Abstract
A cross-sectional study of 21,665 Japanese residents was performed to investigate the prevalence of central sensitization syndromes (CSS). CSS were assessed using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-A). CSS were defined as a CSI-A score of 40 or higher. Age, sex, district, 10 CSS-related diseases (CSI-B), lifestyle, and mental factors were rated in a self-reported survey. The prevalence of CSS and its relationship with potential factors were examined by sex using descriptive and logistic regression models. The prevalence of CSS was 4.2% in all participants and was significantly higher in women (4.9%) than in men (2.7%). Adjusted odds ratios correlated with CSS for an age of 80–97 years versus 60–79 years (2.07 and 2.89), one or more CSI-B diseases (3.58 and 3.51), few sleeping hours (2.18 and 1.98), high perceived stress (5.00 and 4.91), low (2.94 and 2.71) and high (0.45 and 0.66) resilience versus moderate resilience, and exercise habits (0.68 and 0.55) in men and women (all P < 0.05). The relationship between CSS and age 20 and 59 years, ex-smokers, coffee intake, and alcohol intake differed by sex. The prevalence of CSS was estimated to be low in the healthy population. CSS correlated with CSS-related diseases and some positive and negative factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In clinical medicine, central sensitization syndromes (CSS) are overlapping disorders of multiple psychoneurological, musculoskeletal, and chronic pain-related diseases1,2,3. CSS mainly include fibromyalgia (FM), restless leg syndrome (RLS), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), temporomandibular joint disorder (TJD), migraine or tension-type headaches (M/TTH), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)1,2,4,5. CSS are characterized by complex physical and mental symptoms, mainly disproportionate pain and diffuse pain distribution manifested by hypersensitivity of the central neurons, which have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients1,2,6. CSS are intractable and there are currently no established medical interventions due to the lack of a clinically obvious pathology4,7.
In 2012, Mayer et al. initially developed Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) part A, comprising 25 symptoms, and part B, consisting of 10 diseases, to evaluate CSS8. A 40-point cut-off score of CSI part A was recommended to classify the presence of CSS in patients with chronic pain6,8. Many clinical studies have since reported the rates of a CSI score ≥ 40 in patients with CSS-related diseases: 11.0% in 290 orthopedic patients with musculoskeletal pain, including the neck, shoulders, hips, knees, or ankles9, 13% in 238 patients with low back pain10, 34.9% in 66 patients with pelvic floor muscle tenderness11, 48.4% in 91 patients with osteoarthritis12, 68.2% in 763 patients with chronic spinal pain disorder13, and 84% in 32 patients with hereditary neuropathy14. These findings demonstrated that the prevalence of CSS varied in a CSS-related disease-dependent manner; however, data on the general population is lacking.
Neblett et al. previously reported that the rate of a CSI score ≥ 40 was 24.8% in 129 non-patient subjects, with an average CSI score (SD) of 30.9 (12.3)15,16. Other studies found average CSI scores (SD) of 37.1 (15.0) in 63 healthy individuals17, 28.9 (13.5) in 40 university students8, and 16.2 (11.8) in 20 healthy individuals18. Only a few studies have examined healthy individuals as a non-patient comparison sample; however, these sample sizes were small and did not avoid selection bias. To the best of our knowledge, an epidemiological study has not yet been conducted, and, thus, the rate of a CSI score ≥ 40 in the general population remains unclear. Therefore, we herein investigated the prevalence of CSS using a large-scale general population-based survey.
Results
Descriptive statistics of CSS and each variable
Following the exclusion of participants with missing values, including age and sex (n = 1719) as well as CSI (n = 805), 21,665 were ultimately analyzed in the present study. The effective response rate was 55.3% (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows the characteristics of participants. The average age (SD) of participants was 63.4 yr. (11.7) for all, 66.6 yr. (10.8) for men, and 61.7 yr. (11.8) for women. The rate of depression was the highest among the 10 CSS-related diseases in CSI-B, while none of the participants reported TJD or MCS. In total, 3761 (17.4%) and 1522 (7.0%) participants were missing values on coffee and alcohol intake, respectively.
Cronbach’s coefficient alpha of CSI-A was 0.893 overall, 0.889 for men, and 0.893 for women. Minimum and maximum CSI-A scores ranged between 0 and 87 points. The average CSI-A score (SD) was 15.9 (11.5) in total and was significantly higher in women [17.0 (11.8)] than in men [13.9 (10.6)] (P < 0.001). Among the 4 age groups examined, the average CSI-A score in the 60–79 yr. age group was the lowest (Fig. 2). The prevalence of CSS with a CSI-A score ≥ 40 points in all participants was 4.2% (95% CI 3.9 to 4.4) (Fig. 3). The prevalence of CSS significantly differed between men (2.7%, 95% CI 2.4 to 3.1) and women (4.9%, 95% CI 4.6 to 5.8) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant sex difference was observed between the 40–59 yr. and 60–79 yr. groups.
Relationships between CSS and related factors
CSS with a CSI-A score ≥ 40 points correlated with age groups, CSI-B-related diseases, alcohol intake, exercise habits, sleeping hours per day, perceived stress, and resilience in men and women. In women, smoking and coffee intake correlated with CSS (Table 2).
Age (20–39 yr. and 40–59 yr. vs 60–79 yr.), CSI-B-related diseases (1 or 2 vs 0 disease), sleeping hours per day (≤ 5 h. vs 6–9 h.), perceived stress (high vs low), and resilience (low vs moderate) showed significantly higher crude odds ratio (cOR), while exercise habits (yes vs no) and resilience (high vs moderate) had significantly lower cOR in both men and women. Alcohol intake (> 1 day per week vs non-drinkers) in men and coffee intake (> 1 day per week vs non-drinkers) in women showed significantly lower cOR, and alcohol intake (> 1 day per week vs non-drinkers) and smoking (ex-smokers and smokers vs non-smokers) had significantly higher cOR in women (Table 3).
In the multivariable logistic regression model, CSS showed that the significantly adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95%CI) of having 1 or 2 CSI-B-related diseases was 3.58 (1.76 to 7.29) for men and 3.51 (2.37 to 5.18) for women. Several significant factors were identified. The 80–97 yr. age group 2.07(1.06–4.02) and 2.89 (1.70–4.94), fewer sleeping hours per day 2.18 (1.52–3.13) and 1.98 (1.64–2.38), high perceived stress 5.00 (3.33–7.49) and 4.91 (3.80–6.34), and low resilience 2.94 (2.00–4.33) and 2.71 (2.20–3.36) showed higher aOR, and high resilience 0.45 (0.27–0.75) and 0.66 (0.52–0.84) and exercise habits 0.68 (0.48–0.97) and 0.55 (0.45-0.63) showed lower aOR in men and women, respectively. Furthermore, the 20–39 age group 3.13 (1.07–9.19) in men, 40–59 age group 1.95 (1.59–2.38), and ex-smokers 1.45 (1.12–1.87) in women showed higher aOR, while coffee intake (> 1 day per week) 0.69 (0.54–0.89) in women and alcohol intake (> 1 day per week) 0.56 (0.38–0.81) in men showed lower aOR (Table 3).
Discussion
In the present study, the prevalence of CSS (CSI-A score ≥ 40) in all participants was 4.2% (95% CI 3.9 to 4.4), and was significantly higher in women than in men (4.9% vs 2.7%, P < 0.001). To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report the prevalence of CSS in a general population.
The prevalence of CSS in the present study was 4.2% and differed with sex. The CSI-A Japanese version had higher Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest reliability than the English version: 0.879 and 0.817, and 0.89 and 0.85, respectively8,9. We confirmed that CSI-A in the present study was stable with Cronbach’s alpha for all participants, men, and women of 0.893, 0.889, and 0.893, respectively. Furthermore, the accuracy and specificity of a cut-off CSI-A score of 40 points were 81 and 75%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.8615. The prevalence of CSS in Japanese patients with musculoskeletal disorders was previously reported to be 11%, and the average CSI-A score was 21.9 (SD 13.3)9. These patients with chronic pain had a higher CSS prevalence and mean CSI-A score than our healthy population; the present results showed that the prevalence of CSS was 4.2%, and the mean CSI-A score was 15.9 (11.5) in the general population, which is considered to be appropriate. A previous study reported that the prevalence of CSS was 24.8% in healthy individuals; however, the sample size was very small16. We compared Japanese patients to those in other countries and found a lower mean CSI-A score in the former8,17,18, suggesting the possibility of racial differences.
The present results demonstrated that the prevalence of CSS was higher in healthy women than in men. In patients with musculoskeletal disorders, the prevalence of CSS (CSI-A score ≥ 40) was also higher in women than in men19,20,21. Therefore, sex may be an independent factor in the pathology of CSS.
Although rare CSI-B-related diseases were included in the present study, the main diseases associated with CSS were depression (0.79%), anxiety or panic attacks (0.24%), M/TTH (0.08%), and IBS (0.06%), which is consistent with previous findings showing high CSI-A scores in individuals with more than one CSI-B-related disease9,16.
The pathology of CSS has not yet been elucidated in detail; however, the mechanisms underlying pain hypersensitivity syndrome after peripheral tissue injury have been shown to involve the central sensitization of high-threshold primary afferents and increased spinal excitability1,22,23. The present results also indicated that participants with exercise habits and high resilience have lower CSS. In contrast, participants with high perceived stress, fewer sleeping hours per day, and low resilience have higher CSS.
Smoking has been associated with an increased risk of chronic pain development24. It may dysregulate homeostatic pain processes, producing an allostatic state of pain facilitation25. In the present study, CSS were more prevalent among female ex-smokers, which suggests that they quit smoking due to chronic pain. Due to the low smoking rate in the healthy female population, a relationship was not observed between smoking and CSS. However, this cannot explain the lack of a relationship between smoking and CSS in men. A conceivable reason was the low prevalence of CSS in the healthy male population, which was not associated with smoking, because we previously reported a relationship between CSS and smoking in a patient group26. Another study demonstrated that nicotine exerted temporary analgesic effects27; however, CSS is characterized by chronic pain, and this study found no relationship with CSS in smokers of either sex.
Previous studies also showed that moderate alcohol consumption28 and coffee intake29 alleviated pain regardless of sex. Since these were populations with a low prevalence of CSS, men who consume alcohol at least one day a week and women who drink coffee at least one day a week may mostly be healthy. The frequency of alcohol intake differs between men and women, which may be a contributing factor to the lower prevalence of CSS in men. One potential reason for the lack of a relationship between coffee intake and CSS in men may be due to the strategies used to cope with stress and other CSS-related factors in some men who drink coffee. However, these sex differences remain unclear and warrant further study.
The present results clarified the prevalence of CSS and provided basic data on CSI-A and -B based on sex and age groups in a general population using a large sample size. CSI-A is a useful tool for assessing CSS according to an international consensus. Several limitations need to be addressed. The present study included an information bias and participants may have underestimated CSI-B-related diseases because of the self-reported survey. However, agreement between self-reported CSI-B-related diseases and their diagnoses by physicians was previously reported to be high15, and it is a commonly used method in large-scale epidemiological studies. Furthermore, since this was a cross-sectional study, the causal relationship and sex difference between the prevalence of CSS and significant factors currently remains unclear; therefore, future longitudinal and quantitative studies on smoking, alcohol intake, and coffee consumption are needed. Another limitation is that the average age of Japanese communities is older, with fewer younger men, which needs to be considered when interpreting the present results.
In conclusion, the prevalence of CSS in the present study was 4.2% in the population examined and was higher in women than in men. CSS-related diseases and a few other factors correlated with CSS. The present results provide important information for future epidemiological research on CSS.
Methods
Study design and participants
A large-scale cross-sectional study was performed in Japan in the fiscal year of 2019. During the 11-month study period, we recruited all residents who were eligible for health checkups. They were from Utsunomiya city and Nasu town located approximately 100 and 150 km, respectively, northeast of Tokyo, in Tochigi prefecture. In the present study, a total of 39,152 residents were invited to complete this survey using an anonymous self-reported questionnaire when they underwent annual health check-ups. Written informed consent was provided by residents to participate according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Institutional Review Boards of Dokkyo Medical University approved the study protocol (No: R-7-3). A total of 24,189 out of 39,152 residents (61.8%) agreed to participate in the present study and responded to the questionnaire (Fig. 1).
Questionnaire
Participants were instructed to complete the questionnaire, which included questions on age, sex, smoking (non-smoker, ex-smoker, and smoker), coffee and alcohol intakes (non-drinker, ≤ or > one day per week), exercise habits (walking more than one hr. per day or similar physical activity, yes, no), perceived stress (high or low), sleeping hours per day (≤ 5 h., 6–9 h., and ≥ 10 h.), and resilience (low, moderate, and high). CSS were assessed using the CSI Japanese version, comprising parts A (CSI-A) and B (CSI-B)9. CSI-A addresses 25 items on a 5-point Likert scale for CSS-related somatic symptoms (score, 0–100). Participants with a CSI-A score ≥ 40 were defined as having CSS6,8,9. CSI-B was evaluated according to 10 self-reported CSS-related diseases: RLS, CFS, FM, TJD, M/TTH, IBS, MCS, neck injury (including whiplash), anxiety or panic attacks, and depression.
Statistical analysis
Each variable was described by sex. Age was divided into 4 groups (20–39, 40–59, 60–79, and 80–97 yr.). The reliability of CSI-A in the present study was discussed using Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. The average CSI score (standard deviation) and prevalence of CSS (CSI-A score ≥ 40 points) (95% Confidence interval, 95% CI) were analyzed using descriptive statistics by sex and age groups. The Mann–Whitney test or Kruskal–Wallis test with the Bonferroni post-hoc test was performed to assess differences in CSI scores in the sex or age groups. The 10 diseases in CSI-B were re-categorized as 0 diseases and 1 or 2 diseases. The relationships between CSS and lifestyle and mental factors were examined using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Univariate and multivariable analyses using logistic regression models were performed to identify factors contributing to CSS in the general population. All analyses excluded missing values for each variable.
All statistical analyses were conducted using an assumed type I error rate of 0.05 with SPSS Statistics 26.0 (IBM SPSS, Inc., Tokyo, Japan).
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Change history
23 December 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04281-w
References
Yunus, M. B. Fibromyalgia and overlapping disorders: The unifying concept of central sensitivity syndromes. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 36, 339–356 (2007).
Yunus, M. B. Central sensitivity syndromes: A new paradigm and group nosology for fibromyalgia and overlapping conditions, and the related issue of disease versus illness. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 37, 339–352 (2008).
Kindler, L. L., Bennett, R. M. & Jones, K. D. Central sensitivity syndromes: Mounting pathophysiologic evidence to link fibromyalgia with other common chronic pain disorders. Pain Manag. Nurs. 12, 15–24 (2011).
Walitt, B., Ceko, M., Gracely, J. L. & Gracely, R. H. Neuroimaging of central sensitivity syndromes: Key insights from the scientific literature. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 12, 55–87 (2016).
Yunus, M. B. The prevalence of fibromyalgia in other chronic pain conditions. Pain Res. Treat. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/584573 (2012).
Nijs, J. et al. Applying modern pain neuroscience in clinical practice: Criteria for the classification of central sensitization pain. Pain Physician 17, 447–457 (2014).
Adams, L. M. & Turk, D. C. Psychosocial factors and central sensitivity syndromes. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 11, 96–108 (2015).
Mayer, T. G. et al. The development and psychometric validation of the central sensitization inventory. Pain Pract. 12, 276–285 (2012).
Tanaka, K. T. et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the Central Sensitization Inventory in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. PLoS ONE 12, e0188719 (2017).
Miki, T., Nishigami, T., Takebayashi, T. & Yamauchi, T. Association between central sensitivity syndrome and psychological factors in people with presurgical low back pain: A cross-sectional study. J. Orthop. Sci. S0949–2658(20), 30089 (2020).
Vandyken, B. et al. Pelvic floor muscle tenderness on digital palpation among women: Convergent validity with central sensitization. Braz J Phys Ther. S1413–3555(19), 30455–30461 (2020).
Kim, S. H., Yoon, K. B., Yoon, D. M., Yoo, J. H. & Ahn, K. R. Influence of centrally mediated symptoms on postoperative pain in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A prospective observational evaluation. Pain Pract. 15, E46-53 (2015).
Neblett, R. et al. Use of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) as a treatment outcome measure for patients with chronic spinal pain disorder in a functional restoration program. Spine J. 17, 819–829 (2017).
Beales, D. et al. Characterisation of pain in people with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy. J. Neurol. 264, 2464–2471 (2017).
Neblett, R. et al. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI): Establishing clinically significant values for identifying central sensitivity syndromes in an outpatient chronic pain sample. J. Pain. 14, 438–445 (2013).
Neblett, R., Hartzell, M. M., Mayer, T. G., Cohen, H. & Gatchel, R. J. Establishing clinically relevant severity levels for the central sensitization inventory. Pain Pract. 17, 166–175 (2017).
Caumo, W. et al. The Central Sensitization Inventory validated and adapted for a Brazilian population: Psychometric properties and its relationship with brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J. Pain Res. 10, 2109–2122 (2017).
Aguila, M. R. et al. The association between clinical characteristics of migraine and brain GABA levels: An exploratory study. J. Pain. 17, 1058–1067 (2016).
Bennett, E. E., Walsh, K. M., Thompson, N. R. & Krishnaney, A. A. Central sensitization inventory as a predictor of worse quality of life measures and increased length of stay following spinal fusion. World Neurosurg. 104, 594–600 (2017).
Lluch Girbés, E. et al. Expanded distribution of pain as a sign of central sensitization in individuals with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. 96, 1196–1207 (2016).
Kindler, L. L., Jones, K. D., Perrin, N. & Bennett, R. M. Risk factors predicting the development of widespread pain from chronic back or neck pain. J Pain. 11, 1320–1328 (2010).
Woolf, C. J., Thompson, S. W., & King, A. E. Prolonged primary afferent induced alterations in dorsal horn neurones, an intracellular analysis in vivo and in vitro. J. Physiol. (Paris) 83, 255–266 (1988–1989).
Yunus, M. B. Editorial review: An update on central sensitivity syndromes and the issues of nosology and psychobiology. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 11, 70–85 (2015).
Shiri, R. & Falah-Hassani, K. The effect of smoking on the risk of sciatica: A meta analysis. Am. J. Med. 129, 64–73 (2016).
De Vita, M. J., Maisto, S. A., Ansell, E. B., Zale, E. L. & Ditre, J. W. Pack-years of tobacco cigarette smoking as a predictor of spontaneous pain reporting and experimental pain reactivity. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 27, 552–560 (2019).
Suzuki, K. et al. Central sensitization in migraine is related to restless legs syndrome. J. Neurol. 68, 1395–1401 (2021).
Ditre, J. W., Brandon, T. H., Zale, E. L. & Meagher, M. M. Pain, nicotine, and smoking: Research findings and mechanistic considerations. Psychol. Bull. 137, 1065–1093 (2011).
Scott, J. R. et al. Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with reduced pain and fibromyalgia symptoms in chronic pain patients. Pain Med. 19, 2515–2527 (2018).
Overstreet, D. S., Penn, T. M., Cable, S. T., Aroke, E. N. & Goodin, B. R. Higher habitual dietary caffeine consumption is related to lower experimental pain sensitivity in a community-based sample. Psychopharmacology 235, 3167–3176 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the staff at the Public Health Center of Utsunomiya city and Nasu town, Tochigi Prefecture, for their help with this study. We also thank Mr. Kantaro Nakanishi, Ms. Yuka Imamura, and Masami Tsukahara of the Department of Public Health, Dokkyo Medical University, School of Medicine, for their assistance with managing the survey and preparing the dataset. This work was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Research on Rare and Intractable Diseases Program [Grant Number H29-I-G-061, 20FC1056] in Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.H. and G.K. conceived and designed the study. T.S. and K.U. recruited participants. Y.H. performed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. Y.H., K.S., T.S., K.U., K.H., and G.K. contributed to the interpretation of data and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this Article was revised: The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained an error in Affiliation 2, which was incorrectly labelled as a present address. Modifications have been made to the affiliations. Full information regarding the corrections made can be found in the correction for this Article.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Haruyama, Y., Sairenchi, T., Uchiyama, K. et al. A large-scale population-based epidemiological study on the prevalence of central sensitization syndromes in Japan. Sci Rep 11, 23299 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02678-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02678-1
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.