Identification of obstructive level is crucial for successful surgical outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Unfortunately, most of the dynamic airway evaluations are performed for a short duration under drug-induced sleep; therefore, it is uncertain whether they represent airway events that occur during a whole night of sleep. This study was aimed to evaluate the correlation between obstructive levels that were identified by a short-time and a whole-night test in patients with OSA. Total 101 patients with OSA underwent drug-induced sleep fluoroscopy (DISF) and pressure manometry (PM). For DISF, the obstructive pattern was classified into one of three groups: soft palate, tongue-based, and a combined obstruction. PM was used to measure the proportion of retroglossal events out of total whole-night obstructive events in each patient. The mean age of the patients was 43.8 years. The obstructive pattern was identified as soft palate in 56 patients, combined in 38 patients, and tongue-based in 7 patients following DISF. Results from PM showed that the mean percentage of retroglossal obstructive events was 31.2 ± 30.7%. The average proportion of retroglossal obstructive events that were identified by PM in patients with soft palate, combined, and tongue-based obstruction was 27.2%, 32.1%, and 59.0%, respectively (p = 0.033). There are limitations of evaluating obstructive events that occur during a whole night with short-time tests. Surgeons should be aware the possibility of disagreement in the obstructive level between short-time and whole-night tests.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is caused by partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep. When determining surgical approaches, identification of the obstructive level in the upper airway is crucial for successful surgical outcomes1. Therefore, various localization methods have been introduced to identify the upper airway obstructive level and structures2,3. These methods can be categorized as static or dynamic airway evaluations, short-time or whole-night tests, and drug-induced sleep or natural sleep assessments.
Drug-induced sleep fluoroscopy (DISF)4,5,6 and drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE)7,8 are commonly performed to examine the dynamic changes of the upper airway during short-time sleep induced by midazolam or propofol. These tests are thought to be superior to other tests, such as nasopharyngoscopy or cephalometry, because in drug-induced dynamic sleep tests, the condition of the upper airway is similar to that during actual sleep. However, these examinations are performed over a short period of time; therefore, the information obtained from these dynamic tests may not represent a full night’s sleep, and surgeons can only characterize the obstructive events occurring during this short time period. Some studies using short-time tests, such as DISE, reported that the obstructive levels changed according to sedation depth9,10,11. The authors have previously reported about pressure manometry (PM) results12,13,14. PM is a whole-night test that is performed with an airway pressure sensing probe inside the upper airway and provides information on full-night dynamic obstructive events during natural sleep. In this regard, this study aimed to evaluate the correlation between short-time and whole-night obstructive level tests.
General characteristics of the study patients
A total of 101 patients (90 male patients) were retrospectively reviewed in the study. The mean age, body mass index, and AHI of the patients were 43.8 ± 10.4 years (range, 20–66 years), 26.6 ± 3.4 kg/m2 (range, 20.0–35.8 kg/m2), and 39.7 ± 24.1 per hour (range, 5.6–102.8 per hour), respectively. The percentages of patients with mild, moderate, and severe OSA were 13.9%, 33.7%, and 52.5%, respectively.
Obstructive pattern identified by the short-time obstructive level test
Analysis of obstructive patterns by DISF showed that the prevalence of soft palate, combined, and tongue-based obstructive patterns was 55.4%, 37.6% and 6.9%, respectively. There were no significant differences in sex, BMI, and AHI between the three groups (p = 0.782, 0.465, 0.550, respectively); however, there was a significant difference in age between the three groups (soft palate, 44.0 ± 10.5; combined, 45.1 ± 9.8; tongue-based, 34.6 ± 9.9 years; p = 0.046) (Table 1).
Average proportion of retroglossal obstructive events identified by the full-night obstructive level test
Following evaluation with PM, the average proportion of obstructive events was 31.2 ± 30.7% at the retroglossal site and 68.8 ± 30.7% at the retropalatal site. There were no differences in the proportion of obstructive events according to sex, age, BMI, and AHI (Table 2).
Correlation between short-time and whole-night obstructive level test results
The proportion of retroglossal obstructive events was significantly different between patients with soft palate (27.2 ± 29.1), combined (32.1 ± 31.1), and tongue-based (59.0 ± 30.6) obstructive patterns (p = 0.033) (Fig. 1).
However, the obstructive patterns that were evaluated by DISF, short-time test, poorly correlated with those that were evaluated by PM, whole-night test. Of the 56 patients who had soft palate obstructive pattern with the short-time test, we observed retroglossal obstructive events in 47 of these patients in the whole-night test, and only 9 patients had 100% retropalatal obstructive events in the whole-night test. Of the 7 patients who had tongue-based pattern, only 1 patient had 100% retroglossal obstructive events in the whole-night test, and 59.0% (range, 16–90%) of the obstructive events were observed at the retroglossal site in the other 6 patients (Fig. 1).
Following evaluation with PM, patients with ≥ 50% retroglossal obstruction were defined as the retroglossal obstruction dominant group and patients with < 50% retroglossal obstruction were defined as the non-dominant group. Following evaluation with DISF, 46 of the 56 (82.1%) patients with soft palate obstruction were defined as the retroglossal obstruction non-dominant group, and 5 of the 7 (71.4%) patients with tongue-based obstruction were defined as the retroglossal obstruction dominant group (Fig. 2).
This study demonstrated that obstructive patterns that were evaluated with DISF, a short-time test, correlated poorly with PM, a whole-night test. These findings may indicate that short-time, induced-sleep obstruction tests do not accurately predict whole-night obstructive events.
The evaluation of obstructive levels is important for sleep surgery, and a variety of methods have been used to identify obstructive patterns in the upper airway of patients with OSA1,2,3. The evaluation of obstructive levels by short-time tests during induced-sleep, such as DISE and DISF, have been commonly used in recent years. DISE uses a flexible nasopharyngoscope to visualize the upper airway under sedation15 and classifies obstructive patterns according to the obstructive structure of the velum, oropharynx, tongue base, and epiglottis16. DISF is used to identify dynamic obstructive patterns of the upper airway during drug-induced sleep2,17,18,19,20 and has many advantages. Specifically, DISF is a low cost and quick examination, there is a low risk of radiation exposure, patients are situated in the supine position during evaluation, there is no disruption of sleep during the study, and it allows for the visualization of the whole head and neck, including bony and soft structures and the upper airway4,5,21,22. Based on DISF findings, we have established a classification system that assesses the obstructive sites and patterns as soft palate, combined, and tongue-based obstruction6.
Classification of obstructive sites by DISF or DISE can have a similar limitation in that findings only represent a short time of drug-induced sleep; therefore, the information that is obtained from these dynamic tests does not represent the events of the whole night, and surgeons can only characterize the obstructive events that occur during a short period of evaluation. Previously, several researchers performed whole-night studies to evaluate upper airway obstruction and reported that apneas may result from obstruction at variable sites in a given patient23,24,25. In addition, because upper airway obstruction is usually aggravated during rapid eye movement sleep, which usually appears one hour after sleep onset26, short-time tests are not able to evaluate all of the obstructive patterns that occur during natural sleep.
We have also evaluated obstructive levels during whole nights of natural sleep with PM12. PM is a whole-night test that is performed with an airway pressure sensing probe that is situated inside the upper airway and provides information on whole-night obstructive events. PM can be used to assess the proportion of retropalatal or retroglossal obstructive events out of the total obstructive events during natural sleep in a single patient. In our previous study, approximately one-third of the obstructive events in a single patient were associated with retroglossal collapse, and two-thirds were related to retropalatal collapse12. This clearly demonstrates the limitations of short-time evaluation by DISF or DISE. In this study, the obstructive patterns that were evaluated by DISF, short-time test correlated poorly with the obstructive events that were evaluated by PM, whole-night test. Fifty-six patients were classified as soft palate obstruction group by DISF, among them 47 patients (83.9%) showed retroglossal obstructive events in PM. Only 9 patients showed 100% of retropalatal obstruction in PM. Among 7 patients classified as tongue base obstruction group in DISF, only 1 patient showed 100% of retroglossal obstruction, other showed 16–90% of retroglossal obstruction. Given that the upper airway obstructive pattern can vary over a whole night in each patient, the simple classification of a single patient as an obstructive pattern on the basis of a short-time examination cannot account for the phenomenon occurring throughout the whole night.
Nevertheless, the role of short-time obstructive level tests for diagnostic examinations cannot be devaluated because DISF complements the limitations of PM. DISF showed that 6.9% and 37.6% of patients had tongue-based and combined obstruction, respectively. When using PM, only the lowest obstructive site can be identified; therefore, retropalatal obstruction cannot be identified even if it were to occur simultaneously with retroglossal obstruction12. It is thought that PM and DISF can be used as complementary tests. The authors performed PSG with PM throughout the night and DISF the morning after PSG to evaluate the obstructive levels. These two test results together can be used to determine obstructive levels and surgical extent.
This study has some limitations. First, DISF and PM itself has its own limitations as previously reported4,6,12,13. In addition, PM only evaluates whole-night sleep on a specific day, therefore, there is another debatable point that PM also cannot reflect the potential day-to-day variation of the obstructive pattern. Second, with retrospective nature, this study is limited by using DISF as a short time test, not using DISE, which is considered as standard. However, efficacy of DISF for the evaluation of obstructive pattern was also reported previously. Although there are several limitations of DISF, there is a meaning that this study shows some difference compared to the whole-night test. Further study is needed with the DISE results. Third, although body position has been found to have a definite effect on upper airway collapsibility7,27,28, this study has a limitation that the effect of body position was not taken into account. This is because PM was measured during natural whole-night sleep and includes all body positions such as supine, right lateral, left lateral and prone, whereas DISF was evaluated only in the supine position during drug-induced sleep. Some of the tongue-based obstructive pattern in DISF could be re-categorized into combined obstructive pattern in case that nonsupine body positions were evaluated. However, given that the number of patients having tongue-based obstructive pattern was small, the results might be similar. A further prospective study is needed in the future to identify the body position effect. Fourth, there are potential bias of DISF classification from the sleep surgeon reviewing the DISF videos. However, interrater reliability of DISF analysis for OSA was excellent in previous report29. Finally, we did not use bispectral index monitor to evaluate the level of sedation. Too little sedation may not reproduce the airway obstruction, whereas too much sedation may lead to excessive loss of tone and false positives. Despite those limitations, our study provides novel information about the discrepancy between one of the short-time tests and whole-night tests for patients with OSA.
In conclusion, DISF is a short-time, dynamic obstructive level test, which is less invasive and convenient than whole-night tests. However, there are limitations of evaluating obstructive events that occur during a whole night of natural sleep. Especially, even if there is no tongue-based obstruction in DISF, it does not exclude the possibility of retroglossal obstructive events. Therefore, surgeons should note the possibility of differences in obstructive level findings from short-time sleep studies and whole-night events.
We reviewed the medical records of patients who visited the Sleep Center of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for snoring or sleep apnea and underwent PM during attended in-laboratory full-night polysomnography (PSG) from January 2004 through December 2007. All of the patients underwent DISF to evaluate the obstructive sites of the upper airway on the next morning after PSG. Patients without fully accessible data, with an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) < 5 per hour, body mass index ≥ 40, or a previous history of palatal surgery were excluded from this study. The detailed protocols in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki were approved by the institutional review board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (IRB No. B-1701/380–103) and the need to obtain informed consent was waived.
Drug-induced sleep fluoroscopy
DISF was recorded in the supine position on a C-arm table in the fluoroscopic examination room (Allura Xper FD20; Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) as previously described4,5,6. Briefly, patients were instructed to lay down in the supine position, and midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) was intravenously administrated to induce sleep. An additional 0.02 mg/kg of midazolam was repeatedly administered to maintain sleep. However, the total dosage of midazolam did not exceed 0.1 mg/kg. Oxygen saturation was monitored throughout the examination. Fluoroscopy generated four 15-s video clips that showed the normo-saturation status before and during sleep and the first and second desaturation events after sleep induction (oxygen saturation dropped by more than 4% as measured by a pulse oximeter). The video clips showed a lateral view of the entire upper airway, including the nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx and determined the obstructive sites in the upper airway during desaturation events. All video clips were investigated by single expert sleep surgeon who classified the upper airway obstructive pattern into three groups: 1) soft palate, 2) tongue-based, and 3) a combination of soft palate and tongue-based obstruction (i.e., combined obstruction group) as described in a previous study6.
The PM, which is a type of catheter manometry with multiple pressure sensors, was composed of a flexible catheter with a 2.7-mm diameter (Gaeltec Ltd., Isle of Skye, Scotland) and four transducers that measured the surrounding pressure. Details of the placement and interpretation of PM have been described previously12,13,14. The catheter was inserted through a nostril and its position in the upper airway was confirmed by lateral radiography. The four pressure sensors on the catheter were located at the mid-esophagus, tip of the epiglottis, tip of the uvula, and nasopharynx. After placement of the PM, patients underwent laboratory level 1 PSG, and the pharyngeal pressures were recorded and presented as additional channels of the PSG as previously described12,13,14. The patterns in the pressure sensors determined the obstructive sites (i.e., retropalatal or retroglossal obstructions) of the upper airway during respiratory distress events. The PM produced sinusoidal waves in all four sensors in patients without airway obstruction; however, flat waves were observed in the nasopharyngeal sensor and sinusoidal waves were observed in the remaining three sensors in patients with retropalatal obstruction. Further, flat waves were observed in the uvular and nasopharyngeal sensors and sinusoidal waves were observed in the epiglottis and mid-esophagus sensors in patients with retroglossal obstruction. The retropalatal and retroglossal obstruction at obstructive respiratory distress events were counted, and the proportion of retroglossal and retropalatal obstructive events out of the total obstructive events was calculated for each patient.
The full-night PSG was performed using an Embla N 7000 (Embla; Medcare Reykjavik, Iceland) with standard electrodes and sensors under the supervision of an experienced technician, as previously described21,22. The Full-night PSG was used to measure the occurrence of apnea, which was defined as the complete cessation of airflow for at least 10 s; hypopnea, which was defined as a substantial reduction in airflow (> 50%) for at least 10 s or a moderate reduction in airflow for at least 10 s associated with arousals or oxygen desaturation (≥ 4%)30; and AHI, which was defined as the total number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep.
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 18.0 for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY). Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Student’s t-tests and one-way analyses of variance with Bonferroni correction with post-hoc analysis were conducted to compare the average proportion of retroglossal obstruction that was evaluated using PM between the obstruction groups (i.e., soft palate, tongue-based, and combined obstruction) that were identified using DISF.
All the data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are included in this article and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Woodson, B. T. Diagnosing the correct site of obstruction in newly diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 140, 565–567 (2014).
Rama, A. N., Tekwani, S. H. & Kushida, C. A. Sites of obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 122, 1139–1147 (2002).
Faber, C. E. & Grymer, L. Available techniques for objective assessment of upper airway narrowing in snoring and sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 7, 77–86 (2003).
Lee, C. H. et al. Evaluation of soft palate changes using sleep videofluoroscopy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 135, 168–172 (2009).
Lee, C. H. et al. Mouth opening during sleep may be a critical predictor of surgical outcome after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 6, 157–162 (2010).
Lee, C. H., Hong, S. L., Rhee, C. S., Kim, S. W. & Kim, J. W. Analysis of upper airway obstruction by sleep videofluoroscopy in obstructive sleep apnea: A large population-based study. Laryngoscope. 122, 237–241 (2012).
Lee, C. H., Kim, D. K., Kim, S. Y., Rhee, C. S. & Won, T. B. Changes in site of obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea patients according to sleep position: A DISE study. Laryngoscope. 125, 248–254 (2015).
Chong, K. B., De Vito, A. & Vicini, C. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy in treatment options selection. Sleep Med. Clin. 14, 33–40 (2019).
Hong, S. D. et al. Change of obstruction level during drug-induced sleep endoscopy according to sedation depth in obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 123, 2896–2899 (2013).
Altintaş, A. et al. Interobserver consistency of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea using a VOTE classification system. J. Craniofac. Surg. 29, e140–e143 (2018).
Vroegop, A. V. et al. Observer variation in drug-induced sleep endoscopy: Experienced versus nonexperienced ear, nose, and throat surgeons. Sleep 36, 947–953 (2013).
Jung, H. J., Wee, J. H., Rhee, C. S. & Kim, J. W. Full-night measurement of level of obstruction in sleep apnea utilizing continuous manometry. Laryngoscope. 127, 2897–2902 (2017).
Kim, J. W. et al. Comparison between tongue base and soft palate obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea. Acta Otolaryngol. 129, 855–861 (2009).
Lee, C. H. et al. Obstructive site localization using multisensor manometry versus the Friedman staging system in obstructive sleep apnea. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 265, 171–177 (2008).
Croft, C. B. & Pringle, M. Sleep nasendoscopy: A technique of assessment in snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea. Clin. Otolaryngol. Allied Sci. 16, 504–509 (1991).
Kezirian, E. J., Hohenhorst, W. & de Vries, N. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy: The VOTE classification. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 268, 1233–1236 (2011).
Suratt, P. M., Dee, P., Atkinson, R. L., Armstrong, P. & Wilhoit, S. C. Fluoroscopic and computed tomographic features of the pharyngeal airway in obstructive sleep apnea. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 127, 487–492 (1983).
Walsh, J. K., Katsantonis, G. P., Schweitzer, P. K., Verde, J. N. & Muehlbach, M. Somnofluoroscopy: Cineradiographic observation of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 8, 294–297 (1985).
Pepin, J. L. et al. Somnofluoroscopy, computed tomography, and cephalometry in the assessment of the airway in obstructive sleep apnoea. Thorax 47, 150–156 (1992).
Hillarp, B., Nylander, G., Rosen, I. & Wickstrom, O. Videoradiography of patients with habitual snoring and/or sleep apnea: technical description and presentation of videoradiographic results during sleep concerning occurrence of apnea, type of apnea, and site of obstruction. Acta Radiol. 37, 307–314 (1996).
Lee, C. H. et al. An investigation of upper airway changes associated with mandibular advancement device using sleep videofluoroscopy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 135, 910–914 (2009).
Lee, C. H. et al. Determinants of treatment outcome after use of the mandibular advancement device in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 136, 667–681 (2010).
Tvinnereim, M. & Miljeteig, H. Pressure recordings–A method for detecting site of upper airway obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 492, 132–140 (1992).
Skatvedt, O. Localization of site of obstruction in snorers and patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a comparison of fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy and pressure measurements. Acta Otolaryngol. 113, 206–209 (1993).
Boudewyns, A. N., Van de Heyning, P. H. & De Backer, W. A. Site of upper airway obstruction in obstructive sleep apnoea and influence of sleep stage. Eur. Respir. J. 10, 2566–2572 (1997).
Kim, S. H. et al. Does rapid eye movement sleep aggravate obstructive sleep apnea?. Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol. 12, 190–195 (2019).
Kim, W. Y. et al. The effect of body position on airway patency in obstructive sleep apnea: CT imaging analysis. Sleep Breath. 23, 911–916 (2019).
Yalamanchili, R., Mack, W. J. & Kezirian, E. J. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy findings in supine vs nonsupine body positions in positional and nonpositional obstructive sleep apnea. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 145, 159–165 (2019).
Kim, D. K., Lee, W. H., Lee, C. H., Rhee, C. S. & Kim, J. W. Interrater reliability of sleep videofluoroscopy for airway obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 124, 1267–1271 (2014).
American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force. Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force. Sleep. 22, 667–689 (1999).
First author (Kim, J.W.) and second author (Ahn, J.C.) contributed equally to this work. This work was partly supported by SNUBH gant #14-2020-041.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, JW., Ahn, JC., Choi, YS. et al. Correlation between short-time and whole-night obstruction level tests for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sci Rep 11, 1509 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80825-w
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.