Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84410-7, published online 01 March 2021
The original version of this Article contained an error in discussing the positions of Zilhão, and Wynn and colleagues. The text in the Introduction section,
“By way of illustration, consider the exchange between Zilhão39 and Wynn et al.40. The two parties profoundly disagree about the cognitive differences between modern humans and Neanderthals: whereas Wynn and colleagues claim that the cognitive sophistication of modern humans markedly exceeded that of Neanderthals, Zilhão believes that the two species were indistinguishable. It could (!) be the case that, as Zilhão suggests, this difference of opinion has its roots in a difference of opinion about human progress; it could (!) be that, as Zilhão writes, Wynn et al. are afflicted by “a persistent, if subconscious influence … of Victorian-age ideas of evolution-as-progress and ancient-as-primitive” (p. 52). On Zilhão’s account, claims that Neanderthals are not quite like us betray an outdated form of hierarchical thinking.”
now reads:
“By way of illustration consider the positions of Zilhão39 and Wynn et al.40. The two parties disagree about the cognitive differences between modern humans and Neanderthals: whereas Wynn and colleagues claim that differences in the cognitive abilities of modern humans and Neanderthals were visible to natural selection, Zilhão believes that the two species were indistinguishable. It could be the case that, as Zilhão believes, such a difference of opinion has its roots in a difference of opinion about human progress; it could be that, as Zilhão writes, there exists “a persistent, if subconscious influence in academia of Victorian-age ideas of evolution-as-progress and ancient-as-primitive” (p. 52). On Zilhão’s account, claims that Neanderthals are not quite like us betray an outdated form of hierarchical thinking. On Wynn et al.’s account, claims that Neandertals were indistinguishable are rooted in extreme anti-science versions of contemporary social justice theory. However, whether an archaeologist’s scientific views reflect his or her socio-political views or latent psychological motivations remains to be seen.”
This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vaesen, K., Dusseldorp, G.L. & Brandt, M.J. Author Correction: An emerging consensus in palaeoanthropology: demography was the main factor responsible for the disappearance of Neanderthals. Sci Rep 11, 8450 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88189-5
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88189-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
