Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

New evidence of a Roman road in the Venice Lagoon (Italy) based on high resolution seafloor reconstruction

Abstract

This study provides new evidence of the presence of an ancient Roman road in correspondence to a paleobeach ridge now submerged in the Venice Lagoon (Italy). New high resolution underwater seafloor data shed new light on the significance of the Roman remains in the lagoon. The interpretation of the data through archive and geo-archaeological research allowed a three-dimensional architectural reconstruction of the Roman road. The presence of the ancient Roman road confirms the hypothesis of a stable system of Roman settlements in the Venice Lagoon. The study highlights the significance of this road in the broader context of the Roman transport system, demonstrating once more the Roman ability to adapt and to handle complex dynamic environments that were often radically different from today.

Introduction

The Romans built a very efficient road system extending for tens of thousands of kilometres to connect all their territories1,2,3,4. Several portions of this ancient road network are still well preserved after more than two millennia in many archaeological sites in Europe, the Middle East and North Africa5. The transport system, however, was not limited to the routes on land, since the imperial control of the territory extended to transitional environments such as deltas, marshes, and lagoons6,7,8 and a capillary network of waterways was used for the exchanges of goods and the movement of people.

In this context, what was the role played by the Venice Lagoon, the largest lagoon in the Mediterranean Sea, surrounding the historical city of Venice (Italy) (Fig. 1)? We know that in Roman Times, the relative mean sea level was lower than today and large parts of the lagoon, which are now submerged, were accessible by land9,10,11,12,13. The fate of the Venice Lagoon, its origin and geological evolution have always been tightly linked to the relative mean sea level rise, that is now threatening the existence itself of the historical city and the lagoon island14,15.

Figure 1
figure1

(A) The study geographical setting in the North-East of Italy with the location of the Grado and Marano Lagoon (in the pink box, Figure A2 in Supplementary Material); (B) The bathymetry of the Venice Lagoon tidal channels and inlets120 and the study area in the northern part of the Venice lagoon. The yellow and green boxes represent the location of Figs. 2 and 6, respectively. Satellite image source: Esri DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA,USGS,AEX,Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, https://services.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/rest/services/World_Imagery/MapServer.

However, whereas the geological evolution of the Venice Lagoon has been investigated in several studies, less is known about the human presence in the lagoon before the foundation of the historical city. Similarly to what happened to many coastal areas in the Mediterranean area16,17 and in other parts of the world18,19,20,21, several archaeological remains were found underwater or even buried under the lagoon seafloor, many of which of Roman origin11. The significance of these Roman remains was the object of a long-running debate: starting from the pioneering works of Dorigo22 and Canal10,11,23, most studies show a diffuse occupation of the lagoon already in Roman Times24,25,26,27,28,29,30. Other studies, however, excluded the possibility of the existence of permanent structures and infrastructures before the V–VI century AD31,32,33: Venice was thought to be built in a ‘desert’ place without any previous traces of human presence and the Roman findings on and within the seafloor belonged to buildings in the mainland surrounding the lagoon.

Within this long-running debate, this multidisciplinary study supports the perspective of extensive Roman settlements in the Venice Lagoon, by presenting new high resolution multibeam echo-sounder data interpreted through the archive and geo-archaeological research and digital modelling. In particular, the paper aims to: (i) show the presence of an extended road feature in the shallowly submerged lagoonal context of Venice as an indication of the development of settlement, movement, and economy in the area during Roman Times; (ii) confirm the Roman ability to adapt and to handle complex dynamic environments that were often radically different from today and (iii) finally, stress the need to rediscover, document and preserve the archaeological remains in submerged or buried coastal landscape that may be threatened by human induced changes or relative mean sea level rise.

Results

The morpho-bathymetric reconstruction

The Venice Lagoon is located at the northern end of the Adriatic Sea at the eastern edge of the Venetian coastal plain (Fig. 1). The lagoon is separated from the sea by narrow sandy beach ridges, aligned in a SW-NE direction interrupted by three tidal inlets. It has an average depth of less than 1 m. Within the lagoon there are intertidal and submerged mudflats, salt marshes, channels, creeks, and islands. This study focused on the Treporti Channel in the Northern Lagoon (Figs. 1 and 2). The bathymetry map of the Treporti Channel shows the presence of a submerged ridge along the SW-NE direction. Over the ridge between 4.3 to 5.3 m water depth, there are 12 different morphological reliefs (from 1 to 12) aligned for about 1140 m, parallel to the main channel axis oriented in the SW-NE direction (Fig. 2, Table 1). Given the regular shape of the reliefs, we interpret them as anthropogenic features, possibly archaeological structures. The length of the structures 1–8, 11 and 12 varies from about 5 to 38 m. Their width ranges from about 2 to 10 m. In the bottom-right part of Fig. 2, we show structures 3, 8–9 that were the object of archaeological investigation that we will discuss further on. Structure 3 has an almost rectangular shape with a steep south-east side, a width of 6 m and a length of 48 m. The structures 8 is of smaller dimensions (4.8 m × 14.3 m), whereas structure 9 is elongated with a width of 9 m and length of 52.7 m. They are less coherent and made of sparse small reliefs intermittently distributed on a large area, whereas structure 10 has a more circular shape.

Figure 2
figure2

The Venice Lagoon and the bathymetry of the tidal channels. High resolution bathymetry of the Treporti Channel (DTM horizontal resolution 0.2 m, vertical exaggeration 5 x). The numbers 1 to 12 indicate the alignment of structures whose properties are summarized in Table 1. The letters a to d identify other structures found in the area. The zoom-in pictures show the detail of some of the archaeological structures: the sites 3, 8–9 and 10 (bottom-right) and the structure a (top-left), with the profiles I–II and III–IV, described in the text. The lower part of the picture represents the bathymetric profile extracted along all identified structures (white dashed line).

Table 1 Dimensions and depth of the structures on the Treporti Channel seafloor shown in Fig. 2.

Another group of structures, a, b, c in Fig. 2, lay deeper, at an average depth ranging between 8.7 and 9.3 m (Table 1), whereas the structure d is much shallower, with average depth of 2.8 m. The structure labelled by a (in the inset to the top left of Fig. 2), is the largest identified in the Treporti Channel occupying an area of more than 700 m\(^2\) with a total length of about 135 m and a maximum width of about 22 m. In the center, it has an almost circular structure with a section of about 15 m and 10–12 m in the perpendicular direction (profiles I–II and III–IV of Fig. 2).

The stratigraphical evidences

Four cores were extracted in 1985 under the structures 8–9 (Fig. 3) during and extended archaeological investigation (Fondo Nausicaa n. 1902). With a length varying from 0.5 to 0.9 m under the archaeological layer, all cores presented lagoonal sediments overlaid by an upper fine sand layer and microfauna typical of a littoral environment (Cores A–D, Fig. 3). The cores and the microfauna showed the transition from a shallow lagoon environment to a clearly littoral place due to the backing of the coastline.

Figure 3
figure3

Stratigraphy of cores extracted below the archaeological layer under the structures 8 and 9 (Fig. 2) and their position on the bathymetric map.

At a depth of about 5 m, the core C highlighted the presence of a layer of over consolidated clay with abundant carbonate concretions that was interpreted as the locally called “caranto” paleosol, lying under the lagoonal sediments. This paleosol formed by weathering as a result of sub-aerial exposure of the Pleistocene paleo-plain. It represents the last continental Pleistocene deposition marking the transition to the marine-lagoonal Holocene sediments34,35. The depth of this boundary varies within the lagoon area: it is more superficial at the inner margin of the lagoon deepening to the southeast, towards the Adriatic Sea36,37,38. This paleosol is not continuous and has a non-uniform pattern, with its ridges and dips having a fluvial origin38,39.

The archaeological evidence

The area was investigated in 1985 and in 2020 in correspondence to the sites 8–9 and 3, respectively (Figs. 2 and 3). As described in the report dated in 1986 (Fondo Nausicaa n. 1902), the first survey found a structure of an estimated length of 70 m, with a width varying from 5 to 7 m at an average depth ranging between 4 to 6 m. The structure was characterized by multiple lytic elements, which seemed to indicate, by morphology and disposition, the shape of an ancient road. The observed stones had an upper smooth face, whereas the lower part had an ovoidal shape (Fig. 4a,d). This lithic morphology was similar to the one of the Roman basoli, stones normally used to cover the upper surface of ancient roads. The basoli were disposed in parallel to the channel axis, as if they were following the SW-NE direction. Some of them are now preserved in the storage of the ‘Soprintendenza Archeologia, belle arti e paesaggio’ of Venice (Isola del Lazzaretto Nuovo, management: Gerolamo Fazzini); their dimensions are about 38 cm × 27 cm × 13 cm. The petrographic analysis of a thin section carried out by Lorenzo Lazzarini showed that the stones were in flyshoidal sandstone. During the diving inspection carried out in the 1980s, three clay vases were recovered: a small amphora with double handles (h about 45 cm: Fig. 4b,c), in which some traces of oily material were found (maybe rapeseed oil); a big amphora (h about 70 cm: Fig. 4e) without handles lacking the bottom that seems an example of the Dressel 6A type, dated at the I cent. BC–I cent. AD; a third small vase (h about 36 cm) of rough workmanship (Fig. 4f). The second and the third vases may date back to the late Antiquity-early Medieval age.

Figure 4
figure4

Upper part. Pictures of material discovered in the Treporti Channel in correspondence to the structure 8–9 (Figs. 2, 3) in 1985: (a) Basoli; (b,c) small amphora; (d) basoli on the seafloor; (e) Dressel 6A type amphora; (f) vase discovered in 1985; Lower part. Pictures extracted from the videos recorded by the divers of the Nucleo Sommozzatori della Polizia di Stato during the shooting of a documentary (see Supplementary Material) in different points along the structure 3, depicted in Fig. 3: (g) about 50 cm × 50 cm cubic stone found close to the flat stones; (h) preserved alignment of flat stones (basoli?); (i) inclined flat stone (basolo?) flanked by square stones in alignment; (j) detail of the square stone flanking the (basolo?).

The second investigation, carried out by divers in July 2020 during the shooting of a documentary (see Supplementary Material), focused on the structure 3 of Fig. 2. The divers collected seven videos along a transect parallel to the main axis of the structure 3. Analogously to what was found in 1985 for the structures 8 and 9, also in this case the videos collected by the divers showed the presence of numerous stone blocks: large squared blocks sparsely distributed (Fig. 4g) and stones in alignment laid flat on the bottom with compatible dimension to the standard roman basoli (Fig. 4h). In some part of the alignment, the flat blocks were laterally framed by larger stones (Fig. 4i,j).

Discussion

To interpret the dataset in a broader perspective, we first consider the geomorphological and archaeological background of the study area. Then, we compare the archaeological artifacts with similar examples elsewhere, reconsidering all the elements in a wider historical horizon.

Geomorphological background: the coastline position over the centuries

The geomorphological evolution of the Venetian coastal plain is summarized in40 and a general description of the geological and stratigraphic setting of the Venice Lagoon is provided by the Sheet 128 “Venezia”41 and the Sheet 148–149 “Chioggia-Malamocco”42 of the new Geological Map of Italy at the 1:50,000 scale (Carta Geologica d’Italia alla scala 1:50,000). The origin and evolution of Venice Lagoon is controlled by variations in relative sea level (RSL), related to the combined effects of eustasy, glacio-isostacy, and subsidence12,43,44,45.

The origin of the lagoon is set around 6000–7000 yrs BP46 as a consequence of the Holocene marine transgression. According to RSL curve reconstruction by Vacchi et al.47, the RSL in the area of the Venice and the Grado-Marano Lagoons was at \(-9.3\pm 0.8\) m at \(\sim 7.5\) ka BP rising to \(-5.5 \pm 0.8\) m at \(\sim 6.6\) ka BP and to about \(\sim -3\) m at \(\sim 5.5\) ka BP. During this transgression, the sea gradually flooded the alluvial palaeo-plain that occupied the northern epicontinental Adriatic shelf and several barrier-lagoon systems formed in progressively more inland positions48,49,50,51. According to the reconstruction based on the deep borehole VE 1 of about 950 m, drilled in Venice in 1971, a sedimentary record of Pleistocene and Holocene sand, silt, clay and peat underlay the lagoon52,53. Within this succession, the ‘caranto’, the last continental Pleistocene deposition, is a few decimeters to a few meters thick altered layer, which marks the transition to the marine-lagoonal Holocene sedimentation34,35. Above this layer there is the Holocene succession. This succession was described with very high spatial resolution thanks to seismic data, sedimentological, radiometric and micropalaeontological analyses in the northern54,55,56, central57,58,59 and southern lagoon60,61,62,63,64. These data allowed the reconstruction of the main ancient geomorphological features such as paleoriver beds, ancient tidal channels, ancient salt marshes and paleobeach ridges54,56,58,59,61,62,63.

The reconstruction of the Holocene succession identified different phases in the lagoon formation: (1) a first transgressive phase (from about 10,000 to 6500 B.P., with the end of the transgression set about 6000 yr B.P.), when a full back barrier depositional environment had formed; (2) a RSL stabilization phase characterized by an increase of sediment supply to the coast leading to deltaic and shallow-marine progradation that reached its maximum near Roman times64; (3) a second transgressive phase, in some sense accelerated by the human intervention, a sort of “human induced transgression”, that lasted until present63,64. Starting from the XIV century AD, major rivers (e.g. the rivers Bacchiglione, Brenta, Piave and Sile—Fig. 2) that were flowing into the lagoon were diverted to the north and to the south of the lagoon to avoid its silting up. In the last two centuries, other human modifications such as the construction of new jetties at the inlets, dredging of navigation channels and the more recent modifications on the inlets took place65,66,67.

In particular, the position of the coastline has changed over time. In the southern lagoon, different studies documented the presence of a paleobeach ridge indicating that the coastline had a more inland position during Roman Times37,39,61,63. In the central-southern lagoon, the reconstruction of Zecchin et al.64 and Donnici et al.59 suggest that the coastline position did not change much since Roman Times until present as it was hypothesized also by Bonardi et al.68. In the northern lagoon, instead, the coastline position varied over time in different climatic conditions showing inland migration during warm periods and seaward migration during climatic crises, respectively40,68. However, as observed in Vacchi et al.47, it is difficult to reconstruct the exact curve of the RSL in the late-Holocene: most likely due to compaction of the sediments, there is considerable scatter of the RSL index points (Fig. 5) for the area of the Venice Lagoon. These RSL points refer to internal areas of the Venice Lagoon, that could have had a rather different evolution of the area considered by the present work (Figs. 1, 2). This area underwent strong modifications over the last two millennia, making it hard to understand which could have been the local trend of RSL over time.

Figure 5
figure5

RSL data points (red dots) extracted from the database by Vacchi et al.47 and their location in the Venice Lagoon plotted as calibrated age against sea level relative to the present. The error bars represent the elevation and age errors.

According to the geomorphological reconstruction of Bonardi et al.40,68, a paleobeach ridge occupied the present Treporti Channel in this area (Fig. 6) during Roman Times (2100–1800 yr B.P.), at the end of the RSL stabilisation. On this paleobeach ridge, Bonardi et al.68 for the first time referred to a submerged and partially buried alignment of lithic material stretching for about 3 km along the channel. Some of these structures were interpreted as part of Roman defense and observation buildings. The paleobeach ridge was successively submerged by mean sea level rise and partially destroyed. The coastline then shifted back to the S. Erasmo island position in the second transgressive phase11,23,68. The S. Erasmo island represented the littoral strip with two different inlets to the south and to the north for many centuries, as it is also documented by historical maps69,70.

Figure 6
figure6

The position of the paleobeach ridge in the Treporti Channel in Roman Times (in yellow in transparency over the current satellite data) and the alignment of Roman lithic remains and levee road (red dots and lines), buildings (green squares) and brick walls (white pentagons); the map was modified from the Archaeological Map of the Venice Lagoon11. The pink solid line indicates the position of the structures reconstructed by this study (Fig. 2). Satellite image source: Esri DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA,USGS,AEX,Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, https://services.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/rest/services/World_Imagery/MapServer.

The current configuration of the inlet, with the formation of the Treporti Channel and the new littoral is very recent. This configuration is a consequence of the diversion of the Piave River to the north of the lagoon and of the construction of the Lido inlet jetties between 1882 and 191069,71. The sediments supplied by the Piave river and the presence of the jetties caused the deposition of large quantities of material to the north of the Lido inlet. In less than a few centuries, a new beach ridge (Treporti-Punta Sabbioni) and the Treporti Channel formed, reaching the present geomorphological configuration. This process is well documented by the direct quantitative comparison of the georeferenced historical bathymetry maps since 1809 to 200369,71: Balletti et al.69 showed that since 1809 to 2003 the Treporti Channel underwent a strong erosion process becoming much deeper (from 2 to 8 m), whereas Fontolan et al.71 estimated that the Punta Sabbioni beach has accreted at a rate of more than 10 m/yr. since 1886 to 2003.

Finally, the area probably experienced a strong subsidence rate with respect to the internal lagoon and the city of Venice, due to natural and anthropogenic causes39,65,72,73. The shallow Holocene deposits are heterogeneous within the lagoon generating different land movements: the presence of thicker unconsolidated deposits generally corresponds to the largest subsidence rates. In a recent study based on satellite SAR interferometric methods, Tosi et al.74 observed an average land displacement up to 25 mm/year in correspondence with the newly built structures for the mobile barriers (MoSE) at the Lido inlet. The historical city of Venice, instead, experienced a relative sea level rise equal to 26 cm related to land subsidence and climate change effects over the last century14. Currently, however, the city and the central lagoon seem to be relatively stable with an average land subsidence of 1–2 mm/year74.

Archaeological background: the Roman remains in the Venice Lagoon

Since the XVIII–XIX century AD, many scholars, historians and archaeologists have considered the Roman remains found in the Lagoon islands and channels as spolia from the Roman Venetian cities overlooking the lagoon. These spolia would have then been used for new buildings and decorative redeployments during the Medieval age and Renaissance. Mainly two factors contributed to the opinion that no Roman settlements could have been present in the Venice Lagoon before the V–VI century AD. First, the lagoon geomorphology changed greatly over the centuries. It was difficult to imagine an ancient landscape so different from the current one. The lagoon was seen as a separate space from the mainland, with few relations with the suburban areas of Patavium and Altinum, the Roman cities overlooking the Venice Lagoon. Secondly, only a minimal part of the buried and submerged findings and excavations made from the 1990s up to the beginning of the 2000s have been published.

The major ‘supporters’ of ancient settlements in the lagoon have been Ernesto Canal and Wladimiro Dorigo. During the 1980–1990s, thanks to surveys in the lagoon and archival-archaeological research11,22,23,75,76, they tried to demonstrate the existence of several Roman (and Pre-Roman) settlements in the Venice Lagoon. In their view, archaeological layers and ancient artefacts represented the traces of an extensive occupation of the lagoon until the birth of Venice in VIII–IX century AD. At the same time, Braccesi77 proposed new interpretations of ancient literary sources strengthening the hypothesis of an inhabited lagoon since Ancient Times.

The territory of Altinum (Figs. 1 and 6) probably extended with its harbour elements into the contemporary lagoon78,79,80,81. Some buildings in the modern Palude di Cona and Palude Centrega were interpreted as harbour structures and infrastructures of the ancient Roman city of Altinum (Fig. 6, 12311) or as residential buildings82. These structures may have been connected by levees-walkways now submerged and excavated in some places of the lagoon83. Furthermore, the archaeological diggings realized in Torcello84,85,86,87, with some new data also from archival research26, testified to the presence of Roman levels under the Medieval layers. This presence has been interpreted as proof of the existence of a private settlement during the imperial phase (a Roman villa?26,30), abandoned during the late Antiquity; then, a new phase of settlement occurred in the VI–VII century AD88, when the first Christian church was built. Important data also emerged from the studies and several stratigraphic diggings on Medieval sites in the lagoon89,90,91. The theory of a lagoon with Roman diffuse settlements, however, has still been opposed even recently92.

The reconstructive hypothesis

The geomorphological studies reconstructed a different shoreline position during the Roman age (Fig. 6), with respect to the positions in pre-Roman and the Medieval phases. Here, the long coastal seaside could have been frequented at least in the Roman phase. The bathymetry data confirms the presence of a paleobeach ridge in the Treporti Channel (from now on, TC paleobeach ridge; Fig. 2). The alignment of the artifacts (structures 1–12, Fig. 2) extends on this paleobeach ridge, with the structures having about 4/6 m of depth, in agreement with what was found by the archaeological investigation in 1985 and by what was written by Canal11. The artifacts, however, lay below the available RSL values in the Venice Lagoon (Fig. 5), that vary between \(-1 \pm 0.7\) m (point 13), \(-1.4 \pm 1.2\) m (point 10) and \(-0.7 \pm 0.7\) m (point 11) in Roman Times (about 2100–1800 years BP). As discussed before, this could possibly be related to the strong changes in terms of erosion and subsidence that occurred in the area.

In his book, Canal described two main sites in this area, labelled with the codes 113.2b and 113.3 (see Fig. 7 for the location). Canal found that the site 113.2b was about 70 m long corresponding to the sites 8 and 9 of Fig. 2, whereas the site 113.3 was a very extended area (300 m) characterized, again, by a straight alignment of stone blocks arranged similarly to an ancient Roman road. Several fragments of roof tiles (embrici), sesquipedalian bricks, amphorae and other Roman vases were found around it). The diving inspection carried out in 2020 highlighted the presence of aligned stones also in correspondence to structure 3 (Figs. 2 and 4).

Figure 7
figure7

Reconstruction of the Treporti Channel paleobeach ridge and the Treporti Channel road (TC road)in Roman Times: (a) from an aerial perspective, with the Venice lagoon to the left and the Adriatic Sea to the right. The position of the TC road corresponds exactly to the position of the archaeological structures mapped (Fig 2), whereas the extension of the TC paleobeach ridge is only hypothetical since the area has been radically modified over the centuries; (b) a zoom-in view and (c) section of the TC road based on the stratigraphy of the cores extracted under the basoli (Fig. 3).

The discovery of the submerged structures of Fig. 2 confirms and further extends what was found by the archaeological investigation in 1985, described also by Canal11. In its current configuration, the alignment of the discovered artifacts extends for more than a thousand meters (1140 m) along the SW-NE direction with a width ranging from 2 to 10 m. They can be interpreted as residues of an ancient road, from now on called the Treporti Channel road (TC road), recognizable by the typical blocks of smooth stone on the surface, in this case sandstone, and the wedge-shape in their lower part.

The digital reconstruction illustrates this interpretative hypothesis (Fig. 7a): the TC paleobeach ridge is drawn between the Adriatic Sea (to the right) and the ancient lagoon (to the left) offering an overview of the ancient TC road. The digital and interactive system is the final step of a long procedural process starting from the reading and the analysis of the multibeam data to obtain a philological reconstruction of the lost ancient reality. Thus, the rendering of the TC road corresponds exactly to the position of the archaeological structures shown in Fig. 2. The extension of the TC paleobeach ridge, instead, can only be hypothesized: strong geomorphological changes occurred in the area in the last two millennia and the current bathymetry probably shows only what remains of the TC paleobeach ridge submerged and partially eroded over the centuries.

The reconstruction of the TC paleobeach ridge includes also elements of vegetation (Fig. 7a,b). Vegetation remains were found in the cores extracted under the structures 8–9 of the TC road (Figs. 2 and 3). Furthermore, traces of vegetation were recorded at 8–10 m in different other sites (Fig. 6, 113.6), as well as remains of minor paths: the traces found could suggest that along the coast it was possible to go through a land with luxuriant vegetation, maybe used for agricultural purposes too. The presence of vegetation has been recently confirmed and expanded in a study dedicated to the reconstruction of the plant landscape of the Venice Lagoon thanks to archaeobotanical findings93.

The setting of the TC road in the Venice Lagoon

To the north-east of TC paleobeach ridge, an ancient building, possibly a defensive tower, was found (Fig. 6, 113.9). The building (dimensions about 8 × 8 m) was paved with sesquipedalian bricks, around which some Roman embrices, amphoras, glass and pottery fragments were found11,24,25. In the south-west part of TC paleobeach ridge, another similar ancient submerged defensive tower was identified (Fig. 6, 112). It had a square plan and was built with square stone blocks. As pointed out by Canal11, the TC road could have connected these two far-ends over the TC paleobeach ridge (Fig. 2, 113.2b) that separated the Adriatic Sea to the lagoon.

The presence of the TC road was probably related to the presence of waterways inside the lagoon. The paths of two natural ancient channels reconstructed by Canal are pictured in Fig. 6: a freshwater channel collected the waters of the rivers Sile-Piave from the land to the sea (Canale Cenesa in green in Fig. 6) and a salty channel extended from Torcello to Treporti (in light blue in Fig. 611). The latter possibly represented the favourite route for transports from the Adriatic Sea to the Altinum harbour (and vice versa). The harbour, as we anticipated above, was probably located south of Altinum, close to the Scanello Channel, between the Palude di Cona and the Palude Centrega (Fig. 6) where multiple archaeological traces were found11,23,25. They seem to belong to big buildings, among which two possible warehouses (47 m × 42 m and 50 m × 46 m) with columns (base 2 m), structures for the port activities. The goods could have then reached the city thanks to the artificial channel called the ‘Sioncello’, realized during the I century BC: it was an inland waterway with mooring quay, that unified the Sile river (at that time a Piave branch) with the S. Maria channel78,94. Also, in the Scanello Channel, Canal11 identified the remains of what he considered a Roman road (Fig. 6, 123).

This would imply that the TC road was not an isolated infrastructure, but it was linked to other structures and infrastructures in the lagoon that served the circuit of the goods to and from Altinum. Indeed, other archaeological excavations in this area discovered remains of numerous levees-walkways now submerged83. Canal refers also to the presence of a levee-walkaway in the S. Felice Channel at NW of the TC road (Fig. 6, 113.19), that is documented also by Fozzati and Toniolo83. It was 12 m long at 6/8 m of depth and it was made of a wooden caging, amphorae, infill materials and stone blocks to cover the top of the way (depicted in Figure A1 in the Supplementary Material). In some points, amphorae Dressel 6A type, Dressel 7/11 and ‘north italic amphorae’ types dated at the I–II century AD constituted the base of the road. Fragments of plaster, a mortar, a dice cup, and other vases/amphorae dated at late Antiquity were found too. The amphorae of Dressel 6A type found in the Treporti Channel (Fig. 4e) can be compared with the ones used in the San Felice Channel for the base of the levee-walkway. The presence of late vases in both cases could be considered, in future detailed studies, as a marker of a restoration of the paths, as proposed by Fozzati and Toniolo83.

However, no traces of a wooden caging were found for the TC road. The presence of the “caranto” paleosol found in one of the cores under the TC road (station C, Fig. 3) could explain why: the TC road was probably built on a morphologically high (supratidal) hard substrate. The Pleistocene-Holocene boundary was higher in this area, as it was first shown by the comparative study of 18 cores extracted in the 1970s along the littoral strips36,95. In station C (Fig. 3), the “caranto” was found at a depth of about 5 m, i.e., at a much shallower position in comparison with other locations close to the littoral (see for example cores described in Rizzetto et al37, and Donnici et al35). This is confirmed also by the reconstruction of the Pleistocene-Holocene boundary depth in the area by Brambati et al39. The “caranto” palaeosol deposits are consolidated and much harder and resistant to deformation35. The basoli would have been then laid directly on the firm ground as shown in Fig. 7b,c. The piles needed to build levees-walkways in soft, muddy sediments, would not have been necessary on the firm sandy silt sediments overlying the “caranto” paleosol. In other words, the construction of the road was probably adapted to the topography, geomorphology, and ground conditions.

In this regard, Xeidakis and Varagouli96 documented the different construction techniques for the northern Greek part of the Roman Via Egnatia crossing the Balkan Peninsula. They observed that the foundation conditions determined the thickness and layering of the pavement: “In stable, rocky ground, the pavement consisted of only one layer of well-fitted cobble stones; whereas, in soft and unstable ground the soft soil was excavated and replaced by several layers of cobbles, gravels and rubbles held together with compacted sandy soil or lime mortar. [...] The thickness of the pavement varied from 25 cm to more than 150 cm”.

Matteazzi drew similar conclusions in his review study about the technical construction choices of Roman roads in northern Italy97. The foundation of the roads he investigated presented only one or two layers of material such as gravel, sand or clay, sometimes enriched by fragments of stones or bricks. This modest structure is quite different from the one testified by the archaeological studies in central Italy98. Matteazzi concluded as well that this is related to the geological substrate of the Po Plain, where banks of consolidated clay guaranteed the solidity of the road structure without the need of complex foundations, that were instead necessary for humid swampy areas.

Finally, we cannot even exclude that the TC road was used as tow paths for the journeys in the Venice Lagoon in a complex infrastructural system. In fact, if we consider also the southern part of the study area, the presence of the structure a (Fig. 2) to the south-west of the Treporti channel could possibly represent a large harbour structure located at the southern edge of the TC paleobeach ridge with a long wall and a central tower probably located in correspondence to a southern entrance to the lagoon40,68. This structure could correspond to the sites 113.2a identified by Canal (Fig. 6), who did not describe it but indicated it in the map with the symbol of a Roman wall. Its dimension (15 × 10–12 m, Profiles I–II and II–IV, respectively, in Fig. 2) are comparable to those of the building found in the S. Felice Channel interpreted as a possible defensive tower or a lighthouse11,23,24,25 (Fig. 6, 112). This structure, however, lay much deeper (8–9 m) than the current depth of the TC road (about 4–5 m). Possibly, the TC road was built on a supratidal zone, whereas the structure could have been a harbour structure built in the intertidal zone in correspondence of an ancient inlet. Thus, the structure could have been more exposed to storm-wave pounding causing its subsidence in the sand. Indeed, different rates of natural and anthropogenic subsidence have been observed in the Venice Lagoon with recent higher vertical displacements close to the inlets43,73. Also, the comparative analysis of historical hydrographic maps show that strong erosive processes have occurred in the last century close to the Lido inlet69: the southern part of the investigated area (depicted in Fig. 2) deepened by 3 to 6 m between 1897 to 2003, i.e., after the construction of the jetties in the Lido inlet.

Moreover, the structure could have been originally built, at least partly, under water like harbour installations such as breakwaters, jetties, docks17. However, further archaeological investigation is needed to determine the functional elevation of the structure, namely the relationship between the emerged part of the archaeological remains compared to past and present mean sea level16,99.

A comparison with the Lagoons of Grado and Marano

An overview to the maritime landscape of Aquileia represents a valid comparison with the Venice Lagoon case study with a focus on the Grado and Marano Lagoons, that have stringent affinities with the basin of Altinum. Recent studies about the Grado Lagoon have demonstrated the wide extension of the land in the Roman age in the area now submerged100. From the late Republic phase to the early Empire there was a big flat area with infrastructures linked both to the rivers and to the maritime trades: there were residential and harbour settlements, as well as places used for cult and funerary purposes (Figure A2 in Supplementary Material). Among the archaeological sites, there were some storages (at Marina di Macia and in the seabed of Groto/Island of Pampagnola), docks, moorings, private buildings (at Le Cove), that contributed to offer a first stop and refreshment to people who were sailing for long periods. They seem similar to the buildings found in the northern Venice Lagoon between the Treporti and Lio Piccolo areas.

These ancient sites in the Grado Lagoon now submerged were served both by waterways (channels) and roads. In particular, a ‘speaking’ site, i.e., the place Pietre/Piere (Stones) of Sant’Agata-San Gottardo (S. Gottardo in Figure A1 in Supplementary Material), is located in the sea at 600 m from the current dam of Grado and at 3 m of depth101. The site is characterised by an alignment of stones that has been interpreted as a road or a quay. De Grassi suggested the importance of the several funeral artefacts discovered through the years between the Grado beach and the ‘Ruins of S. Gottardo’.

A second, important example of a submerged road seen in the Grado Lagoon connected the sea to Aquileia: it is a long road close to the modern sites of Morsano and Grotto, near the Groto-Pampagnola Island, the Gorgo Island-Villa Nova, and the area of Morsano (Figure A2 in Supplementary Material, red dashed line). Here, a big structure constituted by an alignment of walls for over 40 m has been interpreted as part of the harbour of the Aquileia Lagoon, perhaps with a wood pier100. Overall, the Grado finds offer a strong comparison with the Treporti Channel in the Venice Lagoon, showing a clear example of routes that guaranteed the land passage in an ancient lagoon of the north Adriatic Sea.

The Marano Lagoon presents further examples to be compared with the Venice Lagoon (Figure A2 in Supplementary Material). The lagoon formed about 7500 years ago and in the Roman age it presented some emerged areas, that were progressively submerged102; only a few places have been preserved dry thanks to a water-scooping system realized at the beginnings of the XX century103. In this case, as well, the submersion of the archaeological lands depended on multiple factors: the natural subsidence, climate change, as well as the anthropogenic action, such as, for instance, the creation of wells and the consequent exploitation of groundwater. The Marano basin is much shallower than the Venice Lagoon with an average depth of about 70 cm: for this reason, in this area the archaeological diggings have been convenient, and the consistency of the archaeological remains has been easier to document.

The Marano Lagoon was located between the sea mouths of the Anaxum-Stella, Alsa-Aussa, Corno rivers and it was useful for all the network of trades linked to Aquileia104,105. As in the case of Altinum, three types of routes could have connected Aquileia: (i) the land route, thanks to the consular roads in the Augustan Venetia et Histria Regio created by Rome starting from the constitution of Aquileia in 181 BC106; (ii) the sea route, in the Adriatic courses sailed from the Mycenaean and Pre-Roman age107; (iii) the internal waters route, strengthened by the artificial channels that defended the sailors from bad weather and piracy22,76. The most famous artificial channel that linked the Marano Lagoon to Aquileia was the Canale Anfora13,108,109,110: as in the case of the Sioncello Channel in the Altinum Lagoon, it represented a navigable route integrated into the local hydrography and it was coherently oriented along the Aquileia centuriation during the Flavian Empire.

Which road system in the ancient Venice Lagoon?

The different archaeological contexts mentioned above offer comparisons with the case study of the Treporti Channel in the Venice Lagoon presenting similar types of settlements. The road system in the Aquileia basin is well documented by the submerged route that linked the Grado Lagoon to Aquileia. In the case of the Venice Lagoon the road system is still to be defined because of two elements. On the one hand, the lack of wide-ranging underwater stratigraphic excavations, on the other hand, a widespread reticence also in the academic field to recognise an ancient landscape largely emerged and therefore crossed and inhabited.

The elements highlighted by the multibeam survey in the Treporti Channel connected to the geo-archaeological underwater findings, allow us to start outlining the ancient viability in the maritime area of the Venetia, even if only in a small section (Fig. 8). This viability was not limited to scattered paths, but it was linked to the wide road Roman network that offered convenient passages in all the Veneto territory, both in its continental extension and in its lagoon spaces. In fact, as in all the ancient Po valley, the road system of the Veneto Region included different routes (Fig. 8). There were the consular roads built between the II century BC and the I century AD (via Postumia, Annia, Popillia, Claudia Augusta106, from which minor paths allowed one to reach secondary sites (in green in Fig. 8). There were the river routes, that guaranteed the transports of goods for long distances thanks to complex infrastructures. But there were also the famous fossae per transversum, the artificial channels dug in the ancient lagoons between the mouths of the rivers, that extended parallel of the littoral coasts and that allowed an internal save navigation, avoiding the open sea25,111,112 (in light blue and blue in Fig. 8).

Figure 8
figure8

(Left) Roman road and waterways network in the Augustan Venetia et Histria Regio in the North-East Italy. (Right) zoom on the Venice Lagoon showing the fossa Popilliola in blue (after Dorigo22) and the hypothetical path of the Roman road along the littoral in red, with the TC road segment in purple and the segment reconstructed from Canal11 (Fig. 6, 123), in yellow. Satellite image source: Esri DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community, https://services.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/rest/services/World_Imagery/MapServer.

It is possible then to reconsider the TC road within the wider perspective of the Roman viability in the ancient Veneto Region: the submerged road represented the last section of a vast route system both on land and water starting from the south, in correspondence with the contemporary city of Chioggia. It further continued northward crossing the modern Malamocco littoral, where the harbour of the ancient river Meduacus has been pinpointed (the sea harbour of Patavium-Padova; the toponym derives from the ancient name of the river Metamaukos/Meduacus, that in Antiquity flowed here113); finally, it ended in the Northern Venice Lagoon and possibly continued until the Aquileia basin. This route system, protected from coastal storms and piracy, provided both land paths, as the case of the TC road, and waterways allowing the boats to pass from one end of the northern Adriatic Sea to the other. These channels had such a strategic role—political, economic, and social—, that Plinius the Older described in a famous page of his Naturalis Historia (Plin. nat. III, 119–121).

The enhancement of the land and water viability, already started by the Etruscans, has to be referred to the Augustan project to unify the Italian peninsula: the tota Italia mentioned by the Princeps himself in his Res Gestae (Res Gestae, 25, 1–2114), after the conquer of the Alps and the submission of all the people of the Cisalpine territories. The Augustan project provided a new management and a new re-organization of the infrastructural system of the north-eastern Adriatic area, starting from the constitution of two harbours at Ravenna: the harbour of Classis, for the allocation of part of the imperial fleet, and the harbour of Ravenna, dedicated to trade activities. From here, the channels already made during the Pre-Roman phase were renovated. Unifying different river mouths (of the Po, Adige, Brenta, Sile-Piave rivers), the internal lagoon routes included the fossa Augusta, that linked Ravenna to Spina, the fossa Flavia between Spina and Adria, the fossa Clodia from Adria to Chioggia, finally a channel, mentioned in Medieval sources, called fossa Popilliola, that allowed the passage from Chioggia to Altinum and beyond76 (Fig. 8). This artificial channel coincided with an itinerary that started from the consular road Via Popillia (made by P. Pupillius Lenas in 132 BC) from Rimini to Altinum (an important example of a Pre-Roman docking that become a Roman mansio in front of the lagoon is attested at San Basilio, Ariano Polesine-Adria115). Close to the mansio Maio Meduaco (today Sambruson, near Dolo), the Via Popillia was unified to the consular road Via Annia until Aquileia, with multiple ‘service stations’ along the way. It was an amazing viability project, providing the choice among different routes by land or by water, diffusely connected with facilities for breaks or stops, for water provisions, and for selling activities. These journeys in the north-east Adriatic area may have been integrated in multiple itineraries over the Alps passing through the via Claudia Augusta: this famous consular road started by land in Altinum but, as proposed in a recent and deepened study116, it could begin in a maritime path from the fossa Augusta, to pass through the Venice Lagoon and to arrive in Altinum. From here it continued by land, until Tridentum and the Danube area.

Conclusions

This multidisciplinary study documented the presence of an about 1200 m long segment of a submerged Roman road (called for simplicity TC road) on an ancient beach ridge now submerged in the Northern Venice Lagoon. The high resolution underwater acoustic data collected was interpreted in light of geological data, archaeological excavations and comparisons with similar environments and archaeological contexts. In the attempt to preserve this precious underwater cultural heritage, we presented a reconstructive hypothesis and a 3D digitization of the the paleobeach ridge and of the TC road, that are currently endangered by erosion and subsidence processes.

The submerged road represents, probably, one of the last route segments in the maritime landscape of Altinum, within a wider network of roads in the Venetia et Histria Regio. Its contiguity with other structures and infrastructures, such as for instance defensive towers, levees-walkways, port, and private structures, confirms the capillary permanent settlement in the Venetorum angulus. This area was crossed by travellers and sailors, namely the viatores et velatores, to which the freedwoman Aufidia Venusta wished good health in a funeral inscription found at Portomaggiore, close to Ferrara (EDR140752 = CIL 05, 02402 = Suppl It, 17, 1999, p. 150):

Aufidiae C(ai) l(ibertae) Venust[a]e/viatores et velatores salvete/et bene valete.

Methods

The high-resolution seafloor mapping

Detailed geoarchaeological observations and analyses were carried out in the Treporti channel. We studied the seafloor geomorphology of this area thanks to underwater acoustic remote sensing. During an extensive survey carried out in 2013, the high resolution multibeam data were collected with a Kongsberg EM-2040 DC dual-head system with 800 beams (400 per swath). The MBES was pole-mounted on the bow of the vessel RV Litus, a 10-m long boat with 1.5-m draft. The frequency of MBES was set to 360 kHz. A Seapath 300 system provided the position corrected with a Fugro HP differential Global Positioning System (dGPS, accurate to 0.20 m). The Kongsberg MRU5 inertial motion sensor corrected pitch, roll, heave and yaw movements (0.02° roll and pitch accuracy, 0.075° heading accuracy). A Valeport mini SVS sensor mounted close to the transducers measured continuously the sound velocity for the beam forming. Sound velocity profiles were systematically collected with an AML oceanographic Smart-X sound velocity profiler. Data were logged, displayed, and checked in real-time with the Kongsberg native data acquisition and control software SIS (Seafloor Information System). The processing of the raw data was done with the software CARIS HIPS and SIPS117 (v.9) that accounted for sound velocity variations, tides and basic quality controls. A set of 93 virtual tidal stations evenly distributed in the study area, served for tidal correction: a virtual tidal station, was used for each field sheet of CARIS created for the data collected in a single day of survey. The tidal corrections in each virtual tidal station were calculated using the water level simulated by the hydrodynamic model SHYFEM118,119 applied to the whole Venice Lagoon with assimilation of tide gauge observations. All the depths are referred to the local mean sea level datum ‘Punta Salute 1897’. The bathymetric grids were exported from CARIS as text files with grid resolutions ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 m. They were converted to 32-bit raster files using Global Mapper (v12) (see further details in Madricardo et al.120).

The morphology of the sites and their surrounding areas were studied through the analysis of Digital Terrain Models (DTM) obtained from the bathymetric grids with a resolution of 0.2 m. They were analyzed with the software ArcGIS (v10.2)121. The visual interpretation of the DTMs was the basic tool for detecting traces of the archaeological structures. The recognized elements were drawn and all the information concerning each structure were automatically extracted using the tools Add feature attributes, Boundary and Focal statistics to extract the area, perimeter, maximum width and length, the minimum, maximum and mean depth of each structure.

Underwater archeological inspections

Underwater archaeological researches were carried out in the Treporti Channel between 1978 and 2016. In particular, the first survey was realized by Antonio e Paolo Molino, Eros Turchetto and Paolo Zanetti on behalf of the ‘Soprintendenza Archeologica del Veneto’ between July and November 1985. The report written about this survey represents the starting point of our archaeological study. During the survey, the underwater operations were particularly difficult due to strong currents and intense boat traffic. The investigation had the main objectives of determining exactly the location of the site and the extension of the archaeological evidence, characterizing the materials and the substrate composition of the area.

To identify the site, divers carried out parallel transects putting in the middle of the area a buoy as a reference to extract the geographical coordinates in the moment of slack water in the tidal cycle when the current was practically absent. The coordinates of the buoy where then calculated with a sextant measuring the angle with two known points on the mainland and other reference points were measured at the site extremes. The morphology and the different depths of the site were then measured by divers with the help of a metered pile and a level. The main direction of the site was determined with the help of a compass.

Four sediment cores were extracted at the same depth of 4.5 m under the lithic layer in order to characterize the site substrate. The cores were collected with a PVC tube with a diameter of 4 cm and a length of 1 m. The recovered cores were then analyzed in the lab to extract sedimentological and micropalaeontological records. Two lithic elements were collected, and thin sections were extracted for the minero-petrographic analysis. The operators used a water dredge working as a suction device to remove sediment from the seabed and to study the structure. In July 2020, further video documentation was acquired by the divers of the Polizia di Stato in the Treporti Channel by mean of a camera Canon EOS 60D following a transect in the direction NE-SW in the Treporti Channel in correspondence with the structure 3 identified with the MBES (Fig. 2).

The 3D digitization

In a project of digitization of a cultural asset, it is possible to distinguish several consecutive and sequential phases. The metric and configuration survey is entrusted with the first phase of reading, and it currently uses the most modern technologies applied to this field—in this case the high-resolution MBES. The next phase consists in the elaboration and optimisation of the data obtained with reverse engineering techniques through digital modelling software for the creation of clones characterised by geometric-mathematical specifications122. The final phase deals with digital systems of cataloguing and diffusion of the asset through innovative techniques of immersive media: video mapping, apps for mobile devices, augmented reality, immersive \(360 ^\circ\) videos, etc., which nowadays guarantee an easily usable and involving diffusion of the conceptual contents typical of an artefact under analysis123.

If the ultimate purpose of the entire work program is the creation of the digital clone, then it is perhaps useful to underline that the model, both digital and physical, must immediately abandon the ambition to structure itself as a ‘faithful copy’ of the real data. This model must be structured as a semantic one, with a strong critical and interpretative character, capable of storing and communicating not only the visible form (or the form reconstructed based on archive documentation) but also, and above all, the most intimate and profound meaning of that same form. It is precisely the meaning of the form that gives that asset the adjective ‘cultural’, and the model cannot and must not ignore that meaning. The reconstructive hypothesis of the coast of the Treporti area in Roman Times (Fig. 8), therefore, is obtained through a reverse modelling process in order to deduce the object shape representation from the digital acquisition of the physical model. In this specific case, the three-dimensional survey data collected through the MBES were integrated with a series of heterogeneous data obtained mostly from archive and geo-archaeological data in order to propose a possible visual reconstruction of the places that are now ‘submerged’, both physically and in the historic memory.

The first step concerned the transformation of the discrete three-dimensional model (point cloud) into a polygonal mesh model. The point cloud is a set of points characterised by their position in an XYZ coordinate system and by intensity values and/or RGB values, in case of a 3D laser scanner or photogrammetric survey. In this specific case, the values provided by the bathymetric survey were only of metric nature, that is XYZ. For the purposes of the three-dimensional modelling, the point cloud constitutes the metric starting point, a dotted model that cannot be modified. On the other hand, the polygonal mesh is a polyhedral surface characterised by flat facets, usually triangular or quadrangular. These types of models give an appreciation of the geometric trend of the surveyed object’s surface. Mesh models, because of their characteristics, are the most commonly used to create the efficient topological models of surfaces with casual variation—such as soils and depths—, the so-called Digital Terrain Model. The meshing process consisted in the realization of a triangular Triangular Irregular Network (TIN) mesh using the reverse engineering software Geomagic Design X (https://it.3dsystems.com/software/geomagic-design-x). The triangles of the mesh have sides that connect the set of the dots measured on the object, with the geometric characteristic of uniquely identifying a flat surface in space. The result is therefore a polyhedral surface composed of triangular elements.

The archaeological evidence was subsequently identified on the mesh surface and became the remarkable points on which cross sections of the model were extracted. These sections were the starting point for the construction of the new digital model—the hypothetical reconstruction one. In this phase, which was developed in the digital environment of Rhinoceros (https://www.rhino3d.com/it/), NURBS (Non-uniform rational B-spline) digital modeler, the data of the survey were integrated by the geo-archaeological and archive data to allow the reconstruction of the curves supporting the model. Then, the new section curves were interpolated and generated a continuous mathematical surface. The geometry represented by NURBS modelers is mathematical and it can represent any type of surface accurately and continuously. The model was then rendered with the software Cinema4D (https://www.maxon.net/en/products/cinema-4d/overview/) and V-ray (https://www.chaosgroup.com/). The rendering engines can simulate and graphically replicate a series of physical phenomena like shadows, reflection, caustics, subsurface, scattering and ambient occlusion, to cite a few of them. The mathematical model created by NURBS was imported in Cinema 4D, where each surface was associated with a different material to simulate the reality (water, soil, stone, etc.), adding also the solar light, i.e. the so called “physical sky”. After the setting of these parameters, the cameras were positioned to obtain different perspectives and then the rendering procedure was launched to obtain the desired views (Fig. 7).

References

  1. 1.

    Talbert, R. J. Barrington Atlas of the Greek and Roman World: Map-by-map Directory Vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Laurence, R. The Roads of Roman Italy: Mobility and Cultural Change (Routledge, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Staccioli, R. A. The Roads of the Romans (Getty Publications, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Basso, P. Strade romane: storia e archeologia Vol. 289 (Carocci, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kolb, A. Roman Roads: New Evidence-New Perspectives (Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2019).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Attema, P. & de Haas, T. Villas and farmsteads in the Pontine region between 300 BC and 300 AD: a landscape archaeological approach. Roman Villas Around the Urbs. Interaction with Landscape and Environment, 97–112 (2005).

  7. 7.

    Ferrari, K. et al. Wetlands in the river delta plains: Evolution, values and functions during the Roman times. The coastal landscape close to the Garigliano river mouth. Geocarrefour 88, 273–283 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    de Haas, T. Managing the marshes: An integrated study of the centuriated landscape of the Pontine plain. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 15, 470–481 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ammerman, A. J., McClennen, C. E., De Min, M. & Housley, R. Sea-level change and the archaeology of early Venice. Antiquity 73, 303–312 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Canal, E. & Cavazzoni, S. Variazione dei livelli marini nella laguna di Venezia dedotti dai dati archeologici. Quaderni di Archeologia del polesine, II, Linea AGS, Stanghella, Padova, 122–131 (2001).

  11. 11.

    Canal, E. Archeologia della laguna di Venezia: 1960–2010 (Cierre edizioni, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lambeck, K. et al. Sea level change along the Italian coast during the Holocene and projections for the future. Quat. Int. 232, 250–257 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fontana, A. et al. Lagoonal settlements and relative sea level during Bronze Age in Northern Adriatic: Geoarchaeological evidence and paleogeographic constraints. Quat. Int. 439, 17–36 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Trincardi, F. et al. The 1966 flooding of Venice: What time taught us for the future. Oceanography 29, 178–186 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cavaleri, L. et al. The 2019 flooding of Venice and its implcation for future predictions. Oceanography 33, 42–49 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Auriemma, R. & Solinas, E. Archaeological remains as sea level change markers: A review. Quat. Int. 206, 134–146 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Benjamin, J. et al. Late Quaternary sea-level changes and early human societies in the central and eastern Mediterranean Basin: An interdisciplinary review. Quat. Int. 449, 29–57 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bailey, G. N., Harff, J. & Sakellariou, D. Under the Sea: Archaeology and Palaeolandscapes of the Continental shelf Vol. 20 (Springer, 2017).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Benjamin, J. et al. Underwater archaeology and submerged landscapes in Western Australia. Antiquity 92 (363), (2018).

  20. 20.

    Rasul, N. M. I. C. Geological Setting, Palaeoenvironment and Archaeology of the Red Sea (Springer, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ford, B., Halligan, J. J. & Catsambis, A. Our Blue Planet: An Introduction to Maritime and Underwater Archaeology (Oxford University Press, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dorigo, W. Fra il dolce e il salso: origini e sviluppi della civiltà lagunare (Cierre Edizioni, SD, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Canal, E. Testimonianze archeologiche nella Laguna di Venezia: l’età antica: appunti di ricerca (Edizioni del Vento, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    D’Agostino, M., Fozzati, L., Lezziero, A., Marchesini, M. & Medas, S. Il paesaggio costiero antico nella Laguna nord di Venezia: recenti acquisizioni dall’archeologia subacquea. In Terre di mare. L’archeologia dei paesaggi costieri e le variazioni climatiche. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi, Trieste 8–10 (2008).

  25. 25.

    D’Agostino, M. & Medas, S. Roman navigation in Venice Lagoon: The results of underwater research. Int. J. Naut. Archaeol. 39, 286–294 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bassani, M. Antichità lagunari: scavi archeologici e scavi archivistici Vol. 29 (L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rosada, G. & Zabeo, M. ... Stagna... inrigua aestibus maritimis... Sulla laguna di Venezia ovvero su un comprensorio a morfologia variabile. Histria antiqua 21, 241–262 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fozzati, L. Il primo popolamento della laguna. In VENEZIA, La Regina del Mare e delle Arti, 30–32 (Biblos, Cittadella, 2013).

  29. 29.

    Fozzati, L., Calaon, D., Zendri, E. & Biscontin, G. Torcello scavata. Patrimonio condiviso. 1. Gli scavi 1995-2012 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Calaon, D. La Venetia maritima tra il VI e il IX sec: mito, continuità e rottura. In Dalla catalogazione alla promozione dei beni archeologici. I progetti europei come occasione di valorizzazione del patrimonio culturale veneto (eds Bodon, G. et al.), 53–66 (Regione Veneto, Mestrino, 2016).

  31. 31.

    Azzara, C. Venetiae: determinazione di un’area regionale fra antichità e alto medioevo Vol. 4 (Canova, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gasparri, E. Tardoantico e medioevo: metodologie di ricerca e modelli intepretativi. In Storia d’Europa e del Mediterraneo, Dal Medioevo all’età della Globalizzazione, Sezione IV, Il Medioevo, Vol. 8 (ed. Carocci, S.), 27–61 (Salani, 2006).

  33. 33.

    Gelichi, S. L’archeologia nella laguna veneziana e la nascita di una nuova città. Reti Medievali Rivista 11, 137–167 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gatto, P. & Previatello, P. Significato stratigrafico, comportamento meccanico e distribuzione nella laguna di Venezia di una argilla sovraconsolidata nota come" caranto" (CNR, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Donnici, S., Serandrei-Barbero, R., Bini, C., Bonardi, M. & Lezziero, A. The caranto paleosol and its role in the early urbanization of Venice. Geoarchaeology 26, 514–543 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tosi, L. L’evoluzione paleoambientale tardo-quaternaria del litorale veneziano nelle attuali conoscenze. Il Quat. Ital. J. Quat. Sci. 7, 589–596 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rizzetto, F., Tosi, L., Zecchin, M. & Brancolini, G. Modern geological mapping and subsurface lithostratigraphic setting of the Venice Lagoon (Italy). Rendiconti Lincei 21, 239–252 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Donnici, S., Madricardo, F. & de Souza, J. A. Reconstruction of the Pleistocene-Holocene transition in the Venice Lagoon (Italy) based on high-resolution geophysical survey and cores. In 2015 IEEE/OES Acoustics in Underwater Geosciences Symposium (RIO Acoustics), 1–5 (IEEE, 2015).

  39. 39.

    Brambati, A., Carbognin, L., Quaia, T., Teatini, P. & Tosi, L. The Lagoon of Venice: Geological setting, evolution and land subsidence. Episodes 26, 264–268 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bondesan, A. & Meneghel, M. (eds) Geomorfologia della provincia di Venezia: note illustrative della carta geomorfologica della provincia di Venezia Vol. 5 (Esedra, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tosi, L. et al. Note illustrative della Carta Geologica d’Italia alla scala 1: 50.000, Foglio 128 Venezia, APAT, Dip (2007).

  42. 42.

    Tosi, L. et al. Note illustrative della Carta Geologica d’Italia alla scala 1: 50.000, Foglio 148–149 Chioggia-Malamocco (2007).

  43. 43.

    Carbognin, L., Teatini, P. & Tosi, L. Eustacy and land subsidence in the Venice Lagoon at the beginning of the new millennium. J. Mar. Syst. 51, 345–353 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lambeck, K., Antonioli, F., Purcell, A. & Silenzi, S. Sea-level change along the Italian coast for the past 10,000 yr. Quat. Sci. Rev. 23, 1567–1598 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Antonioli, F. et al. Holocene relative sea-level changes and vertical movements along the Italian and Istrian coastlines. Quat. Int. 206, 102–133 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gatto, P. & Carbognin, L. The Lagoon of Venice: Natural environmental trend and man-induced modification/La Lagune de Venise: l’évolution naturelle et les modifications humaines. Hydrol. Sci. J. 26, 379–391 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Vacchi, M. et al. Multiproxy assessment of Holocene relative sea-level changes in the western mediterranean: Sea-level variability and improvements in the definition of the isostatic signal. Earth-Sci. Rev. 155, 172–197 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Trincardi, F., Correggiari, A. & Roveri, M. Late Quaternary transgressive erosion and deposition in a modern epicontinental shelf: The Adriatic semienclosed basin. Geo-marine Lett. 14, 41–51 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Trincardi, F., Cattaneo, A., Asioli, A., Correggiari, A. & Langone, L. Stratigraphy of the late-Quaternary deposits in the central Adriatic basin and the record of short-term climatic events. Memorie-Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia 55, 39–70 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Correggiari, A., Field, M. & Trincardi, F. Late Quaternary transgressive large dunes on the sediment-starved Adriatic shelf. Geol. Soc. Lond. Special Publ. 117, 155–169 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Storms, J. E., Weltje, G. J., Terra, G. J., Cattaneo, A. & Trincardi, F. Coastal dynamics under conditions of rapid sea-level rise: Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene evolution of barrier-lagoon systems on the northern Adriatic shelf (Italy). Quat. Sci. Rev. 27, 1107–1123 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kent, D. V., Rio, D., Massari, F., Kukla, G. & Lanci, L. Emergence of Venice during the Pleistocene. Quat. Sci. Rev. 21, 1719–1727 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Massari, F. et al. The environment of Venice area in the past two million years. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 202, 273–308 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    McClennen, C. E., Ammerman, A. J. & Schock, S. G. Framework stratigraphy for the Lagoon of Venice, Italy: revealed in new seismic-reflection profiles and cores. J. Coast. Res., 745–759, (1997).

  55. 55.

    McClennen, C. E. & Housley, R. A. Late-Holocene channel meander migration and mudflat accumulation rates, Lagoon of Venice, Italy. J. Coast. Res. 22, 930–945 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Madricardo, F. et al. Palaeoenvironment reconstruction in the Lagoon of Venice through wide-area acoustic surveys and core sampling. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 75, 205–213 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zezza, F. The sedimentary structure of Upper Pleistocene-Holocene deposits in Venice and its effects on the stability of the historic centre. Rendiconti Lincei 21, 211–227 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Madricardo, F., Tęgowski, J. & Donnici, S. Automated detection of sedimentary features using wavelet analysis and neural networks on single beam echosounder data: A case study from the Venice Lagoon, Italy. Cont. Shelf Res. 43, 43–54 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Donnici, S., Madricardo, F. & Serandrei-Barbero, R. Sedimentation rate and lateral migration of tidal channels in the Lagoon of Venice (Northern Italy). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 198, 354–366 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Zecchin, M. et al. Sequence stratigraphy based on high-resolution seismic profiles in the late Pleistocene and Holocene deposits of the Venice area. Mar. Geol. 253, 185–198 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Rizzetto, F. et al. Ancient geomorphological features in shallows of the Venice Lagoon (Italy). J. Coast. Res. 56, 752–756 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Tosi, L., Rizzetto, F., Zecchin, M., Brancolini, G. & Baradello, L. Morphostratigraphic framework of the Venice Lagoon (Italy) by very shallow water VHRS surveys: Evidence of radical changes triggered by human-induced river diversions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36(9), (2009).

  63. 63.

    Zecchin, M. et al. Anatomy of the Holocene succession of the southern Venice lagoon revealed by very high-resolution seismic data. Cont. Shelf Res. 29 (10), 1343–1359 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zecchin, M., Tosi, L., Caffau, M., Baradello, L. & Donnici, S. Sequence stratigraphic significance of tidal channel systems in a shallow lagoon (Venice, Italy). Holocene 24, 646–658 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Carbognin, L. Evoluzione naturale e antropica della Laguna di Venezia. Memorie Descrittive della Carta Geologica d Italia 42, 123–134 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Interventi alle bocche lagunari per la regolazione dei flussi di marea e studio di impatto ambientale del progetto di massima. Report 6 (5), Venezia. Tech. Rep., Magistrato alle Acque (1997).

  67. 67.

    Bondesan, A. & Furlanetto, P. Artificial fluvial diversions in the mainland of the Lagoon of Venice during the 16th and 17th centuries inferred by historical cartography analysis. Géomorphologie relief, processus, environnement 18, 175–200 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Bonardi, M., Canal, E. & Cavazzoni, S. Sedimentological, archeological and historical evidences of paleoclimatic changes during the Holocene in the lagoon of Venice (Italy). Tech. Rep., Global Warming International Center, Woodridge, IL (United States), (1997).

  69. 69.

    Balletti, C. Digital elaborations for cartographic reconstruction: The territorial transformations of Venice harbours in historical maps. e-Perimetron 1, 274–286 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Busato, D. Metamorfosi di un litorale. Origine e sviluppo dell’isola di Sant’Erasmo nella laguna di Venezia (Marsilio, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Fontolan, G., Pillon, S., Quadri, F. D. & Bezzi, A. Sediment storage at tidal inlets in northern Adriatic lagoons: Ebb-tidal delta morphodynamics, conservation and sand use strategies. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 75, 261–277 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Carbognin, L. & Tosi, L. Interaction between climate changes, eustacy and land subsidence in the North Adriatic Region, Italy. Mar. Ecol. 23, 38–50 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Tosi, L., Teatini, P. & Strozzi, T. Natural versus anthropogenic subsidence of Venice. Sci. Rep. 3, 2710 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Tosi, L., Lio, C. D., Teatini, P. & Strozzi, T. Land subsidence in coastal environments: Knowledge advance in the Venice coastland by TerraSAR-X PSI. Remote Sens. 10, 1191 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Dorigo, W. Venezia origini: fondamenti, ipotesi, metodi Vol. 2 (Mondadori Electa, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Dorigo, W. Venezie sepolte nella terra del Piave: Duemila anni fra il dolce e il salso (Viella, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Braccesi, L. La leggenda di Antenore: dalla Troade al Veneto (Marsilio, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Tirelli, M. Il porto di Altinum. Antichità Altoadriatiche 46, 295–316 (2001).

  79. 79.

    Mozzi, P., Fontana, A., Ferrarese, F. & Ninfo, A. Geomorfologia e trasformazione del territorio 13–18 (Altino antica. Dai veneti a Venezia, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Cresci, G. Tra terraferma e laguna. La voce degli antichi , Lezioni Marciane 2013. Venezia prima di Venezia. Alle origini di un'identità, Roma, L'Erma di Bretschneider, 1, 111–125 (2015).

  81. 81.

    Bressan, M., Calaon, D. & Cottica, D. Vivere d’acqua. Archeologie tra Lio Piccolo e Altino, Catalogo della Mostra (Grafiche Antiga, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Calaon, D. & Cipolato, A. La laguna di Venezia in età romana e tardoantica. In Vivere d’acqua. Archeologie tra Lio Piccolo e Altino, Catalogo della Mostra (eds Bressan, M. et al.) 27–39 (Grafiche Antiga, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Fozzati, L. & Toniolo, A. Argini-strade nella laguna di Venezia. In Bonifiche e drenaggi con anfore in epoca romana: aspetti tecnici e topografici, Pesavento Mattioli S. (Ed.) Modena,197–208 (1998).

  84. 84.

    Leciejewicz, L., Tabaczynska, E. & Tabaczynski, S. Torcello. Scavi 1961-1962. Istituto Nazionale d’Archeologia e Storia dell’Arte. Monografie (1977).

  85. 85.

    Leciejewicz, L. (Ed.) Torcello: nuove ricerche archeologiche. Rivista di Archeologia 23, Bretschneider Giorgio (2000).

  86. 86.

    Bortoletto, M. Gli scavi archeologici a Torcello dal 1995 al 2012. Fozzati, , L.(a cura di), Torcello scavata. Patrimonio condiviso 1, 1995–2012 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Toniolo, A. I materiali. Fozzati, L.(a cura di), Torcello scavata. Patrimonio condiviso 1, 1995–2012 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Calaon, D., Zendri, E. & Biscontin, G. Torcello scavata. Patrimonio condiviso 2. Lo scavo 2012-2013. Regione del Veneto, 2, 390 (2014).

  89. 89.

    Gelichi, S. et al. Isole fortunate?: La storia della laguna nord di Venezia attraverso lo scavo di San Lorenzo di Ammiana. Archeologia Medievale, XXXIX, 9–56 (2012).

  90. 90.

    Gelichi, S., Moine, C. & Ferri, M. Venezia e la laguna tra ix e x secolo: strutture materiali, insediamenti, economie. In I tempi del consolidamento. Venezia, l’Adriatico e l’entroterra tra IX e X secolo (eds Gasparri, S. & Gelichi, S.) 79–128 (Turnhout, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Gelichi, S. Una storia semplice? la transizione antichità-medioevo ad equilo. In In limine. Storie di una comunità ai margini della laguna (eds Gelichi, S. et al.) 93–107 (All’Insegna del Giglio, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    D’Amico, E. Approaches and perspectives on the origins of Venice. Mem. Am. Acad. Rome 62, 209–230 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Marvelli, S. & Marchesini, M. Il paesaggio vegetale e naturale ed antropico nella laguna veneziana ricostruito attraverso i reperti archeobotanici. Antichità Altoadriatiche, LXXVI (2013).

  94. 94.

    Tirelli, M. Altino antica: dai Veneti a Venezia (Marsilio, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Gatto, P. Il sottosuolo del litorale Veneziano. CNR Ist. Stud. Din. Gr. Masse, Tech. Rep., 108, (1980).

  96. 96.

    Xeidakis, G. & Varagouli, E. Design and construction of Roman roads: The case of Via Egnatia in the Aegean Thrace, northern Greece. Environ. Eng. Geosci. 3, 123–132 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Matteazzi, M. . . . ne nutent sola. . . Strade e tecniche costruttive in Cisalpina. Agri Centuriati. Int. J. Landsc. Archaeol. 9, 21–41 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Quilici, L. Evoluzione della tecnica stradale nell’Italia centrale. Evoluzione della tecnica stradale nell’Italia centrale. In Atlante tematico di topografia antica: 1. L'Erma di Bretschneider, 19–32, (1992).

  99. 99.

    Morhange, C. & Marriner, N. Archeological and biological relative sea-level indicators. In Handbook of sea-level research (Eds. I. Shennan, A.J. Long and B.P. Horton), 146–156 (2015).

  100. 100.

    Gaddi, D. Approdi nella laguna di Grado. Antichità Altoadriatiche, XLVI (2001).

  101. 101.

    Le De Grassi, V. Rovine subacquee di San Gottardo. In Aquileia Nostra XXIII, 27–36 (1950).

  102. 102.

    Fontana, A. Evoluzione geomorfologica della bassa pianura friulana: e sue relazioni con le dinamiche insediative antiche. Monografie del Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale, 47,  Udine (2006).

  103. 103.

    Auriemma, R. et al. Alle porte del mare. La laguna di Marano in Età romana, Antichità Altoadriatiche, LXXVI. Le modificazioni del paesaggio nell'Altoadriatico tra pre-protostoria e altomedioevo. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste, 93-121 (2013).

  104. 104.

    Capulli, M. ANAXUM Project. Archeologia e Storia di un Paesaggio Fluviale. In Storie di uomini e di acque. La nuova frontiera della archeologia fluviale (Atti del Convegno; Aquileia, 24-25 febbraio 2012), 26–31 (2015).

  105. 105.

    Castro, F. & Capulli, M. A preliminary report of recording the Stella 1 Roman River Barge, Italy. Int. J. Naut. Archaeol. 45, 29–41 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Bosio, L. Le strade romane della Venetia e dell’Histria Vol. 4 (Esedra, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Braccesi, L. Grecità adriatica Vol. 13 (L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Maselli Scotti, F. Riflessioni sul paesaggio aquileiese all’arrivo dei romani. In Hoc quoque laboris praemium (ed. Chiabá, M.) (Polymnia, Studi di storia romana (EUT Edizioni Universitá di Trieste, Scritti in onore di Gino Bandelli, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Maselli Scotti, F. Canale Anfora nel contesto idrografico e topografico aquileiese. In Materiali per Aquileia. Lo scavo di Canale Anfora (2004-2005) (eds Maggi, P. et al.) (Editreg, 2017).

  110. 110.

    Gaddi, D. Lo scavo e la ricostruzione delle fasi di vita del Canale. In Materiali per Aquileia. Lo scavo di Canale Anfora (2004-2005) (eds Maggi, P. et al.) 21–40 (Editreg, 2017).

  111. 111.

    Beltrame, C. Imbarcazioni lungo il litorale altoadriatico occidentale, in età romana. Sistema idroviario, tecniche costruttive e tipi navali. Antichità Altoadriatiche (2001).

  112. 112.

    Medas, S. La navigazione lungo le idrovie padane in epoca romana. In On the road. Via Emilia 187 a.C.-2017, Catalogo della Mostra (25 novembre 2017-1 luglio 2018) (eds Cantoni, G. & Capurso, A.) 146–161 (Grafiche Step, 2017).

  113. 113.

    Girotto, V. & Rosada, G. Si chiama il porto Medòakos come il fiume (Strabo v 1, 7. c.213). Mino Meduaco tra terra e laguna al tempo di Augusto. In: Veronese. In Atti della giornata di studi (Padova, 18 novembre 2014), Venetia/Venezia. Quaderni di storia e archeologia lagunare (ed. Veronese, F.) 159–179 (L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2015).

  114. 114.

    Braccesi, L. Augusto: la vita raccontata da lui stesso (Edises, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Gambacurta, G. L’insediamento antico di san basilio di ariano nel polesine. In Dalla catalogazione alla promozione dei beni archeologici. I progetti europei come occasione di valorizzazione del patrimonio culturale veneto (eds Bodon, G. et al.) 305–308 (Regione Veneto, 2014).

  116. 116.

    Braccesi, L. Dalla’fossa Augusta’alla’via Claudia Augusta’. Rivista di filologia e i istruzione classica 143, 76–81 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    CARIS HIPS and SIPS Training Manual. Tech. Rep., Teledyne CARIS, 2009).

  118. 118.

    Umgiesser, G., Canu, D. M., Cucco, A. & Solidoro, C. A finite element model for the Venice Lagoon. Development, set up, calibration and validation. J. Mar. Syst. 51, 123–145 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Umgiesser, G. et al. Comparative hydrodynamics of 10 Mediterranean lagoons by means of numerical modeling. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119, 2212–2226 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Madricardo, F. et al. High resolution multibeam and hydrodynamic datasets of tidal channels and inlets of the Venice Lagoon. Sci. Data 4, 170121 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2. Tech. Rep. (Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2015).

  122. 122.

    Remondino, F. & Stylianidis, E. 3D Recording, Documentation and Management of Cultural Heritage Vol. 2 (Whittles Publishing, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Portman, M. E., Natapov, A. & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 54, 376–384 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the Nucleo Sommozzatori della Polizia di Stato of Venice for their support for the scientific activities related to this paper, specifically the diving inspection done in the Treporti Channel and for the video and photographic material they provided; to Carlotta Toso who contributed to the preliminary mapping of the targets on the study area seafloor, and to Monica Centanni and William Mc Kiver for offering suggestions to improve the readability of the paper. The authors would like to thank the ‘Soprintendenza Archeologia, belle arti e paesaggio per il Comune di Venezia e Laguna’, for providing the authorization LAG. n. 6675 to publish some of the results of the Archive Fondo Nausicaa n. 1902, Venezia-Canale S. Felice, 1986. The authors thank DocLab Srl and National Geographic for producing the video about the discovery of the TC road. FM is grateful to Paolo Zanetti and Eros Turchetto (IDRA snc), who first investigated the area in the 1980s, for highlighting the archaeological relevance of the anthropogenic targets in the Treporti Channel multibeam data. FM and FF thank Fabio Trincardi for his constant support to the high resolution mapping activities in the Venice Lagoon. Finally, the authors are very thankful to the two anonymous Reviewers who provided important data and suggestions for the discussion of the RSL in the Venice Lagoon, helping to improve the manuscript. This work was partially supported by the National Flagship Project RITMARE, funded by MIUR, the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and the part of the scientific activity was carried out within the Research Programme Venezia2021, with the contribution of the Provveditorato for the Public Works of Veneto, Trentino Alto Adige and Friuli Venezia Giulia, provided through the concessionary of State Consorzio Venezia Nuova and coordinated by CORILA. Maps throughout this paper were created using ArcGIS software by Esri. ArcGIS and ArcMap are the intellectual property of Esri and are used herein under license. Copyright Esri. All rights reserved. For more information about Esri software, please visit http://www.esri.com.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.M. wrote most of the paper and organized, coordinated and personally contributed to the DEM analysis of the MBES data and the preparation of the figures. M.B. contributed substantially to the writing of the paper, providing the archaeological background and comparative analysis, supervised and personally contributed to the elaboration of the figures. G.D. and A.C. contributed to the writing of the paper prepared the Figures 7 and A1 in the Supplementary Material. F.F. contributed to the writing of the paper and prepared all the other figures, together with F.M and M.B. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fantina Madricardo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madricardo, F., Bassani, M., D’Acunto, G. et al. New evidence of a Roman road in the Venice Lagoon (Italy) based on high resolution seafloor reconstruction. Sci Rep 11, 13985 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92939-w

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links