Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The nature of Pu-bearing particles from the Maralinga nuclear testing site, Australia

Abstract

The high-energy release of plutonium (Pu) and uranium (U) during the Maralinga nuclear trials (1955–1963) in Australia, designed to simulate high temperature, non-critical nuclear accidents, resulted in wide dispersion µm-sized, radioactive, Pu–U-bearing ‘hot’ particles that persist in soils. By combining non-destructive, multi-technique synchrotron-based micro-characterization with the first nano-scale imagining of the composition and textures of six Maralinga particles, we find that all particles display intricate physical and chemical make-ups consistent with formation via condensation and cooling of polymetallic melts (immiscible Fe–Al–Pu–U; and Pb ± Pu–U) within the detonation plumes. Plutonium and U are present predominantly in micro- to nano-particulate forms, and most hot particles contain low valence Pu–U–C compounds; these chemically reactive phases are protected by their inclusion in metallic alloys. Plutonium reworking was observed within an oxidised rim in a Pb-rich particle; however overall Pu remained immobile in the studied particles, while small-scale oxidation and mobility of U is widespread. It is notoriously difficult to predict the long-term environmental behaviour of hot particles. Nano-scale characterization of the hot particles suggests that long-term, slow release of Pu from the hot particles may take place via a range of chemical and physical processes, likely contributing to on-going Pu uptake by wildlife at Maralinga.

Introduction

Plutonium (Pu)-bearing particles (0.45–2000 µm1) dispersed in the environment as a result of the nuclear fuel cycle, weapons testing and nuclear accidents are generally considered to be refractory and unreactive in their native state, but may be susceptible to chemical weathering and/or physical breakdown2. Plutonium can then become mobile and bio-available in water-soluble or particulate forms3, resulting in a long-term radiological risk to ecosystems and human health1.

At Maralinga, South Australia, the British nuclear testing program (1955–1963) involved seven nuclear weapons tests as well as numerous minor subcritical tests designed to investigate the performance of weapons components and safety issues4 (Table S1). The main contamination is due to the Vixen B trials that dispersed 22.2 kg of Pu and over 40 kg U across the 260 km2 ‘Taranaki’ test site5. Plutonium uptake by wildlife appears to have remained constant for the last ~ 30 years, leading to the suggestion of slow Pu release from hot particles as a result of on-going weathering at Maralinga6.

Maralinga hot particles were shown to be highly heterogenous based on bulk radionuclide contents and µm-scale chemical mapping of five particles by proton induced X-ray emission (PIXE) micro-spectrocopy5,7. This reflects the varied nature of the tests and associated devices7. Recently, Ikeda-Ohno et al.2 studied a single particle from the Vixen B trials using Synchrotron micro-X-ray fluorescence (µSXRF) and micro-X-ray absorption spectroscopy (µXAS); they confirmed that the Pu–U distribution was inhomogeneous, showed that Pu is present in the form of Pu(IV) (oxy)hydroxide compound(s), and speculated that the particle forms a "core–shell" structure with a Pu(IV) oxyhydroxide core surrounded by an external layer containing Ca, Fe, and U, which they linked to significant weathering of the particle following 50 years exposure.

This study aims to complement Ohno et al.’s2 study by (i) increasing the number of studied particles from one to six; (ii) avoiding the use of aqueous solvents in sample preparation to preserve delicate surface features and/or water-soluble forms of U/Pu; and (iii) extending the scope of characterization beyond chemical probes at µm-scale spatial resolution (µSRXF, µXAS) to µm-scale mineralogical (µXRD) and textural (µ-tomography), and to nano-scale textural and chemical characterization via dissection of selected particles with focused-ion beam-SEM (nominal resolution < 4 nm). This multi-scale characterization revealed considerable internal heterogeneity in the chemical and physical properties of all the investigated particles, resulting in a paradigm shift in our understanding of the nature of the Maralinga hot particles. We use the new information to (i) decipher the mechanisms that led to the formation of hot particles with highly complex and varied internal make-up at Maralinga; (ii) revisit the evidence for on-going weathering processes affecting Pu and U in the hot particles; a direct comparison of differential weathering of Pu and U is made possible by the fact that both actinides coexist in these particles; and (iii) explore the pathways for long-term (decades to 100’s of years) Pu release from the hot particles. The Maralinga particles are models for hot particles released during subcritical nuclear incidents, and are also useful in nuclear forensics as proxies for those generated from dirty bombs8. Overall, these new results corroborate that particle inhomogeneity and morphology1,2,9 are as or even more important as the speciation as determinants of the fate of U and Pu in the environment, and demonstrate that the accuracy of predictive models depends on the inclusion of these parameters obtained from experimental measurements.

Non-destructive bulk characterization of hot particles

The six particles (Fig. 1) were extracted from proximal and distal soils collected at Taranaki ground zero (Fig. S1) in 1984 during remediation efforts, and archived since then at the Australian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Agency in sealed containers under ambient conditions (details in Supplementary Information (SI-Materials and methods). The particles named Potatohead and Bruce were extracted by Burns et al.5,7, whereas CeresI, CeresII, CeresIII and Chip were extracted during this study from archived soil samples. A dry extraction procedure ensured minimal perturbation of the surface of the particles during their recovery from the soils (details in SI-Materials and methods). The particles are classified into three different chemical groups based on µSXRF data (Table 1; Fig. 1; elemental maps in Fig. S2; bulk spectra in Fig. S3): (i) relatively homogeneous co-location of Pu + U (Potatohead from the NW plume; Fig. 1b,c), (ii) highly heterogenous distribution of Pu + U (Bruce from the NE plume; Fig. 1f,g) and (iii) Pb-rich particles with discrete Pu ± U inclusions (CeresI–III + Chip from the northern plume; Fig. 1h–k).

Figure 1
figure1

X-ray µ-tomography (a,d,e) and µSXRF imaging (bc, fi) of hot particles from Maralinga. In (a) (Potatohead) the low-X-ray cross-section areas within the particles (black) correspond to pores, whereas in (d) and (e) (Bruce) they correspond to Al-oxide rich domains. Potatohead displays a U-rich grain (purple circle in a,b,c) attached on the outside of the particle; in (e), a U-rich, Pu-poor inclusion is highlighted in yellow.

Table 1 Summary of hot particle characterization results using µ-SXRF, µ-XAS, and µ-XRD techniques.

Potatohead and Bruce were further characterised by µSXRF-fluorescence tomography (Fig. 1a,d,e), µ-X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (µXANES) (Fig. 2), µ-Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (µEXAFS) (Fig. S4) and µ-X-Ray Diffraction (µXRD) (Fig. S5, S6) to provide information on Pu–U oxidation states and identify mineral phases present in the particles (details in SI-Hot particle composition).

Figure 2
figure2

Pu and U µXANES of the Potatohead, Bruce and CeresI hot particles. (a) Pu µXANES of particles, compared to Pu XANES standards (*) from Conradson et al.10,50; locations of the spectra are shown in the Pu L3 µSXRF maps, together with analysis numbers; (b) derivatives of the data shown in (a); (cfirst principle FMDNES simulations of Pu spectra. PuO2 was calculated to check that the simulations can reproduce known spectra and then these simulations were used to calculate Pu-carbide spectra, demonstrating that these have a white line at lower energy than PuO2. Crystal structure data: PuC51; Pu2C352; PuO253; Pu2O354; δ-Pu55; α-Pu56. (d) U µXANES of particles compared to uraninite (predominantly U4+) and uranyl nitrate (U6+). Inset shows the first derivative of the µXANES spectrum. The spectra of metallic U and UC as taken from13.

Potatohead: single Pu form

This particle was found to closely resemble the particle studied by Ikeda-Ohno2: XANES spectra show that Pu is present mainly as Pu(IV) (Fig. 2) and the bond lengths derived from EXAFS shell-by-shell fits (Table S2; Fig. S4a) are typical of those for PuO2±x. Similarly, µXANES and µEXAFS results indicate that U is present mainly as U(IV), consistent with the (U,Pu)O2±x phases. The µXRD data, however, indicate that Potatohead is made of two isomorphic crystalline phases with distinct compositions, (Pu,U)O2±x and (U,Pu)O2±x (Fig. S5; Table S3). The U XAS results also show that a U-rich, idiomorphic grain on the outside of the particle, circled in purple in Fig. 1a–c, contains a high proportion of U(VI) in the form of uranyl (short U=O bond distances (1.76–1.78 Å) from EXAFS data, Table S4, analyses #483–484 and #486; XANES spectra showing a significant edge shift to higher energy relative to the bulk grain, and a uranyl-characteristic band at ~ 17.18–17.19 keV, Fig. 2d).

Bruce: various forms of Pu

µXRD data reveal a complex and heterogeneous phase make-up, including (Pu,U)O2±x + (U,Pu)O2±x, bromellite (BeO), and Al–Fe and Al–Mg alloys (Fig. S6). Together, the Pu-XANES and electron microscopy results provide strong evidence for the presence of low valence Pu compounds in Bruce. The Pu µXANES spectra (Fig. 2a,b) are shifted to a lower energy compared to Pu(IV), indicating contribution of a lower valence state, but the white line is less intense and broader than that expected for Pu(III) compounds10,11. These spectra can be fitted as a linear combination of Pu(0) + Pu(IV). FIB-SEM results (Figs. 3, 4) indicate that Pu occurs in at least three different forms within Bruce, with the first two likely associated with low valence Pu rather than Pu(III): (i) carbide phases, (ii) a minor constituent in Fe-Al alloys, and (iii) Pu–U oxides. The presence of Pu carbides has not been reported in environmental particles to date. Dyker and Bertrand12 note that carbon exists in metal-like state in some carbides, an observation that is confirmed by the XANES spectrum of uranium carbide (UC) resembling a combination of metallic U and UO2 spectra13; indeed, the U XANES spectrum obtained from Bruce indicates a lower formal oxidation state of U compared to UO2, and is consistent with a significant proportion of U present in carbide and/or in metallic-like (alloy) form (Fig. 2d). In the absence of published XANES data on Pu-carbides, we calculated the XANES spectra of known compounds using the ab-initio code FDMNES14,15; these simulations confirm that the white lines of Pu-C compounds are at lower energy than in PuO2±x (Fig. 2c).

Figure 3
figure3

Imaging (BSE mode) of fresh FIB cut surfaces within the hot particles Potatohead, Bruce and CeresIII. Domains and phases are labelled based on EDS spot analyses and maps. (a) Popcorn-like texture of (Pu,U)O2±x phase(s) and pores due to gas entrapment. (b) Nano-sized (Pu,U)O2±x particles in an Al-oxide-rich matrix on the edge of the particle. (c) Detail showing absence of weathering product within a pore. (d) Textures suggestive of coexistence of Al-oxide-rich and Pu–U-Fe(Al)-rich melts. (e) Detail of Pu–U-Fe(Al)-rich aggregate. (f) Small aggregate of (Pu,U)O2±x nano-crystals. (g) Rim of the particle, showing oxidation of the metallic lead. (h) Detail of the weathering rim. Arrows in (g,h) indicate Pu-rich micro- to nano-particles. (i) Fracturing around Pu-carbide inclusions (white) resulting from radiation damage.

Figure 4
figure4

Details of the composition of Bruce. (a,b) FIB-SEM EDX line scans across the Pu–U-Fe(Al)-rich spheroid shown in (c); both profiles were measured at the same location, but at 20 and 5 kV respectively. These line scans demonstrate that the outer phase (labelled Al-oxide-rich matrix) consists predominantly of Al-O, and contains low levels of Pu–U, both in the background (site labelled ‘A’) and in particulate form (‘E’). The large, light grey, lath-shaped phase A grains (sites ‘B’, ‘C’, ‘D’) are Pu–U–C with minor Fe–Al. The matrix within the spherical area contains variable amounts of Fe–Al: the lighter areas contain more Fe than Al, i.e. between B and C, compared to the darker area that contains more Al than Fe, i.e. between C and D. This Fe(Al) alloy matrix also contains low levels of Pu–U. (d) Detail of (c); location in (c) is marked by a white rectangle. The Fe(Al) matrix of the this Pu–U–Fe(Al)-rich spheroid has broken down into an assemblage of two Fe(Al) alloys with different Fe:Al ratios (dark- and medium grey), and Pu–U rich nanoparticles (white). (e) Another Pu–U–Fe(Al)-rich sphere that contains phase A and B inclusions; note vapor bubbles associated with phase B. Vertical curtailing is an artifact of FIB polishing. (f) A detail of phase A, showing local compositional variation and porosity.

CeresI–III + Chip

These four particles consist predominantly of metallic Pb (Figs. 3g-i, 5). Plutonium and U are present in particulate form (arrows in Figs. 3g–i, 5), with different Pu:U ratios (different colours in Fig. 1h–k; this is confirmed by the correlation plots shown in Fig. S2g). XANES data indicate that Pu exists mainly as Pu(IV), and the U XANES spectra closely match those of uraninite (i.e., UO2+x, Fig. 2d).

Figure 5
figure5

FIB-SEM EDX characterization of CeresIII. (a,b) FIB-SEM EDX line scans of selected areas within CeresIII. (c) SEM image of FIB cross-section of the particle. (d) Overview of the particle mounted on kapton micromount. (el) Represent false colour EDS element maps for each respective element. This particle is predominantly metallic Pb, with some Fe and traces of Pu–U in the center; there are also a couple of Pu–U–C particles (at sites labelled ‘a’ and ‘b’, line 2). There is a rim of Pb–O, which contains a particle comprised of Pu–U–O (arrow and site ‘c’, line 3) and an outer rim containing Ca–C–O (most likely calcite, CaCO3) and Si (most likely a silica polymorph). Imaging and EDS analyses performed at 20 keV acceleration voltage.

µSXRF-fluorescence tomography data further highlight the differences between Potatohead and Bruce (Fig. 1a,d,e; full movies in SI). The concentrations of U and Pu are generally positively correlated in Potatohead (Fig. S2g), with the exception of the U-rich grain on the outside (Fig. 1a–c), but they are decoupled in Bruce: the framework is Pu-rich, but Bruce also contains particles of a U-rich phase varying in size from ≤ 2 to 10 µm (Fig. 1d,f,g; Fig. S2g). Both particles contain volumes characterised by low total X-ray attenuation (Fig. 1a,d,e); FIB-SEM data (see below) reveal that these volumes correspond to empty pores in Potatohead, but consist of light elements (Al-oxide-rich domains) in Bruce.

Dissection of the hot particles reveals extreme textural complexity

The characteristic X-rays of light elements are fully absorbed by less than a µm of U/Pu-rich material, which limits the information that can be gathered via non-destructive X-ray fluorescence. Hence, FIB-SEM was used to dissect Potatohead, Bruce, CeresI and CeresIII (Figs. 3, 4, 5; a gallery of images is included in SI Fig. S7). High resolution SEM imaging and X-ray spectroscopy of the freshly exposed surfaces reveal the significant complexity of the internal textures of the grains and the micro (< 5 µm) to nano-particulate (1–450 nm) nature of the Pu-rich phases; we follow the definition of nano-particle of Salbu et al.1.

Potatohead

The (Pu/U)O2±x phases in Potatohead exist as particles that are up to ~ 1 µm in diameter, and are embedded in an Al-rich matrix (Fig. 3a–c). The FIB-SEM imaging also shows that the porosity observed via X-ray tomography consists of abundant spherical pores with sizes down to ~ 1 µm. The morphology of the pores is indicative of gas entrapment; (Pu,U)O2±x is highly volatile compared to (U,Pu)O2±x, with boiling at 1 bar observed at temperatures as low as 2300 K and compositions as rich as 50 mol% UO216. All compositions in the UO2±x–PuO2±x binary are melted above ~ 3120 K, and melts can persist down to ~ 2700 K16. The presence of two distinct (Pu,U)O2±x phases revealed by XRD (Fig. S5b) most likely relates to crystallization of Potatohead from immiscible U- and Pu-rich melts, as a complete solid solution exists below 2000 K16.

Bruce

FIB-SEM revealed a level of chemical and textural heterogeneity not previously recognised in Maralinga hot particles (Figs. 3d–f, 4). The textures indicate the coexistence of at least two immiscible polymetallic melts during the formation of the particle in the explosion environment: spherical inclusions of Pu–U–Fe(Al)-rich composition float in an Al-oxide-rich matrix (Fig. 3d, SEM–EDX maps in Fig. S8). The Al-oxide-rich domains correspond to the low-density areas in the X-ray tomograph (Fig. 1d,e), and also contain numerous, sub-µm-sized inclusions of a Pu–U-rich phase (light spots in the Al-oxide rich domains in Fig. 3d,e). Aggregates (5–10 µm in diameter) of nano-particulate (Pu/U)O2±x similar in texture and composition to Potatohead also occur within the Al-oxide-rich matrix (Fig. 3f). Texturally, the Pu–U–Fe(Al)-rich domains consist of Pu–U-rich, lath-shaped crystals up to ~ 10 µm in length (Phase A: medium grey in BSE on Figs. 3d,e and 4cf), often decorated with ~ 1 µm-sized, cube-shaped crystals (Phase B; Figs. 3d, 4e) and embedded in an Fe(Al)-rich matrix (shades of dark grey in BSE, Figs. 3d,e, 4e,f). Based on the combination of XANES spectroscopy, SEM-FIB EDS line profiles (Fig. 4a–c; additional example shown in Fig. S9) and SEM-FIB EDS point spectra (Figs. S10), we interpret Phase A and B to be carbides, with Phase A also possessing Al as an essential constituent (Fig. 4a,b). Phase A commonly contains cracks and pores (Figs. 3e, 4f). Small (≤ 600 nm) spherical pores, most likely gas bubbles, are also associated with some Phase B crystals (Fig. 4e). The matrix of these Fe(Al)-rich domains may be inhomogeneous with varying Fe:Al ratios in an eutectic textural relationship typical for cooling of small liquid droplets17 (Figs. 3e, 4c,e). These Fe-Al alloys also show evidence for sub-solidus decomposition, resulting in fine grained textures with two different Fe-Al alloys and numerous Pu–U nanoparticles (< 100 nm in diameter) (arrow in Fig. 3e; detail in Fig. 4d).

The FIB-SEM cuts (Fig. 5d) confirm that CeresIII (Fig. 5) and CeresI (Fig. S11) consist of metallic Pb, with minor Fe and Cu contents. Texturally, CeresI consists of lamellae ≤ 5 µm in width and > 30 µm in length, with the matrix containing more Fe and Cu than the lamellae (Fig. S11). This internal texture is consistent with formation via cooling of melts. In this case, the melts are dominated by Pb, which was a major constituent of the featherbeds used at Taranaki18. CeresI shows no evidence of weathering, but CeresIII displays a thin (5–10 µm thick) rim of Pb–O replacing metallic Pb (Figs. 3g,h, 5c,k), indicating localised oxidation (weathering). Inclusions (< 2 µm) of Pu–U-carbide are scattered throughout CeresIII (Figs. 3i, 5a); within the Pb–O weathering rim, the Pu-rich particles are finer (< 1 µm) and consist of Pu–U-oxides (Figs. 3g,h, 5b). Two types of porosity are present: the Pb–O weathering rim contains numerous cracks that extend into the metallic lead core (red arrows in Figs. 3g,h, 5c); and cracks surrounding Pu–U-carbide inclusions within unaltered metallic Pb are suggestive of radiation damage (Fig. 3i).

Discussion

Evolving mobility pathways

Liberation of Pu from hot particles was proposed to play a significant role in explaining the continuous exposure of animals at Maralinga6. Previous micro-characterization of Maralinga hot particles was limited to non-destructive µm-scale studies via PIXE and µXRF/µXAS2,5,7. Potatohead is similar in texture (fragile, highly porous) and composition (Pu present mainly in (Pu,U)O2±x like form) to the particle studied by Ikeda-Ohno2; however, our multi-scale and multi-method characterization of diverse hot particles invites a revisit of the implications of earlier results for the fate of Pu at Maralinga: our results reveal a great variability in the nature and internal make-up of hot particles; they provide direct evidence for decoupling of U and Pu geochemistry during weathering at Maralinga; and identify that some particles contain a significant amount of Pu in low-valence state, which is unexpected for particles that survived for ~ 30 years in the environment. Here, we start by discussing the significance of these results with respect to the chemical and physical factors, summarised in Fig. 6, that contribute to Pu liberation from the hot particles. Such observations provide a mechanistic foundation for predicting the future evolution of the particles and likely exposure pathways6. Finally, we emphasize how the nature of the particles is a direct result of the source material and their mode of formation1, which is revealed to be via cooling of polymetallic melts by textural and compositional data, and we discuss the broader implications of these results for high temperature sub-critical nuclear incidents.

Figure 6
figure6

Inferred exposure pathways at Maralinga: the nature of hot particles influences Pu cycling in the environment. The colours in the figure reflect: processes in explosion cloud (white), breakdown processes of Pu particle (blue), exposure pathways via mobile phases (yellow). The background image is from the UK Atomic Energy Authority/Atomic Weapons Research Establishment, available under the Open Government License (http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/) and National Archives of Australia A6456, R075/004..

Physical breakdown

The different particles have contrasting bulk composition and internal make-up; these differences probably reflect differences in the source term of individual tests7 and correlates with the locations of the particles (Fig. S1). Maralinga hot particles have long been recognised to be friable; for example, Ikeda-Ohno’s2 particle broke into smaller pieces during gentle handing, as did our Chip particle. The FIB-SEM data reveal that this fragility can result from a combination of factors. (i) Bruce and Potatohead are intrinsically friable as a result of their chemical and physical heterogeneity down to the nm-scale. This phase heterogeneity results in joints and fractures providing points of mechanical weakness within the particle. Potatohead also features a high amount of porosity (Figs. 1a, 3a). (ii) Further mechanical weakening and fracturing are caused by chemical weathering, which induces fracturing in the Pb-rich particles (Figs. 3g,h, 5c). (iii) Finally, radiation damage also contributes to fracturing and increasing porosity (Fig. 3i). 239Pu (weapons grade Pu used during Vixen B consisted of ~ 95% 239Pu; Table S1) generates 3 × 109 α-particles g−1 s−1; the porous halos around the Pu-rich particles extend radially around 5 µm (Fig. 3i), suggesting that each 5 meV alpha particle travels ~ 5 µm in the Pb-rich matrix causing damage along its path19. Phase A also shows internal fracturing (Fig. 3e) and porosity (Fig. 4f), that could be due to relaxation of internal stress during cooling, chemical weathering, or radiation damage.

Mechanical weathering is expected to dominate in deserts; the Maralinga nuclear test site is an arid environment (monthly mean temperatures range from 13 to 25 °C), with cool winters with overnight frosts (minimum − 3 °C), hot summers with temperatures frequently exceeding 40 °C, and large diurnal fluctuations in temperature6,18,20. In this context, the fact that Pu is mostly hosted in phases with particle size that range from ~ 5 to < 100 nm means that physical weathering will release particles that can travel in dust (particles less than 7–10 µm are identified as a respirable risk) or in groundwater. In addition to increasing mobility, the reduction in size of Pu particles increases the radiological risks significantly, as the probability of exposure increases, since α-emitters such as Pu need to be located at the surface of the particle to cause an immediate radiological risk; hence, the effective dose increases as the size of the particles decreases. The increasing surface area with decreasing particle size also enhances the susceptibility to chemical weathering.

Chemical weathering

Our results confirm the mostly refractory nature of Pu in the hot particles1. This is in contrast with U, which shows significant in-particle mobility. Some of the U in Potatohead is in the form of uranyl (U(VI)O22+) (Fig. 2d), and µSXRF maps show evidence for some U redistribution in Potatohead in the form of (i) a rim enriched in U relative to Pu (arrow in Fig. 1c) and a U(VI)-rich crystal growing on the outside of the particle (Figs. 1a–c, 2d). In general, U(IV) phases are insoluble at room temperature, and U mobility is mainly related to U(VI) uranyl complexes (e.g., aqua, carbonate, sulfate, and chloride21). Similarly, Ikeda-Ohno et al.2 suggested that U was leached out of the single particle they studied, based on µSXRF data showing Ca + U enrichment on its periphery. Based on µSXRF and µXANES (predominance of (Pu,U)O2±x) data, Potatohead is similar to Ikeda-Ohno et al.’s2 particle; however, the FIB-SEM data show that Potatohead does not show the core–shell structure inferred by Ikeda-Ohno et al.2. Since the high-resolution SEM images do not show evidence of hydrous weathering, even along grain boundaries or inside pores (Fig. 3b,c), U oxidation and mobilization likely must result from limited capillary action through this porous particle. Calcium most probably reflects precipitation of calcite (‘calcrete’)22 on the outside of the particle, rather than Ca substitution of U/Pu during (U,Pu)O2±x leaching. Similarly, EDS maps of the CeresIII particle show an enrichment in Ca–C–Si on the outside of the particle, reflecting a thin coating of calcite (Ca,C) and some silicate/clay mineral (Si) (Fig. 5e–l).

A core–shell style chemical weathering was observed in CeresIII (Figs. 3g–i, 5), replacing the Pb alloy with a Pb–O phase. This oxidation increased porosity, and Pu speciation changed from low-valence Pu in the core to Pu–O compounds in the weathered rim, concomitant with a decrease in size of the Pu-rich particles. However, despite these changes in Pu speciation, it appears that little or no Pu was released from the particle (e.g., Fig. 5l).

Further, a significant portion of Pu is present in low valence form in Bruce and CeresIII. Although uranium carbide (UC) has been found in depleted U particles from Kosovo and Kuwait23, this is the first report of Pu-carbide and Pu-bearing alloys in hot particles retrieved from the environment. Low valence Pu–U-carbide phases are typically pyrophoric at µm-grain size in contact with water or molecular oxygen24, yet these phases were retained despite ~ 30 years exposure to an arid environment and then another ~ 30 years stored at ambient conditions. These phases were probably protected by their inclusion in Fe–Al alloy (Bruce) and metallic Pb (CeresIII), as well as by the presence of impurities. In CeresIII, Pu–U-carbide exists within metallic Pb, but a Pu–U-oxide is predominant within the oxidised rim (Fig. 5c). The properties of actinide carbides are strongly dependent on minor or trace elements in their crystal structure24; this may further stabilize the carbide phases. Indeed, there was no evidence of oxidation of the Pu–U-carbide phases in Bruce following exposure to atmospheric, ambient conditions for around 10 months (Fig. S12). Hence, Pu-rich phases can persist in chemical states that are far from equilibrium with their environment (water, air), as a result of the physical and chemical make-up of the hot particles.

Ingestion and modification by stomach acids

Aside from mechanical breakdown and chemical weathering by exposure to moisture and atmosphere, hot particles may be transformed via ingestion by animals6,20. Leaching tests using 0.16 M HCl to simulate stomach acids found that just ~ 0.20% of 239+240Pu was leached in ~ 200 h from a millimeter-sized particle with a glassy structure from Ground zero, Semipalatinsk, former USSR1, in line with the expected refractory nature of Pu hot particles. However, similar tests on six particles recovered from Taranaki (containing < 20 wt% PuO2; other metals present in significant concentrations were U, Fe, Cr) found solubilities varying from 1 to 96% over 40 days5. Note that compared to the simple dissolutions tests conducted by1,5, stomach acids also contain enzymes that will affect hot particle behaviour, but the FIB-SEM results can explain the wide range in behaviour in HCl-leaching experiments: (i) although (Pu,U)O2±x would be poorly soluble in these tests, dissolution of the Al-oxide-rich domains binding the individual µm- to nm-sized (Pu,U)O2±x grains in Potatohead-type particles may release the Pu-rich grains, some of which have sizes < 0.45 µm; similarly dissolution of Al- and Fe-rich phases in Bruce-type particles would release Pu-rich nanoparticles. Dissolution of the Pb/PbO-rich particles is limited by the low solubility of PbCl2(s).

Particulate transport

As summarised in Fig. 6, the weathering processes discussed above may result in the release of Pu-rich particles ≤ 5 µm from the hot particles. As Pu exists in micro- to nano-particulate form in all studied particles, despite their different chemistries, Pu liberation does not require a chemical process; simple mechanical breakdown will release nanoparticles. All released Pu-rich particles cause an inhalation risk, and the finer fraction (nanoparticles) can be transported into the groundwater during rainfall events. Nano-particle-facilitated transport of Pu in groundwater was first identified at the Nevada test site3,25 and more recently at (i) the weapon-producing sites of the Mayak Production Association, Urals, Russia26; Rocky Flats, Colorado, USA27 and Hanford, Washington, USA28; (ii) at the nuclear power sites at Sellafield/Windscale, UK; Chernobyl, Ukraine; and Marcoule, France28; and (iii) in rivers waters related to the Grimsel test site, Switzerland28. The arid environment at Maralinga is conductive to both dust and water-borne nano-particulate transport; although rainfall is limited (~ 240 mm/year), it is often of a convective nature and characterised by high-intensity, short-duration events (≥ 3 days with > 10 mm rainfall per year29). Although direct evidence of nano-particle transport is still lacking at the ultra-dilute conditions at Maralinga, direct imaging of the nature of the Pu-rich phases in the hot particles and their behaviour during weathering suggest that this may be a primary cause for wild-life exposure6.

From fire to dust

Once liberated from the hot particles, the environmental behaviour of Pu is governed by complex processes3,30 involving solubility, hydrolysis, complexation and sorption (with both inorganic and organic ligand and phases31,32) and nano-particle (colloid) formation reactions (all possibly catalysed by microbiota33). Yet, the potential for Pu to migrate through the soil environment and enter the food chain, and the resulting risk to biota (Fig. 6), can be estimated using radioecological models. These models need to consider not only the amounts of radioactive material released to the environment following an accident, but also the physical and chemical characteristics of the contaminant and their potential changes through time in order to determine the long-term impacts arising from contamination1,3,34,35,36,37. Based on non-destructive micro-analytical characterization, hot particles from sub-critical nuclear incidents across the globe are chemically and texturally heterogeneous (Table S5). This heterogeneity is hindering their inclusion in radioecological models that are used to predict long-term risks38.

At Maralinga, the particles contain Pu (and U) in the form of high temperature, anhydrous phases, that are far from equilibrium with respect to environmental conditions. Textural and phase relationship considerations reveal that all studied particles formed via cooling of polymetallic melts resulting from fissile material mixing with the hot detonation environment. The Pb, Fe and Al present in the particles reflect the composition of the individual devices and detonation characteristics. Unfortunately, no information is available in public records on the specifics of the designs and materials of individual tests. Most Pu is hosted in nano-phases that crystallised during the cooling of these polymetallic melts, and, consequently, the micro- to nano-particulate nature of the Pu in these hot particles, regardless of their bulk composition, is an intrinsic result of their formation via cooling of micro-droplets of polymetallic melt17 (Figs. 3d, 4). The hot, anhydrous micro-environment under which the particles condense in the explosion cloud also accounts for the crystallization of phases that contain Pu (and U) in low valence state (carbides; Pu in Fe-(Al)-alloys). Sub-solidus reactions (e.g. Bruce; arrow in Figs. 3e, 4c,d) and weathering (CeresIII, Figs. 3g,h, 5) further contributed to the generation of fine Pu-rich nanoparticles (< 100 nm) subsequent to cooling.

The recognition of the nature and internal make-up of the hot particles has important consequences for the cycling of Pu in the arid environment at Maralinga. As summarised in Fig. 6, liberation of micro- to nano-particulate Pu is promoted over time via mechanical breakdown, facilitated by the heterogenous and/or highly porous nature of the particles and thermal cycling in the environment. In addition, near-surface particles have a high probability of ingestion by soil biota and higher animals. Dissolution via digestion of the reactive, metallic matrix of the particle (Fe-, Al-, or Pb-rich alloys) could result in the further release of Pu-rich nanoparticles. Compared to the parent hot particles, these micro- ( 5 µm) and nanoparticles have additional toxicity risks due to their small sizes, the low-valence state of Pu and their mobility in dust and groundwater.

The Vixen B trials at Maralinga were designed to simulate sub-critical nuclear incidents, i.e. accidents where energy is released from external fires or conventional explosives. Since these tests, the world has documented a few instances of such incidents (Table S5, SI-Previous studies), including the B-52 accidents that resulted in the conventional detonation of thermonuclear weapons near Palomares, Spain39 and Thule, Greenland39,40; and the explosion of an armed nuclear missile and subsequent fire at the McGuire Air Force Base, USA9. Hot particles from these sub-critical nuclear incidents share the chemical and textural heterogeneity of the Maralinga particles as a result of the similar mode of formation from polymetallic melts. In particular, the distinctive texture of Potatohead (Fig. 3a–c) is remarkably similar to that of the particles from Palomares39 and Thule40; and hot particles from the McGuire Air Force Base accident have µSXRF images and Pu–U correlations similar to either Bruce and Potatohead9. In summary, hot particles released via high energy sub-critical incidents acquire their compositions and textures at high temperature within the explosion cloud, and this mode of formation sets the scene for their long-term environmental behaviour1. We note that hot particles released following high energy failure of containment in nuclear reactors, such as Chernobyl17,41,42 and Fukushima43, also show heterogeneous compositions, with U ± Pu associated with Zr and other metals from the reactor cladding43,44,45. These particles share a formation via cooling of high temperature melts, however in this case melting occurs in the nuclear fuel rather than in the explosion cloud. In addition, aerodynamic silica fallout particles generated in near surface critical nuclear tests were found to contain a heterogeneous distribution of elements, related to environmental and device material being incorporated and fractionated in the fireball46,47,48.

Between 1950 and 1988 alone, there were more than 230 recorded nuclear weapon accidents, including at least 10 with documented release of radioactive particles into the environment49. The risks of such incidents are only increasing as international treaties such as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty and NewSTART come to an end. Yet, there is currently no international best practice for the inclusion of Pu–U rich hot particles released during sub-critical incidents in environmental impact assessment or risk characterization. The new observations on the hot particles from the Maralinga tests provide a clear explanation for the heterogeneous behaviour of different hot particles with respect to chemical and physical weathering5,41 that has hindered predictive modelling. Bulk characterization of the hot particles provides limited information about the nature and heterogeneity of the particles2. This issue is alleviated by the use of FIB-SEM; nano-scale chemical and textural characterization exposes the diversity of hot particles; allows identification of the different weathering pathways in historic particles; and provides the fundamental information for predicting the future behaviour of the particles and the radioecological risk to humans and non-human biota.

Data availability

All data is available in the main text or the supplementary materials.

References

  1. 1.

    Salbu, B. et al. Challenges associated with the behaviour of radioactive particles in the environment. J. Environ. Radioact. 186, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.09.001 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ikeda-Ohno, A. et al. Fate of plutonium at a former nuclear testing site in Australia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 9098–9104. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01864 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kersting, A. B. Plutonium transport in the environment. Inorg. Chem. 52, 3533–3546. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic3018908 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Symonds, J. L. A History of British Atomic Tests in Australia (Australian Government Publishing Service, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cooper, M. B., Burns, P. A., Tracy, B. L., Wilks, M. J. & Williams, G. A. Characterization of plutonium contamination at the former nuclear weapons testing range, at Maralinga in South Australia. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 177, 161–184 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Johansen, M. P. et al. Plutonium in wildlife and soils at the Maralinga legacy site: Persistence over decadal time scales. J. Environ. Radioact. 131, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.10.014 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Burns, P. A., Cooper, M. B., Williams, G. A. & Johnston, P. N. Properties of Plutonium-Contaminated Particles Resulting from British Vixen Trials at Maralinga (Australian Radiation Laboratory, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Oughton, D. H. & Kashparov, V. Radioactive Particles in the Environment (Springer, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Batuk, O. N. et al. Multiscale speciation of U and Pu at Chernobyl, Hanford, Los Alamos, McGuire AFB, Mayak, and Rocky Flats. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 6474–6484. https://doi.org/10.1021/es506145b (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Conradson, S. D. et al. Local and nanoscale structure and speciation in the PuO2+x-y(OH)2yzH2O system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13443–13458 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Conradson, S. D. et al. Local structure and charge distribution in the UO2-U4O9 system. Inorg. Chem. 43, 6922–6935. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic049748z (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dyker, A. C. & Bertrand, G. Rethinking carbon. Nat. Chem. 1, 265–266 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Vigier, N. et al. New data on the structure of uranium monocarbide. Chem. Mater. 20, 3199–3204 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Joly, Y. et al. in 14th International Conference on X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure. Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 190 (eds A. DiCicco & A. Filipponi) (2009).

  15. 15.

    Guda, S. A. et al. Optimized finite difference method for the full-potential XANES simulations: Application to molecular adsorption geometries in MOFs and metal–ligand intersystem crossing transients. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 4512–4521. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00327 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Böhler, R. et al. Recent advances in the study of the UO2–PuO2 phase diagram at high temperatures. J. Nucl. Mater. 448, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.02.029 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tooth, B., Ciobanu, C. L., Green, L., O’Neill, B. & Brugger, J. Bi-melt formation and gold scavenging from hydrothermal fluids: An experimental study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 5423–5443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.020 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    MARTAC. Rehabilitation of former nuclear test sites at Emu and Maralinga (Australia) (Department of Education Science and Training, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nordlund, K. et al. Primary radiation damage: A review of current understanding and models. J. Nucl. Mater. 512, 450–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.10.027 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Johansen, M. P. et al. Accumulation of plutonium in mammalian wildlife tissues following dispersal by accidental-release tests. J. Environ. Radioact. 151, 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.03.031 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Timofeev, A. et al. Uranium transport in acidic brines under reducing conditions. Nat. Commun. 9, 1469. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03564-7 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Reith, F. et al. Distribution and speciation of gold in biogenic and abiogenic calcium carbonates—Implications for the formation of gold anomalous calcrete. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 1942–1956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.01.014 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lind, O. C. et al. Solid state speciation and potential bioavailability of depleted uranium particles from Kosovo and Kuwait. J. Environ. Radioact. 100, 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.20 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Manara, D., De Bruycker, F., Sengupta, A. K., Agarwal, R. & Kamath, H. S. Thermodynamic and thermophysical properties of the actinide carbides. in Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, Vol. 2: Material Properties/Oxide Fuels for Light Water Reactors and Fast Neutron Reactors, 87–137 (2012).

  25. 25.

    Kersting, A. B. et al. Migration of plutonium in ground water at the Nevada Test Site. Nature 397, 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/16231 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Novikov, A. P. et al. Colloid transport of plutonium in the far-field of the Mayak Production Association, Russia. Science 314, 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131307 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Santschi, P. H., Roberts, K. A. & Guo, L. D. Organic nature of colloidal actinides transported in surface water environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 3711–3719. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0112588 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Geckeis, H., Zavarin, M., Salbu, B., Lind, O. C. & Skipperud, L. In Plutonium Handbook 2nd edn, Vol. 4 (eds Clark, D. L. et al.) 1979–2118 (American Nuclear Society, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bureau of Meteorology, http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/climate_averages/raindays/ (retrieved 28/9/2020).

  30. 30.

    Clark, D. L., Hecker, S. S., Jarvinen, G. D. & Neu, M. P. In The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements, Ch. 7 (eds Morss, L. R. et al.) 813–1264 (Springer, 2010).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Santschi, P. H. et al. Iodine and plutonium association with natural organic matter: A review of recent advances. Appl. Geochem. 85, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.11.009 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Xu, C. et al. Colloidal cutin-like substances cross-linked to siderophore decomposition products mobilizing plutonium from contaminated soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 8211–8217. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801348t (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Newsome, L., Morris, K. & Lloyd, J. R. The biogeochemistry and bioremediation of uranium and other priority radionuclides. Chem. Geol. 363, 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.034 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Haschke, J. M., Allen, T. H. & Morales, L. A. Surface and corrosion chemistry of plutonium. Los Alamos Sci. 26, 252–273 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hecker, S. S. The plutonium challenge—Environmental issues. Los Alamos Sci. 26, 36–47 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Parrish, R. & Aitkaliyeva, A. A review of microstructural features in fast reactor mixed oxide fuels. J. Nucl. Mater. 510, 644–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.05.076 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pacold, J. I. et al. Chemical speciation of U, Fe, and Pu in melt glass from nuclear weapons testing. J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948942 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    IAEA. Quantification of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments for Radiological Assessments (978-92-0-104509-6). https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1616_web.pdf (2009).

  39. 39.

    Lind, O. C. et al. Characterization of U/Pu particles originating from the nuclear weapon accidents at Palomares, Spain, 1966 and Thule, Greenland, 1968. Sci. Total Environ. 376, 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.11.050 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lind, O. C., Salbu, B., Janssens, K., Proost, K. & Dahlgaard, H. Characterization of uranium and plutonium containing particles originating from the nuclear weapons accident in Thule, Greenland, 1968. J. Environ. Radioact. 81, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.10.013 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Salbu, B. et al. Hot particles in accidental releases from chernobyl and windscale nuclear installations. Analyst 119, 125–130 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Burakov, B. E., Shabalev, S. I. & Anderson, E. B. In Role of Interfaces in Environmental Protection. NATO Science Series, IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences Vol. 24 (ed. Barany, S.) 145–151 (Kluwer, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ochiai, A. et al. Uranium dioxides and debris fragments released to the environment with cesium-rich microparticles from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 2586–2594. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06309 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Admon, U. In Radioactive Particles in the Environment (eds Oughton, D. H. & Kashparov, V.) 15–55 (Springer, 2009).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kurihara, E. et al. Particulate plutonium released from the Fukushima Daiichi meltdowns. Sci. Total Environ. 743, 140539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140539 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lewis, L. A. et al. Spatially-resolved analyses of aerodynamic fallout from a uranium-fueled nuclear test. J. Environ. Radioact. 148, 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.04.006 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Holliday, K. S. et al. Plutonium segregation in glassy aerodynamic fallout from a nuclear weapon test. Dalton Trans. 46, 1770–1778. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6dt04184a (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Weisz, D. G. et al. Deposition of vaporized species onto glassy fallout from a near-surface nuclear test. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 201, 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.10.036 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gregory, S. & Edwards, A. The hidden cost of deterrence—Nuclear-weapons accidents 1950–88. Bull. Peace Proposals 20, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/096701068902000101 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Conradson, S. D. et al. Higher order speciation effects on plutonium L3 X-ray absorption near edge spectra. Inorg. Chem. 43, 116–131 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kruger, O. L. Phase studies on arc-melted plutonium–carbon alloys near the monocarbide composition. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 46, 80–85 (1963).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Green, J. L., Arnold, G. P., Leary, J. A. & Nereson, N. G. Crystallographic and magnetic ordering studies of plutonium carbides using neutron diffraction. J. Nucl. Mater. 34, 281–289 (1970).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Zachariasen, W. H. Crystal chemical studies of the 5f-series of elements. XII. New compounds representing known structure types. Acta Crystallogr. 2, 388–390 (1949).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wulff, M. & Lander, G. H. Magnetic structure and Pu ground state in β-Pu2O3. J. Chem. Phys. 89, 3295. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.454935 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ellinger, F. H. Crystal structure of ∂’-plutonium and the thermal expansion characteristics of delta, delta-prime, and epsilon plutonium. J. Metals 8, 1256–1259 (1956).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Zachariasen, W. H. & Ellinger, F. H. The crystal structure of alpha plutonium metal. Acta Crystallogr. A 16, 777–783 (1963).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Diamond Light Source for time on Beamline I18. Travel funding was provided by the International Synchrotron Access Program (ISAP) managed by the Australian Synchrotron, part of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO), and funded by the Australian Government. A preliminary experiment was undertaken on the XFM beamline at the Australian Synchrotron; we thank Daryl Howard for his support. The Ramaciotti Centre for Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Monash University) is acknowledged for use of their facilities. We would like to thank Tina Geraki for her assistance with PyMCA. We would like to thank Doug Sprigg for a stimulating chat and photos from Maralinga.

Funding

Australian Synchrotron proposal M11976; Diamond Light Source under proposal SP20533; International Synchrotron Access Program (ISAP) proposal ISP14388.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: M.C., J.B. Formal analysis: B.E., M.C., K.I., S.C. Investigation: M.C., B.E., R.R., K.I., G.G., S.C., V.W., J.B. Visualization: J.B., K.I., G.G., R.R. Writing—original draft: M.C., B.E., J.B. Writing—review and editing: B.E., J.B., M.C., R.R., K.I., G.G., S.D.C., S.C., V.W.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Barbara Etschmann or Joёl Brugger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Video 1.

Supplementary Video 2.

Supplementary Video 3.

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cook, M., Etschmann, B., Ram, R. et al. The nature of Pu-bearing particles from the Maralinga nuclear testing site, Australia. Sci Rep 11, 10698 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89757-5

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing