Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Safety and humoral responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination of SARS-CoV-2 previously infected and naive populations


Since COVID-19 risk of reinfection is of great concern, the safety and efficacy of the mRNA-based vaccines in previously infected populations should be assessed. We studied 78 individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-19, who received a single dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, and 1:2 ratio matched infection-naïve cohort who received two injections. The evaluation procedure included symptom monitoring, and serological tests. Among the post-infected population, the median IgG-S response after the first vaccine dose was 3.35 AU, compared to 2.38 AU after the second vaccine injection in the infection naive group. A strong correlation was demonstrated between IgG-S level before vaccination, and the corresponding responses after a single vaccine dose (r = 0.8, p < 0.001) in the post infected population. Short-term severe symptoms that required medical attention were found in 6.8% among the post-infected individuals, while none were found in the infection naïve population. Our data suggest that a single vaccine dose is sufficient to induce an intense immune response in post-infected population regardless of seropositivity. Although some short-term safety issues were observed compared to the infection naïve population, a single dose regimen can be considered safe in post-infected populations.


Vaccines to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are considered the most promising approach for curbing the pandemic. There are several types of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and mRNA-based vaccines were the first to be approved by the FDA with an efficacy of 94–95% for preventing a symptomatic disease1,2,3. The safety and efficacy of the mRNA-based vaccines were evaluated in prospective clinical trials on SARS-CoV-2 naïve population and the data on the vaccine usability in a previously infected population is gathered from real life case series data4,5,6,7.

Following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, most patients develop detectable serum antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the viral spike protein along with associated neutralizing activities8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. It was previously reported that some cases of asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients failed to mount neutralizing antibodies8,9,10,11,16,17. However, other studies indicate that the vast majority do develop detectable levels of IgM, IgG-S and IgG-N that can persist for more than six months after the acute infection12,14,18,19. The minimal level of antibodies required for infection immunity has yet to be determined. It is also known that in addition to protective antibodies, immunity for recurrent infections includes SARS-CoV-2-specific memory lymphocytes, including the S-antigen presenter by mRNA-based vaccine, that upon antigen reencounter are activated to generate antibodies and secrete a variety of cytokines15,20. It is still not clear if seronegative previously infected individuals are also at an advantage upon recurrent infection.

In addition to vaccine availability, the issue of whether to immunize previously infected SARS-CoV-2 patients is still debated since most of the vaccine related side effects have been attributed to over-activation of the immune system3.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single injection protocol of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccine (BNT162b2) in a previously COVID-19 infected population and compare it to the standard two injection protocol given to the infection-naïve population.


Cohort characteristics

A total of 78 confirmed post-COVID-19 infection patients, who performed a serological test after the first vaccine dose, were identified in Shamir Medical Center’s database. Of them, 45 (57.7%) had a pre-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 serology test as well. Within this subgroup, 9/45 (20%) were seronegative before vaccination.

The infection naive population consisted of 177 cases. Among this cohort, 71 (40.1%) participants had pre-vaccination serology test results, and 24 (33.8%) of them preformed a serology test after the first dose as well. Cohort baseline characteristics, demographics, and high-risk comorbidities data are provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics.

Safety and side effects

We assessed the frequency of local and systemic side effects after vaccination in the post-infected and in the infection-naive cohorts. Local and systemic symptom severity was determined based on3. Briefly, Mild, does not interferes with daily activity; Moderate, some interference with activity, or temperature > 38.5 °C; Severe, prevents daily activity, temperature > 39 °C, or emergency department visit or hospitalization. Figure 1A shows that similar percentages of participants reported having side effects, by severity, in both cohorts. A total of 55/78 (70.5%) reported having a side effect in the post-infected cohort. Similarly 117/177 (66.1%), and 127/177 (71.8%) reported having any type of side effect in the infection-naive cohort after the first and the second injection respectively (Fig. 1A). Most common side effects were local injection-site symptoms (mild pain, redness and swelling), which occurred a few hours after the injection (Fig. 1B, Table 2). Short term allergic reactions were more pronounced in the post-infected population 4.1% compared to 1.1% in the infection-naïve cohort, as well as the overall severe symptoms that required medical attention (emergency department visit or hospitalization), 6.8% in the post-infected population, and 0.6% after the first vaccine dose, and none after the second in the infection naïve population.

Figure 1

Local and systemic side effects reported after the first vaccine dose in the post-infected population (n = 78), and after the second vaccine dose in the naïve population (n = 177). (A) Overall side effects and symptoms in both populations (p = 0.88). (B) Relative frequency of each reported local and systemic side effects (a participant possibly having more than one symptom). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Mild, does not interferes with daily activity; moderate, some interference with activity, or temperature > 38.5 °C; severe, prevents daily activity, temperature > 39 °C, or emergency department visit or hospitalization3.

Table 2 Vaccine-associated side effects.

SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses

We compared antibody titers of the post-infected individuals after a median of 15 days [IQR 12–18] from the first vaccine dose, with comparable 177 naive population results taken after a median of 14 days [IQR 11–17] from the second vaccine dose (p = 0.68). Among the post-infected population, the median IgG-S response after the first vaccine dose was 3.35 AU [IQR 3.17–3.52], while in the infection-naive group, the median level was 1.65 AU [IQR 1.41–1.98] (n = 24), and 2.38 AU [IQR 2.27–2.48] (n = 177) after the first and second vaccine injections respectively (Fig. 2). The time from infection to vaccination was 116.5 days [IQR 96–155]. There was no correlation between the time from infection to vaccination and antibody response levels (Fig. 3).

Figure 2

Serological response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in post-infected individuals and naive population. The boxplot’s central mark indicates the median, and the bottom and top edges of the box indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. p = 0.307 between the post-infected pre-vaccination group and the naïve population after the first dose, otherwise p < 0.0001.

Figure 3

Scatterplot of the time from infection to first vaccination in days, and IgG-S responses in the post-infected cohort. r is Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Repeated sampling analysis was performed in a subgroup of 45 post-infected participants who had also pre-vaccination antibody measurements. Among this group, the median pre-vaccination IgG-S response was 1.58 AU [IQR 1.28–1.81], and 3.25 AU [IQR 3.14–3.48] after the first dose. A strong correlation was demonstrated between IgG-S levels before vaccination, and the corresponding responses after a single vaccination dose (r = 0.8, p < 0.001) as shown in Fig. 4. Notably, the post-infected participants who were found seronegative prior to their vaccination had significantly higher titer levels after a single vaccine dose 3.15 AU [IQR 3.00–3.21] (n = 9, highlighted in Fig. 4), compared to the infection-naive group after two vaccination dosages 2.38 AU [IQR 2.27–2.48] (n = 177).

Figure 4

Scatterplot of the IgG-S responses before vaccination, and the corresponding responses after the first dose in the post-infected cohort (blue), and before vaccination and after the second does in the naive cohort (green). r is Pearson's correlation coefficient. The 95% prediction interval is presented in the gray area. Post-infected participants who were found seronegative prior to their vaccination are highlighted in red.


This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a single mRNA-based vaccine dose in post-SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals. We demonstrate that a single dose induces a strong humoral response regardless of seropositivity in previously infected subjects. Although they had higher rates of adverse events compared to the infection-naïve population, a single vaccine dose was generally safe, and this regimen can be considered for the post-infected population.

The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, administered in a two-dose regimen, provides 95% protection against COVID-19 at least seven days after the second dose1,2,3. The reported efficacy after the first dose is 52%3. Similar to previous case series that evaluated antibody levels after a single mRNA-based vaccine dose in post-infected individuals5,6,7, our post-infected population developed, approximately tenfold higher antibody titer levels compared to the antibody levels after a second dose in the infection-naïve cohort, 2 weeks after vaccination. A linear correlation was found between the pre and post-first vaccine dose antibody titers in the post-infected population. Importantly, even among all seronegative participants who had evidence of a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, a single vaccine dose induced higher titer levels compared to the infection naïve cohort, suggesting immune memory persistence. Specifically, due to the decay of immune memory over time, a single vaccine dose serves as a very potent booster dose for seronegative individuals who were previously infected. With the risk of reinfection increasing with time, several COVID-19 reinfection cases have already been documented21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28. The fact that most reinfected patients are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, raises the possibility that immunity is maintained and reduces the disease symptom severity even in cases of undetectable antibody levels at the time of reinfection. Here, we studied post-infected individuals vaccinated 3–6 months after the infection. Although there was no correlation between the time from the infection and antibody titer levels, a single vaccine dose induced a strong humoral response even in seronegative individuals.

The higher antibody response after a single vaccination in post infected patients is related to the acquired immune system, developed after the viral exposure. Upon the first infection, B-cells can differentiate into the plasma cells, and produce a first wave of virus neutralizing antibodies, that diminish gradually once the virus was eliminated, or develop into memory B-cells and long-live plasma cells. Memory B-cells preserve specific B-cell receptors (BCRs) of the pathogen that allows them to recognize antigen and mount a specific antibody response. When memory B-cells reencounter their specific antigen, they can proliferate and differentiate into plasma cells faster and of greater magnitude compared with the primary antibody response, and produce a more efficient secondary immune response29. Taken together, in post-infected populations, a single dose vaccine along with a serological test may provide an effective alternative regimen.

Local and systemic side effects were reported among BNT162b2 vaccine recipients. Reactogenicity after the first dose was characterized mostly with mild or moderate local reactions, while after the second dose, also systemic side effects were more common and severe. The frequency of severe systemic events was less than 0.9% and 2% after the first and the second vaccine injections respectively1,2,3. In this study, the reported frequency of local and moderate systemic side effect was in agreement with previous studies. However, 6.8% of the post-infection cases required emergency department visits or hospitalization due to over activation of the immune system or allergic reactions that needed medical supervision and care, while none of the infection naïve participants needed medical care. Severe vaccine related side effects were also reported in other studies of post-infected population4,5. This finding should be taken into consideration when vaccinating this population.

Although this study provides clear evidence regarding immune memory persistence in post infected individuals, the study has several limitations. The relatively small sample size of the post-infected population affected the infection-naïve cohort selection, due to the matching procedure, that may not represent the overall population. In addition, we studied COVID-19 post-infected individuals who were mildly symptomatic, with relatively low pre-vaccination titer levels. Finally, our study does not include information on cell mediated immunity (CMI) responses, which would provide further insight regarding the immune response, especially in post-infected seronegative individuals. Whether our safety conclusions could be generalized to previously moderate and severe COVID-19 infected patients30, has yet to be determined.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that in previously SARS-CoV-2 infected populations, a single dose of an mRNA-based vaccine is sufficient to induce an intense immune response regardless of seropositivity. This vaccine-induced response correlates with the pre-vaccination IgG-S antibody concentration. The overall safety profile of the post-infected cohort is similar to the infection naive population, supporting the notion that a single dose vaccination approach can be considered in this population.


Study population

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of individuals, 18 years or older, who received BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine (Pfizer, New York, US, and BioNTech, Mainz, Germany), and preformed serological tests, within 7–21 days after vaccination, at the Shamir Medical Center, between December 2020, and February 2021. Two population groups were identified: individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-19, and 1:2 ratio matched infection naive population, who received two vaccination injections. Epidemiologic, demographic, pre-existing conditions data, and symptom information after each vaccine dose were collected by telephone interview. The study was approved by Shamir Medical Center institutional review board (IRB) (No. 029-21-ASF), with a waiver for informed consent. Because of the retrospective nature of the study, questionnaire completion was implied as informed consent. All research was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

SARS-CoV-2 serology evaluation

COVID-19 serological tests were performed using the Liaison SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (311450, DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy): A chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for quantitative determination of anti-S1 and anti-S2 specific IgG antibodies using magnetic beads coated with S1 and S2 antigens. The analyzer automatically calculates SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG antibody concentrations expressed as arbitrary units (AU/ml), with a positive minimal cutoff level of 15.0 AU/ml.

Statistical methods

We compared antibody levels and symptom responses between the two study populations of vaccine recipients. Continuous data are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). Independent t-tests with two-tail distribution were performed to compare variables between groups, when a normality assumption holds according to Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. Categorical data were expressed in numbers and percentages and compared by chi-square tests. Univariate analyses were performed using Fisher’s exact test to identify significant variables. Local and systemic side effects are presented as numbers, percentages, and associated Clopper–Pearson 95% confidence intervals. Continuous parameters correlations were performed using the Pearson correlation analysis. Boxplot analysis was used to present data distribution, and to detect outliers. Matching criteria included age (in bins of 5 years), gender, and comorbidities (in count of pre-existing conditions as listed in Table 1). Hamming distance was used to compute the similarity metric. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Data were statistically analyzed using the Matlab Statistics Toolbox, R2020b (Mathworks, Natick, MA).


  1. 1.

    Baden, L. R. et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 384(5), 403–416 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dagan, N. et al. BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1412–1423 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Polack, F. P. et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 383(27), 2603–2615 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ebinger, J. E. et al. Prior COVID-19 infection and antibody response to single versus double dose mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. medRxiv 384, 203 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Krammer, F. et al. Antibody responses in seropositive persons after a single dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1372–1374 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Prendecki, M. et al. Effect of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection on humoral and T-cell responses to single-dose BNT162b2 vaccine. Lancet 397, 1178–1181 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Manisty, C. et al. Antibody response to first BNT162b2 dose in previously SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. Lancet 397, 1057–1058 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Seow, J. et al. Longitudinal evaluation and decline of antibody responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection. medRxiv 5, 1598 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Escribano, P. et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is insufficient for the diagnosis of active or cured COVID-19. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 19893 (2020).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chen, X. et al. Disease severity dictates SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibody responses in COVID-19. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 5(1), 180 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Long, Q. X. et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat. Med. 26(8), 1200–1204 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gudbjartsson, D. F. et al. Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N. Engl. J. Med. 383(18), 1724–1734 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wajnberg, A. et al. Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months. Science 370(6521), 1227–1230 (2020).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dan, J. M. et al. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection. Science 371, eabf4063 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rodda, L. B. et al. Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19. Cell 184(1), 169–183 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rijkers, G. et al. Differences in antibody kinetics and functionality between severe and mild severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections. J. Infect. Dis. 222(8), 1265–1269 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Robbiani, D. F. et al. Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals. Nature 584(7821), 437–442 (2020).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    L’Huillier, A. G. et al. Antibody persistence in the first 6 months following SARS-CoV-2 infection among hospital workers: A prospective longitudinal study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 27, 784.e1-784.e8 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Iyer, A. S., et al. Dynamics and significance of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. medRxiv. (2020).

  20. 20.

    Gaebler, C. et al. Evolution of antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Nature 591, 639–644 (2021).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sakurai, A. et al. Natural history of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 885–886 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Van Elslande, J. et al. Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 reinfection by a phylogenetically distinct strain. Clin. Infect. Dis73(2), 354–356 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gupta, V. et al. Asymptomatic reinfection in two healthcare workers from India with genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020).

  24. 24.

    Tillett, R. L. et al. Genomic evidence for reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: A case study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21(1), 52–58 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Adrielle Dos Santos, L. et al. Recurrent COVID-19 including evidence of reinfection and enhanced severity in thirty Brazilian healthcare workers. J. Infect. 82, 399–406 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mulder, M. et al. Reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 in an immunocompromised patient: a case report. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020).

  27. 27.

    Lee, J. S. et al. Evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reinfection after recovery from mild coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020).

  28. 28.

    Selhorst, P. et al. Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 reinfection of a health care worker in a Belgian nosocomial outbreak despite primary neutralizing antibody response. Clin. Infect. Dis. 130, 104575 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kurosaki, T., Kometani, K. & Ise, W. Memory B cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15(3), 149–159 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Liu, L. et al. High neutralizing antibody titer in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9(1), 1664–1670 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The study was funded by a research grant from the Sagol network for neuroscience established by Mr. Sami Sagol. This study was performed in collaboration with the Israeli Ministry of Health. We would like to thank Dr. Mechael Kanovsky for his editing of this manuscript.

Author information




S.E., and O.L.K., conceived and designed the study. R.A.H., A.B.C., and P.B.L. designed and conducted the experiments. M.C. performed the data analysis. S.E., M.C., and A.H. wrote the manuscript that was reviewed and accepted by all authors before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shai Efrati.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Efrati, S., Catalogna, M., Abu Hamad, R. et al. Safety and humoral responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination of SARS-CoV-2 previously infected and naive populations. Sci Rep 11, 16543 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing