblique pits longitudinally aligned below equatorial region of body, slightly displaced rightwards (Figs. 1b, 3g,i,j, 4b). Some undetermined surface structures present in the space between transverse cirri-like row and left marginal brush set (Figs. 1b, 4a). Left marginal ciliature with about ten ciliary brushes of decreasing length outwards, inserted in shallow furrows; outermost ones slightly oblique (Figs. 1b, 2a,f, 4e). One right marginal row, likely formed by cirri (Figs. 1b, 2a, 4b–d). Two short ciliary brushes (perhaps ventrally located caudal cirri-like structures) between transverse cirri-like structures and left marginal ciliature (Figs. 1b, 4a,d). Dorsal side with at least seven narrow cortical ribs slightly pronounced at anterior region of body, disappearing towards equatorial region of body (Figs. 1c, 4d). Dorsal ciliature not preserved. A tentative reconstruction of the live specimen is provided as Fig. 1d,e.

Identification as a spirotrich ciliate

At first glance, the specimen roughly resembles a palynomorph because of its outline and size. However, this is readily refuted as one perceives the structures herein interpreted as remains of the nuclear apparatus (of which the anterior macronuclear nodule is the most evident) and of the AZM; both appearing concordant with “polyhymenophore” ciliates in shape and topology.

We identified the studied specimen as a spirotrich ciliate because it has both macro- and micronuclei (i.e., nuclear dualism), with morphological vestiges of discoid DNA replication bands in the macronuclear nodules. The former is a time-honored synapomorphy of the Ciliophora, and the latter of the Spirotrichea1,13. Moreover, the dorsoventrally flat body with putative remains of specialized ciliature concentrated on the ventral side, all indicate the specimen belongs to the hypotrichs s. l.2.

Among such structures, the nuclear apparatus is sometimes found in amber fossilized ciliates14,15,16, thus its preservation is not surprising. The DNA replication bands appear as conspicuous morphological features of the macronucleus in most spirotrichs, and are often easily visible under the light microscope even without the need of stain techniques (e.g., see Fig. 2 in Paiva et al.17). Hence, replication bands vestiges in fossilized macronuclear nodules are foreseeable, even though preservation of actual ancient DNA content is unlikely. Remarkably, recent findings, accompanied by experimental taphonomy results, suggest that fossilization of microeukaryote nuclei is more common than previously thought to be possible18,19. On the other hand, preservation of ciliary structures seems rare, as they tend degrade during resin embedding14, even though structures interpreted as flagella were found in inclusions identified as fossilized flagellates16,20.

Comparison with related taxa

When compared to the main higher taxa of hypotrichs s. l. (viz., Discocephalida, Euplota, Hypotricha and Protohypotrichia), the absence of a prominent cephalization and the rightwards vertically aligned transverse cirri-like structures (vs. horizontally) likely exclude placement among the discocephalids21,22. Considering the remaining taxa, macronuclear DNA replication bands were not reported in protohypotrichs2, but regardless, the studied specimen presents notable protohypotrich features, as discussed further below. The nuclear apparatus composed of two ellipsoid nodules, associated with at least one small micronucleus is a recurrent feature among hypotrichs, and notably frequent in the “oxytrichids”, now assigned to the Postoralida12. On the other hand, the oral apparatus in the studied specimen is mostly reminiscent of the euplotids because of its large peristome to body length ratio and the presence of a multi rowed paroral membrane, which only barely resembles an euplotid polystichomonad pattern. In regard to this, the paroral configuration is worthy of attention for its uniqueness among the Spirotrichea. It represents a derived form due to its high complexity in relation not only to modern spirotrichs21,23,24,25, but also to the SAL supergroup, to where they belong26. Another possibility which cannot be disregarded is that the multiple oblique fragments interpreted as part of the paroral do not belong to such structure, but could actually be homologous to the buccal cirri of modern hypotrichs3,27,28,29. The absence of the endoral membrane, although not confirmed, is another common feature in euplotids, except for the diophryines3,30. However, the right portion of the complex paroral structure could be an atypical endoral. Unfortunately, shedding light on such matters would require investigation of ontogenetic processes.

Many euplotids and some protohypotrichs typically have the contractile vacuole positioned in the right side of body, below the equatorial region, as in the present specimen31,32. Conversely, in hypotrichs such vacuole(s) is(are) usually positioned along the left side of body3,27,28,29. The contractile vacuole in the present specimen was interpreted as such due to its position matching with those of euplotids, including the ventral overture. It cannot be excluded, however, that said structure is a cytoproct preserved during excretion. Anyhow, a fecal pellet was not found anywhere near the specimen, thus such interpretation is less favored.

The ventral ciliary pattern of the studied specimen has a unique feature among the Spirotrichea: Its basic organization displaying brushes of ciliary units at specific regions. Such pattern, and the connection of the paroral to the frontal brushes, are all reminiscent of the proter fronto-ventral-transverse (FVT) anlagen set of some modern hypotrichs, as developing during middle stage morphogenesis33,34,35. However, overall evidence seems to favor the interpretation of the specimen as a morphostatic cell: While the macronuclear replication bands indicate at least a very early stage of divisional morphogenesis, the absence of opisthe stomatogenesis (which normally precedes visible FVT anlagen differentiation)27,36 demonstrates the ciliature was still morphostatic when the ciliate was entrapped by the resin. It is worth to mention that we cannot completely exclude the possibility of the structures interpreted as the left marginal brushes being the oral anlage of the opisthe. However, the ciliary brushes and their insertion furrows can be distinguished, at least partially, either by direct observation under bright field or after reconstructions, and they appear different from typical euplotid (subsurface) or hypotrich (surface) opisthe oral anlage.

Physiological reorganization could also explain proter-like FVT anlagen, but it is overruled because macronuclear replication bands are uncommon during that process37. Therefore, a suitable explanation for the curious ventral ciliature pattern of the studied specimen could be neoteny, because it exhibits anlage-like organization of most structures in a morphostatic, mature cell. Said pattern is, perhaps, comparable to that of the protohypotrich Kiitricha marina, in which anlagen segregation into cirri is belated, occurring after cytokinesis2. However, contrarily to that species, the juvenile pattern of the ciliature in P. bahiensis was retained during interphase, to the point it was still present when the macronuclear replication bands appeared—hence the neoteny. Lastly regarding the FVT ciliature, the longitudinal alignment of the transverse cirri-like structures is also reminiscent of protohypotrichs2,31,38,39,40,41. Noteworthy, we observed some undetermined structures on the ventral surface, in the space between the transverse cirri-like structures and the left marginal brushes. Although suggestive of remains of scattered ciliary elements or perhaps extrusomes, they did not conform with the criteria used to discern actual anatomic features from artifacts (see “Methods”). Therefore, were not included in the live specimen reconstruction presented in Fig. 1d,e.

The presence of ciliary rows on both right and left body margins is consistent with all hypotrich s. l. groups, except euplotids, which normally lack the right marginal and display reduced number of left marginal cirri1,32. In protohypotrichs, possible right marginal cirri are not distinguishable from ventral ones, and the left marginal cirri are not ontogenetically homologous to those of the other groups2. Nevertheless, the arrangement of the left marginal ciliature of the studied specimen as brushes is also unique among hypotrichs s. l.

Dorsally, the specimen has cortical ribs, indicating it had a rigid pellicle. Cortical ribs are common in various euplotids42,43, but not in hypotrichs, albeit exceptions occur, such as in Hemiholosticha kahli44. It is worthy of note that the posterior shortening of dorsal ribs could be an artifact of preservation in the studied specimen, therefore, should not be over interpreted.

Although comparable fossil hypotrichs s. l. are presently unknown, a last common ancestor of the Hypotricha was hypothesized by Berger3 as resembling a typical non-dorsomarginalian 18-FVT cirri Hypotricha, thus being remarkably different from P. bahiensis.

Phylogenetic position and systematic implications to the Spirotrichea

A cladistic analysis of combined morphological and molecular characters (Supplementary Materials and Supplementary Data 2) resulted in one optimal cladogram (Fig. 5; Supplementary Fig. S1) in which the inclusion/exclusion of P. bahiensis from the analysis did not alter the resulting topology. The phylogenetic pattern is largely in agreement with previous studies, considering that the position and sometimes the monophyly of the main taxa vary slightly4,5,45. The placement of P. bahiensis (and consequently of the Palaeohypotricha) as sister of the marine Protohypotrichia is sustained by two morphological synapomorphies, namely: (i) the rightwards inclination of transverse cirri, tending to be verticalized—a pattern which also evolved independently in some euplotids, such as Aspidisca32; and (ii) persistence of ventral ciliature elements as anlagen-like structures after cytokinesis. The latter is transient in Protohypotrichia, since the all FVT anlagen eventually differentiate into cirri as postdividers maturate2,39. However, in P. bahiensis the fronto-ventral and the whole left marginal ciliature were retained as anlagen-like structures during interphase, because they occur concomitantly with the macronuclear replication bands. Hence, such ciliary structures are possibly neotenic. Traits such as (i) the complex arrangement of the paroral and its connection with the left most elements of the frontal ciliature; (ii) the continuity of the adoral membranelles of the lapel with the frontal ciliature; and (iii) the permanence of fronto-ventral and left marginal ciliary elements in anlage-like brushes during interphase are thus considered autapomorphies of P. bahiensis, and possible synapomorphies of Palaeohypotricha nov. tax. These are clearly ground plan defining traits not found in the more than 1300 known species of hypotrichs s. l.46,47, hence warranting the taxonomic acts herein established and the reasonable assumption of Palaeohypotricha as a putatively extinct ciliate higher taxon lineage.

Figure 5
figure 5

Simplified cladogram of the Spirotrichea showing resolution at higher taxa nodes, including the putatively extinct Palaeohypotricha nov. tax. Score (k = 4.765625) 189.07802; consistency index (CI) = 0.44; retention index (RI) = 0.51. The hypotrichs s. l. branches are shaded in red. Numbers above and below branches are symmetric resampling GC frequencies and Bremmer support values, respectively. Branches without numbering are monotypic. Outgroup omitted. Illustrative figures from top to bottom (modified from original sources listed in Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Materials): Licnophora lyngbycola (~ 150 µm); Phacodinium metchnikoffi (~ 100 µm); Palaeohypothrix bahiensis (~ 45 µm); Kiitricha marina (~ 100 µm); Euplotes aediculatus (~ 128 µm); Discocephalus ehrenbergi (~ 110 µm); Holosticha heterofoissneri (~ 141 µm); Propecingulum fistoleramalliei (~ 55 µm).

Methods

Geological and paleobotanical context

The fossil analysed in this study is an amber inclusion found in fine sandstones of the Maracangalha Formation from the Recôncavo Basin (Frade Island, Bahia state), Northeastern Brazil. This lithostratigraphic unit was deposited in the geological context of Gondwana break up and first stages of Atlantic Ocean opening48. The depositional environments were under gravitational flows during the syn-rift phase of the Recôncavo Basin. The sediments of Maracangalha Formation are fine sandstones, siltstones and laminated mudstones with deformational structures attributed to the gravitational flows49. This lithostratigraphic unit is subdivided in the Caruaçu and Pitanga members. The amber samples came from fine sandstones and shales of the Caruaçu Member, considered as Berriasian–Barremian age, in a time interval of 145–125 Mya50,51. The sedimentary succession of the Caruaçu Member is interpreted as channel-fill, proximal levee facies and sheet sands in a deltaic complex of a lacustrine environment49.

The paleobotanical affinity of this amber based on the record of fossil plants and pollen is difficult, as hitherto there are no well documented studies on paleobotany on the Caruaçu Member. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis from the extracts of this amber identified alkylbenzenes, alkylnaphtalenes, alkylhydronaphtalenes, parafins, phenols, carboxylic acids and terpenoids52. Based on biomarkers as fenchone, camphor, 16, 17, 19-trisnorabieta-8, 11, 13-triene and methyl 16, 17- bisnordehydroabietate, the botanical origin should be related to Araucariaceae52. Therefore, later studies on the chemical composition of this amber50,53 indicated that there are phyllocladanes and kauranes, also chemosystematic markers of other plant families besides Araucariaceae. The original resins could also be produced by plants from the Cupressaceae or Podocarpaceae families, but excludes Pinaceae. As triterpenoid compounds were not found, most angiosperms are not to be considered as the source of the resin.

Preservation quality of microscopic eukaryotes in amber may vary depending on the botanical origin of resin14, but other factors, in special temperature when embedded, appear to be determinant in structural preservation54. The resin in which the studied specimen was embedded stained the cellular structures we interpreted as the remains of nuclear apparatus and ciliature elements in the fashion of a faint protargol preparation—a rare event, herein reported for the first time in a ciliate amber inclusion.

Morphology and taxonomy

Amber fragments of roughly 1 cm3 were cut in slices of about the thickness of a typical microscope glass slide and polished on both sides. Four slices were then searched for inclusions suggestive of microeukaryotes. To do so, the slides were covered with a water droplet to reduce the mirror effect caused by microscopic irregularities and cracks, and a coverslip for observation under the light microscope. We measured and photographed the studied specimen under bright field, 1.000 × (oil immersion), on various focal planes, based on which volume reconstructions were performed with Volume Viewer 2.01 plugin in Fiji55, using z-aspect of 2.0, varying alpha offsets, with and without oblique illumination. When applying the oblique illumination effect, presumed vestiges of ciliary structures appeared as cloudy masses at different focal planes. To discern from potential artifacts, we considered valid only those structures which (i) could be detected from different angles and were traceable through focal planes; (ii) were consistent with observations made under bright field; and (iii) homology with modern ciliates could be determined. The photographs used to make volume reconstructions are available as Supplementary Data 1. An interpretative reconstruction of the live specimen was made based on our observations of the fossil structures and comparison with related modern organisms.

Terminology of spirotrich ciliate morphology is basically according to Berger3,28 and systematics above subclass level follows Lynn1. Given the potentially misleading effect of excessive scale bars when fixation shrinkage and other preparation artifacts alter the actual size of cell structures in modern ciliates56, we limited the use of scale bars to avoid informing false precision due to size distortions after volume reconstruction, preferring to provide measurement values of taxonomically relevant structures in the main text.

Cladistic analysis

Taxon sample contained species representing the Spirotrichea higher taxa, plus two species of Blepharisma (Heterotrichea) as outgroup, totalizing 29 terminals with P. bahiensis included (Supplementary Materials, Supplementary Table S1). We analysed a matrix of 26 morphological characters combined with the 18S rDNA (of modern species). Morphological characters were proposed as statements57, of which primary homologies rely on the interpretation of the studied specimen as a spirotrich ciliate. Characters were coded as either binary or multistate, treated as unordered. Issues of non-applicable character states were resolved via contingent coding58,59. The 18S matrix was aligned through the MUSCLE algorithm implemented in MEGA X60, and refined manually to minimize changes among nucleotides; leading and trailing gaps coded as missing data.

A cladistic analysis was performed in TNT 1.561 with parsimony uninformative characters disabled and gaps treated as a fifth base. We analysed the combined matrix under extended implied weights regime62, selecting the value of Goloboff´s concavity constant k with the setk.run script written by Salvador Arias63. To search for optimal cladograms, we employed a combination of parsimony-ratchet, tree-drifting, tree-fusing and sectorial search routines64,65. Clade support was evaluated via 1000 symmetric resamples, expressed as GC frequencies (a metric which ranges from − 100 to 100), for which values < 0 were considered unreliable66,67, and the traditional Bremer index68,69, given in fit units to ensure consistency with analysis optimality criterion. Moreover, the ensemble consistency (CI) and retention (RI) indexes were calculated to measure character logical consistency and synapomorphy retention onto the tree, respectively58. Root placement was made a posteriori70. The analysed matrix is provided as a TNT formatted file (Supplementary Data 2).

Data availability

The analysed data used in this study are available as part of the Article and Supplementary Materials. The new genus and species in publication have been registered at ZooBank (LSID: D98CA5A2-B5B4-4264-B703-1EDE1EFF22BF).

References

  1. Lynn, D. H. The Ciliated Protozoa: Characterization, Classification, and Guide to the Literature (Springer Netherlands, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shao, C., Song, W., Warren, A. & Al-Rasheid, K. A. Morphogenesis of Kiitricha marina Nozawa, 1941 (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea), a possible model for the ancestor of hypotrichs s. l. Eur. J. Protistol. 45, 292–304 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, H. Monograph of the Amphisiellidae and Trachelostylidae (Ciliophora, Hypotricha). Monogr. Biol. 88, 1–737 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miao, M., Shao, C., Chen, X. & Song, W. Evolution of discocephalid ciliates: Molecular, morphological and ontogenetic data support a sister group of discocephalids and pseudoamphisiellids (Protozoa, Ciliophora) with establishment of a new suborder Pseudoamphisiellina subord. n. Sci. China Life Sci. 54, 634–641 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao, F. et al. The all-data-based evolutionary hypothesis of ciliated protists with a revised classification of the Phylum Ciliophora (Eukaryota, Alveolata). Sci. Rep. 6, 1–14 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandes, N. M. & Schrago, C. G. A multigene timescale and diversification dynamics of Ciliophora evolution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 139, 106521 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunthorn, M. et al. Ciliates—Protists with complex morphologies and ambiguous early fossil record. Mar. Micropaleontol. 119, 1–6 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deflandre, G. & Deunff, J. Sur la présence de cilies fossiles de la famille des Folliculinidae dans un silex du Gabon. C. R. hehd. Skunc. Acud. Sci. Paris 244, 3090–3093 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Renault, B. & Roche, A. Etude sur la constitution des lignites et les organismes qu’ils renferment suivie d’une note preliminaire sur les schistes lignitiféres de Menat et du Bois-d’Asson. Bull. Soc. Hist. nut. Autun. 11, 201–239 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Renault, B. Sur quelques nouveaux infusoires fossiles. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nut. Autun. 16, 25–27 (1903).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Girard, V. Microcénoses des ambres médio-crétacés français. Taphonomie, systématique, paléoécologie et reconstitution du paléoenvironnement. (Université Rennes 1, 2008).

  12. da Silva Paiva, T. Systematic redefinition of the Hypotricha (Alveolata, Ciliophora) based on combined analyses of morphological and molecular characters. Protist 171, 125755 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Raikov, I. B. Nuclei of ciliates. In Ciliates: Cells as Organisms (eds. Hausmann, K & Bradbury, P. C.) 221–242 (Fischer Verlag, 1996).

  14. Foissner, W., Schönborn, W., Wright, A.-D. G. & Lynn, D. H. Further studies on fossilised ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from triassic amber. In 5-th Central European Workshop on Soil Zoology (eds. Tajovský, V. & Pižl, K.) (ISB AS CR, 1999).

  15. Schönborn, W., Dörfelt, H., Foissner, W., Krienitz, L. & Schäfer, U. A fossilized microcenosis in triassic amber. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 46, 571–584 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martín-González, A., Wierzchos, J., Gutiérrez, J. C., Alonso, J. & Ascaso, C. Double fossilization in eukaryotic microorganisms from Lower Cretaceous amber. BMC Biol. 7, 1–11 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. da Silva Paiva, T., Dias, R. J. P. & da Silva-Neto, I. D. Redescription of the little-known ciliate Apoamphisiella vernalis (Stokes, 1887) Berger, 2006 (Ciliophora, Hypotricha) from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 61, 561–568 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, W. et al. Nucleus preservation in early Ediacaran Weng’an embryo-like fossils, experimental taphonomy of nuclei and implications for reading the eukaryote fossil record. Interface Focus 10, 20200015 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carlisle, E. M., Jobbins, M., Pankhania, V., Cunningham, J. A. & Donoghue, P. C. J. Experimental taphonomy of organelles and the fossil record of early eukaryote evolution. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9487 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martín-González, A., Wierzchos, J., Gutiérrez, J. C., Alonso, J. & Ascaso, C. Microbial cretaceous park: Biodiversity of microbial fossils entrapped in amber. Naturwissenschaften 96, 551–564 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wicklow, B. J. The Discocephalina (n. subord): Ultrastructure, morphogenesis and evolutionary implications of a group of endemic marine interstitial hypotrichs (Ciliophora, Protozoa). Protistologica 18, 299–330 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, X., Song, W. & Warren, A. Redescription of the rare marine ciliate, Prodiscocephalus borrori (Wicklow, 1982) from shrimp-culturing waters near Qingdao, China, with redefinitions of the genera Discocephalus, Prodiscocephalus and Marginotricha (Ciliophora, Hypotrichida, Discocephali. Eur. J. Protistol. 40, 137–146 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fernandez-Leborans, G. The paroral formation of various hypotrichous ciliates. Arch. für Protistenkd. 130, 367–380 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. da Silva Neto, I. D. Structural and ultrastructural observations of the ciliate Phacodinium metchnicoffi certes, 1891 (Heterotrichea, Phacodiniida). Eur. J. Protistol. 29, 209–218 (1993).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. da Silva-Neto, I. D., da Silva Paiva, T., Dias, R. J. P., Campos, C. J. A. & Migotto, A. E. Redescription of Licnophora chattoni Villeneuve-Brachon, 1939 (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea), associated with Zyzzyzus warreni Calder, 1988 (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa). Eur. J. Protistol. 48, 48–62 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rotterová, J. et al. Genomics of new ciliate lineages provides insight into the evolution of obligate anaerobiosis. Curr. Biol. 30, 2037-2050.e6 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Berger, H. Monograph of the Oxytrichidae (Ciliophora, Hypotrichia). Monogr. Biol. 78, 1–1080 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Berger, H. Monograph of the Urostyloidea (Ciliophora, Hypotricha). Monogr. Biol. 85, 1–1304 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Berger, H. Monograph of the Gonostomatidae and Kahliellidae (Ciliophora, Hypotricha). Monogr. Biol. 90, 1–741 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Song, W. et al. Redescriptions of two marine hypotrichous ciliates, Diophrys irmgard and D. hystrix (Ciliophora, Euplotida), with a brief revision of the genus Diophrys. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 54, 283–296 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Miao, M. et al. Caryotricha minuta (Xu et al., 2008) nov. comb, a unique marine ciliate (Protista, Ciliophora, Spirotrichea), with phylogenetic analysis of the ambiguous genus Caryotricha inferred from the small-subunit rRNA gene sequence. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59, 430–438 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Song, W., Warren, A. & Hu, X. Free-Living Ciliates in the Bohai and Yellow Seas, China (Science Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Foissner, W., Adam, H. & Foissner, I. Morphologie und Infraciliatur von Bryometopus pseudochilodon Kahl, 1932, Balantidioides dragescoi nov. spec. und Kahliella marina nov. spec. und Revision des Genus Balantidioides Pernard, 1930 (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Protistologica 18, 211–225 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hu, X. & Song, W. Redescription of the morphology and divisional morphogenesis of the marine hypotrich Pseudokahliella marina (Foissner et al., 1982) from scallop-culture water of North China. J. Nat. Hist. 37, 2033–2043 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. da Silva Paiva, T. & da Silva-Neto, I. D. Morphology and divisional morphogenesis of Nudiamphisiella interrupta Foissner, Agatha & Berger, 2002 (Ciliophora: Stichotrichia) based on a Brazilian strain. Eur. J. Protistol. 45, 271–280 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tuffrau, M., Fleury, A. Classe des Hypotrichea Stein, 1859. In Traité de Zoologie. Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie, Vol. II Infusoires Ciliés, Fasc. 2 Systématique (ed. De Puytorac, P.) 83–151 (Masson, 1994).

  37. Zou, S. F. & Ng, S. F. Physiological reorganization and post-traumatic regeneration in Stylonychia mytilus: Reflections on developmental constraints and the evolutionary origin of alternative modes of asexual morphogenesis. J. Protozool. 38, 182–192 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu, K., Lei, Y. & Choi, J. K. Kiitricha minuta n. sp., a peculiar hypotrichous ciliate (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea) from the Yellow Sea. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 55, 201–206 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, L. et al. Does Kiitricha (Protista, Ciliophora, Spirotrichea) belong to Euplotida or represent a primordial spirotrichous taxon? With suggestion to establish a new subclass Protohypotrichia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59, 439–446 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jiang, J. et al. Two new marine ciliates, Caryotricha rariseta n. sp. and Discocephalus pararotatorius n. sp. (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea), with phylogenetic analyses inferred from the small subunit rRNA gene sequences. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 60, 388–398 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lian, C., Luo, X., Warren, A., Zhao, Y. & Jiang, J. Morphology and phylogeny of four marine or brackish water spirotrich ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from China, with descriptions of two new species. Eur. J. Protistol. 72, 125663 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Curds, C. R. A guide to the species of the genus Euplotes (Hypotrichida, Ciliatea). Bull. Br. Mus. 28, 1–73 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Foissner, W., Blatterer, H., Berger, H., Kohmann, F. Taxonomische und ökologische Revision der Ciliaten des Saprobiensystems—Band I: Cyrtophorida, Oligotrichida, Hypotrichia, Colpodea.—Informationsberichte Bayer. (Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft, 1991).

  44. Luo, X., Huang, J. A., Li, L., Song, W. & Bourland, W. A. Phylogeny of the ciliate family Psilotrichidae (Protista, Ciliophora), a curious and poorly-known taxon, with notes on two algae-bearing psilotrichids from Guam, USA. BMC Evol. Biol. 19, 1–15 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Irwin, N. A. T. et al. The function and evolution of motile DNA replication systems in ciliates. Curr. Biol. 31, 66-76.e6 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Berger, H. Catalogue of Ciliate Names. I. Hypotrichs (Verlag Helmut Berger, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Berger, H. Bibliography of Hypotrichs and Euplotids(Ciliophora) (Verlag Helmut Berger, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mohriak, W. U. Bacias Sedimentares da Margem Continental Brasileira. In Geologia, Tectônica e Recursos Minerais do Brasil. (eds. Bizzi, L. A. et al.) 87–165 (CPRM, 2003).

  49. Falcão, L. C. & Della Favera, J. C. D. Sublacustrine channel-levee system of the Caruaçu member, southwest, Recôncavo Basin, Bahia, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Geociências 42, 539–546 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pereira, R., de Carvalho, I. S., Simoneit, B. R. T. & de Azevedo, D. A. Molecular composition and chemosystematic aspects of Cretaceous amber from the Amazonas, Araripe and Recôncavo basins, Brazil. Org. Geochem. 40, 863–875 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Silva, O. B., Caixeta, J. M., Milhomem, P. S. & Kosin, M. D. Bacia do Recôncavo. Bol. Geociências da Petrobras 15, 423–431 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pereira, R., de Carvalho, I. S. & de Azevedo, D. A. Terpenoid composition of Cretaceous ambers from Amazonas, Araripe and Recôncavo basins, Brazil. In 10th ALAGO Congress on Organic Geochemistry 153–155 (2006).

  53. Pereira, R., de Carvalho, I. S., de Azevedo, D. A. & Fernandes, A. C. S. Ocorrência de âmbar nas bacias sedimentares brasileiras—Uma revisão. In Paleontologia: Cenários de Vida 2 (eds. Carvalho, I. S. et al.) 251–259 (Interciência, 2007).

  54. Girard, V. & Adl, S. Sensitivity of protists to preservation in plant resins for fossil formation into amber. Protistology 7, 90–96 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Foissner, W. & Xu, K. Monograph of the Spathidiida (Ciliophora, Haptoria) Vol I: Protospathidiidae, Arcuospathidiidae, Apertospathulidae. Monogr. Biol. 81, 1–485 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sereno, P. C. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics 23, 565–587 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kitching, I. J., Forey, P. L., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, D. M. Cladistics. The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis. The Systematics Association Publication No. II (Oxford University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Forey, P. L., Kitching, I. J. Experiments in coding multistate characters. In Homology and Systematics. Special Volume Series 58 (ed. Scotland, R., P. R. T.) 54–89 (Systematics Association, 2000).

  60. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Goloboff, P. A. & Catalano, S. A. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32, 221–238 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Goloboff, P. A. Extended implied weighting. Cladistics 30, 260–272 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Goloboff, P. A., Carpenter, J. M., Arias, J. S. & Esquivel, D. R. M. Weighting against homoplasy improves phylogenetic analysis of morphological data sets. Cladistics 24, 758–773 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Goloboff, P. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: Solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 15, 415–428 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nixon, K. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15, 407–414 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Goloboff, P. Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics 19, 324–332 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kitching, I. J., Lorna Culverwell, C. & Harbach, R. E. The phylogenetic conundrum of Lutzia (Diptera: Culicidae: Culicini): a cautionary account of conflict and support. Insect Syst. Evol. 46, 269–290 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bremer, K. The Limits of Amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution (N. Y.). 42, 795 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Bremer, K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295–304 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Nixon, K. C. & Carpenter, J. M. On Outgroups. Cladistics 9, 413–426 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Flávia Alessandra da Silva Figueiredo and Penélope Saliveros Bosio for the access to the Macrofossil Collection of Departamento de Geologia—UFRJ; to Kelly Cristine Costa de Abreu for her technical support; Leonardo Borghi (Lagesed, Departamento de Geologia—UFRJ) for providing information on the location of the amber outcrop; and to Bárbara do Nascimento Borges for proofreading this manuscript. This study was financed by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq): Grants 437655/2018-0 (T.S.P.) and 303596/2016-3 (I.S.C.); and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ): Grant E-26/202.910/2017 (I.S.C.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.S.P. conducted microscopy observations and digital reconstructions, made the illustrations, assembled the morphological and molecular matrix and performed the cladistic analysis; I.S.C. collected and processed the amber samples. Both authors delineated the study, interpreted the data, discussed the results, wrote and revised the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thiago da Silva Paiva.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva Paiva, T., de Souza Carvalho, I. A putatively extinct higher taxon of Spirotrichea (Ciliophora) from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Sci Rep 11, 19110 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97709-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97709-2

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing