Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75994-7, published online 02 November 2020
The original version of this Article contained errors. The location of the Blue Fish Cave was incorrectly listed as the USA; the cave is located in Canada. Additionally, References 7 and 34 were incorrectly used to support the location of this site. This is now corrected and in the Discussion and Conclusions.
“Its use on controversial marks from Arroyo Vizcaíno (Uruguay), the Cerutti Mastodon site or Blue Fish Cave (USA)7,33,34 should provide reliable assessment on the purported human nature of the modifications reported in those assemblages.”
now reads:
“Its use on controversial marks from Arroyo Vizcaíno (Uruguay), the Cerutti Mastodon site (USA) or Blue Fish Cave (Canada) 7,33,34 should provide reliable assessment on the purported human nature of the modifications reported in those assemblages.”
and
“One groove from a coxa (specimen #15.6.5) found at the 18 ka site of Bluefish cave (Alaska, USA) interpreted as a filleting cut mark7,33,34, is classified by the model as trampling mark (Fig. 3).”
These references are now removed and the sentence reads:
“One groove from a coxa (specimen #15.6.5) found at the 18 ka site of Bluefish cave (Yukon, Canada) interpreted as a filleting cut mark33, is classified by the model as trampling mark (Fig. 3).”
Finally, the Supplementary Information file inaccurately reported that faunal assemblage is composed of 3,600 bone specimens. The assemblage is composed of 36,000 bone specimens.
These errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the Article and in the Supplementary Information file.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Domínguez‑Rodrigo, M., Cifuentes‑Alcobendas, G., Jiménez‑García, B. et al. Author Correction: Artificial intelligence provides greater accuracy in the classification of modern and ancient bone surface modifications. Sci Rep 11, 3708 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82916-8
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82916-8
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
