Abstract
Chemosensory receptors play a crucial role in distinguishing the wide range of volatile/soluble molecules by binding them with high accuracy. Chemosensation is the main sensory modality in organisms lacking long-range sensory mechanisms like vision/hearing. Despite its low number of sensory neurons, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans possesses several chemosensory receptors, allowing it to detect about as many odorants as mammals. Here, we show that C. elegans displays attraction towards urine samples of women with breast cancer, avoiding control ones. Behavioral assays on animals lacking AWC sensory neurons demonstrate the relevance of these neurons in sensing cancer odorants: calcium imaging on AWC increases the accuracy of the discrimination (97.22%). Also, chemotaxis assays on animals lacking GPCRs expressed in AWC allow to identify receptors involved in binding cancer metabolites, suggesting that an alteration of a few metabolites is sufficient for the cancer discriminating behavior of C. elegans, which may help identify a fundamental fingerprint of breast cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The discovery of cheap and non-invasive diagnostic strategies for the early detection of cancer is an urgent priority. Cancer is a disease that deeply alters the metabolome of the organism, potentially introducing its own characteristic waste products in biofluids1,2. It has been reported that cancer tissues exude volatile compounds, and taking advantage of the extraordinary sense of smell of dogs and mice, previous studies allowed to demonstrate the existence of yet unknown cancer-specific odorants in biological fluids3,4. Animals perceive as odors a large variety of volatile molecules through olfactory perception. The ability to respond adaptively to any chemical alteration of the surrounding world is of pivotal importance for life and health in most animal species5. Indeed, odors serve animals as environmental trackers to localize food and water sources, for nesting, and to discriminate conspecifics (pheromones6) from individuals of other species (allelochemicals7). Different compounds or different ratios of the same compound result in a specific odor fingerprint that may modulate such behaviors.
Odor sensing is mediated by a large family of proteins, known as G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs)8. These are seven-transmembrane domain proteins that upon binding their ligands, activate G-proteins, which in turn initiate intracellular signaling cascades. GPCRs are mainly expressed in the cilia of the olfactory neurons (ORNs)9. As yet, it is widely accepted, although with some exception10, that each olfactory neuron in mammals expresses uniquely one kind of olfactory receptor11,12,13. The segregation of GPCRs on distinct olfactory cells ensures odor discrimination when the signals from functionally identical neurons are integrated into the olfactory bulb. On the contrary in C. elegans, each olfactory neuron presents multiple types of GPCRs on its membrane. C. elegans is a nematode widely studied as a model organism in different fields thanks to many properties, which include ease of cultivation, invariant cell number, genetic tractability, and optical accessibility of its cells. In the past years, these advantages have been exploited, leading, for example, to the reconstruction of its entire cell lineage14,15, and of its nervous system16,17,18,19, although the latter is still lacking some key information20. Interestingly, despite the large number of genes encoding olfactory receptors (more than 1,000 including gustatory receptors)21,22, this nematode possesses a relatively small number of chemosensory neurons, namely, 32, three of which are specialized to sense volatile molecules. Each olfactory neuron in C. elegans is therefore likely to detect a wider range of odorants if compared to mammalian ones23,24. As a consequence, the combinatorial complexity of the odorant-receptor pair is extremely high in the nematode. Furthermore, the same GPCR can be expressed on distinct cells22 and the same odorant can bind different GPCRs on functionally different neurons and, depending on its concentration, it may elicit opposite behavioral outcomes25. To date, the majority of the behavioral olfactory assays reported in C. elegans are designed for single substances, and responses have been assessed for a large variety of either volatile or soluble molecules including alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, esters, amines, sulfhydryls, organic acids, aromatic and heterocyclic compounds24,26. Many of the substances mediating attraction are natural metabolic products of bacteria27,28, the food source of the nematode. However, the environmental stimuli C. elegans is exposed to are mostly complex mixtures of chemical compounds associated with competitive responses. Different ratios of attractive and repulsive components of a mixture can asymmetrically activate the neuronal architecture involved in the sensation of odors. As a result, C. elegans preference between two odors can be inverted in the presence of a third one29,30. This highlights the importance of the chemical background on the C. elegans olfactory decision-making mechanism31.
Recently, it was demonstrated that C. elegans displays attractive chemotaxis towards cancer urine samples while it is repelled by control samples32 in a highly accurate way. The ablation of olfactory neurons and the study on G protein \(\alpha\) mutants suggest that these responses are elicited by volatile compounds. Urine is notably a complex biofluid containing a large number of volatile compounds that differ in their chemical and physical features (i.e., molecular weight, polarity, hydrophobicity). The urine volatilome33, which includes the signatures of metabolic breakdown of food, contaminants, drugs, endogenous and bacterial by-products, is related to the state of health of the individual. Altered concentrations in the volatilome have been found in spectra of GC/MS on cancer biofluids34,35,36, but, to date, the identification of specific cancer biomarkers through these methods may be problematic given the sensitivity up to the micromolar range and the difficulties in identifying large percentages of the total metabolites which are detected in a biological matrix37. Among this high number of molecules, the high sensitivity and specificity of the C. elegans olfactory system (up to the nanomolar range23) may guide the identification of the essential metabolic signature of cancer.
In this work, we propose a worm-based strategy to discriminate between healthy and breast cancer urine samples by exploiting the high sense of smell of the nematode. We first examine the strong innate attraction of the nematode to urine samples from cancer patients. Specifically, calcium imaging analyses allowed us to measure a 97.22% accuracy of C. elegans ability in discriminating between urine samples collected from healthy subjects and women with breast cancer. We also prove that cancer samples activate specific olfactory neurons (AWCs) reliably, and identify a subset of GPCRs that may be involved in this neuronal response. A deep understanding of the biochemical mechanisms underlying the strong attraction towards cancer samples in C. elegans can generate valuable insights about the identification of essential biomarkers for early cancer detection.
Results
Sample collection and clinical characterization of breast cancer subjects
We collected n=36 urine samples from women with breast cancer and n=36 urine samples from sex- and age-matched healthy donors. Both groups ranged between 25 and about 90 years of age. Cancer features are reported in Table 1: 88.9% of cases are invasive ductal carcinoma, the most common form of breast cancer. To test the ability of C. elegans to detect cancer early, the majority of breast cancer patients (66.7%) were selected in the initial stages of the disease.
Chemotaxis towards women urine samples is affected by the hormone cycle
To confirm that C. elegans displays avoidance towards urine samples from healthy donors32, we initially performed population chemotaxis assays (Fig. 1A) using samples from healthy women. A first set of assays carried out on samples from 10 independently selected women showed contradictory results (Supplementary Fig. S1). Surprisingly, opposite chemotaxis indexes (CI) values were also observed in chemotaxis assays performed on independent samples collected from the same individual at different days along a period of one month (Fig. 1B). These data suggested a major role of the female hormone cycle in modulating the chemotactic response of nematodes. To test this hypothesis, we collected biological samples three times a week from six healthy fertile, pill-free women, three of them being <30 years of age (group 1), the others being >40 years (group 2). Sample collection started two days following the end of the menstrual cycle and finished at the beginning of the next. Data reported in Fig. 1C,D suggest a positive correlation between the chemotactic response of animals and both the follicular and periovulatory phases. While a peak in the estradiol release characterizes the former phase, the levels of the follicular stimulating (FSH) and luteinizing (LH) hormones promptly rise during the latter38. Similarly, a positive CI was measured during the mid-luteal phase, which is characterized by a second wave of estrogen release associated with the progesterone peak. Interestingly, the shape of the pre-ovulation peaks was narrower within group 1 (younger women) compared to group 2 (eldest women), in agreement with the well-established changes in hormonal release with aging38.
These findings demonstrate how the avoidance behavior of C. elegans towards control urine samples is strongly influenced by the menstrual cycle. Such a hormone-dependent behavior has not been previously reported32, making data interpretation quite puzzling. In subsequent analyses, samples of fertile women have been collected during two relatively narrow and specific time-windows, i.e., a few days after the end of the period or between the follicular and luteal phases, in order to avoid false positive results.
C. elegans is attracted to urine samples from women with breast cancer but avoids control samples
Two cohorts were enrolled for this study: a first group included 36 women aged 38–92 years diagnosed with primary breast cancer (bc) as reported in Table 1; a second group was composed of 36 supposedly healthy and age-matched females (hd). Based on the aforementioned considerations, samples from fertile women were collected two days following the end of the menstrual phase (see Methods for details). In line with previous data indicating a dose-dependent effect of cancer-derived biological samples on C. elegans chemotaxis behavior32, we tested several concentrations of urine and found that the maximum attraction to breast cancer samples, as well as the highest avoidance towards controls, peaked at a dilution of 10\(^{-1}\) (Supplementary Fig. S2). Population assays showed that C. elegans displays a significant preference for samples collected from women with breast cancer, whereas control urines behave as chemorepellents promoting avoidance (*P < 0.001; ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey’s HSD) (Fig. 1E and Supplementary Fig. S2). The sensitivity of the test was 75\(\%\), while the specificity was 97.22\(\%\), yielding an accuracy of 86.11\(\%\). In two smokers, the analysis was also carried out after one smoke-free week, with no changes in the overall response, indicating that the result is not affected by cigarette smoking. These data confirm and extend previous findings indicating that C. elegans hermaphrodites can detect breast cancer urines and discriminate them from control samples with relatively high specificity and sensitivity.
A major role of AWCON neuron in sensing cancer urine samples
Chemotaxis is the downstream outcome of the integration of several upstream signals from chemosensory neurons. The result of a chemotaxis assay may be altered by the presence of interfering stimuli of any nature that may originate from temperature, humidity, and/or mechanical solicitations for instance. To effectively determine whether C. elegans perceives cancer metabolites and with what accuracy, calcium imaging proves to be a powerful tool because it allows to directly record the activity of upstream olfactory neurons activated by ligands regardless of the presence of concurrent cues sensed by other neurons. The dissection of the neural olfactory circuit in C. elegans through ablation, behavioral assays23,24, calcium imaging39, and the electron micrographs16 shows the existence of three main pairs of olfactory sensory neurons with winged cilia named AWA, AWB and AWC40,41. AWA and AWC mediate attraction to volatile odorants while AWB mainly responds to repulsive compounds42. The two AWC neurons are structurally similar but functionally different: AWCON neuron expresses a chemoreceptor-encoding gene, str-2, missing in AWCOFF, that instead expresses an alternative chemoreceptor gene, srsx-3. As a consequence, AWCON neuron senses 2-butanone and acetone, while AWCOFF neuron senses 2–3 pentanedione. This genetic and functional asymmetry is fundamental in C. elegans odor discrimination and it could play a pivotal role in cancer sensing43. AWC olfactory neurons are activated by odor removal and inhibited in the persistent presence of attractants. Another neuron pair results to be a good candidate for mediating the avoidance behavior towards urine samples collected from healthy subjects: the ASH polymodal neuron pair, which is reported to be associated with aversive stimuli23. All these neurons are located in the head of the nematode (see the 3D reconstruction in Fig. 2A based on the data from44, available at the open source repository https://github.com/openworm/CElegansNeuroML). The olfactory neurons synapse onto several interneurons which act on motoneurons that initiate movements towards or away from the source of the stimulus (Fig. 2B).
A major role of AWCON and a minor one of AWA in mediating attraction towards diverse biological samples from different types of solid tumors has recently been shown32. To better understand which neurons participate in the chemotaxis behavior towards urine samples, we record the activity of AWA, AWB, AWC, and ASH in response to stimulation with cancer and control samples. To do this, we use transgenic worms expressing a calcium indicator on the neuron of interest, specifically GCaMP3 (circularly permuted green fluorescent protein-calmodulin-M13 peptide version 3). These animals are challenged against a selected panel of well-known attractive odorants to demonstrate functional equivalence with the wild-type N2 strain (data not shown). We then test the response of the aforementioned neurons to chemicals associated with either a strong negative chemotaxis index (for neurons sensing aversive stimuli) or a strong positive chemotaxis index (for neurons sensing attractants). As a reference for strong repulsion while assessing the response of the AWB and ASH neurons, we used a urine sample that tested negative multiple times in chemotaxis assays. As a reference for attraction for the AWC and the AWA neurons, we used three urine samples that tested positive multiple times in the assays. Figure 2C shows typical responses from three of the four candidate neurons. We exclude AWA neurons, being their role secondary, less reliable, and redundant when compared to AWC neurons, as also demonstrated in32. Moreover, the AWA neuron expresses a lower number of chemoreceptors9, if compared to those of AWC neurons with two receptors in common with AWC: this makes it sensitive to a lower array of chemicals22. Responses from the AWB neurons seem to not correlate with either addition or removal of attractant or repellent (although showing calcium-related dynamics during the experiment), while the ASH neuron responses were not reliable enough, showing a high standard deviation. The AWCON neuron instead responds with robust hyperpolarization during the addition of cancer urine and strong depolarization upon its removal in a stereotyped fashion while it is often silent with healthy control samples.
To further demonstrate the role of AWCON in recognizing breast cancer metabolites, we perform chemotaxis assays on the PY7502 strain, in which both the AWC neurons were genetically ablated. Since the chemotactic response is known to be affected by the population density on an assay plate45, odor preference of AWC-ablated animals is tested in both population and single-worm assays, by using three among the most informative cancer urine samples (i.e., those associated with the higher CI). As expected, and in line with previous findings, our data show that AWC-ablated nematodes have a reduced ability to sense cancer metabolites (*P < 0.05, Mann-Withney test), indicating an essential role for the AWC amphid neurons in mediating this behavior (Fig. 2D). Together, these results suggest that the AWCON neuron plays a determinant role in driving attraction towards cancer biofluids. However, because this neuron is associated with attraction, it cannot account for repulsion sensed by the nematodes.
Specific concentration and stimulation time maximize the discriminating power of AWCON
To measure the overall tendency of C. elegans to respond through the activation of the AWCON neuron upon the subtraction of a specific chemical, we define the neuronal activation index (NAI):
where \(N_{act}\) is the number of nematodes responding with the activation of the AWCON neuron upon subtraction of the odorant and \(N_{tot}\) is the number of viable nematodes tested for the same chemical stimulus. This definition forces the index to range from \(-1\) to 1 and allows us a direct comparison with the chemotaxis index (see Methods for details).
To define the optimal range of urine dilution at which the nematode sensitivity is maximized, we test various concentrations from 10−1 to 10−5 (the pure sample is discarded because urine pH may interfere with the nematode preferences) of a subset of samples eliciting either a highly positive or a highly negative index in chemotactic assays. The value that maximizes the activation rate upon positive sample removal is 10−2 (activation rate of 83.33%). At this value, the contrast between the activation rates of positive and control samples is also the best one for the considered range (Fig. 2E). To determine how C. elegans distinguishes cancer urine samples from control ones, we investigate the neuronal activation index of AWC as a function of the length of the stimulus time for a control sample. We record the AWC activation rates and measure the corresponding NAIs for control samples as a function of the length of the stimulus time (Supplementary Fig. S3). The NAI values highlight how the stimulus presented for longer times elicits attractive-like responses in the majority of the tested nematodes, whereas shorter time windows are associated with no response from most of the collected AWC traces. This suggests that metabolites eliciting the activation of AWC neurons are less concentrated in control samples in comparison with samples from cancer patients.
Analysis of the activity of AWC neurons greatly improves the accuracy in cancer screening
For high-throughput experiments in calcium imaging, we simultaneously record neuronal activity from multiple nematodes. Nematodes are loaded onto a custom-designed microfluidic device with an all-liquid environment with a design based on the pulse arena of46 (Fig. 3A,B). We acquire results for 36 women with breast cancer and 36 healthy subjects. Each sample has been tested in at least two different sessions, in which a minimum of 25 worms has been exposed to the odorant. This means that the NAI reported for every subject is obtained considering a minimum of 50 nematodes. In Fig. 3C,D show typical traces obtained for one sample of both groups.
To calculate the NAIs, we define a rule for the systematic identification of significant activation events in the AWCON neuron. To do this, we employ a custom script that extracts the fluorescence traces from the videos and evaluates them. Figure 4 shows the pipeline of the post-processing process for an example image. More details are reported in the relative section of Methods.
Figure 5A shows a bar plot reporting for each sample the resulting NAI (left) and the CI (right). As expected, there is a clear tendency in the NAIs obtained through calcium imaging: cancer samples are associated with a positive NAI, while healthy subjects have a negative NAI, meaning that the first group elicits the activation of the AWCON neuron as opposed to the second one, which does not trigger with the same frequency the chemical response in the neuron. Moreover, the measured NAIs are consistent with the results obtained in the chemotaxis assays, and with the assumption that the AWCON neuron mediates chemical attraction, contributing to a positive CI. PCA analysis (Fig. 5B, bottom graph) considering both indexes (Fig. 5B, top graph) shows a first component explaining the 90.97% of the total variance. The NAI contributes to more than the 97.31% of this component, highlighting its significance as a discriminator. The ROC curves as well, show how the NAI index is a better descriptor to discriminate between the two groups of samples (Fig. 5C) compared to the CI. When looking at the distributions of the CIs, the NAIs, and PC1 (Fig. 5D, from top to bottom respectively), the use of a linear combination of the two indexes (as PC1) contributes to the shifting of a few values close to zero in the NAI distribution. For the healthy donors distribution, this is probably because the NAI lacks a corresponding N- term, accounting for repelled nematodes in the CI. This makes it more sensitive to detect attraction, while it is unable to distinguish between a lacking response and repulsion. Linearly combining the NAI with a quantity that takes into account repulsion as well, increases the distance from zero for some of the low-intensity values appearing in the NAI distribution. The accuracy associated with calcium imaging experiments (97.22%) is significantly higher than the one obtained through chemotaxis (86.11%). The accuracy is defined as the proportion of true positives and true negatives among the total number of cases examined. Additionally, the NAI index is associated with higher accuracy in discriminating urine samples of the cancer group from the healthy one. The fact that the accuracy of the NAI evaluated only on the AWCON neuron is higher than the one associated with the chemotaxis index supports the hypothesis that this neuron plays the main role in mediating attraction towards urine samples. For this to be true, urine samples eliciting attraction must contain chemicals at concentrations allowing them to interact with receptors on AWCs. This means that its receptors are good candidates as binding substrates for cancer-related metabolites, providing chemo-physical constraints on the interacting metabolites and their relative abundances. On the other hand, the high accuracy associated with the AWCON neuron also proves that chemical avoidance is not needed to discriminate between healthy samples and positive ones. However, C. elegans moves away from negative samples instead of just not showing attraction towards them. This suggests that there is a concurrent mechanism (yet not identified) contributing to the measured chemotaxis indexes, acting in a complementary way.
Identification of the C. elegans G protein-coupled receptors involved in the attraction towards cancer samples
It is well established that AWA and AWC neuron pairs mediate positive chemotactic responses to volatile odorants24 and as the predominant response to cancer urine is positive chemotaxis, we assumed that at least one cancer-metabolite receptor is expressed in the AWA and/or the AWC neurons. To test this hypothesis and identify the putative G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) responsible for sensing cancer urine metabolites, a small-scale pilot screen of AWC/AWA-GPCR mutants available from the Caenorhabidtis Genetics Center (CGC), was performed via chemotaxis assays (Table 2). We chose to expose the mutant strains to two cancer urine samples. The ones that showed a significantly reduced CI compared to that of wild-type animals, were to be considered putative cancer-sensing GPCRs. We first focused on the mutant strains harboring a deletion of individual GPCRs expressed in AWC neurons. Five mutant strains were tested. Two of them, sra-13(zh13) and str-2(ok3148) resulted in a significantly lower CI compared to N2, suggesting an involvement of these receptors in responding to breast cancer urine samples (Fig. 6). Str-2, is expressed in AWC neurons exclusively, while sra-13 is expressed in both AWA and AWC neurons (Table 2). Three null mutants, srsx-5(gk960578), str-130(gk948599), and str-199(gk949542), displayed a CI towards breast cancer samples that was not significantly different compared to that observed in wild-type animals, indicating that the encoded receptors are unlikely to play a major role in sensing cancer metabolites (Fig. 6).
A couple of strains, namely srt-26(gk947940) and sri-14(ok2865), could not be tested because, for the former, the deleted region encompasses a pseudogene, as described in WormBase release WS273, and the latter manifested locomotion defects in a thrashing assay (Supplementary Fig. S4) impeding proper completion of the chemotaxis assay, which requires normal motility to be performed. It is worth to notice that this finding may highlight an unpredicted expression of the sri-14 gene in neurons controlling locomotion, although an off-target effect occurred during the original mutagenesis screen cannot be excluded. On a second instance, despite the lower performance of AWA neurons in responding to urine samples, the results observed with sra-13(zh13) mutant are suggestive of a putative contribution of such neurons and additional analysis on AWA-GPCR deletion mutants were therefore included. We examined a couple of strains available from the CGC, namely sra-17 (ve511[LoxP+myo-2::GFP+NeoR+LoxP]) and odr-10(ky225). Interestingly, sra-17 deletion mutant showed a significant diminished CI towards cancer urine compared to N2 (Fig. 6). This result suggests that despite the less robust calcium response of the AWA neurons, receptors on such neurons might have a role in recognizing breast cancer metabolites, confirming the complexity underlying the olfactory system of C. elegans. Major information on the genes encoding the receptors herein analyzed are summarized in Table 2.
Discussion
In this study, we reported the ability of C. elegans to efficiently discriminate between subjects diagnosed with breast cancer and healthy controls by responding to urine, a bio-fluid that harbors an odor signature that is cancer-specific32. The strongest evidence showing that C. elegans detects cancer smells in urine resides in the nematode binary behavior observed in chemotaxis assays and calcium imaging analyses. Indeed, we measured that urine from cancer subjects induced attraction while avoidance was observed towards control samples with high accuracy (>97%). We also showed that the response of the nematode is dependent on the female hormone cycle, a phenomenon that has not been previously reported32. According to these findings, we suggest collecting urine samples from fertile women during two specific time-windows, i.e., a few days after the end of the period or between the follicular and luteal phases, to lower the rate of false positives in the context of a diagnostic setting.
Genetic analyses allowed us to identify the sensory neurons involved in this behavior as well as the individual GPCRs potentially responsible for the recognition of urine cancer metabolites. Chemotaxis assays with mutant strains lacking AWC neurons (AWC-killed strains), implied the involvement of AWC olfactory neurons in attraction towards cancer urine samples. Even though the mutation of ceh-36 affects a second chemosensory neuron, ASE, we could not confirm its contribution in sensing cancer urine as ASE is involved in the tasting response towards water-soluble metabolites. To measure a response towards this type of molecules, a different chemotaxis assay protocol is required24. We performed the experiments over the period of one hour, which is not enough time for water-soluble molecules to diffuse on the plate and be detected by the worms. A one-hour long chemotaxis assay is sufficient for volatile components to diffuse and to be sensed. Under these circumstances, we could not define a role for ASE neurons in sensing cancer urine. Nevertheless, the ceh-36 mutants retained some capacity to discriminate between cancer urine and control samples suggesting that AWC is not the sole neuron detecting cancer smells. A possible contribution may derive from another olfactory neuron, AWA, also implicated in attraction towards volatile molecules23. However, calcium imaging analyses showed a less robust and accurate activity of this neuron if compared to AWC in response to urine samples.
To further dissect the molecular basis of this response, we investigated the role of GPCRs which are responsible for odor sensing. C. elegans sensory neurons express several GPCRs as opposite to mammalian neurons, in which one neuron only expresses one type of receptors. AWC neurons express more than twenty different kinds of GPCRs with unknown functions22. Chemotaxis assays using AWC specific GPCR knock-out mutants showed involvement of two of these GPCRs, namely, str-2 and sra-13, suggesting a role for these receptors in recognizing cancer-related molecules. AWA neuron expresses approximately half the amount of the olfactory receptors expressed in AWC22. Worms harboring a deletion for sra-13 and sra-17, both expressed in AWA, resulted to be defective in attraction towards cancer urine implicating that AWA olfactory neurons are also involved in cancer smells attraction. Of note, the molecular mechanisms underlying chemotaxis towards cancer metabolites are predicted to be more complex due to the possible synergistic effect exerted by multiple molecules. Furthermore, the analysis was restricted to GPCRs for which knock-out mutants were available from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center. To explore the contribution of additional receptors, future studies will be directed to generate novel null mutants of genes encoding GPCRs expressed in AWC and/or AWA sensory neurons via CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Control urine avoidance behavior should also require G protein signaling pathways. However, ASH and AWB neurons, the main neurons mediating repulsion to volatile molecules, do not seem to induce avoidance from control urine. In fact, their neuronal dynamics are not reliable when the animals are exposed to control samples. The avoidance response from control samples could be the result of a complicated neuronal interaction involving several sensory neurons and a sophisticated signal transduction apparatus associated with possible co-expression and heterodimerization of GPCRs49 and could be more context-dependent if compared to the cancer attractive behavior. The biochemical complexity in the chemoreceptors expression may be an evolutionary adaptation mechanism to counterbalance the neuro-anatomical simplicity of C. elegans nervous system and its low plasticity50. As a result, this complexity makes it more difficult to address the role of single olfactory neurons and to fully identify receptor complexes and their mechanisms in the overall functioning of the corresponding neuron51. Nevertheless, the impressive accuracy (97.22%) of AWC neurons suggests that the cancer urine blend comprises several components/metabolites present in distinctive relative abundances that robustly bind the olfactory receptors on these neurons.
In conclusion, our results confirm that C. elegans can sense cancer-related metabolites in urine samples collected from women with breast cancer. This ability is strongly dependent on the hormonal cycle, and we identify the time window of screening validity. We demonstrate that calcium imaging on olfactory neurons yields more reliable results in comparison with chemotaxis assays (86.11%), aside from being less time-consuming. Additionally, AWC responses in calcium imaging do not seem to be correlated with tumor stage, i.e., detection accuracy is high even at early stages (data not shown), whereas chemotaxis assays show a positive trend with respect to cancer stage (Supplementary Fig. S5), although the data distributions cannot be associated to a significant correlation. We verified through calcium imaging that the main contributor to the C. elegans cancer discriminating behavior is the AWCON chemosensory neuron and found a set of relevant GPCR receptors via genetic screens. The involvement of multiple GPCRs in the process suggests that multiple metabolites are sensed by C. elegans through the AWC neuron. However, it has to be highlighted that diverse GPCRs can also bind the same metabolite with different affinities.
Taken together, our results represent a proof of principle study for the exploitation of the incredible accuracy of the C. elegans chemosensory circuit to investigate the metabolic trace of cancer present in urine samples. To date, we do not have enough evidence to claim that a worm-based cancer detection strategy can provide a direct identification of the type of tumor. As for now, such a tool would be able to detect whether a cancerous condition exists but further analysis would be necessary to determine which type of cancer is spreading. We hypothesize that different cancer types potentially produce diverse odors perceivable by the nematode through its olfactory receptors (GPCRs). Our speculation is that different GPCRs would bind to different cancer-specific odors. Additional experiments exposing mutant worms lacking individual GPCRs to samples deriving from different cancer types would help us elucidate whether the worms can specifically discriminate against the cancer types. Moreover, the combined application of GC/MS analysis would provide a compelling “cancer odor profile” for different cancer types. In conclusion, the small nematode C. elegans holds the potential to help design a fast and cost-effective diagnostic screening test for breast cancer, with high reliability, based on the simple collection of biofluids.
Methods
Study design and sample collection
This study was approved by the Santa Lucia Foundation Ethics Board. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Written and informed consent was obtained from all participants before study enrollment. Midstream urine samples were collected from subjects with diagnosed primary breast cancer (n=36) before surgical procedure at the M. G. Vannini hospital in Rome. These women were not hospitalized until the day of surgery, therefore they were not subjected to any specific dietary plan. All cases were correlated with histology findings. Controls (n=36) were healthy, age-matched volunteers with no declared history of pathological conditions. For both groups, pregnant women were excluded from study enrollment, as were women taking the contraceptive pill. Women who consumed alcohol a day before collection and subjects under bacteria, viral, or fungal infection were also excluded. All volunteers were not following a specific pharmaceutical treatment and were not required to follow any particular diet. For fertile women, samples were collected two days after the end of the menstrual cycle. Upon arrival, all urine samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 4 \(^\circ\)C, aliquoted in 0.2 ml tubes as single-use samples and stored at \(-80\,^\circ\)C until measurements and analysis. On the day of the experiments, urine samples were diluted in either S-Basal for calcium imaging or water for chemotaxis assays. A 1:100 dilution was used for calcium imaging measurements while 1:10 dilutions were utilized for odor screening chemotaxis assays. All dilutions were filtered before presenting them to the animals.
Worm culture and strains
Caenorhabditis elegans strains were cultured at 20 \(^\circ\)C on nematode growth medium (NGM) plates seeded with Escherichia coli OP50 as food source (Brenner, 1974). Wild-type animals used for this study were the Bristol N2 strain, obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, along with a number of deletion mutant strains, including VC2123: sri-14(ok2865) I, CX3410: odr-10(ky225) X, AH159: sra-13 (zh13) II, RG3011: sra-17(ve511[LoxP+myo-2::GFP+NeoR+LoxP]) II, VC20435: srt-26(gk947940), VC30151: srsx-5(gk960578), VC10129: str-199(gk949542), VC40389: str-130(gk948599), RB2316: str-2(ok3148) V. The strain harboring GCaMP in AWCON neuron was the PS6374: AWCON-GCaMP syEx1240 [str-2::GCaMP3+pha-1]; pha-1(e2123ts); him-5 (e1490); in ASH neuron was the PS6386: ASH-GCaMP syEx1246 [sra-6::GCaMP3+pha-1]; pha-1(e2123ts); in AWB neuron was the PS6384: AWB-GCaMP syEx1245 [str-1::GCaMP3+pha-1]; pha-1(e2123ts). The three of them were a kind gift from Dr. Alon Zaslaver, (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel). The AWC-killed strain: PY7502, oyIs85 [ceh-36p::TU813 + ceh-36p::TU814 + srtx-1p::GFP + unc-122p::DsRed] was a kind gift from Dr. Arantza Barrios (The University College London, London).
Behavioral assays
For the chemotaxis assays, ten adult hermaphrodites were picked onto fresh NGM plates seeded with OP50 E. coli bacteria. The worms were left to lay eggs for five hours and then removed from the plates. Eggs were incubated at 20 \(^\circ\)C and after four days adults were used for the test52. Chemotaxis assays were performed as previously described (Bargmann et al., 1993) with minor modifications. Briefly, assay plates were prepared using 10 cm Petri dishes containing 11 ml of modified NGM (2\(\%\) agar, 5mM KPO4 [pH6], 1mM CaCl2, 1mM MgSO4). Adult worms were washed twice in S-basal, once in distilled water and approximately 50-100 worms were placed in the center of the plate right before starting the assay. The plates were divided into four quadrants referred to as the control and the odorant areas (Fig. 1A). The control areas contained 1 \(\mu\)l of neutral buffer, whereas the odorant area contained 1 \(\mu\)l of either control or cancer urine sample, diluted in Milli-Q water at 1:10. One microliter of 1 M \(\hbox {NaN}_3\) was applied on each spot in order to immobilize the worms once they reached the area. After 60 minutes, animals were counted and a chemotaxis index (CI) was calculated as follows: (number of animals in the odorant area) – (number of animals in the control area) / total number of animals tested. Chemotaxis assays were performed in triplicate on separate chemotaxis plates, to ensure assay reproducibility53.
Single worm chemotaxis assay
Single-animal chemotaxis assays were performed as previously described54 with some modifications. Assay plates were prepared using 5 cm Petri dishes containing 4 ml of modified NGM (2% agar, 5mM KPO4 [pH6], 1mM CaCl2, 1mM MgSO4). To visualize the trace of worms, the agar surface was dried for two hours just before placing the animals by opening the plate lid in the fume hood. Animals were placed on NGM plates without bacteria for one hour before the assay, then placed in the center of the assay plate, 2 cm away from the source of urine samples. One agar plug was placed onto the lid of the plates and 1 \(\upmu\)l of diluted sample was added to the plug immediately following the worm. After 20 min, the tracks left by the worms were visualized and the chemotaxis score was calculated as the sum of scores of the sectors through which the animal had traveled54.
Thrashing assay
The locomotion behavior was assessed through thrashing assays performed on wild type worms (N2, Bristol) and sri-14 (ok2865) mutant animals. Assays were carried out at 20 \(^\circ\)C on 35 mm OP50-free plates filled with 1 ml of M9 buffer (6 g/l Na 2 HPO 4 , 3 g/l KH 2 PO 4 , 5 g/l NaCl, 0.12 g/l MgSO 4). From plates containing synchronized young-adults, one animal at a time was transferred to a food-free NGM agar plate for 2 minutes to remove the bacteria and then assayed after 1 minute of acclimatization. Thrashes were counted for 20 seconds and multiplied by 3 to obtain an estimate per minute. A single thrash was defined as a complete change in direction of bending at mid-body. At least 10 animals per genotype were assayed.
Microfluidic device design for neuronal imaging
For calcium imaging experiments, odor pulses were delivered through microfluidic devices whose geometry is based on the pulse arena of55, with some variations introduced in the design: smoothing of the loading channel to facilitate nematode loading, removal of the free space between the layer of pillars and the inflow/outflow channels to avoid nematode piling up in the outflow side of the chip even under very slow flows, miniaturization of the overall dimension of the arena from 2 \(\times\) 2 \(\hbox {cm}^2\) to 3.25 \(\times\) 3.25 \(\hbox {mm}^2\) to record signals from approximately 20 animals at once within a field of view of 3.25 \(\times\) 3.25 \(\hbox {mm}^2\) at 4\(\times\) magnification of the CMOS camera. The chip, placed on an XY-microscope stage, is linked to two pressurized bottles through Tygon tubes that drive the liquid directly in the inlet of the chip. The bottles are supplied by a gas line controlled with a gas adjustable regulator fixed at 100 mbar of pressure. The pressure value is validated to ensure a correct compromise between a fast odor switching in the arena (less than two seconds) and the avoidance of undesirable strong mechanical perturbations on the nematodes. Flow switch between odor and buffer is actuated slowly (about 2 seconds) by motorized valves directly controlled through software to prevent the inception of dangerous shock waves propagating in the tubes typically generated by a fast clogging of conventional solenoid valves. The electric command sent to the motorized valve is a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal that allows to close them slowly without excessive stresses on the tube.
Microfluidic device fabrication
The microfluidic device is prepared by using the soft lithography process56. The SU-8 (MicroChem 3000 series) structure is fabricated on a glass substrate by conventional photolithography to obtain a 50 microns thick monolayer microfluidic network. The high-resolution photomask has been directly printed on the microfluidic network with a laser writer to ensure a resolution of 3 microns at the minimum feature size. Then, the 1:10 PDMS (Polydimethylsiloxane Silgard 184) mold replica is cured after the casting process and the holes for inlet/outlet are made with a 0.6 mm puncher to subsequently connect with external Tygon tubes. The PDMS layer is bonded on a microscope glass slide by using an air-plasma treatment (HARRIK PLASMA) and thermal recovery with a hot plate. We first design the microfluidic network with CAD software and then produce the laser drawing of a high-resolution glass photomask.
Experimental setup for calcium imaging
Calcium imaging recordings were made using a custom-designed inverted microscope. A low magnification objective with a high-NA (4\(\times\)/0.28 N.A.) and a sensitive low-noise CMOS camera with a large sensor area (13 \(\times\) 13 \(\hbox {mm}^2\)) allow to collect fluorescence signals from approximately 15–20 nematodes at once in a field of view of approximately 3.25 \(\times\) 3.25 \(\hbox {mm}^2\). Excitation light was reflected on the sample from a high power LED (470 nm - M470L2, Thorlabs, Newton, New Jersey) with a FITC excitation filter (MF475-35, CWL = 475 nm, BW = 35 nm, Thorlabs) and a condenser (ACL2520U-A, Thorlabs), using a dichroic mirror (MD498, Thorlabs). The signal was collected by a digital CMOS camera (ORCA-Flash4.0 C11440, Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan) through the dichroic mirror with a pass-band FITC/TRIC filter (59004x, Chroma, Bellows Falls, Vermont) using a 20X objective with a numerical aperture of 0.28 (XLFLUOR4X/340, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Before starting the recordings, a transmission channel (illumination at 660 nm through a high power LED, M660L4, Thorlabs) allowed to select the visualized area of the arena through a motorized stage (MLS203-1, Thorlabs). To reduce phototoxicity and prevent photo-bleaching, the excitation LED and the camera shutter were synchronized so that the arena was illuminated only during the exposure time (100 ms). During the acquisition, buffer flows for the first 10 and last 30 seconds, while urine sample flows between these time windows for 20 seconds. The LEDs, the electrovalves, and the camera were connected to a PC (Windows 10, 64-bit, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington) through a National Instruments controller (PCI-6221, National Instruments, Austin, Texas). A custom-made software in MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, Massachusetts) was used for synchronized illumination, image acquisition, fluid delivery control, and data recording.
Ca2+ imaging data analysis
All steps of calcium imaging data analysis are made through custom MATLAB scripts. Acquired images are pretreated by subtracting a mean background averaged over 20 background frames evenly recorded before and after the acquisition, and by applying an averaging filter for noise reduction. A custom made GUI allows the user to select ROIs containing viable nematode heads in the frame acquired 2 seconds after removal of chemical stimulus, in which the probability of having visibly active neurons is higher. Nematodes that appear to have restrained access to the surrounding chemicals are discarded. In each ROI, the user is required to select the position of the AWC neuron. On the basis of this information, the script tracks neuronal positions throughout the video in both temporal directions by looking for the maximum intensity averaged over a \(5\times 5\) pixels area that may not be more than 30 pixels away from the neuronal position assigned in the previously processed frame. The resulting signal intensity at frame i, \(I_i\), is calculated as \(I_i=\frac{\Delta F_i}{F_0}\), where \(\Delta F_i=F_i-F_0\). \(F_i\) is the mean intensity of the segmented object representing the neuron. \(F_0\) is the baseline value of fluorescence evaluated as the average of \(F_i\) for \(i=1,2,..10\), a stimulus free time window, in which the neuron is quiescent. In case a neuron changes position in the ROI from a frame i to its next one (\(i+1\)), the element-wise sum of the intensity difference, \(ID_{i,i+1}\), between the ROIs in the two frames will vary much more if compared to a still video. Therefore, viable traces are identified as those ones in which the aforementioned difference satisfies the following condition: \(ID_{i,i+1}<\overline{ID_i}+\sigma _{ID_i}\), where \(\overline{ID_i}\) and \(\sigma _{ID_i}\) are the mean value and the standard deviation respectively, calculated over all the IDs of the frames available in the range going from \(i-20\) to \(i+20\). This allows to exclude signals of moving neurons, whose evaluation may be affected by artifacts. All viable signals detected are visually validated by the user.
Ca2+ data quantification
To quantify the activation rate of the AWCON neurons upon removal of chemical stimulus from calcium imaging traces, we defined the neuronal activation index (NAI) as, \(NAI=2 (\frac{N_{act}}{N_{tot}}-0.5)\), where \(N_{act}\) is the number of nematodes responding with the activation of the AWCON neuron upon subtraction of the odorant and \(N_{tot}\) is the number of viable nematodes tested for the same chemical stimulus. The subtraction of 1/2 forces symmetry around zero, while the prefactor 2 grants that \(\left| {NAI}\right| \le 1\), projecting the quantity into the range \(\left[ -1, 1\right]\). From its definition, it follows that when \(NAI>0\), the majority of the tested nematodes experienced AWCON activation, while a negative value is associated with the activation in a minority of them. For the systematic identification of significant activation events in the AWCON neuron, a custom MATLAB script evaluates the calcium imaging signal intensity, I, for each neuron. If the difference between the mean signal intensity in a 10 second-long post-stimulus time-window, \(I_{off}\), and the mean signal intensity in a 10 second-long time-window while on stimulus, \(I_{on}\), is three times higher than the standard deviation of the signal in the time-window while on stimulus, \(\sigma _{on}\), the response is associated with activation. It is associated with a lack of response otherwise. All associations are then visually validated.
Change history
31 October 2021
The original online version of this Article was revised: In the original version of this Article the author name Martina Di Rocco was incorrectly indexed. The original Article has been corrected.
References
Vander Heiden, M. G., Cantley, L. C. & Thompson, C. B. Understanding the warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324, 1029–1033 (2009).
Wishart, D. S. Is cancer a genetic disease or a metabolic disease?. EBioMedicine 2, 478–479 (2015).
Willis, C. M. et al. Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: Proof of principle study. BMJ 329, 712 (2004).
Matsumura, K. et al. Urinary volatile compounds as biomarkers for lung cancer: a proof of principle study using odor signatures in mouse models of lung cancer. PLoS One 5, e8819 (2010).
Reed, R. R. How does the nose know?. Cell 60, 1–2 (1990).
Shorey, H. H. Animal Communication by Pheromones (Academic Press, New York, 2013).
Whittaker, R. H. & Feeny, P. P. Allelochemics: Chemical interactions between species. Science 171, 757–770 (1971).
Buck, L. & Axel, R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65, 175–187 (1991).
Zhang, C. et al. The signaling pathway of Caenorhabditis elegans mediates chemotaxis response to the attractant 2-heptanone in a trojan horse-like pathogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 23618–23627 (2016).
Mombaerts, P. Odorant receptor gene choice in olfactory sensory neurons: The one receptor-one neuron hypothesis revisited. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 31–36 (2004).
Chess, A., Simon, I., Cedar, H. & Axel, R. Allelic inactivation regulates olfactory receptor gene expression. Cell 78, 823–834 (1994).
Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T. & Buck, L. B. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell 96, 713–723 (1999).
Serizawa, S. et al. Mutually exclusive expression of odorant receptor transgenes. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 687 (2000).
Sulston, J. E., Schierenberg, E., White, J. G. & Thomson, J. N. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 100, 64–119 (1983).
Herman, M. A. Hermaphrodite cell-fate specification. WormBook: The Online Rev. C. elegans Biol. [Internet] (2006).
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N. & Brenner, S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 314, 1–340 (1986).
Achacoso, T. B. & Yamamoto, W. S. AY’s Neuroanatomy of C. elegans for Computation (CRC Press, New York, 1991).
Durbin, R. M. Studies on the Development and Organisation of the Nervous System of Caenorhabditis elegans (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 1987).
Varshney, L. R., Chen, B. L., Paniagua, E., Hall, D. H. & Chklovskii, D. B. Structural properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network. PLoS Comput. Biol 7, e1001066 (2011).
Lanza, E., Di Angelantonio, S., Gosti, G., Ruocco, G. & Folli, V. A recurrent neural network model of C. elegans responses to aversive stimuli. Neurocomputing 430, 1–13 (2021).
Robertson, H. M. & Thomas, J. H. The putative chemoreceptor families of C. elegans. WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology [Internet] (WormBook (2006).
Vidal, B. et al. An atlas of Caenorhabditis elegans chemoreceptor expression. PLoS Biol. 16, e2004218 (2018).
Bargmann, C. I. Chemosensation in C. elegans. WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology [Internet] (WormBook (2006).
Bargmann, C. I., Hartwieg, E. & Horvitz, H. R. Odorant-selective genes and neurons mediate olfaction in C. elegans. Cell 74, 515–527 (1993).
Taniguchi, G., Uozumi, T., Kiriyama, K., Kamizaki, T. & Hirotsu, T. Screening of odor-receptor pairs in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals different receptors for high and low odor concentrations. Sci. Signal. 7, ra39–ra39 (2014).
Troemel, E. R., Kimmel, B. E. & Bargmann, C. I. Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: Sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91, 161–169 (1997).
Worthy, S. E. et al. Identification of attractive odorants released by preferred bacterial food found in the natural habitats of C. elegans. PloS One 13, e0201158 (2018).
Beale, E., Li, G., Tan, M.-W. & Rumbaugh, K. P. Caenorhabditis elegans senses bacterial autoinducers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5135–5137 (2006).
Iwanir, S. et al. Irrational behavior in C. elegans arises from asymmetric modulatory effects within single sensory neurons. Nat. Commun. 10, 3202 (2019).
Cohen, D. et al. Bounded rationality in C. elegans is explained by circuit-specific normalization in chemosensory pathways. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–12 (2019).
Luce, R. D. Individual choice behavior. A theoretical analysis (Courier Corporation (2012).
Hirotsu, T. et al. A highly accurate inclusive cancer screening test using Caenorhabditis elegans scent detection. PLoS One 10, e0118699 (2015).
Amann, A. et al. The human volatilome: Volatile organic compounds (vocs) in exhaled breath, skin emanations, urine, feces and saliva. J. Breath Res. 8, 034001 (2014).
Phillips, M. et al. Volatile markers of breast cancer in the breath. Breast J. 9, 184–191 (2003).
Phillips, M. et al. Prediction of breast cancer using volatile biomarkers in the breath. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 99, 19–21 (2006).
Silva, C., Passos, M. & Camara, J. Investigation of urinary volatile organic metabolites as potential cancer biomarkers by solid-phase microextraction in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Br. J. Cancer 105, 1894 (2011).
Lu, H., Liang, Y., Dunn, W. B., Shen, H. & Kell, D. B. Comparative evaluation of software for deconvolution of metabolomics data based on gc-tof-ms. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 27, 215–227 (2008).
Draper, C. et al. Menstrual cycle rhythmicity: Metabolic patterns in healthy women. Sci. Rep. 8, 14568 (2018).
Chalasani, S. H. et al. Dissecting a circuit for olfactory behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 450, 63 (2007).
Ward, S., Thomson, N., White, J. G. & Brenner, S. Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Comp. Neurol. 160, 313–337 (1975).
Ware, R. W., Clark, D., Crossland, K. & Russell, R. L. The nerve ring of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Sensory input and motor output. J. Comp. Neurol. 162, 71–110 (1975).
Yoshida, K. et al. Odour concentration-dependent olfactory preference change in C. elegans. Nat. Commun. 3, 739 (2012).
Wes, P. D. & Bargmann, C. I. C. C. elegans odour discrimination requires asymmetric diversity in olfactory neurons. Nature 410, 698 (2001).
Szigeti, B. et al. Openworm: An open-science approach to modeling Caenorhabditis elegans. Front. Comput. 8, 137 (2014).
Matsuura, T., Sato, T. & Shingai, R. Interactions between Caenorhabditis elegans individuals during chemotactic response. Zool. Sci. 22, 1095–1104 (2005).
Albrecht, D. R. & Bargmann, C. I. High-content behavioral analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans in precise spatiotemporal chemical environments. Nat. Methods 8, 599 (2011).
Battu, G., Hoier, E. F. & Hajnal, A. The C. elegans g-protein-coupled receptor sra-13 inhibits ras/mapk signalling during olfaction and vulval development. Development 130, 2567–2577 (2003).
Zhang, Y., Chou, J. H., Bradley, J., Bargmann, C. I. & Zinn, K. The Caenorhabditis elegans seven-transmembrane protein odr-10 functions as an odorant receptor in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94, 12162–12167 (1997).
Park, D. et al. Interaction of structure-specific and promiscuous g-protein-coupled receptors mediates small-molecule signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 9917–9922 (2012).
Hodgkin, J. What does a worm want with 20,000 genes?. Genome Biol. 2, comment2008-1 (2001).
Reilly, D. K. & Srinivasan, J. Caenorhabditis elegans olfaction. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (2017).
Stiernagle, T. Maintenance of C. elegans. C. elegans2, 51–67 (1999).
Neto, M. F., Nguyen, Q. H., Marsili, J., McFall, S. M. & Voisine, C. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans displays a chemotaxis behavior to tuberculosis-specific odorants. J. Clin. Tuberc. Other Mycobact. Dis. 4, 44–49 (2016).
Sammut, M. et al. Glia-derived neurons are required for sex-specific learning in C. elegans. Nature 526, 385 (2015).
Larsch, J., Ventimiglia, D., Bargmann, C. I. & Albrecht, D. R. High-throughput imaging of neuronal activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, E4266–E4273 (2013).
Xia, Y. & Whitesides, G. M. Soft lithography. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 153–184 (1998).
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by CrestOptics S.p.A (Rome, Italy). C. elegans strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). We also thank Dr. Alon Zaslaver for providing the AWCON-GCaMP PS6374 strain, Eliana Rondanini for preparing and sending the microfluidic device masks, Prof Silvia Di Angelantonio and Prof. Alberto Boffi for the precious suggestions and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.F. and S.M. conceived the experiments, V.F., E.L., M.D.R., S.S., D.C., E.M., G.F. conducted the experiments and wrote the manuscript, M.T.L provided the biological samples and E.L., M.D.R., S.S., D.C., E.M., G.F., S.M., and V.F. analyzed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
A patent application submitted by CrestOptics S.p.A. and Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT) on the described method for cancer detection and its application is pending. E. Lanza and V. Folli are listed among the inventors of the patent. E. Lanza, S. Schwartz, and D. Caprini are funded by CrestOptics S.p.A.. M. Di Rocco, E. Milanetti, G. Ferrarese, M. T. Lonardo, L. Pannone, G. Ruocco, and S. Martinelli declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lanza, E., Di Rocco, M., Schwartz, S. et al. C. elegans-based chemosensation strategy for the early detection of cancer metabolites in urine samples. Sci Rep 11, 17133 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96613-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96613-z
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.