Biology is adapted to Earth’s gravity force, and the long-term effects of varying gravity on the development of animals is unclear. Previously, we reported that high gravity, called hypergravity, increases defects in the development of motor neuron axons in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Here, we show that a mutation in the unc-70 gene that encodes the cytoskeletal β-spectrin protein suppresses hypergravity-induced axon defects. UNC-70 expression is required in both muscle and epidermis to promote the axon defects in high gravity. We reveal that the location of axon defects is correlated to the size of the muscle cell that the axon traverses. We also show that mutations that compromise key proteins of hemidesmosomal structures suppress hypergravity-induced axon defects. These hemidesmosomal structures play a crucial role in coupling mechanical force between the muscle, epidermis and the external cuticle. We speculate a model in which the rigid organization of muscle, epidermal and cuticular layers under high gravity pressure compresses the narrow axon migration pathways in the extracellular matrix hindering proper axon pathfinding of motor neurons.
Organisms and biological systems constantly adapt to and evolve with their changing environments. However, earth’s gravity is a static environmental parameter that remains unchanged through time. Thus, biological processes on earth are not adapted to conditions of space gravity, called microgravity, or high gravity, called hypergravity. Studying the effects of gravity on health and basic biology is a challenge due to the difficulty in altering gravity force, but a clearer understanding of how microgravity and hypergravity can alter the body will be necessary as space travel and habitation become more frequent in the near future. True microgravity conditions can be only experienced in spaceflight. Observations of astronauts, as well as biological experiments during spaceflight have shown that muscle and bone mass decrease in microgravity conditions1,2. In human twin studies, long-term space habitation resulted in specific gene expression changes that in some cases appear to be permanent3. Studying the effects of microgravity on neurons and the nervous system development is even more challenging. Studies in microgravity have shown small differences in cerebellar cortex and vestibular system neuron structure in rats4,5. However larger scale nervous systems experiments have not occurred, and questions of gravity’s effect on neuron development remain obscure.
The effects of hypergravity on some aspects of nervous system and brain structure has also been evaluated. In vertebrates including fish, frogs and rats, hypergravity induces a reduction and slowing of brain development6,7,8,9, and a reduction in the number of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum10. In addition, hypergravity exposure in embryonic rats altered the development of the axons of vestibular neurons11. How hypergravity alters genetic and cellular environments to cause such changes in the nervous system is not known. Studies suggest that changes in the expression levels of proteins involved with cell–cell interactions such as CD15 and NCAM-L1 may be correlated with hypergravity-induced changes in the brain9,12. However, to determine causality of hypergravity-induced changes in the nervous system, genetic experiments should be conducted.
The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has been a valuable tool to study the effects of altered gravity at the genetic level. Studies of C. elegans in space have verified that microgravity lowers the expression of muscle development transcription factors to decrease muscle development13, alters TGF-β expression to decrease growth of body length14,15 and alters fat-related genes and results in decreased accumulation of fat15. 100G hypergravity treatment in C. elegans does not alter overall muscle integrity but causes nuclear accumulation of the DAF-16 FOXO transcription factor, a conserved stress-response protein16. In addition, worms exposed to hypergravity for 12 h in liquid culture had slightly delayed adaptive locomotory responses after treatment17.
The DD/VD GABAergic motor neurons control forward and backward movement in C. elegans18,19. DD neuron axon outgrowth begins in the embryonic stage from cell bodies on the ventral side of the animal and cross the body circumferentially along the body wall to the dorsal side20,21. VD neuron axon outgrowth occurs similarly during the L1 larval stage to complete the development of the 19 DD/VD motor neurons. Previously, we showed that hypergravity exposure of at least 10G increases defects in axon development in the DD/VD motor neurons in C. elegans22. Hypergravity during the L1 larval stage before the VD axons are even born was sufficient to cause an increase in defects, and the increase was consistently observed in all DD/VD axons.
We sought to identify the root cause of hypergravity’s effect on DD/VD axon development. Here, we show that a mutant of unc-70 that encodes the cytoskeletal protein UNC-70 β-spectrin suppresses hypergravity-induced axon defects. Although β-spectrin protein is known to play roles in the structure of both neurons and muscle, and we find that muscle size is correlated with DD/VD axon defects, our results show that UNC-70 expression in both the epidermis and muscle together promotes hypergravity-induced axon defects. This is supported by genetic analysis of molecules expressed in muscle, ECM, epidermis and the cuticle. Our results promote a model in which proteins that support the proper layered structure of muscle, epidermis and cuticle can become a hindrance in a high gravity force environment.
Materials and methods
C. elegans culture and strains
C. elegans were grown on Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) plates seeded with E.coli OP50 and maintained at 20 °C as described23,24. Strains used in the experiments were obtained from the CGC and are listed: N2 Bristol strain, LG I: vab-10(e698), erm-1(tm677), unc-54(s74). LG II: vab-19(e1036), unc-52(e1421), rol-6(su1006), juIs76 [Punc-25::gfp]. LG IV: unc-129(ev557). LG V: sma-1(ru18), unc-70(e524). LG X: mec-4(e1334), mig-15(rh148) and lon-2(n1630). For regular genetic maintenance, the juIs76 strain was outcrossed with N2. In order to visualize the DD/VD axon development in the mutant strains above, we crossed the juIs76 [Punc-25::gfp] strain into the background of single mutants following conventional crossing and screening methods.
Hypergravity cultivation chamber was prepared as previously described22. For hypergravity experiment, eggs were collected from gravid adult animals by bleaching using standard procedures25 and then transferred into the cultivation tube around 100–150 in number. Developing embryos were exposed to 100G hypergravity by setting a temperature-controlled Sorval Legend Micro 17R centrifuge system to 1200 RPM for 60 h at 20 °C similar to previous protocols22. Control tubes (1G condition) were maintained in an incubator at 20 °C.
Axonal defect analysis
After 60 h, worms were collected from the cultivation tube by washing in M9 buffer and were mounted on a 2% agarose pad in 2 µl of 1 M sodium azide to immobilize the worms. An epi-fluorescent microscope (Olympus BX50) was used to observe the DD/VD axons. Axons that do not reach the dorsal nerve cord were considered as a defective axon. In each experiment 100–130 animals were used. For wild-type N2, juIs76 strain pre-outcrossed and post-outcrossed data were included since differences in axon defects were negligible. Differences between 1 and 100G exposed worms regarding the axonal defects were evaluated by student’s T-test using Excel software (Microsoft, USA). Change in percent defective axons was measured by subtracting percent defects at 100G and 1G for each paired trial, and the differences from each trial were averaged together. Student’s T-test was performed to assess the statistical difference between the change in percent defective axons of N2 and each strain using Excel software (Microsoft, USA).
Double whole-mount antibody staining of DD/VD axons and muscle cells
Previously described antibody staining of DD/VD axons26,27 was modified and performed in the following manner. L4/young adult hermaphrodites for both control and hypergravity-treated samples were mounted and fixed for 1 h at 4 °C in 4% paraformaldehyde/2.5% glutaraldehyde fixative in 1X PBS. To enhance permeation of fixative, samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and thawed at 70 °C. Before the samples completely melted, we placed them on ice. After fixation, mounted worms were washed thrice in 1X PBS/0.5% Triton X-100 and rocked gently for 18 h at 37 °C in a solution of 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 1% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M Tris–HCl (pH 7.5). The worms were washed four times in 1% Triton X-100/0.1 M Tris–HCl (pH7.5). To quench the autofluorescence caused by glutaraldehyde, the worms were incubated for one hour at 4 °C in a freshly made solution of 1 mg/mL of borate buffer (NaBH4, Sigma, 71321) in 1X PBS, with gentle mixing periodically by tapping the bottom of tube. To enhance permeation samples were moved to room temperature and back to ice every 10 min. The worms were then washed twice in PBS buffer. Sample was incubated in 200 µl of 10 mM DTT/ borate buffer (1 mg/ml) for 15 min at room temperature then washed in approximately 200 µl of 1X PBS buffer twice. The sample was incubated in 200 µl 0.3% H2O2/ borate buffer (1 mg/ml) for 15 min at room temperature then washed in approximately 200 µl PBS buffer three times. Blocking was performed with freshly prepared 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and then washed in approximately 200 µl PBS buffer three times. For labelling the DD/VD axons, anti-GFP, chicken antibody (Invitrogen, A10262) was used as a primary antibody at 1:1000 dilution in 1X PBS and incubated at room temperature overnight. Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit antibody (Invitrogen, 2051237) was used as a secondary antibody at 1:1000 dilution in 1X PBS and incubated for 8 h at room temperature. The samples were washed with 200 µl of 1X PBS. Actin filaments of muscle cells were stained using Phalloidin conjugated Alexa-488 antibody (Invitrogen, A12379) at 1:1000 dilution in 1X PBS and incubated at room temperature for 6 h. Although using different fluorophores in double staining is standard, we decided to use Alexa-488 for both neuron and muscle staining for convenience during microscopic analysis as the two tissue types were easily distinguishable. The samples were washed in PBS once and mounted on 2% agarose pads on a glass slide. A 40× oil objective lens of an epi-fluorescent microscope (Olympus BX20) was used to visualize and photograph the DD/VD axons and muscle cells using CellSens Standard software.
Measurement of longitudinal area of muscle cells
Images of individual muscle cells were taken using a 40× lens near to the middle of the muscle cells. The outline of muscle cells were traced using the polygon tool in the ImageJ software, and the longitudinal area of the muscle cell was calculated by the software. Student’s T-test was performed to assess the statistical difference between the control and hypergravity samples using Excel software (Microsoft, USA).
To compare axon defects and the dorsal lateral muscle cell each axon traverses, muscle cells were organized into arbitrary regions called R1–R12 (Fig. 4). As there is some animal to animal variability in the muscle that each axon traverses, there is some variability in the muscles that are represented in each region from animal to animal. R1 is defined by muscle 8, (muscle identities as previously defined20) which DD2/VD3/VD4 axons pass through. Similarly R2 represents muscle 10 which VD5 traverses, R3 represents muscles 10 or 12, depending on which muscle DD3 traverses, R4 represents muscle 10 or 12 depending on which muscle VD6 traverses, R5 represents muscle 12 or 14 depending on which muscle VD7 traverses, R6 represents muscle 14 which DD4/VD8 traverses, R7 represents muscle 16 which VD9 traverses, R8 represents muscle 18 which DD5/ VD10 traverses, R9 represents muscle 20 which VD11 traverses, R10 represents muscles 20 or 22 depending on which muscle VD12 traverses, R11 represents muscles 20 or 22 depending on which muscle DD6 traverses, and R12 which represent muscles 22 or 24 depending on which muscle VD13 traverses. Longitudinal area of muscle for each region is the average cross-sectional muscle area in a given region for all animals. R2 value was determined by regression analysis using Microsoft Excel.
Measurement of body length
To measure the body length of the worms, gravid adult worms were incubated in bleach solution25, and eggs were transferred to a culture plate containing M9 buffer. Eggs hatched within 10–12 h and place onto a standard NGM plate. After 2 h and 18 h the larvae were picked and mounted on a 2% agarose pad, then anaethetisized with 1 M sodium azide. Immobilized worms were photographed with an Olympus BX20 microscope. Body length of the larvae were measured from nose to tip of the tail using ImageJ software28.
Transgenic rescue experiments
Microinjection was performed to express unc-70 cDNA in unc-70(e524); juIs76 background. The translational fusion constructs Ppdi-2::UNC-70 (epidermal) and Pmyo-3::UNC-70 (muscle)29,30 were injected into the young adults of unc-70(e524); juIs76 strain animals using 40 ng/ul of punc-122::RFP as a co-injection marker to express UNC-70 in muscle and hypodermis. To investigate whether simultaneous expression of UNC-70 in muscle and hypodermis are required for hypergravity induced axon defects, a 1:1 ratio of Ppdi-2::unc-70 and Pmyo-3::unc-70 constructs were injected into unc70(e524);juIs76 strain animals. Stable transgenic lines were obtained at the F2 generation and maintained.
Mutations in UNC-70 β-spectrin suppress hypergravity-induced axon defects (HIAD)
Previously, we showed that hypergravity exposure increases DD/VD motor neuron axon defects22. Here, we sought to explain how gravity force can alter the axon development in the worm. It is well established that axon outgrowth and guidance mechanisms allow the axon to reach proper targets. To identify novel factors during early larval development that may contribute to hypergravity-induced axon defects (HIAD), we conducted a candidate genetic screen to find mutations that may exacerbate or suppress HIAD. We measured HIAD by the increase in DD/VD axon defects observed between 1 and 100G in each mutant, and then compared the change in the proportion of axon defects in hypergravity for N2 wild type with each mutant strain (Fig. 1).
To examine whether HIAD is due to neuronal factors, we tested mutants of axon outgrowth and axon guidance. Although most of these mutants already display severe axon defects, we tested HIAD in mutant strains with milder axon phenotypes. mig-15 encodes serine/threonine kinase protein and erm-1 encodes an ezrin/radzin/moesin protein, both of which promote growth cone migration of DD/VD axons on encountering longitudinal obstacles31. When we subjected mutants of mig-15(rh148) and erm-1(tm677) to 100G, there was an increase in defects similar to N2 wild type (Fig. 1A, B, E, F, I; Fig S1). mig-15 mutants started at a higher basal error rate than N2 or erm-1, but the increase in error was additive, not synergistic, indicating the mutation does not further exacerbate the axon defect in high gravity (Fig. 1B, F, I). While the increase in axon defects in erm-1 mutants was significant, the increase observed in mig-15 mutants was not statistically significant due to a high variation in basal error rate (Fig. 1I; Fig S1). When we compared the increases in axon defects for each trial in mig-15 mutants and wild type, we found that both strains showed a modest but consistent 4% increase in defects (Fig. 1J). In erm-1 mutants, the increase in defects was slightly diminished at around 2% (Fig. 1J). To further analyze HIAD, we also calculated the proportion of animals with DD/VD axon defects (Fig. S2). We found that hypergravity significantly increases the portion of erm-1 mutants with at least one axon defect, but this type of analysis was not useful to assess HIAD in mig-15 mutants since nearly all the mig-15 mutants had axon defects at 1G gravity. Taken together, we do not find a large deviation in HIAD between axon outgrowth mutants and the wild-type strain.
unc-129 encodes a BMP-like TGF-β protein that is secreted by the dorsal body-wall muscle and acts on the dorsal side of the worm during axon migration to increase sensitivity to distant UNC-6/netrin guidance cues32. Similar to axon outgrowth mutants, HIAD occurs additively rather than synergistically in 100G in unc-129(ev557) mutants (Fig. 1C, G, I, J; Fig S1). The increase in defects in unc-129 mutants is similar to N2 (Fig. 1J) confirming that the defect is not due to the alteration in DD/VD neuron guidance cues.
A previous study using C. elegans showed that hypergravity-dependent nuclear translocation of DAF-16 transcription factor required the mec-4 gene16. The mec-4 gene encodes the degenerin channel involved in touch sensation33. The study suggested that the MEC-4 channel could be involved in gravity sensation. However, mec-4(e1334) mutants showed completely normal HIAD similar to wild-type animals (Fig. 1I, J; Fig S1; Fig S2). Overall, disruption of axon outgrowth and migration or lack of touch sensation does not appear to affect HIAD.
We next asked whether HIAD is due to axonal damage. Previous studies have shown that if DD/VD motor neuron axons become damaged, axon regeneration mechanisms can repair the broken axons34. Mutants of the unc-70 gene that encodes the cytoskeletal protein β-spectrin result in fragile DD/VD neuron axons leading to increased damaged axons29. We reasoned that if HIAD is the result of axonal damage during hypergravity, we should observe an even higher incidence of defects in unc-70 mutants, due to the fragile axons. Surprisingly, we found that HIAD was not enhanced but actually suppressed in unc-70(e524) mutants (Fig. 1D, H, I, J; Fig S1, Fig S2).
Muscle and epidermal expression of UNC-70 are important for HIAD
Our results showing that unc-70 mutants suppress HIAD rather than exacerbate axon defects suggested that UNC-70 was acting in a role separate from its neuronal function. This was consistent with the fact that HIAD requires hypergravity exposure from the embryonic stage up to the end of the L1 larval stage, which is before the VD neurons are even born22. In light of this, the fact that hypergravity does not act on multiple neuronal mechanisms such as axon outgrowth, axon guidance and touch sensation was not surprising.
Besides neurons, UNC-70 is also expressed in the body-wall muscle and epidermis35,36. To address whether UNC-70 functions in these tissues to promote HIAD, we used cell-specific promoters to restore UNC-70 function in the muscle or the epidermis. When unc-70 was restored in only muscle or only epidermis, we still observed a suppression of hypergravity-induced axon defects (Fig. 2A, B). Thus, muscle or epidermal unc-70 alone was not sufficient to restore normal HIAD. However, when unc-70 was restored in both muscle and hypodermis simultaneously, we were able to once again observe hypergravity-induced axon defects similar to N2 (Fig. 2A, B). Thus, both muscle and epidermal expression of UNC-70 is required for HIAD.
DD/VD neuron axon defects occur at the juncture with the dorsal lateral muscle
How could both the muscle and epidermal tissue be responsible for the axon defects observed in hypergravity? An earlier study provided a clue: the authors of this study showed that during axon development, the VD axon growth cones quickly move circumferentially towards the dorsal side until it reaches the juncture with the lateral-most end of the dorsal muscle37. At this point the VD growth cone stalls for 4 h, collapses and re-forms, then slowly navigates through the narrow basal lamina/ECM between the muscle and epidermis towards the dorsal nerve cord37. This delay in VD axon migration is thought to be due to (1) the muscle acting as a physical barrier to migration, and (2) the presence of dense fibrous organelles (FOs) in the basal lamina/ECM between the muscle and epidermis. FOs are hemidesmosomal-like structures originating from the epidermal cells that densely line the space between the muscle and epidermis37,38,39. UNC-70 in the epidermis is known to maintain the stability of FO structures that connect muscle with the epidermis40. In the muscle cells UNC-70 localizes to membrane attachment sites of the myofilament apparatus and is important for proper muscle structure and organization35,36.
The results from the above study was in agreement with our previous observation that most of the DD/VD axon errors occurred at the dorsal side of the worm22. In addition, almost all axons errors resulted in the axon stopping, branching or turning at a specific point along the circumferential axis of the worm22. We wondered if the location of this specific point was at the lateral-most juncture with the dorsal body wall muscle. When we visualized DD/VD axons and the body-wall muscle simultaneously, we immediately noticed a distinct pattern of defects and were able to categorize them into two groups: axon errors occurring at the most lateral juncture with the muscle (Fig. 3A), and errors occurring in the body of the muscle (Fig. 3B). We found that regardless of gravity condition (1G or 100G), most of the defects occur at the most lateral edge of the dorsal muscle rather than in the center of the muscle or more medial dorsal muscle cells (Fig. 3C). This suggests that the dorsal lateral muscle acts as a physical impediment that needs to be overcome for correct axonal pathfinding.
Incidence of axon defects are correlated with large muscle cells
Previously, we showed that wild-type worms in normal 1G gravity occasionally display DD/VD axon defects22. Interestingly, there is a pattern of axon defect distribution in which some of the axons along the anterior–posterior axis consistently show a higher incidence of defects than others. It is unknown, however, what causes the differences in error rates for each DD/VD axon. In light of the evidence that VD axon pathfinding is challenged physically by the narrow basal lamina/ECM space between the muscle and epidermis37, we wondered whether there was a relationship between incidence of defects for a given axon and the size of the muscle cell that each axon needs to traverse on the dorsal side.
The adult C. elegans contains 95 rhomboid-shaped body wall muscle cells arranged in four longitudinal bundles, two dorsally and two ventrally, across the long axis of the worm19. Each muscle bundle contains 23 or 24 muscle cells, arranged in a medial row and a lateral row of cells. By the time of hatching, 81 of these muscle cells are already formed, and 14 more develop by the L1 larval stage, well before most of the DD/VD axons begin to form41,42. 16 of the DD/VD axons traverse around the left dorsal lateral muscle in a stereotyped pattern and location, albeit with some variation. As shown on Fig. 4A, B, we identified each dorsal lateral muscle, previously classified as muscle 8 to muscle 2420, that the 16 DD/VD neurons traverse. We found that 10 of the DD/VD axons always traverse the same muscle. For instance, the axons of the anterior neurons VD3, DD2 and VD4 always cross muscle 8 (Fig. 4B). On the other hand, 6 of the axons traverse either one muscle or the neighboring muscle. This is observed in the DD3 axon which can traverse either muscle 10 or muscle 12 (Fig. 4B). Next, we measured the longitudinal area of the dorsal lateral muscle cells in normal 1G conditions and found large differences in the size of muscle cells. We found that the area of muscle cells varies from 191 µm2 in muscle 22–347 µm2 in muscle 12, an 82% increase in size (Fig. 4C; Fig S2).
We asked if there was a relationship between muscle cell size and the frequency of axon errors observed in normal 1G gravity conditions. In order to analyze this, we first divided the areas where axons traversed the muscle into 12 regions called R1–R12 (Fig. 4B). R1 is the anterior-most region where the neurons VD3, VD4 and DD2 traverse through (Fig. 4A, B). R2, R3, R4, R5, R7, R9, R10, R11, R12 represent the regions of muscle where VD5, DD3, VD6, VD7, VD9, VD11, VD12, DD6, and VD13 neurons pass respectively, and R6 and R8 regions represent muscle area where axons of DD4-VD8 and DD5-VD10 traverse (Fig. 4A, B). To determine the frequency of axon defects, we used previously published data from our group showing the rate of axon defects for each DD/VD axon22. In the regions in which multiple axons traverse through, we calculated the average rate of defects.
Muscle size tended to be thicker in the anterior half of the worm at around 340 µm2. Midway through the length of the worm, there was a precipitous dip in cell size, followed by a slight increase, then a decrease again at the posterior side. The rate of axon defects generally followed a similar pattern, but the correlation was especially evident along the middle of the worm: where there was a precipitous decline in the size of muscle, axon defects also decreased. When muscle size was bigger in the next region, there was a coincident increase in the rate of axon defects, which decreased again as the muscle size became smaller in the following region. From this, we saw a clear correlation (R2 = 0.81) between the two plotted curves. This indicates that the incidence of axon errors is correlated to the size of the muscle cell that the axon traverses on the dorsal side.
Taken together, our data show that dorsal lateral muscles may act as a physical barrier for axons to reach the dorsal nerve cord, and that natural errors found in normal gravity conditions in our previous study as well as others43,44 may be due in large part to size of the muscle cell at the location of crossover independent of gravity conditions.
Hypergravity decreases the size of muscle cells while increasing the incidence of axon defects
Since muscle size correlates with axonal defects, we wondered whether HIAD occurred due to an increase in muscle size in hypergravity. However, worms grown in 100G actually had slightly decreased muscle cell size (Fig. 5A, B, E). In addition, labeling muscle fibers with fluorescent-conjugated phalloidin did not reveal any obvious changes in muscle cell shape or actin organization in hypergravity (Fig. 5A, B). We concluded that, while muscle cell size and shape are correlated with axon defects in the 1G condition, other factors may contribute to hypergravity-induced axon defects.
We also looked at the muscle of unc-70 mutants to see if there were any associated changes. UNC-70 localizes to the membrane attachment sites of the sarcomere at the sarcolemma, and null mutants or RNAi of unc-70 result in animals with compromised sarcomere and sarcolemma structure35,36. In the unc-70(e524) hypomorph, we saw only subtle defects in actin organization at 1G normal gravity (Fig. 5A–D, F, G), and observed a 12.7% decrease in muscle cell area in the mutants (Fig. 5E). In 100G hypergravity, unc-70 mutants displayed subtle defects in actin organization similar to 1G (data not shown), but we did not observe a further decrease in muscle cell longitudinal area as observed in the wild-type animals in hypergravity. This suggests that the suppression of HIAD in unc-70 mutants is not due to changes in muscle cell size.
Genes important for muscle-epidermal connections promote HIAD
As previously mentioned, VD axons must pass through the narrow basal lamina between the muscle and epidermis towards the dorsal nerve cord37. The extracellular landscape that they travel through consists of dense fibrous organelles scattered throughout the basal lamina/ECM. FOs play a major role in transmitting tension between the body wall muscle and the cuticle during movement38,39. In the absence of a bony skeleton, these connections from inner to outer layers allow the muscle to control the undulating movement of the worm. Actin and myosin muscle filaments attach to proteins in the membrane that then associate with the FOs in the ECM (Fig. 7). UNC-70 essentially acts both in the epidermis and muscles to strengthen this connection on either end35,40. Since unc-70 expression in both muscle and epidermis promotes HIAD (Fig. 2), we hypothesized that suppression of HIAD in unc-70 mutants could be explained by loosening of these dense connections that may impede the pathway of axons.
To test whether FOs are involved in inducing HIAD, we tested mutants of genes that are involved in promoting the structural integrity of FOs. Since FOs are a part of a network of connections originating from the muscle to the cuticle, we wondered whether defects in sarcomere organization in the muscle compromises these connections, suppressing HIAD. To test this hypothesis, we examined mutants of the unc-54 gene, which encodes myosin heavy chain in skeletal muscles. Disruption of unc-54 results in severe defects in muscle structure45. We found that HIAD was suppressed in unc-54(s74) mutants similar to unc-70 mutants (Fig. 6, Fig S1, Fig S2).
Next, we tested sma-1, a β-H-spectrin expressed in the epidermis related to UNC-70 β-G-spectrin. SMA-1 is known to interact with components of fibrous organelles, presumably to attach FOs to the actin cytoskeleton of the epidermis39,46. Interestingly, sma-1(ru18) mutants also showed suppression of HIAD (Fig. 6, Fig S1, Fig S2).
In addition to sma-1, we investigated the role of other proteins important to FOs and muscle-epidermis-cuticle connections. VAB-10 encodes a spectraplakin protein, and the VAB-10A isoform plectin protein associates with FO structures at the apical and basal sides of epidermal cells physically holding muscle, epidermal and cuticular tissues together during muscle contraction forces47,48. VAB-19, the ortholog of ankyrin repeat protein KANK1 expressed in the epidermis, is also associated with FOs through VAB-1046. UNC-52/Perlecan is a protein localized in the ECM between muscle and epidermis49,50, critically linking the two tissues through FOs (Fig. 7). ROL-6 is a collagen protein found in the cuticle. It is expressed in the epidermis, secreted on the apical side and crucial to the proper formation of the collagen-based cuticle51. Consistent with our hypothesis, hypergravity could not induce axon defects in vab-10(e698), vab-19(e1036), unc-52(e1421), and rol-6(su1006) mutants (Fig. 6A), could not increase the proportion of worms with axons of defects (Fig S2), and was significantly different compared to N2 wild type for 3 of the 4 mutant strains (Fig. 6B). Thus, disruption of the muscle-epidermis-cuticle connections allows DD/VD axon pathfinding in hypergravity. Taken together, we find that structural proteins that normally hold muscle, epidermal and cuticle tissue layers together can hinder axon migration in an altered gravity environment.
A model for how hypergravity force promotes DD/VD motor neuron axon defects
Previously, we showed that hypergravity exposure increases DD/VD motor neuron axon defects22. Here, we sought to explain how gravity force can alter the axon development in the worm. Using a candidate genetic screen approach, we identified genes that can suppress hypergravity-induced axon defects. Among these, we found genes involved in tissue structure organization including the cytoskeletal protein UNC-70 β-spectrin. We showed by genetic rescue that UNC-70 expression in both muscle and epidermis is required for HIAD. Moreover, we showed that in addition to unc-70, structural proteins in the epidermis, ECM and cuticle that contribute to the structure and integrity of FOs were also required for HIAD.
We propose a model in which structural proteins that hold muscle-epidermal-cuticular tissue layers into proper positions may impede axon passage upon acute gravity force due to compression of tissue layers including the narrow basal lamina-ECM that the axons must migrate through (Fig. 7). We speculate that the disturbance of proteins that allow the muscle, epidermis and cuticle to remain physically connected loosens the rigid organization of the tissue layers allowing the passage of axons even in the presence of a strong hypergravity force. Further analysis of the role of myotactin and integrins, which are associated with FOs in the ECM41,52,53 and MUA-3, which is associated with FOs on the apical side of the epidermis54, should bolster support for this hypothesis.
How then does loss of these structural connectors allow DD/VD axons to easily reach their dorsal targets in the presence of hypergravity? The first consequence of this is the decreased density of structural proteins in the ECM. FOs densely line the ECM between muscle and epidermis. Loss of or decreased FOs would provide the axon growth cones a clearer path to their targets. The second consequence of decreased structural proteins is the increased space in the ECM. The ECM between muscle and epidermis is a narrow 20 nm space55. However, it has been shown that in mutants in which muscle separates from the epidermis, large pockets of space develop in the ECM47,56. This can potentially mitigate stalling and errors that normally occur in the tight ECM migration pathways. Further cell biological and ultrastructural analysis during DD/VD axon migration in the L1/L2 larval stages need to be conducted to confirm these hypotheses.
Other factors that may influence HIAD
It is well established that axon outgrowth and guidance mechanisms allow the axon to reach proper targets, but we found that mutants of axon outgrowth and guidance as well as a mechanosensory mutant did not alter HIAD. This was not surprising given the fact hypergravity exposure for 18 h from embryo to early L1 was sufficient to induce axon defects22. Since VD neurons are born after the L1–L2 transition, hypergravity’s effect occurs before the neurons are even born. These two lines of evidence allowed us to negate the idea of a direct gravity effect on the neurons, and instead investigate other tissues or cell types.
In our previous characterization of DD/VD axon development, we found rare but consistent axon defects in wild-type animals under normal gravity conditions22. A noticeable pattern appeared in which defects occurred more frequently at certain axons than others. Here, we measured the longitudinal area of the dorsal muscle and found that the high-error rate axons generally traversed the larger muscle cells (Fig. 4). Since it is known that the physical presence of muscle causes the VD axons to stall at the dorsal lateral side37, and that the axon growth cone must navigate the narrow 20 nm basal lamina/ECM space between the muscle and epidermis55, we speculate that larger muscle could further narrow the basal lamina/ECM passageway impeding normal axon migration independent of gravity conditions.
In this line of reasoning, one may speculate that hypergravity increases muscle cell size to hinder axon migration. Contrary to this, hypergravity decreases longitudinal muscle size (Fig. 5). A previous report demonstrated that 100G hypergravity does not alter muscle structure but may increase sarcomere length slightly16. Since we have only measured the longitudinal size of the middle of the muscle rather than 3D muscle volume, we cannot confirm whether muscle cells are actually smaller in hypergravity. Further experiments will need to confirm the effect of hypergravity on actual muscle cell size.
We show that hypergravity does not increase DD/VD axon defects in mutants of unc-70. However, unc-70 mutants themselves show slight increases albeit relatively low numbers of axon defects, and transgenic expression of unc-70 also induced low levels of axon defects (Fig. 2). From previous studies we know that the loss of unc-70 results in (1) DD/VD neuron axon fragility29; and (2) abnormal FO localization resulting in the loss of PLM neuron axon integrity in the epidermis40. Due to these roles of UNC-70, we surmise that altering levels of UNC-70 in the neurons, epidermis and muscle could result in increased DD/VD axon defects which appears to be separate from the increases observed in hypergravity in normal animals and the suppression observed in unc-70 mutants.
We showed that mutations in genes expressed in epidermal cells including unc-70 and sma-1 β-spectrin genes and vab-19 (Fig. 6) suppressed HIAD. Although their encoded protein are known to associate with FO structures, sma-1 and vab-19 also play important roles in epidermal elongation that allow the worm body to grow in size46,57,58, whereas a role for unc-70 in body growth is unknown. During larval development, structures such as the DD/VD axon adjust themselves to the growing body by some unknown mechanism. An alternative explanation of why unc-70 suppresses HIAD could be that hypergravity disrupts this mechanism during the L1 larval stage resulting in HIAD, and compensatory mutations that alter body growth such as sma-1 and vab-19 suppress HIAD. To assess whether sma-1, vab-19, and unc-70 are all necessary for body elongation from L1 to L2 larval stages, we measured their body lengths two hours and again 18 h after hatching. However, unc-70 mutants were normal for body length during early larval development (Fig S4). Thus, we do not observe any relationship between body elongation and HIAD.
Several mutants that suppress HIAD such as unc-70 and unc-54 are known to be important for proper muscle structure and development35,36,59. Indeed, we demonstrate that a weak of allele of unc-7030 shows smaller body wall muscle size than normal (Fig. 5). However, other mutants that suppress HIAD have normal muscle structure and development46,51. Further genetic analysis is needed to determine the relationship between muscle structure and HIAD. Another possibility that may explain genetic suppression of HIAD could be that hypergravity increases the FO density by increasing the number of FO structures in the ECM. However, additional analysis of FO protein expression and localization is required to ascertain this possibility.
Application in vertebrates and mammals under hypergravity and microgravity
In this study we have chosen C. elegans as a model animal to investigate the effects of hypergravity on proper neuron development due to its ease of experimental use and availability of C. elegans genetic tools. As the ability of an animal to withstand gravity force is inversely correlated to its size and weight60, we sought to find a gravity force appropriate for C. elegans. Although mammals can withstand forces of 10-15G, C. elegans can withstand forces upwards of 400,000 G61. Since 100G hypergravity has been used in several previous studies16,17,22, we decided that this gravity force would be appropriate for our study and comparable to hypergravity forces experienced in higher animals during spaceflight.
We have demonstrated that in C. elegans hypergravity may be compressing rigid tissue layers together squeezing down on the sandwiched ECM space and indirectly causing defects in axons that migrate through the narrow channels of the ECM. Though the induced axon defects are significant and reproducible, subtle defects as those shown here and previously do not result in any noticeable change in locomotory behavior62. Our genetic experiments show that loss of proteins that promote cell and tissue adhesion can suppress the neuronal defects. Such genetic and tissue level hypergravity and microgravity experiments are possible in an invertebrate animal like nematodes but may pose a challenge in higher animals. However, clues that may support our hypothesis have been observed previously in mammalian studies. First, slowing of development and decreases in brain cell number or brain volume correspond with hypergravity exposure in the vertebrate nervous system6,7,8,9,10 including changes in the development of vestibular neuron axons11. Second, expression levels of the cell adhesion proteins CD15 and NCAM-L1 are associated with hypergravity-induced changes in the brain9,12. It would be interesting to explore whether hypergravity forces influence cell or tissue adhesion in vertebrates, and whether there are causative relationships between cell and tissue adhesion and hypergravity-induced changes observed in the vertebrate nervous system.
Furthermore, changes observed in laboratory-simulated or real space microgravity may be consistent with our observations. For instance hindlimb unloading experiments in mice resulted in decreases in expression of type IV collagen gene and the UNC-70 homologue perlecan gene in spinal cord63. Space-flown human T lymphocyte cells showed increased expression in the VAB-10-related human plectin gene and the UNC-54-related myosin gene64. Whether these gene expression changes are reflective of changes in cell or tissue interactions in response to microgravity environments need to further evaluated.
Fitts, R. H., Riley, D. R. & Widrick, J. J. Functional and structural adaptations of skeletal muscle to microgravity. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 3201–3208 (2001).
Vandenburgh, H., Chromiak, J., Shansky, J., Del Tatto, M. & Lemaire, J. Space travel directly induces skeletal muscle atrophy. FASEB J. 13, 1031–1038 (1999).
Garrett-Bakelman, F. E. et al. The NASA Twins study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau8650 (2019).
Ross, M. D. & Tomko, D. L. Effect of gravity on vestibular neural development. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 28, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00025-3 (1998).
Cohen, B. et al. Vestibular experiments in space. Adv. Space Biol. Med. 10, 105–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-2574(05)10005-7 (2005).
Kashiwagi, A. et al. Effects of high gravity on amphibian development. Biol. Sci. Space 17, 215–216 (2003).
Anken, R. H., Werner, K. & Rahmann, H. Effects of hypergravity on the development of cell number and asymmetry in fish brain nuclei. Adv. Space Res. 30, 849–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0273-1177(01)00644-5 (2002).
Sajdel-Sulkowska, E. M. et al. Effects of hypergravity exposure on the developing central nervous system: Possible involvement of thyroid hormone. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 226, 790–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/153537020222600812 (2001).
Sajdel-Sulkowska, E. M. Brain development, environment and sex: What can we learn from studying graviperception, gravitransduction and the gravireaction of the developing CNS to altered gravity?. Cerebellum 7, 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-008-0001-8 (2008).
Sajdel-Sulkowska, E. M., Nguon, K., Sulkowski, Z. L., Rosen, G. D. & Baxter, M. G. Purkinje cell loss accompanies motor impairment in rats developing at altered gravity. NeuroReport 16, 2037–2040. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200512190-00014 (2005).
Bruce, L. L. Adaptations of the vestibular system to short and long-term exposures to altered gravity. Adv. Space Res. 32, 1533–1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)90392-9 (2003).
Sulkowski, G. M., Li, G. H. & Sajdel-Sulkowska, E. M. Environmental impacts on the developing CNS: CD15, NCAM-L1, and GFAP expression in rat neonates exposed to hypergravity. Adv. Space Res. 33, 1423–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2004.01.003 (2004).
Higashibata, A. et al. Decreased expression of myogenic transcription factors and myosin heavy chains in Caenorhabditis elegans muscles developed during spaceflight. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 3209–3218. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02365 (2006).
Higashibata, A. et al. Microgravity elicits reproducible alterations in cytoskeletal and metabolic gene and protein expression in space-flown Caenorhabditis elegans. NPJ Microgravity 2, 15022. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjmgrav.2015.22 (2016).
Harada, S. et al. Fluid dynamics alter Caenorhabditis elegans body length via TGF-beta/DBL-1 neuromuscular signaling. NPJ Microgravity 2, 16006. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.6 (2016).
Kim, N. et al. Gravity force transduced by the MEC-4/MEC-10 DEG/ENaC channel modulates DAF-16/FoxO activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 177, 835–845. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.076901 (2007).
Saldanha, J. N., Pandey, S. & Powell-Coffman, J. A. The effects of short-term hypergravity on Caenorhabditis elegans. Life Sci. Space Res. (Amst.) 10, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lssr.2016.06.003 (2016).
Chalfie, M. et al. The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 5, 956–964 (1985).
Sulston, J. E. & Horvitz, H. R. Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 56, 110–156 (1977).
Hedgecock, E. M., Culotti, J. G., Hall, D. H. & Stern, B. D. Genetics of cell and axon migrations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 100, 365–382 (1987).
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N. & Brenner, S. The structure of the ventral nerve cord of Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275, 327–348 (1976).
Kalichamy, S. S., Lee, T. Y., Yoon, K. H. & Lee, J. I. Hypergravity hinders axonal development of motor neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. PeerJ 4, e2666. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2666 (2016).
Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).
Lewis, J. A. F., J.T. in Caenorhabditis elegans: Modern Biological Analysis of an Organism Vol. 48 Methods in Cell Biology (ed H.F.; Shakes Epstein, D.C.) 4–27 (Academic Press, London, 1995).
Steiernagle, T. in C. elegans: A Practical Approach (ed I. Hope) 51–67 (Oxford University Press, Oxford , 1999).
Gendrel, M., Atlas, E. G. & Hobert, O. A cellular and regulatory map of the GABAergic nervous system of C. elegans. Elife 5, 66. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17686 (2016).
Finney, M. & Ruvkun, G. The unc-86 gene product couples cell lineage and cell identity in C. elegans. Cell 63, 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90493-x (1990).
Morck, C. & Pilon, M. C. elegans feeding defective mutants have shorter body lengths and increased autophagy. BMC Dev. Biol. 6, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-6-39 (2006).
Hammarlund, M., Jorgensen, E. M. & Bastiani, M. J. Axons break in animals lacking beta-spectrin. J. Cell. Biol. 176, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200611117 (2007).
Krieg, M., Dunn, A. R. & Goodman, M. B. Mechanical control of the sense of touch by beta-spectrin. Nat. Cell. Biol. 16, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2915 (2014).
Teuliere, J., Gally, C., Garriga, G., Labouesse, M. & Georges-Labouesse, E. MIG-15 and ERM-1 promote growth cone directional migration in parallel to UNC-116 and WVE-1. Development 138, 4475–4485. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.061952 (2011).
MacNeil, L. T., Hardy, W. R., Pawson, T., Wrana, J. L. & Culotti, J. G. UNC-129 regulates the balance between UNC-40 dependent and independent UNC-5 signaling pathways. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2256 (2009).
Driscoll, M. & Chalfie, M. The mec-4 gene is a member of a family of Caenorhabditis elegans genes that can mutate to induce neuronal degeneration. Nature 349, 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1038/349588a0 (1991).
Hammarlund, M. & Jin, Y. Axon regeneration in C. elegans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 27, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.04.001 (2014).
Moorthy, S., Chen, L. & Bennett, V. Caenorhabditis elegans beta-G spectrin is dispensable for establishment of epithelial polarity, but essential for muscular and neuronal function. J. Cell. Biol. 149, 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.149.4.915 (2000).
Hammarlund, M., Davis, W. S. & Jorgensen, E. M. Mutations in beta-spectrin disrupt axon outgrowth and sarcomere structure. J. Cell. Biol. 149, 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.149.4.931 (2000).
Knobel, K. M., Jorgensen, E. M. & Bastiani, M. J. Growth cones stall and collapse during axon outgrowth in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 126, 4489–4498 (1999).
Francis, R. & Waterston, R. H. Muscle cell attachment in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell. Biol. 114, 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.114.3.465 (1991).
Cox, E. A. & Hardin, J. Sticky worms: Adhesion complexes in C. elegans. J. Cell. Sci. 117, 1885–1897. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01176 (2004).
Coakley, S., Ritchie, F. K., Galbraith, K. M. & Hilliard, M. A. Epidermal control of axonal attachment via beta-spectrin and the GTPase-activating protein TBC-10 prevents axonal degeneration. Nat. Commun. 11, 133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13795-x (2020).
Hresko, M. C., Williams, B. D. & Waterston, R. H. Assembly of body wall muscle and muscle cell attachment structures in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell. Biol. 124, 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.124.4.491 (1994).
Moerman, D. G. & Williams, B. D. Sarcomere assembly in C. elegans muscle. WormBook https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.81.1 (2006).
Caceres Ide, C., Valmas, N., Hilliard, M. A. & Lu, H. Laterally orienting C. elegans using geometry at microscale for high-throughput visual screens in neurodegeneration and neuronal development studies. PLoS ONE 7, 35037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035037 (2012).
Lee, J. et al. A role for peroxidasin PXN-1 in aspects of C. elegans development. Mol. Cells 38, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2015.2202 (2015).
MacLeod, A. R., Waterston, R. H. & Brenner, S. An internal deletion mutant of a myosin heavy chain in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5336–5340. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5336 (1977).
Ding, M., Goncharov, A., Jin, Y. & Chisholm, A. D. C. elegans ankyrin repeat protein VAB-19 is a component of epidermal attachment structures and is essential for epidermal morphogenesis. Development 130, 5791–5801. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00791 (2003).
Bosher, J. M. et al. The Caenorhabditis elegans vab-10 spectraplakin isoforms protect the epidermis against internal and external forces. J. Cell. Biol. 161, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200302151 (2003).
Fu, R., Jiang, X., Huang, Z. & Zhang, H. The spectraplakins of Caenorhabditis elegans: Cytoskeletal crosslinkers and beyond. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 69, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.003 (2017).
Rogalski, T. M., Gilchrist, E. J., Mullen, G. P. & Moerman, D. G. Mutations in the unc-52 gene responsible for body wall muscle defects in adult Caenorhabditis elegans are located in alternatively spliced exons. Genetics 139, 159–169 (1995).
Merz, D. C., Alves, G., Kawano, T., Zheng, H. & Culotti, J. G. UNC-52/perlecan affects gonadal leader cell migrations in C. elegans hermaphrodites through alterations in growth factor signaling. Dev. Biol. 256, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00014-9 (2003).
Kramer, J. M., French, R. P., Park, E. C. & Johnson, J. J. The Caenorhabditis elegans rol-6 gene, which interacts with the sqt-1 collagen gene to determine organismal morphology, encodes a collagen. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 2081–2089. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.10.5.2081 (1990).
Hresko, M. C., Schriefer, L. A., Shrimankar, P. & Waterston, R. H. Myotactin, a novel hypodermal protein involved in muscle-cell adhesion in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 146, 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.3.659 (1999).
Rogalski, T. M., Mullen, G. P., Gilbert, M. M., Williams, B. D. & Moerman, D. G. The UNC-112 gene in Caenorhabditis elegans encodes a novel component of cell-matrix adhesion structures required for integrin localization in the muscle cell membrane. J. Cell. Biol. 150, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.150.1.253 (2000).
Bercher, M. et al. mua-3, a gene required for mechanical tissue integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans, encodes a novel transmembrane protein of epithelial attachment complexes. J. Cell. Biol. 154, 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200103035 (2001).
Huang, C. C. et al. Laminin alpha subunits and their role in C. elegans development. Development 130, 3343–3358. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00481 (2003).
Gotenstein, J. R. et al. The C. elegans peroxidasin PXN-2 is essential for embryonic morphogenesis and inhibits adult axon regeneration. Development 137, 3603–3613. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.049189 (2010).
McKeown, C., Praitis, V. & Austin, J. sma-1 encodes a betaH-spectrin homolog required for Caenorhabditis elegans morphogenesis. Development 125, 2087–2098 (1998).
Praitis, V., Ciccone, E. & Austin, J. SMA-1 spectrin has essential roles in epithelial cell sheet morphogenesis in C. elegans. Dev. Biol. 283, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.04.002 (2005).
Mackenzie, J. M. Jr., Garcea, R. L., Zengel, J. M. & Epstein, H. F. Muscle development in Caenorhabditis elegans: Mutants exhibiting retarded sarcomere construction. Cell 15, 751–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(78)90261-1 (1978).
Le Bourg, E. & Minois, N. A mild stress, hypergravity exposure, postpones behavioral aging in Drosophila melanogaster. Exp. Gerontol. 34, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0531-5565(98)00077-1 (1999).
de Souza, T. A. J. & Pereira, T. C. Caenorhabditis elegans Tolerates Hyperaccelerations up to 400000×g. Astrobiology 18, 825–833. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2017.1802 (2018).
Huang, X., Cheng, H. J., Tessier-Lavigne, M. & Jin, Y. MAX-1, a novel PH/MyTH4/FERM domain cytoplasmic protein implicated in netrin-mediated axon repulsion. Neuron 34, 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00672-4 (2002).
Chelyshev, Y. A. et al. Characterization of spinal cord glial cells in a model of hindlimb unloading in mice. Neuroscience 280, 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.004 (2014).
Lewis, M. L. et al. cDNA microarray reveals altered cytoskeletal gene expression in space-flown leukemic T lymphocytes (Jurkat). FASEB J. 15, 1783–1785. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.00-0820fje (2001).
We would like to thank Y. Jin and E. Jorgensen for sharing strains, and the Caenorhabditis Genetic Center for strains. We would like to thank Y. Kim for suggestions for the manuscript. This research was sponsored by the National Research Foundation of Korea 2018M1A3A3A02065699 (J.I.L.).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kalichamy, S.S., Alcantara, A.V., Kim, BS. et al. Muscle and epidermal contributions of the structural protein β-spectrin promote hypergravity-induced motor neuron axon defects in C. elegans. Sci Rep 10, 21214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78414-y