Collagen I triggers directional migration, invasion and matrix remodeling of stroma cells in a 3D spheroid model of endometriosis

Abstract

Endometriosis is a painful gynecological condition characterized by ectopic growth of endometrial cells. Little is known about its pathogenesis, which is partially due to a lack of suitable experimental models. Here, we use endometrial stromal (St-T1b), primary endometriotic stromal, epithelial endometriotic (12Z) and co-culture (1:1 St-T1b:12Z) spheroids to mimic the architecture of endometrium, and either collagen I or Matrigel to model ectopic locations. Stromal spheroids, but not single cells, assumed coordinated directional migration followed by matrix remodeling of collagen I on day 5 or 7, resembling ectopic lesions. While generally a higher area fold increase of spheroids occurred on collagen I compared to Matrigel, directional migration was not observed in co-culture or in 12Z cells. The fold increase in area on collagen I was significantly reduced by MMP inhibition in stromal but not 12Z cells. Inhibiting ROCK signalling responsible for actomyosin contraction increased the fold increase of area and metabolic activity compared to untreated controls on Matrigel. The number of protrusions emanating from 12Z spheroids on Matrigel was decreased by microRNA miR-200b and increased by miR-145. This study demonstrates that spheroid assay is a promising pre-clinical tool that can be used to evaluate small molecule drugs and microRNA-based therapeutics for endometriosis.

Introduction

Endometriosis is a common gynaecological disease in which the uterine lining, the endometrium, grows at ectopic locations such as the ovaries and peritoneal cavity1. This disease is currently treated using hormonal therapy and excision surgery. Unfortunately, these treatments are not curative and have high associated side effects and remission rates1,2. While targeted therapies are urgently needed, their development has been hindered by the heterogeneity3,4 and limited mechanistic understanding of the disease.

Based on the widely accepted Sampson’s theory, endometriosis arises when tissue fragments shed during menstruation implant in the surrounding tissue5 (Fig. 1). To implant, endometrial fragments have to first penetrate either through intact barriers consisting of epithelial cells, basement membranes and collagen or directly through a damaged tissue (e.g. due to microtrauma6 or previous surgical procedure7,8,9) and then spread10. In this regard, endometriosis shares many similarities with metastatic cancer11. However, while cancer researchers have devoted considerable attention to dissecting the invasive processes involved in cancer metastases12, little is known about invasive processes in endometriosis.

Figure 1
figure1

Endometriosis modelling in vitro. Left. Sampson’s theory of retrograde menstruation. Menstrual tissue contains stromal condensates (dark blue) and collapsed epithelial glands (pink). Ectopic lesions are frequently described to have a ‘bullet-like appearance’ Right. Spheroids generated using the hanging drop method as a model of collapsed endometrium architecture are placed on either Matrigel or collagen I on day 4 and their phenotype on the hydrogels and the effect of pharmacological intervention is evaluated.

One significant hurdle in studying how endometrial cells invade ectopic tissues has been a lack of suitable experimental models13. To address this, in vitro models of endometriosis consisting of endometrial explants14, organoids3 or single cells combined with chorioallantoic membrane15, amniotic membrane16, peritoneal mesothelial cell monolayers17, peritoneal explants18 and hydrogels19 have been developed. Nevertheless, each of these approaches has some inherent limitations. 2D cell culture is the gold standard, but the invasive and migratory strategies in 2D are markedly different from the coordinated multicellular collective invasion through the extracellular matrix (ECM) that has been observed in vivo20,21. Organoid models typically focus predominantly on epithelial cells and lack the stromal component22. Explants suffer from high heterogeneity, mixed cell population and low throughput23. The promising and integrative tissue engineering approach has so far recreated models of decidual eutopic endometrium rather than lesions or menstrual stage endometrium19.

Menstrual stage endometrium is characterized by stromal reorganization into tightly packed cellular condensates sometimes referred to as ‘blue balls’, collapsed glands and blood debris24. We hypothesized that such collapsed architecture could be modelled using the spheroid culture in vitro. Spheroid culture is a well-established technique that commonly used to study malignancies25. Indeed, endometrial epithelial spheroids generated from 12Z, an endometriotic lesion derived epithelial cell line26 and endometriotic stromal cells27 have already been shown to share histological similarities to lesions better than 2D culture. However, it has not been investigated how endometrial spheroids interact with the ECM.

In this study, we show that endometrial spheroids create structures resembling lesions on collagen I and Matrigel in vitro within 5–7 days. We demonstrate that this assay can dissect the effect of the cell and ECM type as well as of small molecule- and RNA- drugs.

Results

An endometrial stromal cell line (St-T1b), primary endometriotic stromal cells and the endometriotic epithelial cell line (12Z) self-organize into spheroids in hanging drop culture

To capture the heterogeneity of endometrial cells found in lesions, the cells we employed in this study were an immortalized eutopic stromal cell line St-T1b28, primary endometriotic stromal cells (ESCs) and the ectopic light red peritoneal lesion derived epithelial 12Z cell line that was previously shown to be invasive in a Matrigel invasion assay29.

First, we validated that the cells retained their stromal and epithelial morphology in culture. Figure 2A shows that while the St-T1b and ESCs cells have an elongated, fibroblast-like stromal morphology, 12Z cells have a mostly polygonal shape and grow in clusters. Furthermore, on tissue culture (TC) plastic, the stromal cells exhibit more defined actin fibers compared to the 12Z cells. Quantitative analysis (Fig. 2B) confirmed that 12Z cells are significantly smaller (p < 0.0001) than St-T1b and ESCs, where the average area for St-T1b, 12Z and ESCs cells on TC plastic were 2086 ± 904.1 µm2 (n = 29), 787.7 ± 380.9 µm2 (n = 32) and 1989 ± 889.5 µm2 (n = 30).

Figure 2
figure2

Spheroid formation by endometrial cells. (A) F-Actin (red) and nuclei (blue) stained St-T1b, 12Z and ESCs. (B) The projected area in 2D of St-T1b and ESCs is significantly larger than of 12Z cells (n = 29, 32 and 30 cells, Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc test. Data show mean ± s.d.). (C) Bright-field images of fixed spheroids that formed after 4-days using the hanging drop method. Scale bars 250 µm. (D) Co-Culture 1:1 St-T1b:12Z spheroids on day 4 stained by Cell Tracker. Red are St-T1b and green 12Z cells. Scale bar 200 µm. (E) The 12Z spheroids were significantly larger compared to St-T1b and ESCs spheroids (n = 14 prepared across three different preparations, Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc test), the area was measured manually on bright-field images, 10 × magnification. (F) Metabolic-based assay suggests 12Z and Co-Culture spheroids on day 4 consist of a higher number of cells than St-T1b spheroids (n = 3 independent wells and one preparation, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). (G) Spheroid projected area is also significantly larger in 12Z cells and co-culture groups than in the St-T1b group (n = 10–15 independent wells from two different spheroid preparations, Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc test). (H) qPCR analysis comparing gene expression in 2D and 3D spheroids on day 4 of the hanging drop culture in St-T1b cells and (I) qPCR analysis comparing gene expression in 2D and 3D spheroids on day 4 of the hanging drop culture in 12Z cells (n = 3 independent preparations on the same cell lines, multiple t tests). For all figures in the panel *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 and not significant (n.s.) p > 0.05; Data shown as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.) or as mean + s.d.

Recent studies suggested that spheroid culture offers several advantages over 2D culture and confirmed that 12Z cells26 and endometriotic stromal cells27 can assemble into spheroids using the U-bottom 96 well plates27. However, it has not been investigated whether also the hanging drop method can be used to fabricate endometrial spheroids and whether there are any differences between spheroids fabricated from epithelial and stromal endometrial cells alone or their co-culture. We, therefore, evaluated the hanging-drop method, each drop containing 20,000 of stromal or epithelial cells or their co-culture in 20 µL of standard media and selected day 4 as the harvesting day.

Bright-field images (Fig. 2C) show that all the studied cell types self-organized into spheroids. Interestingly, the morphology of the spheroids varied across cell types. St-T1b and ESCs cells assembled into compact, round-spheroids, while the 12Z spheroids were larger and sometimes exhibited slightly branching morphology. We also generated co-culture spheroids from the epithelial 12Z and stromal St-T1b cell lines combined at 1:1 ratio (Fig. 2D). Cell Tracker staining and confocal imaging suggest the two cell populations were homogeneously distributed throughout the spheroid on day 4. Interestingly, while the size of individual 12Z cells in 2D is significantly smaller compared to the ESCs and St-T1b cells, 12Z spheroids were significantly larger compared to St-T1b and ESCs (n = 14, p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001) (Fig. 2E). To exclude that this is due to a cell-counting error, the spheroid size was measured on spheroids prepared three independent times. The co-culture spheroids were also significantly larger compared to St-T1b spheroids (n = 11) and had a higher metabolic activity that is indicative of higher cell count and proliferation over the spheroid formation period (Fig. 2F,G).

Next, we evaluated whether the condensation into spheroids induces changes in gene expression. We analysed a subset of genes related to ectopic tissue invasion. Gene expression analysis revealed that while organisation into spheroids alters the gene expression of several markers in St-T1b cells, none of these markers was significantly altered in 12Z spheroids compared to monoculture across three independent preparations (Fig. 2H,I).

First, we examined the expression of Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1(RAC1/Rac1), a small signalling G protein that directs actin-driven cellular protrusion, microtubule prolongation and the formation of lamellipodia30 both in single cells and at the leading edge during collective migration31. The expression of RAC1 was significantly downregulated in 3D compared to 2D St-T1b (p < 0.01, n = 3) (Fig. 2H).

Spheroid St-T1b culture exhibited higher proteolytic gene expression compared to 2D (Fig. 2H). qPCR analysis revealed that the spheroids exhibit higher expression of the secreted MMP2 (p < 0.0001, n = 3) and the membrane-type metalloproteinase MMP14 (p < 0.05, n = 3) than cells grown in 2D.

As the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) have been implicated in the progression of the disease, we further investigated the expression of mesenchymal markers vimentin (VIM) and cadherin-2 (CDH2) and the epithelial marker cadherin-1 (CDH1) (Fig. 2H). Vimentin expression remained unchanged in both cell lines (p > 0.05, n = 3). The expression of CDH2, a cadherin known to promote invasion in many cell types32, was downregulated in St-T1b spheroids (p < 0.01, n = 3) while the expression of CDH1 was upregulated in St-T1b spheroids (< 0.05 = n = 3) compared to the 2D control.

Matrigel and collagen I trigger distinct phenotypes in single cells and spheroids where stromal condensates create defects on collagen I

Having confirmed that endometrial stromal and epithelial endometriotic cell line as well as their co-culture were able to form spheroids, we evaluated their invasive behaviour on two different ECM-derived hydrogels: Matrigel and collagen I using confocal imaging.

Single cells of all studied cells on Matrigel formed cellular aggregates by day 3(Fig. 3A). While these aggregates remained mostly rounded in St-T1b and ESCs groups, the 12Z cell line aggregates consistently developed multiple multicellular protrusions across several preparations. Cells seeded on collagen I were invading collagen I as single cells (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3
figure3

Lesion-like structures on collagen I and Matrigel. (A) Confocal images of a suspension of endometrial cells after 3 days on Matrigel (top row). Stromal St-T1b and ESCs cellular aggregates consisted of only a few cells and were highly circular and 12Z aggregates were larger and showed protrusions. All cell types invaded collagen I (bottom row) as single cells (maximal intensity projection, scale bar 200 µm, f-actin red, nuclei blue). (B) Confocal images of spheroids after 7 days on Matrigel and collagen I. 12Z exhibited the highest number of protrusions on Matrigel. St-T1b and ESCs created circular defects in collagen I surrounded by cells, whereas epithelial 12Z cells migrated as a sheet and confocal imaging revealed no invasion (maximal intensity projection, scale bar, 200 µm, actin cytoskeleton red, nuclei blue). (C) Detail of three different imaging planes of the edge of the circular defect in St-T1b spheroid in collagen I group. F-actin in red and DNA in blue. Scale bar 100 µm. (D) S-T1b: 12Z co-culture after 7 days on Matrigel (left) and collagen I (right). Scale bar 200 µm.

We next evaluated the spheroid behaviour on Matrigel and collagen I. On the basement membrane (BM) mimic Matrigel, the stromal St-T1b spheroids remained rounded with ESCs exhibiting few protrusions and only the 12Z spheroids consistently developed multiple multicellular protrusions across several preparations. Confocal imaging on day 7(Fig. 3B) revealed that the 12Z protrusive edges consisted of tightly packed cells (DNA in blue) with scant cytoplasm (actin staining in red).

The response of all studied cell types to collagen I as spheroids was markedly different compared to single cells (Fig. 3B). St-T1b and ESC spheroids on collagen I developed into invasive lesion-like structures (Fig. 3B). More specifically, the St-T1b and ESC spheroids gradually invaded collagen I, leaving behind a circularly remodeled matrix with a ring of tightly adhering cells at its margins (Fig. 3B,C). These rings appeared to stabilize the defect and to limit further random cellular spreading outside of the defect in many but not all spheroids.

Interestingly, no matrix defect or directional spreading was detected in co-culture St-T1b:12Z spheroids on collagen I (Fig. 3D). Co-culture spheroids on Matrigel developed protrusive edges similar to the 12Z-only spheroids.

Directional invasion followed by the formation of a circular defect occurs in St-T1b and ESCs spheroids but not in St-T1b:12Z co-culture

Next, we quantified the invasive and migratory patterns on Matrigel and collagen I using bright-field imaging and a parameter that we termed ‘Fold change in the area’ that we defined as the overall projected area, including matrix defects on the day of interest divided by the area on the day 0 or 1 without any sprouts (Fig. 4A). All analysis was done manually in FIJI using the freehand selection tool. While manual measurement has its limitation, especially when the ‘Area’ increases and its margins become irregular, no significant difference in measured areas was observed between different assessors (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4
figure4

Quantification of spheroid behaviour on Matrigel and collagen I. (A) Schematic illustrating how the ‘Fold increase in the area’ was measured and calculated. (B) Validation of the manual measurement method showed no significant difference between different assessors following the defined criteria (n matrigel = 13, n collagen = 16, t test for each condition). (C) Brightfield images on day 1 and 5 of the spheroids on Matrigel (top row) and collagen I (bottom row). Scale bar 500 µm. (D) Quantification of the fold change in area for individual cell types and St-T1b:12Z co-culture (n = 12–15 independent wells per time point and condition collated from three independent spheroid preparations, ncocultures = 4–5, one preparation. Two-way Repeated Measures (RM) ANOVA, Šidák’s multiple comparisons tests). (E) Schematic illustrating how normalized directionality was calculated. (F) Normalized directionally for St-T1b (circles), 12Z (squares) and co-cultures (diamonds) on day 1, 3 and 5 (n = 5–10 wells per experiment collated from two independent preparations, n co-culture = 5 from one preparation). (G) Circular ECM defect quantification-grey colour represents the absence of macroscopic ECM defect and the black colour a presence of a circular defect (n = 13–15 independent wells collated from three separate spheroid preparations, nco-culture = 5 from one preparation. Two-way Repeated Measures (RM) ANOVA, Šidák’s multiple comparisons test) (H) Directional matrix remodeling resulting in a circular defect occured on both 1 mg/mL and 3 mg/mL collagen I hydrogels. For all figures in this panel *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, and n.s. p > 0.05.

Our data show that the ‘Fold change in area’ is significantly higher on collagen I compared to Matrigel across all studied cell types by day 5 (Fig. 4C,D). Confocal imaging combined with brightfield microscopy suggested the stromal spheroids invade (Fig. 3B,C) and migrate on the collagen I matrix directionally (Fig. 4C). To quantify this, we used the parameter ‘Directionality’ that is calculated as the ratio of the distance of the centre of the spheroid core from the centre of the overall migrated area b to the semi-major axis of the overall migrated area a (Fig. 4E). The normalized directionality increased for St-T1b but not for 12Z or co-culture spheroids with time on collagen I, especially between days 3 and 5 (Fig. 4F). The directional invasion was typically followed by matrix remodeling resulting in a circular defect at the area with the densest stromal cell population (Fig. 4G). In our system (3 mg/mL, 40 µL/well) this typically occurred around day 5 or 7 with 84.6% and 53.3% of St-T1b and ESCs, respectively, having a defect on day 7 (n = 13–15 per time point) (Fig. 4G). The defects formed both on 1 mg/mL and 3 mg/mL collagen I hydrogels, suggesting this behavior occurs across a range of collagen I concentrations (Fig. 4H).

Spheroid 3D culture as an effective tool to screen small molecule drug and microRNA-based therapeutics

We then evaluated the potential of the here presented endometrial spheroid in vitro assay to screen the potential therapeutic effect of mechanoregulatory small molecules and micro RNAs (Supplementary Table ST1).

The broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor NNGH limits the invasive behaviour of stromal spheroids on collagen I

Previous studies implicated that MMP signalling plays a role in the formation of early endometriotic lesions15. Our study shows that the broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor 15 µM N-isobutyl-N-(4-methoxyphenylsulfonyl) glycyl hydroxamic acid (NNGH) significantly reduced ‘Fold change in the area’ on collagen I from 10.4 fold to 2.3 fold (n = 6–9) and 9.2 fold to 3.3 fold (n = 6–9) in St-T1b and ESCs, respectively, but did not significantly affect the ‘Fold change in the area’ in 12Z cells (n = 6–9) (Fig. 5A, Supplementary Figure S1). Furthermore, it can be seen from Fig. 5B, that while NNGH treatment prevents the formation of the circular defect on collagen I even after 7 days in culture, the migration of St-T1b and ESCs is not completely eliminated. The effect of NNGH inhibitor on the St-T1b:12Z co-culture was less pronounced and neither the control nor NNGH group formed matrix defects by day 5 (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5
figure5

The effects of small molecule inhibitors on lesion formation. (A) The broad spectrum MMP inhibitor NNGH significantly reduced the in vitro lesion size in St-T1b and ESCs but not in 12Z cells that migrated on collagen I surface. The spheroid size was measured manually on days 0 and 5 (n = 6–9 independent wells across two preparations, multiple t tests). (B) NNGH effectively prevented stromal cells from degrading collagen I (bright field channel) but did not completely prevent the cells from migrating. Confocal images were obtained on fixed samples after 7 days in culture. Scale bar, 200 µm. (C) Co-cultures on collagen I without (top) and with (bottom) NNGH inhibitor on day 5 Scale bar, 200 µm. (D) The ROCK inhibitor Y27632 significantly increased the spreading of endometrial cells on Matrigel after 5 days. Data were compared to the spheroid size on day 0 using bright-field images (n = 8–10 independent wells across two different spheroid preparations, multiple t tests). (E) Y27632 significantly increases metabolic activity in all studied cell types on day 5 (n = 8–9, multiple t tests, three independent preparations). (F) Confocal images demonstrating the increase in the projected area of spheroids of all cell types on Matrigel upon Y27632 treatment Scale bar, 200 µm. (G) ESCs on Collagen I on day 7 with and without Y27632. Y27632 did not prevent collagen I remodeling. Scale bar 500 µm *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 and n.s. p > 0.05; Data shown as mean ± s.d.

ROCK inhibition significantly enhances spreading and invasion of all studied endometrial cell types on Matrigel

The ROCK inhibitor Y27632 significantly (p < 0.01) increased the ‘Fold change in the area’ of all studied cell types on Matrigel compared to DMSO (Fig. 5D). The area occupied by St-T1b, 12Z and ESCs was 17.3, 6.6 and 22.3 fold larger compared to day 0 (Fig. 5E). Y27632 also affected the numbers of metabolically active cells, which were significantly higher compared to controls for St-T1b and 12Z cells on day 5 on Matrigel. Moreover, Y27632 affected spheroid morphology (Fig. 5F). Y27632 on Collagen I resulted in a disaggregation of the spheroid core in St-T1b and ESCs as shown in the Supplementary Figure S2. Treatment with Y27632, in contrast to the MMP inhibitor NNGH, did not prevent Collagen I matrix remodeling in ESCs (Fig. 5G) suggesting the directional remodeling is rather due to proteolytic action than acto-myosin contraction.

The spheroid model reveals context-dependent roles of the mechanoregulatory microRNAs miR-200b and miR-145 on the invasive behaviour of the endometriotic epithelial cell line 12Z on Matrigel

We next investigated whether our in vitro model can be used as a tool to screen the functional effect of various microRNAs on endometrial phenotype. In particular, we selected two microRNAs, miR-200b33 and miR-14534, that have been previously shown to be dysregulated in endometriosis35 and to modulate the invasion and migration of 12Z cells in 2D and Transwell assays. miR-200b acts as a transcriptional repressor of ZEB1/2 and thus downregulates EMT transition36. The miR-145 is upregulated in endometrial lesions and has been described to modulate cytoskeletal dynamics in several cell types, including endometrial, and has many validated targets, including beta and gamma actin, cofilin, fascin, myosin light chain 9 and Rho kinase Rock134,37. The transfection was performed in monolayer culture before the fabrication of spheroids and the effect of microRNAs on spheroid spreading was assessed after 3 days on Matrigel to minimize the effect of miR dilution and degradation38 (Fig. 6A). It can be seen from Fig. 6B that microRNA transfection did not significantly alter the ability of cells to form spheroids and the area of individual spheroids was not significantly different (p > 0.05) across the treatment groups nor was the proliferation (Fig. 6C). We observed spheroid fragmentation of miR-200b transfected cells on Collagen I which resulted in a discontinuous nature of the projected area the size of which could not be reliably quantified (Fig. 6D). MiR-145 significantly reduced the spheroid area compared to scr. miR controls on day 3 on collagen I (Supplementary Figure S3). On Matrigel, the microRNAs, affected sprouting characteristics behaviour of 12Z cells as seen in the bright-field images in Fig. 6E. The miR-200b treatment significantly decreased the number of sprouts per spheroid from ~ 17 to ~ 1, while miR-145 significantly increased the number of sprouts per spheroid to ~ 34 (Fig. 6F,G) and increased the overall sprouting area from 56.12 × 103 ± 21.87 × 103 µm2 per scrambled control miR spheroid to 130.86 × 103 ± 43.47 × 103 µm2 per miR-145 treated spheroids (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 6F,H). In line with previous findings on EMT-marker analysis in 2D-cultured 12Z cells31,33, qPCR analysis of miR-200b-treated 12Z spheroids indicated strong upregulation of CDH1 expression levels, however, the data were not significant due to high variability, since only minute amounts of RNA could be isolated from the spheroids (Supplementary Figure S4).

Figure 6
figure6

The effect of microRNA on 12Z sprouting on Matrigel. (A) Schematic of the workflow (B) none of the microRNAs affected the ability of 12Z cells to self-organize into spheroids and all groups resulted in spheroids with similar area (scale bar = 250 µm, n = 6 independent spheroids prepared across two preparations, ANOVA). (C) None of the microRNA affected overall metabolic activity measured as luminescence compared to scr.miR treated controls. Data are normalized to controls without any microRNA (n = 3 independent wells, ANOVA, one repeat). (D) Representative images of microRNA treated 12Z spheroids after 3 days on collagen I. Scale bar, 500 µm. (E) Representative images of microRNA treated 12Z spheroids after 3 days on Matrigel. Scale bar, 250 µm. (F) A diagram showing how the number of sprouts and the sprouting area parameters were calculated. (G) miR-200 significantly decreased while miR-145 significantly increased the number of sprouts per spheroid after 3 days on Matrigel. (n = 9–10 independent wells across two independent preparations, ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparisons). (H) The overall area occupied by sprouts was significantly larger and smaller when treated with miR-145 and miR-200b, respectively, compared to scr.miR after 3 days on Matrigel (n = 8–10 independent wells across two different preparations, ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparisons, two independent experiments), *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 and n.s. p > 0.05; data expressed as mean ± s.d.

Discussion

Endometriosis is a complex multifactorial disease1. The overall goal of this study was, therefore, to develop a modular 3D in vitro model that makes it possible to study the interplay of different factors that have been proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of endometriosis and screen potential therapeutics in vitro.

First, we demonstrate that the hanging drop method makes it possible to generate endometrial spheroids of reproducible size and thus provides a good alternative to the low-adhesion plate method26,39. Our data show that the spheroid size is consistently cell-type specific, with stromal cells generating smaller spheroids than the epithelial 12Z cells or their co-culture. This is likely due to proliferation of 12Z cell in spheroids as suggested by the cell proliferation assay on spheroids on day 4. qPCR analysis revealed that the spheroid culture affects gene expression. The stromal St-T1b had enhanced expression of the MMP2, MMP14 compared to 2D culture. RAC1, on the other hand, was downregulated in St-T1b spheroids. Spheroids in which Rac1 production was either inhibited or the gene was constitutively expressed had suppressed or enhanced migration in 3D matrices, respectively40. We speculate that it is possible that RAC1 is temporarily downregulated in stromal cells cultured as a suspension spheroid culture. While basal CDH1 expression was very low with a Ct value of 27, as expected for a mesenchymal cell line, we observed a significantly increased expression in 3D culture. We could previously show that CDH1 mRNA expression can be induced in St-T1b cells by external stimuli such as seminal plasma41, however, the upregulation in a 3D environment warrants further investigation. While 12Z cells have been initially characterized as being CDH1 negative28, low expression levels have been subsequently detected by our group in cells authenticated by STR analysis32,33. Our experiments suggest there is no significant difference in any of the analysed markers CDH133, RAC1, ROCK, MMP2 and MMP14 in the 12Z cell line. While another study showed MMP2 expression is upregulated in spheroid compared 2D culture in 12Z cells26, this difference could be due to different spheroid size and culture time.

Endometriosis is marked by the growth of endometrium at ectopic locations1. We, therefore, investigated how epithelial 12Z, ESCs and St-T1b and co-culture spheroids; and single cells interact with two ectopic ECM mimics Matrigel resembling the basement membrane and collagen I mimicking the exposed stroma. The ‘fold increase in the area’ of the spheroids was markedly higher on collagen I than on Matrigel on day 5. Similarly, single cells seeded on top of these hydrogels preferentially invaded collagen I hydrogels. Our results are in agreement with previous studies conducted on cancer cells suggesting that collagen I alone can increase the invasive cellular phenotype and show that this effect is significant across cell types42,43,44. These data also tie well with the previously reported clinical observations that tissue scarring either due to surgery or persistent microtrauma could contribute to the pathogenesis of endometriosis7,8,9.

While the 12Z cell line was created from lesion-derived cells29 based on their ability to penetrate through Matrigel coated invasion chambers, the 12Z single cells in our study only assembled into cellular aggregates with processes and 12Z spheroids developed invasive edges. Previously, Pollock and colleagues also observed only low levels of basal invasion in 12Z cells on Matrigel hydrogels45. We speculate that the limited invasive capacity of 12Z cell observed in this study could be due to the chemotactic gradient that is a key part of the invasion chamber setup. Our group has indeed previously demonstrated that 12Z are invasive under a fetal calf serum gradient33.

Unexpectedly, there was a marked difference between the behaviour of stromal single-cell suspension and spheroids on collagen I. The St-T1b and ESC spheroids but not single cells consistently migrated on, invaded and remodelled collagen I in a directional manner leaving behind a circular defect in the material encircled by the cells that visually resembled peritoneal endometriotic lesions. Given that this was the case for both the St-T1b cell line derived from healthy cells and ectopic ESCs suggests such invasive behavior might be an inherent property of stromal endometrial menstrual condensates and could be critical not only for the pathophysiology of endometriosis but also for normal regeneration of endometrium.

Directional migration followed by matrix remodeling was not observed in the 12Z-spheroid or the 12Z: St-T1b co-culture groups, suggesting the stromal-epithelial interactions modulate stromal invasiveness. While we did not investigate the MMP levels of the co-culture spheroids, previous research determined that the co-culture between endometrial Ishikawa epithelial and telomerase-immortalized stromal cells reduces the MMP2 levels in stromal cells both in the absence of hormonal stimulation and in the presence of 10 nM estradiol concentration46.

In this paper, we further demonstrate that the endometrial spheroid-ECM platform can be used for drug screening of small molecule drugs and micro-RNAs (Fig. 7). We show that the collagen I circular defect caused by stromal cells arises due to matrix degradation via MMPs rather than due to cellular contraction. Both eutopic and ectopic stromal cells had significantly upregulated MMP expression and the MMP inhibitor, NNGH, significantly reduced the size of in vitro stromal lesions on collagen I. These results are in good agreement with Nap and colleagues that demonstrated that inhibiting MMP activity prevents the development of endometriotic lesions in a model combining chicken chorioallantoic membrane model and biopsies of menstrual stage endometrium obtained from healthy donors15. Our results refine this model and show that while, in agreement with the previous studies47, the MMP inhibitor significantly slows down the invasion of spreading of stromal cells on collagen it has little effect on the collective migration of 12Z cells. Another signaling molecule we targeted is ROCK, which is a key regulator of the cytoskeleton30,48. On Collagen I, ROCK inhibitor Y27632 treatment led to a rapid loss of the spheroid core structure compared to controls and Y27632 did not prevent Collagen I remodeling by ESCs suggesting the matrix remodeling is not primarily driven by matrix contraction but rather by MMP proteolytic action. Y27632 further significantly increased the ‘fold change in area’ and cell numbers in vitro on Matrigel in all studied cell types. Similar increase in cellular spreading following the treatment with ROCK inhibitors have been described in microvascular endothelial cells49, retinal pigment epithelial cells50 and osteoblastic cells51. It needs to be noted that Y27632 has a complex effect on phenotype52,53. For example, prior studies demonstrated that Y27632 reduces endometriosis associated fibrosis in vitro54.

Figure 7
figure7

The invasiveness of endometrial spheroids depends both on the cell type (stromal St-T1b and ESCs in brown, epithelial 12Z in blue) and ECM. Invasion and spreading is strongly enhanced by exposed collagen I. Migration on Matrigel is modulated by microRNAs and ROCK inhibitor increases invasion and migration on this substrate. Invasion on collagen is MMP-dependent. Red marks signify experimental intervention. Blunt arrow signifies that an inhibitor was added. Black arrows show the effect of the intervention. Dashed arrow suggest weak effect.

Another promising class of therapeutics targets microRNA signaling35,55. Given that a typical micro-RNA has tens of targets, sequencing studies need to be accompanied by reliable functional assays to be biologically meaningful56. In this study, we demonstrate that the spheroid assay can be used to reproducibly evaluate the effect of individual microRNAs on the complex, multicellular spreading of endometriosis-mimicking constructs over several days. We show that miR-200b treatment of 12Z cells resulted in a reduction of sprout formation, which may be indicative of a less invasive phenotype. Our previous 2D data suggest that miR-200b may have reverted the 12Z phenotype to an epithelial-state33, however, the paucity of RNA in the spheroids did not allow us to unequivocally confirm this hypothesis, as we saw only a non-significant increase in expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin (Supplementary Figure S4). Our spheroid model further revealed that while miR-145 reduces the migrated area on Collagen I compared to controls (Supplementary Figure S3), results which are in agreement with previous in vitro 2D assays34, the microRNA miR-145 up-regulated in ectopic lesions in vivo increases 12Z sprouting on Matrigel in vitro. These findings were unexpected and investigating this into more detail is beyond the main focus of this study. Nevertheless, there is an increasing appreciation that cells adopt a host of invasive and migratory strategies that are highly context-dependent and enabled by distinct signaling pathways. Liu and colleagues observed that miR-145 upregulation enhances angiogenesis, including the sprouting from aortic rings and linked this to the suppression of tropomodulin 3 (TMOD3)57 while we observed that miR-145 inhibits proliferation and migration in breast cancer and endometriotic cells using the Transwell migration and scratch assays32,58. Therefore, miR-145 might influence cellular invasive behaviour not only in cell-type but also invasive/migratory-mode manner and ECM-substrate-dependent manner. While the majority of oncological studies on miR-145 function suggest that it reduces invasive growth by targeting a variety of mRNAs, two studies in trophoblast cells have described invasion-promoting functions of miR-145, which were attributed to a targeting of mucin 1 (MUC1) and leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR), respectively59,60. We can only speculate that the 3D spheroid culture compared to 2D culture of 12Z cells may have altered the expression patterns of miR-145 target mRNAs in a way that alters the response to this epigenetic regulator. For example, miR-145 may target new mRNAs that are not expressed in the 2D setting (or vice versa), resulting in a different net response. Overall, we demonstrate that the spheroid assay can be used as an additional assay to screen for both small molecule and RNA-based therapeutics.

A major limitation of our study is that it relies on cell lines that have been transformed and represent only a limited subset of disease phenotypes and a more extensive primary cell pool will be required to confirm and fully elucidate the here reported findings. We also did not investigate the influence of decidualization. Notably, our study did not incorporate primary endometrial epithelial cells with purely epithelial characteristics. Additionally, the wider implementation of this assay for the study of endometriosis will rely on future advances in the molecular characterization of spheroids and high-throughput image analysis. Furthermore, automated image analysis would significantly increase the throughput of this assay. In recent years, the quality of image processing algorithms has approached that of trained humans while significantly decreasing the time needed to evaluate individual samples61. It needs to be noted that for such algorithms either large training datasets or pre-defined criteria are needed. Given the wide array of spheroid phenotypical responses, we have only started to identify such criteria.

Overall, our screening platform provides evidence that the physiological condensation of endometrial stromal cells into spheroids might play an important role in the development of a subset of endometriotic lesions. As such a directional invasive phenotype in vitro is unlikely to arise by chance, endometrial stromal condensation might also have currently unknown but likely important biological role in the cyclical regeneration of normal endometrium. At the same time, our results show that the epithelial lesion-derived 12Z spheroids also rapidly migrate on collagen I and stromal-epithelial interactions modulate the invasiveness of stromal cells. Previous studies indeed revealed significant heterogeneity and variability among different endometriosis subtypes with several sub-types staining predominantly for stromal markers62.

In conclusion, this study documents that endometrial stromal cell line St-T1b and primary endometriotic stromal cells engage in directional migration with significant collagen I remodeling when cultured in spheroid culture and that this behaviour is inhibited by the broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor NNGH. We anticipate that this assay will be used to gain further insights into invasive processes involved in endometriosis and for the screening of both small molecule and RNA-based drug candidates and their off-target effects.

Methods

Cell culture

The 12Z ectopic epithelial cell line17,29 was maintained in DMEM media (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. D0819, Deisenhofen, Germany,) supplemented with 10% FBS (Biochrom GmbH, cat. no. S0615, Berlin, Germany) and 1% Pen/Strep (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. P4333). The St-T1b cell line28 and primary ectopic lesion-derived stromal cells (ESCs) were maintained in 70% DMEM/18% MCDB 105 media (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. 117-500) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% Pen/Strep, 1% Glutamine and 5 µg/mL insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. 10516). Cells were routinely split twice a week. ESCs were prepared from ectopic lesions and characterized as previously described63. Primary endometriotic stromal cells were prepared from a biopsy of a woman with endometriosis who underwent surgical treatment at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Münster University Hospital in 2013, and stored as aliquoted stocks in liquid nitrogen, which were freshly thawed and passaged in routine culture two times prior to usage in the experiments described. The modified American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification was used to assess endometriosis64. For all ESC experiments, stroma cells derived from a lesion located at the pelvic wall (rASRM score II) of a 19-year-old patient were employed. The study was carried out following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics commission (Ethikkommission der Ärztekammer Westfalen‐Lippe und der Medizinischen Fakultät der WWU; approval no. 1 IX Greb 1 from 19 September 2001, updated 2012). The participant gave written informed consent.

Spheroid formation

Spheroids were generated using the hanging drop method65, where 20 µL drops each containing 20,000 cells were deposited on the top lid of a plastic Petri dish and the bottom chamber was filled with sterile water or PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. D1408). The spheroids were harvested after 4 days at 37 °C and 7.5% or 5% CO2. The co-culture spheroids were formulated at 1:1 12Z:St-T1b ratio.

Preparation of collagen I and Matrigel

A 3 mg/mL collagen I hydrogel was formed by neutralizing and diluting the stock solution of Collagen Type I Rat Tail matrix (Corning, Bedford, MA, USA, cat. No. 354236, 4 mg/mL or 3.4. mg/mL batch) with 1 N NaOH (Applichem, cat. No. A1432, Darmstadt, Germany), 10 × PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. D1408) and chilled deionized water. The amount of 1 N NaOH was calculated as 1 N NaOH volume = (volume of the stock collagen) × 0.023 mL. The amount of 10 × PBS was calculated as volume 10 × PBS = (final volume)/10. Phenol red-free Basement Membrane Matrix Growth Factor Reduced Matrigel (Corning, cat. No. 356231) was thawed on ice prior to use. The gels were deposited into pre-chilled 96-wells at 35–40 µL per well in 9.2–9.4 mg/mL Matrigel. Each 96-well plate was subsequently sealed with parafilm and the gels were left to solidify for 30–60 min at 37 °C. For higher magnification confocal imaging, collagen and Matrigel were deposited on glass coverslips.

Spheroid response to collagen I/Matrigel

Following gel formation, the wells in a 96-well plate were filled with 50 µL of phenol-red free DMEM (Gibco, cat. No. 21063-029, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 5% charcoal-treated FBS (Biochrom GmbH, cat. no. S0615) and 5 µg/mL insulin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. 10516). Subsequently, one to three spheroids per well were manually added to individual wells. The media were changed every 3–5 days and the samples were kept in an incubator at 37 °C and 7.5% CO2. The spheroids were imaged on day 1, 3, 5 and 7.

Metabolic activity measurement

Viability was assessed using the CellTiter-Glo 3D Viability assay (Promega, cat. No. G9681, Walldorf, Germany). Spheroids and surrounding medium were collected after four days and transferred to an opaque-walled 96-well plate. A volume of CellTiter-Glo Reagent equal to the volume of cell culture medium was added. The mix was incubated according to manufacturer instructions and luminescence in the form of relative light units (RLUs) was recorded using a CLARIOstar Plus (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany).

Inhibitors

The effects of three inhibitors on spheroid spreading were evaluated. The MMP inhibitor NNGH (Merck, cat. No. SML0584, Darmstadt, Germany) was stored at 15 mM in DMSO and dissolved to the final concentration of 15 µM in media and the ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. Y0503, 10 mM stock) at 10 µM. In all experiments, spheroids were added directly to inhibitor-containing media. Inhibitor-containing 5% charcoal-treated FBS/insulin media were exchanged every 3 days.

microRNA transfection

The transfection with negative control microRNA (Scr. miR), miR-200b and miR-145 (Table 1) was performed in a 6-well plate on 60–70% confluent cells. Before transfection, the growth media were exchanged for Opti-MEM I Reduced Serum Media (Gibco, cat. no. 31985-070, Thermo-Scientific, Germany). The transfection with 20 nM microRNA of interest (Table 1) was conducted using the Dharmafect reagent (Dharmacon, cat. no. T-2001-03, Lafayette, CO, USA). The cells were incubated with the transfection mixture for 24 h when the media were exchanged for full growth media. MiR spheroids were fabricated 48 h after the addition of transfection media.

Table 1 MicroRNAs used in the study.

Live cell staining and immunostaining

The F-actin cytoskeleton was visualized using Phalloidin CruzFluor 594 Conjugate (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, cat. No. sc-363795, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 1:1000 dilution. The nuclei were visualized using DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. D9564) diluted at 1:50,000. The cells were fixed using 3.7% formaldehyde (Merck, cat. No. 1.04003.1000, Darmstadt, Germany) at 37 °C for 15 min. Following washing with PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. No. D1408), the cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X (Riedel-de-Haen, cat. No. AG 56029, Seelze, Germany) for 5 min. Hydrogels in a 96-well plate were stained by adding 25 µL of the 1:1000 phalloidin dye and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Live cells were stained either with CellTracker Green CMFDA (Thermo Fischer, cat. No. C2925) or CellTracker Red CMTPX (Thermo Fischer, cat. No. C34552) at a concentration of 5 µM according to manufacturer’s instructions prior to mixing two cell types to form a co-culture.

Imaging

Cells were analysed for morphological and cytoskeletal markers. The bright-field images were obtained using either an Axiovert100 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) or an inverted microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) using 5 ×, 10 × and 20 × objectives. Confocal imaging was performed on fixed stained samples in a 96 well plate. Samples were imaged with the Zeiss LSM 880 inverted confocal microscope (10 ×, 0.45 NA) (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with ZEN 2 software and using 11.04 µm z-stack intervals and sequential scanning (514 nm argon laser, 405 nm diode laser, Bright field). The number of sections was adjusted based on the sample thickness.

Image analysis

All images were analysed in FIJI66. Confocal images are depicted as maximal intensity projections. The spheroid area was measured manually by tracing the spheroids using the freehand tool and measure function on Bright-field images of spheroids on Petri Dishes, glass slides or in a 96-well plate. Fold increase in area was calculated as the spheroid area on a given day divided by spheroid size on day 0 or day 1. If on day 1 any protrusions were present and the spheroid was used as a reference size for the given experiment, the protrusions on day 1 were excluded from the analysis to better reflect the size of the original spheroid core. The parameter directionality was calculated as the ratio between the distance in pixels between the centre of the overall migrated area and the centre of the spheroid, divided by the semi-major axis of the overall migrated area of the spheroid (Fig. 4E). The number of sprouts per image was counted manually and the sprouting area was calculated as the total area occupied by an expanding spheroid with sprouts minus the area occupied by the spheroid without any protrusions (Fig. 6F).

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

mRNA isolation was performed with InnuPREP RNA mini kit (Analytikjena, cat. no. 845-KS-2040250, Jena, Germany) according to the supplier’s protocols. The quantity of RNA was measured on an Eppendorf BioPhotometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and considered pure if the absorbance at 260 nm/280 nm was more than 1.8. The concentration of 0.4 µg RNA/10 µL of dH2O was used. cDNA synthesis was performed using High Capacity kit (Applied Biosystems, cat. No. 4368814, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on a TGradient thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany).

PCR

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed using 20 ng cDNA per reaction using the Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher, cat. No. 4304437) and SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher, cat. No. 4344463). Gene expression values were calculated using the mean Ct values of the samples. The expression of target genes was normalized to the housekeeping gene ACT, and then to St-T1b cells line (2−ΔΔCt). The primers were synthesized by Biolegio (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and are listed in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Sybr Green PCR primers.
Table 3 PCR primers Taqman.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using GraphPad Prism8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA). Normal distribution was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. A two-tailed unpaired Student’s t tests were used to analyse statistical significance between two conditions in an experiment. For experiments with three or more comparisons, an ordinary one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used. For data that were not normally distributed, the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test was used. A two-way repeated-measures (RM) ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test was used to evaluate the effect of Matrigel and collagen I on spheroid size over time. Significance values were chosen as *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Error bars represent the mean ± s.d or mean + s.d. All figure panels were assembled in Inkscape 0.92.

References

  1. 1.

    Zondervan, K. T. et al. Endometriosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 9 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Young, V. J., Brown, J. K., Saunders, P. T. K. & Horne, A. W. The role of the peritoneum in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Update 19, 558–569 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Boretto, M. et al. Patient-derived organoids from endometrial disease capture clinical heterogeneity and are amenable to drug screening. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1041–1051 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Abu-Asab, M., Zhang, M., Amini, D., Abu-Asab, N. & Amri, H. Endometriosis gene expression heterogeneity and biosignature: A phylogenetic analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. Int. 2011, 1–12 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sampson, J. A. Peritoneal endometriosis due to the menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 14, 422–469 (1927).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Leyendecker, G., Wildt, L. & Mall, G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: Tissue injury and repair. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 280, 529–538 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhang, P. et al. Cesarean scar endometriosis: Presentation of 198 cases and literature review. BMC Womens Health 19, 14 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gidwaney, R. et al. Endometriosis of abdominal and pelvic wall scars: Multimodality imaging findings, pathologic correlation, and radiologic mimics. RadioGraphics 32, 2031–2043 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Khachani, I., Filali Adib, A. & Bezad, R. Cesarean scar endometriosis: An uncommon surgical complication on the rise? Case report and literature review. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 1–4 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Griffith, J. S., Rodgers, A. K. & Schenken, R. S. Reviews: In vitro models to study the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 17, 5–12 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kasvandik, S. et al. Deep quantitative proteomics reveals extensive metabolic reprogramming and cancer-like changes of ectopic endometriotic stromal cells. J. Proteome Res. 15, 572–584 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Krakhmal, N. V., Zavyalova, M. V., Denisov, E. V., Vtorushin, S. V. & Perelmuter, V. M. Cancer invasion: Patterns and mechanisms. Acta Naturae 7, 17–28 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Grümmer, R. Models of endometriosis: In vitro and in vivo models. In Endometriosis 263–269 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444398519.ch25.

  14. 14.

    Witz, C., Monotoyarodriguez, I. & Schenken, R. Whole explants of peritoneum and endometrium: A novel model of the early endometriosis lesion. Fertil. Steril. 71, 56–60 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nap, A. W., Dunselman, G. A. J., de Goeij, A. F. P. M., Evers, J. L. H. & Groothuis, P. G. Inhibiting MMP activity prevents the development of endometriosis in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane model. Hum. Reprod. 19, 2180–2187 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    van der Linden, P. J. Q., de Goeij, A. F. P. M., Dunselman, G. A. J., Erkens, H. W. H. & Evers, J. L. H. Amniotic membrane as an in vitro model for endometrium–extracellular matrix interactions. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 45, 7–11 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nair, A. S. et al. Modeling the early endometriotic lesion: Mesothelium-endometrial cell co-culture increases endometrial invasion and alters mesothelial and endometrial gene transcription. Fertil. Steril. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.047 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Witzenbichler, B. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C/VEGF-2) promotes angiogenesis in the setting of tissue ischemia. Am. J. Pathol. 153, 381–394 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cook, C. D. et al. Local remodeling of synthetic extracellular matrix microenvironments by co-cultured endometrial epithelial and stromal cells enables long-term dynamic physiological function. Integr. Biol. (Camb) 9, 271–289 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Orellana, R. et al. Important role of collective cell migration and nerve fiber density in the development of deep nodular endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 107, 987-995.e5 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    García-Solares, J., Dolmans, M.-M., Squifflet, J.-L., Donnez, J. & Donnez, O. Invasion of human deep nodular endometriotic lesions is associated with collective cell migration and nerve development. Fertil. Steril. 110, 1318–1327 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Alzamil, L., Nikolakopoulou, K. & Turco, M. Y. Organoid systems to study the human female reproductive tract and pregnancy. Cell Death Differ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-0565-5 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schäfer, W. R. et al. Critical evaluation of human endometrial explants as an ex vivo model system: A molecular approach. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 17, 255–265 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    McCluggage, W. G. Benign Diseases of the Endometrium. in Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract 305–358 (Springer US, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0489-8_7.

  25. 25.

    Nath, S. & Devi, G. R. Three-dimensional culture systems in cancer research: Focus on tumor spheroid model. Pharmacol. Ther. 163, 94–108 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Brueggmann, D. et al. Novel three-dimensional in vitro models of ovarian endometriosis. J. Ovarian Res. 7, 17 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yamanaka, K. et al. Dienogest inhibits aromatase and cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin E2 production in human endometriotic stromal cells in spheroid culture. Fertil. Steril. 97, 477–482 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Samalecos, A. et al. Characterization of a novel telomerase-immortalized human endometrial stromal cell line, St-T1b. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 7, 76 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zeitvogel, A., Baumann, R. & Starzinski-Powitz, A. Identification of an invasive, N-cadherin-expressing epithelial cell type in endometriosis using a new cell culture model. Am. J. Pathol. 159, 1839–1852 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Amano, M., Nakayama, M. & Kaibuchi, K. Rho-kinase/ROCK: A key regulator of the cytoskeleton and cell polarity. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 67, 545–554 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mayor, R. & Etienne-Manneville, S. The front and rear of collective cell migration. Nat. Publ. Gr. 17 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Derycke, L. D. M. & Bracke, M. E. N-cadherin in the spotlight of cell–cell adhesion, differentiation, embryogenesis, invasion and signalling. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 48, 463–476 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Eggers, J. C. et al. microRNA miR-200b affects proliferation, invasiveness and stemness of endometriotic cells by targeting ZEB1, ZEB2 and KLF4. Reprod. Biomed. Online 32, 434–445 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Adammek, M. et al. MicroRNA miR-145 inhibits proliferation, invasiveness, and stem cell phenotype of an in vitro endometriosis model by targeting multiple cytoskeletal elements and pluripotency factors. Fertil. Steril. 99, 1346-1355.e5 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ohlsson Teague, E. M. C. et al. MicroRNA-regulated pathways associated with endometriosis. Mol. Endocrinol. 23, 265–275 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yu, J. et al. miR-200b suppresses cell proliferation, migration and enhances chemosensitivity in prostate cancer by regulating Bmi-1. Oncol. Rep. 31, 910–918 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Xin, M. et al. MicroRNAs miR-143 and miR-145 modulate cytoskeletal dynamics and responsiveness of smooth muscle cells to injury. Genes Dev. 23, 2166–2178 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bartlett, D. W. & Davis, M. E. Insights into the kinetics of siRNA-mediated gene silencing from live-cell and live-animal bioluminescent imaging. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 322–333 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shimizu, Y. et al. Dienogest, a synthetic progestin, inhibits prostaglandin E2 production and aromatase expression by human endometrial epithelial cells in a spheroid culture system. Steroids 76, 60–67 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mackay, J. L., Sood, A. & Kumar, S. Three-dimensional patterning of multiple cell populations through orthogonal genetic control of cell motility. Soft Matter 10, 2372–2380 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ibrahim, M. G. et al. Seminal plasma (SP) induces a rapid transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1)—independent up-regulation of epithelial–mesenchymal transdifferentiation (EMT) and myofibroblastic metaplasia-markers in endometriotic (EM) and endometrial cells. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 299, 173–183 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Burleson, K. M., Hansen, L. K. & Skubitz, A. P. N. Ovarian carcinoma spheroids disaggregate on type I collagen and invade live human mesothelial cell monolayers. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 21, 685–697 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Carey, S. P., Martin, K. E. & Reinhart-King, C. A. Three-dimensional collagen matrix induces a mechanosensitive invasive epithelial phenotype. Sci. Rep. 7, 42088 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sodek, K. L., Brown, T. J. & Ringuette, M. J. Collagen I but not Matrigel matrices provide an MMP-dependent barrier to ovarian cancer cell penetration. BMC Cancer 8, 223 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pollock, K., Jaraczewski, T. J., Carroll, M. J., Lebovic, D. I. & Kreeger, P. K. Endometriotic epithelial cell response to macrophage-secreted factors is dependent on extracellular matrix context. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 7, 409–420 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Schutte, S. C., James, C. O., Sidell, N. & Taylor, R. N. Tissue-engineered endometrial model for the study of cell-cell interactions. Reprod. Sci. 22, 308–315 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Osteen, K. G., Yeaman, G. R. & Bruner-Tran, K. L. Matrix metalloproteinases and endometriosis. Semin. Reprod. Med. 21, 155–164 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wozniak, M. A., Desai, R., Solski, P. A., Der, C. J. & Keely, P. J. ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. J. Cell Biol. 163, 583–595 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Breyer, J. et al. Inhibition of Rho kinases increases directional motility of microvascular endothelial cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 83, 616–626 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kamao, H., Miki, A. & Kiryu, J. ROCK inhibitor-induced promotion of retinal pigment epithelial cell motility during wound healing. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 9428738 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zhang, X. et al. Rho kinase inhibitors stimulate the migration of human cultured osteoblastic cells by regulating actomyosin activity. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 16, 279–295 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Honjo, M. et al. Potential role of Rho-associated protein kinase inhibitor Y-27632 in glaucoma filtration surgery. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 5549–5557 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chin, V. T. et al. Rho-associated kinase signalling and the cancer microenvironment: Novel biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 17, e17 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Yuge, A., Nasu, K., Matsumoto, H., Nishida, M. & Narahara, H. Collagen gel contractility is enhanced in human endometriotic stromal cells: A possible mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of endometriosis-associated fibrosis. Hum. Reprod. 22, 938–944 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Laudanski, P. et al. MicroRNAs expression profiling of eutopic proliferative endometrium in women with ovarian endometriosis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 11, 78 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kuhn, D. E. et al. Experimental validation of miRNA targets. Methods 44, 47–54 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Liu, C. H., Wang, Z., Huang, S., Sun, Y. & Chen, J. MicroRNA-145 regulates pathological retinal angiogenesis by suppression of TMOD3. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 16, 335–347 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ding, Y. et al. MiR-145 inhibits proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells by directly or indirectly regulating TGF-β1 expression. Int. J. Oncol. 50, 1701–1710 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lv, Y. et al. miR-145-5p promotes trophoblast cell growth and invasion by targeting FLT1. Life Sci. 239, 117008 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Chi, Z. & Zhang, M. Exploration of the regulation and control mechanisms of mir-145 in trophoblast cell proliferation and invasion. Exp. Ther. Med. 16, 5298–5304 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kassis, T., Hernandez-Gordillo, V., Langer, R. & Griffith, L. G. OrgaQuant: Human intestinal organoid localization and quantification using deep convolutional neural networks. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–7 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Matsuzaki, S. & Darcha, C. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition-like and mesenchymal to epithelial transition-like processes might be involved in the pathogenesis of pelvic endometriosis†. Hum. Reprod. 27, 712–721 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ramirez Williams, L. et al. γ-Secretase inhibition affects viability, apoptosis, and the stem cell phenotype of endometriotic cells. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13707 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Canis, M. et al. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil. Steril. 67, 817–821 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Foty, R. A simple hanging drop cell culture protocol for generation of 3D spheroids. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/2720 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Anna Starzinski-Powitz for the generous gift of 12Z cells, and Birgit Gellersen for the generous gift of the St-T1b cell line, Birgit Pers and Dorothea Godulla for expert technical assistance, Niki Loges for help with confocal microscopy, Timo Strünker for providing access to equipment, and Peter Friedl for helpful discussions. This research was supported by a WiRe—Women in Research Fellowship and a WWU Fellowship of the University of Münster (to AS) and European Commission (REA) EU H2020‐MSCA-RISE‐2015 Grant 691058 MOMENDO (to MG). We acknowledge funding by the Open Access Publishing Fund of Münster University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.S. and V.F. performed the majority of the experiments and analysed the data. A.S. drafted the figures and wrote the manuscript draft. M.N., Y.S. and M.-K.W. helped to establish the 3D system by assisting with experiments, and by providing unpublished data and expertise in 3D culture. K.B. performed confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. S.D.S. and L.K. provided patient tissues and documented clinical data. B.G. provided resources, advice and expertise in 3D and primary cell culture and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. L.K. provided resources and general support. M.G. oversaw and coordinated the study and wrote the manuscript M.G. and A.S. conceived the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anna Stejskalová or Martin Götte.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stejskalová, A., Fincke, V., Nowak, M. et al. Collagen I triggers directional migration, invasion and matrix remodeling of stroma cells in a 3D spheroid model of endometriosis. Sci Rep 11, 4115 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83645-8

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing