Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advanced glycation end products as predictors of renal function in youth with type 1 diabetes

Abstract

To examine if skin autofluorescence (sAF) differed in early adulthood between individuals with type 1 diabetes and age-matched controls and to ascertain if sAF aligned with risk for kidney disease. Young adults with type 1 diabetes (N = 100; 20.0 ± 2.8 years; M:F 54:46; FBG-11.6 ± 4.9 mmol/mol; diabetes duration 10.7 ± 5.2 years; BMI 24.5(5.3) kg/m2) and healthy controls (N = 299; 20.3 ± 1.8 years; M:F-83:116; FBG 5.2 ± 0.8 mmol/L; BMI 22.5(3.3) kg/m2) were recruited. Skin autofluorescence (sAF) and circulating AGEs were measured. In a subset of both groups, kidney function was estimated by GFRCKD-EPI CysC and uACR, and DKD risk defined by uACR tertiles. Youth with type 1 diabetes had higher sAF and BMI, and were taller than controls. For sAF, 13.6% of variance was explained by diabetes duration, height and BMI (Pmodel = 1.5 × 10–12). In the sub-set examining kidney function, eGFR and sAF were higher in type 1 diabetes versus controls. eGFR and sAF predicted 24.5% of variance in DKD risk (Pmodel = 2.2 × 10–9), which increased with diabetes duration (51%; Pmodel < 2.2 × 10–16) and random blood glucose concentrations (56%; Pmodel < 2.2 × 10–16). HbA1C and circulating fructosamine albumin were higher in individuals with type 1 diabetes at high versus low DKD risk. eGFR was independently associated with DKD risk in all models. Higher eGFR and longer diabetes duration are associated with DKD risk in youth with type 1 diabetes. sAF, circulating AGEs, and urinary AGEs were not independent predictors of DKD risk. Changes in eGFR should be monitored early, in addition to uACR, for determining DKD risk in type 1 diabetes.

Introduction

The presence of kidney disease (DKD) is the strongest predictor of mortality in individuals with diabetes1. In type 1 diabetes, it is increasingly appreciated that future risk for DKD and cardiovascular disease (CVD) may be evident as early as adolescence2, exacerbated by difficulties in maintaining adequate glycemic control at that time3. Risk for DKD is defined as an increase in urinary albumin excretion during puberty, preceding micro- and macroalbuminuria, as seen in adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the upper third of urinary albumin excretion4. However, best practice regimens for adults, targeting hypertension and dyslipidemia were ineffective at preventing microalbuminuria over a few years, in a Phase III clinical trial in adolescents with type 1 diabetes4. This suggests that other pathological factors may be at play during the early development of DKD.

Despite there being increasing scrutiny of childhood and adolescence, there is a paucity of data available examining risk for DKD in young adults with type 1 diabetes prior to the onset of chronic complications. These young people are often lost to follow up in the transition from pediatric to adult clinical care5, and commonly re-present later in adulthood with established diabetes complications, including DKD6,7. Understanding disease pathogenesis in young adults is also pertinent for type 2 diabetes given the growing number of children, adolescents and young adults diagnosed and their commonly accelerated progression to DKD in the context of adverse cardiovascular risk profiles8. Indeed, approximately 50% of individuals with type 1 diabetes develop DKD but this may be as high as 70%9.

The use of skin collagen associated advanced glycation end products (AGEs) to predict risk for diabetes complications including DKD comes from early studies by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Trial (DCCT/EDIC) study group10. Here, greater accumulation of skin collagen AGEs, such as carboxymethyllysine (CML), predicted faster progression to DKD in young people with type 1 diabetes aged 20–30 years10. These quantitative studies of punch skin biopsies have evolved into non-invasive skin autofluorescence (sAF), a tool for assessing AGE-associated disease risk11. Previous cross-sectional12,13,14 and follow up studies15 in children, adolescents (< 18 years) and older adults (50–65 years) with diabetes have demonstrated that increases in sAF are an independent predictor of micro and macrovascular disease. AGE burden in diabetes can also be assessed using circulating or urinary AGE concentrations. Studies in adolescents and young people have mostly shown increases in circulating16,17 or urinary AGE concentrations18 with diabetes, but no independent association with diabetes complications19,20.

Hence, the first objective of this study was to examine if skin autofluorescence (sAF) differed in early adulthood (15–25 years of age) between individuals with type 1 diabetes and age-matched controls. The second objective was to ascertain if sAF aligned with risk for kidney disease, defined by the presence of type 1 diabetes and urinary albumin excretion tertile.

Methods

Study design and participants

The full cohort with diagnosed type 1 diabetes of greater than two years duration consisted of 100 adolescents/young adults (aged 15–25 years). Participants in this cohort did not have previously diagnosed diabetes complications, including kidney disease, neuropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular disease. Participants were recruited during their routine visit to the Transitional Care Clinic in Diabetes at the Mater Young Adult Health Centre. All participants that consented were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were (1) uncontrolled diabetes (defined as HbA1C > 9.5%) or two episodes of ketoacidosis in the preceding 12 months, (2) history of severe family hypercholesterolemia, (3) previous myocardial infarction, stroke or pre-existing kidney disease, (4) pregnancy, (5) any existing medication other than insulin, (6) autoimmune diseases including uncontrolled coeliac disease, Addison’s disease, any congenital condition resulting in insulin dependent diabetes, and/or (7) diagnosed eating disorders.

The full control cohort (N = 299) was recruited from an undergraduate biomedical science course at the University of Queensland in 2018 and 2019. All students who completed the practical unit and who consented were included. The absence of diabetes was confirmed by a 2 h glucose measurement during a 75 g OGTT. OGTT was performed following standard procedure, with a 75 g/300 mL glucose load followed by blood glucose measurements at 30, 60, and 120 min after the glucose load21. Blood glucose was measured using a glucometer. A finger prick blood sample (~ 100 μl) was collected from a randomly selected group of control individuals (Renal Sub-set; N = 49) and was used for the eGFR measurement.

Data and sample collection

Skin autofluorescence was assessed using an autofluorescence reader (mu AGE Reader; DiagnOptics, Groningen, the Netherlands) on a 4mm2 clean skin surface at the volar side of the forearm using a single device at both sites11. Four University students in the control group who had originally consented, were excluded due to documented use of tanning products or sunscreen which was not cleanly removed by ethanol wipes. Urinary AGEs were measured using LC–MS/MS as previously described22.

Data obtained from individuals at recruitment included chronological age, sex, height, weight and BMI. Height (cm) was measured using a mounted measuring stick and weight (kg) using standard scales. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). For individuals with type 1 diabetes, age at diagnosis, diabetes duration, mean systolic blood pressure and a morning non-fasted and second void urine sample were also obtained.

Biochemistry, renal function and risk for DKD

HbA1C and random blood glucose were assessed using point of care devices. Quantikine ELISA kits were used for the measurement of serum cystatin C (R&D systems, Minneapolis, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Estimated GFR was calculated from serum cystatin C using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration eGFR CKD-EPI-CysC equation, if serum cystatin C ≤ 0.8 mg/mL eGFR = 133 × min(Scys/0.8, 1)−0.499 × 0.996Age × 0.932 [if female], and if serum cystatin C > 0.8 mg/mL eGFR = 133 × min(Scys /0.8, 1)−1.328 × 0.996Age × 0.932 [if female]. In individuals with type 1 diabetes, the second morning urine void was collected for uACR and measured by the Mater Pathology routine laboratory. In addition to this uACR, we utilised the uACR measurements from two previous clinic visits to calculate mean urinary ACR values and define tertiles of ACR for each of the renal study participants based on previous studies2,23. Individual risk for DKD was allocated as: 0 = no diabetes (Control, 49 subjects), 1 = diabetes + lowest uACR tertile (Low Risk uACR ≤ 0.66 mg/mmol; 27 subjects), 2 = diabetes + middle uACR tertile (Medium Risk uACR = 0.67–1.16 mg/mmol; 29 subjects) or 3 = diabetes + upper uACR tertile (High Risk uACR ≥ 1.17 mg/mmol; 33 subjects). Albuminuria was defined according to international guidelines as uACR > 2.5 mg/mmol in males and > 3.5 mg/mmol in females.

Statistical analyses

Data were expressed as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range) unless otherwise stated. Normality testing (Shapiro–Wilk) was performed on all data. Parametric data were analysed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc for multiple comparisons. Non-parametric data were analysed by Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc. Univariate modelling with Holm’s correction was used to determine interdependence of variables in the two cohorts. General linear models were used to examine the associations between sAF and were sequentially adjusted for covariates identified by univariate analyses in the full sAF cohort. Risk for DKD in the renal sub-study was also studied using general linear modelling.

Ethics approval statement

This research protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics committees of Mater Misericordiae Limited (Approval: HREC_15_MHS_35T1D) and the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia (Approval: 2016-02-066-PRE-3; UQ 2015-000-958). All investigation was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Patient consent statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and if under 18 years of age, from their legal guardian in addition to the participant assent, prior to inclusion in the study.

Results

Recruited individuals (Fig. 1A) were, on average, 20 years of age (Table 1). Baseline characteristics did not differ between the full sAF cohort and the Renal sub-set (Table 1). Those with diabetes were taller, with greater BMI, random blood glucose concentrations and sAF and with median diabetes duration of 10 years (Table 1, Fig. 1B). Holm’s corrected Spearman’s correlations in the full sAF and renal sub-set showed that sAF was positively associated with age, BMI and diabetes duration and negatively correlated with height (Fig. 1C). The duration of diabetes was also related to weight and consequently BMI (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1
figure1

Overview of study design and baseline summary of the full cohort. (A) Flow chart of participant numbers. (B) Baseline characteristics of participants in the Full cohort for control individuals without diabetes (N = 299) and for individuals with type 1 diabetes (N = 100; Median IQR). ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001 versus Control (No diabetes). (C) Spearman’s univariate correlation matrix corrected by Holm’s method. Significant r coefficients for positive associations are shown in dark blue—P ≤ 0.001 and light blue P ≤ 0.01 and significant negative relationships in red—P ≤ 0.001. BMI body mass index, sAF skin autofluorescence, Duration, diabetes duration.

Table 1 Baseline clinical and anthropometric characteristics.

General linear modelling for sAF with sequential addition of covariates, is shown in Table 2 for the full cohort. In Model 1 (Full cohort; N = 399 participants), diabetes duration and BMI were significant independent positive predictors, whilst height was a negative independent predictor of sAF (Adjusted r2 = 0.14, P = 1.47 × 10–12). This model was not appreciably improved by the addition of age and sex (Model 2; Adjusted r2 = 0.14, P = 8.77 × 10–12).

Table 2 General linear modelling for sAF predictors in the full cohort and DKD risk in the renal sub-study.

In those who had biological samples taken (Renal sub-set; Suppl. Table 1; Fig. 1; N = 148), individuals with type 1 diabetes had significantly higher eGFR and lower serum cystatin C and progressive increases in uACR, as DKD risk increased (Fig. 2A), as predicted. In this Renal sub-set, 12.8% of males and 10.3% of females with type 1 diabetes had microalbuminuria. BMI was greater in young individuals with type 1 diabetes (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2
figure2

Advanced Glycation end products (AGE) and risk for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) risk in the Renal Sub-set. Characteristics of control individuals without diabetes (N = 49) and individuals with type 1 diabetes stratified by risk for DKD using tertiles of urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (uACR; Low Risk , N = 27; Medium Risk, N = 29; High Risk, N = 33. (A) Measurement of renal function using eGFR was calculated by the CKD-EPICYS formula, serum cystatin C (mg/L) for all participants and mean uACR in those with diabetes. (B) BMI (C) Assessment of AGE burden using sAF (skin autofluorescence), plasma soluble RAGE concentrations and the circulating glycated proteins fructosamine albumin and HbA1C. Data are median (IQR). *P < 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001 versus No diabetes (Control); P < 0.05 versus Low Risk. P < 0.05 versus Control. nd – not determined.

When examining AGE burden in the renal sub-set, sAF remained greater, as per the full cohort, in individuals with type 1 diabetes versus control (Fig. 2C, P = 0.0004) and was modestly higher in subjects at greatest risk for DKD. Using general linear modelling with sequential addition of covariates, Model 1 explained 17.3% of variance in sAF (Adjusted r2 = 0.17, P = 1.0 × 10–6), where BMI, diabetes duration and height were independent variables (Suppl. Table 2). This was strengthened by the addition of random BG in Model 2 (Adjusted r2 = 0.20, P = 3.6 × 10–7) but not further improved by the addition of age and sex in Model 3 (Suppl. Table 2; Adjusted r2 = 0.20, P = 1.0 × 10–6).

Serum soluble RAGE (sRAGE) concentrations differed between control and low (P < 0.05), but not medium or high risk individuals (Fig. 2C; P = 0.069). Overall, circulating sRAGE was lower in those youth with type 1 diabetes (973 ± 349 pg/ml) versus controls (1184 ± 379 pg/ml, P = 0.0245). The glycated proteins HbA1C and fructosamine albumin, each indicative of longer-term glycaemic control, were greatest in the high versus low risk tertile for DKD (Fig. 2C). Urinary excretion of both the protein bound and free AGEs, MG-H1 and CML, did not differ between risk groups (Suppl. Fig. 1). A Holm’s corrected Spearman’s correlation matrix showed that sAF was positively related to age, BMI and risk for DKD in the renal sub-set. Risk for DKD was positively related to BMI, diabetes duration, eGFR and random BG (Suppl. Fig. 1A). Soluble RAGE concentrations were negatively associated with BMI and diabetes duration (Suppl. Fig. 1A).

Using univariate analysis in just those individuals with type 1 diabetes, sAF was positively associated with age (r = 0.37, P = 0.0008), diabetes duration (r = 0.22, P = 0.047 and BMI (r = 0.27, P = 0.017) and height (r = 0.27, P = 0.017), but not with any indices of glycaemic control, including HbA1C or other AGE measurements. uACR was most strongly related to plasma sRAGE (r = 0.30, P = 0.0068) and urinary MG-H1 concentrations (r = 0.33, P = 0.0025) in individuals with type 1 diabetes. These associations did not persist following Holm’s adjustment. eGFR remained independent to all patient variables collected in this sub-analysis of individuals with type 1 diabetes. Indeed, even a model containing uACR, diabetes duration, age, sex, BMI, HbA1C, SBP, random BG and total cholesterol explained only ~ 4% of variance in eGFR in youth with type 1 diabetes and was not significant (Adjusted r = -0.0375, Pmodel = 0.7293). Addition of urinary CML, MG-H1, sAF and circulating sRAGE did not appreciably improve the model.

General linear modelling for DKD risk with sequential addition of covariates in the renal sub-study, is shown in Table 2. Firstly, eGFR predicted 23% of the variance in DKD risk (Adjusted r = 0.25, P = 2.3 × 10–9). In Model 1 (Adjusted r = 0.25, P = 2.2 × 10–9), eGFR (P = 5.5 × 10–9) and sAF (P = 0.04) were significant independent predictors of DKD risk. With additional adjustment for diabetes duration (Table 2; Model 2, Adjusted r = 0.51, P < 2.2 × 10–16), the ability of the model to predict DKD risk variance doubled to greater than 50%. eGFR remained an independent predictor of DKD risk in this model (P = 1.2 × 10–4 ). With the addition of random blood glucose in Model 3, diabetes duration and eGFR remained independent predictors of DKD risk but the prediction of DKD risk by this model only modestly increased (Table 2, Model 3; Adjusted r = 0.56, P < 2.2 × 10–16). With the addition of height and sex in Model 4, diabetes duration, FBG and eGFR remained independent predictors of DKD risk, but overall the prediction of DKD risk did not appreciably increase (Table 2, Model 4; Adjusted r = 0.56, P < 2.2 × 10–16). The addition of circulating sRAGE and urinary AGEs did not alter the explained variance in DKD risk in any of these models.

Discussion

In the present study, biomarkers of DKD related to advanced glycation were investigated in youth. Greater eGFR, random blood glucose concentrations and diabetes duration were independent markers for DKD, accounting for > 55% of variation in this young renal cohort. Risk prediction models were not further improved by the addition of skin autofluorescence (sAF), nor other AGE or sRAGE measurements. In our larger population where biological samples were not available, diabetes duration, BMI and height were significant independent predictors of sAF. Height may have been influenced by a modestly greater proportion of males and was not related to sex in univariate analysis. However, the inverse relationship between sAF and height may also be explained by previous studies suggesting that after diabetes diagnosis, those adolescents with the poorest glycaemic control, end up with the greatest deficit in final height24,25. Certainly those with poorer glycaemic control would not only be more likely to have higher sAF but also greater risk for chronic complications25. However, together these covariates explained only ~ 13% of sAF variance in our entire population and ~ 20% in the renal sub-study with the addition of random blood glucose concentrations. This implies that other major factors are contributing to sAF in young adults at the age groups we are examining that were not identified in this study. Indeed, while sAF is known to increase in parallel with age and diabetes duration in young people26, height has not been previously identified as a predictor of sAF in this group.

sAF was significantly greater in young people with type 1 diabetes compared to controls, which is consistent with previous work in adults27,28,29 and in children and adolescents26. However, when considering the renal sub-study who had biological samples taken, sAF was an independent predictor of DKD risk in a model that included eGFR. Certainly in a previous study, sAF did increase according to chronic kidney disease stage30 and within the DCCT/EDIC study, a slightly older cohort than ours, predicted the development of both micro- and macrovascular disease, including kidney disease. With addition of diabetes duration to our models, where sAF has shown dependency in previous studies12, the variability in DKD risk significantly improved to > 50%. Indeed, diabetes duration has been consistently shown as an important determinant of complication risk in diabetes as shown in the present study.

Glycaemic control is the most commonly targeted risk factor for DKD, but target control is notoriously difficult to achieve in youth31. Certainly, addition of random blood glucose concentrations to diabetes duration, eGFR and sAF explained more of the variance in DKD risk in the renal cohort (up to 56%). Other measures of glycaemic control, namely fructosamine albumin, which are both glycated proteins but early advanced glycation adducts, were elevated with diabetes to a greater degree in high risk individuals. Unfortunately, these measurements were not available in our control subjects. However, adding these variables did not appreciably improve DKD risk prediction in individuals with type 1 diabetes. It is possible that youth in the present study were assessed too early in the course of disease for measures of advanced glycation, such as sAF, to differentiate those at higher risk for DKD. Indeed, we had specifically excluded youth with previously diagnosed kidney disease. Further, most previous studies demonstrating that sRAGE32 and AGEs33 as independent predictors of DKD or macrovascular disease in diabetes, were performed in older people. Interestingly, in the Adolescent Type 1 Diabetes Cardio-Renal Intervention Trial (AdDIT), HbA1c measurements were remarkably similar among groups and did not align with greater DKD risk34. However, in recent follow up of these adolescents from AdDIT at a similar age to our cohort, HbA1c concentrations were significantly higher in those individuals previously allocated to the upper tertile of uACR, and predicted to be at greatest risk for DKD23. This agrees with HbA1C concentrations in our youth with type 1 diabetes, which were higher in those at greatest risk for DKD. Additionally, in young people with type 1 diabetes, complications including DKD, often initially progress without changes in conventional risk factors, such as HbA1C35. This suggests that the development of DKD in the early stages may not be as reliant on poor glycaemic control as previously thought and abnormalities in uACR may, in fact precede worsening glycaemic control.

Surprisingly, a model which explained eGFR variance (to greater than 5%) in individuals with type 1 diabetes using sequential addition of all of the covariates collected, could not be found in this cohort of 15–25 year olds. This suggests that other factors may be driving eGFR changes at this early time point in the development of diabetic kidney disease. Furthermore, youth with type 1 diabetes had significantly higher eGFR values compared to controls, indicating hyperfiltration. This outcome is consistent with the recent follow up of the AdDIT cohort, in which eGFR was also greater in those young people in the highest tertile of uACR23. Hyperfiltration is present in the majority of young people with type 1 diabetes including in the present study, and likely precedes progressive decline in eGFR36. Indeed, a meta-analysis of 12 studies, which included youth and adults, found that people with the most significant hyperfiltration were more likely to progress to DKD37. In young people and adults with hyperfiltration, a greater increase in uACR was also present over the 8 year follow up period, compared to those with normal glomerular filtration38. However, other studies in young people have not identified a link between hyperfiltration and microalbuminuria39. In young people in the Oxford Regional Prospective Study, the cumulative prevalence of microalbuminuria was 50.7% after 19 years of diabetes2. This is approximately 10 years later than the cohorts examined here, where ~ 12% of individuals with diabetes had microalbuminuria despite the present study excluding individuals with pre-existing kidney disease requiring medication. It is important to note however that rates of microalbuminuria do vary in adolescents in the general population, where rates of between 3.3 and 14% have been reported40. DKD is known to develop progressively with some subjects frequently reverting to normoalbuminuria, suggesting that subtle changes in eGFR are important to monitor alongside uACR in youth with type 1 diabetes.

In addition to eGFR, BMI was also significantly higher in youth with type 1 diabetes compared to controls. However risk did not vary among DKD risk tertiles, which is in agreement with the recent AdDIT follow up study, where BMI also did not significantly differ among uACR tertiles23. In the present study, BMI was positively associated with sAF and was an independent predictor of sAF in a model that included diabetes duration and height. This positive association has been previously described in adults with11,41 and without diabetes42. The increased AGE accumulation in people with higher BMI could be a result of increased dietary intake of AGEs or oxidative stress43, but some factors known to affect sAF were not assessed in the present study. Indeed, lower sRAGE concentrations in our youth with type 1 diabetes, could adversely impact AGE clearance. Lower sRAGE also consistently associates with greater BMI and a causal link between obesity and DKD in adults with type 1 diabetes has been demonstrated44.

Limitations

Limitations of the present study include the absence of control data for eGFR, HbA1C, fructosamine, uACR, and urinary AGEs. Furthermore, numerous factors are known to influence sAF levels, which were not controlled in this study, including HbA1C (for the control group), alcohol and coffee consumption and smoking42. Importantly, ethnicity was not recorded, which is known to influence sAF. The timing and AGE content of a participant’s previous meal could also have conceivably increased sAF post-prandially45. However, the influence of these factors on sAF in this cohort is likely to be relatively small when compared with the presence of diabetes per se. Additionally, the limitations of the AGE reader used to measure sAF have been previously described, but it has been validated as a reliable surrogate marker of AGE burden in an adolescent population46. Finally, given that this was a cross-sectional observational study, we did not have follow up data for these individuals to determine if/when they developed diabetic kidney disease.

Conclusion

Taken together, these studies suggest that greater eGFR and diabetes duration in youth with type 1 diabetes without previously diagnosed complications are markers of DKD risk, which are not improved by measurement of sAF nor other markers of AGE burden. However, there may be some utility for the routine measurement of early glycation adducts such as fructosamine albumin, in addition to more routine HbA1C. Further, early changes in eGFR during diabetes should be monitored alongside uACR to better stratify those young people with type 1 diabetes at greatest risk for DKD and CVD. This is of significant interest, as current methods for prediction of early DKD are poor, which often delays appropriate clinical management until more advanced complications develop47. Additional longitudinal studies are required to better establish risk factors for GFR decline, since this could not be ascertained in this study and appeared independent of uACR.

References

  1. 1.

    Webster, A. C., Nagler, E. V., Morton, R. L. & Masson, P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet 389, 1238–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32064-5 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Amin, R. et al. The relationship between microalbuminuria and glomerular filtration rate in young type 1 diabetic subjects: the Oxford Regional Prospective Study. Kidney Int. 68, 1740–1749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00590.x (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J. Pediatr. 125, 177–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70190-3 (1994).

  4. 4.

    Marcovecchio, M. L. et al. ACE inhibitors and statins in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1733–1745. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1703518 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pacaud, D., Yale, J.-F., Stephure, D., Trussell, R. & Davies, H. D. Problems in transition from pediatric care to adult care for individuals with diabetes. Can. J. Diabetes 29, 13–18 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nakhla, M., Daneman, D., To, T., Paradis, G. & Guttmann, A. Transition to adult care for youths with diabetes mellitus: findings from a universal health care system. Pediatrics 124, e1134. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0041 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Frank, M. Factors associated with non-compliance with a medical follow-up regimen after discharge from a pediatric diabetes clinic. Can. J. Diabetes Care 20, 13–20 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dart, A. B. et al. High burden of kidney disease in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 35, 1265. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2312 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Costacou, T. & Orchard, T. J. Cumulative kidney complication risk by 50 years of type 1 diabetes: the effects of sex, age, and calendar year at onset. Diabetes Care 41, 426–433. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1118 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Genuth, S. et al. Glycation and carboxymethyllysine levels in skin collagen predict the risk of future 10-year progression of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy in the diabetes control and complications trial and epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications participants with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 54, 3103–3111. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3103 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Meerwaldt, R. et al. Simple non-invasive assessment of advanced glycation endproduct accumulation. Diabetologia 47, 1324–1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-004-1451-2 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cho, Y. H. et al. Higher skin autofluorescence in young people with Type 1 diabetes and microvascular complications. Diabetic Med. J. Br. Diabetes Assoc. 34, 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13280 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Januszewski, A. S. et al. Non-invasive measures of tissue autofluorescence are increased in Type 1 diabetes complications and correlate with a non-invasive measure of vascular dysfunction. Diabetes Med. 29, 726–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03562.x (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Orchard, T. J. et al. The association of skin intrinsic fluorescence with type 1 diabetes complications in the DCCT/EDIC study. Diabetes Care 36, 3146–3153. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2661 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Araszkiewicz, A. et al. Skin autofluorescence is associated with carotid intima-media thickness, diabetic microangiopathy, and long-lasting metabolic control in type 1 diabetic patients: Results from Poznan Prospective Study. Microvasc. Res. 98, 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2015.01.002 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kostolanska, J., Jakus, V. & Barak, L. HbA1c and serum levels of advanced glycation and oxidation protein products in poorly and well controlled children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM 22, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem.2009.22.5.433 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Berg, T. J., Dahl-Jorgensen, K., Torjesen, P. A. & Hanssen, K. F. Increased serum levels of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in children and adolescents with IDDM. Diabetes Care 20, 1006–1008. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.6.1006 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tsukahara, H. et al. Formation of advanced glycosylation end products and oxidative stress in young patients with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr. Res. 54, 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1203/01.PDR.0000076662.72100.74 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Coughlan, M. T. et al. Advanced glycation urinary protein-bound biomarkers and severity of diabetic nephropathy in man. Am. J. Nephrol. 34, 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1159/000331064 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Busch, M. et al. The advanced glycation end product N(epsilon)-carboxymethyllysine is not a predictor of cardiovascular events and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetic kidney disease and hypertension. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 48, 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.07.009 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    American Diabetes, A. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 41, S13-S27, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S002 (2018).

  22. 22.

    Deo, P. et al. Dietary sugars and related endogenous advanced glycation end-products increase chromosomal DNA damage in WIL2-NS cells, measured using cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Mutagenesis 35, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geaa002 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Marcovecchio, M. L. et al. Renal and Cardiovascular risk according to tertiles of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio: the adolescent type 1 diabetes cardio-renal intervention trial (AdDIT). Diabetes Care 41, 1963. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1125 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ahmed, M. L., Connors, M. H., Drayer, N. M., Jones, J. S. & Dunger, D. B. Pubertal growth in IDDM is determined by HbA1c levels, sex, and bone age. Diabetes Care 21, 831–835. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.5.831 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Marcovecchio, M. L., Heywood, J. J., Dalton, R. N. & Dunger, D. B. The contribution of glycemic control to impaired growth during puberty in young people with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Pediatr. Diabetes 15, 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12090 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    van der Heyden, J. C. et al. Increased skin autofluorescence of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes despite a well-controlled HbA1c: results from a cohort study. BMC Endocr. Disord. 16, 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-016-0129-3 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bakker, S. F. et al. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and the soluble receptor for AGE (sRAGE) in patients with type 1 diabetes and coeliac disease. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 25, 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2014.10.009 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Skrha, J. Jr. et al. Skin autofluorescence relates to soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products and albuminuria in diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Res. 2013, 650694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/650694 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sugisawa, E., Miura, J., Iwamoto, Y. & Uchigata, Y. Skin autofluorescence reflects integration of past long-term glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 36, 2339. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1077 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tanaka, K. et al. Skin autofluorescence is associated with renal function and cardiovascular diseases in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrol. Dialysis Transpl. Off. Publ. Eur. Dialysis Transpl. Assoc. Eur. Renal Assoc. 26, 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq369 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Miller, K. M. et al. Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the US: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 38, 971–978. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0078 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Thomas, M. C. et al. Relationship between levels of advanced glycation end products and their soluble receptor and adverse outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 38, 1891. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0925 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hanssen, N. M. J. et al. Higher plasma methylglyoxal levels are associated with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a 12-year follow-up study. Diabetes 66, 2278. https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-1578 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Marcovecchio, M. L. et al. Adolescent Type 1 Diabetes Cardio-Renal Intervention Trial (AdDIT): urinary screening and baseline biochemical and cardiovascular assessments. Diabetes Care 37, 805–813. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1634 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Forbes, J. M. & Fotheringham, A. K. Vascular complications in diabetes: old messages, new thoughts. Diabetologia 60, 2129–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4360-x (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Palatini, P. Glomerular hyperfiltration: a marker of early renal damage in pre-diabetes and pre-hypertension. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 27, 1708–1714. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs037 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Magee, G. M. et al. Is hyperfiltration associated with the future risk of developing diabetic nephropathy? A meta-analysis. Diabetologia 52, 691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1268-0 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Palatini, P. et al. Glomerular hyperfiltration predicts the development of microalbuminuria in stage 1 hypertension: The HARVEST. Kidney Int. 70, 578–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5001603 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ficociello, L. H. et al. Renal Hyperfiltration and the Development of Microalbuminuria in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 32, 889. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1560 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sanchez-Bayle, M. et al. Urinary albumin excretion in Spanish children: Nino Jesus Group. Pediatr. Nephrol. 9, 428–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00866717 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lutgers, H. L. et al. Skin Autofluorescence as a noninvasive marker of vascular damage in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 29, 2654. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc05-2173 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    van Waateringe, R. P. et al. Lifestyle and clinical determinants of skin autofluorescence in a population-based cohort study. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 46, 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12627 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    van Waateringe, R. P. et al. Skin autofluorescence, a non-invasive biomarker for advanced glycation end products, is associated with the metabolic syndrome and its individual components. Diabetol Metab Syndr 9, 42–42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-017-0241-1 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Todd, J. N. et al. Genetic evidence for a causal role of obesity in diabetic kidney disease. Diabetes 64, 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.2337/db15-0254 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Stirban, A., Nandrean, S., Negrean, M., Koschinsky, T. & Tschoepe, D. Skin autofluorescence increases postprandially in human subjects. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 10, 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2007.0275 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Macsai, E., Takats, Z., Derzbach, L., Korner, A. & Vasarhelyi, B. Verification of skin autofluorescence values by mass spectrometry in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: brief report. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 15, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2012.0251 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Stanton, R. C. Clinical challenges in diagnosis and management of diabetic kidney disease. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 63, S3-21. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.10.050 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of the Diabetes clinic staff at the Mater Young Adult Health Centre and the staff from the University of Queensland practical lectureship.

Funding

This work was supported by the NIH USA (DIACOMP – NIDDK 25034-61) NH&MRC of Australia (GNT1102935;1160428), Diabetes Australia and Mater Foundation. AKF, SLB and SL were supported by Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarships. SLB was supported by The Sybil and Frank Maxfield HDR Top-up Scholarship in Diabetes.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.M.F. designed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted data and prepared the manuscript and is responsible for the contents of the article as guarantor. S.L.B. analyzed and interpreted data and prepared the manuscript. K.B., S.R., T.B., J.N., A.M., S.T., N.dS., H.B., T.O.M.S. assisted type 1 diabetes clinical cohort design and collation. K.M.M., L.K.A., L.A.G., J.B., A.K.F. collected the control cohort data and samples. D.A.Mc., A.Z., K.B., L.A.G., S.R., S.L., S.L.B. performed experiments. T.J., J.C., K.D., M.I., D.J. assisted in study conceptualization and design and gaining financial support. P.D. and L.D. completed the urinary A.G.E. analyses. All authors edited and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josephine M. Forbes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forbes, J.M., Le Bagge, S., Righi, S. et al. Advanced glycation end products as predictors of renal function in youth with type 1 diabetes. Sci Rep 11, 9422 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88786-4

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing